Search

Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation therapy for patients with cancer and acute low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is clinically relevant, but evidence is lacking. Prolonged anticoagulation therapy could have a potential benefit for prevention of thrombotic events; however, it could also increase the risk of bleeding., Methods: In a multicenter, open-label, adjudicator-blinded, randomized clinical trial at 32 institutions in Japan, we randomly assigned patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive either an 18-month or a 6-month rivaroxaban treatment. The primary end point was recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) at 18 months. The major secondary end point was major bleeding at 18 months according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. The primary hypothesis was that an 18-month treatment was superior to a 6-month treatment in terms of the primary end point., Results: From February 2021 to March 2023, 179 patients were randomized, and after the exclusion of one patient who withdrew consent, 178 were included in the intention-to-treat population: 89 patients in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and 89 in the 6-month rivaroxaban group. The mean age was 65.7 years; 47% of the patients were men, and 12% had symptoms of PE at baseline. The primary end point of recurrent VTE occurred in 5 of the 89 patients (5.6%) in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and in 17 of the 89 (19.1%) in the 6-month rivaroxaban group (odds ratio, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.72]; P =0.01). Among 22 recurrent VTE, 5 patients presented with a symptomatic recurrent VTE; recurrent PE occurred in 11 patients, including 2 with main and 4 with lobar PEs; and recurrent deep vein thrombosis was seen in 11 patients, including 3 with proximal deep vein thromboses. The major secondary end point of major bleeding occurred in 7 of the 89 patients (7.8 %) in the 18-month rivaroxaban group and in 5 of the 89 patients (5.6%) in the 6-month rivaroxaban group (odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.44-4.70]; P =0.55)., Conclusions: In patients with cancer and acute low-risk PE of the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score of 1, the 18-month rivaroxaban treatment was superior to the 6-month rivaroxaban treatment with respect to recurrent VTE events.

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reportedly reduce upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, whether the benefits of PPIs differ in high-risk subgroups is unknown., Methods and Results: Among 24,563 patients undergoing first PCI in the CREDO-Kyoto registry Cohort-2 and -3, we evaluated long-term effects of PPI for UGIB, defined as GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding, in several potential high-risk subgroups. In the study population, 45.6% of patients were prescribed PPIs. Over a median 5.6-year follow-up, PPIs were associated with lower adjusted risk of UGIB (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.80; P<0.001) and a non-significant but numerically lower risk of any gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-1.01; P=0.06). PPIs were not associated with a lower risk of GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.94-1.15; P=0.40) or a higher adjusted risk of myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.90-1.12; P=0.97), but were associated with higher adjusted mortality risk (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09-1.27; P<0.001). The effects of PPIs for UGIB, myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke, and all-cause death were consistent regardless of age, sex, acute coronary syndrome, high bleeding risk, oral anticoagulant use, and type of P2Y 12 inhibitor., Conclusions: PPIs were associated with a lower risk of UGIB and a neutral risk of ischemic events regardless of high-risk subgroup.

Background: Data on the impact of valve position on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and bioprosthetic valves (BPVs) are limited., Methods and Results: The BPV-AF Registry was a multicenter, prospective, observational study involving 894 patients with BPVs and AF. In this post-hoc substudy, patients were classified according to BPV position: aortic (n=588; 65.8%), mitral (n=195; 21.8%), or both (n=111; 12.4%). The primary outcome was a composite of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, heart failure requiring hospitalization, all-cause death, or BPV reoperation. During a mean follow up of 15.3±4.0 months, the primary outcome occurred in 90 (15.3%) patients (12.7/100 patient-years) in the aortic group, 25 (12.8%; 10.2/100 patient-years) in the mitral group, and 16 (14.4%; 11.8/100 patient-years) in the both-valves group (log-rank P=0.621). The unadjusted and adjusted risks were not significant for the mitral and both-valves groups relative to the aortic group (unadjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.80 [0.52-1.25] and 0.92 [0.54-1.57]; adjusted hazard ratio 0.89 [0.51-1.54] and 1.10 [0.58-2.09], respectively). There was no significant difference in the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism or major bleeding among the 3 groups (log-rank P=0.651 and 0.156, respectively)., Conclusions: In patients with BPVs and AF, the risk for the composite outcome was comparable regardless of the BPV position., Competing Interests: H.T. has received remuneration from AstraZeneca plc, Ono Pharmaceutical Company, Limited, Pfizer Inc, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited, Eli Lilly and Company, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Abbott Japan LLC, and Novartis International AG. K.A. has received remuneration from Japan Lifeline, Abbott Medical Japan, Medtronic Japan, BIOTRONIK Japan, TERUMO, and Novartis Pharma. M.I. has received consultancy fees from Abbott Medical Japan LLC, and remuneration from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. T. Kimura has received remuneration from Abbott Medical Japan LLC, research funding from Research Institute for Production Development, EP-CRSU Co., Ltd, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, and Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and scholarship funds or donations from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, and Research Institute for Production Development. T.S. has received remuneration from Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. K.M. has received scholarship funds or donations from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd, and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. K.T. has received remuneration from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Pfizer Japan Inc., research funding from AMI Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd, and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, scholarship funding from AMI Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and is affiliated with the endowed department sponsored by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd, Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd, ITI Co., Ltd, Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd, Nipro Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd, Abbott Medical Co., Ltd, Cardinal Health Japan LLC, Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd, Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd, Medical Appliance Co., Ltd, and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. Y. Sakata has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, and scholarship funding from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. M.F. is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. T.T. has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, and Bayer Yakuhin Ltd. K.N. has received research funding from Philips Japan Ltd, Terumo Co., Ltd, TEPCO Power Grid Inc., and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co. Y.F. has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, and Novartis Pharma K.K. C.I. has received remuneration and research funding from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.T. is a member of Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.)

Background: Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have a bioprosthetic valve (BPV). However, the data related to elderly patients (aged ≥80 years) with BPV replacement and AF are limited., Methods: This post-hoc subgroup analysis of a BPV-AF Registry enrolled 752 patients with BPV replacement and AF. The primary net outcome was a composite of cardiac death, stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and cardiovascular events., Results: Among 752 patients, 429 (57%) patients were ≥ 80 and 323 (43%) were < 80 years old. The higher risk in patients aged ≥80 than <80 years was significant for the net outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-3.17; P = 0.001). After adjustment for confounders, there was no statistically significant difference between warfarin (reference) and DOAC users in the risk of net outcomes (adjusted HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.71-2.24; P = 0.44), stroke and systemic embolism (adjusted HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 0.48-8.38; P = 0.34), and major bleeding (adjusted HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.11-4.98; P = 0.75) in patients aged ≥80 years old as well as those aged <80 years. Among 489 warfarin users, the cumulative incidence of net outcomes tended to be higher in patients aged ≥80 than <80 years (12.2% vs. 5.7% at 1 year, log-rank P = 0.002). Among 263 DOAC users, however, it was similar between patients aged ≥80 and < 80 years., Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that DOAC showed similar efficacy and safety compared with warfarin even in elderly patients aged ≥80 years with BPV replacement and AF., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of very low baseline levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) on patients with coronary artery disease remains unclear., Method: We enrolled 39,439 patients of the pooled population from the CREDO-Kyoto registries Cohorts 1, 2, and 3. The study population consisted of 33,133 patients who had undergone their first coronary revascularization. We assessed the risk for mortality and cardiovascular events according to quintiles of the baseline LDL-C levels., Results: Patients in the very low LDL-C quintile (<85 mg/dL) had more comorbidities than those in the other quintiles. Lower LDL-C levels were strongly associated with anemia, thrombocytopenia, and end-stage renal disease. The cumulative 4-year incidence of all-cause death increased as LDL-C levels decreased (very low: 19.4 %, low: 14.5 %, intermediate: 11.1 %, high: 10.0 %, and very high: 9.2 %; p < 0.001), which was driven by both the early and late events. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the adjusted risks of the very low and low LDL-C quintiles relative to the intermediate LDL-C quintile remained significant for all-cause death (very low: HR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.16-1.44, p < 0.001; low: HR 1.15, 95 % CI 1.03-1.29, p = 0.01). The excess adjusted risks of the lowest LDL-C quintile relative to the intermediate LDL-C quintile were significant for clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular death (HR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.01-1.35), non-cardiovascular death (HR 1.35, 95 % CI 1.15-1.60), sudden death (HR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.01-2.06), and heart failure admission (HR 1.11 95 % CI 1.01-1.22), while there was no excess risk for the lowest LDL-C quintile relative to the intermediate LDL-C quintile for myocardial infarction and stroke., Conclusions: Lower baseline LDL-C levels were associated with more comorbidities and a significantly higher risk of death, regardless of cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular causes, in patients who underwent coronary revascularization., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are few studies evaluating the prognostic prediction method in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients after bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacement. The R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is increasingly used for the prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with AF, device implantation, and acute coronary syndrome. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score for future CV events in AF patients after BPV replacement., Methods and Results: The BPV-AF, an observational, multicenter, prospective registry, enrolled AF patients who underwent BPV replacement. The primary outcome measure was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, CV events including heart failure requiring hospitalization, and cardiac death. A total of 766 patients was included in the analysis. The mean R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was 5.7±1.8. Low (scores 0-1), moderate (scores 2-4), and high (scores 5-11) R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score groups consisted of 12 (1.6%), 178 (23.2%), and 576 (75.2%) patients, respectively. The median follow-up period was 491 (interquartile range 393-561) days. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a higher incidence of the composite CV events in the high R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score group (log rank test; P<0.001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that the R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score as a continuous variable was an independent predictor of composite CV outcomes (hazard ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.55; P<0.001)., Conclusions: The R 2 -CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is useful for CV risk stratification in AF patients after BPV replacement., Competing Interests: H.T. has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca PLC and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. K.A. has received remuneration from Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd, Terumo Corporation, and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. M.I. has received consultancy fees from Abbott Medical Japan LLC, and remuneration from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. T.S. has received remuneration from Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. K.M. has received scholarship funds or donations from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd, and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. K.M. has received scholarship funds or donations from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd., and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. K.T. is a member of Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team, and has received remuneration from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Pfizer Japan Inc.; research funding from AMI Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd, and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; scholarship funding from AMI Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd; and is affiliated with the endowed department sponsored by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd, Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd, ITI Co., Ltd, Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd, Nipro Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd, Abbott Medical Co., Ltd, Cardinal Health Japan LLC, Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd, Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd, Medical 3 Appliance Co., Ltd, and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. Y. Sakata has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd; and scholarship funding from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd, and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.S. is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.N. has received research funding from Philips Japan Ltd, Terumo Co., Ltd, TEPCO Power Grid Inc., and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co. C.I. has received remuneration and research funding from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Y.F. has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd, and Bayer Yakuhin Ltd. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclosure., (Copyright © 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.)

Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is often concomitant with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), which can cause adverse cardiovascular events. Although an appropriate approach to SDB prevents cardiac remodelling, detection of concomitant SDB in patients with HCM remains suboptimal. Thus, we aimed to develop a machine learning-based discriminant model for SDB in HCM., Methods: In the present multicentre study, we consecutively registered patients with HCM and performed nocturnal oximetry. The outcome was a high Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI), defined as 3% ODI >10, which significantly correlated with the presence of moderate or severe SDB. We randomly divided the whole participants into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%). With data from the training set, we developed a random forest discriminant model for high ODI based on clinical parameters. We tested the ability of the discriminant model on the test set and compared it with a previous logistic regression model for distinguishing SDB in patients with HCM., Results: Among 369 patients with HCM, 228 (61.8%) had high ODI. In the test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the discriminant model was 0.86 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.94). The sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.98) and specificity was 0.68 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.84). When the test set was divided into low-probability and high-probability groups, the high-probability group had a higher prevalence of high ODI than the low-probability group (82.4% vs 17.4%, OR 20.9 (95% CI 5.3 to 105.8), Fisher's exact test p<0.001). The discriminant model significantly outperformed the previous logistic regression model (DeLong test p=0.03)., Conclusions: Our study serves as the first to develop a machine learning-based discriminant model for the concomitance of SDB in patients with HCM. The discriminant model may facilitate cost-effective screening tests and treatments for SDB in the population with HCM., Competing Interests: Competing interests: YM received an unrestricted research grant from the Division of Cardiology, Internal Medicine III, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Astellas Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Daiichi-Sankyo Co, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co, Pfizer Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co and Teijin Pharma. YM reports receipt of Scholarship funds or Donations Scholarship funds from Abbott Medical Japan and BIOTRONIK JAPAN., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Patients with appropriately selected low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) can be treated at home, although it has been controversial whether applies to patients with cancer, who are considered not to be at low risk.Methods and Results: The current predetermined companion report from the ONCO PE trial evaluated the 3-month clinical outcomes of patients with home treatment and those with in-hospital treatment. The ONCO PE trial was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial among 32 institutions in Japan investigating the optimal duration of rivaroxaban treatment in cancer-associated PE patients with a score of 1 using the simplified version of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI). Among 178 study patients, there were 66 (37%) in the home treatment group and 112 (63%) in the in-hospital treatment group. The primary endpoint of a composite of PE-related death, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (4.6% [0.0-9.6%]) in the home treatment group and in 2 patients (1.8% [0.0-4.3%]) in the in-hospital treatment group. In the home treatment group, there were no cases of PE-related death or recurrent VTE, but major bleeding occurred in 3 patients (4.6% [0.0-9.6%]), and 2 patients (3.0% [0.0-7.2%]) required hospitalization due to bleeding events., Conclusions: Active cancer patients with PE of sPESI score=1 could be potential candidates for home treatment.

Post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) is a common complication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, it is unclear whether or not the effects of PC-AKI on long-term clinical outcomes were different between emergent and elective procedures. Among patients enrolled in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) registry cohort 3, we identified 10,822 patients treated using PCI (emergent PCI stratum: n = 5,022 [46%] and elective PCI stratum: n = 5,860 [54%]). PC-AKI was defined as ≥0.3 mg/100 ml absolute or 1.5-fold relative increase of serum creatinine within 72 hours after PCI. The incidence of PC-AKI was significantly higher after emergent PCI than after elective PCI (10.5% vs 3.7%, p <0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression model, emergent PCI was the strongest independent risk factor for PC-AKI in the entire study population. The excess adjusted risk of patients with PC-AKI relative to those without remained significant for all-cause death in both the emergent and elective PCI strata (hazard ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.59 to 2.21, p <0.001 and hazard ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.68, p = 0.03, respectively). There was a significant interaction between the PCI setting (emergent and elective) and the effect of PC-AKI on all-cause death, with a greater magnitude of effect in the emergent PCI stratum than in the elective PCI stratum (p for interaction = 0.01). In conclusion, the incidence of PC-AKI was 2.8 times higher after emergent PCI than after elective PCI. The excess mortality risk of PC-AKI relative to no PC-AKI was greater after emergent PCI than after elective PCI., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Shiomi reports modest honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr. Morimoto reports modest honoraria from Bayer and Kowa and modest expert witness from Boston Scientific and Sanofi. Dr. Furukawa reports modest honoraria from Bayer, Kowa, and Sanofi. Dr. Nakagawa reports modest research grant from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific and modest honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Bayer, and Boston Scientific. Dr. Kimura reports significant honoraria from Abbott Vascular and modest honoraria from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Kowa, and Sanofi. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The left atrial volume index (LAVI) is important for predicting thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), but the utility of LAVI for predicting thromboembolism in patients with both bioprosthetic valve replacement and AF remains unclear. Methods and Results: Of 894 patients from a previous multicenter prospective observational registry (BPV-AF Registry), 533 whose LAVI data had been obtained by transthoracic echocardiography were included in this subanalysis. Patients were divided into tertiles (T1-T3) according to LAVI as follows: T1 (n=177), LAVI=21.5-55.3 mL/m 2 ; T2 (n=178), LAVI=55.6-82.1 mL/m 2 ; T3 (n=178), LAVI=82.5-408.0 mL/m 2 . The primary outcome was defined as either stroke or systemic embolism for a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 15.3±4.2 months. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the primary outcome tended to occur more frequently in the group with the larger LAVI (log-rank P=0.098). Comparison of T1 with T2 plus T3 using Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that patients in T1 experienced significantly fewer primary outcomes (log-rank P=0.028). Furthermore, univariate Cox proportional hazard regression showed that 1.3- and 3.3-fold more primary outcomes occurred in T2 and T3, respectively, than in T1. Conclusions: Larger LAVI was associated with stroke or systemic embolism in patients who had undergone bioprosthetic valve replacement and with a definitive diagnosis of AF., Competing Interests: H.T. has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca PLC and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Novartis International AG, and Pfizer Japan Inc. K.A. has received remuneration from Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd., Terumo Corporation, and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. M.I. has received consultancy fees from Abbott Medical Japan LLC and remuneration from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. Takeshi Kimura has received remuneration from Abbott Medical Japan LLC; research funding from Research Institute for Production Development, EP-CRSU Co., Ltd., Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, and Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and scholarship funds or donations from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., and Research Institute for Production Development. T.S. has received remuneration from Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. K.M. has received scholarship funds or donations from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd., and Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd. K.T. has received remuneration from Amgen K.K., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Pfizer Japan Inc.; research funding from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; scholarship funding from AMI Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; and is affiliated with the endowed department sponsored by Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Boston Scientific Japan K.K., Fides-one Inc., GM Medical Co., Ltd., ITI Co., Ltd., Kaneka Medix Co., Ltd., Nipro Corporation, Terumo Co., Ltd., Abbott Medical Co., Ltd., Cardinal Health Japan LLC., Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd., Japan Lifeline Co., Ltd., Medical Appliance Co., Ltd., and Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd. Y. Sakata has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.; and scholarship funding from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Tetsuya Kimura is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.N. has received research funding from Philips Japan Ltd., Terumo Co., Ltd., TEPCO Power Grid Inc., and Asahi Kasei Pharma Co. Y.F. has received remuneration from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Novartis Pharma K.K. C.I. has received remuneration and research funding from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. K.T. is a member of Circulation Reports’ Editorial Team. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY.)

Background: Current guidelines equally recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a bioprosthetic valve (BPV); however, there are limited data comparing DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV., Methods and results: This post-hoc subgroup analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational registry (BPV-AF Registry) aimed to compare DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, heart failure requiring hospitalization, all-cause death, or BPV reoperation. The analysis included 479 patients (warfarin group, n=258; DOAC group, n=221). Surgical aortic valve replacement was performed in 74.4% and 36.7% of patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. During a mean follow up of 15.5 months, the primary outcome occurred in 45 (17.4%) and 32 (14.5%) patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. No significant difference was found in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.51-1.50). No significant multiplicative interaction was observed between the anticoagulant effects and type of aortic valve procedure (P=0.577)., Conclusions: Among AF patients with an aortic BPV, no significant difference was observed in the composite outcome of adverse clinical events between patients treated with warfarin and those treated with DOACs, suggesting that DOACs can be used as alternatives to warfarin in these patients.

Background: Optimal intensity is unclear for P2Y 12 receptor blocker therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in real-world clinical practice., Methods and results: From the CREDO-Kyoto Registry, the current study population consisted of 25,419 patients (Cohort-2: n=12,161 and Cohort-3: n=13,258) who underwent their first PCI. P2Y 12 receptor blocker therapies were reduced dose of ticlopidine (200 mg/day), and global dose of clopidogrel (75 mg/day) in 87.7% and 94.8% of patients in Cohort-2 and Cohort-3, respectively. Cumulative 3-year incidence of GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding was significantly higher in Cohort-3 than in Cohort-2 (12.1% and 9.0%, P<0.0001). After adjusting 17 demographic factors and 9 management factors potentially related to the bleeding events other than the type of P2Y 12 receptor blocker, the higher bleeding risk in Cohort-3 relative to Cohort-2 remained significant (hazard ratio (HR): 1.52 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.37-1.68, P<0.0001). Cohort-3 compared with Cohort-2 was not associated with lower adjusted risk for myocardial infarction/ischemic stroke (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.06, P=0.44)., Conclusions: In this historical comparative study, Cohort-3 compared with Cohort-2 was associated with excess bleeding risk, which might be at least partly explained by the difference in P2Y 12 receptor blockers.

Background: Although bioprosthetic valve (BPV) replacements are becoming more common within our aging society, there are limited prospective data on the appropriate antithrombotic therapy for East Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and BPV replacement. Antithrombotic therapy and thrombotic and hemorrhagic event rates in Japanese patients with AF and BPV replacement are investigated., Methods and results: This multicenter, prospective, observational study enrolled patients with BPV replacement and AF. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Of the 894 patients analyzed, 54.7%, 29.4%, and 9.6%, were treated with warfarin-based therapy, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-based therapy, or antiplatelet therapy without anticoagulants, respectively; 6.3% did not receive any antithrombotic drugs. The mean observation period was 15.3±4.0 months. The event rates for stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were 1.95%/year and 1.86%/year, respectively. The multivariate adjusted hazard ratios for DOAC vs. warfarin were 1.02 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.30-3.41 [P=0.979]) for systemic embolic events and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.29-3.16 [P=0.945]) for major bleeding., Conclusions: Approximately 30% of patients with AF and BPV replacement were treated with DOAC. The risks of major bleeding and stroke or systemic embolism were similar between warfarin- and DOAC-treated patients with AF who had BPV replacement. Treatment with DOACs could be an alternative to warfarin in this population.

Background: There are limited data on the long-term stent-related adverse events as related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in second-generation (G2) drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with first-generation (G1) DES., Objectives: This study sought to compare the long-term stent-related outcomes of G2-DES with those of G1-DES., Methods: The study group consisted of 15,009 patients who underwent their first coronary revascularization with DES from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) Registry Cohort-2 (first-generation drug-eluting stent [G1-DES] period; n = 5,382) and Cohort-3 (second-generation drug eluting stent [G2-DES] period; n = 9,627). The primary outcome measures were definite stent thrombosis (ST) and target vessel revascularization (TVR)., Results: The cumulative 5-year incidences of definite ST and TVR were significantly lower in the G2-DES group than in the G1-DES group (0.7% vs 1.4%; P  < 0.001; and 16.2% vs 22.1%; P  < 0.001, respectively). The lower adjusted risk of G2-DES relative to G1-DES for definite ST and TVR remained significant (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.76; P  < 0.001; and HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.68-0.81; P  < 0.001, respectively). In the landmark analysis that was based on the DAPT status at 1 year, the lower adjusted risk of on-DAPT status relative to off-DAPT was significant for definite ST beyond 1 year in the G1-DES stratum (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.76; P  = 0.004) but not in the G2-DES stratum (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.26-1.68; P  = 0.38) ( P interaction  = 0.14)., Conclusions: G2-DES compared with G1-DES were associated with a significantly lower risk for stent-related adverse events, including definite ST and TVR. DAPT beyond 1 year was associated with a significantly lower risk for very late ST of G1-DES but not for that of G2-DES., Competing Interests: This study was supported by an educational grant from the Research Institute for Production Development (Kyoto, Japan). Dr Shiomi has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Morimoto has received lecturer fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kowa, Kyocera, Novartis, and Toray; has received manuscript fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Kowa; and has received membership on the advisory board for Sanofi. Dr Kato has received honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Bayer, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, MSD KK, and Amgen; and has received research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical and Abbott Japan. Dr Furukawa has received honoraria from Bayer, Kowa, and Sanofi. Dr Nakagawa has received research grants from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific; and has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Bayer, and Boston Scientific. Dr Kimura has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Kowa, and Sanofi. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Background: Data evaluating the effects of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) relative to stable coronary artery disease (CAD) on bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are scarce., Methods and results: From the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-3, 13,258 patients undergoing first PCI (5,521 ACS; 7,737 stable CAD) were identified. Patients were further stratified according to ACS presentation and Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk (HBR): ACS/HBR: n=2,502; ACS/no-HBR: n=3,019; stable CAD/HBR: n=3,905; and stable CAD/no-HBR: n=3,832. The primary bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3/5 bleeding, whereas the primary ischemic endpoint was myocardial infarction (MI)/ischemic stroke. Compared with stable CAD, ACS was associated with a significantly higher adjusted risk for bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-2.03; P<0.0001), with a markedly higher risk within 30 days (HR 4.24; 95% CI 3.56-5.06; P<0.0001). Compared with the stable CAD/no-HBR group, the ACS/HBR, no-ACS/HBR, and ACS/no-HBR groups were associated with significantly higher adjusted risks for bleeding, with HRs of 3.05 (95% CI 2.64-3.54; P<0.0001), 1.89 (95% CI 1.66-2.15; P<0.0001), and 1.69 (95% CI 1.45-1.98; P<0.0001), respectively. There was no excess adjusted risk of the ACS relative to stable CAD group for MI/ischemic stroke (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.94-1.22; P=0.33)., Conclusions: Bleeding risk after PCI depended on both ACS presentation and HBR, with a significant effect of ACS within 30 days.

The treatment of coronary artery disease has substantially changed over the past two decades. However, it is unknown whether and how much these changes have contributed to the improvement of long-term outcomes after coronary revascularization. We assessed trends in the demographics, practice patterns and long-term outcomes in 24,951 patients who underwent their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (n = 20,106), or isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 4,845) using the data in a series of the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registries (Cohort-1 [2000 to 2002]: n = 7,435, Cohort-2 [2005 to 2007]: n = 8,435, and Cohort-3 [2011 to 2013]: n = 9,081). From Cohort-1 to Cohort-3, the patients got progressively older across subsequent cohorts (67.0 ± 10.0, 68.4 ± 9.9, and 69.8 ± 10.2 years, p trend < 0.001). There was increased use of PCI over CABG (73.5%, 81.9%, and 85.2%, p trend < 0.001) and increased prevalence of evidence-based medications use over time. The cumulative 3-year incidence of all-cause death was similar across the 3 cohorts (9.0%, 9.0%, and 9.3%, p = 0.74), while cardiovascular death decreased over time (5.7%, 5.1%, and 4.8%, p = 0.03). The adjusted risk for all-cause death and for cardiovascular death progressively decreased from Cohort-1 to Cohort-2 (HR:0.89, 95%CI:0.80 to 0.99, p = 0.03, and HR:0.80, 95%CI:0.70 to 0.92, p = 0.002, respectively), and from Cohort-2 to Cohort-3 (HR:0.86, 95%CI:0.78 to 0.95, p = 0.004, and HR:0.77, 95%CI:0.67-0.89, p < 0.001, respectively). The risks for stroke and repeated coronary revascularization also improved over time. In conclusions, we found a progressive and substantial reduction of adjusted risk for all-cause death, cardiovascular death, stroke, and repeated coronary revascularization over the past two decades in Japan., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Heart failure might be an important determinant in choosing coronary revascularization modalities. There was no previous study evaluating the effect of heart failure on long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods and Results Among 14 867 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization with PCI or isolated CABG between January 2011 and December 2013 in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3, we identified the current study population of 3380 patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, and compared clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG stratified by the subgroup based on the status of heart failure. There were 827 patients with heart failure (PCI: N=511, and CABG: N=316), and 2553 patients without heart failure (PCI: N=1619, and CABG: N=934). In patients with heart failure, the PCI group compared with the CABG group more often had advanced age, severe frailty, acute and severe heart failure, and elevated inflammatory markers. During a median 5.9 years of follow-up, there was a significant interaction between heart failure and the mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG (interaction P =0.009), with excess mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG in patients with heart failure (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.28-2.42; P <0.001) and no excess mortality risk in patients without heart failure (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.80-1.34; P =0.77). Conclusions There was a significant interaction between heart failure and the mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG with excess risk in patients with heart failure and neutral risk in patients without heart failure.

Long-term safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is still controversial in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCAD), and there is a scarcity of real-world data on the comparative long-term clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG for ULMCAD in new-generation drug-eluting stents era. The CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3 enrolled 14927 consecutive patients undergoing first coronary revascularization with PCI or isolated CABG between January 2011 and December 2013, and we identified 855 patients with ULMCAD (PCI: N = 383 [45%], and CABG: N = 472 [55%]). The primary outcome measure was all-cause death. Median follow-up duration was 5.5 (interquartile range: 3.9 to 6.6) years. The cumulative 5-year incidence of all-cause death was not significantly different between the PCI and CABG groups (21.9% vs 17.6%, Log-rank p = 0.13). After adjusting confounders, the excess risk of PCI relative to CABG remained insignificant for all-cause death (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.47; p = 0.99). There were significant excess risks of PCI relative to CABG for myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.37; p = 0.002, and HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.96 to 4.46; p < 0.001), whereas there was no significant excess risk of PCI relative to CABG for stroke (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.41; p = 0.52). In conclusion, there was no excess long-term mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG, while the excess risks of PCI relative to CABG were significant for myocardial infarction and any coronary revascularization in the present study population reflecting real-world clinical practice in Japan., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but fatal complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the mortality in patients with recent VSR and appropriate timing of surgical repair have not been clarified. To examine the background characteristics and mortality of VSR patients as well as the usefulness and appropriate timing of surgery in this patient cohort. Among 3,947 consecutive patients with AMI at our hospital, 39 patients diagnosed with VSR from 2002 to 2020 were included in the analysis. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography to confirm VSR on admission. Coronary angiography (CAG) and measurement of pulmonary-systemic flow ratio were performed before emergent surgery. The use of mechanical support devices before or after procedures was considered for all patients who underwent CAG. Basically, we performed emergent or urgent operations to patients who were in a shock state or who needed mechanical support. The final decision of the timing of the operation was made by the cardiac team. Patients' mean age was 76.3 years, and 33.3% of them were males. Most culprit lesions were located in the left anterior ascending artery (81.3%). The mean pulmonary-systemic flow ratio after VSR onset was 3.07 ± 1.98. On admission, 48.7% of patients were in a shock state. Surgical repair was possible in 28 patients at a median of 1 day after admission, with a mortality rate of 25%. Among all patients, the mortality rate was 43.6%. Survivors were significantly younger (71.3 ± 11.3 vs. 82.7 ± 6.2 years, p < 0.01), had higher mean arterial blood pressure (75.6 ± 14.4 vs. 62.8 ± 16.2 mmHg, p = 0.0496) and lower ejection fraction (44.3 ± 11.7% vs. 54.8 ± 7.9%, p = 0.04), and underwent surgical repair more frequently (95.5% vs. 41.2%, p < 0.01) than the non-survivors. In multivariate analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.38, p = 0.04) and surgical repair (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.73, p = 0.03) were significant predictors of survival. In surgical repair cases, time from admission to operation did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors. Surgical repair and younger age are predictors of survival in patients with recent VSR, but the timing of surgery was not.

Background: Secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) is an important aspect of healthcare. To improve the prognosis of and control risk factors for IHD patients, we created a unique referral system called the Shizuoka IHD patient registry., Methods: From 2009 to 2013, we enrolled 1240 patients; they participated in follow-up until 2018. The risk factor target values were as follows: low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, <100 mg/dl; glycated haemoglobin of diabetes patients, <7%; systolic blood pressure, <130 mmHg; and diastolic blood pressure, <80 mmHg (mean follow-up interval, 2001 ± 794 days). The cumulative incidence rates were 10.8% for all-cause death (cardiac death, 1.5%), 15.7% for coronary events, and 2.6% for major bleeding. Patients were separated into the major bleeding group ( n  = 32), coronary event group ( n  = 195), and event-free group ( n  = 1013) without overlapping., Results: We observed significant differences in age, rate antithrombotic drug use, and mortality. A Kaplan-Meier analysis of all-cause death showed significant differences between the event-free and major bleeding groups ( P =0.002) and between the coronary event and major bleeding groups ( P =0.026); there was no significant difference between the event-free and coronary event groups., Conclusion: Major bleeding events were stronger predictors of long-term mortality than coronary events during the long-term follow-up of stable IHD., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Shigetaka Kageyama et al.)

Cardiovascular disease, including ischemic heart disease, is a leading cause of death worldwide. Improvement of the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease is necessary. We established a unique referral system to connect hospitals and outpatient clinics to coordinate care between general practitioners and cardiologists. Here, we evaluated the impact and long-term benefits of our system for ischemic heart disease patients undergoing secondary prevention therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. This single-center retrospective observational study included 3658 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention at Shizuoka City Hospital between 2010 and 2019. After percutaneous coronary intervention, patients were considered conventional outpatients (conventional follow-up group) or subjected to our unique referral system (referral system group) at the attending cardiologist's discretion. To audit compliance of the treatment with the latest Japanese guidelines, we adopted a circulation-type referral system, whereby general practitioners needed to refer registered patients at least once a year, even if no cardiac events occurred. Clinical events in each patient were evaluated. Net adverse clinical events were defined as a combination of major adverse cardiac, cerebrovascular, and major bleeding events. There were 2241 and 1417 patients in the conventional follow-up and referral system groups, with mean follow-ups of 1255 and 1548 days and cumulative net adverse clinical event incidences of 27.6% and 21.5%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the occurrence of net adverse clinical events was significantly lower in the referral system group than in the conventional follow-up group (log-rank: P<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the unique referral system was a significant predictor of the net clinical benefits (hazard ratio: 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.83, P = 0.004). This result was consistent after propensity-score matching. In summary, our unique referral system contributed to long-term net clinical benefits for the secondary prevention of ischemic heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

There has been continuing discussion regarding the treatment strategy for acute type A intramural hematoma (IMH). Most patients are treated conservatively in Japan; hence, predicting fatal events and stratifying risks based on results normally obtained on hospital arrival are important. We aimed to examine the incidences and risk factors of death or need for surgery for acute type A IMH in patients receiving medical treatment and to identify high-risk patients using clinical findings on hospital arrival. From 2011 to 2016, 57 consecutive patients (mean age 72.5 years; male 36.8%) diagnosed with acute type A IMH who were receiving treatment at Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital were retrospectively included. Primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death and operation within 1 year after onset. To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the risk factors and risk score, we estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Mean follow-up duration was 621 days. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 129 mmHg. Computed tomography (CT) on arrival showed a mean ascending aorta diameter of 46 mm. Ulcer-like projection (ULP) in the ascending aorta and pericardial effusion (PE) were seen in 33% and 42% of cases, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (49.1%) reached the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, 7 cases [12.3%]; operation, 21 cases [36.8%]). In univariate analysis of admission values, the primary endpoint group had significantly lower SBP (113.0 ± 28.5 vs 144.3 ± 33.5 mmHg), higher ascending aorta diameter (49.5 ± 8.1 vs 43.6 ± 5.9 mm), and higher frequency of ULP (53.8% vs 13.8%) and PE (58.6% vs 25.0%) than the event-free group. Multivariate analysis showed that ULP on admission CT was a significant predictor of the primary endpoint. The risk score was considered using these risk factors. On admission, the primary endpoint could be predicted with 89.7% sensitivity and 75% specificity (area under the ROC curve 0.823) if the patient had ULP and/or > 2 of the following factors: SBP < 120 mmHg, ascending aorta diameter > 45 mm, and PE. SBP and CT findings on arrival were significantly associated with cardiovascular death and the need for surgery in patients with acute type A IMH receiving initial medical therapy. The novel risk score was useful for predicting cardiovascular death and surgery.

Introduction: Pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) can be considered as one clinical entity, venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the potential differences between PE and DVT might have to be taken into consideration for the decision-making of the optimal treatment strategies., Materials and Methods: The COMMAND VTE Registry is a multicenter registry enrolling 3027 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic VTE. The current study population consisted of 1715 PE patients with or without DVT and 1312 DVT only patients., Results: The adjusted risk for recurrent VTE was not significantly different between the PE and DVT only groups (HR 1.22, 95%CI 0.93-1.60, P = 0.15). PE patients developed recurrent VTE events more often as PE than as DVT only (62% and 38%). The adjusted excess mortality risk of PE patients relative to DVT only patients was significant (HR 1.29, 95%CI 1.11-1.50, P < 0.001), with markedly higher cumulative 30-day incidence of all-cause death in PE patients (6.4% and 1.4%, P < 0.001). The most frequent cause of deaths was cancer death in both groups, and second most frequent cause of deaths in PE patients was fatal PE, most of which developed within 30 days., Conclusions: The risk for recurrent VTE was not significantly different between PE and DVT, although PE was more likely to develop recurrent VTE as PE. The mortality risk of PE seemed to be higher than that of DVT, which was more remarkable in the short term due to PE death, and less remarkable in the long term due to cancer death., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Although a robust relationship between aberrant serum polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) profile and coronary artery disease (CAD) has been reported, the details concerning the association between aberrant PUFAs profile and clinical feature of CAD are not fully discovered. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between serum PUFAs and clinical profiles in CAD patients. We classified 595 consecutive CAD patients, who underwent coronary angiography into 3 groups according to the clinical profiles of CAD (group A: early phase ACS, n = 96; group B: stable CAD with previous history of ACS, n = 259; group C: stable CAD without previous history of ACS, n = 240) and measured serum n-3 [eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)] and n-6 [arachidonic acid (AA)] PUFAs. Serum EPA, DHA, and EPA/AA ratio were significantly low in the order of group A < B < C [EPA; 48.1 (34.1-60.3) μg/ml, 61.7 (41.2-94.5) μg/ml, and 74.4 (52.7-104.9) μg/ml, DHA; 113.1 (92.8-135.1) μg/ml, 125.8 (100.4-167.2) μg/ml, and 140.1 (114.7-177.0) μg/ml, EPA/AA ratio; 0.31 (0.22-0.45), 0.39 (0.26-0.62), and 0.44 (0.31-0.69), medians with interquartile range, p < 0.01]. Multiple regression analysis revealed that EPA (p = 0.009) and EPA/AA ratio (p = 0.023), but not DHA and DHA/AA ratio, were negatively associated with clinical profiles of ACS in CAD patients. Significant correlation was not observed between PUFAs profile and severity of coronary stenosis. Low serum EPA and EPA/AA ratio correlates with clinical profiles of ACS in patients with CAD, regardless of the extent and severity of coronary artery stenosis.

A 67-year-old man underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the left anterior descending artery. The major septal branch became occluded during coronary stenting. The patient developed dyspnea 19 days later. Chest radiography revealed lung congestion and a pleural effusion. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a basal ventricular septal rupture. Emergency coronary angiography did not reveal any in-stent restenosis, and the major septal branch remained occluded. Therefore, the patient underwent closure of the ventricular septal rupture. The postoperative period was uneventful, and he was discharged 29 days after the operation. Septal branch occlusion due to coronary stenting occasionally occurs during routine PCI for which recanalization is sometimes not attempted. However, this case demonstrates that occluded septal branches, although rare, may cause serious complications. < Learning objective: Rupture of the ventricular septum, a complication of acute myocardial infarction, is usually observed in the setting of acute myocardial infarction associated with major coronary artery occlusion. However, ventricular septal rupture associated with side branch occlusion due to coronary stenting for stable angina pectoris is uncommon. Awareness of this rare complication is useful during routine percutaneous coronary intervention.>.

A 37-year-old female who delivered her second child via a cesarean section 4 months previously presented to our hospital with gradual worsening of dyspnea on effort. Chest radiographic appearance showed cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic ratio 61%) and slight bilateral pulmonary congestion. Echocardiogram revealed diffuse hypokinesis of both left and right ventricles (left ventricular ejection fraction 29%) and large biventricular thrombus [left ventricular apex (28 mm × 21 mm, 22 mm × 14 mm) and right ventricular apex (16 mm × 11 mm)]. She was diagnosed as having peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) and anticoagulation therapy was started. Surgical thrombectomy was not selected because of risk of complications. Massive cerebral infarction occurred 10 days after diagnosis. She was discharged with aphasia and right incomplete hemiplegia 65 days after admission. Biventricular thrombus is a rare complication of PPCM. If high risk of massive embolism is considered, surgical thrombectomy may be warranted even in cases with low cardiac function. < Learning objective: Biventricular thrombus is a rare complication of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). We report a case of biventricular thrombus secondary to PPCM. The decision to perform prophylactic surgical approach to ventricular thrombus is difficult in cases with low cardiac function.>.

Objective: Sympathetic nervous and renin-angiotensin systems play important roles in essential hypertension. This study was aimed at assessing the effects of losartan or its combination with quinapril on the cardiac nervous system and neurohormonal status in essential hypertension., Design and Methods: Randomized, comparative study of 105 patients with mild essential hypertension, carried out at Shizuoka General Hospital. In phase 1, 40 hypertensives were allocated randomly into the losartan (50 mg) group or the quinapril (10 mg) group. In phase 2, 65 hypertensives, after 3 months 10 mg quinapril monotherapy, were allocated randomly into groups with 50 mg losartan (n = 32) or 5 mg amlodipine (n = 33) added to quinapril, and were treated for a further 3 months. All patients underwent [(123)I]metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging and neurohormonal measurements before and 3 months after treatment., Results: Both monotherapies significantly increased renin activity, while losartan monotherapy also increased angiotensin II (AII) concentration. In both the losartan and quinapril groups, the washout rate was significantly decreased (18.1 +/- 11.4 versus 13.9 +/- 11.0%, P < 0.0002 and 13.3 +/- 9.3 versus 12.3 +/- 9.1%, P < 00001, respectively) without changes in the heart to mediastinum ratio (H/M ratio). Both combined therapies lowered blood pressure to similar levels. A combination therapy with losartan and quinapril significantly increased the H/M ratio (1.93 +/- 0.29 and 2.02 +/- 0.29, P < 0.01) and decreased the washout rate (17.6 +/- 11.0 and 15.3 +/- 9.2%, P < 0.02) without affecting AII concentration, whereas a combination therapy with amlodipine and quinapril therapy did not affect the scintigraphic parameters with an increase in the AII concentration., Conclusions: With a usual antihypertensive dose, both losartan and quinapril had a little suppressive effect on the cardiac sympathetic activity in essential hypertension. In contrast, the combination therapy with losartan and quinapril, which results in a higher degree of inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system, could suppress the cardiac sympathetic activity effectively.