Search

Patient satisfaction during hospitalization for esophagectomy has been little studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction with a newly introduced enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for esophagectomy. At hospital discharge, patients were invited to complete a questionnaire. This pseudonymized questionnaire contained 5-point Likert scales regarding items on multidisciplinary care (n = 7), information/communication (n = 7), length of stay (n = 1), and specific adaptations of care in the ERP (n = 11). One open question asked for patient experiences and suggestions for improving the ERP. Between May 2017 and December 2021, 521 patients were included in the ERP after esophagectomy. Of them, 327 patients (63%) completed the questionnaire. Response rates were evenly distributed between genders and slightly higher in younger patients (<60 years; 68%) as compared to elderly patients (>70 years; 60%). Quantitative analysis revealed high satisfaction rates for multidisciplinary care (86.8%), information/communication (84.9%), and ERP adaptations (82.2%), and length of stay was considered optimal in 80%. There were no significant differences in satisfaction observed between gender nor age groups. For the qualitative analysis, there were 108 open answers, resulting in 268 statements. Sentiments expressed in these statements were evaluated as negative, positive, or unspecified. Negative sentiments were attributable to alimentation, organizational factors, and communication. Positive sentiments were attributed to interpersonal relations, multidisciplinary care, and ERP. Overall, patients are very satisfied with the ERP for esophagectomy during hospitalization. By incorporating qualitative data, the results of this quantitative analysis are expanded and elucidated, showing areas where improvements to our ERP are possible to increase patient satisfaction., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Reasons for structural and outcome differences in esophageal cancer surgery in Western Europe remain unclear. This questionnaire study aimed to identify differences in the organization of esophageal cancer surgical care in Western Europe. A cross-sectional international questionnaire study was conducted among upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeons from Western Europe. One surgeon per country was selected based on scientific output and active membership in the European Society for Diseases of the Esophagus or (inter)national upper GI committee. The questionnaire consisted of 51 structured questions on the structural organization of esophageal cancer surgery, surgical training, and clinical audit processes. Between October 2021 and October 2022, 16 surgeons from 16 European countries participated in this study. In 5 countries (31%), a volume threshold was present ranging from 10 to 26 annual esophagectomies, in 7 (44%) care was centralized in designated centers, and in 4 (25%) no centralizing regulations were present. The number of centers performing esophageal cancer surgery per country differed from 4 to 400, representing 0.5-4.9 centers per million inhabitants. In 4 countries (25%), esophageal cancer surgery was part of general surgical training and 8 (50%) reported the availability of upper GI surgery fellowships. A national audit for upper GI surgery was present in 8 (50%) countries. If available, all countries use the audit to monitor the quality of care. Substantial differences exist in the organization and centralization of esophageal cancer surgical care in Western Europe. The exchange of experience in the organizational aspects of care could further improve the results of esophageal cancer surgical care in Europe., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Introduction: The OligoMetastatic Esophagogastric Cancer (OMEC) project aims to provide clinical practice guidelines for the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of esophagogastric oligometastatic disease (OMD)., Methods: Guidelines were developed according to AGREE II and GRADE principles. Guidelines were based on a systematic review (OMEC-1), clinical case discussions (OMEC-2), and a Delphi consensus study (OMEC-3) by 49 European expert centers for esophagogastric cancer. OMEC identified patients for whom the term OMD is considered or could be considered. Disease-free interval (DFI) was defined as the time between primary tumor treatment and detection of OMD., Results: Moderate to high quality of evidence was found (i.e. 1 randomized and 4 non-randomized phase II trials) resulting in moderate recommendations. OMD is considered in esophagogastric cancer patients with 1 organ with ≤ 3 metastases or 1 involved extra-regional lymph node station. In addition, OMD continues to be considered in patients with OMD without progression in number of metastases after systemic therapy. 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging is recommended for baseline staging and for restaging after systemic therapy when local treatment is considered. For patients with synchronous OMD or metachronous OMD and a DFI ≤ 2 years, recommended treatment consists of systemic therapy followed by restaging to assess suitability for local treatment. For patients with metachronous OMD and DFI > 2 years, upfront local treatment is additionally recommended., Discussion: These multidisciplinary European clinical practice guidelines for the uniform definition, diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric OMD can be used to standardize inclusion criteria in future clinical trials and to reduce variation in treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. van Laarhoven reports a consultant or advisory role: Amphera, Anocca, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Boehringer, Daiichy-Sankyo, Dragonfly, MSD, Myeloid, Servier; Research funding, medication supply, and/or other research support: Auristone, Incyte, Merck, ORCA, Servier; Speaker role: Astellas, Beigene, Benecke, BMS, Daiichy-Sankyo, JAAP, Medtalks, Novartis, Springer, Travel Congress Management B.V. Dr. Muijs reports institutional grants from: Elekta, IBA, RaySearch, Siemens, Mirada, Bergoz Instrumentation and Medical Data Works, KWF, all outside the submitted work. Dr. van Hillegersberg has a consulting and advisory role at Intuitive Surgical, Medtronic, Olympus and J&J Ethicon. Dr. de Manzoni reports personal fees from Lilly, outside the submitted work. Dr. Gani reports travel grants from Elekta and departmental research cooperation, outside the submitted work. Dr. Smyth is supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Oxford (the views expressed in this Article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the Department of Health) and resports personal fees/grants from: Astra Zeneca, Beigene, BMS, Amal Therapeutics, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Servier, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Zymeworks, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Haj Mohammad reports consulation fees from: Merck, BMS, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, and research funding from Servier, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Adenis reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, personal fees from: BMS, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, non-financial support from Servier, grants from Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Lordick reports grants from: BMS and Gilead, personal fees from: Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, Incyte, Merck, MSD, Roche, Servier, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Slingerland reports an advisory role at BMS and Lilly. Dr. van Berge Henegouwen received researcher-initiated grant from Stryker and is consultant for Alesi Surgical, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, BBraun and Viatris. Dr Nilsson reports advisory roles for BMS and Medtronic. Dr. Tabernero reports personal financial interest in form of scientific consultancy role for Array Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Avvinity, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Ikena Oncology, IQVIA, Lilly, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, MSD, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Orion Biotechnology, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Taiho, Tessa Therapeutics and TheraMyc; and also educational collaboration with Imedex, Medscape Education, MJH Life Sciences, PeerView Institute for Medical Education and Physicians Education Resource (PER). Dr. Tabernero declares institutional financial interest in form of financial support for clinical trials or contracted research for Amgen Inc, Array Biopharma Inc, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Debiopharm International SA, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech Inc, HalioDX SAS, Hutchison MediPharma International, Janssen-Cilag SA, MedImmune, Menarini, Merck Health KGAA, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus NV, Mirati, Novartis Farmacéutica SA, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Sanofi Aventis Recherche & Développement, Servier, Taiho Pharma USA Inc, Spanish Association Against Cancer Scientific Foundation and Cancer Research UK. Dr. Nieuwenhuijzen reports advisory/speaker roles from Medtronic and Lilly. All remaining authors have declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Extended pleurectomy-decortication is a cytoreductive surgical treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Prolonged air leak remains a major postoperative challenge, lengthening hospital stay and increasing morbidity. In this video report, we present a stepwise approach for visceral decortication and introduce the concept of aerostasis by construction of an artificial neopleura. Our results suggest that improved aerostasis results in shortened air leak duration., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pleural neoplasms are rare and can be subdivided into pleural metastasis and primary pleural neoplasms. Non-mesothelioma primary pleural neoplasms are a diverse group of extremely rare pathologies., Case Presentation: In this case series, we describe the presentation and management of two rare primary pleural neoplasms. A first case describes a primary pleural yolk sac tumor treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, extended pleurectomy decortication, and hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy. In a second case we describe the management of a primary pleural synovial sarcoma by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy. A complete resection was obtained in both cases and the post-operative course was uncomplicated. No signs of tumor recurrence were noted during follow-up in the first patient. In the second patient a local recurrence was diagnosed 6 months after surgery., Conclusion: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by extensive thoracic surgery, including hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy, is a feasible treatment strategy for non-mesothelioma primary pleural neoplasms, but careful follow-up is required., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is an established therapeutic option for advanced emphysema. To improve patients' safety and reduce complications, an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) was implemented. This study aims to describe and evaluate the short-term outcome of this ERP., Methods: This retrospective single-centre study included all consecutive LVRS patients (1 January 2017 until 15 September 2020). An ERP for LVRS was implemented and stepwise optimised from 1 August 2019, it consisted of changes in pre-, peri- and postoperative care pathways. Patients were compared before and after implementation of ERP. Primary outcome was incidence of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo), and secondary outcomes included chest tube duration, incidence of prolonged air leak (PAL), length of stay (LOS) and 90-day mortality. Lung function and exercise capacity were evaluated at 3 and 6 months post-LVRS., Results: Seventy-six LVRS patients were included (pre-ERP: n=41, ERP: n=35). The ERP cohort presented with lower incidence of postoperative complications (42% vs 83%, P=0.0002), shorter chest tube duration (4 vs 12 days, P<0.0001) with a lower incidence of PAL (21% vs 61%, P=0.0005) and shorter LOS (6 vs 14 days, P<0.0001). No in-hospital mortality occurred in the ERP cohort versus 4 pre-ERP. Postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s was higher in the ERP cohort compared to pre-ERP at 3 months (1.35 vs 1.02 l) and at 6 months (1.31 vs 1.01 l)., Conclusions: Implementation of ERP as part of a comprehensive reconceptualisation towards LVRS, demonstrated fewer postoperative complications, including PAL, resulting in reduced LOS. Improved short-term functional outcomes were observed at 3 and 6 months., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lung transplantations are highly complex procedures, often conducted in frail patients. Through the addition of immunosuppressants, healing can be compromised, primarily leading to the development of bronchopleural fistulas. Although esophageal fistulas (EFs) after lung transplantation remain rare, they are associated with significant morbidity. We aimed to investigate the clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies of EF after lung transplantation., Methods: All patients who developed EF after lung transplantation at the University Hospitals Leuven between January 2019 and March 2022 were retrospectively reviewed and the clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies were summarized., Results: Among 212 lung transplantation patients, 5 patients (2.4%) developed EF. Three patients were male and median age was 39 y (range, 34-63). Intraoperative circulatory support was required in 3 patients, with 2 needing continued support postoperatively. Bipolar energy devices were consistently used for mediastinal hemostasis. All EFs were right-sided. Median time to diagnosis was 28 d (range, 12-48) and 80% of EFs presented as recurrent respiratory infections or empyema. Diagnosis was made through computed tomography (n = 3) or esophagogastroscopy (n = 2). Surgical repair with muscle flap covering achieved an 80% success rate. All patients achieved complete resolution, with only 1 patient experiencing a fatal outcome during a complicated EF-related recovery., Conclusion: Although EF after lung transplantation remains rare, vigilance is crucial, particularly in cases of right-sided intrathoracic infection. Moreover, caution must be exercised when applying thermal energy in the mediastinal area to prevent EF development and mitigate the risk of major morbidity. Timely diagnosis and surgical intervention can yield favorable outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Approximately 10-12% of patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer (OGC) present with oligometastatic disease at diagnosis. It remains unclear if there is a role for radical surgery in these patients. We aimed to assess the outcomes of OGC patients who underwent simultaneous treatment for the primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases. Patients with OGC who underwent surgical treatment between 2008 and 2020 for the primary tumour and up to five synchronous liver metastases aiming for complete tumour removal or ablation (i.e., no residual tumour) were identified from four institutional databases. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival and postoperative outcomes. Thirty-one patients were included, with complete follow-up data for 30 patients. Twenty-six patients (84%) received neoadjuvant therapy followed by response evaluation. Median OS was 21 months [IQR 9-36] with 2- and 5-year survival rates of 43% and 30%, respectively. While disease recurred in 80% of patients (20 of 25 patients) after radical resection, patients with a solitary liver metastasis had a median OS of 34 months. The number of liver metastases was a prognostic factor for OS (solitary metastasis aHR 0.330; p -value = 0.025). Thirty-day mortality was zero and complications occurred in 55% of patients. Long-term survival can be achieved in well-selected patients who undergo surgical resection of the primary tumour and local treatment of synchronous liver metastases. In particular, patients with a solitary liver metastasis seem to have a favourable prognosis.

Competing Interests: The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.

Background: In Belgium, no publicly available information exists on the spread, quality, results nor follow-up of antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery, in contrast to the recently centralized esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to create a snap shot of the current practice in Belgium., Methods: An online questionnaire was distributed among all members of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery in autumn 2021. A total of 33 questions spread over four sections were asked, covering demographics, current practice (case load, case mix, indications, preoperative workup, patient information, average length of stay, follow up, quality of life (QOL)), operative techniques and future thoughts., Results: Twenty-four surgeons completed the questionnaire. Surgical indications are discussed multidisciplinary and based on guidelines in 67%. Workup includes endoscopy, pH-monitoring and manometry in 100%. Barium swallow, impedance and gastric emptying tests were added in respectively 83%, 42% and 13%. Symptom or QOL scores were used in 17%. About 81% are performed as primary surgery, 18% redo surgery and 1% resections. Laparoscopic procedures are reported in 99%: Nissen(-Rosetti) 79%, Toupet/Lind 15%, partial gastrectomy 5% and Collis gastroplasty 1%. Discharge is planned on POD1 in 42% and on POD2 in 54%. 50% performs follow-up < 1 year. Interest in further clinical research collaboration was expressed in 92%., Conclusion: Antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery is not standardized in Belgium. There is an evident variety in clinical practice, but this questionnaire shows similarity amongst respondents regarding workup and surgical approach. There is a willingness for future research collaborations.

Background: Studies have shown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) to be a feasible surgical technique in treating esophageal carcinoma. Postoperative complications have been extensively reviewed, but literature focusing on intraoperative complications is limited. The main objective of this study was to report major intraoperative complications and 90-day mortality during MIE for cancer., Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from 10 European esophageal surgery centers. All intention-to-treat, minimally invasive laparoscopic/thoracoscopic esophagectomies with gastric conduit reconstruction for esophageal and GE junction cancers operated on between 2003 and 2019 were reviewed. Major intraoperative complications were defined as loss of conduit, erroneous transection of vascular structures, significant injury to other organs including bowel, heart, liver or lung, splenectomy, or other major complications including intubation injuries, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction., Results: Amongst 2862 MIE cases we identified 98 patients with 101 intraoperative complications. Vascular injuries were the most prevalent, 41 during laparoscopy and 19 during thoracoscopy, with injuries to 18 different vessels. There were 24 splenic vascular or capsular injuries, 11 requiring splenectomies. Four losses of conduit due to gastroepiploic artery injury and six bowel injuries were reported. Eight tracheobronchial lesions needed repair, and 11 patients had significant lung parenchyma injuries. There were 2 on-table deaths. Ninety-day mortality was 9.2%., Conclusions: This study offers an overview of the range of different intraoperative complications during minimally invasive esophagectomy. Mortality, especially from intrathoracic vascular injuries, appears significant., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Different surgical techniques exist in the treatment of giant and complex hiatal hernia. The aim of this study was to identify the role of the Belsey Mark IV (BMIV) antireflux procedure in the era of minimally invasive techniques., Methods: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted. All patients who underwent an elective BMIV procedure aged 18 years or older, during a 15-year period (January 1, 2002 until December 31, 2016), were included. Demographics, pre-, per- and postoperative data were analyzed. Three groups were compared. Group A: BMIV as first procedure-group B: BMIV as a second procedure (first redo intervention)-group C: patients who had two or more previous antireflux interventions., Results: A total of 216 patients were included for analysis (group A n = 127; group B n = 51; group C n = 38). Median follow-up in groups A, B and C was 28, 48 and 56 months, respectively. Patients in group A were older and had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score compared to groups B and C. There was zero mortality in all groups. The severe complication rate of 7.9% in group A was higher compared with the 2.9% in group B and 3.9% in group C. Long-term outcome showed true recurrence, defined as both radiographic recurrence as well as associated symptoms, in 9.5% of cases in group A, 24.5% in group B and 44.7% in group C., Conclusions: The BMIV procedure is a safe procedure with good results, moreover in the aging and comorbid patient with primary repair of a giant hiatal hernia., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Trimodality treatment, i.e., neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery, for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) improves overall survival but also increases the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Here, we tried to identify a relation between dose to functional lung volumes (FLV) as determined by 4D-CT scans in EC patients and treatment-related lung toxicity., Materials and Methods: All patients with EC undergoing trimodality treatment between 2017 and 2022 in UZ Leuven and scanned with 4D-CT-simulation were selected. FLVs were determined based on Jacobian determinants of deformable image registration between maximum inspiration and expiration phases. Dose/volume parameters of the anatomical lung volume (ALV) and FLV were compared between patients with versus without postoperative pulmonary complications. Results of pre- and post-nCRT pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were collected and compared in relation to radiation dose., Results: Twelve out of 51 EC patients developed postoperative pulmonary complications. ALV was smaller while FLV10Gy and FLV20Gy were larger in patients with complications (respectively 3141 ± 858mL vs 3601 ± 635mL, p  = 0.025; 360 ± 216mL vs 264 ± 139mL, p  = 0.038; 166 ± 106mL vs 118 ± 63mL, p  = 0.030). No differences in ALV dose-volume parameters were detected. Baseline FEV1 and TLC were significantly lower in patients with complications (respectively 90 ± 17%pred vs 102 ± 20%pred, p  = 0.033 and 93 ± 17%pred vs 110 ± 13%pred, p  = 0.001), though no other PFTs were significantly different between both groups. DLCO was the only PFT that had a meaningful decrease after nCRT (85 ± 17%pred vs 68 ± 15%pred, p  < 0.001) but was not related to dose to ALV/FLV., Conclusion: Small ALV and increasing FLV exposed to intermediate (10 to 20 Gy) dose are associated to postoperative pulmonary complications. Changes of DLCO occur during nCRT but do not seem to be related to radiation dose to ALV or FLV. This information could attribute towards toxicity risk prediction and reduction strategies for EC.

Background: The current gold standard for treatment of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. The shift toward neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) was driven by the Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) trial. This study reassessed, in daily practice, the presumed advantage of nCRT followed by surgery on long-term survival compared with primary surgery, in a group of all adenocarcinomas treated through a transthoracic approach with extensive 2-field lymphadenectomy., Methods: This retrospective cohort study with propensity score-matched analysis included all surgically treated patients between 2000 and 2018 with locally advanced adenocarcinoma (cT1/2 N+ or cT3/4 N0/+). For appropriate comparison, exclusion criteria of the CROSS trial were applied. Patients were matched on age, Charlson comorbidity score, clinical tumor length, and lymph node status. The primary end point was 5-year overall survival., Results: There were 473 eligible patients who underwent primary surgery (225 patients) or nCRT + surgery (248 patients). After propensity score-matched analysis, 149 matched cases were defined in each group for analysis. There was no significant difference after 5 years between the matched groups in median overall survival (32.5 and 35.0 months, P = .41) and median disease-free survival (14.3 and 13.5 months, P = .16). nCRT was associated with significantly more postoperative complications (mean Comprehensive Complication Index score: 21.0 vs 30.5, P < .0001) and longer mean stay in the hospital (14.0 vs 18.2 days, P = .05) and intensive care unit (11.7 vs 37.7 days, P = .05)., Conclusions: Our propensity score-matched results indicate that primary surgery, performed through transthoracic approach with extensive 2-field lymphadenectomy, can offer a comparable overall and disease-free survival after 5 years, with potentially fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospital and intensive care unit stay compared with nCRT followed by surgery., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Brain metastases after esophagectomy are rare. Moreover, a diagnostic uncertainty remains as pathology is rarely obtained and radiological features can show similarities to primary brain tumors. Our aim was to demonstrate the diagnostic uncertainty and identify risk factors associated with brain tumors (BT) after esophagectomy with curative intent., Methods: All patients who underwent an esophagectomy with curative intent from 2000 to 2019 were reviewed. Diagnostics and characteristics of BT were analyzed. Multivariable logistic and cox regression were performed to determine factors associated with development of BT and survival, respectively., Results: In total, 2131 patients underwent esophagectomy with curative intent, of which 72 patients (3.4%) developed BT. Pathological diagnosis was obtained in 26 patients (1.2%), of which 2 patients were diagnosed with glioblastoma. On multivariate analysis, radiotherapy (OR, 7.71; 95%CI: 2.66-22.34, p < 0.001) was associated with an increased risk of BT and early-stage tumors (OR, 0.29; 95%CI: 0.10-0.90, p = 0.004) with a decreased risk of BT. Median overall survival was 7.4 months (95%CI: 4.80-9.96). BT treated with curative intent (surgery or stereotactic radiation) had a significantly better median overall survival (16 months; 95%CI: 11.3-20.7) compared to those without (3.7 months; 95%CI: 0.9-6.6, p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Advanced stage tumors and radiotherapy seem related to the development of brain tumors after esophagectomy with curative intent. However, an important diagnostic uncertainty remains in these patients as pathological diagnosis is only obtained in a minority of cases. Tissue confirmation can be useful to inform a patient-tailored multimodality treatment strategy in select patient., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To describe our experience with lung transplantation (LTx) from donors ≥70 years and compare short and long-term outcomes to a propensity-matched cohort of donors <70 years., Background: Although extended-criteria donors have been widely used to enlarge the donor pool, the experience with LTx from older donors (≥70 years) remains limited., Methods: All single-center bilateral LTx between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Matching (1:1) was performed for the donor (type, sex, smoking history, x-ray abnormalities, partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, and time on ventilator) and recipient characteristics (age, sex, LTx indication, perioperative extracorporeal life support, and cytomegalovirus mismatch). Primary graft dysfunction grade-3, 5-year patient, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival were analyzed., Results: Out of 647 bilateral LTx, 69 were performed from donors ≥70 years. The mean age in the older donor cohort was 74 years (range: 70-84 years) versus 49 years (range: 12-69 years) in the matched younger group. No significant differences were observed in the length of ventilatory support, intensive care unit, or hospital stay. Primary graft dysfunction-3 was 26% in the older group versus 29% in younger donor recipients ( P = 0.85). Reintervention rate was comparable (29% vs 16%; P = 0.10). Follow-up bronchoscopy revealed no difference in bronchial anastomotic complications ( P = 1.00). Five-year patient and chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survivals were 73.6% versus 73.1% ( P = 0.72) and 51.5% versus 59.2% ( P = 0.41), respectively., Conclusions: LTx from selected donors ≥70 years is feasible and safe, yielding comparable short and long-term outcomes in a propensity-matched analysis with younger donors (<70 years)., Competing Interests: R.V. is supported as a senior clinical research fellow by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) Belgium. G.M.V. and D.V.R. are supported by the Broere Charitable Foundation. L.J.C. is supported by a KU Leuven University Chair funded by Medtronic, a post-doctoral grant from the University Hospitals Leuven (KOOR—UZ Leuven) and a research project from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) Belgium (G090922N). The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Local treatment improves the outcomes for oligometastatic disease (OMD, i.e. an intermediate state between locoregional and widespread disseminated disease). However, consensus about the definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a multidisciplinary European consensus statement on the definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer., Methods: In total, 65 specialists in the multidisciplinary treatment for oesophagogastric cancer from 49 expert centres across 16 European countries were requested to participate in this Delphi study. The consensus finding process consisted of a starting meeting, 2 online Delphi questionnaire rounds and an online consensus meeting. Input for Delphi questionnaires consisted of (1) a systematic review on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer and (2) a discussion of real-life clinical cases by multidisciplinary teams. Experts were asked to score each statement on a 5-point Likert scale. The agreement was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%-75%) or consensus (≥75%)., Results: A total of 48 experts participated in the starting meeting, both Delphi rounds, and the consensus meeting (overall response rate: 71%). OMD was considered in patients with metastatic oesophagogastric cancer limited to 1 organ with ≤3 metastases or 1 extra-regional lymph node station (consensus). In addition, OMD was considered in patients without progression at restaging after systemic therapy (consensus). For patients with synchronous or metachronous OMD with a disease-free interval ≤2 years, systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment was considered as treatment (consensus). For metachronous OMD with a disease-free interval >2 years, either upfront local treatment or systemic treatment followed by restaging was considered as treatment (fair agreement)., Conclusion: The OMEC project has resulted in a multidisciplinary European consensus statement for the definition, diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma and squamous cell cancer. This can be used to standardise inclusion criteria for future clinical trials., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. van Laarhoven reports grants or advisory/speaker role from: Astellas, BMS, Dragonfly, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Nordic Pharma, Servier; research funding or medical supply from: Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Incyte, Lilly, Merck, Nordic Pharma, Philips, Roche, Servier; and has received unrestricted research funding (non-commercial) from: Dutch Cancer Society, NWO/ZonMw, European Research Council, MaagLeverDarm Stichting. Dr. Muijs reports institutional grants from: Elekta, IBA, RaySearch, Siemens, Mirada, Bergoz Instrumentation and Medical Data Works, KWF, all outside the submitted work. Dr. van Hillegersberg has a consulting and advisory role at Intuitive Surgical. Dr. de Manzoni reports personal fees from Lilly, outside the submitted work. Dr. Gani reports travel grants from Elekta and departmental research cooperation, outside the submitted work. Dr. Smyth reports personal fees/grants from: Astra Zeneca, Beigene, BMS, Amal Therapeutics, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Servier, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Zymeworks, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Haj Mohammad reports consulation fees from: Merck, BMS, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, and research funding from Servier, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Adenis reports grants and personal fees from Bayer, personal fees and non-fianciel support from MSD, personal fees from: BMS, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, non-financial support from Servier, grants from Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Lordick reports grants from: BMS and Gilead, personal fees from: Amgen, Astellas, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, Incyte, Merck, MSD, Roche, Servier, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Slingerland reports an advisory role at BMS and Lilly. Dr. van Berge Henegouwen received researcher-initiated grant from Stryker and is consultant for Alesi Surgical, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Braun and Mylan. Dr Nilsson reports advisory roles for BMS and Medtronic. All remaining authors have declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is one of the most feared complications, which results in increased morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a powered circular stapler on complications after esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for esophageal cancer. Between May 2019 and July 2021, all consecutive oesophagectomies for cancer with intrathoracic anastomosis in a high-volume center were included in this retrospective study. Surgeons were free to choose either a manual or a powered circular stapler. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative complications were recorded in a prospective database, according to EsoData. Propensity score matching (age, body mass index, Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance and neoadjuvant therapy) was conducted to reduce potential confounding. We included 128 patients. Powered and manual circular staplers were used in 62 and 66 patients, respectively. Fewer anastomotic leakages were observed with the powered stapler group (OR = 7.3 (95%CI: 1.58-33.7); [3.2% (n = 2) vs 19.7% (n = 13), respectively; p = 0.004]). After propensity score matching, this remained statistically significant (OR = 8.5 (95%CI: 1.80-40.1); [4.1% (n = 2) vs 20.4% (n = 10), respectively; p = 0.013]). Additionally, anastomotic diameter was significantly higher with the powered stapler (median: 29 mm (63.3%) vs 25 mm (57.1%), respectively; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in comprehensive complication index (p = 0.146). A decreased mean length of stay was observed in the powered stapler group (11.1 vs 18.7 days respectively; p = 0.022). Postoperative anastomotic leakage after esophageal resection was significantly reduced after the introduction of the powered circular stapler, consequently resulting in a reduced length of stay. Further evaluation on long-term strictures and quality of life are warranted to support these results., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Background: Esophageal cancer surgery outcomes benefit from higher hospital volumes. Despite the evidence, organization of national health care often is complex and depends on various factors. The volume-outcome results of this population-based study supported national health policy measures regarding concentration of esophageal resections in Belgium., Methods: The Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR) database was linked to administrative data on cancer treatment. All Belgian patients with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer in 2008-2018 undergoing resection were allocated to the hospital at which surgery was performed. The study assessed hospital volume association with 90-day mortality and 5-year overall survival, classifying average annual hospital volume of resections as low (LV, <6), medium (MV, 6-19), or high (HV, ≥20) and as a continuous covariate in the regression models., Results: The study included 4156 patients who had surgery in 79 hospitals (2 HV hospitals [37% of all surgeries], 12 MV hospitals [30% of all surgeries], and 65 LV hospitals [33% of all surgeries]). Adjusted 90-day mortality in HV hospitals was lower than in LV hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.21-0.65; p = 0.001). Case-mix adjusted 5-year survival was superior in HV versus LV (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.31-0.60; p < 0.001). The continuous model demonstrated a lower 90-day mortality (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71; p = 0.002) and a superior 5-year survival (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.33-0.63; p < 0.001) in hospitals with volumes of 40 or more resections annually., Conclusion: Population-based data from the BCR confirmed a strong volume-outcome association for esophageal resections. Improved 5-year survival in centers with annual volumes of 20 or more resections was driven mainly by the achievement of superior 90-day mortality. These findings supported centralization of esophageal resections in Belgium., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Optimal treatment for thymoma with pleural dissemination (TPD) remains unclear. Extended radical resection is the cornerstone for local treatment but the need for pleuro-pneumonectomy is debatable. Cytoreductive surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) provides an alternative strategy to reduce tumor load and prevent pleural recurrence., Objective: The aim of this review was to provide an overview of current literature regarding HITHOC for TPD., Methods: A systematic literature review (PRISMA) was performed in the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Web of Science databases, resulting in 154 papers selected for screening (PROSPERO: CRD42020208242). Title, abstract, and full-text screening resulted in 13 papers subjected to structured data extraction and methodological quality assessment. One additional case from our department was included. Inclusion criteria were original research reporting on patients diagnosed with TPD; oncological outcome reporting; intraoperative HITHOC; and papers written in English, Dutch or German. Methodological quality was assessed using the Risk-of-Bias (RoB)-2 Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale., Results: HITHOC for TPD was reported in 171 cases. HITHOC-related mortality was absent and morbidity was reported in three cases. Intrathoracic perfusion of a platinum-derivative, often combined with other chemotherapeutic drugs at >40°C for 60 min or longer was always used. Post-HITHOC recurrence was reported in 37/120 cases (31%). In patients with a minimal 1-year follow-up, average time to recurrence was 68.5 months., Conclusion: Combining cytoreductive surgery and HITHOC is feasible and safe for TPD. The strong heterogeneity in the literature impedes proper outcome analysis. More research is needed to better understand the additional benefit of HITHOC in the TPD setting., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: A uniform definition and treatment for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer is currently lacking. However, a comprehensive definition of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer is necessary to initiate studies on local treatment strategies (e.g. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy) and new systemic therapy agents in this group of patients. For this purpose, the OligoMetastatic Esophagogastric Cancer (OMEC) project was established. The OMEC-project aims to develop a multidisciplinary European consensus statement on the definition, diagnosis, and treatment for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer and provide a framework for prospective studies to improve outcomes of these patients., Methods: The OMEC-project consists of five studies, including 1) a systematic review on definitions and outcomes of oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer; 2) real-life clinical scenario discussions in multidisciplinary expert teams to determine the variation in the definition and treatment strategies; 3) Delphi consensus process through a starting meeting, two Delphi questionnaire rounds, and a consensus meeting; 4) publication of a multidisciplinary European consensus statement; and 5) a prospective clinical trial in patients with oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer., Discussion: The OMEC project aims to establish a multidisciplinary European consensus statement for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer and aims to initiate a prospective clinical trial to improve outcomes for these patients. Recommendations from OMEC can be used to update the relevant guidelines on treatment for patients with (oligometastatic) esophagogastric cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Hawkins reports grants from NIHRBiomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, outside the submitted work; Dr. Smyth reports personal fees from AMAL Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Five Prime Therapeutics, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Servier and Zymeworks and institutional funding for clinical trials research from Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Basilea, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche, Macrogenics and MSD. Dr. Moehler reports grants and non-financial support from EORTC, grants and non-financial support from AIO, grants and non-financial support from German Cancer Aid, grants and non-financial support from BMBF, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Falk Foundation, personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Amgen, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from MCI Group, personal fees from Taiho, outside the submitted work; Dr. van Laarhoven reports consultant or advisory role: BMS, Dragonfly, Lilly, Merck, Nordic Pharma, Servier, outside the submitted work; research funding and/or medication supply: Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Incyte, Lilly, Merck, Nordic Pharma, Philips, Roche, Servier, outside the submitted work; Dr. van Hillegersberg is proctor for Intuitive Surgical and consultant for Medtronic, the other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is currently a lack of evidence-based guidelines regarding surveillance for recurrence after esophageal and gastric (OG) cancer surgical resection, and which symptoms should prompt endoscopic or radiological investigations for recurrence. The aim of this study was to develop a core symptom set using a modified Delphi consensus process that should guide clinicians to carry out investigations to look for suspected recurrent OG cancer in previously asymptomatic patients., Methods: A web-based survey of 42 questions was sent to surgeons performing OG cancer resections at high volume centers. The first section evaluated the structure of follow-up and the second, determinants of follow-up. Two rounds of a modified Delphi consensus process and a further consensus workshop were used to determine symptoms warranting further investigations. Symptoms with a 75% consensus agreement as suggestive of recurrent cancer were included in the core symptom set., Results: 27 surgeons completed the questionnaires. A total of 70.3% of centers reported standardized surveillance protocols, whereas 3.7% of surgeons did not undertake any surveillance in asymptomatic patients after OG cancer resection. In asymptomatic patients, 40.1% and 25.9% of centers performed routine imaging and endoscopy, respectively. The core set that reached consensus, consisted of eight symptoms that warranted further investigations included; dysphagia to solid food, dysphagia to liquids, vomiting, abdominal pain, chest pain, regurgitation of foods, unexpected weight loss and progressive hoarseness of voice., Conclusion: There is global variation in monitoring patients after OG cancer resection. Eight symptoms were identified by the consensus process as important in prompting radiological or endoscopic investigation for suspected recurrent malignancy. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to link surveillance strategies to survival outcomes and evaluate prognostic value., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a major obstacle after lung transplantation (LTx), associated with increased early morbidity and mortality. Studies in liver and kidney transplantation revealed prolonged anastomosis time (AT) as an independent risk factor for impaired short- and long-term outcomes. We investigated if AT during LTx is a risk factor for PGD. In this retrospective single-center cohort study, we included all first double lung transplantations between 2008 and 2016. The association of AT with any PGD grade 3 (PGD3) within the first 72 h post-transplant was analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Data on AT and PGD was available for 427 patients of which 130 (30.2%) developed PGD3. AT was independently associated with the development of any PGD3 ≤72 h in uni- (odds ratio [OR] per 10 min 1.293, 95% confidence interval [CI 1.136-1.471], p < .0001) and multivariable (OR 1.205, 95% CI [1.022-1.421], p = .03) logistic regression analysis. There was no evidence that the relation between AT and PGD3 differed between lung recipients from donation after brain death versus donation after circulatory death donors. This study identified AT as an independent risk factor for the development of PGD3 post-LTx. We suggest that the implantation time should be kept short and the lung cooled to decrease PGD-related morbidity and mortality post-LTx., (© 2022 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Background: Consensus about the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer is lacking., Objective: To assess the definition and treatment of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer across multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) in Europe., Material and Methods: European expert centers (n = 49) were requested to discuss 15 real-life cases in their MDT with at least a medical, surgical, and radiation oncologist present. The cases varied in terms of location and number of metastases, histology, timing of detection (i.e. synchronous versus metachronous), primary tumour treatment status, and response to systemic therapy. The primary outcome was the agreement in the definition of oligometastatic disease at diagnosis and after systemic therapy. The secondary outcome was the agreement in treatment strategies. Treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease were categorised into upfront local treatment (i.e. metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy), systemic therapy followed by restaging to consider local treatment or systemic therapy alone. The agreement across MDTs was scored to be either absent/poor (<50%), fair (50%-75%), or consensus (≥75%)., Results: A total of 47 MDTs across 16 countries fully discussed the cases (96%). Oligometastatic disease was considered in patients with 1-2 metastases in either the liver, lung, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, adrenal gland, soft tissue or bone (consensus). At follow-up, oligometastatic disease was considered after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy when no progression or progression in size only of the oligometastatic lesion(s) was seen (consensus). If at restaging after a median of 18 weeks of systemic therapy the number of lesions progressed, this was not considered as oligometastatic disease (fair agreement). There was no consensus on treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease., Conclusion: A broad consensus on definitions of oligometastatic oesophagogastric cancer was found among MDTs of oesophagogastric cancer expert centres in Europe. However, high practice variability in treatment strategies exists., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Gani reports a research collaboration and travel expenses from Elekta outside the submitted work; Dr. Hawkins reports grants from NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, outside the submitted work; Dr. Smyth reports personal fees from AMAL Therapeutics, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Five Prime Therapeutics, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Servier and Zymeworks and institutional funding for clinical trials research from Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Basilea, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche, Macrogenics and MSD. Dr. Moehler reports grants and non-financial support from EORTC, grants and non-financial support from AIO, grants and non-financial support from German Cancer Aid, grants and non-financial support from BMBF, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Falk Foundation, personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Amgen, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from MCI Group, personal fees from Taiho, outside the submitted work; Dr. van Laarhoven reports other from BMS, other from Lilly, other from MSD, other from Nordic Pharma, other from Servier, other from Bayer, outside the submitted work; the other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Large studies comparing totally minimally invasive oesophagectomy (TMIE) with laparoscopically assisted (hybrid) oesophagectomy are lacking. Although randomized trials have compared TMIE invasive with open oesophagectomy, daily clinical practice does not always resemble the results reported in such trials. The aim of the present study was to compare complications after totally minimally invasive, hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer., Methods: The study was performed using data from the International Esodata Study Group registered between February 2015 and December 2019. The primary outcome was pneumonia, and secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage, (major) complications, duration of hospital stay, escalation of care, and 90-day mortality. Data were analysed using multivariable multilevel models., Results: Some 8640 patients were included between 2015 and 2019. Patients undergoing TMIE had a lower incidence of pneumonia than those having hybrid (10.9 versus 16.3 per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0.56, 95 per cent c.i. 0.40 to 0.80) or open (10.9 versus 17.4 per cent; OR 0.60, 0.42 to 0.84) oesophagectomy, and had a shorter hospital stay (median 10 (i.q.r. 8-16) days versus 14 (11-19) days (P = 0.041) and 11 (9-16) days (P = 0.027) respectively). The rate of anastomotic leakage was higher after TMIE than hybrid (15.1 versus 10.7 per cent; OR 1.47, 1.01 to 2.13) or open (15.1 versus 7.3 per cent; OR 1.73, 1.26 to 2.38) procedures., Conclusion: Compared with hybrid and open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy, TMIE resulted in a lower pneumonia rate, a shorter duration of hospital stay, but higher anastomotic leakage rates. Therefore, no clear advantage was seen for either TMIE, hybrid or open Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy when performed in daily clinical practice., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.)

Aim: Pleural dissemination of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is an extremely rare diagnosis, for which no standard therapy is available. Methods: We describe the successful treatment of a 67-year-old male diagnosed with left-sided intrapleural dissemination of PMP (low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm), 2 years after treatment of abdominal PMP with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of extended pleural decortication (ePD) and oxaliplatin-based hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC). The patient is doing well without complications or signs of recurrence, 26 months after thoracic surgery. Conclusion: ePD in combination with HITHOC is a valuable treatment for thoracic PMP.

Introduction: Patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEC) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or Epstein Barr Virus positivity (EBV+) might be good candidates for immunotherapy. Incidences of about 10% have been reported for both features, but are dependent on geographical region and disease stage., Aim: The aim is to study the prevalence of MSI-H and EBV+ in a Belgian single center cohort of patients with GEC., Methods: We retrospectively assessed the files of all patients with a newly diagnosed GEC between August, 1st 2018 and February, 29th 2020 at the University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status was determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). EBV+ was assessed using in situ hybridization (ISH). A case report is provided to illustrate the importance of testing for MSI in GEC., Results: 247 gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas were included in this analysis. 62 (56% stage IV) of those were tested for EBV, but only 1 turned out to be EBV positive (1.6%). 116 patients (44.0% stage IV) were tested for MSI, of which 11 were MSI-H (9.5%). Half of the MSI-H tumors identified were at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). A patient with MSI-H metastatic GEC obtained a complete response with nivolumab, which persisted after discontinuation of treatment., Conclusion: While we confirm that about 10% of GECs are MSI-H, the incidence of EBV+ in our cohort (1.6%) is clearly lower than expected. Given the important prognostic and predictive implications, every gastroesophageal cancer should be tested for MSI., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest, (© Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica.)

The technique for bronchial stump suturing following lung resection which is currently applied in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at the University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium owes its name to the Dutch surgeon Dr. Klinkenbergh (1891-1985). A true pioneer of cardiothoracic surgery in Europe, Dr. Klinkenbergh dedicated himself to the surgical treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. His work was praised by his peers for his precision and the reasoning behind every gesture. The Klinkenbergh technique consists in performing two running sutures which cross each other 'in the same manner as the laces of a shoe' to close the bronchus, limiting the occurrence of broncho-pleural fistulas. In our experience with more than 100 patients in the last 5 years (2016-2020) who underwent open pneumonectomy for benign or malignant disease, less than 2% developed post-operative broncho-pleural fistulas.

Background: Tumor response and lymph node involvement are the most important prognosticators in resected patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). We hypothesize that lymph node response (LNR) is also a valuable prognosticator in these patients, potentially revealing the added effect of nCRT., Methods: Hematoxylin and eosin slides of 193 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with clinical suspicion of lymph node involvement (cN+) and treated with nCRT between 2008 and 2015 were assessed. Lymph nodes containing viable tumor cells were considered ypN+, and those negative for viable tumor were ypN0. LNR was also described according to an earlier defined method. Three groups were obtained: ypN0/LNR-, ypN0/LNR+, and ypN+. They were compared with 188 cN+ patients being pN0 (n = 45) or pN+ (n = 143) after upfront esophageal resection., Results: Forty-four patients were ypN0/LNR-, 55 were ypN0/LNR+, and 94 were ypN+. Median overall survival was 96.4, 31.2, and 20.6 months, respectively, and was significantly different between ypN0/LNR- and ypN0/LNR+ groups (P = .020). Survival was comparable between ypN0/LNR- and pN0 (104.2 months) groups (P = .519) and between ypN+ and pN+ (21.6 months) groups (P = .966). In ypN0 patients, risk of death in LNR+ patients was tripled compared with LNR- patients., Conclusions: In cN+ esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with nCRT with postoperative final pathology being ypN0, median overall survival is tripled when no signs of LNR were found and comparable to cN+/pN0 upfront esophagectomy patients, suggesting that 23% of patients treated with nCRT were in fact true N0 and overtreated by nCRT. ypN+ patients have no survival benefit compared with pN+ patients., (Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Esophagectomy is a technically challenging procedure, associated with significant morbidity. The introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has reduced postoperative morbidity., Objective: Although the short-term effect on complications is increasingly being recognized, the impact on long-term survival remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between postoperative complications following MIE and long-term survival., Methods: Data were collected from the EsoBenchmark Collaborative composed by 13 high-volume, expert centers routinely performing MIE. Patients operated between June 1, 2011 and May 31, 2016 were included. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification. To correct for short-term effects of postoperative complications on mortality, patients who died within 90 days postoperative were excluded. Primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival., Results: A total of 915 patients were included with a mean follow-up time of 30.8 months (standard deviation 17.9). Complications occurred in 542 patients (59.2%) of which 50.2% had a CD grade ≥III complication [ie, (re)intervention, organ dysfunction, or death]. The incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) was 135 of 915 patients (14.8%) of which 84 patients were classified as a CD grade ≥III. Multivariable analysis showed a significantly deteriorated long-term survival in all patients with AL [hazard ratio (HR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.24]. This inverse relation was most distinct when AL was scored as a CD grade ≥III (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.30-2.58). For all other complications, no significant association with long-term survival was found., Conclusion: The occurrence and severity of AL, but not overall complications, after MIE negatively affect long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In recent years, minimally invasive Ivor Lewis (IL) esophagectomy with high intrathoracic anastomosis has emerged as surgical standard of care for esophageal cancer in expert centers. Alongside this process, many divergent technical aspects of this procedure have been devised in different centers. This study aims at achieving international consensus on the surgical steps of IL reconstruction using Delphi methodology., Methods: The expert panel consisted of specialized esophageal surgeons from 8 European countries. During a two-round Delphi process, a detailed analysis and consensus on key steps of intrathoracic gastric tube reconstruction (IL esophagectomy) was performed., Results: Response rates in Delphi rounds 1 and 2 were 100% (22 of 22 experts) and 83.3% (20 of 24 experts), respectively. Three essential technical areas of intrathoracic gastric tube reconstruction were identified: first, vascularization of the gastric conduit, second, gastric mobilization, tube formation and pull-up, and third, anastomotic technique. In addition, 3 main techniques for minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis are currently practiced: (i) end-to-side circular stapled, (ii) end-to-side double stapling, and (iii) side-to-side linear stapled technique. The step-by-step procedural analysis unveiled common approaches but also different expert practice., Conclusion: This precise technical description may serve as a clinical guideline for intrathoracic reconstruction after esophagectomy. In addition, the results may aid to harmonize the technical evolution of this complex surgical procedure and thereby facilitate surgical training., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) have the potential to improve clinical outcomes. Aim of this study was to determine the impact of ERP on perioperative results as compared with traditional care (TC) after esophagectomy. In this study, two cohorts were compared. Cohort 1 represented 296 patients to whom TC was provided. Cohort 2 consisted of 200 unselected ERP patients. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints were the length of stay and 30-day readmission rates. To confirm the possible impact of ERP, a propensity matched analysis (1:1) was conducted. A significant decrease in complications was found in ERP patients, especially for pneumonia and respiratory failure requiring reintubation (39% in TC and 14% in ERP; P<0.0001 and 17% vs. 12%; P<0.0001, respectively) and postoperative blood transfusion (26.7%-11%; P<0.0001). Furthermore, median length of stay was also significantly shorter: 13 days (interquartile range [IQR] 10-23) in TC compared with 10 days (IQR 8-14) in ERP patients (P<0.0001). The 30-day readmission rate (5.4% in TC and 9% in ERP; P=0.121) and in-hospital mortality rate (4.4% in TC and 2.5% in ERP; P=0.270) were not significantly affected. A propensity score matching confirmed a significant impact on pneumonia (P=0.0001), anastomotic leak (P=0.047), several infectious complications (P=0.01-0.034), blood transfusion (P=0.001), Comprehensive Complications Index (P=0.01), and length of stay (P=0.0001). We conclude that ERP for esophagectomy is associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications and blood transfusions, which results in a significant decrease of length of stay without affecting readmission and mortality rates., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Surgery for benign esophageal diseases may be complex, requiring specialist training, but currently, unlike oncologic surgery, it is not centralized. The aim of the study was to explore the opinion of European surgeons on the centralization of surgery for benign esophageal diseases. A web-based questionnaire, developed through a modified Delphi process, was administered to general and thoracic surgeons of 33 European surgical societies. There were 791 complete responses (98.5%), in 59.2% of respondents, the age ranged between 41 and 60 years, 60.3% of respondents worked in tertiary centers. In 2017, the number of major surgical procedures performed for any esophageal disease by respondents was <10 for 56.5% and >100 for 4.5%; in responder's hospitals procedures number was <10 in 27% and >100 in 15%. Centralization of surgery for benign esophageal diseases was advocated by 83.4%, in centers located according to geographic/population criteria (69.3%), in tertiary hospitals (74.5%), with availability of advanced diagnostic and interventional technologies (88.4%), in at least 10 beds units (70.5%). For national and international centers accreditation/certification, criteria approved included in-hospital mortality and morbidity (95%), quality of life oriented follow-up after surgery (88.9%), quality audits (82.6%), academic research (58.2%), and collaboration with national and international centers (76.6%); indications on surgical procedures volumes were variable. The present study strongly supports the centralization of surgery for benign esophageal diseases, in large part modeled on the principles that have underpinned the centralization of cancer surgery internationally, with emphasis on structure, process, volumes, quality audit, and clinical research., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unparalleled changes to patient care, including the suspension of cancer surgery. Concerns regarding COVID-19-related risks to patients and healthcare workers with the re-introduction of major complex minimally invasive and open surgery have been raised. This study examines the COVID-19 related risks to patients and healthcare workers following the re-introduction of major oesophago-gastric (EG) surgery., Patients and Methods: This was an international, multi-centre, observational study of consecutive patients treated by open and minimally invasive oesophagectomy and gastrectomy for malignant or benign disease. Patients were recruited from nine European centres serving regions with a high population incidence of COVID-19 between 1 May and 1 July 2020. The primary endpoint was 30-day COVID-19-related mortality. All staff involved in the operative care of patients were invited to complete a health-related survey to assess the incidence of COVID-19 in this group., Results: In total, 158 patients were included in the study (71 oesophagectomy, 82 gastrectomy). Overall, 87 patients (57%) underwent MIS (59 oesophagectomy, 28 gastrectomy). A total of 403 staff were eligible for inclusion, of whom 313 (78%) completed the health survey. Approaches to mitigate against the risks of COVID-19 for patients and staff varied amongst centres. No patients developed COVID-19 in the post-operative period. Two healthcare workers developed self-limiting COVID-19., Conclusions: Precautions to minimise the risk of COVID-19 infection have enabled the safe re-introduction of minimally invasive and open EG surgery for both patients and staff. Further studies are necessary to determine the minimum requirements for mitigations against COVID-19., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Many hospitals postponed elective surgical care during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Some centers continued elective surgery, including esophageal cancer surgery, with the use of preoperative screening methods; however, there is no evidence supporting the safety of this strategy as postoperative outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic have not yet been investigated., Methods: This multicenter study in four European tertiary esophageal cancer referral centers included consecutive adult patients undergoing elective esophageal cancer surgery from a prospectively maintained database in a COVID-19 pandemic cohort (1 March 2020-31 May 2020) and a control cohort (1 October 2019-29 February 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation., Results: The COVID-19 cohort consisted of 139 patients, versus 168 patients in the control cohort. There was no difference in the rate of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (13.7% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.127) and number of pulmonary complications (32.4% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.646) between the COVID-19 cohort and the control cohort. Overall, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were comparable between both cohorts. History taking and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were used as preoperative screening methods to detect a possible severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in all centers. No patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 pre- or postoperatively., Conclusion: Esophageal cancer surgery during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with an increase in pulmonary complications as no patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. Esophageal cancer surgery can be performed safely with the use of adequate preoperative SARS-CoV-2 screening methods., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Importance: Ninety-day mortality rates after esophagectomy are an indicator of the quality of surgical oncologic management. Accurate risk prediction based on large data sets may aid patients and surgeons in making informed decisions., Objective: To develop and validate a risk prediction model of death within 90 days after esophagectomy for cancer using the International Esodata Study Group (IESG) database, the largest existing prospective, multicenter cohort reporting standardized postoperative outcomes., Design, Setting, and Participants: In this diagnostic/prognostic study, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients from 39 institutions in 19 countries between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Patients with esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to development and validation cohorts. A scoring system that predicted death within 90 days based on logistic regression β coefficients was conducted. A final prognostic score was determined and categorized into homogeneous risk groups that predicted death within 90 days. Calibration and discrimination tests were assessed between cohorts., Exposures: Esophageal resection for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction., Main Outcomes and Measures: All-cause postoperative 90-day mortality., Results: A total of 8403 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [9.0] years; 6641 [79.0%] male) were included. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.0% (n = 164), and the 90-day mortality rate was 4.2% (n = 353). Development (n = 4172) and validation (n = 4231) cohorts were randomly assigned. The multiple logistic regression model identified 10 weighted point variables factored into the prognostic score: age, sex, body mass index, performance status, myocardial infarction, connective tissue disease, peripheral vascular disease, liver disease, neoadjuvant treatment, and hospital volume. The prognostic scores were categorized into 5 risk groups: very low risk (score, ≥1; 90-day mortality, 1.8%), low risk (score, 0; 90-day mortality, 3.0%), medium risk (score, -1 to -2; 90-day mortality, 5.8%), high risk (score, -3 to -4: 90-day mortality, 8.9%), and very high risk (score, ≤-5; 90-day mortality, 18.2%). The model was supported by nonsignificance in the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64-0.72) in the development cohort and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.69) in the validation cohort., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, on the basis of preoperative variables, the IESG risk prediction model allowed stratification of an individual patient's risk of death within 90 days after esophagectomy. These data suggest that this model can help in the decision-making process when esophageal cancer surgery is being considered and in informed consent.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intranodal lymphangiography (INL) with high-dose ethiodized oil in patients with postoperative refractory chylothorax. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review of a cohort of 18 patients with refractory postoperative chylothorax seen between May 2015 and March 2019 was conducted. All patients underwent intranodal lymphangiography with high doses of ethiodized oil (mean, 75 mL; range, 40-140 mL). The following information was gathered from the institutional database: patient demographics, type of surgery, output volumes, interval between surgery and lymphangiography, imaging results, amount of ethiodized oil injected, clinical success, and time to resolution. RESULTS. Of the 18 patients, 11 (61%) had previously undergone thoracic duct ligation, and seven (39%) had not. A lymphatic leak was confirmed by lymphangiography in 12 of 18 patients (67%). A total of five patients underwent a second session of INL, which was successful in three of the patients (60%). Removal of all chest tubes was possible in 15 of 18 patients (83%) after a mean of 12 days (range, 1-25 days). Two patients had an anastomotic leak develop after esophagectomy and died with their chest tubes in situ. One patient underwent thoracic duct ligation after two failed INL procedures. No complications were recorded. CONCLUSION. INL with a high dose of injected ethiodized oil is a safe and effective procedure for the management of postsurgical refractory chylothorax, with chest tube removal in 83% of patients.

The optimal perioperative fluid management during esophagectomy is still not clear. Liberal regimens have been associated with higher morbidity and respiratory complications. Restrictive regimens might raise concerns for kidney function and increase the need to associate vasopressors. The aim of this study was to investigate retrospectively the perioperative fluid administration during esophagectomy and to correlate this with postoperative respiratory outcome. All patients who underwent esophagectomy between January and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics, type of surgery and postoperative course were reviewed. Fluid administration and vasopressor use were calculated intraoperatively and during the postoperative stay at the recovery unit. Fluid overload was defined as a positive fluid balance of more than 125 mL/m2/h during the first 24 hours. Patients were divided in 3 groups: GRP0 (no fluid overload/no vasopressors); GRP1 (no fluid overload/need for vasopressors); GRP2 (fluid overload with/without vasopressors). Postoperative complications were prospectively recorded according to Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group criteria. A total of 103 patients were analyzed: 35 (34%) GRP0, 50 (49%) GRP1 and 18 (17%) GRP2. No significant differences were found for age, treatment (neoadjuvant vs. primary), type of surgery (open/minimally invasive), histology nor comorbidities. There were significant (P ≤ 0.001) differences in fluid balance/m2/h (75 ± 21 mL; 86 ± 22 mL and 144 ± 20 mL) across GRP0, GRP1 and GRP2, respectively. We found differences in respiratory complications (GRP0 (20%) versus GRP1 (42%; P = 0.034) and GRP0 (20%) versus GRP2 (61%; P = 0.002)) and "Comprehensive Complications Index" (GRP0 (20.5) versus GRP1 (34.6; P = 0.015) and GRP0 (20.5) versus GRP2 (35.1; P = 0.009)). Multivariable analysis (binary logistic regression) for "any respiratory complication" was performed. Patients who received fluid overload (GRP2) had a 10.24 times higher risk to develop postoperative respiratory complications. When patients received vasopressors alone (GRP1), the chances of developing these complications were 3.57 times higher compared to GRP0. Among patients undergoing esophagectomy, there is a wide variety in the administration of fluid during the first 24 hours. There was a higher incidence of respiratory complications when patients received higher amounts of fluid or when vasopressors were used. We believe that a personalized and protocolized fluid administration algorithm should be implemented and that individual risk factors should be identified., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

There are no internationally recognized criteria available to determine preparedness for hospital discharge after esophagectomy. This study aims to achieve international consensus using Delphi methodology. The expert panel consisted of 40 esophageal surgeons spanning 16 countries and 4 continents. During a 3-round, web-based Delphi process, experts voted for discharge criteria using 5-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Consensus was reached if agreement was ≥75% in round 3. Consensus was achieved for the following basic criteria: nutritional requirements are met by oral intake of at least liquids with optional supplementary nutrition via jejunal feeding tube. The patient should have passed flatus and does not require oxygen during mobilization or at rest. Central venous catheters should be removed. Adequate analgesia at rest and during mobilization is achieved using both oral opioid and non-opioid analgesics. All vital signs should be normal unless abnormal preoperatively. Inflammatory parameters should be trending down and close to normal (leucocyte count ≤12G/l and C-reactive protein ≤80 mg/dl). This multinational Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process for consensus criteria to determine 'fit-for-discharge' status after esophagectomy. Results of this Delphi survey may be applied to clinical outcomes research as an objective measure of short-term recovery. Furthermore, standardized endpoints identified through this process may be used in clinical practice to guide decisions regarding patient discharge and may help to reduce the risk of premature discharge or prolonged admission., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: The enrichment of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood provides a minimally invasive method for biomarker discovery in cancer. Longitudinal interrogation allows monitoring or prediction of therapy response, detection of minimal residual disease or progression, and determination of prognosis. Despite inherent phenotypic heterogeneity and differences in cell surface marker expression, most CTC isolation technologies typically use positive selection. This necessitates the optimization of marker-independent CTC methods, enabling the capture of heterogenous CTCs. The aim of this report is to compare a size-dependent and a marker-dependent CTC-isolation method, using spiked esophageal cells in healthy donor blood and blood from patients diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma., Methods: Using esophageal cancer cell lines (OE19 and OE33) spiked into blood of a healthy donor, we investigated tumor cell isolation by Parsortix post cell fixation, immunostaining and transfer to a glass slide, and benchmarked its performance against the CellSearch system. Additionally, we performed DEPArray cell sorting to infer the feasibility to select and isolate cells of interest, aiming towards downstream single-cell molecular characterization in future studies. Finally, we measured CTC prevalence by Parsortix in venous blood samples from patients with various esophageal adenocarcinoma tumor stages., Results: OE19 and OE33 cells were spiked in healthy donor blood and subsequently processed using CellSearch (n = 16) or Parsortix (n = 16). Upon tumor cell enrichment and enumeration, the recovery rate ranged from 76.3 ± 23.2% to 21.3 ± 9.2% for CellSearch and Parsortix, respectively. Parsortix-enriched and stained cell fractions were successfully transferred to the DEPArray instrument with preservation of cell morphology, allowing isolation of cells of interest. Finally, despite low CTC prevalence and abundance, Parsortix detected traditional CTCs (i.e. cytokeratin+/CD45-) in 8/29 (27.6%) of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, of whom 50% had early stage (I-II) disease., Conclusions: We refined an epitope-independent isolation workflow to study CTCs in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. CTC recovery using Parsortix was substantially lower compared to CellSearch when focusing on the traditional CTC phenotype with CD45-negative and cytokeratin-positive staining characteristics. Future research could determine if this method allows downstream molecular interrogation of CTCs to infer new prognostic and predictive biomarkers on a single-cell level., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Purpose: To define instructions for delineation of target volumes in the neoadjuvant setting in oesophageal cancer., Materials and Methods: Radiation oncologists of five European centres participated in the following consensus process: [1] revision of published (MEDLINE) and national/institutional delineation guidelines; [2] first delineation round of five cases (patient 1-5) according to national/institutional guidelines; [3] consensus meeting to discuss the results of step 1 and 2, followed by a target volume delineation proposal; [4] circulation of proposed instructions for target volume delineation and atlas for feedback; [5] second delineation round of five new cases (patient 6-10) to peer review and validate (two additional centres) the agreed delineation guidelines and atlas; [6] final consensus on the delineation guidelines depicted in an atlas. Target volumes of the delineation rounds were compared between centres by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and maximum/mean undirected Hausdorff distances (H max /H mean )., Results: In the first delineation round, the consistency between centres was moderate (CTVtotal: DSC = 0.59-0.88; H mean  = 0.2-0.4 cm). Delineations in the second round were much more consistent. Lowest variability was obtained between centres participating in the consensus meeting (CTVtotal: DSC: p < 0.050 between rounds for patients 6/7/8/10; H mean : p < 0.050 for patients 7/8/10), compared to validation centres (CTVtotal: DSC: p < 0.050 between validation and consensus meeting centres for patients 6/7/8; H mean : p < 0.050 for patients 7/10). A proposal for delineation of target volumes and an atlas were generated., Conclusion: We proposed instructions for target volume delineation and an atlas for the neoadjuvant radiation treatment in oesophageal cancer. These will enable a more uniform delineation of patients in clinical practice and clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with adverse outcomes and troubling symptoms. Widely accepted diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE are missing. This hampers the interpretation and comparison of studies. A modified Delphi process, using repeated web-based questionnaires, combined with live interim group discussions was conducted by 33 experts within the field, from Europe, North America, and Asia. DGCE was divided into early DGCE if present within 14 days of surgery and late if present later than 14 days after surgery. The final criteria for early DGCE, accepted by 25 of 27 (93%) experts, were as follows: >500 mL diurnal nasogastric tube output measured on the morning of postoperative day 5 or later or >100% increased gastric tube width on frontal chest x-ray projection together with the presence of an air-fluid level. The final criteria for late DGCE accepted by 89% of the experts were as follows: the patient should have 'quite a bit' or 'very much' of at least two of the following symptoms; early satiety/fullness, vomiting, nausea, regurgitation or inability to meet caloric need by oral intake and delayed contrast passage on upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast radiogram or on timed barium swallow. A symptom grading tool for late DGCE was constructed grading each symptom as: 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', or 'very much', generating 0, 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively. For the five symptoms retained in the diagnostic criteria for late DGCE, the minimum score would be 0, and the maximum score would be 15. The final symptom grading tool for late DGCE was accepted by 27 of 31 (87%) experts. For the first time, diagnostic criteria for early and late DGCE and a symptom grading tool for late DGCE are available, based on an international expert consensus process., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.)

Background: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare variant of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Materials and Methods . We reviewed SFT patients (pts) treated at our institution between 12/1990 and 09/2017., Results: We identified 94 pts with a median follow-up (mFU) of 4.7 years (range: 0.1-21.53). Primary sites were the chest (33%), abdomen (21.3%), brain (12.8%), and extremities (9.6%); 6.4% of pts presented with synchronous metastasis. Median overall survival (mOS) from the first diagnosis was 56.0 months (m) (0.3-258.3). Doege-Potter syndrome was seen in 2.1% of pts. Primary resection was performed in 86 pts (91.5%). Median progression-free survival was 34.1 m (1.0-157.1), and 43% of pts stayed SFT-free during FU. Local recurrence occurred in 26.7% after a mFU of 35.5 m (1.0-153.8), associated with an OS of 45.1 m (4.7-118.2). Metachronous metastasis occurred in 30.2% after a mFU of 36.0 m (0.1-157.1). OS in metastatic pts was 19.0 m (0.3-149.0). Systemic therapy was given to 26 pts (27.7%) with inoperable/metastatic disease. The most common (57.7%) upfront therapy was doxorubicin, achieving responses in 13.3% of pts with a PFS of 4.8 m (0.4-23.8). In second line, pts were treated with ifosfamide or pazopanib, the latter achieving the highest response rates. Third-line treatment was heterogeneous., Conclusion: SFT is an orphan malignancy with a highly variable clinical course and a considerable risk of local failure and metachronous metastasis. Surgery is the only curative option; palliative systemic therapy is used in inoperable/metastatic cases but achieves low response rates. The highest response rates are seen with pazopanib in second/third line., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper., (Copyright © 2020 P. Schöffski et al.)

Purpose/objectives: To develop normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for postoperative pulmonary and cardiac complications and one-year mortality after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal cancer patients., Methods: 691 patients from two institutions (2002-2017) were included; 134 treated with protons. Multivariable logistic regression analyses on 601 patients studied the predictive value of clinical/treatment-related (gender, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, cardiac comorbidity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, histology, cT/N) and dosimetric variables (absolute/relative lung/heart volumes receiving or spared from xGy, mean doses, planning target volume) for the presence of pulmonary complications, cardiac complications and one-year mortality. Model validation was performed using a nonrandom split-sample of 90 patients. Model performance was assessed by AUC and calibration plots., Results: Respectively 144/601 (24.0%) and 165/601 (27.5%) patients developed a pulmonary or cardiac complication. For pulmonary complications, an NTCP model with optimism-corrected AUC of 0.75 (95%CI = 0.73-0.76) was obtained. The model contained mean lung dose (OR = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.09-1.22, p < 0.001), increasing age (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.06, p = 0.002), BMI (OR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.99-1.08, p = 0.084) and squamous cell carcinoma (OR = 3.22, 95%CI = 1.97-5.24, p < 0.001) as predictors. In validation, AUC of 0.79 was obtained (calibration slope 1.26). For cardiac complications, only age (OR = 1.06, 95%CI = 1.04-1.09, p < 0.001) with optimism-corrected AUC of 0.67 (95%CI = 0.65-0.68) was selected. For one-year mortality, an NTCP model with optimism-corrected AUC of 0.63 (95%CI = 0.58-0.66) was obtained. Lung absolute V 35 (OR = 1.0016, 95%CI = 1.0007-1.0026, p = 0.001), cN (OR = 2.45, 95%CI = 1.18-5.09, p = 0.017), cT4 (OR = 2.51, 95%CI = 1.10-5.74, p = 0.029) and cardiac comorbidity (OR = 2.91, 95%CI = 1.46-5.77, p = 0.002) were selected as predictors. At validation, AUC of 0.57 was obtained (calibration slope 0.75)., Conclusion: We were able to build and validate NTCP models for the presence of a postoperative pulmonary complication and for one-year mortality after trimodality treatment in oesophageal cancer., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Antireflux surgery can be proposed in patients with GORD, especially when proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use leads to incomplete symptom improvement. However, to date, international consensus guidelines on the clinical criteria and additional technical examinations used in patient selection for antireflux surgery are lacking. We aimed at generating key recommendations in the selection of patients for antireflux surgery., Design: We included 35 international experts (gastroenterologists, surgeons and physiologists) in a Delphi process and developed 37 statements that were revised by the Consensus Group, to start the Delphi process. Three voting rounds followed where each statement was presented with the evidence summary. The panel indicated the degree of agreement for the statement. When 80% of the Consensus Group agreed (A+/A) with a statement, this was defined as consensus. All votes were mutually anonymous., Results: Patients with heartburn with a satisfactory response to PPIs, patients with a hiatal hernia (HH), patients with oesophagitis Los Angeles (LA) grade B or higher and patients with Barrett's oesophagus are good candidates for antireflux surgery. An endoscopy prior to antireflux surgery is mandatory and a barium swallow should be performed in patients with suspicion of a HH or short oesophagus. Oesophageal manometry is mandatory to rule out major motility disorders. Finally, oesophageal pH (±impedance) monitoring of PPI is mandatory to select patients for antireflux surgery, if endoscopy is negative for unequivocal reflux oesophagitis., Conclusion: With the ICARUS guidelines, we generated key recommendations for selection of patients for antireflux surgery., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe anastomotic techniques used for total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (ttMIE) and to analyze the associated morbidity., Background: ttMIE faces increasing application in surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. For esophagogastric reconstruction, different anastomotic techniques are currently used, but their effect on postoperative anastomotic leakage and morbidity has not been investigated., Patients and Methods: Patients were selected from a basic dataset, collected during a 5-year period from 13 international surgical high-volume centers. Endpoints were anastomotic leakage rate and postoperative morbidity in correlation to anastomotic techniques, measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)., Results: Five anastomotic techniques were identified in 966 patients after ttMIE: intrathoracic end-to-side circular-stapled technique in 427 patients (double-stapling n = 90, purse-string n = 337), intrathoracic (n = 109) or cervical (n = 255) side-to-side linear-stapled, and cervical end-to-side hand-sewn (n = 175). Leakage rates were similar in intrathoracic and cervical anastomoses (15.9% vs 17.2%, P = 0.601), but overall complications (56.7%% vs 63.7%, P = 0.029) and median 90-day CCI {21 [interquartile range (IQR) 0-36] vs 29 [IQR 0-40], P = 0.019} favored intrathoracic reconstructions. Leakage rates after intrathoracic end-to-side double-stapling (23.3%) and cervical end-to-side hand-sewn (25.1%) techniques were significantly higher compared with intrathoracic side-to-side linear (15.6%), end-to-side purse-string (13.9%), and cervical side-to-side linear-stapled esophagogastrostomies (11.8%) (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed anastomotic technique as independent predictor of leakage after ttMIE., Conclusion: Results of this analysis present the current status of the technical evolution of ttMIE with anastomotic leakage as predominant surgical complication. However, technique-related morbidity requires cautious interpretation considering the long learning curve of this complex surgical procedure.