Search

ASCO Guidelines provide recommendations with comprehensive review and analyses of the relevant literature for each recommendation, following the guideline development process as outlined in the ASCO Guidelines Methodology Manual. ASCO Guidelines follow the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy for Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical Practice Guidelines and other guidance ("Guidance") provided by ASCO is not a comprehensive or definitive guide to treatment options. It is intended for voluntary use by providers and should be used in conjunction with independent professional judgment. Guidance may not be applicable to all patients, interventions, diseases or stages of diseases. Guidance is based on review and analysis of relevant literature, and is not intended as a statement of the standard of care. ASCO does not endorse third-party drugs, devices, services, or therapies and assumes no responsibility for any harm arising from or related to the use of this information. See complete disclaimer in Appendix 1 and 2 (online only) for more .PURPOSETo provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians who treat patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.METHODSA systematic review of the literature published from 2013 to 2023 was conducted to identify relevant systematic reviews, phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies where applicable.RESULTSTwelve RCTs, two systematic reviews, and one nonrandomized study met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.RECOMMENDATIONSFollowing assessment with magnetic resonance imaging, for patients with microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair locally advanced rectal cancer, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT; ie chemoradiation [CRT] and chemotherapy) should be offered as initial treatment for patients with tumors located in the lower rectum and/or patients who are at higher risk for local and/or distant metastases. Patients without higher-risk factors may discuss chemotherapy with selective CRT depending on extent of response, TNT, or neoadjuvant long-course CRT or short-course radiation. For patients who are candidates for TNT, the preferred timing for chemotherapy is after radiation, and neoadjuvant long-course CRT is preferred over short-course radiation therapy (RT), however short-course RT may also be a viable treatment option depending on circumstances. Nonoperative management may be discussed as an alternative to total mesorectal excision for patients who have a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. For patients whose tumors are microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient, immunotherapy is recommended.Additional information is available at http://www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Background: The identification of tumor deposits (TD) currently plays a limited role in staging for colorectal cancer (CRC) aside from N1c lymph node designation. The objective of this study was to determine the prognostic impact, beyond American Joint Committee on Cancer N1c designation, of TDs among patients with primary CRC., Methods: Patients who had resected stage I-III primary CRC diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) stratified by TD status and lymph node (N) status was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses., Results: In total, 147,783 patients with primary CRC were identified. TDs were present in 15,444 patients (10.5%). The presence of TDs was significantly associated with adverse tumor characteristics, including advanced pathologic stage, nodal status, and metastasis status. The presence of TDs was associated with worse CSS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.02-3.22), as it was for each given N category (e.g., N2a and TD-negative [HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 2.37-2.64] vs. N2a and TD-positive [HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 3.49-4.03]). The presence of multiple TDs was also associated with decreased CSS for each given N category compared with a single TD (e.g. N2a with one TD [HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.65-3.61] vs. N2a with two or more TDs [HR, 4.32; 95% CI, 3.87-4.82])., Conclusions: TDs were identified as an independent predictor of a worse outcome in patients with CRC. The presence of TDs confers distinctly different CSS and provides important prognostic information among patients with CRC and warrants further investigation as a unique variable in future iterations of CRC staging., (© 2024 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: BRAFV600E-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits a strong correlation with DNA hypermethylation suggesting this subgroup of tumors presents unique epigenomic phenotypes. Nonetheless, 5-azacitidine, which inhibits DNA methyltransferase activity, is not efficacious in BRAFV600E CRC in vivo., Experimental Design: We randomized and treated mice implanted with patient-derived tumor xenografts harboring BRAFV600E mutation with control, 5-azacitidine, vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor), or the combination. Comprehensive epigenomic profiling was conducted on control and 5-azacitidine-treated tumor samples, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin accessibility, and gene expression. Combinations of epigenetic agents were explored in preclinical BRAFV600E CRC models., Results: A profound reduction of DNA methylation levels upon 5-azacitidine treatment was confirmed, however, transcriptional repression was not relieved. This study unbiasedly explored the adaptive engagement of other epigenomic modifications upon 5-azacitidine treatment. A loss of histone acetylation and a gain of histone methylations, including H3K27 and H3K4 trimethylation, were observed around these hypomethylated regions suggesting the involvement of polycomb repressive complex (PRC) activity around the genome with loss of DNA methylation, therefore maintaining the repression of key tumor suppressor genes. Combined inhibition of PRC activity through EZH2 inhibitor with 5-azacitidine treatment additively improved efficacies in BRAFV600E CRC cells., Conclusions: In conclusion, DNA hypomethylation by 5-azacitidine exhibits a close association with H3K27me3 and PRC activity in BRAFV600E CRC, and simultaneous blockade of DNMT and EZH2 holds promise as a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with BRAFV600E-mutated CRC.

Providing safe and informed healthcare for sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals with cancer is stymied by the lack of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data reliably available in health records and by insufficient training for staff. Approaches that support institutional learning, especially around sensitive topics, are essential for hospitals seeking to improve practices impacting patient safety and research. We engineered annual institutional retreats to identify and unify stakeholders, promote awareness of gaps and needs, identify initiatives, minimize redundant projects, and coordinate efforts that promote improvements in SGM cancer care, education, and research. The 2022 and 2023 retreats employed a 4-h hybrid format allowing virtual and in-person engagement. Retreat organizers facilitated small-group discussions for brainstorming among participants. We performed descriptive statistics from retreat evaluations. The retreats engaged 104 attendees from distinct departments and roles. Participants expressed robust satisfaction, commending the retreat organization and content quality. Notably, the first retreat yielded leadership endorsement and funding for a Quality Improvement pilot to standardize SOGI data collection and clinical staff training. The second retreat provided a platform for updates on focused efforts across the institution and for receiving direction regarding national best practices for SGM care and research. We report the processes and outcomes of institution-wide retreats, which served as a platform for identifying gaps in organizational healthcare practices and research for SGM individuals with cancer. The strategies described herein may be readily scaled at other cancer hospitals seeking to learn and enact system-wide practice changes that support the needs of SGM patients and families., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Rationale of the Trial: Although the use of engineered T cells in cancer immunotherapy has greatly advanced the treatment of hematological malignancies, reaching meaningful clinical responses in the treatment of solid tumors is still challenging. We investigated the safety and tolerability of IMA202 in a first-in-human, dose escalation basket trial in human leucocyte antigen A*02:01 positive patients with melanoma-associated antigen A1 (MAGEA1)-positive advanced solid tumors., Trial Design: The 2+2 trial design was an algorithmic design based on a maximally acceptable dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 25% and the sample size was driven by the algorithmic design with a maximum of 16 patients. IMA202 consists of autologous genetically modified cytotoxic CD8 + T cells expressing a T cell receptor (TCR), which is specific for a nine amino acid peptide derived from MAGEA1. Eligible patients underwent leukapheresis, T cells were isolated, transduced with lentiviral vector carrying MAGEA1-specific TCR and following lymphodepletion (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide), infused with a median of 1.4×10 9 specific T cells (range, 0.086×10 9 -2.57×10 9 ) followed by interleukin 2. SAFETY OF IMA202: No DLT was observed. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were cytopenias, that is, neutropenia (81.3%), lymphopenia (75.0%), anemia (50.0%), thrombocytopenia (50.0%) and leukopenia (25.0%). 13 patients experienced cytokine release syndrome, including one grade 3 event. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was observed in two patients and was grade 1 in both. EFFICACY OF IMA202: Of the 16 patients dosed, 11 (68.8%) patients had stable disease (SD) as their best overall response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1). Five patients had initial tumor shrinkage in target lesions and one patient with SD experienced continued shrinkage in target lesions for 3 months in total but had to be classified as progressive disease due to progressive non-target lesions. IMA202 T cells were persistent in peripheral blood for several weeks to months and were also detectable in tumor tissue. Peak persistence was higher in patients who received higher doses., Conclusion: In conclusion, IMA202 had a manageable safety profile, and it was associated with biological and potential clinical activity of MAGEA1-targeting genetically engineered TCR-T cells in a poor prognosis, multi-indication solid tumor cohort., Trial Registration Numbers: NCT04639245, NCT05430555., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MBH, AM, AS, MK, KP, ASM, DK, and SW were employees of Immatics US in the course of this work and may have securities from Immatics. SG-G, KA, SS, JH, MAK, AA, LB, MB, SB, CW, OS, AM-M, NH, and CMB were employees of Immatics Biotechnologies in the course of this work and may have securities from Immatics. AMT: Clinical trial research funding (received through the institution): OBI Pharma USA, Immatics, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Agenus, Tempus, Tvardi, Boston Biomedical, Karus Therapeutics; Consulting or advisory role: Vincerx, Diaccurate, BrYet, Nex-I, Macrogenics, BioEclipse. BSA: Two patents sold to GreenJay Therapeutics, privately held. IIW’s ASCO COI form is up to date. JJL: Data and safety monitoring board: Abbvie, Agenus, Amgen, Immutep, Evaxion; Scientific advisory board: (no stock) 7 Hills, Affivant, BioCytics, Bright Peak, Exo, Fstar, Inzen, RefleXion, Xilio (stock) Actym, Alphamab Oncology, Arch Oncology, Duke Street Bio, Kanaph, Mavu, NeoTx, Onc. AI, OncoNano, physIQ, Pyxis, Saros, STipe, Tempest; Consultancy with compensation: Abbvie, Agenus, Alnylam, Atomwise, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Castle, Checkmate, Codiak, Crown, Cugene, Curadev, Day One, Eisai, EMD Serono, Endeavor, Flame, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead, Glenmark, HotSpot, Kadmon, KSQ, Janssen, Ikena, Inzen, Immatics, Immunocore, Incyte, Instil, IO Biotech, Macrogenics, Merck, Mersana, Nektar, Novartis, Partner, Pfizer, Pioneering Medicines, PsiOxus, Regeneron, Replimmune, Ribon, Roivant, Servier, STINGthera, Synlogic, Synthekine; Research support: (all to institutions for clinical trials unless noted) AbbVie, Astellas, Astrazeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corvus, Day One, EMD Serono, Fstar, Genmab, Ikena, Immatics, Incyte, Kadmon, KAHR, Macrogenics, Merck, Moderna, Nektar, Next Cure, Numab, Palleon, Pfizer, Replimmune, Rubius, Servier, Scholar Rock, Synlogic, Takeda, Trishula, Tizona, Xencor; Patents: (both provisional) Serial #15/612,657 (Cancer Immunotherapy), PCT/US18/36052 (Microbiome Biomarkers for Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Responsiveness: Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Uses Thereof). MW: Honoraria: Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, GWT, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Novartis, SYNLAB; Consulting or advisory role: Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImCheck therapeutics, Immatics, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Novartis; Research funding: Roche; Travel, accommodations, expenses: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GEMoaB, Immatics, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Sanofi/Aventis; TAWH: Honoraria: Amgen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz; Consulting or advisory role: Amgen, Jazz, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline; Travel, accommodation, expenses: Janssen, Jazz, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Amgen, Kite/Gilead, Astellas, Neovii, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi. VKM: Consulting or advisory role: Axiom Healthcare Strategies, Bicara Therapeutics, BioMedical Insights, Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte; Research funding: Bicara Therapeutics, BioNTech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Immatics, Pfizer. WHA: Consulting or advisory role: Janssen; Research funding (received through institution): Affimed, BioNTech; Travel, accommodation, expenses: Immatics, Janssen, BioNTech; Honoraria: GSK, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Astellas. All other authors have no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for colorectal cancer may provide respite from systemic therapy and prolonged disease-free intervals. We sought to identify factors associated with PM and to characterize the differential impact on overall survival for those offered lung resection., Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for stage IV colorectal cancer patients with lung-limited metastatic disease between 2010 and 2016. Among patients who underwent primary tumor resection, those who underwent PM were compared with those who did not. Penalized regression with the least absolute selection and shrinkage operator was used to determine factors associated with receiving metastasectomy as well as overall survival., Results: In total, 867 (15.1%) patients underwent resection of both primary tumor and pulmonary metastases whereas 4864 (84.8%) had primary tumor resection alone. In unadjusted analyses, metastasectomy patents were younger, more often privately insured, more educated, and traveled farther to receive care (all P < .001). In multivariable analyses, younger age, traveling >25 miles, and care at high-volume hospitals were associated with PM (P < .01). In addition, primary site surgery without PM was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.35; confidence interval, 1.23-1.49), even after adjusting for patient, tumor, and hospital-related factors., Conclusions: Patients who were older, who received care closer to home, and who were treated at low-volume hospitals were less likely to receive metastasectomy for lung-limited colorectal cancer after definitive resection of their primary tumor. Failure to receive PM resulted in worse overall survival, emphasizing the strong need for efforts to provide uniform, equitable care to all patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with both BRAF V600E mutations and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have poor prognosis. Currently, there are no specifically targeted first-line treatment options indicated for patients with mCRC whose tumors harbor both molecular aberrations. Pembrolizumab is a checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of MSI-H/dMMR mCRC, and the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib, in combination with cetuximab, is approved for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Combination of pembrolizumab with encorafenib and cetuximab may synergistically enhance antitumor activity in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant, MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. SEAMARK is a randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab with encorafenib and cetuximab versus pembrolizumab alone in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E-mutant, MSI-H/dMMR mCRC.

Background: The standard treatment for recurrent or persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma is surgical salvage, but disease control and survival are suboptimal., Patients/methods: Patients treated for recurrent or persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma at our institution from 2002 to 2022 were included. Patients were classified by type of salvage treatment received: surgery alone vs. reirradiation followed by surgery and by whether they received intraoperative radiation at the time of surgery. Clinical and pathologic variables were collected and assessed for association with risk of second local recurrence and death from any cause., Results: Sixty four patients were included; 55(85.9%) were treated with surgery alone and 9 (14.1%) were treated with reirradiation followed by surgery. Median (IQR) follow up from the time of salvage treatment was 40.0 (20.3-68.0) months. The 3-year cumulative incidence of second local recurrence (95% CI) after salvage surgery was 36% (24%-48%); 39% (26%-52%) for patients treated with surgery alone and 15% (0.46%-51%) for patients treated with reirradiation followed by surgery. Factors associated with increased second local recurrence after salvage surgery included a locoregional recurrence, lymphovascular space invasion and positive surgical margins. The 3-year overall survival (95% CI) after salvage surgery was 70% (59%-83%); 68% (7%-56%) after surgery alone and 89% (10.5%-70.6%) after reirradiation followed by surgery. Factors associated with worse overall survival included male sex, a larger recurrent tumor and positive surgical margins., Conclusions: Approximately 60% of patients achieved pelvic control after salvage therapy for recurrent or persistent anal squamous cell carcinoma. Although receipt of reirradiation and intraoperative radiation were not associated with improved second local recurrence or overall survival in our cohort, patients with positive surgical margins and lymphovascular space invasion on surgical pathology had higher rates of pelvic recurrence after salvage surgery and may benefit from escalated salvage therapy., Competing Interests: Disclosure None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: At our institution, we treat patients with a daily vaginal dilator (VD) during chemoradiation (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). We evaluated compliance with daily VD use, radiation dose to the vaginal wall (VW), and anterior vaginal wall (AVW), and patient-reported long-term sexual function., Methods and Materials: We included women with SCCA who received definitive, intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based CRT. Women who were alive without evidence of disease received a patient-reported outcome survey, which included the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). We identified factors associated with FSFI, such as radiation dose to the VW and AVW using linear regression models and used Youden index analysis to estimate a dose cutoff to predict sexual dysfunction., Results: Three hundred thirty-nine consecutively treated women were included in the analysis; 285 (84.1%) were treated with a daily VD. Of 184 women alive without disease, 90 patients (49%) completed the FSFI, and 51 (56.7%) were sexually active with valid FSFI scores. All received therapy with a daily VD. Forty-one women (80%) had sexual dysfunction. Univariate analysis showed higher dose to 50% (D50%) of the AVW correlated with worse FSFI (β -.262; P = .043), worse desire FSFI subscore (β -.056; P = .003), and worse pain FSFI subscore (β -.084; P = .009). Younger age correlated with worse pain FSFI subscale (β .067; P = .026). Age (β .070; P = .013) and AVW D50% (β -.087; P = .009) were significant on multivariable analysis. AVW D50% >48 Gy predicted increased risk of sexual dysfunction., Conclusions: Daily VD use is safe and well tolerated during CRT for SCCA. Using a VD during treatment to displace the AVW may reduce the risk for sexual dysfunction. Limiting the AVW D50% <48 Gy may further reduce the risk but additional data are needed to validate this constraint., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Appropriately selected patients clearly benefit from resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastases (PMs). However, there remains equipoise surrounding optimal chest surveillance strategies following pulmonary metastasectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors that may inform chest surveillance in this population., Methods: Patients who underwent CRC pulmonary metastasectomy were identified from a single institution's prospectively maintained surgical database. Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics were collected. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of subsequent PM within 6 months of the index lung resection. Multivariate modeling was used to evaluate risk factors., Results: A total of 197 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, of whom 52.3% (n = 103) developed subsequent PM, at a median of 9.51 months following the index metastasectomy. Patients with KRAS alterations (odds ratio [OR], 3.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.363-6.926; P = .007), TP53 alterations (OR, 3.109; 95% CI, 1.318-7.341; P = .010) were found to be at risk of PM diagnosis within 6 months of the index metastasectomy, while those with an APC alteration (OR, .218; 95% CI, 0.080-0.598; P = .003) were protected. Moreover, patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months of the initial PM diagnosis also were more likely to develop early lung recurrence (OR, 2.105; 95% CI, 0.971-4.563; P = .059)., Conclusions: Patients with KRAS alterations, TP53 alterations, and no APC alterations developed early recurrence in the lung following pulmonary metastasectomy, as did those who received chemotherapy after their initial PM diagnosis. As such, these groups benefit from early lung imaging after metastasectomy, as chest surveillance protocols should be based on patient-centered clinicopathologic and genomic risk factors., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Objectives: For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the lung is the most common extra-abdominal site of distant metastasis. However, practices for chest imaging after colorectal resection vary widely. We aimed to identify characteristics that may indicate a need for early follow-up imaging., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent CRC resection, collecting clinicopathologic details and oncologic outcomes. Patients were grouped by timing of pulmonary metastases (PM) development. Analyses were performed to investigate odds ratio (OR) of PM diagnosis within 3 months of CRC resection., Results: Of 1600 patients with resected CRC, 233 (14.6%) developed PM, at a median of 15.4 months following CRC resection. Univariable analyses revealed age, receipt of systemic therapy, lymph node ratio (LNR), lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and KRAS mutation as risk factors for PM. Furthermore, multivariable regression showed neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 2.99, p < 0.001), adjuvant therapy (OR: 6.28, p < 0.001), LNR (OR: 28.91, p < 0.001), and KRAS alteration (OR: 5.19, p < 0.001) to predict PM within 3 months post-resection., Conclusions: We identified clinicopathologic characteristics that predict development of PM within 3 months after primary CRC resection. Early surveillance in such patients should be emphasized to ensure timely identification and treatment of PM., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: Burnout is a psychological occupational syndrome defined by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) as emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a low sense of personal accomplishment. We sought to characterize the prevalence of burnout among early-career medical oncologists at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC)., Methods: For this institutional review board-approved study, an electronic survey was developed for Assistant Professors in the MDACC Division of Cancer Medicine. All participants were involved directly in patient care. Our survey included questions assessing self-reported burnout, nine questions validated in the abbreviated MBI, and 31 questions to assess potential contributors to burnout. Each question was scaled 1-5, with higher scores associated with higher burnout. Descriptive statistics were used to estimate the prevalence of burnout, and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify contributing factors., Results: Among 86 Assistant Professors, 56 (65%) responded to the survey. The mean duration on faculty was 3.1 years. The mean clinical effort was 67% (range, 19-95). Fifty-four percent of respondents self-reported symptoms of burnout including 21% indicating severe burnout. Using the MBI, sentiments of being emotionally drained (54%), fatigued facing another day on the job (45%), and becoming more callous (30%) were especially notable. Twenty-five percent of respondents exhibited severe emotional exhaustion, which was more prevalent ( P < .0001) than depersonalization (6%) or lack of personal accomplishment (17%)., Conclusion: Burnout exists with high prevalence among early-career medical oncologists, with emotional exhaustion being the most common manifestation of burnout. Interventions focusing on reducing emotional exhaustion are needed to reduce burnout among early-career medical oncologists.

Background: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (IO) is emerging as a therapeutic option for patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) given high pathological response rates. The aim of the study was to characterise imaging and endoscopic response to IO., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with localised dMMR CRC that received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy was conducted. Endoscopy, imaging, and pathological outcomes were reviewed to determine response to treatment according to standardised criteria., Results: Thirty-eight patients had received IO for the treatment of localised CRC (median eight cycles). Among evaluable cases (n = 31 for endoscopy and n = 34 for imaging), the best endoscopic response was complete response (CR) in 45% of cases, and the best radiographic response was CR in 23% of cases. Imaging CR rate after ≤4 cycles of IO (n = 1) was 6% compared to 44% after >4 IO cycles (n = 7). Among 28 patients with imaging and endoscopy available, a discrepancy in best response was noted in 15 (54%) cases. At a median follow-up of 28.2 months from IO start, 18 patients underwent surgical resection of which 11 (61%) had pathological CR (pCR). Despite pCR or no evidence of progression ≥6 months after completion of IO among non-operatively managed patients, 72% and 42% of patients had non-CR on imaging and endoscopy, respectively., Conclusions: Discrepancies between imaging and endoscopy are prevalent, and irregularities identified on these modalities can be identified despite pathological remission. Improved clinical response criteria are warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Tsuyoshi Konishi: travel, accommodations, expenses – advent health; Michener Institute of Education at UHN. Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav: Honoraria - Bayer; Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca; Eisai; Merck; Seagen. Consulting or advisory role – Bayer; Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca; Eisai; Merck; Seagen. Research funding – Abbvie (Inst); Abbvie (Inst); Bayer (Inst); Daiichi Sankyo/Astra Zeneca (Inst); Eisai (Inst); Guardant Health (Inst); HiberCell (Inst); Innovent Biologics (Inst); Janssen (Inst); Merck Serono (Inst); Roche/Genentech (Inst); UCB (Inst); Xencor (Inst). Phillip S. Ge: consulting or advisory role – Alira Health; Boston Scientific; Neptune Medical; Ovesco Endoscopy. Benny Johnson: consulting or advisory role – Gritstone Bio; Incyte; Insmed; Pfizer; Taiho Oncology. Research funding – Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); Gateway Foundation (Inst); Syntrix Biosystems (Inst). Van K. Morris: consulting or advisory role – Axiom Healthcare Strategies; Bicara Therapeutics; BioMedical Insights; Boehringer Ingelheim; Incyte. Research funding – Bicara Therapeutics (Inst); BioNTech (Inst); Bristol-Myers Squibb (Inst); EMD Serono (Inst); Immatics; Pfizer (Inst). Scott Kopetz: stock and other ownership interests – Frontier Medicines; Iylon; Lutris; Navire; Xilis. Consulting or advisory role – Abbvie; Accademia Nazionale Di Medicina; Amal Therapeutics; Amgen; Astra Zeneca/MedImmune; Bayer Health; Bicara Therapeutics; Black Diamond Therapeutics; Boehringer Ingelheim; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Medarex; Cardiff Oncology; Carina Biotech; CureTeq; EMD Serono; Endeavor BioMedicines; Flame Biosciences; Foundation Medicine; Frontier Medicines; Genentech; Genomic Health; Gilead Sciences; GlaxoSmithKline; HalioDx; Harbinger Oncology, Inc; Holy Stone Healthcare; Inivata; Ipsen; Iylon; Jacobio; Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Johnson & Johnson/Janssen; Lilly; Lutris; Merck; Mirati Therapeutics; NeoGenomics Laboratories; Novartis; Numab; Ono Pharmaceutical; Pfizer; Redx Pharma; Repare Therapeutics; Replimune; Servier; Taiho Pharmaceutical; Takeda; Tempus; Xilis; Zentalis. Research funding – Amgen; Array BioPharma; Biocartis; Daiichi Sankyo; EMD Serono; Genentech/Roche; Guardant Health; Lilly; MedImmune; Novartis; Sanofi. George J. Chang: consulting or advisory role – Medicaroid. Kaysia Ludford: research funding – Merck (Inst). Michael J. Overman: consulting or advisory role – 3D Medicines; Array BioPharma; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eisai; Gritstone Bio; Janssen; Janssen; MedImmune; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Pfizer; Promega; Roche/Genentech; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. Research funding – Bristol-Myers Squibb; MedImmune; Merck; Roche. The remining authors do not have any disclosures., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: In metastatic colorectal cancer, the detection of RAS mutations by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a valid and noninvasive alternative approach to determining RAS status. However, some RAS mutations may be missed, that is, false negatives can occur, possibly compromising important treatment decisions. We propose a statistical model to assess the probability of false negatives when performing ctDNA testing for RAS., Methods: Cohorts of 172 subjects with tissue and multipanel ctDNA testing from MD Anderson Cancer Center and 146 subjects from Massachusetts General Hospital were collected. We developed a Bayesian model that uses observed frequencies of reference mutations (the maximum of APC and TP53 ) to provide information about the probability of KRAS false negatives. The model was alternatively trained on one cohort and tested on the other. All data were collected on Guardant assays., Results: The model suggests that negative KRAS findings are believable when the maximum of APC and TP53 frequencies is at least 8% (corresponding posterior probability of false negative <5%). Validation studies demonstrated the ability of our tool to discriminate between false-negative and true-negative subjects. Simulations further confirmed the utility of the proposed approach., Conclusion: We suggest clinicians use the tool to more precisely quantify KRAS false-negative ctDNA results when at least one of the reference mutations ( APC , TP53 ) is observed; usage may be especially important for subjects with a maximum reference frequency of <8%. Extension of the methodology to predict false negatives of other genes is possible. Additional reference genes can also be considered. Use of personal training data sets is supported. An open-source R Shiny application is available for public use.

Purpose: Aberrant alterations of ERBB receptor tyrosine kinases lead to tumorigenesis. Single agent therapy targeting EGFR or HER2 has shown clinical successes, but drug resistance often develops due to aberrant or compensatory mechanisms. Herein, we sought to determine the feasibility and safety of neratinib and trametinib in patients with EGFR mutation/amplification, HER2 mutation/amplification, HER3/4 mutation and KRAS mutation., Methods: Patients with actionable somatic mutations or amplifications in ERBB genes or actionable KRAS mutations were enrolled to receive neratinib and trametinib in this phase I dose escalation trial. The primary endpoint was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic analysis and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled with a median age of 50.5 years and a median of 3 lines of prior therapy. Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included: diarrhea (25%), vomiting (10%), nausea (5%), fatigue (5%) and malaise (5%). The MTD was dose level (DL) minus 1 (neratinib 160 mg daily with trametinib 1 mg, 5 days on and 2 days off) given 2 DLTs of grade 3 diarrhea in DL1 (neratinib 160 mg daily with trametinib 1 mg daily). The treatment-related toxicities of DL1 included: diarrhea (100%), nausea (55.6%) and rash (55.6%). Pharmacokinetic data showed trametinib clearance was significantly reduced leading to high drug exposures of trametinib. Two patients achieved stable disease (SD) ≥ 4 months., Conclusion: Neratinib and trametinib combination was toxic and had limited clinical efficacy. This may be due to suboptimal drug dosing given drug-drug interactions., Trial Registration Id: NCT03065387., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is rare. Most cases are diagnosed in a localized setting. Metastatic SCCA is rare, and investigation has been limited in the past for these patients. We believe that hepatic-only metastatic disease could have a unique treatment landscape compared to diseases with diffuse metastatic involvement. Here, we describe cases at our institution., Methods: We reviewed eight SCCA cases with hepatic-only metastatic disease (diagnosed February 2018-January 2022). The objectives were to determine the overall survival and disease-free survival with this approach., Results: The median age was 62 years old (yo). Patients had an ECOG of 0-1. All patients received definitive chemoradiation to their primary anal tumor. A median of three months of neoadjuvant systemic therapy was provided. All patients had a response on their first scan after systemic therapy. Sixty-two percent received carboplatin + paclitaxel. A complete pathologic response was seen in 62% of patients. At their last follow-up, all patients were alive. Three patients had recurrent disease. The estimated 1-year disease-free survival probability was 56.2%., Conclusion: Our report shows the feasibility of a curative-intent approach for patients with hepatic-only metastatic SCCA following the neoadjuvant application of carboplatin + paclitaxel. This approach appears promising in these select patients and warrants further investigation.

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16/18 drive oncogenesis for most patients with cervical, anal, and penile cancers. MEDI0457, a therapeutic DNA vaccine containing plasmids for E6 and E7 HPV-16/18 viral oncogenes and IL-12 adjuvant, is safe and provokes an immune response against E6/E7. We tested MEDI0457 with the anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab for patients with HPV-associated cancers., Methods: Patients with recurrent/metastatic, treatment-refractory HPV-16/18 cervical cancer, or rare HPV-associated (anal and penile) cancers were eligible. Prior immune checkpoint inhibition was not permitted. Patients received MEDI0457 7 mg intramuscularly (weeks 1, 3, 7, 12, and every 8 weeks thereafter) and durvalumab 1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response (RECIST 1.1). In this Simon two-stage phase 2 trial (Ho: p < 0.15; Ha: p ≥ 0.35), ≥2 responses were needed in both cervical and non-cervical cohorts during the first stage for the trial to proceed to stage 2 with an additional 25 patients (34 total) enrolled., Results: Twenty-one patients (12 cervical, 7 anal, and 2 penile) were evaluable for toxicity and 19 for response Overall response rate was 21% (95% CI, 6%-46%) among evaluable patients. Disease control rate was 37% (95% CI, 16%-62%). Median duration of response among responders was 21.8 months (95% CI, 9.7%-not estimable). Median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8%-7.2%). Median overall survival was 17.7 months (95% CI, 7.6%-not estimable). Grades 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 6 (23%) participants., Conclusions: The combination of MEDI0457 and durvalumab demonstrated acceptable safety and tolerability in patients with advanced HPV-16/18 cancers. The low ORR among patients with cervical cancer led to study discontinuation despite a clinically meaningful disease control rate., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus and anal canal is a rare malignancy with an increasing incidence in the United States. In the past 2 decades, the proportion of Americans diagnosed with incurable, metastatic anal cancer at the time of initial presentation has increased. Most cases are linked to prior infection with HPV. Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy has been the accepted standard treatment for patients with localized anal cancer over the past half century, therapeutic advances have increased options for patients with unresectable or incurable anal cancer over the past 5 years. Specifically, combination chemotherapy and immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies has demonstrated efficacy in this setting. Greater understanding of molecular drivers of this viral-associated malignancy has provided critical insight into evolving biomarkers for the clinical management of anal cancer. The pervasiveness of HPV across cases of anal cancer has been leveraged for the development of HPV-specific circulating tumor DNA assays as a sensitive biomarker for prognosticating recurrence in patients with localized anal cancer who complete chemoradiation. For patients with metastatic disease, somatic mutations, well-characterized for anal cancer, have not shown utility in identifying patients who benefit from systemic treatments. Although the overall response rate to immune checkpoint blockade therapies is low for metastatic anal cancer, high immune activation within the tumor and PD-L1 expression may identify patients more likely to experience response. These biomarkers should be incorporated into the design of future clinical trials to personalize further treatment approaches in the evolving management of anal cancer.

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, gastric, duodenal and distal small bowel, biliary tract, pancreatic, colon, rectal, and anal cancer, comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies that impose a significant global burden. Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment landscape for several GI cancers, offering some patients durable responses and prolonged survival. Specifically, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) directed against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), either as monotherapies or in combination regimens, have gained tissue site-specific regulatory approvals for the treatment of metastatic disease and in the resectable setting. Indications for ICIs in GI cancer, however, have differing biomarker and histology requirements depending on the anatomic site of origin. Furthermore, ICIs are associated with unique toxicity profiles compared with other systemic treatments that have long been the mainstay for GI cancer, such as chemotherapy. With the goal of improving patient care by providing guidance to the oncology community, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop this clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of GI cancer. Drawing from published data and clinical experience, the expert panel developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for healthcare professionals using ICIs to treat GI cancers, with topics including biomarker testing, therapy selection, and patient education and quality of life considerations, among others., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KB—researcher: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck. JC—consulting fees: Lilly, Merck, AstraZeneca, Foundation Medicine, Daiichi Sankyo, Macrogenics, Amgen, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas, Turning Point Therapeutics, Silverback Therapeutics, Novartis, Coherus Biosciences, Geneos, Roche; fees for non-CE services: Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb; contracted research: Merck, Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics. KKC—consulting fees: Array, Natera, Merck, Pfizer, Lilly/Loxo; contracted research: BMS, Array, Incyte, Daiichi Sankyo, Nucana, AbbVie, Merck, Pfizer/Calithera (all funds to institution). CE—consulting fees: Boston Scientific, SK, Halio Dx, J&J, Merck, Natera; contracted research: Hutchinson, Merck, Elevar, Janssen. MF—consulting fees: Amgen, Array, Bayer, fSK, HalioDx, Mirati, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Taiho, Zhuhai Yufan Biotech; fees for non-CE services: Guardant360, Amgen; other: Amgen, AstraZenenca, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb (grants to institution). LG—consulting fees: Agios, Debiopharm, Taiho, Alentis, Incyte, Klus, Pieris, QED, SIRTEX, AstraZeneca, H3Biomedicine. JH—consulting fees: Merck, Bayer, BeiGene; contracted research: Merck, Boston Biomedical, Treos Bio, Senhwa Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Incyte, TriOncology, Seattle Genetics, Hutchison MediPharma, Pionyr Immunotherapeutics, Trovogene, G1 Therapeutics. RI—consulting fees: Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Teresa, Hexal AG, Incyte; contracted research: Ipsen, Tersera, Merck, Aveo. RJK—researcher: Bristol-Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly with institutional grants for investigator-initiated trials awarded to Johns Hopkins and Baylor University Medical Center; consultant advisor speaker: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Merck, AstraZeneca, Daicchi Sankyo, Astellas, Eisai, Ipsen, Pieris, Novartis, Takeda, EMD Serono, Novocure, Grail, Toray, Eli Lilly. SK—contracted research: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Aravive, Pfizer. GK—consulting fees: Apexigen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Merck, Pieris, Zymeworks; contracted research: Arog, AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, Oncolys, Pieris, Zymeworks. DTL—consulting fees: Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Nouscom; contracted research: Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Aduro Biotech, Medivir, Curegenix, Nouscom; other: Merck. VKM II—consulting fees: Bicara, Servier; contracted research: Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, BioNTech, Novartis. ASP—consulting fees: Helsinn, BMS, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Hutchinson, Ipsen, Incyte, Exelixis, Pfizer, QED, Lilly, Mirati, Amgen. MAS—consulting fees: Lilly Pharmaceutical; contracted research: Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Oncolys Biopharma. SITC staff—CG, AK, NL, SM-W—nothing to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Multimodality treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) can include long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) or short course radiotherapy (SCRT). Nonoperative management is increasingly pursued for those achieving a complete clinical response. Data regarding long-term function and quality-of-life (QOL) are limited., Methods: Patients with LARC treated with radiotherapy from 2016 to 2020 completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G7), the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS) and the Fecal Incontinence QOL Scale (FIQOL). Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses identified associations between clinical variables including radiation fractionation and the use of surgery versus non-operative management., Results: Of 204 patients surveyed, 124 (60.8%) responded. Median (interquartile range) time from radiation to survey completion was 30.1 (18.3-43) months. Seventy-nine (63.7%) respondents received LCRT, and 45 (36.3%) received SCRT; 101 (81.5%) respondents underwent surgery, and 23 (18.5%) pursued nonoperative management. There were no differences in LARS, FIQoL or FACT-G7 between patients receiving LCRT versus SCRT. On multivariable analysis, only nonoperative management was associated with lower LARS score signifying less bowel dysfunction. Nonoperative management and female sex were associated with a higher FIQoL score signifying less disruption and distress from fecal incontinence issues. Finally, lower BMI at the time of radiation, female sex, and higher FIQoL score were associated with higher FACT-G7 scores signifying better overall QOL., Conclusions: These results suggest long-term patient-reported bowel function and QOL may be similar for individuals receiving SCRT and LCRT for the treatment of LARC, but nonoperative management may lead to improved bowel function and QOL., Competing Interests: Disclosure All other authors state that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the association of perioperative ctDNA dynamics on outcomes after hepatectomy for CLM., Summary Background Data: Prognostication is imprecise for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, and ctDNA is a promising biomarker. However, clinical implications of perioperative ctDNA dynamics are not well established., Methods: Patients underwent curative-intent hepatectomy after preoperative chemotherapy for CLM (2013-2017) with paired prehepatectomy/postoperative ctDNA analyses via plasma-only assay. Positivity was determined using a proprietary variant classifier. Primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Median follow-up was 55 months., Results: Forty-eight patients were included. ctDNA was detected before and after surgery (ctDNA+/+) in 14 (29%), before but not after surgery (ctDNA+/-) in 19 (40%), and not at all (ctDNA-/-) in 11 (23%). Adverse tissue somatic mutations were detected in TP53 (n = 26; 54%), RAS (n = 23; 48%), SMAD4 (n = 5; 10%), FBXW7 (n = 3; 6%), and BRAF (n = 2; 4%). ctDNA+/+ was associated with worse RFS (median: ctDNA+/+, 6.0 months; ctDNA+/-, not reached; ctDNA-/-, 33.0 months; P = 0.001). Compared to ctDNA+/+, ctDNA+/- was associated with improved RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.58)] and overall survival [HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.08-0.74)]. Adverse somatic mutations were not associated with survival. After adjustment for prehepatectomy chemotherapy, synchronous disease, and ≥2 CLM, ctDNA+/- and ctDNA-/- were independently associated with improved RFS compared to ctDNA+/+ (ctDNA+/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53; ctDNA-/-: HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.56)., Conclusions: Perioperative ctDNA dynamics are associated with survival, identify patients with high recurrence risk, and may be used to guide treatment decisions and surveillance after hepatectomy for patients with CLM., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is a rare gastrointestinal cancer. Factors associated with progression of HPV infection to anal dysplasia and cancer are unclear and screening guidelines and approaches for anal dysplasia are less clear than for cervical dysplasia. One potential contributing factor is the anorectal microbiome. In this study, we aimed to identify differences in anal microbiome composition in the settings of HPV infection, anal dysplasia, and anal cancer in this rare disease., Methods: Patients were enrolled in two prospective studies. Patients with anal dysplasia were part of a cross-sectional cohort that enrolled women with high-grade lower genital tract dysplasia. Anorectal tumor swabs were prospectively collected from patients with biopsy-confirmed locally advanced SCCA prior to receiving standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients with high-grade lower genital tract dysplasia without anal dysplasia were considered high-risk (HR Normal). 16S V4 rRNA Microbiome sequencing was performed for anal swabs. Alpha and Beta Diversity and composition were compared for HR Normal, anal dysplasia, and anal cancer., Results: 60 patients with high-grade lower genital tract dysplasia were initially enrolled. Seven patients had concurrent anal dysplasia and 44 patients were considered HR Normal. Anorectal swabs from 21 patients with localized SCCA were included, sequenced, and analyzed in the study. Analysis of weighted and unweighted UniFrac distances demonstrated significant differences in microbial community composition between anal cancer and HR normal (p = 0.018). LEfSe identified that all three groups exhibited differential enrichment of specific taxa. Peptoniphilus (p=0.028), Fusobacteria (p=0.0295) , Porphyromonas (p=0.034) , and Prevotella (p=0.029) were enriched in anal cancer specimens when compared to HR normal., Conclusion: Although alpha diversity was similar between HR Normal, dysplasia and cancer patients, composition differed significantly between the three groups. Increased anorectal Peptoniphilus, Fusobacteria , Porphyromonas , and Prevotella abundance were associated with anal cancer. These organisms have been reported in various gastrointestinal cancers with roles in facilitating the proinflammatory microenvironment and neoplasia progression. Future work should investigate a potential role of microbiome analysis in screening for anal dysplasia and investigation into potential mechanisms of how these microbial imbalances influence the immune system and anal carcinogenesis., Competing Interests: CT is on the clinical advisory board of Accuracy, has a patent for oral amifostine as a radioprotectant of the upper gastrointestinal tract issued, licensed, and with royalties paid from Xerient Pharmaceuticals and a pending patent for prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors as a radioprotectant of the gastrointestinal tract, was the lead principal investigator of a multicenter trial testing the effects of high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy with the radiomodulator, GC4419, and is a paid consultant for Phebra Pty, Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elnaggar, Huynh, Lin, Hillman, Abana, El Alam, Tomasic, Karpinets, Kouzy, Phan, Wargo, Holliday, Das, Mezzari, Ajami, Lynn, Minsky, Morris, Milbourne, Messick, Klopp, Futreal, Taniguchi, Schmeler and Colbert.)

The identification of transcriptomic and protein biomarkers prognosticating recurrence risk after chemoradiation of localized squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) has been limited by a lack of available fresh tissue at initial presentation. We analyzed archival FFPE SCCA specimens from pretreatment biopsies prior to chemoradiation for protein and RNA biomarkers from patients with localized SCCA who recurred (N = 23) and who did not recur (N = 25). Tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) were analyzed separately to identify biomarkers with significantly different expression between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups. Recurrent patients had higher mean protein expression of FoxP3, MAPK-activation markers (BRAF, p38-MAPK) and PI3K/Akt activation (phospho-Akt) within the tumor regions. The TME was characterized by the higher protein expression of immune checkpoint biomarkers such as PD-1, OX40L and LAG3. For patients with recurrent SCCA, the higher mean protein expression of fibronectin was observed in the tumor and TME compartments. No significant differences in RNA expression were observed. The higher baseline expression of immune checkpoint biomarkers, together with markers of MAPK and PI3K/Akt signaling, are associated with recurrence following chemoradiation for patients with localized SCCA. These data provide a rationale towards the application of immune-based therapeutic strategies to improve curative-intent outcomes beyond conventional therapies for patients with SCCA.

Over the past two decades of successive clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), the median overall survival of both control and experimental arms has steadily improved. However, the incremental change in survival for metastatic CRC patients not treated on trial has not yet been quantified. We performed a retrospective review of 1420 patients with de novo metastatic CRC who received their primary treatment at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC) from 2004 through 2019. Median OS was roughly stable for patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 (22.6 months) but since has steadily improved for those diagnosed in 2013 to 2015 (28.8 months), and 2016 to 2019 (32.4 months). Likewise, 5-year survival rate has increased from 15.7% for patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2006 to 26% for those diagnosed from 2013 to 2015. Notably, survival improved for patients with BRAF V600E mutant as well as microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) tumors. Multivariate regression analysis identified surgical resection of liver metastasis (HR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.19-0.37), use of immunotherapy (HR = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.29-0.67) and use of third line chemotherapy (regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil, HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.95), but not year of diagnosis (HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.98-1), as associated with better survival, suggesting that increased use of these therapies are the drivers of the observed improvement in survival., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To develop recommendations for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice., Results: Five systematic reviews and 10 randomized controlled trials met the systematic review inclusion criteria., Recommendations: Doublet chemotherapy should be offered, or triplet therapy may be offered to patients with previously untreated, initially unresectable mCRC, on the basis of included studies of chemotherapy in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies. In the first-line setting, pembrolizumab is recommended for patients with mCRC and microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair tumors; chemotherapy and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair left-sided treatment-naive RAS wild-type mCRC; chemotherapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair RAS wild-type right-sided mCRC. Encorafenib plus cetuximab is recommended for patients with previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC that has progressed after at least one previous line of therapy. Cytoreductive surgery plus systemic chemotherapy may be recommended for selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases; however, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is not recommended. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be recommended following systemic therapy for patients with oligometastases of the liver who are not considered candidates for resection. Selective internal radiation therapy is not routinely recommended for patients with unilobar or bilobar metastases of the liver. Perioperative chemotherapy or surgery alone should be offered to patients with mCRC who are candidates for potentially curative resection of liver metastases. Multidisciplinary team management and shared decision making are recommended. Qualifying statements with further details related to implementation of guideline recommendations are also included.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Purpose: Acquired resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor (EGFRi) therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) has previously been explained by the model of acquiring new mutations in KRAS/NRAS/EGFR , among other MAPK-pathway members. However, this was primarily on the basis of single-agent EGFRi trials and little is known about the resistance mechanisms of EGFRi combined with effective cytotoxic chemotherapy in previously untreated patients., Methods: We analyzed paired plasma samples from patients with RAS/BRAF/EGFR wild-type metastatic CRC enrolled in three large randomized trials evaluating EGFRi in the first line in combination with chemotherapy and as a single agent in third line. The mutational signature of the alterations acquired with therapy was evaluated. CRC cell lines with resistance to cetuximab, infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, and SN38 were developed, and transcriptional changes profiled., Results: Patients whose tumors were treated with and responded to EGFRi alone were more likely to develop acquired mutations (46%) compared with those treated in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy (9%). Furthermore, contrary to the generally accepted hypothesis of the clonal evolution of acquired resistance, we demonstrate that baseline resistant subclonal mutations rarely expanded to become clonal at progression, and most remained subclonal or disappeared. Consistent with this clinical finding, preclinical models with acquired resistance to either cetuximab or chemotherapy were cross-resistant to the alternate agents, with transcriptomic profiles consistent with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. By contrast, commonly acquired resistance alterations in the MAPK pathway do not affect sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy., Conclusion: These findings support a model of resistance whereby transcriptomic mechanisms of resistance predominate in the presence of active cytotoxic chemotherapy combined with EGFRi, with a greater predominance of acquired MAPK mutations after single-agent EGFRi. The proposed model has implications for prospective studies evaluating EGFRi rechallenge strategies guided by acquired MAPK mutations, and highlights the need to address transcriptional mechanisms of resistance.

Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients with microsatellite instability high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors. However, not all MSI-H/dMMR patients will exhibit the same ICB efficacy. Previous studies suggest that concomitant antibiotic use while receiving ICB may result in poorer outcomes. We aimed to evaluate this association in patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Materials and Methods: A single-site, retrospective review of 57 patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC that received ICB was completed. Data collected included patient demographics, ICB information, and antibiotic use. Antibiotic exposure was considered from 90 days prior to ICB through 6 weeks after initiation. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR)., Results: The majority of patients received pembrolizumab (27 [47%]) or nivolumab (17 [30%]) monotherapy as their ICB agent. Of the 57 patients, 19 (33.3%) had antibiotic exposure from 90 days prior to ICB initiation through 6 weeks after initiation with most (13 [68%]) having antibiotic use in the 30 days preceding ICB initiation. Similar ORRs were seen in both groups (P-value > .99). No difference was observed in OS (P-value .29) or PFS (P-value .36) between groups., Conclusion: Our data show no association of lower response rates or survival in those MSI-H/dMMR patients with mCRC who receive antibiotics around the initiation of ICB. This information needs to be confirmed in a larger prospective cohort., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

KRAS and NRAS mutations occur in 45% of colorectal cancers, with combined MAPK pathway and CDK4/6 inhibition identified as a potential therapeutic strategy. In the current study, this combinatorial treatment approach was evaluated in a co-clinical trial in patient-derived xenografts (PDX), and safety was established in a clinical trial of binimetinib and palbociclib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS mutations. Across 18 PDX models undergoing dual inhibition of MEK and CDK4/6, 60% of tumors regressed, meeting the co-clinical trial primary endpoint. Prolonged duration of response occurred predominantly in TP53 wild-type models. Clinical evaluation of binimetinib and palbociclib in a safety lead-in confirmed safety and provided preliminary evidence of activity. Prolonged treatment in PDX models resulted in feedback activation of receptor tyrosine kinases and acquired resistance, which was reversed with a SHP2 inhibitor. These results highlight the clinical potential of this combination in colorectal cancer, along with the utility of PDX-based co-clinical trial platforms for drug development., Significance: This co-clinical trial of combined MEK-CDK4/6 inhibition in RAS mutant colorectal cancer demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in patient-derived xenografts and safety in patients, identifies biomarkers of response, and uncovers targetable mechanisms of resistance., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Pelvic chemoradiation can have a profound effect on sexual function. Few data exist describing long-term sexual function patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients treated with intensity modulated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy (CRT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA)., Methods and Materials: We identified 248 patients with SCCA treated with CRT from 2010 to 2018 who were alive and without recurrence. We sent a PRO survey to 148 patients who agreed to participate. The survey was comprised of the PROMIS sexual function and satisfaction questionnaire, the international index of erectile function 5-item questionnaire for men, and the female sexual function index questionnaire for women. Clinical and dosimetric data were collected for each patient. We used multiple regression models to identify factors associated with sexual function PROs., Results: One-hundred twelve patients (45.2% of all eligible patients, 75.7% of administered surveys) completed the survey; 90 (80.4%) were women, 107 (95.5%) were white. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 61.5 (53.8-66.0) years. The median (IQR) interval since CRT was 51 (37-85) months. Twelve men (54.5%) and 52 women (57.1%) were sexually active. The median (IQR) age of sexually active patients was 58.2 (50.1-64) years compared with 64.8 (59.1-68.8) years for sexually inactive patients (P < .001). The median (IQR) female sexual function index score for sexually active women was 20.2 (13.6-25.1). The median (IQR) international index of erectile function 5-item questionnaire score was 14 (6.5-19)., Conclusions: Patients treated with modern CRT for SCCA experience significant long-term sexual dysfunction as reported using validated PROs. Interventions to reduce sexual toxicities and improve patient support are needed., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Definitive radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is curative for nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA). However, the true effect of chemoradiation on long-term functional outcomes is poorly understood owing to limited follow-up and patient-reported outcomes (PROs)., Methods and Materials: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 248 patients with SCCA treated with definitive intensity modulated radiation and concurrent chemotherapy from 2010 to 2018 who were alive and without recurrence. PRO measures were collected, including Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G7), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQoL), Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires (ICIQ). Models were used to determine the association between demographic, tumor, treatment, and dosimetric data with PROs., Results: One hundred twelve (45%) patients completed PROs. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] time from radiation completion to survey was 51 [37-85] months. The median scores [IQR] for FACT-G7, FIQoL, and LARS were 21 [15-24], 14 [11-16], and 32 [25-37], respectively. For men, median subscores [IQR] for ICIQ voiding and incontinence subscores were 5 [2-6] and 1 [1-3], respectively. For women, median subscores [IQR] for ICIQ voiding, incontinence, and filling were 1 [1-3], 5 [3-8], and 4 [2-5], respectively. Higher (better) FIQoL scores were associated with higher (better) FACT-G7 scores (β = 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.09; P < .001), and higher (worse) LARS scores were associated with lower (worse) FACT-G7 scores (β = -0.22; 95% confidence interval, -0.31 to -0.13; P < .001). A separate multivariable analysis revealed higher bowel bag D1% was associated with lower (worse) FIQoL (P = .001) and higher (worse) LARS (P = .003) scores. Higher bladder V40 Gy was associated with increased (worse) ICIQ voiding subscore (P = .001)., Conclusions: Patients treated with modern chemoradiation for SCCA experience significant long-term bowel toxic effects with considerable effect on quality of life. Minimizing bowel hotspots and bladder V40 Gy may improve bowel and urinary function. Other interventions to reduce long-term toxic effects and improve quality of life are needed., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Identification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) following curative intent therapies is a surrogate for microscopic residual disease for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Preclinically, in micrometastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC, increased TGF-β signaling results in exclusion of anti-tumor cytotoxic T cells from the tumor microenvironment. Bintrafusp alfa (BA) is a bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor ("TGF-β trap") and anti-PD-L1 antibody., Methods: Patients with liver-limited, MSS mCRC and with detected ctDNA after complete resection of all known tumors and standard-of-care therapy were treated with 1200 mg of BA intravenously every 14 days for six doses. The primary endpoint was ctDNA clearance. Radiographic characteristics at recurrence were compared using independent t-tests to historical data from a similar cohort of patients with liver-limited mCRC who underwent observation., Results: Only 4 of 15 planned patients received BA before the study was stopped early for loss of equipoise. There was no grade ≥3 AE. None of the patients cleared ctDNA. All patients developed radiographic recurrence by the first planned restaging. Although not detectable at prior to treatment, TGFβ3 was found in circulation in all patients at cycle 2 day 1. Compared to a historical cohort, patients administered BA developed more metastases (15 versus 2, p=0.005) and greater tumor volumes (9 cm vs 2 cm, p=0.05)., Conclusions: Treatment with BA in patients with ctDNA-detected, liver-limited mCRC did not clear ctDNA and was associated with large-volume recurrence, highlighting the potential context-specific complexity of dual TGF-β and PD-L1 inhibition.

Purpose: Patients with localized squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) who experience treatment toxicity or recurrences have few therapeutic options. Investigation into the microbiome's influence on treatment toxicity and its potential use as a predictive biomarker could improve these patients' outcomes. Our study presents the first longitudinal characterization of the SCCA tumor microbiome and its associations with treatment-related toxicities., Methods and Materials: This prospective cohort study included patients with nonmetastatic SCCA receiving standard-of-care chemoradiation therapy. Anorectal swabs of the tumor site were collected before, during, and after treatment. Patient-reported quality-of-life metrics were collected at similar time points. 16S rRNA gene sequencing was used to perform diversity and taxonomic characterization of the SCCA microbiome. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare microbial diversity and abundance over time. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare microbial profiles of high and low toxicity groups., Results: Twenty-two patients with SCCA were included in this study with a median age of 58.5 years (range, 39-77 years), and 18 (82%) were women. Alpha diversity remained relatively stable throughout chemoradiation therapy except for decreases in the Observed Features (P = .03) index at week 5 relative to baseline. Tumor microbial compositions changed significantly by the end of treatment (P = .03). Differential enrichment of bacteria at specific time points occurred during treatment, including the enrichment of Clostridia at follow-up (vs week 5, q = 0.019) and Corynebacterium at week 5 (vs baseline, q = 0.015; vs follow-up, q = 0.022). Patients experiencing high toxicity at week 5 had higher relative counts of Clostridia, Actinobacteria, and Clostridiales at baseline (P = .03 for all)., Conclusions: The tumor microbiome changes during and after chemoradiation therapy, and patient-reported toxicity levels are associated with patients' microbial profiles. Further studies into these microbial characterizations and toxicity associations will elucidate the tumor microbiome's role in predicting treatment-related outcomes for patients with SCCA., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Monotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade is ineffective for patients (pts) with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study investigates whether the combination of trametinib (T) with durvalumab (D) can alter the immune tumor microenvironment (TME) by successfully priming and activating T-cells., Methods: Open-label, single-center, phase II trial with primary endpoint of immune-related response rate for combination of T+D in refractory MSS mCRC pts (NCT03428126). T is 2 mg/day orally starting 1 week prior to D, which is given 1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks. Simon 2-stage design used to enroll 29 pts into first stage, requiring a response in two or more pts to proceed to stage 2. Tumor biopsies were collected at baseline (BL) and early on-treatment (OT) at week 4., Results: Twenty nine treated pts include 48% females, median age 48 years (range 28-75), and median prior therapies 2 (range 1-5). No grade (G) 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most common TRAE of any grade was acneiform rash, 17% being G3. One of 29 pts had confirmed partial response (PR) lasting 9.3 months (mo) for an overall response rate of 3.4%. Seven pts had stable disease (SD) and five pts (1 PR, 4 SD) demonstrated decrease in total carcinoembryonic antigen ng/mL (best percentage reduction: 94%, 95%, 42%, 34%, and 22%, respectively). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 mo (range 1.1-9.3 months). Three pts with both liver and lung metastases demonstrated discrepant responses in which clinical benefit was present in the lung metastases but not liver metastases. Comparison of BL and 4-week OT tumor tissue flow cytometry demonstrated no changes in T-cell infiltration but upregulation expression of PD-1 and Tim3 on CD8 T cells. However, expression of PD-1 and Tim3 as single markers and as coexpressed markers was observed to increase OT relative to BL (p=0.03, p=0.06 and p=0.06, respectively)., Conclusions: T+D demonstrated acceptable tolerability in pts with refractory MSS mCRC. The response rate in the first stage of the study did not meet efficacy criteria to proceed to the second stage. Specific site of metastatic disease may impact outcomes in novel immunotherapy combination trials., Trial Registration Number: NCT03428126., Competing Interests: Competing interests: BJ has a consulting or advisory role with Gritstone bio, Incyte, Taiho Oncology and Insmed Oncology. He has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Syntrix and Gateway for Cancer Research. CLH reports speaker’s fees from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, serves as an advisory board member for Briacell and the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, has received personal fees from Nanobiotix and receives funding to the MD Anderson Cancer Center from Iovance, Sanofi, Dragonfly Therapeutics, and BTG outside the submitted work. EV has a consulting or advisory role with Janssen Research and Development and Recursion Pharma. He has received research support from Janssen Research and Development. CE has a consulting or advisory role with Bayer, Boston Scientific, GSK, Halio Dx, J&J, Merck, and Natera. MJO has a consulting or advisory role with Phanes therapeutics, Pfizer, Merck, Glaxosmithkline, 3D Medicine, Nouscom, Gritstone bio, Tempus, Roche. He has received research support from Roche, Merck, BMS and Astrazeneca., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Colorectal cancer in young adults is on the rise. This rise combined with delayed childbearing increases the likelihood of colorectal cancer diagnosed during pregnancy or in the postpartum period., Methods: Electronic health records were used to identify individuals with colorectal cancer in pregnancy or the postpartum period from 1 August 2007 to 1 August 2019., Results: Forty-two cases were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 33 years. Most (93%) were diagnosed in an advanced stage (III or IV) and had left-sided colorectal cancer tumors (81%). Molecular analysis was completed in 18 (43%) women with microsatellite status available in 40 (95%). The findings were similar to historical controls. Sixty percent were diagnosed in the postpartum period. Common presenting symptoms were rectal bleeding and abdominal pain., Conclusion: Currently there is no consensus recommendation regarding how to manage colorectal cancer during pregnancy. Given the overlapping symptoms with pregnancy, patients often present with advanced disease. We encourage all health care professionals caring for pregnant women to fully evaluate women with persistent gastrointestinal symptoms to rule out colorectal cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Purpose: There has been an increase in the incidence of rectal cancer diagnosed in young adults (age < 50 years). We evaluated outcomes among young adults treated with pre-operative long course chemoradiation (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME)., Methods: The medical records of 219 patients, age 18-49, with non-metastatic, cT3-4, or cN1-2 rectal adenocarcinoma treated from 2000 to 2017 were reviewed for demographic and treatment characteristics, as well as pathologic and oncologic outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier test, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate survival outcomes., Results: The median age at diagnosis was 44 years. CRT followed by TME and post-operative chemotherapy was the most frequent treatment sequence (n = 196), with FOLFOX (n = 115) as the predominant adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no difference in sex, stage, MSS/pMMR, or pCR by age (< 45 years [n = 111] vs. ≥ 45 years [n = 108]). The 5-year rates of DFS were 77.2% for all patients, 69.8% for age < 45 years and 84.7% for age ≥ 45 years (P = .01). The 5-year rates of OS were 89.6% for all patients, 85.1% for patients with age < 45 years and 94.3% for patients with age ≥ 45 years (P = .03). Age ≥ 45 years was associated with a lower risk of disease recurrence or death on multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.97, P = .04)., Conclusion: Among young adults, patients with age < 45 years had lower rates of DFS and OS, compared to those with age ≥ 45 years. These outcomes could serve as a benchmark by which to evaluate newer treatment approaches., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Although intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is considered the standard of care for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA), few large series have reported oncologic outcomes and toxicities. In this retrospective report, we aim to describe outcomes and toxicities after IMRT-based chemoradiation (CRT) for the treatment of SCCA, evaluate the impact of dose escalation (>54 Gy), and compare concurrent fluoropyrimidine in combination with either mitomycin or with cisplatin as chemosensitizers., Methods: Patients treated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2018 with IMRT-based CRT were included. Median time to locoregional recurrence, time to colostomy, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: A total of 428 patients were included; median follow-up was 4.4 years. Three hundred and thirty-four patients (78.0%) were treated with concurrent cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine, and 160 (37.4%) with >54 Gy. Two- and 5-year freedom from locoregional failure, freedom from colostomy failure, and overall survival were 86.5% and 81.2%, respectively, 90.0% and 88.3%, respectively, and 93.6% and 85.8%, respectively. Neither dose escalation nor mitomycin-based concurrent chemotherapy resulted in improved outcomes. Mitomycin-based concurrent chemotherapy was associated with in approximately 2.5 times increased grade 3 or greater acute toxicity. Radiation dose >54 Gy was associated with approximately 2.6 times increased Grade 3 or greater chronic toxicity., Conclusions: Our results suggest IMRT-based CRT with concurrent fluoropyrimidine and cisplatin is a safe and feasible option for patient with SCCA and may cause less acute toxicity. The role for radiation dose escalation is unclear and requires further study., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) postoperatively is prognostic for recurrence for patients with stage III colon cancer. Those with sustained undetectable ctDNA will likely be cured. Eradication of minimal residual disease (per ctDNA clearance) with chemotherapy did not occur in most ctDNA-positive patients and led to eventual disease relapse. See related article by Henriksen et al., p. 507 ., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Outcomes after definitive chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma are generally favorable. However, biomarkers to further yield prognostic information are desired. Treatment-related lymphopenia as well as an elevated baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio have been associated with worse survival in several cancer types. We evaluated absolute lymphocyte count and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at baseline and at treatment-related nadir in patients with anal cancer for associations with oncologic endpoints., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 428 consecutive patients with non-metastatic anal cancer treated with definitive, intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based chemoradiation. We analyzed absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts at several timepoints: pretreatment, weekly during treatment, and in the six weeks following treatment completion. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was calculated at baseline and treatment-related nadir. We estimated oncologic endpoints using life tables and compared them using the log-rank test. We conducted univariate and multivariable time-to-event analyses using Cox proportional hazards., Results: Median absolute lymphocyte count at baseline and nadir were 1.80 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.45-2.32] k/µL and 0.26 (IQR, 0.18-0.36) k/µL, respectively, and 31% developed treatment-related grade 4 lymphopenia. Median neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio at baseline and nadir were 2.34 (IQR, 1.68-3.30) and 8.80 (IQR, 5.86-12.68), respectively. Estimates of overall survival, local failure-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and freedom from colostomy at 5 years were 87%, 86%, 82%, and 88%, respectively. Baseline and nadir absolute lymphocyte count were not associated with selected outcomes on univariate analysis. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with death included T3-T4 disease, HIV-positive status, treatment break, and baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >3. Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio showed a trend toward association with distant progression or death (P=0.07). The 5-year overall survival estimates for patients with baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios ≤3 and >3 were 92.3% and 80.6%, respectively., Conclusions: Lymphopenia during and after chemoradiation for anal cancer is common but does not appear to be associated with worse survival, recurrence, or metastases. However, elevated baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was independently associated with overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and DMFS. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical utility of baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio to guide treatment and follow-up., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-21-323). BD reports honoraria from Sermo, Inc. VKM reports honoraria from Projects in Knowledge; consulting/advisory relationships with Array Biopharma, Incyte, Servier, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Array BioPharma, EMD Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Immatics. PD reports consulting/advisory relationships with Adlai Nortye and MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid. CT reports a consulting/advisory role with Accuray. EJK reports grants from National Institutes of Health, Stand Up 2 Cancer, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Philips Healthcare, Elekta, and GE Healthcare; personal fees from RenovoRx and Taylor and Francis; and a consulting/advisory role with Augmenix. ACK reports ownership of shares in Aravive, Inc. EBH reports research funding from Merck Serono. BM serves as an unpaid editorial board member of the Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology from January 2021 to December 2022. He was not involved in editorial review of the submitted work. All reported conflicts are outside of the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Both platelets and the liver play important roles in the processes of coagulation and innate immunity. Platelet responses at the site of an injury are rapid; their immediate activation and structural changes minimize the loss of blood. The majority of coagulation proteins are produced by the liver-a multifunctional organ that also plays a critical role in many processes: removal of toxins and metabolism of fats, proteins, carbohydrates, and drugs. Chronic inflammation, trauma, or other causes of irreversible damage to the liver can dysregulate these pathways leading to organ and systemic abnormalities. In some cases, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios can also be a predictor of disease outcome. An example is cirrhosis, which increases the risk of bleeding and prothrombotic events followed by activation of platelets. Along with a triggered coagulation cascade, the platelets increase the risk of pro-thrombotic events and contribute to cancer progression and metastasis. This progression and the resulting tissue destruction is physiologically comparable to a persistent, chronic wound. Various cancers, including colorectal cancer, have been associated with increased thrombocytosis, platelet activation, platelet-storage granule release, and thrombosis; anti-platelet agents can reduce cancer risk and progression. However, in cancer patients with pre-existing liver disease who are undergoing chemotherapy, the risk of thrombotic events becomes challenging to manage due to their inherent risk for bleeding. Chemotherapy, also known to induce damage to the liver, further increases the frequency of thrombotic events. Depending on individual patient risks, these factors acting together can disrupt the fragile balance between pro- and anti-coagulant processes, heightening liver thrombogenesis, and possibly providing a niche for circulating tumor cells to adhere to-thus promoting both liver metastasis and cancer-cell survival following treatment (that is, with minimal residual disease in the liver)., Competing Interests: AKS: Consulting (Merck, Kiyatec), shareholder (BioPath), research funding (M-Trap). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Kanikarla Marie, Fowlkes, Afshar-Kharghan, Martch, Sorokin, Shen, Morris, Dasari, You, Sood, Overman, Kopetz and Menter.)

Objectives: Although colorectal cancer bowel segment location has been shown to independently predict the outcomes in early stage disease, it has not been previously studied in the setting of pulmonary metastases. We sought to determine whether colorectal cancer location affects survival after pulmonary metastasectomy., Methods: Patients who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer at a single institution from 2011 to 2018 were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of overall survival and disease-free survival. The Kaplan-Meier survival method was used to determine differences between groups., Results: A total of 194 patients were evaluated. The median follow-up, survival time, and 5-year survival rate were 36.8 months, 75.8 months, and 57%, respectively, and 122 patients (63%) had experienced disease recurrence at any location. On univariable analysis, age, primary tumor location, pulmonary nodule size, ≥3 pulmonary nodules, and intrathoracic nodal disease were associated with overall survival. On multivariable analysis, patients with left-sided tumors experienced a survival benefit (hazard ratio, 0.31; P = .036). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a median survival time of 90 months (95% confidence interval, 82 months to not reached) compared with 55 months (95% confidence interval, 49 months to not reached) for patients with left-sided and rectal tumors, respectively, after metastasectomy (P = .078). Location was not associated with disease-free survival on Cox multivariable regression., Conclusions: We found that left-sided colorectal cancer is associated with prolonged survival after pulmonary metastasectomy. Future investigations are required to determine the validity of such findings, including the effect of location in the prognostication for patients who are candidates for pulmonary metastasectomy., (Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The clinical utility of a blood-based biomarker in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is unknown. We analyzed carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a commonly employed assay for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, as a serum biomarker for patients with biopsy-proven SCCA., Materials and Methods: Medical records from 219 patients with biopsy-proven SCCA at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed under an IRB-approved protocol from 2013 to 2020 to assess for correlations between CEA levels and corresponding clinical and pathologic characteristics., Results: The mean CEA among subgroups by clinical status at the time of presentation to our institution was highest among those patients with metastatic SCCA to visceral organs (M-V, 20.7 ng/mL), however this finding was not statistically significant by ANOVA ( p = .74). By clinical subgroup, the percentage of patients with an abnormally elevated CEA was highest in those patients with metastatic disease to lymph nodes (M-L, 41.2%) followed by recurrent/unresectable SCCA (36.8%), and metastatic SCCA to visceral organs (M-V, 35.2%), and was statistically significant between groups (Fisher's exact test p = .02). Using RECIST criteria for tumor progression and disease response, the mean change in CEA for patients with progression was an increase in 19 ng/mL, compared to a change of -7.3 ng/mL in those with disease response ( p = .004). We likewise assessed whether CEA levels were associated with survival outcomes for all patients with metastatic SCCA, and found no correlation between CEA and likelihood for survival in a ROC analysis (multivariate, age-adjusted analysis for CEA cutoff of 8, HR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.52-1.96)., Conclusions: Despite interesting patterns of abnormally high CEA in SCCA patients with advanced disease, and correlation of increased CEA with disease progression (and conversely decreased CEA with disease response), CEA is not associated with survival outcomes in SCCA, and is not a clinically relevant biomarker in this disease., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright: © 2021 Hester et al.)

Purpose: KRAS p.G12C mutations occur in approximately 3% of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). Recently, two allosteric inhibitors of KRAS p.G12C have demonstrated activity in early phase clinical trials. There are no robust studies examining the behavior of this newly targetable population., Methods: We queried the MD Anderson Cancer Center data set for patients with colorectal cancer who harbored KRAS p.G12C mutations between January 2003 and September 2019. Patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) and compared against KRAS nonG12C. Next, we analyzed several internal and external data sets to assess immune signatures, gene expression profiles, hypermethylation, co-occurring mutations, and proteomics., Results: Among the 4,632 patients with comprehensive molecular profiling, 134 (2.9%) were found to have KRAS p.G12C mutations. An additional 53 patients with single gene sequencing were included in clinical data but excluded from prevalence analysis allowing for 187 total patients. Sixty-five patients had de novo metastatic disease and received a median of two lines of chemotherapy without surgical intervention. For the first three lines of chemotherapy, the median PFS was 6.4 months (n = 65; 95% CI, 5.0 to 7.4 months), 3.9 months (n = 47; 95% CI, 2.9 to 5.9 months), and 3.0 months (n = 21; 95% CI, 2.0 to 3.4 months), respectively. KRAS p.G12C demonstrated higher rates of basal EGFR activation compared with KRAS nonG12C. When compared with an internal cohort of KRAS nonG12C, KRAS p.G12C patients had worse OS., Conclusion: PFS is poor for patients with KRAS p.G12C metastatic colorectal cancer. OS was worse in KRAS p.G12C compared with KRAS nonG12C patients. Our data highlight the innate resistance to chemotherapy for KRAS p.G12C patients and serve as a historical comparator for future clinical trials., Competing Interests: John Paul Shen Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Agios, SNDX Van K. Morris Honoraria: Projects in Knowledge Consulting or Advisory Role: Array Biopharma, Incyte, Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Array BioPharma, EMD Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Immatics Arvind Dasari Consulting or Advisory Role: Ipsen, Novartis, Voluntis, Lexicon, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Hutchison MediPharma Research Funding: Novartis, Eisai, Hutchison MediPharma, Merck, Guardant Health, Ipsen Kanwal Raghav Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo Bryan Kee Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Medtronic Shubham Pant Honoraria: 4D Pharma Consulting or Advisory Role: TYME, Xencor, Zymeworks Research Funding: Mirati Therapeutics, Lilly, RedHill Biopharma, Xencor, Five Prime Therapeutics, Novartis, Rgenix, Sanofi/Aventis, ArQule, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Onco Response, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Astellas Pharma David Fogelman Employment: Merck Stock and Other Ownership Interests: GTx Consulting or Advisory Role: Incyte Robert A. Wolff Honoraria: Modern Medicine Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalties from McGraw-Hill: Editor: M.D. Anderson Manual of Medical Oncology, 3rd edition David Hong Stock and Other Ownership Interests: MolecularMatch, Presagia, OncoResponse Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Guidepoint Global, GLG, Alphasights, Axiom Biotechnologies, Merrimack, Medscape, Numab, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Trieza Therapeutics, WebMD, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Adaptimmune, Boxer Capital, EcoR1 Capital, Tavistock, Baxter, COG, Genentech, GroupH, H.C. Wainwright, Janssen, Acuta, HCW Precision, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Prime Oncology, ST Cube, WebMD, GroupH Research Funding: Genentech, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Adaptimmune, Abbvie, Bayer, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, MedImmune, Molecular Templates, Seattle Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Fate Therapeutics, Pfizer, Aldai Norte, Novartis, Numab, Turning Point Therapeutics, Verstatem, Kyowa, Lilly, Loxo, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Genmab, Ignyta, Mirati Therapeutics, miRNA, Mologen, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Navier, VM Pharma, Erasca, Inc Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Genmab, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, Bayer Schering Pharma, ASCO, AACR, miRNA, Loxo Michael J. Overman Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, Gritstone Oncology, MedImmune, Novartis, Promega, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma, Janssen, Janssen, Pfizer Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche, MedImmune Scott Kopetz Stock and Other Ownership Interests: MolecularMatch, Navire, Lutris Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Genentech, EMD Serono, Merck, Navire, Symphogen, Holy Stone Healthcare, Amgen, Novartis, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Biomedical, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer Health, Pierre Fabre, EMD Serono, Redx Pharma, Ipsen, Daiichi Sankyo, Natera, HalioDx, Lutris, Jacobio, Pfizer, Repare Therapeutics, Inivata, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Research Funding: Sanofi, Biocartis, Guardant Health, Array BioPharma, Genentech/Roche, EMD Serono, MedImmune, Novartis, Amgen, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo Benny Johnson Consulting or Advisory Role: Gritstone Oncology, Incyte, Taiho Oncology Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Syntrix No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.John Paul Shen Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Agios, SNDX Van K. Morris Honoraria: Projects in Knowledge Consulting or Advisory Role: Array Biopharma, Incyte, Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Array BioPharma, EMD Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Immatics Arvind Dasari Consulting or Advisory Role: Ipsen, Novartis, Voluntis, Lexicon, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Hutchison MediPharma Research Funding: Novartis, Eisai, Hutchison MediPharma, Merck, Guardant Health, Ipsen Kanwal Raghav Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo Bryan Kee Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Medtronic Shubham Pant Honoraria: 4D Pharma Consulting or Advisory Role: TYME, Xencor, Zymeworks Research Funding: Mirati Therapeutics, Lilly, RedHill Biopharma, Xencor, Five Prime Therapeutics, Novartis, Rgenix, Sanofi/Aventis, ArQule, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Onco Response, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Astellas Pharma David Fogelman Employment: Merck Stock and Other Ownership Interests: GTx Consulting or Advisory Role: Incyte Robert A. Wolff Honoraria: Modern Medicine Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalties from McGraw-Hill: Editor: M.D. Anderson Manual of Medical Oncology, 3rd edition David Hong Stock and Other Ownership Interests: MolecularMatch, Presagia, OncoResponse Consulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Guidepoint Global, GLG, Alphasights, Axiom Biotechnologies, Merrimack, Medscape, Numab, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Trieza Therapeutics, WebMD, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Adaptimmune, Boxer Capital, EcoR1 Capital, Tavistock, Baxter, COG, Genentech, GroupH, H.C. Wainwright, Janssen, Acuta, HCW Precision, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Prime Oncology, ST Cube, WebMD, GroupH Research Funding: Genentech, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Adaptimmune, Abbvie, Bayer, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Kite Pharma, MedImmune, Molecular Templates, Seattle Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Fate Therapeutics, Pfizer, Aldai Norte, Novartis, Numab, Turning Point Therapeutics, Verstatem, Kyowa, Lilly, Loxo, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Genmab, Ignyta, Mirati Therapeutics, miRNA, Mologen, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Navier, VM Pharma, Erasca, Inc Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Genmab, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, Bayer Schering Pharma, ASCO, AACR, miRNA, Loxo Michael J. Overman Consulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, Gritstone Oncology, MedImmune, Novartis, Promega, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma, Janssen, Janssen, Pfizer Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Roche, MedImmune Scott Kopetz Stock and Other Ownership Interests: MolecularMatch, Navire, Lutris Consulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Genentech, EMD Serono, Merck, Navire, Symphogen, Holy Stone Healthcare, Amgen, Novartis, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Biomedical, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer Health, Pierre Fabre, EMD Serono, Redx Pharma, Ipsen, Daiichi Sankyo, Natera, HalioDx, Lutris, Jacobio, Pfizer, Repare Therapeutics, Inivata, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz Pharmaceuticals Research Funding: Sanofi, Biocartis, Guardant Health, Array BioPharma, Genentech/Roche, EMD Serono, MedImmune, Novartis, Amgen, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo Benny Johnson Consulting or Advisory Role: Gritstone Oncology, Incyte, Taiho Oncology Research Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Syntrix No other potential conflicts of interest were reported., (© 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Purpose: BRAF V600E mutations are rarely associated with objective responses to the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Blockade of BRAF V600E by vemurafenib causes feedback upregulation of EGFR, whose signaling activities can be impeded by cetuximab., Methods: One hundred six patients with BRAF V600E -mutated metastatic CRC previously treated with one or two regimens were randomly assigned to irinotecan and cetuximab with or without vemurafenib (960 mg PO twice daily)., Results: Progression-free survival, the primary end point, was improved with the addition of vemurafenib (hazard ratio, 0.50, P = .001). The response rate was 17% versus 4% ( P = .05), with a disease control rate of 65% versus 21% ( P < .001). A decline in circulating tumor DNA BRAF V600E variant allele frequency was seen in 87% versus 0% of patients ( P < .001), with a low incidence of acquired RAS alterations at the time of progression. RNA profiling suggested that treatment benefit did not depend on previously established BRAF subgroups or the consensus molecular subtype., Conclusion: Simultaneous inhibition of EGFR and BRAF combined with irinotecan is effective in BRAF V600E -mutated CRC.

Patient-specific biomarkers form the foundation of precision medicine strategies. To realize the promise of precision medicine in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), access to cost-effective, convenient, and safe assays is critical. Improvements in diagnostic technology have enabled ultrasensitive and specific assays to identify cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from a routine blood draw. Clinicians are already employing these minimally invasive assays to identify drivers of therapeutic resistance and measure genomic heterogeneity, particularly when tumor tissue is difficult to access or serial sampling is necessary. As cfDNA diagnostic technology continues to improve, more innovative applications are anticipated. In this review, we focus on four clinical applications for cfDNA analysis in the management of CRC: detecting minimal residual disease, monitoring treatment response in the metastatic setting, identifying drivers of treatment sensitivity and resistance, and guiding therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance.

Purpose: Consensus molecular subtyping (CMS) of colorectal cancer has potential to reshape the colorectal cancer landscape. We developed and validated an assay that is applicable on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of colorectal cancer and implemented the assay in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory., Experimental Design: We performed an in silico experiment to build an optimal CMS classifier using a training set of 1,329 samples from 12 studies and validation set of 1,329 samples from 14 studies. We constructed an assay on the basis of NanoString CodeSets for the top 472 genes, and performed analyses on paired flash-frozen (FF)/FFPE samples from 175 colorectal cancers to adapt the classifier to FFPE samples using a subset of genes found to be concordant between FF and FFPE, tested the classifier's reproducibility and repeatability, and validated in a CLIA-certified laboratory. We assessed prognostic significance of CMS in 345 patients pooled across three clinical trials., Results: The best classifier was weighted support vector machine with high accuracy across platforms and gene lists (>0.95), and the 472-gene model outperforming existing classifiers. We constructed subsets of 99 and 200 genes with high FF/FFPE concordance, and adapted FFPE-based classifier that had strong classification accuracy (>80%) relative to "gold standard" CMS. The classifier was reproducible to sample type and RNA quality, and demonstrated poor prognosis for CMS1-3 and good prognosis for CMS2 in metastatic colorectal cancer ( P < 0.001)., Conclusions: We developed and validated a colorectal cancer CMS assay that is ready for use in clinical trials, to assess prognosis in standard-of-care settings and explore as predictor of therapy response., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

An increasing number of studies are describing potential uses of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the care of patients with colorectal cancer. Owing to this rapidly developing area of research, the Colon and Rectal-Anal Task Forces of the United States National Cancer Institute convened a panel of multidisciplinary experts to summarize current data on the utility of ctDNA in the management of colorectal cancer and to provide guidance in promoting the efficient development and integration of this technology into clinical care. The panel focused on four key areas in which ctDNA has the potential to change clinical practice, including the detection of minimal residual disease, the management of patients with rectal cancer, monitoring responses to therapy, and tracking clonal dynamics in response to targeted therapies and other systemic treatments. The panel also provides general guidelines with relevance for ctDNA-related research efforts, irrespective of indication.