Search

Purpose: SRS MapCHECK (SMC) is a commercially available patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) tool for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications. This study investigates the effects of degree of modulation, location off-axis, and low dose threshold (LDT) selection on gamma pass rates (GPRs) between SMC and treatment planning system, Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA), or Vancouver Island Monte Carlo (VMC++ algorithm) system calculated dose distributions., Methods: Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with modulation factors (MFs) ranging from 2.7 to 10.2 MU/cGy were delivered to SMC at isocenter and 6 cm off-axis. SMC measured dose distributions were compared against AAA and VMC++ via gamma analysis (3%/1 mm) with LDT of 10% to 80% using SNC Patient software., Results: Comparing on-axis SMC dose against AAA and VMC++ with LDT of 10%, all AAA-calculated plans met the acceptance criteria of GPR ≥ 90%, and only one VMC++ calculated plan was marginally outside the acceptance criteria with pass rate of 89.1%. Using LDT of 80% revealed decreasing GPR with increasing MF. For AAA, GPRs reduced from 100% at MF of 2.7 MU/cGy to 57% at MF of 10.2 MU/cGy, and for VMC++ calculated plans, the GPRs reduced from 89% to 60% in the same MF range. Comparison of SMC dose off-axis against AAA and VMC++ showed more pronounced reduction of GPR with increasing MF. For LDT of 10%, AAA GPRs reduced from 100% to 83% in the MF range of 2.7 to 9.8 MU/cGy, and VMC++ GPR reduced from 100% to 91% in the same range. With 80% LDT, GPRs dropped from 100% to 42% for both algorithms., Conclusions: MF, dose calculation algorithm, and LDT selections are vital in VMAT-based SRT PSQA. LDT of 80% enhances sensitivity of gamma analysis for detecting dose differences compared to 10% LDT. To achieve better agreement between calculated and SMC dose, it is recommended to limit the MF to 4.6 MU/cGy on-axis and 3.6 MU/cGy off-axis., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

The stability of dosiomics features (DFs) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for detecting disparities in helical tomotherapy planned dose distributions was assessed. Treatment plans of 18 prostate patients were recalculated using the followings: field width (WF) (2.5 vs. 5), pitch factor (PF) (0.433 vs. 0.444), and modulation factor (MF) (2.5 vs. 3). From each of the eight plans per patient, ninety-three original and 744 wavelet-based DFs were extracted, using 3D-Slicer software, across six regions including: target volume (PTV), pelvic lymph nodes (PTV-LN), PTV + PTV-LN (PTV-All), one cm rind around PTV-All (PTV-Ring), rectum, and bladder. For the resulting DFs and DVH parameters, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated, and using hierarchical clustering, the features were classified into low/high variability. The significance of parameters on instability was analyzed by a three-way analysis of variance. All DF's were stable in PTV, PTV-LN, and PTV-Ring (average CV ( CV ¯ )  ≤ 0.36). Only one feature in the bladder ( CV ¯  = 0.9), rectum ( CV ¯  = 0.4), and PTV-All ( CV ¯  = 0.37) were considered unstable due to change in MF in the bladder and WF in the PTV-All. The value of CV ¯ for the wavelet features was much higher than that for the original features. Out of 225 unstable wavelet features, 84 features had CV ¯  ≥ 1. The CVs for all the DVHs remained very small ( CV ¯ < 0.06). This study highlights that the sensitivity of DFs to changes in tomotherapy planning parameters is influenced by the region and the DFs, particularly wavelet features, surpassing the effectiveness of DVHs., (© 2024. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.)

Objective: The aim of this study is to makethe standard total body irradiation (TBI) protocol for Helical tomotherapy© (HT) and to analyze the optimal pitch and modulation factor (MF) with respect to dose homogeneity index (HI), target dose coverage, target overdose, beam on time (BOT) and mean lung dose., Materials and Methods: Ten patients who underwent high-dose TBI were taken for this study. For each patient, 35 dose plans were created by different combination of pitch and MF. The optimal pitch and MF were deduced using scatter plot and regression methodology based on target coverage, HI, target volume receiving 103%(V103%), 105%(V105%) and 107% (V107%) of the prescription dose and BOT. Using these optimal pitch and MF, the final dose plan was made and the planning aim and achieved dose was compared using two tailed student's t-test. Radiochromic films and ionization chambers were used to measure the delivered dose using anthropomorphic phantom on various points for the head and pelvis regions to verify the skin flash margin and its effect on skin dose., Results: The optimal pitch and MF value were 0.287 and 2.4 respectively. Based on optimal pitch and MF, the mean BOT was 1692 seconds with optimal inhomogeneity (7.4%). For target, D95 and D98 were 97.09% (range:94.7-99.6%, p=0.002) and 93.9% (range:91.5-94.4%,p=0.007) respectively, and mean D2 was within 107% with SD of ±1.22% (p=0.04). The mean of PTV receiving V103, V105 and V107 was 24.48% (range=7.7-36.6%, p=0.03), 5.76% (range=1.4-12.1%, SD=±3.3%), 1.93% (range=0.1-4.6%, p=0.008) respectively. Our measurements show that the flash margin did not increase the skin dose., Conclusion: In our study, the optimal combination of pitch value of 0.287 and MF value of 2.4 provided acceptable plans for all patients planned for TBI in HT. The flash margin can provide adequate coverage during patient position uncertainty without increasing the skin dose.

A Circular-Sectorial Phase Segmentation (CSPS) noniterative method for effectively generating and manipulating muti-focus array (MFA) was proposed in this work. The theoretical model of the CSPS was built up based on vectorial diffraction integral and the phase modulation factor was deduced with inverse fast Fourier transform. By segmenting the entrance pupil into specified regions, which were sequentially assigned with the values carried out by phase modulation factor, the methodology could generate flexible MFAs with desired position and morphology. Subsequently, the CSPS was investigated in parallelized fabrication with a laser direct writing system. The positioning accuracy was greater than 96% and the morphologic consistency of the parallelly fabricated results was greater than 92%.

Purpose: Total body irradiation (TBI) can be safely delivered on TomoTherapy (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in both pediatric and adult patients with proper imaging and planning despite the length constraint of 135 cm. To overcome this limitation, two CT (Computed Tomography) scans (CT1& CT2) are taken in patients above 135 cm in height. Adequate junction dose coverage is important in TBI. Presently, there is no clinical report with a focus on the quality of dose distribution at the CT junction in view of the guidelines on quality of coverage from the RTOG. Hence, our main objectives were to evaluate the dose distribution and quality of coverage at the junction in 16 patients who received TBI using TomoTherapy., Methods: PTV(upper) and PTV(lower) along with a junction were created on CT1 and CT2, respectively. Subsequently, the 10 cm junction in the thigh region was divided into five target volumes of 2 cm thickness with dose prescription ranging from 10 to 90% to deliver a total dose equal to 100% when fused., Results: The D 50 was equal to the prescribed dose in most of the cases ranging from 99.5 to 104% for PTV(upper), 100-103% for PTV(lower), and 99.5-108% for junctional PTVs (1PTV, 2PTV, 3PTV, 4PTV, and 5PTV). The average D 95 doses from PTV(upper) and PTV(lower) were 97 ± 1.4% and 96.7 ± 1.08%, respectively. The average D 95 doses for 1PTV, 2PTV, 3PTV, 4PTV, and 5PTV were 96.1 ± 1.88%, 91.6 ± 1.82%, 87.3 ± 1.5%, 91.6 ± 1.4%, and 96.2 ± 1.5% respectively. Q RTOG values ranged between 0.85 and 1.05 and were in concordance with RTOG guidelines., Conclusion: Since junction-based planning was required for most TBI patients, it is essential to evaluate the quality of dose coverage in the junction for better TBI plans., (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Helical TomoTherapy allows a highly conformal dose distribution to complex target geometries with a good protection of organs at risk. However, the small field sizes associated with this method are a possible source of dosimetrical uncertainties. The IAEA has published detector-specific field output correction factors for static fields of the TomoTherapy in the TRS483. This work investigates the average subfield size of helical TomoTherapy plans., Material and Methods: A new parameter for helical TomoTherapy was defined - the fluence-weighted average subfield size. The subfield sizes were extracted from the leaf-opening time sinograms in the RT-plan files for 30 clinical prostate and head and neck plans and were put in relation to Delat4 Phantom+ measurement results. Additionally the influence of planning parameters on the subfield size was studied by varying the modulation factor, number of iterations and pitch in the dose optimization and calculation for three different clinical indications H&N, prostate and rectum cancer. Selected plans were dosimetrically verified by Delta4 measurements to examine the reliability in dependence of the average subfield size. Furthermore, the impact of the planning parameters on a) the dose distribution, with regard to the planning target volume and regions at risks, and b) machine characteristics such as delivery time, actual modulation factor and leaf-opening times were evaluated., Results: The average equivalent square subfield lengths (s¯ eq ) of the two investigated indications did not differ significantly - prostate plans: 2.75±0.14cm and H&N plans: 2.70±0.16cm, both with a jaw width of 2.5cm. No correlation between field size and measured dose deviation was detected. The number of iterations and the modulation factor have a considerable influence on the average subfield size. The higher the planned modulation factor and the more iterations are used during optimization, the smaller is the subfield size. In our pilot study plans were calculated with field sizes s¯ eq between 4.2cm and 1.7cm, with a jaw width of 2.5cm. Again, the measurement results of Delta4 showed no significant deviation from the doses calculated by the TomoTherapy planning system for the whole range of subfield sizes, and no significant correlation between field sizes and dose deviations was found. As expected, the clinical dose distribution improved with increasing modulation factor and an increasing number of iterations. The compromise between an improved dose distribution and smaller s¯ eq was shown., Conclusion: In this work, a method was presented to determine the average subfield size for helical TomoTherapy plans. The response of the Delta4 did not show any dependence on field size in the range of the field sizes covered by the studied plans. The influence of the subfield sizes on other dosimetry systems remains to be investigated., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Purpose: Since the modulation factor (MF) impacts both plan quality and delivery efficiency in tomotherapy Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) treatment planning, the purpose of this study was to demonstrate a technique in determining an efficient MF from the Multileaf Collimator (MLC) leaf-open time (LOT) distribution of a tomotherapy treatment delivery plan., Methods: Eight clinical plans of varying complexity were optimized with the highest allowed MF on the Accuracy Precision treatment planning system. Using a central limit theorem argument a range of reduced MFs were then determined from the first two moments of the LOT distribution. A step down approach was used to calculate the reduced-MF plans and plan comparison tools available on the Precision treatment planning system were used to evaluate dose differences with the reference plan., Results: A reduced-MF plan that balanced delivery time and dosimetric quality was found from the set of five MFs determined from the LOT distribution of the reference plan. The reduced-MF plan showed good agreement with the reference plan (target and critical organ dose-volume region of interest dose differences were within 1% and 2% of prescription dose, respectively)., Discussion: Plan evaluation and acceptance criteria can vary depending on individual clinical expectations and dosimetric quality trade-offs. With the scheme presented in this paper a planner should be able to efficiently generate a high-quality plan with efficient delivery time without knowing a good MF beforehand., Conclusion: A methodology for deriving a reduced MF from the LOT distribution of a high MF treatment plan using the central limit theorem has been presented. A scheme for finding a reduced MF from a set of MFs that results in a plan balanced in both dosimetric quality and treatment delivery efficiency has also been presented., (© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

A low modulation factor (MF) maintaining a good dose distribution contributes to the shortening of the delivery time and efficiency of the treatment plan in helical tomotherapy. The purpose of this study was to reduce the delivery time using initial values and the upper limit values of MF. First, patients with head and neck cancer (293 cases) or prostate cancer (181 cases) treated between June 2011 and July 2015 were included in the analysis of MF values. The initial MF value (MF initial ) was defined as the average MF actual value, and the upper limit of the MF value (MF UL ) was defined according the following equation: MF UL = 2 × standard deviation of MF actual value + the average MF actual Next, a treatment plan was designed for patients with head and neck cancer (62 cases) and prostate cancer (13 cases) treated between December 2015 and June 2016. The average MF actual value for the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and prostate cases decreased from 2.1 to 1.9 (p = 0.0006), 1.9 to 1.6 (p < 0.0001), 2.0 to 1.7 (p < 0.0001), and 1.8 to 1.6 (p = 0.0004) by adapting the MF initial and the MF UL values, respectively. The average delivery time for the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and prostate cases also decreased from 19.9 s cm -1 to 16.7 s cm -1 (p < 0.0001), 15.0 s cm -1 to 13.9 s cm -1 (p = 0.025), 15.1 s cm -1 to 13.8 s cm -1 (p = 0.015), and 23.6 s cm -1 to 16.9 s cm -1 (p = 0.008) respectively. The delivery time was shortened by the adaptation of MF initial and MF UL values with a reduction in the average MF actual for head and neck cancer and prostate cancer cases., (© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

The workload for shielding purposes of modern linear accelerators (linacs) consists of primary and scatter radiation which depends on the dose delivered to isocenter (cGy) and leakage radiation which depends on the monitor units (MUs). In this study, we report on the workload for 10 treatment vaults in terms of dose to isocenter (cGy), monitor units delivered (MUs), number of treatment sessions (Txs), as well as, use factors (U) and modulation factors (CI) for different treatment techniques. The survey was performed for the years between 2006 and 2015 and included 16 treatment machines which represent different generations of Varian linear accelerators (6EX, 600C, 2100C, 2100EX, and TrueBeam) operating at different electron and x-ray energies (6, 9, 12, 16 and 20 MeV electrons and, 6 and 15 MV x-rays). An institutional review board (IRB) approval was acquired to perform this study. Data regarding patient workload, dose to isocenter, number of monitor units delivered, beam energies, gantry angles, and treatment techniques were exported from an ARIA treatment management system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, Ca.) into Excel spreadsheets and data analysis was performed in Matlab. The average (± std-dev) number of treatment sessions, dose to isocenter, and number of monitor units delivered per week per machine in 2006 was 119 ± 39 Txs, (300 ± 116) × 10 2 cGys, and (78 ± 28) × 10 3 MUs respectively. In contrast, the workload in 2015 was 112 ± 40 Txs, (337 ± 124) × 10 2 cGys, and (111 ± 46) × 10 3 MUs. 60% of the workload (cGy) was delivered using 6 MV and 30% using 15 MV while the remaining 10% was delivered using electron beams. The modulation factors (MU/cGy) for IMRT and VMAT were 5.0 (± 3.4) and 4.6 (± 1.6) respectively. Use factors using 90° gantry angle intervals were equally distributed (~0.25) but varied considerably among different treatment techniques. The workload, in terms of dose to isocenter (cGy) and subsequently monitor units (MUs), has been steadily increasing over the past decade. This increase can be attributed to increased use of high dose hypo-fractionated regimens (SBRT, SRS) and the increase in use of IMRT and VMAT, which require higher MUs per cGy as compared to more conventional treatment (3DCRT). Meanwhile, the patient workload in terms of treatment sessions per week remained relatively constant. The findings of this report show that variables used for shielding purposes still fall within the recommendation of NCRP Report 151., (© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background and Purpose: To determine the optimum combination of treatment parameters between pitch, field width (FW) and modulation factor (MF) for extremity sarcomas in tomotherapy., Materials and Methods: Six patients previously treated for extremity sarcomas (3 arms and 3 legs) with tomotherapy were included in this study. 288 treatment plans were recalculated, corresponding to all combinations between 2 FW (2.5 and 5 cm), 4 MF (1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3) and 6 pitches (0.215, 0.287, 0.43 and 3 off-axis pitches). The treatment parameters (MF, FW or pitch) are modified between each plan, and the calculation is relaunched for 400 iterations, without modifying the optimisation constraints of the plan under which the patient has been treated., Results: We suggest eliminating the 0.43 pitch and never combining a 0.215 pitch with an MF ≤ 2. We also do not recommend using an MF = 1.5 unless treatment time is an absolute priority over plan quality. We did not see any advantage in using Chen off-axis pitches, except for targets far from the axis (>15 cm) treated with a high pitch. A combination of MF = 2/FW = 5 cm/pitch = 0.287 gives plans of acceptable quality, combined with reduced treatment times. These conclusions are true only for extremity sarcomas treated in 2 Gy/fraction., Conclusions: We have shown that the choice of pitch/MF/FW combination is crucial for the treatment of extremity sarcomas in tomotherapy: some produce good dosimetric quality with a reduced irradiation time, while others may increase the time without improving the quality., (Copyright © 2015 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)