Search

Background: Vaccination against Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the primary preventative strategy that has been shown to reduce the burden of HPV related diseases. Zimbabwe introduced the bivalent vaccine (HPV 16/18) in the vaccination program targeting prepubescent girls in 2018. This review is an analysis of the distribution of HPV genotypes from various studies conducted in Zimbabwe to ascertain the effectiveness of the bivalent vaccine and make recommendations for future HPV vaccine choices., Summary: Zimbabwean studies have mostly reported on cervical HPV in the urban areas. The most frequent HPV genotypes from cervical sites were 16, 18, 33, 35, 45, 56 and 58. These were identified from samples with normal cytology, pre-cancer and invasive cervical cancer. The few studies that have been done in rural areas reported HPV 35 as the most frequent cervicovaginal genotype. From the anal region of individuals reporting for routine screening, HPV 16, 18, 35 52 and 58 were the most frequent. A study on genital warts identified HPV 6, 11, 16, 40, 51and 54. In a study on children with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP), HPV 6 and 11 were the most common and HPV 35 was also identified in these children. There is no available published data on HPV distribution in head and neck cancers in Zimbabwe., Key Messages: Given that 83% of cervical cancers in Zimbabwe are caused by HPV 16/18, the bivalent vaccine could cover a significant proportion of HPV related cervical cancer. The current limitation of the bivalent vaccine is its failure to prevent benign lesions such as genital warts and RRP or all cervical cancer cases in Zimbabwe. For the prevention of most HPV related conditions, the nonavalent vaccine would be the most appropriate option for the Zimbabwean population. Currently there is no vaccine that includes HPV 35, yet this genotype was frequently identified in HPV related diseases. Vaccine developers may need to consider HPV 35 when manufacturing the next generation HPV vaccines. Furthermore, boys should also be included in HPV vaccination programs to improve herd immunity, as well as prevent RRP and HPV-related head and neck cancers., (The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

The persisting burden of cervical cancer in underserved populations and low-resource regions worldwide, worsened by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, requires proactive strategies and expanded screening options to maintain and improve screening coverage and its effects on incidence and mortality from cervical cancer. Self-sampling as a screening strategy has unique advantages from both a public health and individual patient perspective. Some of the barriers to screening can be mitigated by self-sampling, and resources can be better allocated to patients at the highest risk of developing cervical cancer. This review summarizes the implementation options for self-sampling and associated challenges, evidence in support of self-sampling, the available devices, and opportunities for expansion beyond human papillomavirus testing., Competing Interests: Megan Fitzpatrick is a scientific consultant for Digi8, which aims to optimize women’s health, but has no direct relationship to the content presented herein. Dr. Fitzpatrick has received free reagents from Cepheid GeneXpert and Hologic ThinPrep vials for a prior study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2021 Lozar et al.)

Introduction: Breast cancer is among the most common cancers among women in most of Africa. However, features of histologically confirmed breast cancers presenting in specific regional populations is limited. Our study describes the clinic-pathologic features of invasive breast cancer diagnosed in women undergoing biopsy for a clinically apparent mass in Senegal, West Africa., Methods: A prospective cohort of 522 Senegalese women presenting consecutively to Dantec Hospital (University of Dakar Tumor Institute) with a breast mass were included in the study cohort. Demographic data was collected by survey and 197 (37.7%) core needle biopsy-confirmed invasive breast cancers available for review were subsequently centrally reviewed at the University of Washington in Seattle to further to characterize the pathologic features and to perform immunohistochemistry for ER/PR and HER2., Results: Seventy six (76.1%) of the 522 Senegalese women presenting for biopsy of a clinically apparent breast mass were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. The average age of a woman with invasive cancer was 46 years old, and most (83%) presented with Stage III or IV disease. The predominant histologic subtype among the 197 biopsy-confirmed cancers was invasive ductal carcinoma (98%), with few cases of invasive lobular carcinoma (2%). Cancers were classified into four clinically relevant treatment IHC groups by combined ER/PR status and HER2 status as follows: ER-/PR-, HER2- (n=92; 46.7%), ER-/PR-, HER2+ (n=20; 10.1%), ER+/PR+, HER2- (n=76; 38.6%) and ER+/PR+, HER2+ (n=9; 4.6%). Age at time of diagnosis was similar between these four subgroups although more HER2 positive cases were pre-menopausal (p=0.05). Stage of disease at presentation differed by IHC group (p=0.008), with HER2+ cancers significantly more likely to present with stage IV disease than other IHC groups, including ER-/PR-, HER2-. There were no significant differences between groups by age group, ethnicity, place of residence or birth, or parity., Conclusion: Our analysis of breast cancer cases in Senegal shows a distribution of clinically relevant IHC groups like that seen in the few prior studies of breast cancer in West Africa, with higher frequencies of triple negative cancers than in most United States and European populations. Mean age at presentation, delayed presentation, and genetic/regional risk factors likely influence these differences. A better understanding of the frequencies of the pathologic features of breast cancers in the West African population may help guide future genetic studies as well as appropriate clinical management of breast cancer in these populations., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© Megan Burke Fitzpatrick et al.)