Search

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is an inherited disease characterized by the development of large number of colorectal adenomas with high risk of evolving into colorectal tumors. Mutations of the Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene is often at the origin of this disease, as well as of a high percentage of spontaneous colorectal tumors. APC is therefore considered a tumor suppressor gene. While the role of APC in intestinal epithelium homeostasis is well characterized, its importance in immune responses remains ill defined. Our recent work indicates that the APC protein is involved in various phases of both CD4 and CD8 T cells responses. This prompted us to investigate an array of immune cell features in FAP subjects carrying APC mutations. A group of 12 FAP subjects and age and sex-matched healthy controls were studied. We characterized the immune cell repertoire in peripheral blood and the capacity of immune cells to respond ex vivo to different stimuli either in whole blood or in purified T cells. A variety of experimental approaches were used, including, pultiparamater flow cytometry, NanosString gene expression profiling, Multiplex and regular ELISA, confocal microscopy and computer-based image analyis methods. We found that the percentage of several T and natural killer (NK) cell populations, the expression of several genes induced upon innate or adaptive immune stimulation and the production of several cytokines and chemokines was different. Moreover, the capacity of T cells to migrate in response to chemokine was consistently altered. Finally, immunological synapses between FAP cytotoxic T cells and tumor target cells were more poorly structured. Our findings of this pilot study suggest that mild but multiple immune cell dysfunctions, together with intestinal epithelial dysplasia in FAP subjects, may facilitate the long-term polyposis and colorectal tumor development. Although at an initial discovery phase due to the limited sample size of this rare disease cohort, our findings open new perspectives to consider immune cell abnormalities into polyposis pathology., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Cuche, Mastrogiovanni, Juzans, Laude, Ungeheuer, Krentzel, Gariboldi, Scott-Algara, Madec, Goyard, Floch, Chauveau-Le Friec, Lafaye, Renaudat, Le Bidan, Micallef, Schmutz, Mella, Novault, Hasan, Duffy, Di Bartolo and Alcover.)

In oncology, the expanding use of multi-gene panels to explore familial cancer predisposition and tumor genome analysis has led to increased secondary findings discoveries (SFs) and has given rise to important medical, ethical, and legal issues. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics published a policy statement for managing SFs for a list of genes, including 25 cancer-related genes. Currently, there are few recommendations in Europe. From June 2016 to May 2017, the French Society of Predictive and Personalized Medicine (SFMPP) established a working group of 47 experts to elaborate guidelines for managing information given on the SFs for genes related to cancers. A subgroup of ethicists, lawyers, patients' representatives, and psychologists provided ethical reflection, information guidelines, and materials (written consent form and video). A subgroup with medical expertise, including oncologists and clinical and molecular geneticists, provided independent evaluation and classification of 60 genes. The main criteria were the "actionability" of the genes (available screening or prevention strategies), the risk evaluation (severity, penetrance, and age of disease onset), and the level of evidence from published data. Genes were divided into three classes: for class 1 genes (n = 36), delivering the information on SFs was recommended; for class 2 genes (n = 5), delivering the information remained questionable because of insufficient data from the literature and/or level of evidence; and for class 3 genes (n = 19), delivering the information on SFs was not recommended. These guidelines for managing SFs for cancer-predisposing genes provide new insights for clinicians and laboratories to standardize clinical practices.