1. Randomised controlled trial of population screening for atrial fibrillation in people aged 70 years and over to reduce stroke: protocol for the SAFER trial.
- Author
-
Mant J, Modi RN, Dymond A, Armstrong N, Burt J, Calvert P, Cowie M, Ding WY, Edwards D, Freedman B, Griffin SJ, Hoare S, Hobbs FDR, Johnson R, Kaptoge S, Lip GYH, Lobban T, Lown M, Lund J, McManus RJ, Mills MT, Morris S, Powell A, Proietti R, Sutton S, Sweeting M, Thom H, and Williams K
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Electrocardiography, England epidemiology, Female, Male, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Aged, 80 and over, Anticoagulants therapeutic use, Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis, Atrial Fibrillation complications, Stroke prevention & control, Mass Screening methods
- Abstract
Introduction: There is a lack of evidence that the benefits of screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) outweigh the harms. Following the completion of the Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke (SAFER) pilot trial, the aim of the main SAFER trial is to establish whether population screening for AF reduces incidence of stroke risk., Methods and Analysis: Approximately 82 000 people aged 70 years and over and not on oral anticoagulation are being recruited from general practices in England. Patients on the palliative care register or residents in a nursing home are excluded. Eligible people are identified using electronic patient records from general practices and sent an invitation and consent form to participate by post. Consenting participants are randomised at a ratio of 2:1 (control:intervention) with clustering by household. Those randomised to the intervention arm are sent an information leaflet inviting them to participate in screening, which involves use of a handheld single-lead ECG four times a day for 3 weeks. ECG traces identified by an algorithm as possible AF are reviewed by cardiologists. Participants with AF are seen by a general practitioner for consideration of anticoagulation. The primary outcome is stroke. Major secondary outcomes are: death, major bleeding and cardiovascular events. Follow-up will be via electronic health records for an average of 4 years. The primary analysis will be by intention-to-treat using time-to-event modelling. Results from this trial will be combined with follow-up data from the cluster-randomised pilot trial by fixed-effects meta-analysis., Ethics and Dissemination: The London-Central National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (19/LO/1597) provided ethical approval. Dissemination will include public-friendly summaries, reports and engagement with the UK National Screening Committee., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN72104369., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JM has performed consultancy work for BMS/Pfizer and Omron. FDRH reports occasional consultancy for BMS/Pfizer, Bayer and BI over the past 5 years. NA is a member of the UK National Screening Committee. MC and MS are employed by AstraZeneca, but at the time of involvement with the trial were employed by universities (King's College London and University of Leicester, respectively), for which they still hold honorary contracts. RJM’s employer, the University of Oxford, receives consultancy and licensing payments from Omron and Sensyne for BP telemonitoring interventions. GYHL is a consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo and Anthos. No fees are received personally. SJG has received honoraria from AstraZeneca for lectures at postgraduate educational meetings for primary care teams about type 2 diabetes. BF has received speaker fees, honoraria and non-financial support from BMS and Pfizer Alliance; grants to the institution for investigator-initiated studies from BMS and Pfizer Alliance; and loan devices for investigator-initiated studies from Alivecor, all were unrelated to the present trial but related to screening for AF., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF