Search

The field of precision oncology has witnessed several advances that stimulated the development of new clinical trial designs and the emergence of real-world data (RWD) as an important resource for evidence generation in healthcare decision-making. Here, we highlight our experience with an innovative approach to a set of Adaptive, Universal Principles for Real-world Observational Studies (AUPROS). To demonstrate the utility of these principles, we used a mixed-methods approach to assess three studies that follow AUPROS at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre: (1) Molecular Epidemiology of ThorAcic Lesions (METAL), (2) Translational Head And NecK Study (THANKS), and (3) CAnadian CAncers With Rare Molecular Alterations (CARMA; NCT04151342). We performed resource assessments, stakeholder-directed surveys and discussions, analysis of funding, research output, collaborations, and a Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) analysis. Based on these analyses, AUPROS is an approach that is applicable to a wide range of observational study designs. The universality of AUPROS allows for multi-purpose analyses of various RWD, and the adaptive nature creates opportunities for multi-source funding and collaborations. Following AUPROS can offer cost and logistical benefits and may lead to increased research productivity. Several challenges were identified pertinent to ethics approvals, sustainability, complex coordination, and data quality that require local adaptation of these principles., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PM is an employee at Takeda Canada Inc. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are promising for risk stratification but have mainly been developed in European populations. This study developed single- and multi-ancestry PRSs for lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in East Asian (EAS) never-smokers using genome-wide association study summary statistics from EAS (8,002 cases; 20,782 controls) and European (2,058 cases; 5,575 controls) populations. A multi-ancestry PRS, developed using CT-SLEB, was strongly associated with LUAD risk (odds ratio=1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.61,1.82), with an area under the receiver operating curve value of 0.640 (95% CI:0.629,0.653). Individuals in the highest 20% of the PRS had nearly four times the risk compared to the lowest 20%. Individuals in the 95 th percentile of the PRS had an estimated 6.69% lifetime absolute risk. Notably, this group reached the average population 10-year LUAD risk at age 50 (0.42%) by age 41. Our study underscores the potential of multi-ancestry PRS approaches to enhance LUAD risk stratification in EAS never-smokers.

Background: The 2018 ASCO pleural mesothelioma (PM) treatment guideline states that "a trial of expectant observation may be offered" in patients with asymptomatic inoperable epithelioid mesothelioma with low disease burden. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate clinical characteristics and outcomes in PM-patients managed with initial observation and deferred treatment initiation., Methods: We retrospectively collected clinicodemograhic and outcome data of patients with inoperable PM. Patients were assigned to 2 treatment decision groups: decision to start immediate systemic treatment (Immediate Treatment Group) versus observation and deferring treatment (Deferred Treatment group)., Results: Of 222 patients with advanced PM, systemic treatment was started immediately in the majority of patients (189, 85%; immediate group); treatment was deferred in 33 (15%) patients (deferred group); systemic therapy was chemotherapy-based in 91% and 79% respectively. Patients in the deferred group were older (70 vs 67 years, p = .05), less likely to have stage IV disease (28% vs. 51%, p = .08) and more often had epithelioid histology (90% vs. 70%, p = .03). Nineteen patients (58%) in the deferred group eventually received treatment. With a median follow-up time of 10.9 months median overall survival (OS) in the entire cohort was 12.4 months and was significantly longer in the deferred group (20.6 months vs. 11.5 months, p = .02). No difference in median progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line treatment between groups was seen (5.4 and 5.3 months)., Conclusion: This real-world analysis suggests that deferral of systemic therapy and close observation may not impact OS or physician-assessed PFS in selected PM-patients., Competing Interests: Disclosures SS: Grants (institutional): AstraZeneca, Janssen, BMS; Advisory boards (institutional): MSD, Merck, BMS; AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen, Roche; Travel support: Takeda, MSD, Amgen and Roche. PB: Advisory Boards: Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Astra Zeneca (no financial remuneration), Mirati (no financial remuneration), RAPT Therapeutics (no financial remuneration); Honorarium: Merck, Eli Lilly. GL: Advisory (institutional): Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Pfizer, Hoffman La Roche, Abbvie, EMD Serono, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Jazz. Grants(institutional): Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, AstraZeneca. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements derive a significant and durable clinical benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, early progression/death on treatment occurs in a subset of patients, which we term the poor prognostic ALK phenotype. This review aims to summarize the known molecular mechanisms that underlie this phenotype with a focus on variant 3 and TP53 mutations., Methods: A scoping review was performed using scientific databases such as Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies included molecular markers of poor prognosis, with a focus on TP53 mutations, variant 3 re-arrangements, and poor clinical response to TKIs., Results: Of 4371 studies screened, 108 were included. Numerous studies implicated a negative prognostic role of variant 3, likely mediated through the acquisition of on-target resistance mutations and TP53 mutations which are associated with greater chromosomal instability and mutational burden. Co-occurring variant 3 and TP53 mutations were associated with even worse survival. Other mediators of early resistance development include aberrations in cell cycle regulators and mutations in cell signaling pathways. Comprehensive genomic analysis from first-line TKI clinical trial data was unable to identify a singular genomic signature that underlies the poor prognostic phenotype but implicated a combination of pathways., Conclusions: This scoping review highlights that the poor prognostic ALK phenotype is likely composed of a heterogeneous variety of genomic factors. There remains an unmet need for a genomic assay to integrate these various molecular markers to predict this ALK phenotype., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Lorlatinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial activity versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced, ALK -positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the phase III CROWN study. Here, we report long-term outcomes from CROWN after 5 years of follow-up., Methods: Two hundred ninety-six patients with ALK -positive NSCLC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (n = 149) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 147). This post hoc analysis presents updated investigator-assessed efficacy outcomes, safety, and biomarker analyses., Results: With a median follow-up for PFS of 60.2 and 55.1 months, respectively, median PFS was not reached (NR [95% CI, 64.3 to NR]) with lorlatinib and 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 10.9) with crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.27]); 5-year PFS was 60% (95% CI, 51 to 68) and 8% (95% CI, 3 to 14), respectively. Median time to intracranial progression was NR (95% CI, NR to NR) with lorlatinib and 16.4 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 21.9) with crizotinib (HR, 0.06 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.12]). Safety profile was consistent with that in prior analyses. Emerging new ALK resistance mutations were not detected in circulating tumor DNA collected at the end of lorlatinib treatment., Conclusion: After 5 years of follow-up, median PFS has yet to be reached in the lorlatinib group, corresponding to the longest PFS ever reported with any single-agent molecular targeted treatment in advanced NSCLC and across all metastatic solid tumors. These results coupled with prolonged intracranial efficacy and absence of new safety signals represent an unprecedented outcome for patients with advanced ALK -positive NSCLC and set a new benchmark for targeted therapies in cancer.

What Is This Study About?: This is a summary of the results of an ongoing study called CROWN. In the CROWN study, researchers looked at the effects of two medicines called lorlatinib (Lorbrena) and crizotinib (Xalkori) for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had not been treated yet. Everyone in the study had changes in a gene called anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or ALK , in their cancer cells. The changes in the ALK gene can make cancer grow. This analysis looked at how well lorlatinib and crizotinib worked and their side effects in people with advanced ALK -positive NSCLC after 5 years., What Did This Study Find?: After observing people for an average of 5 years, researchers found that more people who took lorlatinib were still alive without their cancer getting worse than the people who took crizotinib. At 5 years, the probability of being alive without their cancer getting worse was 60% in people who took lorlatinib compared with 8% in people who took crizotinib. Fewer people who took lorlatinib had their cancer spread within or to the brain than the people who took crizotinib. In more than half of the people who took lorlatinib, tumors that had spread to the brain did not get worse, and no new tumors spread to the brain after 5 years. In contrast, in about half of the people who took crizotinib, tumors that had spread to the brain got worse or new tumors spread to the brain after 16.4 months. More people who took lorlatinib (115 out of 149, or 77%) had severe or life-threatening side effects than people who took crizotinib (81 out of 142, or 57%). These side effects were like the ones reported in the earlier 3-year analysis., What Do the Findings of the Study Mean?: The 5-year results from the CROWN study showed that more people who took lorlatinib continued to benefit from their treatment than those who took crizotinib. The 5-year benefit of lorlatinib in people with ALK -positive NSCLC has never been seen before. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03052608 (Phase 3 CROWN study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are recognized as distinct entities. There remains uncertainty surrounding the causal effects of smoking and alcohol on the development of these two cancer types. Here we perform multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the causal effects of smoking and alcohol on the risk of HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC in 3431 cases and 3469 controls. Lifetime smoking exposure, as measured by the Comprehensive Smoking Index (CSI), is associated with increased risk of both HPV-negative HNSCC (OR = 3.03, 95%CI:1.75-5.24, P = 7.00E-05) and HPV-positive HNSCC (OR = 2.73, 95%CI:1.39-5.36, P = 0.003). Drinks Per Week is also linked with increased risk of both HPV-negative HNSCC (OR = 7.72, 95%CI:3.63-16.4, P = 1.00E-07) and HPV-positive HNSCC (OR = 2.66, 95%CI:1.06-6.68, P = 0.038). Smoking and alcohol independently increase the risk of both HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC. These findings have important implications for understanding the modifying risk factors between HNSCC subtypes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In the era of precision oncology, identifying abnormal genetic and epigenetic alterations has transformed the way cancer is diagnosed, managed, and treated. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is an emerging epigenetic modification formed through the oxidation of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) by ten-eleven translocase (TET) enzymes. DNA hydroxymethylation exhibits tissue- and cancer-specific patterns and is essential in DNA demethylation and gene regulation. Recent advancements in 5hmC detection methods and the discovery of 5hmC in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have highlighted the potential for cell-free 5hmC as a cancer biomarker. This review explores the current and emerging techniques and applications of DNA hydroxymethylation in cancer, particularly in the context of cfDNA.

Introduction: With multiple targeted therapies approved for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is increasingly important to understand outcomes with various sequences of next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We describe contemporary sequencing patterns and treatment effectiveness of first-line (1L) and second-line (2L) treatments in patients who received second-generation ALK TKIs in the 1L treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC in the United States., Methods: A cohort of adults with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who initiated treatment with 1L alectinib or brigatinib between June 2017 and April 2021 in the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database were followed through April 2023. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) in 1L and 2L, TTD on 1L plus 2L sequential therapy (TTD2), and total time on sequential ALK TKI therapy (including beyond 2L) were evaluated., Results: Patients (N=273) were followed up for a median duration of 28.9 months. Among patients who discontinued 1L therapy, 22% died after 1L discontinuation (median time from discontinuation to death, 4.0 months) without receiving 2L therapy. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) TTD was 21.9 (15.2-25.8) and 7.3 (5.3-10.2) months in 1L and 2L, respectively. Median (95% CI) TTD2 was 29.4 (25.1-36.1) months and total time on sequential ALK TKI treatment was 28.0 (23.6-32.9) months., Conclusions: In this large real-world study, TTD2 and the total time on sequential ALK TKIs was approximately 2.5 years. The high attrition rate from 1L to 2L and the longest clinical benefit observed with 1L therapy support using the drug with the longest 1L effectiveness up front in patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Bauman reports consulting fees from EMD Serono and participation on an advisory board for BeiGene, Blueprint Medicine, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mirati, Pfizer, and Turning Point Therapeutics. Dr. G. Liu reports grant support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute, Canadian Institute of Health Research, EMD Serono, NCI (US), Pfizer, and Takeda; honoraria from AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Pfizer, and Takeda; and participation on an advisory board for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Dr. Preeshagul reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Dava Oncology, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, OncLive, PER, Pfizer, and Takeda and a leadership role at LCRF and ASCO. Dr. S. Liu reports funding support from Pfizer; grant support from AbbVie, Alkermes, Elevation Oncology, Ellipses, Genentech, Gilead, Merck, Merus, Nuvalent, Puma Biotechnology, RAPT Therapeutics, and Turning Point Therapeutics; consulting fees and participation on advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Catalyst, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Elevation Oncology, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Guardant Health, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Merus, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and Turning Point Therapeutics; and participation on data safety and monitoring board for Candel Therapeutics. Dr. Melosky reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; funding support for meetings and/or travel from Janssen, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda. Dr. Abrahami, Dr. Li, Ms. Thomaidou, and Ms. Duncan are employed by and own stocks in Pfizer. Mr. Krulewicz is employed by Pfizer and owns stock in AbbVie, Amgen, GSK, Merck, Pfizer, United Health Group, Viatris, and XLV. Dr. Rupp was employed by and owned stock in Pfizer at the time of this study. Dr. Lin has received grant support from Bayer, Elevation Oncology, Hengrui Therapeutics, Linnaeus Therapeutics, Neon Therapeutics, Novartis, Nuvalent, Relay Therapeutics, Roche, and Turning Point Therapeutics and received consulting fees from AnHeart Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, C4 Therapeutics, CLaiM Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Elevation Oncology, Ellipses, Genentech, Hyku Biosciences, Merus, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Nuvalent, Pfizer, Regeneron, Takeda, Turning Point Therapeutics, and Yuhan., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We evaluated outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who presented with brain-only metastatic (BOM) disease overall and by EGFR/ALK mutation status., Methods: We analyzed clinico-demographic, treatment and survival data for all NSCLC patients who presented to our center between 2014 and 2016 with BOM as their first presentation of metastatic disease. Differences in overall survival (OS) were evaluated using log-rank tests for NSCLC wildtype (NSCLCwt ) versus NSCLC with an ALK-rearrangement/EGFR-mutation (NSCLCmut+)., Results: Of 109 patients with BOM, median age was 68 years; 51 % were female; 69 % Caucasian; 76 % ever-smoker; 76 % adenocarcinoma; and 25 % NSCLCmut+. While 41 patients (38 %) had subsequent brain-only progressive disease (PD), 22 (20 %) developed extracranial metastases. A higher proportion of NSCLCmut+ ( vs -wt) subsequently progressed outside the brain (37 % vs 15 %, p = 0.03). Median time-to-first-extracranial-metastases was 8.5 (NSCLCmut+ ) vs 21.0 months (NSCLCwt; p = 0.23).With 17.7 months median follow-up, median-OS was 15.9 months [95%CI: 11.5-21.3; all patients]; 12.3 [7.4-18.4; NSCLCwt] and 38.9 [21.3-not reached (NR); NSCLCmut+] (p = 0.09). In 33 of 80 patients with de novo BOM, the primary tumor was treated with surgery or radiotherapy. In patients with NSCLCwt, there was no OS benefit associated with local lung tumor treatment (p = 0.68), whereas in NSCLCmut + pts, local lung tumor treatment correlated with greater OS (median-OS NR vs 21.5 months; p = 0.05)., Conclusion: In patients with NSCLCwt with BOM, we observed a -predominant pattern of brain-only secondary progression, however patients with NSCLCmut + more often progressed extracranially. In patients with NSCLCmut+ and BOM, definitive primary tumor treatment correlated with improved survival., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Sabine Schmid reports a relationship with MSD, Merck, BMS, AstraZeneca (all paid to institution) that includes: consulting or advisory. Sabine Schmid reports a relationship with 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca, 10.13039/100014554Janssen, 10.13039/100008021BMS, 10.13039/100014554Janssen (all paid to institution) that includes: funding grants. Sabine Schmid reports a relationship with Swiss Cancer League that includes: funding grants. Sabine Schmid reports a relationship with Takeda, MSD, Amgen that includes: travel reimbursement. Geoffrey Liu reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim, 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca, 10.13039/100008021Bristol Myers Squibb, 10.13039/100004334Merck, 10.13039/100016040Takeda, 10.13039/100004319Pfizer, Hoffman La Roche, 10.13039/100006483Abbvie, 10.13039/100004755EMD Serono, Eli Lilly (all insitutional) that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Purpose: A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the feasibility of implementing routine collection of the Euro-Qol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire, to inform drug and health technology reimbursement decision making., Methods: Women with breast cancer were recruited during scheduled clinic visits to an academic cancer centre. EQ-5D-5L was self-administered using electronic tablets. Diagnostic and treatment data were abstracted from patient charts. Feasibility was assessed primarily by the proportion of patients who fully completed EQ-5D-5L and by their willingness to complete the instrument at each clinic visit., Results: 588 women were approached for study participation, 341 were enrolled. Fully completed EQ-5D-5L questionnaires were obtained in 323 participants (95% of participants, 95% CI 92-97%). Median time for EQ-5D-5L completion was 1.5 minutes (range:0.35 to 14.7). Mean age of participants was 58 years old. Most women who completed EQ-5D were White, born outside Canada and presented a high education level; one-quarter had metastatic disease. Most participants reported "No problems" in all EQ-5D-5L dimensions. Mean EQ-5D-5L index and mean EQ-5D-5L VAS values for all participants were respectively 0.83 (SD 0.13) and 75.7 (SD 17.45), with patients with metastatic disease scoring the lowest values. Seventy-eight percent of participants were willing to complete EQ-5D-5L at each clinic visit; lower Charlson comorbidity index and higher education level were predictors of willingness to continue to answer EQ-5D-5L., Conclusions: Tablet-based collection of EQ-5D-5L in the context of routine clinical practice proved to be feasible. However, many patients declined study participation or reported being in full health, raising concerns about whether this method of collecting EQ-5D adequately represents the health status of all breast cancer patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Torres et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

In advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), routine testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) is recommended to identify actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). The therapeutic implications of repeated NGS testing on synchronous and metachronous tumors are unclear. Between February 2017 and October 2020, NSCLC samples from a single institution were reflex-tested using a targeted 15-gene NGS panel (TruSight Tumor 15, Illumina). Thirty-eight patients were identified with multiple NGS results from 82 samples: 11% were from single unifocal, 51% were from synchronous, and 38% were from metachronous tumors. Changes in EGFR , KRAS , PI3KCA , and TP53 variants were found in 22 patients' samples (58%). No changes were seen with longitudinal testing of multiple samples from single unifocal tumors, while changes were observed in 60% of synchronous and 71% of metachronous tumors. Of these, 26% of patients had AGA differences between samples. Acknowledging the limited sample size, a significant difference in overall survival was observed between synchronous separate primaries and metastasis. Repeat NGS testing of synchronous and metachronous NSCLC tumors may identify differing variants in >50% of patients. These changes may reflect separate primary lung carcinomas, tumor heterogeneity among intrapulmonary metastases, and clonal evolution. NGS testing of multiple tumors may enhance the identification of therapeutic targets for treatment decisions.

Background: Radon is a radioactive gas and a major risk factor for lung cancer (LC)., Methods: We investigated the dose-response relationship between radon and LC risk in the International Lung Cancer Consortium with 8927 cases and 5562 controls from Europe, North America, and Israel, conducted between 1992 and 2016. Spatial indoor radon exposure in the residential area (sIR) obtained from national surveys was linked to the participants' residential geolocation. Parametric linear and spline functions were fitted within a logistic regression framework., Results: We observed a non-linear spatial-dose response relationship for sIR < 200 Bq/m 3 . The lowest risk was observed for areas of mean exposure of 58 Bq/m 3 (95% CI: 56.1-59.2 Bq/m 3 ). The relative risk of lung cancer increased to the same degree in areas averaging 25 Bq/m 3 (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.59) as in areas with a mean of 100 Bq/m 3 (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.20-1.45). The strongest association was observed for small cell lung cancer and the weakest for squamous cell carcinoma. A stronger association was also observed in men, but only at higher exposure levels. The non-linear association is primarily observed among the younger population (age < 69 years), but not in the older population, which can potentially represent different biological radiation responses., Conclusions: The sIR is useful as proxy of individual radon exposure in epidemiological studies on lung cancer. The usual assumption of a linear, no-threshold dose-response relationship, as can be made for individual radon exposures, may not be optimal for sIR values of less than 200 Bq/m 3 ., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Concomitant high-dose cisplatin with radiotherapy is commonly used for treating head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Cisplatin, often used with radiotherapy, is known for causing irreversible sensorineural hearing loss, with individual variability suggesting a genetic component. This study aims to enhance the predictive ability of the clinical prediction model for cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) in HNSCC patients, as outlined in Theunissen et al., by incorporating significant genetic variants., Methods: Conducted at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, this retrospective study included 74 patients treated between 1997 and 2011. Thirty-one SNPs that were previously associated with CIHL or other cisplatin-induced toxicities were identified and incorporated into the model. The primary outcome measured was the change in decibels at posttreatment 1-2-4 kHz hearing levels per additional minor allele of these SNPs, evaluated using linear mixed-effects regression models. The model's predictive accuracy was determined by the area under the curve (AUC) using 10-fold cross-validation., Results: The rs2289669 SNP in the SLC47A1/MATE1 gene was linked to a significant 2.67 dB increase in hearing loss per allele (95% CI 0.49-4.86, p = 0.017). Incorporating rs2289669 improved the model's AUC from 0.78 to 0.83, a borderline significant improvement (p = 0.073)., Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of the rs2289669 SNP in CIHL and demonstrates the potential of combining genetic and clinical data for enhanced predictive models in personalized treatment strategies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Accurate assessment of GFR is crucial to guiding drug eligibility, dosing of systemic therapy, and minimizing the risks of both undertreatment and toxicity in patients with cancer. Up to 32% of patients with cancer have baseline CKD, and both malignancy and treatment may cause kidney injury and subsequent CKD. To date, there has been lack of guidance to standardize approaches to GFR estimation in the cancer population. In this two-part statement from the American Society of Onco-Nephrology, we present key messages for estimation of GFR in patients with cancer, including the choice of GFR estimating equation, use of race and body surface area adjustment, and anticancer drug dose-adjustment in the setting of CKD. These key messages are based on a systematic review of studies assessing GFR estimating equations using serum creatinine and cystatin C in patients with cancer, against a measured GFR comparator. The preponderance of current data involving validated GFR estimating equations involves the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations, with 2508 patients in whom CKD-EPI using serum creatinine and cystatin C was assessed (eight studies) and 15,349 in whom CKD-EPI with serum creatinine was assessed (22 studies). The former may have improved performance metrics and be less susceptible to shortfalls of eGFR using serum creatinine alone. Since included studies were moderate quality or lower, the American Society of Onco-Nephrology Position Committee rated the certainty of evidence as low. Additional studies are needed to assess the accuracy of other validated eGFR equations in patients with cancer. Given the importance of accurate and timely eGFR assessment, we advocate for the use of validated GFR estimating equations incorporating both serum creatinine and cystatin C in patients with cancer. Measurement of GFR via exogenous filtration markers should be considered in patients with cancer for whom eGFR results in borderline eligibility for therapies or clinical trials., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Objectives: KRAS mutations, particularly KRAS G12C , are prevalent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been a frontline treatment, but recently developed KRAS G12C -selective inhibitors, such as sotorasib, present new therapeutic options. We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study to gain insights into real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with KRAS G12C -positive advanced NSCLC receiving systemic therapy post-ICI treatment., Methods: From the CAnadian CAncers With Rare Molecular Alterations-Basket Real-world Observational Study (CARMA-BROS), a cohort of 102 patients with KRAS G12C -positive advanced NSCLC across 9 Canadian centers diagnosed between 2015 and 2021 was analyzed. Clinico-demographic and treatment data were obtained from electronic health records. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models., Results: The patients (median age 66 years; 58 % female; 99 % current/former tobacco exposure; 59 % PD-L1 ≥ 50 %), exhibited heterogeneous treatment patterns post-ICI. Most patients received ICIs as a first-line therapy, with varying subsequent lines including chemotherapy and targeted therapy. In patients receiving systemic therapy post-ICI, median overall survival was 12.6 months, and real-world progression-free survival was 4.7 months. KRAS G12C -selective targeted therapy post-ICI (n = 20) showed longer real-world progression-free survival compared to single-agent chemotherapy (aHR = 0.39, p = 0.012)., Conclusion: This study contributes valuable real-world data on KRAS G12C -positive advanced NSCLC post-ICI treatment. The absence of a standard treatment sequencing post-ICI underscores the need for further investigation and consensus-building in the evolving landscape of KRAS G12C -targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The study was supported by Amgen. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: SCLC has traditionally been considered to arise from toxic exposure factors, such as smoking. Recent evidence has revealed that germline mutations may also affect the development of SCLC; however, these alterations remain understudied. We sought to identify novel germline mutations in SCLC including germline copy number variations (CNVs) in our cohort of patients., Methods: We designed a custom hybrid-capture gene panel to evaluate germline alterations in 192 cancer-predisposition and frequently mutated genes in SCLC. We applied this panel to germline analysis of a treatment-naive cohort of 67 patients with SCLC at our institution. Subsequently, we annotated the variants using the American College of Medical Genetics criteria and further classified variants of uncertain significance using a set of in silico tools, including DeepMind AlphaMissense, MutationTaster, SIFT, and Polyphen2., Results: We identified American College of Medical Genetics pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations in seven of 67 patients. Five (71%) were novel alterations ( BCORL1 , FANCC , ATR , and BBC3 ) and a novel CNV ( SLFN11 ) with two (29%) previously described mutations ( CHEK1 and BRIP1 ). We also identified 191 variants of uncertain significance in 60 of 67 patients, of which, depending on the in silico tool, 5% to 14% were predicted to be pathogenic. Patients with SCLC with the seven pathogenic alterations were observed to have a numerically longer overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.50) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.45) though not statistically significant compared with the remaining cohort., Conclusions: Our study identifies novel germline alterations, including a CNV, and provides additional evidence that germline factors could be important contributing factors to the development of SCLC., Competing Interests: Dr. Bratman is an inventor on patents related to cell-free DNA mutation and methylation analysis technologies that have been licensed to Roche and AdelaBio, respectively, and is co-founder of, has ownership in, and serves in a leadership role at AdelaBio. Dr. Liu reports receiving grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Takeda; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees from Hoffman-La Roche, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer outside of the submitted work. Dr. Lok reports receiving grants from 10.13039/100004319Pfizer and grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background and Aims: Despite the substantial impact of environmental factors, individuals with a family history of liver cancer have an increased risk for HCC. However, genetic factors have not been studied systematically by genome-wide approaches in large numbers of individuals from European descent populations (EDP)., Approach and Results: We conducted a 2-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) on HCC not affected by HBV infections. A total of 1872 HCC cases and 2907 controls were included in the discovery stage, and 1200 HCC cases and 1832 controls in the validation. We analyzed the discovery and validation samples separately and then conducted a meta-analysis. All analyses were conducted in the presence and absence of HCV. The liability-scale heritability was 24.4% for overall HCC. Five regions with significant ORs (95% CI) were identified for nonviral HCC: 3p22.1, MOBP , rs9842969, (0.51, [0.40-0.65]); 5p15.33, TERT , rs2242652, (0.70, (0.62-0.79]); 19q13.11, TM6SF2 , rs58542926, (1.49, [1.29-1.72]); 19p13.11 MAU2 , rs58489806, (1.53, (1.33-1.75]); and 22q13.31, PNPLA3 , rs738409, (1.66, [1.51-1.83]). One region was identified for HCV-induced HCC: 6p21.31, human leukocyte antigen DQ beta 1, rs9275224, (0.79, [0.74-0.84]). A combination of homozygous variants of PNPLA3 and TERT showing a 6.5-fold higher risk for nonviral-related HCC compared to individuals lacking these genotypes. This observation suggests that gene-gene interactions may identify individuals at elevated risk for developing HCC., Conclusions: Our GWAS highlights novel genetic susceptibility of nonviral HCC among European descent populations from North America with substantial heritability. Selected genetic influences were observed for HCV-positive HCC. Our findings indicate the importance of genetic susceptibility to HCC development., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Evidence from phase three clinical trials helps shape clinical practice. However, a very small minority of patients with cancer participate in clinical trials and many trials are not completed on time due to slow accrual. Issues with restrictive eligibility criteria can severely limit the patients who can access trials, without any convincing evidence that these restrictions impact patient safety. Similarly, regulatory, organizational, and institutional hurdles can delay trial activation, ultimately making some studies irrelevant. Additional issues during trial conduct (e.g., mandatory in-person visits, central confirmation of standard biomarkers, and inflexible drug dosage modification) contribute to making trials non-patient-centric. These real-life observations from experienced clinical trialists can seem nonsensical to investigators and patients alike, who are trying to bring effective drugs to patients with cancer. In this review, we delve into these issues in detail, and discuss potential solutions to make clinical trials more accessible to patients.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can yield remarkable clinical responses in subsets of patients with solid tumors but can also often lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Predictive features of clinically severe irAEs leading to cessation of ICIs have yet to be established. Using data from 1,327 patients with lung cancer treated with ICIs between 2009 and 2022 at four academic medical centers, we evaluated the association of a germline polygenic risk score for autoimmune disease and discontinuation of ICIs due to irAEs., Methods: Using Cox proportional hazards model, we assessed the association between a polygenic risk score for autoimmune disease (PRS AD ) and cessation of ICI therapy due to irAEs. All models were adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, lung cancer histology, type of therapy, recruiting center, and the first 5 principal components. To further understand the differential effects of type of therapy and disease stage on the association between PRS AD and cessation of ICI due to irAEs, we conducted stratified logistic regression analysis by type of ICI therapy and disease stage., Results: We found an association between PRS AD and ICI cessation due to irAEs (HR per SD = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.02 - 1.37, P = 0.03). This association was particularly strong in patients who had ICI cessation due to irAEs within three months of therapy initiation (HR per SD = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.08 - 1.78, P = 0.01). Individuals in the top 20th percentile of PRS AD had 7.2% ICI discontinuation for irAEs by three months, compared to 3.9% discontinuation by three months among patients in the bottom 80th percentile (log-rank P = 0.02). In addition, among patients who received combination PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy, PRS AD had an OR per SD of 1.86 (95% CI = 1.08 - 3.51, P = 0.04)., Conclusions: We demonstrate an association between a polygenic risk score for autoimmune disease and early ICI discontinuation for irAEs, particularly among patients treated with combination ICI therapy. Our results suggest that germline genetics may be used as an adjunctive tool for risk stratification around ICI clinical decision-making in solid tumor oncology.

Introduction: Approximately half of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with early-stage disease at diagnosis. Real-world outcomes data are limited for this population but are of interest given recent and impending results from trials evaluating epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and immunotherapies in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative settings., Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal, population-level study was conducted in patients diagnosed with resected stage I-III non-squamous NSCLC in Ontario, Canada, between April 2010 and March 2019. Study outcomes included patient characteristics and median overall survival (mOS), with stratification by disease stage and treatment exposure. Patients receiving EGFR-TKIs (assumed EGFR mutation-positive by proxy) were a key population of interest., Results: Among 8255 cases, 4881 had stage I, 2124 had stage II, and 1250 had stage III NSCLC at diagnosis. The mean patient age was 68 years; 53.5% were female. In the overall cohort, 19.6% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer mOS than not receiving such therapy: stage II (7.6 [95% confidence interval: 6.5-8.5] vs. 4.4 [4.0-4.9] years) or stage III (4.4 [3.6-5.1] vs. 2.7 [2.3-3.3] years), both p < 0.0001. Patients receiving treatment (EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy) were assumed to have experienced disease recurrence/relapse; mOS was longer among those receiving an EGFR-TKI than among those receiving chemotherapy (2.3 [1.8-3.0] vs. 1.1 [1.0-1.3] years)., Conclusion: In Ontario, between 2010 and 2019, uptake of adjuvant therapy was low among patients with resected NSCLC, despite such therapy being associated with improved survival. Patients assumed to have recurred/relapsed had markedly reduced mOS, regardless of subsequent therapy, compared with those who did not relapse/recur. Novel peri-adjuvant treatment options are needed to enhance outcomes after lung resection., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Lorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) indicated for the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In clinical trials, lorlatinib has shown durable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in treatment-naive patients and in those who have experienced progression while receiving first- and/or second-generation ALK TKIs. Lorlatinib has a distinct safety profile from other ALK TKIs, including hyperlipidemia and central nervous system effects. Clinical trial data showed that most adverse events (AEs) can be managed effectively or reversed with dose modifications (such as dose interruptions or reductions) or with concomitant medications without compromising clinical efficacy or quality of life for patients. A pragmatic approach to managing AEs related to lorlatinib is required. We present patient-focused recommendations for the evaluation and management of select AEs associated with lorlatinib developed by clinicians and nurses with extensive lorlatinib expertise in routine clinical practice. The recommendations follow the general framework of "prepare, monitor, manage, reassess" to streamline AE management and assist in practical, actionable, and personalized patient care., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Geoffrey Liu reports grant support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Amgen, EMD Serono and Takeda; and participation on an advisory board for AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, Bayer, Novartis, Amgen, and Takeda. Julien Mazieres reports institutional grant support from AstraZeneca, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Jan Stratmann reports personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, BMS, Oncopeptides, Amgen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Takeda, Lilly, MSD/Merck, Sanofi, Pfizer, outside of the submitted work and institutional grants from AstraZeneca outside of the submitted work. Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou reports institutional grant for clinical research from Mirati, J&J/Janssen, Pfizer, Revolution Medicine, Nuvalent, Merck, and BMS; speaker honorarium from Pfizer and J&J/Janssen; advisory honorarium from Pfizer, J&J/Janssen, AnHeart Therapeutics, Lilly, BeiGene, and DAVA Oncology; stock ownership in Turning Point Therapeutics and Elevation Oncology; and ownership (<5%) in MBrace Therapeutics and BlossomHill Therapeutics. Tony Mok reports institutional grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, G1 Therapeutics, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and Xcovery; consulting fees from AbbVie, ACEA Pharma, Adagene, Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, Bayer, BeiGene, Berry Oncology, Boehringer Ingelheim, Blueprint, BMS, Bridge Biotherapeutics, Covidien, C4 Therapeutics, Cirina, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, D3 Bio, Da Volterra, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Elevation Oncology, G1 Therapeutics, geneDecode, Gilead Sciences, Gritstone Oncology, Guardant Health, Hengrui Therapeutics, HutchMed, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, IQVIA, Janssen, Lilly, Lunit USA, Loxo Oncology, Lucence Health, Medscape/WebMD, Merck, MSD, Mirati, MiRXES, MoreHealth, Novartis, Omega Therapeutics, OrigiMed, OSE Immunotherapeutics, PeerVoice, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Puma Biotechnology, Qiming Development, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Simcere of America, Synergy Research, Takeda, Tigermed, Vertex, Virtus, and Yuhan; honoraria from ACEA Pharma, Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Daz Group, Fishawack Facilitate, InMed, Janssen, Jiahui Holdings, LiangYiHui Healthcare, Lilly, Lucence Health, MD Health Brazil, Medscape, Merck Pharmaceuticals HK, MSD, MiRXES, Novartis, OrigiMed, Permanyer, PeerVoice, Physicians’ Education Resource, Pfizer, prIME Oncology, Research to Practice, Roche Pharmaceuticals/Diagnostics/Foundation One, Sanofi-Aventis, Shanghai BeBirds Translation & Consulting, Taiho, Takeda, and Touch Independent Medical Education; travel support from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, MiRXES, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; institutional travel support from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; participation on advisory boards for AbbVie, ACEA Pharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Berry Oncology, Blueprint, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bowtie Life Insurance, BMS, C4 Therapeutics, Covidien, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, D3 Bio, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Fishawack Facilitate, G1 Therapeutics, geneDecode, Gilead Sciences, Gritstone Oncology, Guardant Health, Hengrui Therapeutics, HutchMed, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, IQVIA, Janssen, Lakeshore Biotech, Lilly, Loxo Oncology, Lunit, Merck, MSD, Mirati, MiRXES, Novartis, OrigiMed, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi-Aventis, SFJ Pharmaceuticals, Simcere of America, Takeda, Vertex, Virtus, and Yuhan; leadership or fiduciary role at AstraZeneca, HutchMed, Lunit, ACT Genomics-Sanomics Group, and Aurora Tele-Oncology; and stock ownership in AstraZeneca, Aurora Tele-Oncology, Biolidics, HutchMed, and ACT Genomics-Sanomics Group. Mary Grizzard reports no conflicts of interest. Yasushi Goto reports grant support for the clinical trial group from AstraZeneca and Pfizer; institutional grant support from AbbVie, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Preferred Networks; honoraria from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Taiho, and Thermo Fisher; participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Guardant Health, Illumina, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Taiho; and leadership or fiduciary role at Cancer Net Japan and Japanese Association of Medical Technologists. Enriqueta Felip reports institutional funding from Merck and Fundación Merck Salud; consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medical Trends, Medscape, Merck, MSD, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and Touch Oncology; and independent board membership for Grifols. Benjamin J. Solomon reports royalties for contribution to a section from UpToDate; consulting fees for participation on advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, and Roche/Genentech; honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, Takeda, and Roche/Genentech; and leadership or fiduciary role as a board member of Thoracic Oncology Group of Australia and Cancer Council of Victoria. Todd M. Bauer reports consulting fees from Bayer, Pfizer, and Lilly; honoraria from Bayer, BMS, Guardant Health, Pfizer, and Lilly; travel support from Pfizer; participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Illumina, and Pfizer; and institutional support for participation on an advisory board for Blueprint., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Use of real-world data (RWD) for external controls added to single-arm trials (SAT) is increasingly prevalent in regulatory submissions. Due to inherent differences in the data-generating mechanisms, biases can arise. This paper aims to illustrate how to use quantitative bias analysis (QBA)., Methods: Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) serves as an example, where many small subsets of patients with molecular tumor subtypes exist. First, some sources of bias that may occur in oncology when comparing RWD to SAT are described. Second, using a hypothetical immunotherapy agent, a dataset is simulated based on expert input for survival analysis of advanced NSCLC. Finally, we illustrate the impact of three biases: missing confounder, misclassification of exposure, and outcome evaluation., Results: For each simulated scenario, bias was induced by removing or adding data; hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated applying conventional analyses. Estimating the bias-adjusted treatment effect and uncertainty required carefully selecting the bias model and bias factors. Although the magnitude of each biased and bias-adjusted HR appeared moderate in all three hypothetical scenarios, the direction of bias was variable., Conclusion: These findings suggest that QBA can provide an intuitive framework for bias analysis, providing a key means of challenging assumptions about the evidence. However, the accuracy of bias analysis is itself dependent on correct specification of the bias model and bias factors. Ultimately, study design should reduce bias, but QBA allows us to evaluate the impact of unavoidable bias to assess the quality of the evidence., (© 2024 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Countries face challenges in paying for new drugs. High prices are driven in part by exploding drug development costs, which, in turn, are driven by essential but excessive regulation. Burdensome regulation also delays drug development, and this can translate into thousands of life-years lost. We need system-wide reform that will enable less expensive, faster drug development. The speed with which COVID-19 vaccines and AIDS therapies were developed indicates this is possible if governments prioritize it. Countries also differ in how they value drugs, and generally, those willing to pay more have better, faster access. Canada is used as an example to illustrate how "incremental cost-effectiveness ratios" (ICERs) based on measures such as gains in "quality-adjusted life-years" (QALYs) may be used to determine a drug's value but are often problematic, imprecise assessments. Generally, ICER/QALY estimates inadequately consider the impact of patient crossover or long post-progression survival, therapy benefits in distinct subpopulations, positive impacts of the therapy on other healthcare or societal costs, how much governments willingly might pay for other things, etc. Furthermore, a QALY value should be higher for a lethal or uncommon disease than for a common, nonlethal disease. Compared to international comparators, Canada is particularly ineffective in initiating public funding for essential new medications. Addressing these disparities demands urgent reform.

Exhausted CD8 + T cells (Texs) are characterized by the expression of various inhibitory receptors (IRs), whereas the functional attributes of these co-expressed IRs remain limited. Here, we systematically characterized the diversity of IR co-expression patterns in Texs from both human oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) tissues and syngeneic OPSCC model. Nearly 60% of the Texs population co-expressed two or more IRs, and the number of co-expressed IRs was positively associated with superior exhaustion and cytotoxicity phenotypes. In OPSCC patients, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade significantly enhanced PDCD1 -based co-expression with other IR genes, whereas dual blockades of PD-1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) significantly upregulated CTLA4 -based co-expression with other IR genes. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that highly diverse IR co-expression is a leading feature of Texs and represents their functional states, which might provide essential clues for the rational selection of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating OPSCC., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Real-world evidence for patients with advanced EGFR -mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Canada is limited. This study's objective was to use previously validated DARWEN TM artificial intelligence (AI) to extract data from electronic heath records of patients with non-squamous NSCLC at University Health Network (UHN) to describe EGFR mutation prevalence, treatment patterns, and outcomes. Of 2154 patients with NSCLC, 613 had advanced disease. Of these, 136 (22%) had common sensitizing EGFR mutations (c EGFR m; ex19del, L858R), 8 (1%) had exon 20 insertions (ex20ins), and 338 (55%) had EGFR wild type. One-year overall survival (OS) (95% CI) for patients with c EGFR m, ex20ins, and EGFR wild type tumours was 88% (83, 94), 100% (100, 100), and 59% (53, 65), respectively. In total, 38% patients with ex20ins received experimental ex20ins targeting treatment as their first-line therapy. A total of 57 patients (36%) with c EGFR m received osimertinib as their first-line treatment, and 61 (39%) received it as their second-line treatment. One-year OS (95% CI) following the discontinuation of osimertinib was 35% (17, 75) post-first-line and 20% (9, 44) post-second-line. In this real-world AI-generated dataset, survival post-osimertinib was poor in patients with c EGFR mutations. Patients with ex20ins in this cohort had improved outcomes, possibly due to ex20ins targeting treatment, highlighting the need for more effective treatments for patients with advanced EGFR m NSCLC.

Introduction: Characteristics of long-term survivors in EGFR-mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC are not fully understood. This retrospective analysis evaluated a multi-institution cohort of patients with EGFRm NSCLC treated in the pre-osimertinib era and sought to describe characteristics of long-term survivors., Methods: Clinical characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical records of patients with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC who started first-line therapy before 2015. Demographics and comutations were compared between greater than or equal to 5-year survivors and less than 5-year survivors. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with survival and the odds of death within 5 years, respectively., Results: Overall, 133 patients were greater than or equal to 5-year survivors; 127 were less than 5-year survivors. Burden of pathogenic comutations including TP53 and PIK3CA was similar between greater than or equal to 5-year survivors and less than 5-year survivors. Receipt of first-line chemotherapy rather than EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor was similar between the groups (22% of <5-y versus 31% of ≥5-y). Baseline brain metastasis and history of smoking were associated with higher odds of death within 5 years (odds ratio = 2.16, p  = 0.029 and odds ratio = 1.90, p  = 0.046, respectively). Among patients without baseline brain metastases, cumulative incidence of brain metastases at 5 years was 42.3%. Both baseline and post-baseline brain metastasis were associated with worse overall survival compared with no brain metastasis (hazard ratio = 3.26, p < 0.001 and hazard ratio = 4.99, p < 0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: Within patients treated for EGFRm metastatic NSCLC before 2015, absence of brain metastasis and nonsmoking status were predictive of 5-year survival. Our findings help to define a subset of patients with EGFRm NSCLC with excellent survival outcomes who may not require intensification of initial therapy., Competing Interests: Dr. McCoach reports working as an employee at Genentech. Dr. G. Liu reports receiving institutional grants from NCI, CIHR, CCSRI, AstraZeneca, 10.13039/100016040Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, AMGEN, EMD Serono, 10.13039/100004319Pfizer, and 10.13039/100004326Bayer; receiving personal honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, EMD Serono, and Takeda; and participating on the Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Merck, AbbVie, Jazz, Takeda, Anheart, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Lilly. Dr. Nieva reports receiving institutional grants from 10.13039/100004328Genentech and Merck; receiving consulting fees from ANP Technologies, Aadi Biosciences, AstraZeneca, BioAtla, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Mindmed, Naveris, and Sanofi; receiving travel support from 10.13039/100004325AstraZeneca; having a patent planned with Cansera; participating on the Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for Kalivir; and having stock in Amgen, Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, and Cansera. Dr. Marrone reports receiving grants from 10.13039/100016957Mirati Therapeutics and Bristol-Myers Squibb; receiving consulting fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, Janssen, Mirati, Amgen, and AstraZeneca; receiving honoraria from Merck, Regeneron, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and AstraZeneca; and participating on the Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for Puma. Dr. Lam reports receiving grants from 10.13039/100002491Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, SeaGen, and AstraZeneca; receiving consulting fees from SeaGen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Guardant Health, Takeda, and Anheart Therapeutics; and participating on the Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for Iovance Therapeutics. Dr. Velcheti reports receiving consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, OnCOC4, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novocure, Takeda, Taiho, and Regeneron. Dr. S. Liu reports receiving institutional grants from 10.13039/100006483AbbVie, 10.13039/100018529Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Elevation Oncology, Ellipses, Genentech, Gilead, Merck, Merus, Nuvalent, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Puma, RAPT, and Turning Point Therapeutics; receiving consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Catalyst, Daiichi Sankyo, Elevation Oncology, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, Guardant Health, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Merus, Mirati, Novartis, Pfizer, RAPT, Regeneron, Revolution Medicines, Sanofi, and Takeda; and participating on a Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for Candel Therapeutics. Dr. Patil reports receiving research funding from 10.13039/100004755EMD Serono, 10.13039/100005565Janssen, and 10.13039/100005564Gilead; receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Biocept, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bicara, Caris, Daiichi, Guardant Health, Guidepoint, EMD Serono, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Mirati Therapeutics, Natera, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda; and participating on the Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for Elevation Oncology. Dr. Weiss reports receiving institutional grants from AstraZeneca, 10.13039/100019799G1, Loxo/10.13039/100019518Lilly, Mirati, SDP, BI, and PDS; receiving consulting fees from AZD, EMD Serono, Genentech, G1, Jounce, AbbVie, Nanobiotix, Merck, Sanofi, Gilead, PDS, and AMGEN; participating on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Jounce and Beigene; having a leadership or fiduciary role for Cancergrace; and having stock/stock options for Nektar, Vesselon, Achilles, Nuvalent, Lyell, En Fuego, and Vertex. Dr. Dowell reports receiving consulting fees from Takeda, Catalyst, Beigene, and Janssen. Dr. Villaruz reports receiving consulting fees from Sanofi, Gilead, Johnson & Johnson, EMD Serono, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, and Janssen. Dr. Cass reports receiving honoraria from OncLive, Medscape, and PharmacyTimes; and participating on the Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for G1 Therapeutics, Takeda, and Regeneron. Dr. Iams reports receiving consulting fees from OncLive, Clinical Care Options, Chardan, Cello Health, and Curio Science; and participating on the Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for Genentech, Mirati, Outcomes Insights, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, G1 Therapeutics, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Janssen, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and NovoCure. Dr. Aisner reports receiving consulting fees from Merus, Genentech, Bayer, AbbVie, and AstraZeneca; receiving support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca; and serving as Chair of Board for Genomics Organization for Academic Laboratories. Dr. Aggarwal reportsreceiving consulting fees from Genentech, Lilly, Merck, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi/Regeneron, Pfizer, Janssen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Takeda, Arcus Biosciences, Mirati Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Novocure, AbbVie, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; receiving speaking fees from AstraZeneca and Roche/Genentech; and receiving research funding from 10.13039/100004334Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca/10.13039/501100004628MedImmune, 10.13039/501100022274Daiichi Sankyo, Loxo@Lilly, and Candel Therapeutics. Dr. Camidge reports receiving honoraria for consulting from AbbVie, Anheart, Beigene, Eli Lilly, Immunocore, Janssen, Prelude, Seattle Genetics, Valence, Appolomics, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Dizal, EMD Serono, Elevation, Hengrui, Hummingbird, Medtronic, Mersana, Mirati, Nalo Therapeutics, Onkure, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, Theseus, and Xcovery. Dr. Marmarelis reports receiving research funding from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Merck; receiving consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novocure, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Takeda, Blueprint Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ikena, and Regeneron; receiving honoraria from Thermo Fisher; and having stock in Merck and Johnson & Johnson. Dr. Sun reports receiving honoraria from Bayer and participating on the Data Safety Monitoring Board/Advisory Board for Seagen, Sanofi Genzyme, and Regeneron. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Crown Copyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the AGA Institute.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common adverse event of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesize that genetic susceptibility to Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) predisposes to IMC. In this study, we first develop a polygenic risk scores for CD (PRS CD ) and UC (PRS UC ) in cancer-free individuals and then test these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1316 patients with ICI-treated non-small cell lung cancer and perform a replication in 873 ICI-treated pan-cancer patients. In a meta-analysis, the PRS UC predicts all-grade IMC (OR meta =1.35 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI = 1.12-1.64, P = 2×10 -03 ) and severe IMC (OR meta =1.49 per SD, 95% CI = 1.18-1.88, P = 9×10 -04 ). PRS CD is not associated with IMC. Furthermore, PRS UC predicts severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (OR meta =2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07-4.53, P = 0.03). Overall, PRS UC can identify patients receiving ICI at risk of developing IMC and may be useful to monitor patients and improve patient outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Although the associations between genetic variations and lung cancer risk have been explored, the epigenetic consequences of DNA methylation in lung cancer development are largely unknown. Here, the genetically predicted DNA methylation markers associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) risk by a two-stage case-control design were investigated., Methods: The genetic prediction models for methylation levels based on genetic and methylation data of 1595 subjects from the Framingham Heart Study were established. The prediction models were applied to a fixed-effect meta-analysis of screening data sets with 27,120 NSCLC cases and 27,355 controls to identify the methylation markers, which were then replicated in independent data sets with 7844 lung cancer cases and 421,224 controls. Also performed was a multi-omics functional annotation for the identified CpGs by integrating genomics, epigenomics, and transcriptomics and investigation of the potential regulation pathways., Results: Of the 29,894 CpG sites passing the quality control, 39 CpGs associated with NSCLC risk (Bonferroni-corrected p ≤ 1.67 × 10 -6 ) were originally identified. Of these, 16 CpGs remained significant in the validation stage (Bonferroni-corrected p ≤ 1.28 × 10 -3 ), including four novel CpGs. Multi-omics functional annotation showed nine of 16 CpGs were potentially functional biomarkers for NSCLC risk. Thirty-five genes within a 1-Mb window of 12 CpGs that might be involved in regulatory pathways of NSCLC risk were identified., Conclusions: Sixteen promising DNA methylation markers associated with NSCLC were identified. Changes of the methylation level at these CpGs might influence the development of NSCLC by regulating the expression of genes nearby., Plain Language Summary: The epigenetic consequences of DNA methylation in lung cancer development are still largely unknown. This study used summary data of large-scale genome-wide association studies to investigate the associations between genetically predicted levels of methylation biomarkers and non-small cell lung cancer risk at the first time. This study looked at how well larotrectinib worked in adult patients with sarcomas caused by TRK fusion proteins. These findings will provide a unique insight into the epigenetic susceptibility mechanisms of lung cancer., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

Background: Low-dose CT screening can reduce lung cancer-related mortality. However, most screen-detected pulmonary abnormalities do not develop into cancer and it often remains challenging to identify malignant nodules, particularly among indeterminate nodules. We aimed to develop and assess prediction models based on radiological features to discriminate between benign and malignant pulmonary lesions detected on a baseline screen., Methods: Using four international lung cancer screening studies, we extracted 2060 radiomic features for each of 16 797 nodules (513 malignant) among 6865 participants. After filtering out low-quality radiomic features, 642 radiomic and 9 epidemiological features remained for model development. We used cross-validation and grid search to assess three machine learning (ML) models (eXtreme Gradient Boosted Trees, random forest, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)) for their ability to accurately predict risk of malignancy for pulmonary nodules. We report model performance based on the area under the curve (AUC) and calibration metrics in the held-out test set., Results: The LASSO model yielded the best predictive performance in cross-validation and was fit in the full training set based on optimised hyperparameters. Our radiomics model had a test-set AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.96) and outperformed the established Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer model (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.89) for nodule assessment. Our model performed well among both solid (AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) and subsolid nodules (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.95)., Conclusions: We developed highly accurate ML models based on radiomic and epidemiological features from four international lung cancer screening studies that may be suitable for assessing indeterminate screen-detected pulmonary nodules for risk of malignancy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Clinical, molecular, and genetic epidemiology studies displayed remarkable differences between ever- and never-smoking lung cancer., Methods: We conducted a stratified multi-population (European, East Asian, and African descent) association study on 44,823 ever-smokers and 20,074 never-smokers to identify novel variants that were missed in the non-stratified analysis. Functional analysis including expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) colocalization and DNA damage assays, and annotation studies were conducted to evaluate the functional roles of the variants. We further evaluated the impact of smoking quantity on lung cancer risk for the variants associated with ever-smoking lung cancer., Results: Five novel independent loci, GABRA4, intergenic region 12q24.33, LRRC4C, LINC01088, and LCNL1 were identified with the association at two or three populations (P < 5 × 10-8). Further functional analysis provided multiple lines of evidence suggesting the variants affect lung cancer risk through excessive DNA damage (GABRA4) or cis-regulation of gene expression (LCNL1). The risk of variants from 12 independent regions, including the well-known CHRNA5, associated with ever-smoking lung cancer was evaluated for never-smokers, light-smokers (packyear ≤ 20), and moderate-to-heavy-smokers (packyear > 20). Different risk patterns were observed for the variants among the different groups by smoking behavior., Conclusions: We identified novel variants associated with lung cancer in only ever- or never-smoking groups that were missed by prior main-effect association studies., Impact: Our study highlights the genetic heterogeneity between ever- and never-smoking lung cancer and provides etiologic insights into the complicated genetic architecture of this deadly cancer., (©2024 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Cigarette smoke, containing both nicotine and carcinogens, causes lung cancer. However, not all smokers develop lung cancer, highlighting the importance of the interaction between host susceptibility and environmental exposure in tumorigenesis. Here, we aimed to delineate the interaction between metabolizing ability of tobacco carcinogens and smoking intensity in mediating genetic susceptibility to smoking-related lung tumorigenesis. Single-variant and gene-based associations of 43 tobacco carcinogen-metabolizing genes with lung cancer were analyzed using summary statistics and individual-level genetic data, followed by causal inference of Mendelian randomization, mediation analysis, and structural equation modeling. Cigarette smoke-exposed cell models were used to detect gene expression patterns in relation to specific alleles. Data from the International Lung Cancer Consortium (29,266 cases and 56,450 controls) and UK Biobank (2,155 cases and 376,329 controls) indicated that the genetic variant rs56113850 C>T located in intron 4 of CYP2A6 was significantly associated with decreased lung cancer risk among smokers (OR = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.85-0.91, P = 2.18 × 10-16), which might interact (Pinteraction = 0.028) with and partially be mediated (ORindirect = 0.987) by smoking status. Smoking intensity accounted for 82.3% of the effect of CYP2A6 activity on lung cancer risk but entirely mediated the genetic effect of rs56113850. Mechanistically, the rs56113850 T allele rescued the downregulation of CYP2A6 caused by cigarette smoke exposure, potentially through preferential recruitment of transcription factor helicase-like transcription factor. Together, this study provides additional insights into the interplay between host susceptibility and carcinogen exposure in smoking-related lung tumorigenesis., Significance: The causal pathway connecting CYP2A6 genetic variability and activity, cigarette consumption, and lung cancer susceptibility in smokers highlights the need for behavior modification interventions based on host susceptibility for cancer prevention., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Although polygenic risk score (PRS) has emerged as a promising tool for predicting cancer risk from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the individual-level accuracy of lung cancer PRS and the extent to which its impact on subsequent clinical applications remains largely unexplored., Methods: Lung cancer PRSs and confidence/credible interval (CI) were constructed using two statistical approaches for each individual: (1) the weighted sum of 16 GWAS-derived significant SNP loci and the CI through the bootstrapping method (PRS-16-CV) and (2) LDpred2 and the CI through posteriors sampling (PRS-Bayes), among 17,166 lung cancer cases and 12,894 controls with European ancestry from the International Lung Cancer Consortium. Individuals were classified into different genetic risk subgroups based on the relationship between their own PRS mean/PRS CI and the population level threshold., Results: Considerable variances in PRS point estimates at the individual level were observed for both methods, with an average standard deviation (s.d.) of 0.12 for PRS-16-CV and a much larger s.d. of 0.88 for PRS-Bayes. Using PRS-16-CV, only 25.0% of individuals with PRS point estimates in the lowest decile of PRS and 16.8% in the highest decile have their entire 95% CI fully contained in the lowest and highest decile, respectively, while PRS-Bayes was unable to find any eligible individuals. Only 19% of the individuals were concordantly identified as having high genetic risk (> 90th percentile) using the two PRS estimators. An increased relative risk of lung cancer comparing the highest PRS percentile to the lowest was observed when taking the CI into account (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 2.12-3.50, P-value = 4.13 × 10 -15 ) compared to using PRS-16-CV mean (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.99-2.49, P-value = 5.70 × 10 -46 ). Improved risk prediction performance with higher AUC was consistently observed in individuals identified by PRS-16-CV CI, and the best performance was achieved by incorporating age, gender, and detailed smoking pack-years (AUC: 0.73, 95% CI = 0.72-0.74)., Conclusions: Lung cancer PRS estimates using different methods have modest correlations at the individual level, highlighting the importance of considering individual-level uncertainty when evaluating the practical utility of PRS., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

A growing proportion of head and neck cancer (HNC), especially oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV). There are several markers for HPV-driven HNC, one being HPV early antigen serology. We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of HPV serology and its performance across patient characteristics. Data from the VOYAGER consortium was used, which comprises five studies on HNC from North America and Europe. Diagnostic accuracy, that is, sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's kappa and correctly classified proportions of HPV16 E6 serology, was assessed for OPC and other HNC using p16 INK4a immunohistochemistry (p16), HPV in situ hybridization (ISH) and HPV PCR as reference methods. Stratified analyses were performed for variables including age, sex, smoking and alcohol use, to test the robustness of diagnostic accuracy. A risk-factor analysis based on serology was conducted, comparing HPV-driven to non-HPV-driven OPC. Overall, HPV serology had a sensitivity of 86.8% (95% CI 85.1-88.3) and specificity of 91.2% (95% CI 88.6-93.4) for HPV-driven OPC using p16 as a reference method. In stratified analyses, diagnostic accuracy remained consistent across sex and different age groups. Sensitivity was lower for heavy smokers (77.7%), OPC without lymph node involvement (74.4%) and the ARCAGE study (66.7%), while specificity decreased for cases with <10 pack-years (72.1%). The risk-factor model included study, year of diagnosis, age, sex, BMI, alcohol use, pack-years, TNM-T and TNM-N stage. HPV serology is a robust biomarker for HPV-driven OPC, and its diagnostic accuracy is independent of age and sex. Future research is suggested on the influence of smoking on HPV antibody levels., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)

Background: Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is a standard treatment for many patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), an etiologically distinct subset of head and neck cancer. Although associated with good long-term survival, clinical risk factors for ototoxicity have been understudied in this population. This study aimed to evaluate clinical predictors associated with ototoxicity in HPV-positive OPSCC patients treated with cisplatin chemoradiation., Methods: This retrospective case-control study included 201 adult patients (>18 years) with histologically confirmed HPV-positive OPSCC who received cisplatin chemoradiation as their primary treatment from 2001 and 2019 at a single tertiary cancer center. Ototoxicity was determined using baseline and follow-up audiometry and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 grading criteria (Grade ≥2). Multivariable logistic regression [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)] identified significant predictors that increased the odds of ototoxicity., Results: A total of 201 patients [165 males; median (IQR) age, 57 (11) years] were included in the study. The incidence of ototoxicity in the worst ear was 56.2%, with the greatest hearing loss occurring at high frequencies (4-8 kHz), resulting in a loss of 12.5 dB at 4 to 6 kHz and 20 dB at 6 to 8 kHz. High-dose cisplatin administration compared to weekly administration [aOR 4.93 (95% CI: 1.84-14.99), P  = .003], a higher mean cochlear radiation dose [aOR 1.58 (95% CI: 1.12-2.30), P  = .01], smoking history [aOR 2.89 (95% CI: 1.51-5.63), P  = .001], and a 10 year increase in age [aOR 2.07 (95% CI: 1.25-3.52), P  = .006] were each independently associated with increased odds of ototoxicity., Conclusions: Clinical predictors of ototoxicity in HPV-positive OPSCC patients treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiation include the use of a high-dose cisplatin regimen, higher cochlear radiation doses, a history of smoking, and older age. With the rising incidence of this malignancy in Western countries and overall improved survivorship, our research motivates future studies into risk stratification and earlier interventions to mitigate and reduce the risk of ototoxicity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Immense attention has been given to the outcome of COVID-19 infection. However, comprehensive studies based on large populational cohort with long-term follow-up are still lacking. This study aimed to investigate the risk of various short-term comorbidities (within one month) and long-term sequelae (above one month) after COVID-19 infection., Methods: In this large prospective cohort study with 14 months follow-up information based on UK biobank, we included 16,776 COVID-19-positive participants and 58,281 COVID-19-negative participants matched for comparison. The risk of each comorbidity and sequela was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression analysis and presented as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI)., Results: COVID-19-positive individuals had a higher risk of 47 types of comorbidities within one month following COVID-19 infection, especially those who were older, male, overweight/obese, ever-smoked, with more pre-existing comorbidities and hospitalized. About 70.37% of COVID-19 patients with comorbidities had more than one co-occurring comorbidities. Additionally, only 6 high-risk sequelae were observed after one month of COVID-19 infection, and the incidence was relatively low (< 1%)., Conclusion: In addition to long-term sequelae following COVID-19 infection, plenty of comorbidities were observed, especially in patients with older age, male gender, overweight/obese, more pre-existing comorbidities and severe COVID-19, indicating that more attention should be given to these susceptible persons within this period., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Cetuximab is a standard of care therapy for patients with RAS wild-type (WT) advanced colorectal cancer. Limited data suggest a wide variation in cetuximab plasma concentrations after standard dosing regimens. We correlated cetuximab plasma concentrations with survival and toxicity., Methods: The CO. 20 study randomized patients with RAS WT advanced colorectal cancer in a 1:1 ratio to cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 intravenously followed by weekly maintenance of 250 mg/m 2 , plus brivanib 800 mg orally daily or placebo. Blood samples obtained at week 5 precetuximab treatment were analyzed by ELISA. Patients were grouped into tertiles based on plasma cetuximab concentrations. Cetuximab concentration tertiles were correlated with survival outcomes and toxicity. Patient demographic and biochemical parameters were evaluated as co-variables., Results: Week 5 plasma cetuximab concentrations were available for 591 patients (78.8%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.4 months and 7.8 months for patients in the highest (T3) and lowest tertiles (T1) respectively. On multivariable analysis, plasma cetuximab concentration was associated with OS (HR 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.83, P < .001, T3 vs. T1), and a trend towards progression-free survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.02, P = .07, T3 vs. T1). There was no association between cetuximab concentration and skin toxicity or diarrhea., Conclusion: The standard cetuximab dosing regimen may not be optimal for all patients. Further pharmacokinetic studies are needed to optimize cetuximab dosing given the potential improvement in OS., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors declare no potential conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With increasing reliance on technology in oncology, the impact of digital clinical decision support (CDS) tools needs to be examined. A systematic review update was conducted and peer-reviewed literature from 2016 to 2022 were included if CDS tools were used for live decision making and comparatively assessed quantitative outcomes. 3369 studies were screened and 19 were included in this updated review. Combined with a previous review of 24 studies, a total of 43 studies were analyzed. Improvements in outcomes were observed in 42 studies, and 34 of these were of statistical significance. Computerized physician order entry and clinical practice guideline systems comprise the greatest number of evaluated CDS tools (13 and 10 respectively), followed by those that utilize patient-reported outcomes (8), clinical pathway systems (8) and prescriber alerts for best-practice advisories (4). Our review indicates that CDS can improve guideline adherence, patient-centered care, and care delivery processes in oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This open-label, phase 3 trial (ALTA-3; NCT03596866) compared efficacy and safety of brigatinib versus alectinib for ALK+ NSCLC after disease progression on crizotinib., Methods: Patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC that progressed on crizotinib were randomized 1:1 to brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in, 90 mg) or alectinib 600 mg twice daily, aiming to test superiority. The primary end point was blinded independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Interim analysis for efficacy and futility was planned at approximately 70% of 164 expected PFS events., Results: The population (N = 248; brigatinib, n = 125; alectinib, n = 123) was notable for long median duration of prior crizotinib (16.0-16.8 mo) and low rate of ALK fusion in baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA; 78 of 232 [34%]). Median blinded independent review committee-assessed PFS was 19.3 months with brigatinib and 19.2 months with alectinib (hazard ratio = 0.97 [95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.42], p = 0.8672]). The study met futility criterion. Overall survival was immature (41 events [17%]). Exploratory analyses pooled across the treatment groups revealed median PFS of 11.1 versus 22.5 months in patients with versus without ctDNA-detectable ALK fusion at baseline (hazard ratio: 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.71]). Treatment-related adverse events in more than 30% of patients (brigatinib, alectinib) were elevated levels of blood creatine phosphokinase (70%, 29%), aspartate aminotransferase (53%, 38%), and alanine aminotransferase (40%, 36%)., Conclusions: Brigatinib was not superior to alectinib for PFS in crizotinib-pretreated ALK+ NSCLC. Safety was consistent with the well-established and unique profiles of each drug. The low proportion of patients with ctDNA-detectable ALK fusion may account for prolonged PFS with both drugs in ALTA-3., (Copyright © 2023 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Liquid biopsy is recommended to diagnose molecular resistance to targeted therapy in patients with lung cancer. Nevertheless, not all jurisdictions provide funding and patient access. We report patients' perceived value of liquid biopsy in targeted therapy resistance., Methods: Canadian patients participating in a national EGFR T790M liquid biopsy validation study completed structured interviews measuring perceived value and willingness-to-pay for plasma circulating tumor DNA testing as an alternative to tumor biopsy using open-ended and iterative bidding approaches., Results: A total of 60 patients with advanced lung cancer participated with a median age of 64 years (range: 31-87 y); 69% were Asian and 45% female. All had received prior EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor; 17% also received chemotherapy. All patients preferred to have plasma testing over repeat tumor biopsy. In the context of the Canadian publicly funded system, patients estimated that a median of 300 (interquartile range: 150-800) Canadian dollars was a reasonable price to pay for liquid biopsy. Patients were personally willing to pay a median 100 (interquartile range: 33-350) Canadian dollars., Conclusions: In a system that covers the cost of standard diagnostic tests, patients with lung cancer indicated high willingness-to-pay out-of-pocket for liquid biopsy in the setting of acquired targeted therapy resistance. Patients have high perceived value of plasma genotyping and prefer it to repeat tumor biopsy., (© 2024 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.)

Background: This study was designed to identify common genetic susceptibility and shared genetic variants associated with acute radiation-induced toxicity across 4 cancer types (prostate, head and neck, breast, and lung)., Methods: A genome-wide association study meta-analysis was performed using 19 cohorts totaling 12 042 patients. Acute standardized total average toxicity (STATacute) was modelled using a generalized linear regression model for additive effect of genetic variants, adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates (rSTATacute). Linkage disequilibrium score regression estimated shared single-nucleotide variation (SNV-formerly SNP)-based heritability of rSTATacute in all patients and for each cancer type., Results: Shared SNV-based heritability of STATacute among all cancer types was estimated at 10% (SE = 0.02) and was higher for prostate (17%, SE = 0.07), head and neck (27%, SE = 0.09), and breast (16%, SE = 0.09) cancers. We identified 130 suggestive associated SNVs with rSTATacute (5.0 × 10‒8 < P < 1.0 × 10‒5) across 25 genomic regions. rs142667902 showed the strongest association (effect allele A; effect size ‒0.17; P = 1.7 × 10‒7), which is located near DPPA4, encoding a protein involved in pluripotency in stem cells, which are essential for repair of radiation-induced tissue injury. Gene-set enrichment analysis identified 'RNA splicing via endonucleolytic cleavage and ligation' (P = 5.1 × 10‒6, P = .079 corrected) as the top gene set associated with rSTATacute among all patients. In silico gene expression analysis showed that the genes associated with rSTATacute were statistically significantly up-regulated in skin (not sun exposed P = .004 corrected; sun exposed P = .026 corrected)., Conclusions: There is shared SNV-based heritability for acute radiation-induced toxicity across and within individual cancer sites. Future meta-genome-wide association studies among large radiation therapy patient cohorts are worthwhile to identify the common causal variants for acute radiotoxicity across cancer types., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is influenced by both tumor and patient specific factors. Current therapies of advanced HCC target angiogenesis and immune evasion, however there are no clinically useful biomarkers to guide clinicians., Methods: Our aim in this retrospective cohort study was to validate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) prognostic of outcome in advanced HCC from the literature, and to analyze exploratory SNPs chosen from evaluation of the HCC tumor immune microenvironment. Using a database of patients with HCC treated with sorafenib, blood samples were genotyped, clinical variables were retrospectively collected, and SNPs were analyzed for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A subsequent analysis was conducted to determine if identified SNPs were prognostic in trans arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treated patients., Results: Literature review identified 7 SNPs in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), eNOS, angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), however none were externally validated in our dataset. Of the 35 exploratory immunomodulatory SNPs, the following were associated with PFS or OS: CCL2 C-C motif ligand 2 (CCL2) (rs1024611), interleukin-10 ( IL-10 ) (rs1800896), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 ( CTLA-4 ) (rs231775) and NFKB1 (rs28362491)., Conclusions: SNPs identified by literature review to be prognostic in sorafenib treated patients with advanced HCC were not validated in our dataset. Our findings suggest potentially important prognostic implications of SNPs in VEGFR2, CCL2, IL-10, CTLA-4 and NFKB1 that deserve further study., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tgh.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tgh-23-22/coif). BHL reports grants, honoraria, and meeting support from Astrazeneca, and grants from Pfizer. DC reports grants, honoraria, or advisory board support from NCI, CIHR, CCSRI, Astrazeneca, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, AMGEN, EMD Serono, Pfizer, Jazz, Merck, Abvie, Anheart, Roche, BMS, and Novartis. GL reports grants, honoraria, or advisory board support from NCI, CIHR, CCSRI, Astrazeneca, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, AMGEN, EMD Serono, Pfizer, Jazz, Merck, Abvie, Anheart, Roche, BMS, and Novartis. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology. All rights reserved.)

Brain metastases are especially common in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with a cumulative incidence of over 50% and associated with a poor prognosis, high symptom burden, and decreased quality of life. Lorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which has a high potency against resistance mutations seen with earlier generation ALK TKIs. In 2018, lorlatinib was granted accelerated approval in second- and third-line treatment for use in patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC on the basis of phase 1/2 study results. This initial approval was expanded for first-line treatment of patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC on the basis of the interim analysis of the phase 3 CROWN study showing longer progression-free survival, time to intracranial progression, duration of response, and objective response rate compared with crizotinib. This manuscript is a transcript of our podcast, in which we discuss the clinical significance of controlling the onset of brain metastases, considerations in selecting a first-line therapy option, efficacy and safety observed in patients with and without brain metastases, and rationales for using lorlatinib upfront versus reserving for a later line in therapy., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Common genetic variants associated with lung cancer have been well studied in the past decade. However, only 12.3% heritability has been explained by these variants. In this study, we investigate the contribution of rare variants (RVs) (minor allele frequency <0.01) to lung cancer through two large whole exome sequencing case-control studies. We first performed gene-based association tests using a novel Bayes Factor statistic in the International Lung Cancer Consortium, the discovery study (European, 1042 cases vs. 881 controls). The top genes identified are further assessed in the UK Biobank (European, 630 cases vs. 172 864 controls), the replication study. After controlling for the false discovery rate, we found two genes, CTSL and APOE, significantly associated with lung cancer in both studies. Single variant tests in UK Biobank identified 4 RVs (3 missense variants) in CTSL and 2 RVs (1 missense variant) in APOE stongly associated with lung cancer (OR between 2.0 and 139.0). The role of these genetic variants in the regulation of CTSL or APOE expression remains unclear. If such a role is established, this could have important therapeutic implications for lung cancer patients., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Although lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is rolling out in many areas of the world, differentiating indeterminate pulmonary nodules remains a major challenge. We conducted one of the first systematic investigations of circulating protein markers to differentiate malignant from benign screen-detected pulmonary nodules., Methods: Based on 4 international low-dose computed tomography screening studies, we assayed 1078 protein markers using prediagnostic blood samples from 1253 participants based on a nested case-control design. Protein markers were measured using proximity extension assays, and data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, random forest, and penalized regressions. Protein burden scores (PBSs) for overall nodule malignancy and imminent tumors were estimated., Results: We identified 36 potentially informative circulating protein markers differentiating malignant from benign nodules, representing a tightly connected biological network. Ten markers were found to be particularly relevant for imminent lung cancer diagnoses within 1 year. Increases in PBSs for overall nodule malignancy and imminent tumors by 1 standard deviation were associated with odds ratios of 2.29 (95% confidence interval: 1.95 to 2.72) and 2.81 (95% confidence interval: 2.27 to 3.54) for nodule malignancy overall and within 1 year of diagnosis, respectively. Both PBSs for overall nodule malignancy and for imminent tumors were substantially higher for those with malignant nodules than for those with benign nodules, even when limited to Lung Computed Tomography Screening Reporting and Data System (LungRADS) category 4 (P < .001)., Conclusions: Circulating protein markers can help differentiate malignant from benign pulmonary nodules. Validation with an independent computed tomographic screening study will be required before clinical implementation., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)