Search

Low-income Medicare beneficiaries rely on Medicaid for supplemental coverage but must meet income and asset tests to qualify. We examined states' income and asset tests for full-benefit Medicaid during the period 2006-18 and examined how alternative asset tests would affect eligibility for community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries ages sixty-five and older. Most states have not updated the dollar limit of Medicaid's asset test since 1989, making the asset test increasingly restrictive in inflation-adjusted terms. We estimated that increasing Medicaid's asset limit by the Consumer Price Index, to Medicare Savings Program levels, or to $10,000 for individuals and $20,000 for couples would increase Medicaid eligibility by 1.7 percent, 4.4 percent, and 7.5 percent, respectively. Simplifying Medicaid's asset test to focus only on certain high-value assets would increase eligibility by 20.5 percent. Increasing asset limits would lessen restrictions on Medicaid eligibility that arise from stagnant asset tests, broadening eligibility for certain low-income Medicare beneficiaries and allowing them to retain higher, yet still modest, savings.

Cost sharing in traditional Medicare can consume a substantial portion of the income of beneficiaries who do not have supplemental insurance from Medicaid, an employer, or a Medigap plan. Near-poor Medicare beneficiaries (with incomes more than 100 percent but less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level) are ineligible for Medicaid but frequently lack alternative supplemental coverage, resulting in a supplemental coverage "cliff" of 25.8 percentage points just above the eligibility threshold for Medicaid (100 percent of poverty). We estimated that beneficiaries affected by this supplemental coverage cliff incurred an additional $2,288 in out-of-pocket spending over the course of two years, used 55 percent fewer outpatient evaluation and management services per year, and filled fewer prescriptions. Lower prescription drug use was partly driven by low take-up of Part D subsidies, which Medicare beneficiaries automatically receive if they have Medicaid. Expanding eligibility for Medicaid supplemental coverage and increasing take-up of Part D subsidies would lessen cost-related barriers to health care among near-poor Medicare beneficiaries.

For some low-income Medicare beneficiaries, Medicaid provides financial protection against Medicare's out-of-pocket costs, but many Medicare beneficiaries who qualify for Medicaid are not continuously enrolled. We examined Medicaid disenrollment among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries and the relationship between disenrollment and state policies. In the period 2012-16, 18.2 percent of Medicare beneficiaries who received full or partial Medicaid disenrolled for reasons other than death. More than 50 percent of Medicare beneficiaries who remained without Medicaid one year after disenrolling continued to receive low-income subsidies for Medicare Part D coverage with eligibility requirements similar to those of Medicaid. Among Medicare beneficiaries with continuous Part D subsidies, the rate of Medicaid disenrollment was 24 percent lower in states that automatically enrolled recipients of the federal Supplemental Security Income program in full Medicaid, 33 percent lower in states with more generous provider payment policies, and 37 percent lower in states with less restrictive asset limits for partial Medicaid. Policies that make it easier for people to maintain Medicaid eligibility and that enhance access to care in Medicaid via higher provider reimbursements may reduce disenrollment.