1. Assessing usability of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in older people with and without a rare dermatologic disorder.
- Author
-
Ho CN, Kündig A, Bahadori L, Roat K, Bruce R, Goswami CP, Kelly K, and Moll T
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Female, Male, Aged, 80 and over, Qualitative Research, Computers, Handheld, France, United States, Interviews as Topic, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Smartphone
- Abstract
Background: Robust and well-defined data collection is important when using electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in clinical studies. Questions have been raised as to whether older age may be a barrier to data collection due to patients' unfamiliarity with electronic devices. Older adults may also have underlying health conditions that affect their ability to fill out patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on electronic devices. The aim of this observational, qualitative research study was to evaluate the usability of electronic PROMs (ePROMs) on a tablet and smartphone in older participants with and without bullous pemphigoid (BP)., Methods: Older people with and without BP were recruited in the US and France. They participated in 60-min in-person interviews, with moderators observing their completion of various tasks, including ePROMs, using a tablet and smartphone. Participants were scored on ease of task completion using a scale from 1 to 5., Results: A total of 12 participants were recruited (≥65 years old; six each with and without BP [all participants without BP were ≥75 years old]). Most participants (83%) could easily and confidently perform most assigned tasks on both the tablet and smartphone. Although select tasks required assistance, all participants were eventually able to complete all tasks. Overall, ePROM usability did not correlate with age, sex, country, or disease state. Feedback on the general usability of both electronic devices was largely positive, and most participants (n = 11; 92%) were willing to use them. Participants were generally pleased with the training modules offered on both devices, describing the training as sufficient, straightforward, and helpful. In total, 25 usability issues were identified, which fell into three categories: incomplete instructions, unclear language, and insufficient technical/visual design. Participants provided feedback on how to enhance device usability., Conclusions: The results suggest that older people can confidently use a tablet or smartphone for ePROM completion, particularly with appropriate training. ePROMs should be designed with the needs of the target patient population in mind. These results can be leveraged to improve clinical data recording, optimize device usability, and enhance the user experience for older people and those with functional or physical limitations., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent with Good Clinical Practice and applicable regulatory requirements. Independent institutional review for this study was provided by WCG (WIRB-Copernicus Group) IRB (Tracking Number: 20230164), and all participants consented to participate in this research via signed informed consent. Consent for publication: No patient-identifiable data have been presented. Informed consent stipulated that if the results of this study are published, no patient will be identified. Competing interests: CNH, LB, and AK are employees of AstraZeneca and may own stock/stock options. KR, KK, RB, and CPG are employees of IQVIA, which received funding from AstraZeneca to conduct this study. TM is an employee of Clario, which received funding from AstraZeneca to (1) create the electronic build for the study and (2) supply the devices., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF