Search

Purpose: Efficacy of MEK inhibitors in KRAS+ NSCLC may differ based on specific KRAS mutations and comutations. Our hypothesis was that docetaxel and trametinib would improve activity in KRAS+ NSCLC and specifically in KRAS G12C NSCLC., Patients and Methods: S1507 is a single-arm phase II study assessing the response rate (RR) with docetaxel plus trametinib in recurrent KRAS+ NSCLC and secondarily in the G12C subset. The accrual goal was 45 eligible patients, with at least 25 with G12C mutation. The design was two-stage design to rule out a 17% RR, within the overall population at the one-sided 3% level and within the G12C subset at the 5% level., Results: Between July 18, 2016, and March 15, 2018, 60 patients were enrolled with 53 eligible and 18 eligible in the G12C cohort. The RR was 34% [95% confidence interval (CI), 22-48] overall and 28% (95% CI, 10-53) in G12C. Median PFS and OS were 4.1 and 3.3 months and 10.9 and 8.8 months, overall and in the subset, respectively. Common toxicities were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, rash, anemia, mucositis, and neutropenia. Among 26 patients with known status for TP53 (10+ve) and STK11 (5+ve), OS (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.16-7.01), and RR (0% vs. 56%, P = 0.004) were worse in patients with TP53 mutated versus wild-type cancers., Conclusions: RRs were significantly improved in the overall population. Contrary to preclinical studies, the combination showed no improvement in efficacy in G12C patients. Comutations may influence therapeutic efficacy of KRAS directed therapies and are worthy of further evaluation. See related commentary by Cantor and Aggarwal, p. 3563., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Combination programmed cell death protein 1/cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4-blockade and dual BRAF/MEK inhibition have each shown significant clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600 -mutant metastatic melanoma, leading to broad regulatory approval. Little prospective data exist to guide the choice of either initial therapy or treatment sequence in this population. This study was conducted to determine which initial treatment or treatment sequence produced the best efficacy., Patients and Methods: In a phase III trial, patients with treatment-naive BRAFV600 -mutant metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive either combination nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm A) or dabrafenib/trametinib (arm B) in step 1, and at disease progression were enrolled in step 2 to receive the alternate therapy, dabrafenib/trametinib (arm C) or nivolumab/ipilimumab (arm D). The primary end point was 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were 3-year OS, objective response rate, response duration, progression-free survival, crossover feasibility, and safety., Results: A total of 265 patients were enrolled, with 73 going onto step 2 (27 in arm C and 46 in arm D). The study was stopped early by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of a clinically significant end point being achieved. The 2-year OS for those starting on arm A was 71.8% (95% CI, 62.5 to 79.1) and arm B 51.5% (95% CI, 41.7 to 60.4; log-rank P = .010). Step 1 progression-free survival favored arm A ( P = .054). Objective response rates were arm A: 46.0%; arm B: 43.0%; arm C: 47.8%; and arm D: 29.6%. Median duration of response was not reached for arm A and 12.7 months for arm B ( P < .001). Crossover occurred in 52% of patients with documented disease progression. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred with similar frequency between arms, and regimen toxicity profiles were as anticipated., Conclusion: Combination nivolumab/ipilimumab followed by BRAF and MEK inhibitor therapy, if necessary, should be the preferred treatment sequence for a large majority of patients.

Purpose: Interferon-α favors a Th1 shift in immunity, and combining with ipilimumab (ipi) at 3 or 10 mg/kg may downregulate CTLA4-mediated suppressive effects, leading to more durable antitumor immune responses. A study of tremelimumab and high-dose interferon-α (HDI) showed promising efficacy, supporting this hypothesis., Patients and Methods: E3611 followed a 2-by-2 factorial design (A: ipi10+HDI; B: ipi10; C: ipi3+HDI; D: ipi3) to evaluate (i) no HDI versus HDI (across ipilimumab doses) and (ii) ipi3 versus ipi10 (across HDI status). We hypothesized that median progression-free survival (PFS) would improve from 3 to 6 months with HDI versus no HDI and with ipi10 versus ipi3., Results: For eligible and treated patients ( N = 81) at a median follow-up time of 29.8 months, median PFS was 4.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7-8.2] when ipilimumab was used alone and 7.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-11.0) when HDI was added. Median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.6-7.5) with 3 mg/kg ipilimumab and 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-13.5) with 10 mg/kg. By study arm, median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-20.2) in arm A, 6.2 months (95% CI, 2.7-25.7) in B, 5.7 months (95% CI, 1.5-11.1) in C, and 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.7) in D. The differences in PFS and overall survival (OS) did not reach statistical significance. Adverse events were consistent with the known profiles of ipilimumab and HDI and significantly higher with HDI and ipi10., Conclusions: Although PFS was increased, the differences resulting from adding interferon-α or a higher dose of ipilimumab did not reach statistical significance and do not outweigh the added toxicity risks., (©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Conventional treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) yields modest responses and short remissions. We report 30 hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) for MCL: 13 autologous, 10 allogeneic myeloablative, and 7 nonablative. After a median 1.2 years from diagnosis (range 0.5 to 4.7) and a median of 2 pre-HSCT chemotherapeutic regimens (range 1 to 5), their median age at HSCT was 52 years (range 37 to 67). Eleven patients (41%) were in first remission, 11 (41%) were in second remission, and 7 (25%) had resistant disease. Four died early. Nineteen achieved CR (83%) and 4 PR (17%). With median 2.7 years of follow-up, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 42% (95% CI 11-73%) after autologous versus allogeneic at 49% (95% CI 22-76%). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 31% (95% CI 3-59%) and 50% (95% CI 24-76%) for autologous and allogeneic HSCT, respectively. Fourteen died: 3 from sepsis, 1 acute GVHD, 10 MCL. No autologous transplant-related deaths occurred. Allogeneic transplant-related mortality was 29% (95% CI 6-52%) at 1 and 5 years. HSCT for MCL can yield extended disease control and long-term survival.

Complications related to liver hemangioma are rare. We herein describe the case of a patient with three giant cavernous hemangiomas of the liver, of which two were resected for symptoms. A significant microangiopathic hemolytic anemia occurred in the early postoperative period, leading to acute renal failure and necessitating blood transfusions. The systematic evaluation of hemolytic processes in the postoperative patient is described. Surgeons should be aware of the potential for hemolytic complications after major surgery when giant hepatic hemangiomas are present.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) can result in a prolonged remission, although most patients eventually relapse and die of their disease. We report long-term outcomes of AHSCT for patients with relapsed low-grade NHL. Between May 1983 and 2001, 67 patients with relapsed or refractory stage III and IV low-grade NHL received an AHSCT at the University of Minnesota at a median of 2.3 years (range, 0.4-15.2 years) after diagnosis. At transplantation, 62 patients (92%) were in complete remission (CR) (6%) or partial remission (PR) (86%); 5 (8%) had resistant disease; and 9 (14%) had transformed to a higher-grade NHL. After AHSCT, 32 (49%) of 65 evaluable patients achieved CR, and 26 (40%) achieved PR. Overall survival (OS) was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38%-62%) at 4 years and 33% (95% CI, 20%-46%) at both 10 and 18 years, whereas progression-free survival (PFS) was 28% (95% CI, 17%-39%) at 4 years, 18% (95% CI, 8%-28%) at 10 years, and 14% (95% CI, 4%-25%) at 18 years. Transplant-related mortality in the first 100 days was 3% (95% CI, 0%-7%). Relapse occurred in 62% (95% CI, 48%-75%) at 4 years and 72% (95% CI, 56%-87%) at 10 years. Eleven patients (16%) developed myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia 1 to 8 years after AHSCT, and 3 (5%) developed solid tumors. In multiple regression analysis, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) score at transplantation was the most significant predictor for both OS and PFS. The median OS has not been reached in patients with an IPI score of 0 or 1 at transplantation (20 of 35 survive 2 to 18 years after AHSCT), whereas it was 2.3 and 1.6 years for IPI scores of 2 and 3, respectively ( P = .002). A good response (CR/PR) to AHSCT (relative risk [RR], 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9; P = .04) and age <50 years (RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; P = .01) were also independently significant predictors of good OS and PFS. We present mature follow-up data (median follow-up, 8 years; range, 2-18 years) of patients undergoing AHSCT for relapsed low-grade NHL and demonstrate extended OS and PFS. Very long-term remissions were seen in nearly 20% of patients. AHSCT remains promising, especially for patients with sensitive relapse and lower IPI scores. Recurrent lymphoma after AHSCT remains the major problem, and prolonged survival is further tempered by a significant risk of post-transplantation second malignancies, including myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia and solid tumors.