Search

Objectives: To examine the impact of fascia iliaca (FI) blocks performed in the emergency department on femoral shaft and distal femur fracture patients on opioid consumption, length of stay (LOS), and readmission rate., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Community-based Level 1 trauma center., Patient Selection Criteria: Patients with isolated low-energy femoral shaft or distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 32 and 33) presenting from January 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022, were included., Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Opioid consumption, LOS, discharge disposition, and 30-day readmission rate were compared between patients undergoing FI compartment block and not receiving the block., Results: One hundred thirty-six patients were included. Twenty-four received FI block. Both cohorts were primarily female gender (66.7% and 66.9%, respectively, for the FI block and the no FI block cohort). Most of the FI block cohort had femoral shaft fractures (62.5%), whereas the no FI block cohort had mostly distal femur fractures (56.2%). The mean body mass index, fracture type, and surgical procedure were similar between patients undergoing FI block and not receiving FI block. The FI block group had significantly lower opioid consumption preoperatively [36.1 vs. 55.3 morphine milliequivalents (MMEs), P = 0.030], postoperatively (71.7 vs. 130.6 MMEs, P = 0.041), and over total hospital stay (107.9 vs. 185.9 MMEs) including the mean opioid consumption per day of hospital stay (25.9 vs. 48.4 MMEs, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in LOS (4.9 vs. 5.0 days, P = 0.900), discharge disposition destination ( P = 0.200), or 30-day readmissions (12.5% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.148) between groups., Conclusions: Undergoing FI block in the emergency department was associated with decreased opioid consumption in patients with femoral shaft or distal femur fractures. There was no associated difference in LOS, discharge disposition, or 30-day readmissions., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: A robust body of literature supports the use of fascia iliaca compartment blocks (FICB) for improving outcomes in hip fractures, especially in the geriatric population. Our objective in this project was to implement consistent pre-surgical, emergency department (ED) FICB for hip fracture patients and to address barriers to implementation., Methods: With the support of a multidisciplinary team, including orthopedic surgery and anesthesia, a core team of emergency physicians developed and implemented a departmentwide FICB training and credentialing program. The goal was to have 80% of all emergency physicians credentialed to provide pre-surgical FICB to all hip fracture patients seen in the ED who met the criteria. Following implementation, we assessed approximately one year of data on hip fracture patients presenting to the ED. We evaluated whether or not they were eligible for FICB and, if so, whether or not they received it., Results: Emergency physician education has resulted in 86% of clinicians credentialed to perform FICB. Of 486 patients presenting for hip fracture, 295 (61%) were considered eligible for a block. Of those eligible, (54%) consented and underwent a FICB in the ED., Conclusion: A collaborative, multidisciplinary effort is vital for success. The primary barrier to achieving a higher percentage of eligible patients receiving blocks was the deficit of emergency physicians initially credentialed. Continuing education is ongoing, including credentialing and early identification of patients eligible for the fascia iliaca compartment block.

Objectives: To examine the impact of fascia iliaca (FI) blocks performed in the emergency department on patients with hip fracture on opioid consumption, length of stay, and readmission rate., Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting: Community-based Level 1 trauma center., Patients/participants: Ninety-eight patients with isolated femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and subtrochanteric femur fractures (OTA/AO 31-A and 31-B) presenting from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2020., Intervention: Ultrasound-guided FI compartment block using 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine., Main Outcome Measurements: Opioid consumption, length of stay, discharge disposition, and 30-day readmission rate., Results: Thirty-three patients had contraindication to FI block. Thirty-nine of 65 patients (60%) without contraindications to undergoing FIB received FI block. Mean age, body mass index, fracture type, and surgical procedure were similar between patients undergoing FIB and not receiving FIB. The FIB group had significantly lower opioid consumption preoperatively [17.4 vs. 32.0 morphine milliequivalents (MMEs)], postoperatively (37.1 vs. 85.5 MMEs), over total hospital stay (54.5 vs. 117.5 MMEs), and mean opioid consumption per day of hospital stay (13.3 vs. 24.0 MMEs). Patients in the FIB group had shorter length of stay compared with the control group (4.3 vs. 5.2 days). There was no significant difference in discharge disposition destination between groups. No patients reported complications of FI block., Conclusions: Undergoing FI block in the emergency department was associated with decreased opioid consumption, decreased length of stay, and decreased hospital readmission within 30 days of hip fracture., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of our study was to determine the accuracy of orthopaedic patient's reported height, weight, and body mass index (BMI). We hypothesized that patient's age, sex and/or BMI may affect their accuracy. We performed a prospective, observational study in the setting of our orthopaedic clinic. Differences between self-reported and actual values were calculated. Patients were categorized based on their age (< 65 vs. ≥ 65), sex, and actual BMI (<30 vs. >30). Student t-test and chi-square test were used to compare groups. Our study included 329 patients. Patients were more likely to underestimate weight (p < 0.001) and overestimate height (p = 0.007). Comparing patients with a BMI < 30 and > 30, height overestimation (0cm vs. 1.14cm, p = 0.004) and weight underestimation (0.09kg vs. 1.29kg, p = 0.02) discrepancies were greater in the BMI > 30 group. Patients, particularly with a BMI >30 kg/m2, over-estimate their height and under-estimate their weight. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 30(3):176-180, 2021).

Aims: Traditionally, acetabular component insertion during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is visually assisted in the posterior approach and fluoroscopically assisted in the anterior approach. The present study examined the accuracy of a new surgeon during anterior (NSA) and posterior (NSP) THA using robotic arm-assisted technology compared to two experienced surgeons using traditional methods., Methods: Prospectively collected data was reviewed for 120 patients at two institutions. Data were collected on the first 30 anterior approach and the first 30 posterior approach surgeries performed by a newly graduated arthroplasty surgeon (all using robotic arm-assisted technology) and was compared to standard THA by an experienced anterior (SSA) and posterior surgeon (SSP). Acetabular component inclination, version, and leg length were calculated postoperatively and differences calculated based on postoperative film measurement., Results: Demographic data were similar between groups with the exception of BMI being lower in the NSA group (27.98 vs 25.2; p = 0.005). Operating time and total time in operating room (TTOR) was lower in the SSA (p < 0.001) and TTOR was higher in the NSP group (p = 0.014). Planned versus postoperative leg length discrepancy were similar among both anterior and posterior surgeries (p > 0.104). Planned versus postoperative abduction and anteversion were similar among the NSA and SSA (p > 0.425), whereas planned versus postoperative abduction and anteversion were lower in the NSP (p < 0.001). Outliers > 10 mm from planned leg length were present in one case of the SSP and NSP, with none in the anterior groups. There were no outliers > 10° in anterior or posterior for abduction in all surgeons. The SSP had six outliers > 10° in anteversion while the NSP had none (p = 0.004); the SSA had no outliers for anteversion while the NSA had one (p = 0.500)., Conclusion: Robotic arm-assisted technology allowed a newly trained surgeon to produce similarly accurate results and outcomes as experienced surgeons in anterior and posterior hip arthroplasty. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open  2021;2(6):365-370.

Introduction: Hip fractures are a significant economic burden to our healthcare system. As there have been efforts made to create an alternative payment model for hip fracture care, it will be imperative to risk-stratify reimbursement for these medically comorbid patients. We hypothesized that patients readmitted to the hospital within 90 days would be more likely to have a recent previous hospital admission, prior to their injury. Patients with a recent prior admission could therefore be considered higher risk for readmission and increased cost., Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 598 patients who underwent surgical fixation of a hip or femur fracture. Data on readmissions within 90 days of surgical procedure and previous admissions in the year prior to injury resulting in surgical procedure were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine if recent prior admission had increased risk of 90-day readmission. A subgroup analysis of geriatric hip fractures and of readmitted patients were also performed., Results: Having a prior admission within one year was significantly associated (p < 0.0001) for 90-day readmission. Specifically, logistic regression analysis revealed that a prior admission was significantly associated with 90-day readmission with an odds ratio of 7.2 (95% CI: 4.8-10.9)., Discussion: This patient population has a high rate of prior hospital admissions, and these prior admissions were predictive of 90-day readmission. Alternative payment models that include penalties for readmissions or fail to apply robust risk stratification may unjustly penalize hospital systems which care for more medically complex patients., Conclusions: Hip fracture patients with a recent prior admission to the hospital are at an increased risk for 90-day readmission. This information should be considered as alternative payment models are developed for hip fracture care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the educational quality of YouTube videos pertaining to total knee arthroplasty and knee osteoarthritis., Methods: A systematic search for the terms "knee replacement" and "knee arthritis" was performed using YouTube's search function. Data from the 60 most relevant videos were collected for each search term. Quality assessment checklists with a scale of 0 to 10 points were developed to evaluate the video content. Videos were grouped into poor quality (grade 0-3), acceptable quality (grade 4-7), and excellent quality (grade 8-10), respectively., Results: Overall, 106 videos were categorized. For videos regarding total knee arthroplasty (n = 50), 64% of videos were of poor educational quality (32/50), 28% were of acceptable quality (14/50), and 8% were of good educational quality (4/50). Common missing information included discussion of surgical complications and implant duration. For videos regarding knee arthritis (n = 56), 66% of videos were of poor educational quality (37/56), 32% were of acceptable quality (18/56), and 2% were of good educational quality. Common missing information were causes and risk factors for knee arthritis and long-term prognosis., Conclusions: The present study suggests that YouTube is a poor educational source for patients regarding knee arthroplasty and knee arthritis. Recognizing the limitations of YouTube as well as which topics are not commonly presented may better guide physicians to educate their patients.