Search

The article is devoted to the problems of binaural cochlear implantation, especially in patients with a long time interval between surgeries. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of the time range between successive interventions in patients with binaural prosthetics using the CI system., Materials and Methods: the study included 50 patients aged 10 to 14 years, divided into 3 study groups: patients with unilateral cochlear implantation (group I), patients with bilateral implantation with a less than 1 year range between operations (group II) and patients with bilateral implantation with a more than 5 year range between interventions (group III). Comparative analysis was carried out using speech audiometry in silence and noise, assessment of sound localization and questionnaires to assess the auditory dynamics and speech development., Results: Patients in groups II and III showed comparable results in speech intelligibility in noise and sound localization. At the same time, these indicators turned out to be higher than in patients of group I. Patients from all three groups did not show statistically significant differences in speech intelligibility in silence and in the level of speech development., Conclusion: a long interval (more than 5 years) after the first implantation should not be considered as a contraindication to binaural implantation.

Objective: To evaluate the hearing outcomes of cochlear implantation in different age groups by using data collected in the HEARRING registry., Methods: A multicenter study. Data of 146 patients were collected in a HEARRING registry. Patients were divided into three different age groups; ≤ 55 years old (age group 1, n = 66), 56 to 69 years old (age group 2, n = 45), and ≥ 70 years old (age group 3, n = 35). Speech in quiet (SPIQ), speech in noise (SPIN), and hearing implant sound quality index (HISQUI19) scores were evaluated for the different age groups at different test moments (preoperatively, 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo after first fitting)., Results: A statistically significant difference (p < 0.01) was found between preoperative scores and the scores on all the follow-up moments across all age groups. For SPIQ and SPIN, none of the time points showed a statistically significant age effect (p = 0.88 and p = 0.89). For HISQUI19 scores, a statistically significant age effect was found at 12 months after first fitting. The oldest age group scored significantly lower on the HISQUI19 compared with the youngest age group., Conclusion: Hearing outcomes of adult cochlear implant users of different age groups were evaluated. The SPIQ and SPIN tests showed no significant differences between the different age groups. Nevertheless, the youngest group scored significantly better on self -perceived benefit (HISQUI19) with a cochlear implant compared with the oldest age group.Further research is needed to receive more insight into cochlear implantation in the elderly and its implications on rehabilitating and supporting this expanding older population.

Objective: To determine the time needed to remotely perform a set of intraoperative measurements during cochlear implantation surgery and to compare it to the time needed to perform the same measurements in theatre., Design: Prospective two-arm study comparing a local with a remote measurement setting. Three intraoperative measurements (Impedance Field Telemetry (IFT), evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and evoked stapedius reflex test (eSRT)) were performed with the audiologist present in the operating theatre (i.e. locally) or with the audiologist in his/her office (i.e. remotely). The time needed to complete the measurements, in total and individually, were measured and compared., Study Sample: Fifty cochlear implant recipients, aged 0.7-48 years Results: IFT, ECAP and eSRT were performed successfully in all participants. Comparing locally and remotely performed measurements, IFT did not differ significantly, ECAP threshold or slope did not differ significantly differ in any single channel and eSRT measurements did not differ significantly except for in one of six channels. Remote measurements took 8.6 min less to perform than did local measurements (10.04 vs. 18.64 min); a significant difference (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Using a remote network connection for intraoperative objective measurements is an efficient and safe way to perform measurements during cochlear implantation surgery.