1. Suprapubic versus transurethral catheterization for bladder drainage in male rectal cancer surgery (GRECCAR10), a randomized clinical trial.
- Author
-
Trilling B, Tidadini F, Lakkis Z, Jafari M, Germain A, Rullier E, Lefevre J, Tuech JJ, Kartheuser A, Leonard D, Prudhomme M, Piessen G, Regimbeau JM, Cotte E, Duprez D, Badic B, Panis Y, Rivoire M, Meunier B, Portier G, Bosson JL, Vilotitch A, Foote A, Caspar Y, Rouanet P, and Faucheron JL
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Aged, Urinary Bladder surgery, Belgium, Rectal Neoplasms surgery, Urinary Catheterization methods, Urinary Catheterization adverse effects, Drainage methods, Urinary Tract Infections etiology, Urinary Tract Infections prevention & control, Urinary Tract Infections epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Postoperative Complications epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: Bladder drainage is systematically used in rectal cancer surgery; however, the optimal type of drainage, transurethral catheterization (TUC) or suprapubic catheterization (SPC), is still controversial. The aim was to compare the rates of urinary tract infection on the fourth postoperative day (POD4) between TUC and SPC, after rectal cancer surgery regardless of the day of removal of the urinary drain., Methods: This randomized clinical trial in 19 expert colorectal surgery centers in France and Belgium was performed between October 2016 and October 2019 and included 240 men (with normal or subnormal voiding function) undergoing mesorectal excision with low anastomosis for rectal cancer. Patients were followed at postoperative days 4, 30, and 180., Results: In 208 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 58-71]) randomized to TUC (n = 99) or SPC (n = 109), the rate of urinary infection at POD4 was not significantly different whatever the type of drainage (11/99 (11.1%) vs. 8/109 (7.3%), 95% CI, - 4.2% to 11.7%; p = 0.35). There was significantly more pyuria in the TUC group (79/99 (79.0%) vs. (60/109 (60.9%), 95% CI, 5.7-30.0%; p = 0.004). No difference in bacteriuria was observed between the groups. Patients in the TUC group had a shorter duration of catheterization (median 4 [2-5] vs. 4 [3-5] days; p = 0.002). Drainage complications were more frequent in the SPC group at all followup visits., Conclusions: TUC should be preferred over SPC in male patients undergoing surgery for mid and/or lower rectal cancers, owing to the lower rate of complications and shorter duration of catheterization., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02922647., (© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF