1. Comparison of Time to Next Treatment or Death Between Front-Line Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DRd) Versus Bortezomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (VRd) Among Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
- Author
-
Hansen DK, Gautam S, Lafeuille MH, Rossi C, Moore B, Tardif-Samson A, Thompson-Leduc P, Fu AZ, Cortoos A, Kaila S, and Fonseca R
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Time-to-Treatment, Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal administration & dosage, Aged, 80 and over, Retrospective Studies, Multiple Myeloma drug therapy, Multiple Myeloma mortality, Dexamethasone administration & dosage, Dexamethasone therapeutic use, Lenalidomide therapeutic use, Lenalidomide administration & dosage, Bortezomib administration & dosage, Bortezomib therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
- Abstract
Introduction: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd) and bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) are the only preferred treatment regimens for patients with transplant-ineligible (TIE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). As there are no randomized head-to-head studies of DRd versus VRd, this analysis aimed to compare real-world time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) or death in this population., Methods: Patients with NDMM who received front-line (FL) DRd or VRd were identified from the Acentrus database (January 1, 2018 to May 31, 2023). Those with a record of a stem cell transplant or aged < 65 years were excluded to limit analysis to the TIE population. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline patient characteristics. A doubly robust Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare TTNT or death between cohorts., Results: A total of 149 and 494 patients who initiated DRd and VRd, respectively, were identified. After weighting (weighted N
DRd = 302, weighted NVRd = 341), cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. Of these, 98 (32.4%) DRd and 175 (51.2%) VRd patients either received a subsequent line of therapy or died, with a median TTNT or death of 37.8 months in the DRd cohort and 18.7 months in the VRd cohort (hazard ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.35, 0.81; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Treatment of TIE NDMM patients with DRd led to a significantly longer TTNT or death compared to VRd, evidenced by a 42% risk reduction, supporting the effectiveness of DRd over VRd as FL treatment in this patient population., (© 2024 Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF