1. PRO score: predictive scoring system for visual outcomes after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.
- Author
-
Cai LZ, Lin J, Starr MR, Obeid A, Ryan EH, Ryan C, Forbes NJ, Arias D, Ammar MJ, Patel LG, Capone A, Emerson GG, Joseph DP, Eliott D, Gupta OP, Regillo CD, Hsu J, and Yonekawa Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Retina, Scleral Buckling adverse effects, Vitreous Body, Vitrectomy adverse effects, Retrospective Studies, Retinal Detachment diagnosis, Retinal Detachment surgery, Retinal Detachment etiology, Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative surgery
- Abstract
Background/aims: To compare risk factors for poor visual outcomes in patients undergoing primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair and to develop a scoring system., Methods: Analysis of the Primary Retinal detachment Outcomes (PRO) study, a multicentre interventional cohort of consecutive primary RRD surgeries performed in 2015. The main outcome measure was a poor visual outcome (Snellen VA ≤20/200)., Results: A total of 1178 cases were included. The mean preoperative and postoperative logMARs were 1.1±1.1 (20/250) and 0.5±0.7 (20/63), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression identified preoperative risk factors predictive of poor visual outcomes (≤20/200), including proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (OR 1.26; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.40), history of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections (1.38; 1.11 to 1.71), >1-week vision loss (1.17; 1.08 to 1.27), ocular comorbidities (1.18; 1.00 to 1.38), poor presenting VA (1.06 per initial logMAR unit; 1.02 to 1.10) and age >70 (1.13; 1.04 to 1.23). The data were split into training (75%) and validation (25%) and a scoring system was developed and validated. The risk for poor visual outcomes was 8% with a total score of 0, 17% with 1, 29% with 2, 47% with 3, and 71% with 4 or higher., Conclusions: Independent risk factors were compared for poor visual outcomes after RRD surgery, which included PVR, anti-VEGF injections, vision loss >1 week, ocular comorbidities, presenting VA and older age. The PRO score was developed to provide a scoring system that may be useful in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Consultant for Alcon (CR, DE, OG, YY), Grant support from Alcon (AC), Royalties from Alcon (EHR), Stockholder in Aldeyra Therapeutics (DE, CR), Consultant for Dutch Ophthalmic (DE), Scientific Advisory Board for Pykus Therapeutics (DE), Stockholder in Valiant and Glaukos (GGE)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF