Search

Background: There is a robust relationship between depression and substance use in youth, with higher levels of substance use associated with greater depressive symptomatology. However, previous research has examined individual substances, without consideration of psychiatric comorbidities. Here, we investigate patterns of substance use among depressed and/or suicidal youth within the context of psychiatric comorbidities., Methods: 945 youth with depression and/or suicidality from the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network (TX-YDSRN) were assessed for current use of alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, and other drugs and comorbid psychiatric diagnoses. We used latent class analysis to identify patterns of past-year substance use, then examined if demographics or psychiatric disorders predicted class membership., Results: We identified three patterns of substance use: non-use (63.4 %), moderate likelihood of using alcohol, nicotine and cannabis (23.8 %), and high likelihood of using all substances (12.7 %). Compared to non-users, individuals in the moderate and high likelihood classes were more likely to be older. Individuals in the high likelihood class were more likely to have a substance use disorder, ADHD, and higher suicidality scores., Limitations: We cannot ascertain the causal or temporal ordering of substance use and psychiatric diagnoses due to the cross-sectional nature of the study., Conclusions: Using a brief, self-report measure of substance use, we identified three classes of substance users differing in probability of past-year use, which were predicted by older age and some psychiatric comorbidities. While research on universal screening of substance use in youth remains limited, we discuss who may benefit from such screening among depressed youth., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Drs. Mitchell and Wakefield serve as Executive Committee Members of the Texas Child Mental Health Care Consortium. Dr. Jha has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus and Janssen Research & Development; honorarium to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network and as Guest Editor for Psychiatric Clinics of North America from Elsevier; consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc., Janssen Global Services, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Guidepoint Global; fees to serve on Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Worldwide Clinical Trials (Eliem and Inversargo), Vicore Pharma and IQVIA (Click); and honoraria for educational presentations from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, H.C. Wainwright & Co., and Global Medical Education. Dr. Soares has served as a consultant to Boehringer Ingelheim, Livanova, Sunovian, and Johnson & Johnson. He has served on the advisory board of Alkermes and received research grants from Compass Pathways, Mind Med, and Relmada Therapeutics Inc. Dr. Trivedi has provided consulting services to Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Alkermes Inc., Alto Neuroscience Inc., Axsome Therapeutics, BasePoint Health management LLC, Biogen MA Inc., Cerebral Inc., Circular Genomics Inc., Compass Pathfinder Limited, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., GH Research, GreenLight VitalSign6 Inc., Heading Health, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Legion Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine Inc., Myriad Neuroscience, Naki Health Ltd., Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc., Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., Otsuka Europe LTD, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc., Praxis Precision Medicines Inc., PureTech LYT Inc., Relmada Therapeutics Inc., SAGE Therapeutics, Signant Health, Sparian Biosciences, Titan Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc., WebMD. He has received grant/research funding from NIMH, NIDA, NCATS, American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, SAMHSA, and the DoD. Additionally, he has received editorial compensation from Elsevier and Oxford University Press. No other authors have interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The burden of major depressive disorder is compounded by a limited understanding of its risk factors, the limited efficacy of treatments, and the lack of precision approaches to guide treatment selection. The Texas Resilience Against Depression (T-RAD) study was designed to explore the etiology of depression by collecting comprehensive socio-demographic, clinical, behavioral, neurophysiological/neuroimaging, and biological data from depressed individuals (D2K) and youth at risk for depression (RAD)., Methods: This report details the baseline sociodemographic, clinical, and functional features from the initial cohort (D2K N = 1040, RAD N = 365)., Results: Of the total T-RAD sample, n = 1078 (76.73 %) attended ≥2 in-person visits, and n = 845 (60.14 %) attended ≥4 in-person visits. Most D2K (84.82 %) had a primary diagnosis of any depressive disorder, with a bipolar disorder diagnosis being prevalent (13.49 %). RAD participants (75.89 %) did not have a psychiatric diagnosis, but other non-depressive diagnoses were present. D2K participants had 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores at or near the moderate range (10.58 ± 6.42 > 24 yrs.; 9.73 ± 6.12 10-24 yrs). RAD participants were in the non-depressed range (2.19 ± 2.65). While the age ranges in D2K and RAD differ, the potential to conduct analyses that compare at-risk and depressed youth is a strength of the study. The opportunity to examine the trajectory of depressive symptoms in the D2K cohort over the lifespan is unique., Limitations: As a longitudinal study, missing data were common., Conclusion: T-RAD will allow data to be collected from multiple modalities on a clinically well-characterized sample. These data will drive important discoveries on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of depression., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Madhukar H. Trivedi has provided consulting services to Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Alkermes Inc., Alto Neuroscience Inc., Axsome Therapeutics, Biogen MA Inc., Cerebral Inc., Circular Genomics Inc., Compass Pathfinder Limited, GH Research, GreenLight VitalSign6 Inc., Heading Health, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Legion Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine Inc., Myriad Neuroscience, Naki Health Ltd., Navitor, Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc., Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc., Perception Neuroscience Holdings, Pharmerit International, Policy Analysis Inc., Praxis Precision Medicines Inc., PureTech LYT Inc., Relmada Therapeutics Inc., Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., SAGE Therapeutics, Signant Health, Sparian Biosciences, Titan Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc., WebMD. He has received grant/research funding from NIMH, NIDA, NCATS, American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas. Additionally, he has received editorial compensation from Engage Health Media, and Oxford University Press. Manish K. Jha has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus and Janssen Research & Development; educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network; consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc., Janssen Global Services, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Worldwide Clinical Trials/Eliem and Inversargo, Boehringer Ingelhein, and Guidepoint Global; and honoraria from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, and Global Medical Education. Thomas Carmody has served as a consultant for Alkermes, Inc. Jane A. Foster has served on the Scientific Advisory Board for MRM Health NL and has received consulting/speaker fees from Klaire Labs, Takeda Canada and Rothman, Benson, Hedges Inc. Joshua S. Elmore, Cherise Chin Fatt, Sangita Sethuram, Tianyi Wang, Taryn L. Mayes, and Abu Minhajuddin do not have any declarations., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: A 12-week placebo-controlled, sequential parallel Accelerated Development of Additive Pharmacotherapy Treatment for Methamphetamine Use Disorder (ADAPT-2) trial evaluated the effects of extended-release injectable naltrexone plus extended-release oral bupropion (NTX + BUPN) on methamphetamine (MA) use over two stages. This study reports on the previously unpublished stage 2 MA use in participants randomized at stage 1 to receive NTX + BUPN through both stages compared with those assigned to placebo., Design: This is a secondary analysis of the US National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) ADAPT-2 network trial., Setting: The parent ADAPT-2 trial was carried out across multiple NIDA Clinical Trials Network (CTN) sites in the United States., Participants: This analysis includes 403 people with MA use disorder who participated in the ADAPT-2 CTN trial., Intervention and Comparator: NTX + BUPN was compared with placebo over the course of the trial., Measurement: MA use was measured by urine drug screens conducted twice weekly for 12 weeks, then once in week 13 and once in week 16 post-treatment follow-up., Findings: Participants on NTX + BUPN in stage 1 showed an additional 9.2% increase [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09%-17.9%, P = 0.038] during stage 2 in their probability of testing negative for MA, with a total increase of 27.1% (95% CI, 13.2%-41.1%, P < 0.001) over the full 12 weeks of treatment. In contrast, participants on placebo in both stages increased in probability of testing MA-negative by a total of 11.4% (95% CI, 4.1%-18.6%, P = 0.002) over all 12 weeks. The 12-week increase among participants on NTX + BUPN was significantly greater-by 15.8% (95% CI, 4.5%-27.0%, P = 0.006)-than the increase among those on placebo., Conclusion: For people with methamphetamine (MA) use disorder receiving treatment with extended-release injectable naltrexone plus extended-release oral bupropion (NTX + BUPN), continued treatment with NTX + BUPN after 6 weeks is associated with additional reductions in MA use up to 12 weeks., (© 2024 Society for the Study of Addiction.)

Background: Substance use among adolescents is common and associated with significant consequences, including depression. Adolescents can experience myriad problems related to early onset substance use and depression, making further understanding of this comorbidity necessary., Method: Participants were a subset from a large-scale performance improvement project and consisted of adolescents aged 12-18 who screened positive for depression during their routine medical or psychiatric appointment and who then completed the substance use assessment Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble Version 2.1 (CRAFFT). Participants with problematic substance use had a CRAFFT score ≥2., Results: A total of 621 participants were included in this study, and 105 (16.9%) reported problematic substance use. Compared with participants without problematic substance use, those with problematic use were more likely to have moderate to severe depression and anxiety, as well as significantly higher irritability, impulsivity, suicidal propensity, and suicidal thoughts scores. Controlling for age at screening, sex, race, and ethnicity, problematic substance use remained a significant predictor of depression severity, impulsivity, suicidal propensity, and suicidal thoughts., Limitations: Participants were from a large, metropolitan area of the Southwest United States who must have screened positive for depression, so results may not generalize. Because all participants were underage, they may have been wary in responding to the substance use assessment accurately., Conclusions: By using a large, diverse sample in a real-world clinical setting, findings strengthen the association between problematic substance use and depression and depression-associated symptoms among adolescents, highlighting the need for early detection and universal depression screening., Competing Interests: The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Marino reports no conflicts of interest. Dr. Jha is supported by an NIMH career development award (MH126202), the O’Donnell Clinical Neuroscience Scholar Award from UT Southwestern Medical Center. He has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus and Janssen Research & Development, educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network, consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc, Janssen Global Services, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Worldwide Clinical Trials/Eliem and Inversargo, and Guidepoint Global, and honoraria from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, and Global Medical Education. Dr. Minhajuddin, Dr. Ayvaci, Ms. Levinson, and Mr. Pipes report no conflicts of interest. Dr. Emslie is a consultant for Lundbeck and Neuronetics. Dr. Emslie receives research support from American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP), Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Research & Development, the National Institutes of Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and the State of Texas. Dr. Trivedi has received research funding from NIMH, NIDA, NCATS, the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas. He has served as a consultant or advisor for ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC., Akili Interactive, ALKERMES INC (Pub Steering Comm-ALKS5461), Allergan Sales LLC, Alto Neuroscience, Inc. , Applied Clinical Intelligence, LLC (ACI), Axome Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Engage Health Media, Gh Research, GreenLight VitalSign6, Inc., Heading Health, Inc., Health Care Global Village, Janssen – Cilag.SA, Janssen Research and Development, LLC (Adv Committee Esketamine), Janssen Research and Development, LLC (panel for study design for MDD relapse), Janssen - ORBIT, Legion Health, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, LUNDBECK RESEARCH U.S.A, Medscape, LLC, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc., Myriad Neuroscience, Neurocrine Biosciences Inc, Navitor, Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (PsychU, MDD Section Advisor), Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. (MDD expert), Pax Neuroscience , Perception Neuroscience Holdings, Inc., Pharmerit International, LP, Policy Analysis Inc., Sage, Therapeutics, Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sage Therapeutics, Signant Health, SK Life Science, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., The Baldwin Group, Inc., and Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Trivedi also received editorial compensation from Oxford University Press. Disclaimer: The Intellectual Property of VitalSign6 belongs to the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Principal Investigator, Dr Trivedi) and is now licensed to GLVS6 for future distribution., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Further research is needed to help improve both the standard of care and the outcome for patients with treatment-resistant depression. A particularly critical evidence gap exists with respect to whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological augmentation is superior to antidepressant switch, or vice-versa. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of augmentation with aripiprazole or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus switching to the antidepressant venlafaxine XR (or duloxetine for those not eligible to receive venlafaxine) for treatment-resistant depression. In this multi-site, 8-week, randomized, open-label study, 278 subjects (196 females and 82 males, mean age 45.6 years (SD 15.3)) with treatment-resistant depression were assigned in a 1:1:1 fashion to treatment with either of these three interventions; 235 subjects completed the study. 260 randomized subjects with at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating (MADRS) assessment were included in the analysis. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (score change (standard error (se)) = -17.39 (1.3) (p = 0.015) but not aripiprazole augmentation (score change (se) = -14.9 (1.1) (p = 0.069) was superior to switch (score change (se) = -13.22 (1.1)) on the MADRS. Aripiprazole (mean change (se) = -37.79 (2.9) (p = 0.003) but not repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation (mean change (se) = -42.96 (3.6) (p = 0.031) was superior to switch (mean change (se) = -34.45 (3.0)) on the symptoms of depression questionnaire. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation was shown to be more effective than switching antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression on the study primary measure. In light of these findings, clinicians should consider repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation early-on for treatment-resistant depression.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02977299., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Similar outcomes and remission rates have been found for the treatment of depression in adults in primary and psychiatric care settings. However, comparatively little is known about how pediatric depression is managed across different settings. This study aims to address this gap by comparing depression treatment in pediatric and psychiatric settings. We hypothesized that pediatric care settings would be more likely to treat individuals with lower depression severity and would select pharmacotherapy less frequently as a treatment option. Methods: Patients ( n  = 3498) were screened for depression at a children's hospital from May 2017 to May 2022 as part of the VitalSign 6 project, a web-based application for depression management. The two-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ) was used for screening, and the data set contains patient-reported measures and provider-reported diagnoses and treatment selections at each clinic visit. Patients with nine-item PHQ (PHQ-9) scores ≥10 at baseline were included in the analysis to compare diagnosis and treatment recommendations between pediatric and psychiatric settings. Results: Among the 1323 patients who screened positive for depression, those in psychiatric settings had higher PHQ-9 scores (15.9 ± 5.0 vs. 12.1 ± 5.5; p  < 0.0001). Patients with PHQ-9 ≥ 10 in psychiatric settings were more likely to be diagnosed with major depressive disorder (60.6% vs. 24.7%, p  < 0.0001) and receive pharmacotherapy (54.8% vs. 6.6%) than those in pediatric settings. Pediatric setting patients were more likely to receive nonpharmacological treatment alone (36.3% vs. 4.3%) or an outside referral (27.7% vs. 5.7%). Remission rates did not significantly differ between the two settings. Conclusions: Youth in psychiatric settings are more likely to screen positive for depression and to have greater depression severity than those in pediatric settings. Both settings provide treatment recommendations for moderate-to-severe depression, but treatment types vary substantially. Yet, remission rates remain similar. Further research is needed to understand the nuances of treatment differences and their implications.

Background: Profiling patients on a proposed 'immunometabolic depression' (IMD) dimension, described as a cluster of atypical depressive symptoms related to energy regulation and immunometabolic dysregulations, may optimise personalised treatment., Aims: To test the hypothesis that baseline IMD features predict poorer treatment outcomes with antidepressants., Method: Data on 2551 individuals with depression across the iSPOT-D ( n = 967), CO-MED ( n = 665), GENDEP ( n = 773) and EMBARC ( n = 146) clinical trials were used. Predictors included baseline severity of atypical energy-related symptoms (AES), body mass index (BMI) and C-reactive protein levels (CRP, three trials only) separately and aggregated into an IMD index. Mixed models on the primary outcome (change in depressive symptom severity) and logistic regressions on secondary outcomes (response and remission) were conducted for the individual trial data-sets and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses., Results: Although AES severity and BMI did not predict changes in depressive symptom severity, higher baseline CRP predicted smaller reductions in depressive symptoms ( n = 376, β pooled = 0.06, P = 0.049, 95% CI 0.0001-0.12, I 2 = 3.61%); this was also found for an IMD index combining these features ( n = 372, β pooled = 0.12, s.e. = 0.12, P = 0.031, 95% CI 0.01-0.22, I 2 = 23.91%), with a higher - but still small - effect size compared with CRP. Confining analyses to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users indicated larger effects of CRP (β pooled = 0.16) and the IMD index (β pooled = 0.20). Baseline IMD features, both separately and combined, did not predict response or remission., Conclusions: Depressive symptoms of people with more IMD features improved less when treated with antidepressants. However, clinical relevance is limited owing to small effect sizes in inconsistent associations. Whether these patients would benefit more from treatments targeting immunometabolic pathways remains to be investigated.

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measure, which assesses past week status of seven domains (physical function mobility, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, pain interference, and pain intensity), represents a new paradigm using patient-reported outcomes. We used a data-driven approach with PROMIS to identify subgroups of youths receiving depression treatment., Methods: Youths (n = 721) enrolled in the Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network who completed the PROMIS were analyzed. Latent class analyses (LCAs) identified subgroups and compared their baseline clinical/sociodemographic features., Results: Compared to population norms, our sample had worse than average physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain interference. Using LCA, four subgroups were identified: 1) lower symptom severity and higher physical functioning (14.6 %); 2) higher symptom burden, higher pain interference/intensity, and lower physical functioning (52.7 %); 3) higher symptom burden, higher pain interference/intensity, but with higher physical functioning (9.2 %); and 4) higher symptom burden, but lower physical functioning and pain interference/intensity (23.6 %). Group 3 demonstrated higher resilience than Group 2. In contrast, Group 2 had higher anxiety than Group 4., Limitations: Individuals may have different symptom profiles due to the observational nature of the study. Replication of these subgroups may be difficult, as future samples may differ in these characteristics. Further work may demonstrate the stability of these groups., Conclusions: A data-driven analysis identified a small but significant subgroup with high physical functioning despite high symptom burden and pain, and this group reported higher resilience. Resilience-enhancing interventions may help improve functional outcomes in depressed youth., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Jha has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus and Janssen Research & Development; educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network; consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc., Janssen Global Services, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Worldwide Clinical Trials/Eliem and Inversargo, Boehringer Ingelhein, and Guidepoint Global; and honoraria from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, and Global Medical Education. Dr. Storch reports receiving research funding to his institution from the Ream Foundation, International OCD Foundation, and NIH. He is a consultant for Brainsway and Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. He owns stock less than $5000 in NView. He receives book royalties from Elsevier, Wiley, Oxford, American Psychological Association, Guildford, Springer, and Jessica Kingsley. Dr. Soutello reports for the period 2018–2022 non-personal research funds from Lundbeck and Janssen; is a consultant/advisory board member of Editorial Médica Panamericana, EUNETHYDIS (European Network on Hyperkinetic Disorder), NeuroTech Solutions Ltd. (Israel), Limbix Health DSMB (United States), MEDEA (Spain), Tech Innosphere Engineering LTD (Germany), and Shire/now part of Takeda (Spain); received speaker's bureau fees from Bial (Portugal), Cuquerella Medical Consulting (Spain), Medice (Germany), Rubio (Spain), Tecnofarma (Peru), and Shire/now part of Takeda (Spain), and royalties from Editorial Médica Panamericana (Spain). Dr. Trivedi has served as a consultant or advisor for Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Akili Interactive, Alkermes, Inc. (Pub Steering Comm-ALKS5461), Allergan Sales LLC, Alto Neuroscience, Inc., Applied Clinical Intelligence, LLC (ACI), Axome Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Engage Health Media, Gh Research, GreenLight VitalSign6, Inc., Heading Health, Inc., Health Care Global Village, Janssen – Cilag.SA, Janssen Research and Development, LLC (Adv Committee Esketamine), Janssen Research and Development, LLC (panel for study design for MDD relapse), Janssen – ORBIT, Legion Health, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck Research U.S.A., Medscape, LLC, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc., Myriad Neuroscience, Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Navitor, Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (PsychU, MDD Section Advisor), Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. (MDD expert), Pax Neuroscience, Perception Neuroscience Holdings, Inc., Pharmerit International, LP, Policy Analysis Inc., Sage, Therapeutics, Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sage Therapeutics, Signant Health, SK Life Science, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., The Baldwin Group, Inc., and Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Trivedi also received editorial compensation from Oxford University Press. Dr. Minhajuddin, Dr. Slater, Mrs. Mayes, Dr. Shotwell, and Dr. Wakefield have no conflicts to disclose., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

This report examines the predictive capabilities of two scales of suicidality in high-risk adolescents. Charts of adolescents with severe suicidality participating in an intensive outpatient program were reviewed. Self-report data from the 9-item Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report (CHRT-SR 9 ) and clinician-completed data from the Columbia Suicide Severity Risk Scale (C-SSRS) were obtained at entry. Scales' performances in predicting suicide attempts and suicidal events were evaluated using logistic regression models and ROC analyses. Of 539 adolescents, 53 had events of which 19 were attempts. The CHRT-SR 9 total score predicted events (OR=1.05) and attempts (OR=1.09), as did the C-SSRS Suicide Ideation (SI) Intensity Composite for events (OR=1.10) and attempts (OR=1.16). The CHRT-SR 9 AUC was 0.70 (84.2% sensitivity; 41.7% specificity; PPV=5.0%; NPV=98.6%) for attempts. The C-SSRS Intensity Composite AUC was 0.62 (89.5% sensitivity; 24.1% specificity; PPV=4.2%; NPV=98.4%) for attempts. Both the CHRT-SR 9 and C-SSRS capture important parameters related to suicidal events or attempts that can help assess suicidal risk in adolescents., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Thomas Carmody has served as a consultant for Alkermes, Inc. A. John Rush has received consulting fees from Compass Inc., Curbstone Consultant LLC, Emmes Corp., Evecxia Therapeutics, Inc., Holmusk Technologies, Inc., Johnson and Johnson (Janssen), Liva-Nova, MindStreet, Inc., Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Otsuka-US; speaking fees from Liva-Nova, Johnson and Johnson (Janssen); and royalties from Wolters Kluwer Health, Guilford Press and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (for the Inventory of Depressive Symptoms and its derivatives). He is also named co-inventor on two patents: U.S. Patent No. 7795,033: Methods to Predict the Outcome of Treatment with Antidepressant Medication, Inventors: McMahon FJ, Laje G, Manji H, Rush AJ, Paddock S, Wilson AS; and U.S. Patent No. 7906,283: Methods to Identify. Graham Emslie has received research support from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP), Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Research & Development, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and the State of Texas; and consulting fees from Lundbeck and Neuronetics. Jennifer Hughes has received research support from NIMH, the Texas Health Resources Community Impact Grant, the Jerry M. Lewis, MD, Mental Health Research Foundation, and the state of Texas; she has been a consultant for JED Foundation, Mental Health in Mind, International AB, and RTI International. She has received honoraria for national and international trainings on youth suicide prevention and intervention programs and has received book royalties from Guilford Press for CBT for Depression in Children and Adolescents: A Guide to Relapse Prevention. Dr. Hughes serves as a board member for the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 53, Society for Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (SCCAP); she received a stipend for publishing the newsletter as part of her appointed position from 2017 to 2021. Beth Kennard receives royalties from Guilford, Press, Inc; and serves on the board of trustees for the Jerry M. Lewis, III, MD Research Foundation. Manish Jha has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus and Janssen Research & Development, educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network, consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc, Janssen Global Services, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Worldwide Clinical Trials/Eliem, and Guidepoint Global, and honoraria from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, and Global Medical Education. Madhukar Trivedi has served as a consultant or advisor for Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Akili Interactive, Alkermes, Inc. (Pub Steering Comm-ALKS5461), Allergan Sales LLC, Alto Neuroscience, Inc., Applied Clinical Intelligence, LLC (ACI), Axome Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Engage Health Media, Gh Research, GreenLight VitalSign6, Inc., Heading Health, Inc., Health Care Global Village, Janssen – Cilag.SA, Janssen Research and Development, LLC (Adv Committee Esketamine), Janssen Research and Development, LLC (panel for study design for MDD relapse), Janssen - ORBIT, Legion Health, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck Research U.S.A, Medscape, LLC, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc., Myriad Neuroscience, Neurocrine Biosciences Inc, Navitor, Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (PsychU, MDD Section Advisor), Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. (MDD expert), Pax Neuroscience, Perception Neuroscience Holdings, Inc., Pharmerit International, LP, Policy Analysis Inc., Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sage Therapeutics, Signant Health, SK Life Science, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., The Baldwin Group, Inc., and Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Trivedi also received editorial compensation from Oxford University Press. Taryn Mayes, Karabi Nandy, Kathryn Forbes, and Jessica Heerschap have no financial disclosures to report., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Insomnia is prevalent in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) and is a key diagnostic criterion of MDD; however, little is understood about the burden of insomnia symptom severity in MDD. We evaluated the relationship between insomnia symptom severity and the clinical, economic, and patient-centric burden among community-dwelling individuals with MDD., Methods: Respondents with diagnosed depression who reported insomnia symptoms in the past 12 months (N = 4402) were identified from the 2019 United States National Health and Wellness Survey. Multivariable analyses assessed the association of Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) with health-related outcomes while controlling for sociodemographic and health characteristics. Further analyses also controlled for depression severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire)., Results: Mean ISI score was 14.3 ± 5.6. Higher ISI was associated with greater depression severity (r = .51, p < .001). After adjustments, a one-standard deviation (5.6-point) increase in ISI score was significantly associated with higher depression (rate ratio [RR] = 1.36), anxiety (RR = 1.33) and daytime sleepiness (RR = 1.16) levels, more healthcare provider (RR = 1.13) and emergency room visits (RR = 1.31), hospitalizations (RR = 1.21), work productivity and activity impairment (RRs = 1.27 and 1.23, respectively), and poorer mental and physical health-related quality of life (β = -3.853 and -1.999, respectively) (p < .001). These findings remained statistically significant when controlling for concurrent depression severity., Conclusion: In adults with MDD, greater insomnia symptom severity is associated with worse health-related outcomes, which suggests the importance of addressing insomnia symptoms as a clinical target for treating MDD., (© 2023 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The probabilistic reward task (PRT) has identified reward learning impairments in those with major depressive disorder (MDD), as well as anhedonia-specific reward learning impairments. However, attempts to validate the anhedonia-specific impairments have produced inconsistent findings. Thus, we seek to determine whether the Reward Behavior Disengagement (RBD), our proposed economic augmentation of PRT, differs between MDD participants and controls, and whether there is a level at which RBD is high enough for depressed participants to be considered objectively disengaged. Data were gathered as part of the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care (EMBARC) study, a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of antidepressant response. Participants included 195 individuals with moderate to severe MDD (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) score ≥ 15), not in treatment for depression, and with complete PRT data. Healthy controls ( n = 40) had no history of psychiatric illness, a QIDS-SR score < 8, and complete PRT data. Participants with MDD were treated with sertraline or placebo for 8 weeks (stage I of the EMBARC trial). RBD was applied to PRT data using discriminant analysis, and classified MDD participants as reward task engaged ( n = 137) or reward task disengaged ( n = 58), relative to controls. Reward task engaged/disengaged groups were compared on sociodemographic features, reward-behavior, and sertraline/placebo response (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores). Reward task disengaged MDD participants responded only to sertraline, whereas those who were reward task engaged responded to sertraline and placebo ( F (1293) = 4.33, p = 0.038). Reward task engaged/disengaged groups did not differ otherwise. RBD was predictive of reward impairment in depressed patients and may have clinical utility in identifying patients who will benefit from antidepressants.

Objective: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic and disabling disorder, for which available pharmacotherapies have limited efficacy. The authors' previous proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial of single-dose intravenous ketamine infusion in individuals with PTSD showed significant and rapid PTSD symptom reduction 24 hours postinfusion. The present study is the first randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy and safety of repeated intravenous ketamine infusions for the treatment of chronic PTSD., Methods: Individuals with chronic PTSD (N=30) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six infusions of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.045 mg/kg) (psychoactive placebo control) over 2 consecutive weeks. Clinician-rated and self-report assessments were administered 24 hours after the first infusion and at weekly visits. The primary outcome measure was change in PTSD symptom severity, as assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5), from baseline to 2 weeks (after completion of all infusions). Secondary outcome measures included the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and side effect measures., Results: The ketamine group showed a significantly greater improvement in CAPS-5 and MADRS total scores than the midazolam group from baseline to week 2. At week 2, the mean CAPS-5 total score was 11.88 points (SE=3.96) lower in the ketamine group than in the midazolam group (d=1.13, 95% CI=0.36, 1.91). Sixty-seven percent of participants in the ketamine group were treatment responders, compared with 20% in the midazolam group. Among ketamine responders, the median time to loss of response was 27.5 days following the 2-week course of infusions. Ketamine infusions were well tolerated overall, without serious adverse events., Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial provides the first evidence of efficacy of repeated ketamine infusions in reducing symptom severity in individuals with chronic PTSD. Further studies are warranted to understand ketamine's full potential as a treatment for chronic PTSD.Reprinted from Am J Psychiatry 2021; 178:193-202 , with permission from American Psychiatric Association Publishing. Copyright © 2021., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Psychiatric Association.)

Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and subanesthetic intravenous ketamine are both currently used for treatment-resistant major depression, but the comparative effectiveness of the two treatments remains uncertain., Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial involving patients referred to ECT clinics for treatment-resistant major depression. Patients with treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis were recruited and assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ketamine or ECT. During an initial 3-week treatment phase, patients received either ECT three times per week or ketamine (0.5 mg per kilogram of body weight over 40 minutes) twice per week. The primary outcome was a response to treatment (i.e., a decrease of ≥50% from baseline in the score on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report; scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depression). The noninferiority margin was -10 percentage points. Secondary outcomes included scores on memory tests and patient-reported quality of life. After the initial treatment phase, the patients who had a response were followed over a 6-month period., Results: A total of 403 patients underwent randomization at five clinical sites; 200 patients were assigned to the ketamine group and 203 to the ECT group. After 38 patients had withdrawn before initiation of the assigned treatment, ketamine was administered to 195 patients and ECT to 170 patients. A total of 55.4% of the patients in the ketamine group and 41.2% of those in the ECT group had a response (difference, 14.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 3.9 to 24.2; P<0.001 for the noninferiority of ketamine to ECT). ECT appeared to be associated with a decrease in memory recall after 3 weeks of treatment (mean [±SE] decrease in the T-score for delayed recall on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, -0.9±1.1 in the ketamine group vs. -9.7±1.2 in the ECT group; scores range from -300 to 200, with higher scores indicating better function) with gradual recovery during follow-up. Improvement in patient-reported quality-of-life was similar in the two trial groups. ECT was associated with musculoskeletal adverse effects, whereas ketamine was associated with dissociation., Conclusions: Ketamine was noninferior to ECT as therapy for treatment-resistant major depression without psychosis. (Funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; ELEKT-D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03113968.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Symptoms of irritability, anxiety, panic, and insomnia are common in patients with depression, and their worsening after antidepressant treatment initiation is associated with poorer long-term outcomes. The Concise Associated Symptom Tracking (CAST) scale was developed to measure these symptoms in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). Here, we evaluate the psychometric properties of CAST in an ongoing community-based observational study involving children, adolescents, and young adults. Individuals from the ongoing Texas Youth Depression and Suicide Research Network (TX-YDSRN; N = 952) with CAST data available were included. Fit statistics [Goodness of Fit Index (GFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA)] from confirmatory factor analyses were used to evaluate the five- and four-domain structure of CAST. Item response theory (IRT) analyses were also used. Individuals were grouped based on age (in years) as youths (8-17) and young adults (18-20). Correlations with other clinical measures were used to inform construct validity. Four-domain (irritability, anxiety, panic, and insomnia) 12-item structure of CAST (CAST-12) was optimal for youths (N = 709, GFI = 0.906, CFI = 0.919, RMSEA = 0.095) and young adults (N = 243, GFI = 0.921, CFI = 0.938, RMSEA = 0.0797) with Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 and 0.88, respectively. Slope of each item exceeded 1.0 on IRT analyses suggesting adequate discrimination for each item. Scores on irritability, anxiety, panic, and insomnia were significantly correlated with similar items on other scales. Together these findings suggest that CAST-12 is a valid self-report measure of irritability, anxiety, insomnia, and panic in youths and young adults., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Jha has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus and Janssen Research & Development, educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network, consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc, Janssen Global Services, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Worldwide Clinical Trials/Eliem and Inversargo, and Guidepoint Global, and honoraria from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, and Global Medical Education. Dr. Blader reports having received consultant and speakers' honoraria from Supernus Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Brown has received consulting fees from Sage and Biogen Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Kennard receives royalties from Guilford, Press, Inc; and serves on the board of trustees for the Jerry M. Lewis, III, MD Research Foundation. Dr. Soutullo reports for the period 2018–2022 non-personal research funds from Lundbeck and Janssen; is a consultant/advisory board member of Editorial Médica Panamericana, EUNETHYDIS (European Network on Hyperkinetic Disorder), NeuroTech Solutions Ltd (Israel), Limbix Health DSMB (United States), MEDEA (Spain), Tech Innosphere Engineering LTD (Germany), and Shire/now part of Takeda (Spain); received speaker's bureau fees from Bial (Portugal), Cuquerella Medical Consulting (Spain), Medice (Germany), Rubio (Spain), Tecnofarma (Peru), and Shire/now part of Takeda (Spain), and royalties from Editorial Médica Panamericana (Spain). Dr. Storch reports receiving research funding to his institution from the Ream Foundation, International OCD Foundation, and NIH. He is a consultant for Brainsway and Biohaven Pharmaceuticals. He owns stock less than $5000 in NView. He receives book royalties from Elsevier, Wiley, Oxford, American Psychological Association, Guildford, Springer, and Jessica Kingsley. Dr. Trivedi has provided consulting services to Alkermes Inc, Axsome Therapeutics, Biogen MA Inc., Cerebral Inc., Circular Genomics Inc, Compass Pathfinder Limited, GH Research Limited, Heading Health Inc, Janssen, Legion Health Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc, Merck Sharp & Dhome LLC, Naki Health, Ltd., Neurocrine Biosciences Inc, Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc, Otsuka American Pharmaceutical Inc, Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization Inc, Praxis Precision Medicines Inc, SAGE Therapeutics, Sparian Biosciences Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, WebMD. He sits on the Scientific Advisory Board of Alto Neuroscience Inc, Cerebral Inc., Compass Pathfinder Limited, Heading Health, GreenLight VitalSign6 Inc, Legion Health Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, Orexo US Inc, Signant Health. He holds stock in Alto Neuroscience Inc, Cerebral Inc, Circular Genomics Inc, GreenLight VitalSign6 Inc, Legion Health Inc. Additionally, he has received editorial compensation from American Psychiatric Association, and Oxford University Press. Drs. Minhajuddin, Slater, Garza, Shotwell, Wakefield, and Mrs. Mayes have no declarations to report., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Alterations in the gut microbiome have been linked to a variety of mental illnesses including anxiety and depression. This study utilized advanced bioinformatics tools that integrated both the compositional and community nature of gut microbiota to investigate how gut microbiota influence clinical symptoms in a sample of participants with depression. Gut microbiota of 179 participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the Texas Resilience Against Depression (T-RAD) study were analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of stool samples. Severity of anxiety, depression, and anhedonia symptoms were assessed with General Anxiety Disorder - 7 item scale, Patient Health 9-item Questionnaire, and Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale, respectively. Using weighted correlation network analysis, a data-driven approach, three co-occurrence networks of bacterial taxa were identified. One of these co-occurrence networks was significantly associated with clinical features including depression and anxiety. The hub taxa associated with this co-occurrence module -one Ruminococcaceae family taxon, one Clostridiales vadinBB60 group family taxon, and one Christencenellaceae family taxon- were connected to several additional butyrate-producing bacteria suggesting that deficits in butyrate production may contribute to clinical symptoms. Therefore, by considering the community nature of the gut microbiome in a real world clinical sample, this study identified a gut microbial co-occurrence network that was significantly associated with clinical anxiety in a cohort of depressed individuals., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) may be associated with accelerated brain aging (higher brain age than chronological age). This report evaluated whether brain age is a clinically useful biomarker by checking its test-retest reliability using magnetic resonance imaging scans acquired 1 week apart and by evaluating the association of accelerated brain aging with symptom severity and antidepressant treatment outcomes., Methods: Brain age was estimated in participants of the EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care) study using T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MDD n = 290; female n = 192; healthy control participants n = 39; female n = 24). Intraclass correlation coefficient was used for baseline-to-week-1 test-retest reliability. Association of baseline Δ brain age (brain age minus chronological age) with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 and Concise Health Risk Tracking Self-Report domains (impulsivity, suicide propensity [measures: pessimism, helplessness, perceived lack of social support, and despair], and suicidal thoughts) were assessed at baseline (linear regression) and during 8-week-long treatment with either sertraline or placebo (repeated-measures mixed models)., Results: Mean ± SD baseline chronological age, brain age, and Δ brain age were 37.1 ± 13.3, 40.6 ± 13.1, and 3.1 ± 6.1 years in MDD and 37.1 ± 14.7, 38.4 ± 12.9, and 0.6 ± 5.5 years in healthy control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.98-1.00). Higher baseline Δ brain age in the MDD group was associated with higher baseline impulsivity and suicide propensity and predicted smaller baseline-to-week-8 reductions in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17, impulsivity, and suicide propensity with sertraline but not with placebo., Conclusions: Brain age is a reliable and potentially clinically useful biomarker that can prognosticate antidepressant treatment outcomes., (Copyright © 2022 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The suicide rate in youth and young adults continues to climb - we do not understand why this increase is occurring, nor do we have adequate tools to predict or prevent it. Increased efforts to treat underlying depression and other disorders that are highly associated with suicide have had limited impact, despite considerable financial investments in developing and disseminating available methods. Thus, there is a tremendous need to identify potential markers of suicide behavior for youth during this high-risk period., Methods: Funded by the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP), this study aims to map immune dysfunction to suicidal behavior and establish a reliable immune signature of suicide risk that can 1) guide future research into fundamental pathophysiology and 2) identify targets for drug development. The study design is an observational study where blood samples and a comprehensive array of clinical measures are collected from three groups of adolescents (n = 75 each) (1) with suicidal behavior [recent (within 3 months) suicide attempt or suicidal ideation warranting urgent evaluation,] (2) at risk for mood disorders, and (3) who are healthy (no psychiatric history). Participants will complete self-report and clinical assessments, along with a blood draw, at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, and online self-report assessments once a month., Results: The recruitment for this study is ongoing., Limitations: Observational, variability in treatment regimens., Conclusions: This study will help elucidate immune mechanisms that may play a causal role in suicide and serve as targets for future therapeutic development., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Dr. Jha has received contract research grants from Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus and Janssen Research & Development, educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network, consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc., Janssen Global Services, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Worldwide Clinical Trials/Eliem, and Guidepoint Global, and honoraria from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, and Global Medical Education. Dr. Emslie has received research support from Duke University (Pfizer), Forest Laboratories, Inc., and Janssen Research & Development, and he has been a consultant for Allergan, Assurex Health, Lundbeck, Neuronetics, Otsuka, and Pfizer Inc. Dr. Trivedi has served as a consultant or on an advisory board for Alkermes Inc., Alto Neuroscience Inc., Axsome Therapeutics, Boegringer Ingelheim, GH Research, GreenLight VitalSign6 Inc., Heading Health, inc., Janssen Pharmaceutical, Legion Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine Inc., Navitor, Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc., Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (MDD Section Advisor), SAGE Therapeutics, Signant Health, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc. He also receives editorial compensation from Oxford University Press. Drs. Chin Fatt, Ayvaci, Minhajuddin, Farrar, and Misses Gibson and Mayes have no financial disclosures to report., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

One in three adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not experience clinically significant improvement after multiple sequential courses of antidepressants and have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The presence of TRD contributes to the morbidity and excess mortality associated with MDD and has been linked to significantly increased health care expenses. In the absence of a consensus definition of TRD, this report takes a broad approach by considering inadequate response to one or more courses of antidepressants and focuses on atypical antipsychotics that are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of depression (aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, cariprazine, extended-release quetiapine, and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination). While multiple acute-phase studies have demonstrated the efficacy of these medications in improving depressive symptoms, clinically meaningful improvement (i.e., remission) remains limited, with significant concerns about side effects (including weight gain, metabolic dysfunction, extrapyramidal symptoms, and tardive dyskinesia), especially with long-term use. With the rapidly evolving landscape of antidepressant treatments over the past few years, which has witnessed approval of rapid-acting antidepressants (e.g., esketamine nasal spray and dextromethorphan-bupropion combination) and several more in the late-stage pipeline (e.g., zuranolone and psilocybin), it remains to be seen whether the use of atypical antipsychotics will go the way of the older and rarely prescribed antidepressants (such as tricyclics and monoamine oxidase inhibitors). Pragmatic clinical trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics with TRD-specific pharmacotherapies and neuromodulation treatments and to identify the optimal sequencing of these varied approaches for patients with MDD. When using atypical antipsychotics, clinicians and patients are encouraged to use a shared decision-making approach by personalizing treatment selection based on anticipated side effects, tolerability, cost, and feasibility.

Objectives: Evaluate whether early improvement in irritability predicts improvement in depression severity in a naturalistic sample of adolescents undergoing pharmacologic treatment for major depressive disorder., Methods: Adolescents (N = 161) aged 13-18 years with a moderate to severe depressive episode were enrolled. Outcome measures included the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R), Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-A 17 ), and Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI). Paired t-tests were used to estimate the change in irritability items from baseline to week-4, and Cohen's d effect sizes were computed. Separate linear regression analyses with CDRS-R, QIDS-A 17 , and CGI at week-8 as the dependent variables and baseline levels of irritability and baseline-to-week-4 changes in irritability as independent variables of interest were conducted. These analyses were repeated after controlling for overall depression severity (minus the irritability item) at baseline and baseline to week-4 change., Results: Greater baseline to week-4 reduction in irritability was associated with lower levels of CDRS-R, QIDS-A 17 , and CGI at week-8. These findings were significant for QIDS-A 17 and CGI even after controlling for baseline-to-week-4 changes in other depressive symptoms., Limitations: The single item evaluation of irritability reduced assessment reliability in the absence of validated measures of irritability., Conclusions: Early reduction in irritability is strongly associated with better outcomes in depressed youths, regardless of baseline depression severity. Further research is needed to quantify the burden of irritability, explore it as a tool for measurement-based care, and to develop targeted treatments for irritability., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Jennifer L. Vande Voort, M.D. reports equipment, drugs, or supplies was provided by Assurex Health Inc., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although insomnia is a common core symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD), the burden of moderate-to-severe insomnia symptoms in patients with MDD is not well-understood. This study quantified the clinical, patient-centric, and economic burden of adults with MDD with moderate-to-severe insomnia symptoms (MDDIS) compared to adults with MDD with no-to-mild insomnia symptoms (other-MDD) and adults without MDD., Methods: Data from 2019 US National Health and Wellness Survey identified adults self-reporting physician-diagnosed depression, stratified by insomnia status (MDDIS: Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] score ≥15; other-MDD: ISI score <15), and adults not reporting depression (non-MDD). Other-MDD and non-MDD were matched 2:1 to MDDIS on age/sex/race. Matched bivariate analyses examined differences in health-related outcomes by depression-insomnia status., Results: Of 74,994 survey respondents, 2045 (2.7%) were classified as MDDIS, 8220 (11.0%) as other-MDD, and 59,859 (79.8%) as non-MDD. MDDIS respondents (vs other-MDD and non-MDD) reported greater depression severity, anxiety severity, daytime sleepiness, activity impairment, direct costs, and costs due to work productivity impairments, and lower mental and physical functioning (all P < 0.05)., Limitations: Depression diagnosis was not based on clinical/diagnostic interview; causal relationships cannot be determined due to the cross-sectional design., Conclusions: Among US adults with MDD, presence of moderate-to-severe insomnia symptoms is associated with additional burden and notable impairments across several health outcomes versus those with MDD but no-to-minimal insomnia symptoms and general population without MDD. This study highlights the burden of MDDIS and the need for better identification and management of moderate-to-severe insomnia symptoms in adults with MDD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest K. Joshi and A. Pfau are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and own stock in Johnson & Johnson. M.J. Cambron-Mellott and H. Costantino are employees of Cerner Enviza, which received funding from Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, to conduct and report on the study. M.K. Jha has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Biosciences, Navitor/Supernus, and Janssen Research & Development; an educational grant to serve as section editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network; consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc., Janssen Global Services, Worldwide Clinical Trials/Eliem Therapeutics, and Guidepoint; and honoraria from the North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, WebMD/Medscape, and Global Medical Education. Dr. Jha did not receive any honoraria/payments for work presented here., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: To address the clinical heterogeneity of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), this investigation determined whether resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) could be deployed to identify circuit based homogeneous subgroups, and whether subgroups identified show differential treatment outcomes., Methods: Pretreatment resting state fMRIs obtained from 278 outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD from Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care for Depression Study were used to create data-driven subgroups using CLICK clustering. These subgroups were then compared using baseline clinical data, as well as baseline-to-week 8 changes in depression severity measured using the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD 17 ) and response/remission rates by treatment group., Results: Three subgroups were identified. Cluster-1 was characterized by overallhyperconnectivity coupled with profound hypoconnectivity between the supramarginal gyrus (executive control network; ECN) and the superior frontal cortex (dorsal attention network; DAN). Cluster-2 was characterized by overall hypoconnectivity coupled with hyperconnectivity between supramarginal gyrus (ECN) and superior frontal cortex (DAN). Cluster-3 showed hypoconnectivity, especially profound between the angular cortex (default mode network; DMN) and middle frontal cortex (ECN). While baseline clinical measures did not differentiate the three clusters, Cluster-3 had the remission rate (51.6%) compared to Cluster-1 and Cluster-2 (32.7% and 31.9%) when treated with sertraline., Limitations: Due to the exploratory nature of these analyses, there were no adjustments for multiple comparisons., Conclusions: Baseline functional connectivity can be used to subgroup patients with MDD that differ in acute phase treatment outcomes. Measures of connectivity may address the heterogeneity of MDD., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate the impact of baseline irritability on clinical outcomes in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treated with fixed or flexible doses of esketamine nasal spray plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant (ESK+AD) and to explore whether treatment with ESK affects irritability symptoms over time., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from two 4-week, double-blind, phase 3 studies: TRANSFORM-1 (NCT02417064) and TRANSFORM-2 (NCT02418585). Adults with TRD (n = 560) were randomly assigned to ESK+AD or placebo nasal spray plus oral antidepressant (AD+PBO). Irritability was assessed with Item 6 of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale at screening and baseline. Changes in depression severity (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] total score) were evaluated by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. Rates of MADRS response (≥50 % decrease from baseline total score) and remission (total score ≤ 12) were examined using multiple logistic regression models., Results: Of 560 participants with TRD, 52.9 %, 23.2 %, and 23.9 % had high, low, and varying levels of irritability, respectively. No significant interaction between baseline irritability and treatment group was observed for change in MADRS total score, treatment response, or remission at day 28; numerically greater improvement was observed on all outcomes with ESK+AD versus AD+PBO at day 28 regardless of baseline irritability level. Percentages of patients reporting adverse events were similar across the three baseline irritability groups., Limitations: TRANSFORM-1 and TRANSFORM-2 were not designed to prospectively evaluate predetermined irritability outcomes., Conclusions: These post hoc results support efficacy of ESK+AD in patients with TRD, regardless of baseline irritability., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02417064 (TRANSFORM-1), NCT02418585 (TRANSFORM-2)., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Drs. Magharehabed and Turkoz are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC (Dr. Magharehabed), and Janssen Research & Development, LLC (Dr. Turkoz), and hold stock in Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Drs. Williamson and Daly were employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, when the study was conducted and hold stock in Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Dr. Jha has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research & Development; an educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network; consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc., Janssen Global Services, and Guidepoint Global; and honoraria from the North American Center for Continuing Medical Education and Global Medical Education. Dr. Trivedi has served as a consultant or advisor for Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alkermes Inc., Alto Neuroscience Inc., Axsome Therapeutics, GH Research Limited, GreenLight VitalSign6 Inc.; Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc., Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Orexo US Inc., Otsuka, SAGE Therapeutics, Signant Health, and Titan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., has conducted research for NIMH, NIDA, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT); and receives editorial compensation from Oxford University Press., (Copyright © 2022 Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Burden of psychiatric disorders is compounded by their wide prevalence as well as the limited efficacy of currently available treatments and the current approaches for prescribing these treatments. The selection of treatments continues to be subjective and often results in a trial-and-error approach. Emerging research suggests that biological markers (or biomarkers) can be used to develop precision medicine approaches for psychiatric disorders. Furthermore, the biomarkers also promise to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms which in turn can be used to develop novel therapeutic treatments. In this chapter we have focused on mood disorders and reviewed studies on electroencephalography (EEG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and blood-based biomarkers that can guide selection of one treatment versus another (treatment-selection biomarker) as well as biomarkers that can guide the development of novel therapeutics. These studies suggest that the use of objective physiological data is poised to alter the landscape of psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. However, practical and economic barriers remain as major hurdles. The key to finding such translational diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers is a better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, and despite the tremendous advances in neuroscience, it is clear there remains much left to be elucidated., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objective: Rapid-acting treatment options are needed for major depressive disorder (MDD). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the magnitude of the treatment effect for intranasal esketamine over placebo at 24 hours after the first dose and at endpoint., Data Sources: PubMed, abstracts of major psychiatric meetings, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to November 2020 with no language constraints, cross-referencing the term intranasal with esketamine and randomized ., Study Selection: Of 27 studies reviewed, 8 articles, with a total of 1,437 patients with MDD, met study criteria and were included in the meta-analysis., Data Extraction: Randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing adjunctive treatment of standard antidepressants with intranasal esketamine for MDD, using intranasal placebo augmentation as a comparator, were selected., Results: Estimates of the standardized mean difference (SMD) in change scores were pooled after examining for homogeneity using the test statistic proposed by DerSimonian and Laird. Findings of the random effects model were presented. Augmentation of standard antidepressants with intranasal esketamine resulted in greater Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score reduction than adjunctive intranasal placebo at 24 hours. Across the trials, the SMD was 0.34 (95% CI = 0.11 to 0.46, P  < .0001) with a 2.9-point greater mean MADRS score reduction following intranasal esketamine versus active control plus intranasal saline. A similar finding was evident at endpoint., Conclusions: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis found that augmentation of antidepressants with intranasal esketamine was statistically and clinically more effective in reducing depression severity than augmentation with placebo, at both 24 hours and study endpoint. Future studies are needed to evaluate dose-response relationship for esketamine., (© Copyright 2022 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Background: Stress exposure is a key risk factor for the development of major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Enhancing stress resilience in at-risk populations could potentially protect against stress-induced disorders. The administration of ketamine one week prior to an acute stressor prevents the development of stress-induced depressive-like behavior in rodents. This study aimed to test if the prophylactic effect of ketamine against stress also applies to humans., Methods: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study wherein 24 healthy subjects (n = 11 males) were randomized to receive either ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.045 mg/kg) intravenously one week prior to an acute stress [Trier Social Stress Test (TSST)]. The primary endpoint was the anxious-composed subscale of the Profile of Mood States Bipolar Scale (POMS-Bi) administered immediately after the TSST. Salivary and plasma cortisol and salivary alpha amylase were also measured at 15-min intervals for 60 min following the stressor, as proxies of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) and sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axis activity, respectively., Results: Compared to the midazolam group (n = 12), the ketamine group (n = 12) showed a moderate to large (Cohen's d = 0.7) reduction in levels of anxiety immediately following stress, although this was not significant (p = 0.06). There was no effect of group on change in salivary cortisol or salivary alpha amylase following stress. We conducted a secondary analysis excluding one participant who did not show an expected correlation between plasma and salivary cortisol (n = 23, ketamine n = 11). In this subgroup, we observed a significant reduction in the level of salivary alpha amylase in the ketamine group compared to midazolam (Cohen's d = 0.7, p = 0.03). No formal adjustment for multiple testing was made as this is a pilot study and all secondary analyses are considered hypothesis-generating., Conclusions: Ketamine was associated with a numeric reduction in TSST-induced anxiety, equivalent to a medium-to-large effect size. However, this did not reach statistical significance . In a subset of subjects, ketamine appeared to blunt SAM reactivity following an acute stressor. Future studies with larger sample size are required to further investigate the pro-resilient effect of ketamine., Competing Interests: Dr. Dennis Charney (Dean of Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai) is a named co-inventor on several issued U.S. patents, and several pending U.S. patent applications filed by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) related to pharmacologic therapy for treatment-resistant depression, suicidal ideation and other disorders. ISMMS has entered into a licensing agreement with Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and it has and will receive payments from Janssen under the license agreement related to these patents. As a co-inventor, Dr. Charney is entitled to a portion of the payments received by the ISMMS. Since SPRAVATO (esketamine) has received regulatory approval for treatment-resistant depression, ISMMS and Dr. Charney as its employee and a co-inventor, will be entitled to additional payments, under the license agreement. Drs. Charney and Feder are named co-inventors on an issued patent in the United States and several issued patents outside of the United States, filed by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai for the use of ketamine as therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder; this intellectual property has not been licensed. Dr. Costi has provided consultation services for Guidepoint and TCG Crossover. Dr. Jha has received contract research grants from 10.13039/100014387Acadia Pharmaceuticals, 10.13039/100014593Neurocrine Bioscience, Navitor/Supernus and 10.13039/100005205Janssen Research & Development, educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network, consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc, Janssen Global Services, Janssen Scientific Affairs, Worldwide Clinical Trials/Eliem, and Guidepoint Global, and honoraria from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, Medscape/WebMD, Clinical Care Options, and Global Medical Education. Dr. Matthew Klein is currently a full-time employee of Janssen Research & Development. Dr. Klein conducted all work related to this manuscript during his previous position as a full-time employee of the ISMMS. In the past 5 years, Dr. Murrough has provided consultation services and/or served on advisory boards for Boehreinger Ingelheim, Clexio Biosciences, FSV7, Global Medical Education (GME), Otsuka, and Sage Therapeutics. Dr. Murrough is named on a patent pending for neuropeptide Y as a treatment for mood and anxiety disorders and on a patent pending for the use of ezogabine and other KCNQ channel openers to treat depression and related conditions. All the other authors report no conflict of interest., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Ketamine is a novel and rapidly acting treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). Benzodiazepines are commonly coprescribed with antidepressants in MDD. This study sought to examine data from a randomized clinical trial that compared a single infusion of intravenous (IV) ketamine to midazolam placebo in treatment-resistant depression ( DSM-IV-TR MDD) and to assess whether the use of concomitant oral benzodiazepines differentially affected treatment response to ketamine versus midazolam., Methods: This trial ran from December 2015 to December 2016. Subjects who were taking oral benzodiazepines (n = 44) were compared to those who were not (n = 55). A significant treatment-by-benzodiazepine effect could be interpreted as a possible moderator of differential treatment response to ketamine versus midazolam. Benzodiazepine use was examined as both a binary and a continuous predictor, to assess the impact of dosage., Results: Benzodiazepine users did not differ from non-users on the original study's primary outcome measure, score on the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-6), at baseline, but the former had more severe anxiety. When oral benzodiazepine use was modeled as a binary predictor, benzodiazepine use did not impact differential treatment response. However, when benzodiazepine dosage was considered, there was a significant impact of benzodiazepine use on differential treatment response. Oral benzodiazepines significantly impacted HDRS-6 ( P  = .018) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S; P  = .008) scores at day 1 (24 hours post treatment); effects were nonsignificant for all day 3 outcomes. Among ketamine subjects, higher doses of benzodiazepines were associated with less improvement in depression scores at day 1., Conclusions: Concomitant oral benzodiazepines at higher doses may attenuate the antidepressant effects of IV ketamine at day 1 but not day 3 post-infusion., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01920555., (© Copyright 2022 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Background: Diabetes has been linked to accelerated brain aging, i.e., neuroimaging-predicted age of brain is higher than chronological age. This report evaluated whether accelerated brain aging in diabetes is associated with higher levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and increased mortality., Methods: Brain age in Dallas Heart Study (n = 1949) was estimated using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and a previously-published Gaussian Processes Regression model. Accelerated brain aging (adjusted Δ brain age) was computed as follows: (brain age adjusted for chronological age)-minus-(chronological age). Mortality data until 12/31/2016 were obtained from the National Death Index. Associations of adjusted Δ brain age with diabetes in full sample and with HbA1c in individuals with diabetes were evaluated. Proportion of association between diabetes and all-cause mortality that was accounted for by adjusted Δ brain age were evaluated with mediation analyses. Covariates included Framingham 10-year risk score, race/ethnicity, income, body mass index, and history of myocardial infarction., Results: Diabetes was associated with] higher adjusted Δ brain age [estimate= 1.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.889, 2.68]. Among those with diabetes, higher HbA1c (log-base-2-transformed) was associated with higher adjusted Δ brain age (estimate=3.88; 95% CI: 1.47, 6.30). Over a median follow-up of 97.5 months, 24/246 (9.8%) with diabetes and 63/1703 (3.7%) without diabetes died. Adjusted Δ brain age accounted for 65.3 (95% CI: 39.3, 100.0)% of the association between diabetes and all-cause mortality., Conclusion: Accelerated brain aging may be related to poor glycemic control in diabetes and partly account for the association between diabetes and all-cause mortality., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: To address the need to identify potential markers of suicide behavior for adolescents (ages 12-18 years), mass cytometry was used to explore the cellular mechanisms that may underpin immune dysregulation in adolescents with recent suicidal behavior., Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples from 10 female adolescents with a recent suicide attempt and 4 healthy female adolescents were used. A panel of 30 antibodies was analyzed using mass cytometry. We used two complementary approaches to 1) identify the cell types that significantly differed between the two groups, and 2) explore differences in the expression profile of markers on the surface of these cells. Mass cytometry data were investigated using (Center for Disease Control, 2021) Opt-SNE for dimension reduced (Curtin and Heron, 2019), FlowSOM for clustering, and (Bridge et al., 2006) EgdeR and SAM for statistical analyses., Results: Opt-SNE (a data driven clustering analysis) identified 15 clusters of distinct cell types. From these 15 clusters, cluster 5 (classical monocytes) had statistically lower abundance in suicidal adolescents as compared to healthy controls, whereas cluster 7 (gamma-delta T cells) had statistically higher abundance in suicidal adolescents compared to healthy control. Furthermore, across the 15 cell types, chemokine receptors, CXCR3 (cluster 5) and CXCR5 (clusters 4, 5, 7, and 9), had an elevated expression profile in those with a recent suicide attempt versus healthy controls., Conclusion: This report demonstrates the utility of high dimensional cell phenotyping in psychiatric disorders and provides preliminary evidence for distinct immune dysfunctions in adolescents with recent suicide attempts as compared to healthy controls., Competing Interests: Dr. Trivedi has served as a consultant or advisor for Alkermes Inc., Alto Neuroscience Inc, Axsome Therapeutics, Boegringer Ingelheim, GH Research, GreenLight VitalSign6 Inc, Heading Health, inc., Janssen Pharmaceutical, Legion Health, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mind Medicine Inc., Navitor, Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., Noema Pharma AG, Orexo US Inc., Otsuka Canada Pharmaceutical Inc, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc. (MDD Section Advisor), SAGE Therapeutics, Signant Health, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc. He receives editorial compensation from Oxford University Press. Dr. Jha has received contract research grants from Acadia Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research & Development, educational grant to serve as Section Editor of the Psychiatry & Behavioral Health Learning Network, consultant fees from Eleusis Therapeutics US, Inc, and honoraria for CME presentations from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education and Global Medical Education. Dr. Foster has served on the Scientific Advisory Board for MRM Health NL and has received consulting/speaker fees from Klaire Labs, Takeda Canada and Rothman, Benson, Hedges Inc. Dr. Chin Fatt, Dr. Farrar, Dr. Minhajuddin, and Mrs. Mayes have no conflicts of interest to report., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The brain circuitry of depression and anxiety/fear is well-established, involving regions such as the limbic system and prefrontal cortex. We expand prior literature by examining the extent to which four discrete factors of anxiety (immediate state anxiety, physiological/panic, neuroticism/worry, and agitation/restlessness) among depressed outpatients are associated with differential responses during reactivity to and regulation of emotional conflict., Methods: A total of 172 subjects diagnosed with major depressive disorder underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing an Emotional Stroop Task. Two main contrasts were examined using whole brain voxel wise analyses: emotional reactivity and emotion regulation. We also evaluated the association of these contrasts with the four aforementioned anxiety factors., Results: During emotional reactivity, participants with higher immediate state anxiety showed potentiated activation in the rolandic operculum and insula, while individuals with higher levels of physiological/panic demonstrated decreased activation in the posterior cingulate. No significant results emerged for any of the four factors on emotion regulation. When re-analyzing these statistically-significant brain regions through analyses of a subsample with (n = 92) and without (n = 80) a current anxiety disorder, no significant associations occurred among those without an anxiety disorder. Among those with an anxiety disorder, results were similar to the full sample, except the posterior cingulate was associated with the neuroticism/worry factor., Conclusions: Divergent patterns of task-related brain activation across four discrete anxiety factors could be used to inform treatment decisions and target specific aspects of anxiety that involve intrinsic processing to attenuate overactive responses to emotional stimuli., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The lack of biomarkers to inform antidepressant selection is a key challenge in personalized depression treatment. This work identifies candidate biomarkers by building deep learning predictors of individual treatment outcomes using reward processing measures from functional magnetic resonance imaging, clinical assessments, and demographics., Methods: Participants in the EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care) study (n = 222) underwent reward processing task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and were randomized to 8 weeks of sertraline (n = 106) or placebo (n = 116). Subsequently, sertraline nonresponders (n = 37) switched to 8 weeks of bupropion. The change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was measured after treatment. Reward processing, clinical measurements, and demographics were used to train treatment-specific deep learning models., Results: The predictive model for sertraline achieved R 2 of 48% (95% CI, 33%-61%; p < 10 -3 ) in predicting the change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 4.86 participants in predicting response. The placebo model achieved R 2 of 28% (95% CI, 15%-42%; p < 10 -3 ) and NNT of 2.95 in predicting response. The bupropion model achieved R 2 of 34% (95% CI, 10%-59%, p < 10 -3 ) and NNT of 1.68 in predicting response. Brain regions where reward processing activity was predictive included the prefrontal cortex and cerebellar crus 1 for sertraline and the cingulate cortex, caudate, orbitofrontal cortex, and crus 1 for bupropion., Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the utility of reward processing measurements and deep learning to predict antidepressant outcomes and to form multimodal treatment biomarkers., (Copyright © 2021 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent studies have suggested that mitochondrial dysfunction and dysregulated neuroinflammatory pathways are involved in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). Here, we aimed to assess the differences in markers of mitochondrial dynamics, mitophagy, general autophagy, and apoptosis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of MDD patients (n = 77) and healthy controls (HCs, n = 24). Moreover, we studied inflammation engagement as a moderator of mitochondria dysfunctions on the severity of depressive symptoms. We found increased levels of Mfn-2 (p < 0.001), short Opa-1 (S-Opa-1) (p < 0.001) and Fis-1 (p < 0.001) in MDD patients, suggesting an increase in the mitochondrial fragmentation. We also found that MDD patients had higher levels of Pink-1 (p < 0.001), p62/SQSTM1 (p < 0.001), LC3B (p = 0.002), and caspase-3 active (p = 0.001), and lower levels of parkin (p < 0.001) compared with HCs. Moreover, we showed that that MDD patients with higher CRP levels had higher levels of Mfn-2 (p = 0.001) and LC3B (p = 0.002) when compared with MDD patients with low CRP. Another notable finding was that the severity of depressive symptoms in MDD is associated with changes in protein levels in pathways related to mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy, and can be dependent on the inflammatory status. Overall, our study demonstrated that a disruption in the mitochondrial dynamics network could initiate a cascade of abnormal changes relevant to the critical pathological changes during the course of MDD and lead to poor outcomes., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is a key regulator of metabolic function and nutrient preference. It also affects biological pathways associated with major depressive disorder (MDD), including corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH), leptin, and sympathetic activity. Lower levels of cerebrospinal fluid FGF21 have been associated with higher Beck Depression Inventory scores. FGF21 was examined as a metabolic marker that could be associated with MDD and evaluated as a biomarker of antidepressant treatment response in a large, randomized placebo-controlled trial in chronic, early-onset MDD participants. FGF21 levels at baseline and during treatment were determined for participants in the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care (EMBARC) study. FGF21 was analyzed by ELISA in individuals with chronic, early-onset MDD (first major depressive episode before 30 years) compared to healthy control participants. Participants with MDD had higher levels of FGF21 compared to healthy controls (HCs), even after controlling for baseline age, sex, race, Hispanic ethnicity, BMI, and site (β-coefficient = 1.20, p < 0.0001, Cohen's d = 0.60). FGF21 did not change over time nor differ between treatment groups. Interestingly though, those with normal BMI and lower FGF21 levels showed a reduction in depression severity over time compared to all other groups. In conclusion, depression is associated with higher levels of FGF21 compared to healthy controls and those with lower levels of FGF21 (25th percentile of the sample) in the context of normal-weight BMI seem to have improved depression severity over time., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This report from VitalSign 6 project describes treatment selection, follow-up rates and remission outcomes by initial depression severity using the PCP-FIRST model., Methods: This retrospective analysis included 32,106 patients aged ≥12 years screened with the Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item (PHQ-2) from November 2016 to July 2019 across 37 primary care clinics. PHQ-2 positive-screen patients (PHQ-2 ≥ 3) received 9-item PHQ (PHQ-9) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scales, clinician assessments, and evaluation for pharmacotherapy management with measurement-based care (MBC)., Results: Of PHQ-2 screened patients, 18.7% (5994/32,106) were positive and received a PHQ-9. Of 5994 patients with PHQ-9, 2571 received a clinical diagnosis of depression of whom, 333 had none-mild depression (PHQ-9 < 10) and 2238 had moderate-severe depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Of the 333 patients with none-mild depression and 2238 patients with moderate-severe depression, 266 and 1929 had at least 18 weeks of data available. Of these, 54.9% (146/266) with none-mild depression and 69.1% (1332/1929) with moderate-severe depression were started on pharmacotherapy. Of the 1478 patients with clinical diagnosis of depression, initiated on pharmacotherapy, 1046 returned for ≥1 follow-up and 616 returned for ≥3 follow-ups over 18 weeks. Of the 1046 patients with ≥1 follow-up visit within 18 weeks, remission rates for patients with mild depression, moderate-severe depression, and overall were 55.6% (66/99), 30% (282/941), and 32.4% (338/1040) respectively., Conclusions: Despite this being a real-world, usual care sample, remission outcomes exceed real world remission rate expectations of 6% in primary care., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Promising initial data indicate that the glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine may be beneficial in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Here, we explore the neural correlates of ketamine-related changes in PTSD symptoms, using a rich battery of functional imaging data (two emotion-processing tasks and one task-free scan), collected from a subset of participants of a randomized clinical trial of repeated-dose intravenous ketamine vs midazolam (total N = 21). In a pre-registered analysis, we tested whether changes in an a priori set of imaging measures from a target neural circuit were predictive of improvement in PTSD symptoms, using leave-one-out cross-validated elastic-net regression models (regions of interest in the target circuit consisted of the dorsal and rostral anterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, anterior hippocampus, anterior insula, and amygdala). Improvements in PTSD severity were associated with increased functional connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) and amygdala during emotional face-viewing (change score retained in model with minimum predictive error in left-out subjects, standardized regression coefficient [β] = 2.90). This effect was stronger in participants who received ketamine compared to midazolam (interaction β = 0.86), and persisted following inclusion of concomitant change in depressive symptoms in the analysis model (β = 0.69). Improvement following ketamine was also predicted by decreased dorsal anterior cingulate activity during emotional conflict regulation, and increased task-free connectivity between the vmPFC and anterior insula (βs = -2.82, 0.60). Exploratory follow-up analysis via dynamic causal modelling revealed that whilst improvement in PTSD symptoms following either drug was associated with decreased excitatory modulation of amygdala→vmPFC connectivity during emotional face-viewing, increased top-down inhibition of the amygdala by the vmPFC was only observed in participants who improved under ketamine. Individuals with low prefrontal inhibition of amygdala responses to faces at baseline also showed greater improvements following ketamine treatment. These preliminary findings suggest that, specifically under ketamine, improvements in PTSD symptoms are accompanied by normalization of hypofrontal control over amygdala responses to social signals of threat., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American College of Neuropsychopharmacology.)

Deaths due to suicide are one of the leading causes of mortality among youths and young adults. Active suicidal ideation (SI) is considered one of the strongest risk factors for suicide. Here, we evaluated the neurocircuitry of SI in a sample of youths and young adults (aged 10-26 years) with current or past diagnosis of either major depression or bipolar disorder who were enrolled in Texas Resilience Against Depression Study (T-RAD), and had neuroimaging and SI (assessed with the 3-item Suicidal Thoughts factor of Concise Health Risk Tracking self-report scale) data available (n = 72, 53 females). Resting-state functional connectivity (FC) was computed amongst 121 cortical and subcortical regions of interest resulting in 7260 FC pairs. Mean (SD) age and SI levels of participants were 19.6 years (4.01) and 1.48 (2.36) respectively. In univariate analyses, 34 out of the 7260 FC pairs were correlated with SI (p < .005). Stronger connectivity of default mode network (DMN) with striatum was associated with higher SI. Conversely, higher SI was associated with weaker connectivity of limbic network with hippocampus, DMN, dorsal attention network, and executive control network. In multivariate analyses, these 34 FC pairs together had an average correlation of 0.54 after five-fold cross-validation. In conclusion, SI was associated with distinct patterns of resting-state functional connectivity among youths and young adults with regions in DMN and the ventral striatum as key nodes., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The habenula-pancreas axis regulates the stimulatory effects of nicotine on blood glucose levels and may participate in the emergence of type 2 diabetes in human tobacco smokers. This secondary analysis of young adults from the Human Connectome Project (HCP-YA) evaluated whether smoking status links the relationship between habenular volume and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), a marker of long-term glycemic control., Methods: Habenula segmentation was performed using a fully-automated myelin content-based approach in HCP-YA participants and the results were inspected visually (n = 693; aged 22-37 years). A linear regression analysis was used with habenular volume as the dependent variable, the smoking-by-HbA1c interaction as the independent variable of interest, and age, gender, race, ethnicity, education, income, employment status, body mass index, and total gray matter volume as covariates., Results: Habenula volume and HbA1c were similar in smokers and nonsmokers. There was a significant interaction effect (F (1, 673) = 5.03, p = 0.025) indicating that habenular volume was related to HbA1c in a manner that depended on smoking status. Among participants who were smokers (n = 120), higher HbA1c was associated with apparently larger habenular volume (β = 6.74, standard error=2.36, p = 0.005). No such association between habenular volume and HbA1c was noted among participants who were nonsmokers (n = 573)., Discussion: Blood glucose levels over an extended time period, reflected by HbA1c, were correlated with habenular volume in smokers, consistent with a relationship between the habenula and blood glucose homeostasis in smokers. Future studies are needed to evaluate how habenular function relates to glycemic control in smokers and nonsmokers., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: This report evaluated whether irritability in adults with stimulant use disorder is associated with suicidal ideation (SI) at the same visit (i.e., concurrently) and whether early changes in irritability predict subsequent levels of SI., Methods: Adults with stimulant use disorder (n=302) from nine residential addiction treatment programs were included. Participants were randomized to augmentation of usual care with dosed exercise or health education intervention. Irritability, SI, and depression were measured every week with 5-item irritability domain of Concise Associated Symptom Tracking scale, 3-item suicidal thoughts factor of Concise Health Risk Tracking scale, and 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician-Rated version (excluding the suicide-related item) respectively during acute-(baseline-to-week-12) and continuation-(week-12-to-week-36) phase. Covariates included age, sex, race, ethnicity, treatment arm, type of substance(s) used, and comorbid psychiatric and medical disorders., Results: Higher irritability was associated with higher SI concurrently both in the acute-phase: r=0.28 (p<0.0001) and in the continuation-phase: r=0.33 (p<0.0001). Irritability was associated with concurrent SI after controlling for depression [acute-phase: β=0.17 (p<0.0001); continuation-phase: β=0.18 (p<0.0001)]. Greater baseline-to-week-2 reductions in irritability predicted lower levels of SI from week-2-to-week-12 (β=-0.11, p=0.003) and from week-12-to-week-36 (β=-0.22, p<0.0001) after controlling for baseline levels of depression and SI and baseline-to-week-2 changes in depression and SI., Limitations: Secondary analyses, self-report measures of irritability and SI, limited generalizability., Conclusions: Irritability is associated with SI concurrently, and greater reductions in irritability earlier in treatment are associated with lower levels of subsequent SI. Therefore, targeting irritability may reduce suicidality in adults with stimulant use disorder., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Sociotropy and autonomy are cognitive-personality styles that have been hypothesized to confer vulnerability to different presentations of major depressive disorder (MDD), which may respond differentially to treatment. Specifically, the profile of low sociotropy and high autonomy is hypothesized to indicate a positive response to antidepressant medication. The current study examines sociotropy and autonomy in relation to sertraline treatment response in individuals with MDD. As part of an ancillary study to the larger Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care (EMBARC) project, individuals with MDD participated in an 8-week trial of sertraline and completed a self-report questionnaire of sociotropy and autonomy. Discriminant function analyses were used to examine whether sociotropy and autonomy scores could distinguish antidepressant treatment responders (determined by a 50% or greater reduction in depressive symptoms) from non-responders. The sociotropy scale successfully discriminated sertraline treatment responders from non-responders. Further, lower sociotropy was associated with greater improvements in depressive symptomology following sertraline treatment. The current findings suggest individuals with MDD characterized by low sociotropy are more likely to benefit from sertraline. Given the promising results of the Sociotropy-Autonomy Scale in discriminating treatment responders from non-responders, the low resources necessary for administration, and the ease of translation into routine clinical care, the scale warrants further research attention., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis of studies of vortioxetine in adults with major depressive disorder (MDD)., Data Sources: Abstracts were identified using PubMed by cross-referencing vortioxetine with placebo and randomize d. No language or publication year restrictions were used., Study Selection: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials comparing oral vortioxetine monotherapy with placebo for acute treatment of MDD., Data Extraction: Data were extracted with a pre-coded form, as follows: number of patients randomized, treatment group, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) response and remission rates, and mean change in scores from baseline and standard errors for the MADRS, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)., Results: 7,269 subjects randomized to vortioxetine (n = 3,630) or placebo (n = 3,639) from 17 studies were included. The probability of receiving placebo did not predict difference in change in MADRS scores between vortioxetine and placebo (estimate = 4.1, P  = .54). The standardized mean difference (SMD) (95% CI) for change in MADRS score for vortioxetine overall versus placebo was 0.33 (0.24 to 0.41) and was 0.24 (0.08 to 0.39), 0.33 (0.19 to 0.47), 0.26 (-0.06 to 0.58), and 0.44 (0.27 to 0.62) for 5-mg, 10-mg, 15-mg, and 20-mg doses, respectively. Greater difference in efficacy between drug and placebo was observed in studies with a low rather than a high placebo response rate., Conclusions: Vortioxetine is more effective than placebo in improving depression, anxiety, and cognition. Less informative or uninformative studies obscured the true treatment effect., (© Copyright 2021 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Background: This report tests the association of self-reported symptoms of irritability with overt behavior of anger attacks (uncharacteristic sudden bouts of anger that are disproportionate to situation and associated with autonomic activation)., Methods: Participants of the Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care study who completed Massachusetts General Hospital Anger Attacks questionnaire were included ( n = 293). At each visit, the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the 16-item Concise Associated Symptom Tracking scale were used to measure depression, anxiety, and irritability. In those with anger attacks present v. those without anger attacks, separate t tests and mixed model analyses compared afore-mentioned symptoms at baseline and changes with treatment respectively. As anger attacks may occur without aggressive behaviors, analyses were repeated based only on the presence of aggressive behaviors., Results: At baseline, those with anger attacks ( n = 109) v. those without anger attacks ( n = 184) had similar levels of depression but higher levels of irritability [effect size ( d ) = 0.80] and anxiety ( d = 0.32). With acute-phase treatment, participants with anger attacks experienced a greater reduction in irritability ( p < 0.001) but not in depression ( p = 0.813) or anxiety ( p = 0.771) as compared to those without anger attacks. Yet, irritability levels at week-8 were higher in those with anger attacks ( d = 0.32) than those without anger attacks. Similar results were found in participants with aggressive behaviors., Conclusions: The presence of anger attacks in outpatients with major depressive disorder may identify a sub-group of patients with persistently elevated irritability.

Objective: Preclinical studies point to the KCNQ2/3 potassium channel as a novel target for the treatment of depression and anhedonia, a reduced ability to experience pleasure. The authors conducted the first randomized placebo-controlled trial testing the effect of the KCNQ2/3 positive modulator ezogabine on reward circuit activity and clinical outcomes in patients with depression., Methods: Depressed individuals (N=45) with elevated levels of anhedonia were assigned to a 5-week treatment period with ezogabine (900 mg/day; N=21) or placebo (N=24). Participants underwent functional MRI during a reward flanker task at baseline and following treatment. Clinical measures of depression and anhedonia were collected at weekly visits. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 5 in ventral striatum activation during reward anticipation. Secondary endpoints included depression and anhedonia severity as measured using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), respectively., Results: The study did not meet its primary neuroimaging endpoint. Participants in the ezogabine group showed a numerical increase in ventral striatum response to reward anticipation following treatment compared with participants in the placebo group from baseline to week 5. Compared with placebo, ezogabine was associated with a significantly larger improvement in MADRS and SHAPS scores and other clinical endpoints. Ezogabine was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events occurred., Conclusions: The study did not meet its primary neuroimaging endpoint, although the effect of treatment was significant on several secondary clinical endpoints. In aggregate, the findings may suggest that future studies of the KCNQ2/3 channel as a novel treatment target for depression and anhedonia are warranted.

Objective: The aim of this report was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Pain Frequency, Intensity, and Burden Scale (P-FIBS), a brief measure of pain, as well as the association of pain with irritability and depression and how these symptoms relate to functional impairments., Methods: Participants of 2 randomized controlled trials (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care [EMBARC; n = 251 with DSM-IV diagnosis of major depressive disorder; study duration: August 2011-December 2015] and STimulant Reduction Intervention Using Dosed Exercise [STRIDE; n = 302 with DSM-IV diagnosis of stimulant abuse or dependence; study-duration: July 2010-February 2013]) and treatment-seeking patients in primary care clinics from an ongoing quality-improvement project (VitalSign 6 ; n = 4,370; project duration: August 2014-July 2019) were included. Psychometric properties of the P-FIBS were evaluated with confirmatory factor and item response theory analyses in EMBARC and VitalSign 6 . The approach of Baron and Kenny was used to assess whether irritability accounted for the effect of pain on depression., Results: Cronbach α (0.84-0.89) and model fits for single-factor structure of P-FIBS were acceptable. Pain was positively correlated with irritability (r = 0.22-0.29) and depression (r = 0.10-0.33). Irritability accounted for 40.7%-65.5% of the effect of pain on depression. Higher irritability and depression were associated with poorer social functioning, quality of life, and productivity in work- and non-work-related activities. Pain was associated with non-work-related activity impairments even after controlling for irritability and depression., Conclusions: The P-FIBS is a brief and reliable measure of pain. Irritability is associated with pain and accounts for a large proportion of the effect of pain on depression. Symptoms of pain, irritability, and depression are associated with functional impairments., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01407094 (EMBARC), NCT01141608 (STRIDE)., (© Copyright 2021 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: To identify data-driven subgroups in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in order to elucidate underlying neural correlates and determine if these subgroups have utility in predicting response to antidepressant versus placebo., Methods: Using 27 clinical measures at baseline of Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care for Depression (EMBARC) study, participants with MDD (n=244) were sub grouped using principal component (PC) analysis. Baseline-to-week-8 changes in depression severity with sertraline versus placebo were compared in these subgroups. Resting-state functional connectivity of these subgroups were compared to those of healthy controls (n=38)., Results: Eight subgroups were identified from four PCs: (PC1) severity of depression-associated symptoms, (PC2) sub-threshold mania and anhedonia, (PC3) childhood trauma, medical comorbidities, and sexual dysfunction, and (PC4) personality traits of openness and agreeableness. Participants with high childhood trauma experienced greater improvement with sertraline (Cohen's d=0.87), whereas those with either higher levels of subthreshold hypomanic symptoms (Cohen's d=0.67) or with lower levels of agreeableness and openness experienced greater improvement with placebo (Cohen's d=0.71). Participants with high childhood trauma had greater connectivity between salience and dorsal attention networks, whereas those with higher levels of subthreshold hypomanic symptoms and lower levels of agreeableness and openness had greater connectivity within limbic network and that of visual network with hippocampus and dorsal attention network., Conclusion: Assessing history of childhood trauma, presence of subthreshold hypomanic symptoms and personality traits may help to identify subgroups of patients with MDD who respond differentially to sertraline or placebo and have distinct neural signatures., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic and disabling disorder, for which available pharmacotherapies have limited efficacy. The authors' previous proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial of single-dose intravenous ketamine infusion in individuals with PTSD showed significant and rapid PTSD symptom reduction 24 hours postinfusion. The present study is the first randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy and safety of repeated intravenous ketamine infusions for the treatment of chronic PTSD., Methods: Individuals with chronic PTSD (N=30) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six infusions of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.045 mg/kg) (psychoactive placebo control) over 2 consecutive weeks. Clinician-rated and self-report assessments were administered 24 hours after the first infusion and at weekly visits. The primary outcome measure was change in PTSD symptom severity, as assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5), from baseline to 2 weeks (after completion of all infusions). Secondary outcome measures included the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and side effect measures., Results: The ketamine group showed a significantly greater improvement in CAPS-5 and MADRS total scores than the midazolam group from baseline to week 2. At week 2, the mean CAPS-5 total score was 11.88 points (SE=3.96) lower in the ketamine group than in the midazolam group (d=1.13, 95% CI=0.36, 1.91). Sixty-seven percent of participants in the ketamine group were treatment responders, compared with 20% in the midazolam group. Among ketamine responders, the median time to loss of response was 27.5 days following the 2-week course of infusions. Ketamine infusions were well tolerated overall, without serious adverse events., Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial provides the first evidence of efficacy of repeated ketamine infusions in reducing symptom severity in individuals with chronic PTSD. Further studies are warranted to understand ketamine's full potential as a treatment for chronic PTSD.

Background: This report evaluated sex-specific differences in the association between brain aging and body mass index (BMI) in young adults using the publicly available data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP)., Methods: Participants of HCP with available structural imaging and BMI data were included [n = 1112; mean age = 28.80 (SD = 3.70); mean BMI = 26.53 (SD = 5.20); males n = 507, females n = 605]. Predicted brain age was generated using raw T1-weighted MRI scan and a Gaussian Processes regression model. The difference (Δ aging) between brain age predicted by structural imaging and chronological age was computed. A linear regression model was used with Δ aging as the dependent variable, and sex, BMI, and BMI-by-sex interaction as independent variables of interest, and race, ethnicity, income, and education as covariates., Results: There was a significant BMI-by-sex interaction for Δ aging (p = 0.041). Higher BMI was associated with greater brain aging in both sexes. However, this association was substantially stronger in males (β = 0.215; SE = 0.050; p < 0.0001) than in females (β = 0.122; SE = 0.035; p = 0.0005)., Conclusion: We found evidence suggesting that higher BMI is associated with greater brain aging in adults. Furthermore, the association between higher BMI and greater brain aging was stronger in males than in females. Future studies are needed to explore the mechanistic pathways that link higher BMI to greater brain aging and whether weight-loss interventions, such as exercise, can reverse higher BMI-associated greater brain aging., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Ketamine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist with rapid antidepressant effects. Studies suggest that inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis plays a role in the mechanism of action of ketamine. This randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated whether co-administration of sodium nitroprusside, a nitric oxide donor, compared to placebo, would attenuate the antidepressant and dissociative effects of ketamine. Sixteen ketamine responders were randomized to a double-blind infusion of ketamine co-administered with placebo or sodium nitroprusside. Our findings show no difference between the two conditions suggesting that the nitric oxide pathway may not play a primary role in ketamine's antidepressant or dissociative effects. The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03102736).

Background: Adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) often experience reduced quality of life (QOL). Efficacious acute-phase treatments, including cognitive therapy (CT) or medication, decrease depressive symptoms and, to a lesser degree, increase QOL. We tested longer-term changes in QOL after response to acute-phase CT, including the potential effects of continuation treatment for depression and time-lagged relations between QOL and depressive symptoms., Methods: Responders to acute-phase CT (N = 290) completed QOL and depressive symptom assessments repeatedly for 32 post-acute months. Higher-risk responders were randomized to 8 months of continuation treatment (CT, fluoxetine, or pill placebo) and then entered a 24-month follow-up. Lower-risk responders were only assessed for 32 months., Results: On average, large gains in QOL made during acute-phase CT response were maintained for 32 months. Continuation CT or fluoxetine did not improve QOL relative to pill placebo. Controlling for residual depressive symptoms, higher QOL after acute-phase CT response was a protective factor against MDD relapse and recurrence. Higher QOL predicted subsequent reductions in depressive symptom severity, but depressive symptom severity did not predict subsequent changes in QOL., Limitations: Generalization of results to other patient populations, treatments, and measures is uncertain. The clinical trial was not designed to test relations between QOL and depression. Replication is needed before clinical application of these results., Conclusions: Gains in QOL made during response to acute-phase CT are relatively stable and may help protect against relapse/recurrence. Continuation CT or fluoxetine may not further improve QOL among acute-phase CT responders., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Major depressive disorder is associated with abnormal connectivity across emotion and reward circuits as well as other established circuits that may negatively impact treatment response. The goal of this study was to perform an exploratory reanalysis of archival data from a clinical trial to identify moderators of treatment outcome of sertraline over placebo., Methods: EMBARC (Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response in Clinical Care) study participants completed magnetic resonance imaging before randomization to either sertraline or placebo for 8 weeks (n = 279). Seed-based functional connectivity was computed using 4 bilateral seeds (2 spheres defined bilaterally): amygdala, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), subcallosal cingulate cortex, and ventral striatum. Functional connectivity maps were generated, principal component analysis was performed, linear mixed effects models were used to determine moderators of treatment outcome, and post hoc analyses were used to determine level of connectivity (low and high, -1 and +1 SD from the mean) that was most sensitive to improved depression severity (baseline to week 8) based on treatment., Results: Greater mean reduction in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score by 8 weeks occurred with sertraline relative to placebo when connectivity in the DLPFC was low (3-way interaction test, p = .05). Conditional on low connectivity in the DLPFC and subcallosal cingulate cortex and high connectivity in the ventral striatum and amygdala, there was on average a 4.8-point greater reduction in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score with sertraline relative to placebo (p = .003)., Conclusions: The level of functional connectivity seeded in both the DLPFC and the subcallosal cingulate cortex networks may play an important role in identifying a favorable response to sertraline over placebo., (Copyright © 2020 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)