Search

What Is This Summary About?: This summary describes the final analysis of the GRIFFIN study. In this study, participants were newly diagnosed with a type of blood and bone marrow cancer called multiple myeloma, had never received any treatment, and were able to undergo an autologous stem cell transplant. The GRIFFIN study looked at adding the drug daratumumab (D) to a combination of standard treatments called RVd (lenalidomide [R], bortezomib [V], and dexamethasone [d]) during the treatment phases induction and consolidation, followed by daratumumab and lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance. Participants also received an autologous stem cell transplant to further help reduce multiple myeloma. The GRIFFIN study looked at whether D-RVd followed by D-R maintenance was better at killing multiple myeloma cells compared with RVd on its own followed by R maintenance on its own, and if treatments were safe. This summary also describes results from 2 other GRIFFIN publications: one that looked at participants with certain multiple myeloma characteristics or demographic factors that are associated with worse outcomes, and another that looked at how treatments impacted the participants' quality of life., What Were the Results?: At the time of the final analysis of GRIFFIN, participants who were treated with D-RVd followed by D-R maintenance had very low (undetectable) levels of multiple myeloma cells and multiple myeloma markers (biological signs) and were more likely to be alive without the multiple myeloma getting worse or coming back compared with participants who received standard RVd treatment followed by R maintenance. There was also a pattern of similar benefits achieved by participants who were at risk for worse outcomes. Additionally, participants who received D-RVd treatment followed by D-R maintenance reported less pain, less fatigue (extreme tiredness), and greater improvements in their ability to conduct daily physical activities. While some side effects (unwanted or unexpected effects of treatment) were higher with D-RVd, side effects in both groups were as expected, and adding daratumumab did not reduce a participant's ability to handle treatment., What Do the Results of the Study Mean?: Results of the GRIFFIN study showed that D-RVd treatment followed by D-R maintenance was better at treating multiple myeloma than the standard treatment of RVd followed by R maintenance in adults with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma who were able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant, with no unexpected side effects of treatment. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02874742 (GRIFFIN) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Multiple myeloma is a treatable, but currently incurable, hematological malignancy of plasma cells characterized by diverse and complex tumor genetics for which precision medicine approaches to treatment are lacking. The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation's Relating Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile study ( NCT01454297 ) is a longitudinal, observational clinical study of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma (n = 1,143) where tumor samples are characterized using whole-genome sequencing, whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing at diagnosis and progression, and clinical data are collected every 3 months. Analyses of the baseline cohort identified genes that are the target of recurrent gain-of-function and loss-of-function events. Consensus clustering identified 8 and 12 unique copy number and expression subtypes of myeloma, respectively, identifying high-risk genetic subtypes and elucidating many of the molecular underpinnings of these unique biological groups. Analysis of serial samples showed that 25.5% of patients transition to a high-risk expression subtype at progression. We observed robust expression of immunotherapy targets in this subtype, suggesting a potential therapeutic option., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Abstract: The optimal means of assessing candidacy of older adults (≥65 years) for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy are unknown. We explored the role of a geriatric assessment (GA)-guided multidisciplinary clinic (GA-MDC) in selecting and optimizing older adults for CAR-T. Sixty-one patients were evaluated in a GA-MDC (median age, 73 years; range, 58-83). A nonbinding recommendation ("proceed" or "decline") regarding suitability for CAR-T was provided for each patient based on GA results. Fifty-three patients ultimately received CAR-T (proceed, n = 47; decline, n = 6). Among patients who received B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed (n = 11) and CD19-directed CAR-T (n = 42), the median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months and 16.6 months, respectively. GA uncovered high rates of geriatric impairment among patients proceeding to CAR-T therapy, with fewer impairments in those recommended "proceed." Patients recommended "proceed" had shorter median length of stay (17 vs 31 days; P = .05) and lower rates of intensive care unit admission (6% vs 50%; P = .01) than those recommended "decline." In patients receiving CD19- and BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy, a "proceed" recommendation was associated with superior OS compared with "decline" (median, 16.6 vs 11.4 months [P = .02]; and median, 16.4 vs 4.2 months [P = .03], respectively). When controlling for Karnofsky performance status, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase at time of lymphodepletion, the GA-MDC treatment recommendation remained prognostic for OS (hazard ratio, 3.26; P = .04). Patients optimized via the GA-MDC without serious vulnerabilities achieved promising outcomes, whereas patients with high vulnerability experienced high toxicity and poor outcomes after CAR-T therapy., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The randomized, phase 2 GRIFFIN study (NCT02874742) evaluated daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We present final post hoc analyses (median follow-up, 49.6 months) of clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per revised definition (del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], and/or gain/amp[1q21]). Patients received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd/RVd), high-dose therapy/transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd/RVd), and lenalidomide±daratumumab maintenance (≤ 2 years). Minimal residual disease-negativity (10 -5 ) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd in patients ≥ 65 years (67.9% vs 17.9%), with HRCAs (54.8% vs 32.4%), and with gain/amp(1q21) (61.8% vs 28.6%). D-RVd showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival versus RVd (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in patients ≥ 65 years (0.29 [0.06-1.48]), with HRCAs (0.38 [0.14-1.01]), and with gain/amp(1q21) (0.42 [0.14-1.27]). In the functional high-risk subgroup (not MRD negative at the end of consolidation), the hazard ratio was 0.82 (0.35-1.89). Among patients ≥ 65 years, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd (88.9% vs 77.8%), as were TEAEs leading to discontinuation of ≥ 1 treatment component (37.0% vs 25.9%). One D-RVd patient died due to an unrelated TEAE. These results support the addition of daratumumab to RVd in transplant-eligible patients with high-risk NDMM. Video Abstract., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In the phase 2 GRIFFIN trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02874742), daratumumab added to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) improved depth of response and progression-free survival (PFS) versus lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) alone in transplant-eligible (TE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item (QLQ-C30), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module 20-item (QLQ-MY20), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) tools on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 3; on day 21 of cycle 4 (end of induction therapy); on day 1 of cycle 5; on day 21 of cycle 6 (end of posttransplant consolidation therapy); and at months 6, 12, 18, and 24 of maintenance therapy. Meaningful improvements from baseline were seen in most of the PRO scales with both treatments after consolidation and were sustained for at least 2 years of maintenance treatment. Large reductions from baseline (~20 points) were especially observed in pain symptoms for both treatment groups, although these were numerically higher for patients receiving D-RVd during the majority of the time points. In addition, improvements in key scales, such as global health status, fatigue symptoms, and physical functioning, were also seen with both D-RVd and RVd. These improvements in health-related quality of life contribute to the totality of evidence supporting the improvement in clinical outcomes such as response rates and PFS with D-RVd in induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy in TE patients with NDMM., (© 2024 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Due in part to racial disparities and underrepresentation in clinical studies, optimal therapies for Black patients with multiple myeloma remain undefined. This final analysis of GRIFFIN by race showed that the addition of daratumumab (D) to lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (RVd) provides clinical benefit among both Black and White transplant-eligible newly diagnosed patients compared with RVd alone. However, Black patients were more likely to discontinue ≥1 drug due to treatment-emergent adverse events. In summary, these findings suggest a benefit of D-RVd front-line therapy among Black and White patients and underscore the importance of equitable treatment access for all patients., (© 2024 Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In the MASTER study (NCT03224507), daratumumab+carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-KRd) demonstrated promising efficacy in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). In GRIFFIN (NCT02874742), daratumumab+lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) improved outcomes for transplant-eligible NDMM. Here, we present a post hoc analysis of patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs; del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], or gain/amp[1q21]). Among 123 D-KRd patients, 43.1%, 37.4%, and 19.5% had 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs. Among 120 D-RVd patients, 55.8%, 28.3%, and 10.8% had 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs. Rates of complete response or better (best on study) for 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs were 90.6%, 89.1%, and 70.8% for D-KRd, and 90.9%, 78.8%, and 61.5% for D-RVd. At median follow-up (MASTER, 31.1 months; GRIFFIN, 49.6 months for randomized patients/59.5 months for safety run-in patients), MRD-negativity rates as assessed by next-generation sequencing (10 -5 ) were 80.0%, 86.4%, and 83.3% for 0, 1, or ≥2 HRCAs for D-KRd, and 76.1%, 55.9%, and 61.5% for D-RVd. PFS was similar between studies and superior for 0 or 1 versus ≥2 HRCAs: 36-month PFS rates for D-KRd were 89.9%, 86.2%, and 52.4%, and 96.7%, 90.5%, and 53.5% for D-RVd. These data support the use of daratumumab-containing regimens for transplant-eligible NDMM with HCRAs; however, additional strategies are needed for ultra-high-risk disease (≥2 HRCAs). Video Abstract., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become a standard of care in relapsed/refractory (R/R) aggressive large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL) though the majority of recipients do not receive durable disease benefit, prompting the need to better define risk factors for relapse/progression., Objectives: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients treated with commercial CAR T-cell therapy to evaluate the impact of tumor burden, as measured by whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTV) from 18 F fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging, on treatment outcomes., Study Design: Sixty-one patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy for R/R B-NHL between May 2016 and November 2021 were included., Results: Using a receiver operating characteristic curve-based MTV optimization cutoff of 450 mL, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 22% for high MTV versus 54% for low MTV (P < .01), and 1-year overall survival (OS) was 37% and 73%, respectively (P = .01). In a subset of 46 patients, residual MTV of less than 106 mL at the day 30 (D30) disease assessment was associated with significantly improved outcomes (1-year OS 85% vs. 13%, P < .01). Incorporation of pretreatment MTV to the International Prognostic Index (IPI) scoring system significantly distinguished 2-year PFS and OS outcomes by 3 risk groups., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that both pretreatment and D30 MTV are predictive of outcomes among R/R B-NHL patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy. These data indicate that efforts to reduce pretreatment tumor burden may improve longitudinal clinical outcomes. Furthermore, D30 postinfusion MTV quantification may aid clinicians in optimally identifying patients at high-risk for progression, and in whom closer disease monitoring should be considered. MTV also adds prognostic value to patients with high-risk IPI and holds promise for incorporation in novel risk scoring systems which can identify patients prior to CAR T-cell therapy at highest risk of adverse outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure A.E.R., D.E.A., Y.P., N.F., S.K., M.T.N., and S.M.S. report no relevant COI. J.P.K. receives research support from Merck, iTeos, and Verastem Oncology; advisory boards for Merck, Kite Pharma, Inc./Gilead, Seattle Genetics, and Verastem Oncology; speaker for Kite Pharma, Inc./Gilead. B.A.D. has received advisory board fees from Janssen, Sanofi, and consulting fees from COTA Healthcare. A.J. receives consulting and advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, GSK, Janssen, and Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. H.L. received research support from BMS and Karyopharm, has served on advisory board meeting for Agios. M.R.B. is a consultant and/or advisor for Celgene, Kite Pharma, Inc./Gilead, CRISPR Therapeutics, Takeda, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; speaker for Kite Pharma, Inc./Gilead, BMS, Incyte, Agios, and Celgene. Other financial interest/relationship for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation as a part of steering committees. P.A.R. has served as a consultant and/or advisory board member for AbbVie, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Pharmacyclics, Novartis, BMS, Kite/Gilead, Nurix Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, Takeda, Intellia Therapeutics, Sana Biotechnology, BeiGene, Janssen, CVS Caremark. He has served as a speaker for Kite Pharma and has received honoraria from Novartis. Research support from BMS, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, MorphoSys, CRISPR Therapeutics, Calibr, Xencor, Fate Therapeutics, and Tessa Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-RVd) in the GRIFFIN study improved the stringent complete response rate by the end of consolidation in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here, we report the findings of the predefined final analysis., Methods: GRIFFIN was an open-label, randomised, active-controlled, phase 2 trial done in 35 research centres in the USA. Patients had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with measurable disease by M protein or free light chain, were aged 18-70 years, had an ECOG performance score of 0-2, and were eligible for autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to four D-RVd or RVd induction cycles, autologous HSCT, two D-RVd or RVd consolidation cycles, and lenalidomide with or without daratumumab maintenance therapy for 2 years. Patients received 21-day cycles of oral lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-14), subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m 2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), oral dexamethasone (40 mg weekly) with or without intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg weekly, cycles 1-4; day 1, cycles 5-6). Maintenance therapy (28-day cycles) was oral lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1-21) with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg intravenously every 4 or 8 weeks, or 1800 mg subcutaneously monthly). Patients could continue lenalidomide maintenance after study treatment completion. The primary endpoint was stringent complete response rate by the end of consolidation in the response-evaluable population, and has already been reported. Here we report updated stringent complete response rates and secondary outcomes including progression-free survival and overall survival. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02874742) and ended on April 8, 2022., Findings: Between Dec 20, 2016, and April 10, 2018, 104 patients were randomly assigned to the D-RVd group and 103 were randomly assigned to the RVd group; most patients were White (85 [82%] in the D-RVd group and 76 [74%] in the RVd group) and male (58 [56%] in the D-RVd group and 60 [58%] in the RVd group). At a median follow-up of 49·6 months (IQR 47·4-52·1), D-RVd improved rates of stringent complete response (67 [67%] of 100] vs 47 [48%] of 98]; odds ratio 2·18 [95% CI 1·22-3·89], p=0·0079), and 4-year progression-free survival was 87·2% (95% CI 77·9-92·8) for D-RVd versus 70·0% (95% CI 55·9-80·3) for RVd, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·45 (95% CI 0·21-0·95, p=0·032) for risk of disease progression or death with D-RVd. Median overall survival was not reached for either group (HR 0·90 [95% CI 0·31-2·56], p=0·84). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events in the D-RVd versus RVd groups were neutropenia (46 [46%] of 99 vs 23 [23%] of 102), lymphopenia (23 [23%] vs 23 [23%]), leukopenia (17 [17%] vs eight [8%]), thrombocytopenia (16 [16%] vs nine [9%]), pneumonia (12 [12%] vs 14 [14%]), and hypophosphataemia (ten [10%] vs 11 [11%]). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 46 (46%) of 99 patients in the D-RVd group and in 53 (52%) of 102 patients in the RVd group. One patient in each treatment group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event that resulted in death (bronchopneumonia in the D-RVd group; cause unknown in the RVd group); neither was related to study treatment. No new safety concerns occurred with maintenance therapy., Interpretation: Addition of daratumumab to RVd improved the depth of response and progression-free survival in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. These results justify further evaluation in phase 3 studies., Funding: Janssen Oncology., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests PMV served as a consultant for, served on an advisory board for, and received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Secura Bio. DWS served as a consultant or in an advisory role for GlaxoSmithKline, AbbVie, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Pfizer. JLK served as a consultant for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, and Tecnopharma; received research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fortis Therapeutics, Heidelberg Pharma, Janssen, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sutro Biopharma, and Takeda; received honoraria from AbbVie, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, and Tecnopharma; and served on an advisory board for Incyte and TG Therapeutics. BR received honoraria from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, and PharmaEssentia. CR served as a consultant and on a speakers bureau for Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, and Karyopharm Therapeutics. ACh served as a consultant or in an advisory role for Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Seattle Genetics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Genzyme, Oncopeptides, Takeda, Antengene, GlaxoSmithKline, Secura Bio, Shattuck Labs, Genentech, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; and received research funding from Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Pharmacyclics. RS served as a consultant or in an advisory role for Sanofi/Aventis, Janssen Oncology, and Oncopeptides; and received research funding from Sanofi. LJC served as a consultant or in an advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Sanofi; served on a speakers bureau for Amgen and Sanofi; received honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Sanofi; and received research funding from Amgen and Janssen. LDA served as a consultant or in an advisory role for and received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, Oncopeptides, Karyopharm Therapeutics, AbbVie, BeiGene, Cellectar, and Sanofi. NS served as a consultant for Amgen, CareDx, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Indapta Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi; and received research funding from bluebird bio, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Nektar, Poseida, Precision BioSciences, Sutro Biopharma, and TeneoBio. NB received honoraria from OncLive; and served as a consultant or in an advisory role and on a speakers bureau for Janssen, Sanofi Genzyme, and Oncopeptides. YAE received research funding, received honoraria, and served on a speakers bureau for Janssen, Takeda, Oncopeptides, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb. SAH served as a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Oncopeptides, GlaxoSmithKline, Secura Bio, and Sanofi; and received research funding from Oncopeptides. CC received honoraria from Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Janssen. AJ served as a consultant or in an advisory role for and received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, and Sanofi. TMW served as a consultant for Janssen, Carevive, and Sanofi. RZO holds stock and other ownership interests in Asylia Therapeutics; received honoraria from and served as a consultant or in an advisory role for AbbVie, Biotheryx, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Meridian Therapeutics, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Neoleukin Corporation, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda; received research funding from Asylia Therapeutics, Biotheryx, and Heidelberg Pharma; and holds patents, royalties, or other intellectual property for Asylia Therapeutics. KHS served on an advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen; received research funding from AbbVie and Karyopharm Therapeutics; served on a speakers bureau for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sanofi Genzyme; served as a consultant for Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme; and received honoraria from Karyopharm Therapeutics. AJC served as a consultant for Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, AbbVie, Sanofi, Cellectar, GlaxoSmithKline, and Secura Bio; and received research funding from Janssen, AbbVie, Sanofi, Harpoon, Bristol Myers Squibb, Adaptive Biotechnologies, and Nektar. SD is the Executive Officer for Alliance Foundation Trials for Clinical Trials. HP, ACo, and SP are employees of and hold stock and other ownership in Janssen. TSL is an employee of Janssen. SZU served as a consultant or in an advisory role for Celgene, Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm Therapeutics, AbbVie, SkylineDx, Merck, Oncopeptides, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; served on a speakers bureau for Takeda, Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene; and received research funding from Celgene and Array BioPharma. PGR received research funding from Oncopeptides, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Karyopharm Therapeutics; and served on an advisory committee for Oncopeptides, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Janssen, Sanofi, Secura Bio, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, AstraZeneca, and Protocol Intelligence. JL and NN declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy expressing B cell maturation antigen (BCMA). Elranatamab, a bispecific antibody, engages BCMA on MM and CD3 on T cells. The MagnetisMM-1 trial evaluated its safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy. Primary endpoints, including the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities as well as objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR), were met. Secondary efficacy endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Eighty-eight patients with relapsed or refractory MM received elranatamab monotherapy, and 55 patients received elranatamab at efficacious doses. Patients had received a median of five prior regimens; 90.9% were triple-class refractory, 29.1% had high cytogenetic risk and 23.6% received prior BCMA-directed therapy. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during dose escalation. Adverse events included cytopenias and cytokine release syndrome. Exposure was dose proportional. With a median follow-up of 12.0 months, the ORR was 63.6% and 38.2% of patients achieving complete response or better. For responders, the median DOR was 17.1 months. All 13 patients evaluable for minimal residual disease achieved negativity. Even after prior BCMA-directed therapy, 53.8% achieved response. For all 55 patients, median PFS was 11.8 months, and median OS was 21.2 months. Elranatamab achieved durable responses, manageable safety and promising survival for patients with MM. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03269136 ., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Extrapolating long-term overall survival (OS) from shorter-term clinical trial data is key to health technology assessment in oncology. However, extrapolation using conventional methods is often subject to uncertainty. Using ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma, we used a flexible Bayesian approach to demonstrate use of external longer-term data to reduce the uncertainty in long-term extrapolation., Methods: The pivotal CARTITUDE-1 trial (NCT03548207) provided the primary efficacy data for cilta-cel, including a 12-month median follow-up snapshot of OS. Longer-term (48-month median follow-up) survival data from the phase I LEGEND-2 study (NCT03090659) were also available. Twelve-month CARTITUDE-1 OS data were extrapolated in two ways: (1) conventional survival models with standard parametric distributions (uninformed), and (2) Bayesian survival models whose shape prior was informed from 48-month LEGEND-2 data. For validation, extrapolations from 12-month CARTITUDE-1 data were compared with observed 28-month CARTITUDE-1 data., Results: Extrapolations of the 12-month CARTITUDE-1 data using conventional uninformed parametric models were highly variable. Using informative priors from the 48-month LEGEND-2 dataset, the ranges of projected OS at different timepoints were consistently narrower. Area differences between the extrapolation curves and the 28-month CARTITUDE-1 data were generally lower in informed Bayesian models, except for the uninformed log-normal model, which had the lowest difference., Conclusions: Informed Bayesian survival models reduced variation of long-term projections and provided similar projections as the uninformed log-normal model. Bayesian models generated a narrower and more plausible range of OS projections from 12-month data that aligned with observed 28-month data., Trial Registration: CARTITUDE-1 ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03548207. LEGEND-2 ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03090659, registered retrospectively on 27 March 2017, and ChiCTR-ONH-17012285., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy studied in patients with multiple myeloma exposed to three classes of treatment in the single-arm CARTITUDE-1 study. To assess the effectiveness of cilta-cel compared to real-world clinical practice (RWCP), we performed adjusted comparisons using individual patients' data from CARTITUDE-1 and LocoMMotion, a prospective, multinational study of patients with multiple myeloma triple-class exposed of treatment. Comparisons were performed using inverse probability weighting. In CARTITUDE-1, 113 patients were enrolled, and 97 patients were infused with cilta-cel. In LocoMMotion, 248 patients were enrolled, and 170 patients were included in the comparisons versus infused patients. Ninety-two unique regimens were used in LocoMMotion, most frequently carfilzomib-dexamethasone (13.7%), pomalidomide-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (13.3%) and pomalidomidedexamethasone (11.3%). Adjusted comparisons showed that patients treated with cilta-cel were 3.12-fold more likely to respond to treatment than those managed by RWCP (response rate, 3.12, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.24-4.00), had their risk of progression or death reduced to by 85% (progression-free survival hazard ratio=0.15, 95% CI: 0.08-0.29), and a risk of death lowered by 80% (overall survival hazard ratio HR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.09-0.41). The incremental improvement in healthrelated quality of life from baseline for cilta-cel versus RWCP at week 52, as measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status, was 13.4 (95% CI: 3.5-23.6) and increased to 30.8 (95% CI: 21.8-39.8) when including death as additional information regarding patients' health status. Patients treated with cilta-cel experienced more adverse events than those managed with RWCP (any grade: 100% vs. 83.5%). The results from this study demonstrate improved efficacy outcomes of cilta-cel versus RWCP and highlight its potential as a novel and effective treatment option for patients with multiple myeloma triple-class exposed of antimyeloma treatment. CARTITUDE-1 is registered with clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03548207. LocoMMotion is registered with clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT04035226.

We performed a phase I study of weekly selinexor, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (wSKd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of wSKd. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Prior exposure/refractoriness to carfilzomib was permitted. Thirty patients were enrolled; 26 (87%) had triple-class exposed disease and 6 (20%) received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Dose level 2 (carfilzomib 70 mg/m 2 Intravenous [IV] on Days 1, 8, and 15; selinexor 100 mg PO on Days 1, 8, 15, 22; dexamethasone 40 mg on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 of 28-day cycles) was chosen as the MTD, with no DLTs having occurred. The most common hematologic adverse events (AE) were thrombocytopenia (83%), anemia (70%), lymphopenia (50%), and neutropenia (50%). The most common nonhematologic AE were fatigue (70%), nausea (70%), diarrhea (53%), and anorexia (47%). The ORR was 21/30 (70%) overall and 18/23 (78%) at the MTD. At a median follow-up of 12.3 months, the median PFS was 5.3 months and median OS 23.3 months. Responses were similar in carfilzomib naïve and exposed patients. Long-term efficacy of wSKd is modest; wSKd could be employed as a bridging strategy to immunotherapies., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is a plasma cell neoplasm defined by progressively refractory disease necessitating chronic and increasingly intensive therapy. Despite recent advances, limited treatment options exist for RRMM. This single-arm, open label phase 1 study aimed to evaluate the safety of novel B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T construct that leverages a completely synthetic antigen-binding domain (CART-ddBCMA), which was specifically engineered to reduce immunogenicity and improve CAR cell surface stability. Thirteen patients ≥18 years with RRMM who received at least 3 prior regimens of systemic therapy were enrolled in the study. Patients received a single dose of 100 × 106 CART-ddBCMA (DL1) or 300 × 106 CART-ddBCMA (DL2) following standard lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The primary endpoints of the study were to evaluate the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events, including dose-limiting toxicities, and establish a recommended phase 2 dose. Results showed that CART-ddBCMA was well tolerated and demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile. Only 1 case of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and 1 case of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity were reported; both were at DL2 and were manageable with standard treatment. No atypical neurological toxicities and Parkinson disease-like movement disorders were observed. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. All infused patients responded to CART-ddBCMA, and 9/12 (75%) patients achieved complete response/stringent complete response. Responses deepened over time, and at the time of last data-cut (median follow-up 56 weeks), 8/9 (89%) evaluable patients achieved minimal residual disease negativity. In conclusion, the findings demonstrate the safety of CART-ddBCMA cells and document durable responses to CART-ddBCMA in patients with RRMM. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04155749., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

For eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), standard of care includes induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Daratumumab as monotherapy and in combination treatment is approved across multiple lines of therapy for multiple myeloma (MM), and lenalidomide is an effective and commonly used agent for induction and maintenance therapy in MM. However, there is concern that lenalidomide and daratumumab given as induction therapy might impair mobilization of stem cells for ASCT. Therefore, we assessed stem cell mobilization in patients following frontline induction therapy in the MASTER and GRIFFIN phase 2 clinical studies by examining stem cell mobilization yields, apheresis attempts, and engraftment outcomes for patients from each study. Adult transplantation-eligible patients with NDMM received induction therapy consisting of daratumumab plus carfilzomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-KRd) for four 28-day cycles in the single-arm MASTER trial or lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (RVd) with or without daratumumab (D) for four 21-day cycles in the randomized GRIFFIN trial, followed by stem cell mobilization and ASCT in both studies. Institutional practice differed regarding plerixafor use for stem cell mobilization; the strategies were upfront (ie, planned plerixafor use) or rescue (ie, plerixafor use only after mobilization parameters indicated failure with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] alone). Descriptive analyses were used to summarize patient characteristics, stem cell mobilization yields, and engraftment outcomes. In MASTER, 116 D-KRd recipients underwent stem cell mobilization and collection at a median of 24 days after completing induction therapy. In GRIFFIN, 175 patients (D-RVd, n = 95; RVd, n = 80) underwent mobilization at a median of 27 days after completing D-RVd induction therapy and 24 days after completing RVd induction therapy. Among those who underwent mobilization and collection, 7% (8 of 116) of D-KRd recipients, 2% (2 of 95) of D-RVd recipients, and 6% (5 of 80) of RVd recipients did not meet the center-specific minimally required CD34 +  cell yield in the first mobilization attempt; however, nearly all collected sufficient stem cells for ASCT on remobilization. Among patients who underwent mobilization, plerixafor use, either upfront or as a rescue strategy, was higher in patients receiving D-KRd (97%; 112 of 116) and D-RVd (72%; 68 of 95) compared with those receiving RVd (55%; 44 of 80). The median total CD34 +  cell collection was 6.0 × 10 6 /kg (range, 2.2 to 13.9 × 10 6 /kg) after D-KRd induction, 8.3 × 10 6 /kg (range, 2.6 to 33.0 × 10 6 /kg) after D-RVd induction, and 9.4 × 10 6 /kg (range, 4.1 to 28.7 × 10 6 /kg) after RVd induction; the median days for collection were 2, 2, and 1, respectively. Among patients who underwent mobilization, 98% (114 of 116) of D-KRd patients, 99% (94 of 95) of D-RVd patients, and 98% (78 of 80) of RVd patients underwent ASCT using median CD34 +  cell doses of 3.2 × 10 6 /kg, 4.2 × 10 6 /kg, and 4.8 × 10 6 /kg, respectively. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 12 days in all 3 treatment groups across the 2 trials. Because both trials used different criteria to define platelet recovery, data on platelet engraftment using the same criteria are not available. Four cycles of daratumumab- and lenalidomide-based quadruplet induction therapy had a minimal impact on stem cell mobilization and allowed predictable stem cell harvesting and engraftment in all patients who underwent ASCT. Upfront plerixafor strategy may be considered, but many patients were successfully collected with the use of G-CSF alone or rescue plerixafor., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement SC received honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Omeros, and Sanofi and institutional research funding from Janssen, Amgen, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Allogene, Ionis, Novartis, Syndax, and GlaxoSmithKline, and is co-chair of the SWOG S1803 clinical trial. NLW received consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and holds stock in Gilead. LJC served as a consultant and received honoraria from Amgen, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Karyopharm, Pfizer, and Sanofi; received research funding from Amgen, Janssen, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and served on speakers bureaus for Amgen and Sanofi. JLK served as a consultant for Genentech, AbbVie, Janssen, Incyte, Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche/Genentech, and Tecnopharma; received research funding from Genentech, AbbVie, Janssen, Amgen, Fortis Therapeutics, Heidelberg Pharma, Novartis, Sutro Biopharma, and Takeda; received honoraria from Tecnopharma, AbbVie, Janssen, Roche/Genentech, and Tecnopharma; and held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Incyte and TG Therapeutics. DWS served as a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Sanofi; and served as a consultant and held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Janssen and AbbVie. BR received honoraria from Incyte, Takeda, and PharmaEssentia; served as a consultant for PharmaEssentia; and served on a speakers bureau for Bristol Myers Squibb. CR served as a consultant and on speakers bureaus for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, and Karyopharm; and received honoraria and served as a consultant for Oncopeptides. AC served as a consultant and held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Janssen Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Amgen, Karyopharm, Sanofi Genzyme, Oncopeptides, GlaxoSmithKline, Secura Bio, Shattuck Labs, Genentech, AbbVie, and Antengene; served as a consultant for Takeda, Novartis, and Millennium/Takeda; held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committee for Seattle Genetics; and received research funding from Janssen Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, Seattle Genetics, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, and Millennium/Takeda. RS held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Sanofi Genzyme and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and received research funding from Sanofi Genzyme. LDA served as a consultant, received honoraria, held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committee, and received research funding from Celgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, BeiGene, Prothena, and Amgen. SB received grants from Amyloid Foundation and honoraria from Adaptive Biotechnology. BD served as a consultant for Janssen, Sanofi, Genentech, and AbbVie; received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Karyopharm, and Janssen; and served on an advisory board for Janssen, Natera, Arcellx Takeda, Amgen, and Sanofi. NS served as a consultant for Amgen, CareDx, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Indapta Therapeutics, Karyopharm, Kite, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi; and received research funding from bluebird bio, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Nektar, Poseida, Precision BioSciences, Sutro Biopharma, and TeneoBio. NB held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Sanofi and Janssen; and served on a speakers bureau for Sanofi and Amgen. SAH served as a consultant for BMS/Celgene, Genetech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Secura Bio, and Takeda and received research funding from Oncopeptides. CC received honoraria and research funding from Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, and Bristol Myers Squibb; served as a consultant for Takeda, Celgene, and Janssen; and received research funding from Celgene and Poseida. AJ held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Sanofi, Karyopharm, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gracell, and Celgene. TMW served as a consultant for Janssen, Carevive, Seattle Genetics, and Sanofi. TS served as a consultant for Sanofi and Janssen. RZO served as a consultant and received honoraria from Amgen, BioTheryX, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Janssen, Karyopharm, Neoleukin Corporation, Oncopeptides AB, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, and Takeda; received research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda, Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., BioTheryX, Inc., and Heidelberg Pharma; holds individual stocks in a privately held company and patents and royalties for Asylia Therapeutics, Inc.; and held membership on an entity's board of directors or advisory committees for Amgen, BioTheryX, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, Celg, (Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: CARTITUDE-1, a phase Ib/II study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, yielded early, deep, and durable responses at 12 months. Here, we present updated results 2 years after last patient in (median follow-up [MFU] approximately 28 months), including analyses of high-risk patient subgroups., Methods: Eligible patients had relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug and had received prior proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 therapy. Patients received a single cilta-cel infusion 5-7 days after lymphodepletion. Responses were assessed by an independent review committee., Results: At a MFU of 27.7 months (N = 97), the overall response rate was 97.9% (95% CI, 92.7 to 99.7); 82.5% (95% CI, 73.4 to 89.4) of patients achieved a stringent complete response. Median duration of response was not estimable. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached; 27-month PFS and OS rates were 54.9% (95% CI, 44.0 to 64.6) and 70.4% (95% CI, 60.1 to 78.6), respectively. Overall response rates were high across all subgroups (95.1%-100%). Duration of response, PFS, and/or OS were shorter in patients with high-risk cytogenetics, International Staging System stage III, high tumor burden, or plasmacytomas. The safety profile was manageable with no new cilta-cel-related cytokine release syndrome and one new case of parkinsonism (day 914 after cilta-cel) since the last report., Conclusion: At approximately 28 months MFU, patients treated with cilta-cel maintained deep and durable responses, observed in both standard and high-risk subgroups. The risk/benefit profile of cilta-cel remained favorable with longer follow-up.

Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a novel chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, has demonstrated early, deep, and durable clinical responses in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in CARTITUDE-1 (NCT03548207). Patient perspectives on treatment provide context to efficacy outcomes and are an important aspect of therapeutic evaluation., Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted in a subset of CARTITUDE-1 patients (n = 36) at screening, Day 100, and Day 184 post cilta-cel on living with MM, therapy expectations, and treatment experiences during the study., Results: Patients most wanted to see change in symptoms with the greatest impact on HRQoL: pain (85.2%) and fatigue (74.1%). The primary treatment expectation was achieving remission (40.7%), followed by extended life expectancy (14.8%). Patients most often defined meaningful change as improvement in symptoms (70.4%) and return to normalcy (40.7%). The percentage of patients reporting symptoms (pain, fatigue, bone fracture, gastrointestinal, neuropathy, and weakness) decreased from 85.2% to 22.2% across symptom types at baseline to 29.2% to 0% on Day 184 after cilta-cel. Improved symptoms and positive sentiments corresponded with improved perception of overall health status and reduced pain level, respectively. Most patients reported that their expectations of cilta-cel treatment had been met (70.8%) or exceeded (20.8%) at Day 184, and 70.8% of patients considered cilta-cel therapy better than their previous treatments., Conclusion: Overall HRQoL improvements and qualitative interviews showed cilta-cel met patient expectations of treatment and suggest the long treatment-free period also contributed to positive sentiments., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: CARTITUDE-1 is a phase 1b-2 study evaluating ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy with two B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Primary efficacy outcomes have previously been reported. Here, we report health-related quality of life (HRQOL) secondary outcomes evaluated using patient-reported outcomes., Methods: This single-arm, open-label, phwase 1b-2 study was done at 16 centres in the USA. Patients were aged 18 years or older with diagnosis of multiple myeloma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less with three or more previous lines of therapy, or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug, and had received a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0·75 × 10 6 CAR + T cells per kg) was administered 5-7 days after lymphodepletion. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire core 30-item, pre-specified items from the EORTC myeloma module, and EuroQol five-dimensional descriptive system questionnaire. Clinically meaningful changes in patient-reported outcomes were defined by anchor-based minimally important differences. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548207. This trial is completed but feeding into a long-term follow-up study., Findings: Between July 16, 2018, and Oct 7, 2019, 78 patients were enrolled and underwent apheresis in phase 2 of the study. 68 patients were treated (43 [63%] male, 49 [72%] White), and their patient-reported outcomes assessed (median follow-up 16·9 months, IQR 15·7-17·5). After infusion, a transient decline was observed, followed by improvements in global health status (mean change from baseline to day 464 +8·0 points, SD 20·9), physical (+4·6 points, 21·1), and emotional functional scales (+1·9 points, 23·7) over time, and declines for symptom-based scores (-14·1 pain, SD 31·5 and -15·4 fatigue; SD 29·5), indicating improved patient HRQOL following treatment with cilta-cel., Interpretation: These durable HRQOL improvements are consistent with clinical findings, in which a single cilta-cel infusion led to substantial and durable responses in heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. These results support the use of cilta-cel in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma., Funding: Janssen Research & Development and Legend Biotech USA., Competing Interests: Declaration of interest TM receives research funding from Janssen. YL is a consultant for Bluebird Bio, Celgene/BMS, Fosun Kite, Gamida Cells, Iovance, Janssen, Juno/BMS, Kite/Gilead, Legend Biotech, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, and Vineti; receives research funding from Bluebird Bio, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Merck, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Legend Biotech, and Boston Scientific; and has participated in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for NexImmune, Pfizer, and Sorrento. ADC reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Kite Pharma, Oncopeptides, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda and personal fees and grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis. MH is a current employee of City of Hope Medical Center. AKS receives honoraria from Amgen, Aventis, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Oncopeptides, and Sanofi and serves in a leadership or fiduciary role for Genomics England and Tempus. PH receives consulting fees and honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Kite, Sanofi Genzyme, Spectrum, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals and receives research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Sanofi Genzyme, and Spectrum. JGB receives research funding from AbbVie, Acetylon, Amgen, Bluebird, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cellularity, Constellation, CRISPR Therapeutics, CURIS, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, Genentech, Glenmark, Janssen, Kesios, Novartis, Poseida, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Teva, and Vivolux and is a consultant for Amgen, Bioclinica, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CRISPR Therapeutics, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kite Pharma, Legend, Prothena, SecuraBio, Servier, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. SZU is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Array Biopharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, SkylineDX, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; receives honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MundiPharma, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and receives research funding from Amgen, Array Biopharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, SkylineDX, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. T-MY, YO, JDG, JMS, WD, KSG, JMF, and JJT are employed by Janssen. DM is a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, and Takeda; receives honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Janssen, Celgene, BMS, and Takeda; and has received research funding from Janssen. CCJ is employed by Janssen and is a consultant physician at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. MAk and LP are employed by Legend Biotech. AJ receives consulting fees and honoraria from AbbVie, Adaptive, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Juno, Karyopharm, and Sanofi and serves in a leadership or fiduciary role for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, and Sanofi. SJ is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Legend Biotech, Merck, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; participates in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for DMC; and serves in a leadership or fiduciary role for ASH, IMS, and SOHO. MAg declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are observed until progression, but early treatment may improve outcomes. We conducted a phase II trial of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloLenDex) in patients with high-risk SMM and performed single-cell RNA and T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing on 149 bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples from patients and healthy donors (HDs). We find that early treatment with EloLenDex is safe and effective and provide a comprehensive characterization of alterations in immune cell composition and TCR repertoire diversity in patients. We show that the similarity of a patient's immune cell composition to that of HDs may have prognostic relevance at diagnosis and after treatment and that the abundance of granzyme K (GZMK) + CD8 + effector memory T (TEM) cells may be associated with treatment response. Last, we uncover similarities between immune alterations observed in the BM and PB, suggesting that PB-based immune profiling may have diagnostic and prognostic utility., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests N.J.H. is a consultant for Constellation Pharmaceuticals. F.A. is an employee of Illumina Inc. O.Z. is an employee of Ikena Oncology and a stockholder in Ikena Oncology and Morphosys AG. G.G. receives research funds from IBM and Pharmacyclics and is an inventor on patent applications filed by the Broad Institute related to MSMuTect, MSMutSig, POLYSOLVER, SignatureAnalyzer-GPU, and MSIDetect. He is also a founder and consultant of and holds privately held equity in Scorpion Therapeutics. I.M.G. has a consulting or advisory role with AbbVie, Adaptive, Amgen, Aptitude Health, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Huron Consulting, Janssen, Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sognef, Takeda, The Binding Site, and Window Therapeutics and has received speaker fees from Vor Biopharma and Veeva Systems, Inc., and her spouse is the CMO and equity holder of Disc Medicine. S.M. has a consulting role with Abbvie, Adaptive Biotechnology, Amgen, Celgene/BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Roche, and Takeda and has received research funding from Abbvie, Adaptive Biotechnology, Amgen, Celgene/BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Regeneron, Roche, and Takeda. A.J.Y. has a consulting role with Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, and Takeda and has received research funding from Amgen, Janssen, and Takeda. M.B. is a consultant for Sanofi, Genzyme, and Janssen and has received research funding from MedImmune, Janssen, Legend Biotech, Amgen, Celularity, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Bluebird bio, Millennium, Takeda, Cerecor (currently Avalo Therapeutics), and C4 Therapeutics. M.B has an advisory role and received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, Janssen, and Menarini. T.H.M. received advisory board fees from Legend Biotech. R.S.-P., G.G., and I.M.G. are co-inventors on a patent application related to this work (PCT/US22/74839)., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peripheral neuropathy is a common treatment-emergent side effect during the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Although bortezomib is most commonly implicated, real-world data suggest that lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may also contribute to neuropathy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL)., Methods: The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) CoMMpass Registry was queried for all patients who received frontline VRd or bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCd). Incidence of neuropathy and patient-reported HRQoL outcomes over the first 12 months after diagnosis were compared between patients receiving VRd or VCd with or without early ASCT before 6 months., Results: There were 368 and 191 patients treated with VRd and VCd, respectively. VRd with early ASCT was associated with worse grade 1 neuropathy compared to VRd without early ASCT, as well as compared to VCd with early ASCT. There were no differences in neuropathy between VRd and VCd without early ASCT, and no differences in grade ≥2 neuropathy. There were significant improvements in HRQoL between baseline and 12 months in both VRd and VCd cohorts, regardless of early ASCT. Development of neuropathy was not associated with decrements in progression-free survival or overall survival., Conclusions: In this longitudinal database analysis, there were no differences in grade ≥2 neuropathy between VRd and VCd frontline induction, and overall HRQoL significantly improved across all cohorts. However, differences in grade 1 neuropathy between VRd and VCd induction suggest that lenalidomide and high-dose melphalan may augment the risk of neuropathy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma., Competing Interests: Disclosure A.M. declares no conflicts of interest. B.D. declares honoraria from advisory board activity from Janssen and Sanofi. A.J. declares consulting and advisory boards with honoraria for ABBVIE, AMGEN, BMS, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, and Sanofi-Aventis., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Obesity is associated with survival in several solid tumors and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but its impact on multiple myeloma (MM) survival is unclear. We examined the associations between body mass index (BMI) at different periods of life up to the time of diagnosis and overall survival (OS) among 563 patients newly diagnosed with MM in 2010-2019. BMI at diagnosis was calculated using measured height and weight from electronic medical records (EMR). BMIs at age 20, maximum during adulthood, and 5 years before diagnosis were calculated using self-reported weights and measured height from EMR. Over a median follow-up of 49.3 months, 191 (33.93%) deaths were identified. We used multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to examine the associations between BMIs and OS. Height as well as BMI before and at diagnosis was not associated with OS, but there is a U-shape association between weight and OS. Higher BMIs at diagnosis were associated with better OS among females (HR = 0.39 [0.22-0.71]), irrespective of race. In conclusion, our results suggest that BMI at different periods of life up to the time of diagnosis may not be associated with OS in MM, except that a higher BMI at diagnosis was associated with superior OS for females.

Background: Patients with cancer were excluded from phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials, and the immunogenicity and side effect profiles of these vaccines in this population is not well understood. Patients with cancer can be immunocompromised from chemotherapy, corticosteroids, or the cancer itself, which may affect cellular and/or humoral responses to vaccination. PD-1 is expressed on T effector cells, T follicular helper cells and B cells, leading us to hypothesize that anti-PD-1 immunotherapies may augment antibody or T cell generation after vaccination., Methods: Antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and spike protein were assessed in patients with cancer (n=118) and healthy donors (HD, n=22) after 1, 2 or 3 mRNA vaccine doses. CD4 + and CD8 + T cell reactivity to wild-type (WT) or B.1.617.2 (delta) spike peptides was measured by intracellular cytokine staining., Results: Oncology patients without prior COVID-19 infections receiving immunotherapy (n=36), chemotherapy (n=15), chemoimmunotherapy (n=6), endocrine or targeted therapies (n=6) and those not on active treatment (n=26) had similar RBD and Spike IgG antibody titers to HDs after two vaccinations. Contrary to our hypothesis, PD-1 blockade did not augment antibody titers or T cell responses. Patients receiving B-cell directed therapies (n=14) including anti-CD20 antibodies and multiple myeloma therapies had decreased antibody titers, and 9/14 of these patients were seronegative for RBD antibodies. No differences were observed in WT spike-reactive CD4 + and CD8 + T cell generation between treatment groups. 11/13 evaluable patients seronegative for RBD had a detectable WT spike-reactive CD4 + T cell response. T cells cross-reactive against the B.1.617.2 variant spike peptides were detected in 31/59 participants. Two patients with prior immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adrenal insufficiency had symptomatic hypoadrenalism after vaccination., Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccinations are safe and immunogenic in patients with solid tumors, who developed similar antibody and T cell responses compared with HDs. Patients on B-cell directed therapies may fail to generate RBD antibodies after vaccination and should be considered for prophylactic antibody treatments. Many seronegative patients do develop a T cell response, which may have an anti-viral effect. Patients with pre-existing adrenal insufficiency may need to take stress dose steroids during vaccination to avoid adrenal crisis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: BAD participated in advisory boards for Janssen and Sanofi. PO received research funding/grants from NIH, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca/MedImmunce, Acerta Pharma, Janssen, Seagen, Astellas Pharma, and Bristol-Myers Squibb; consulting fees from Genentech/Roche, Merck, Astellas Pharma, Inc., Seagen, Atheneum Partners, First Word Publications, Health Advances, Janssen, Dedham Group, Pfizer, CLD, Axiom Healthcare Strategies, EMD Serono, IntrinsiQ Specialty Solutions; payment or honoraria from NAMCP, Med Learning Group, and Curio Science; support for meetings/travel from Seagen, Astellas Pharma, Inc., Genentech/Roche, and Janssen; participation in a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Janssen, Nektar, Dragonfly Therapeutics, G1 Therapeutics; and is a former stockholder of Allergan which was acquired by AbbVie. AJ participated in consulting and advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi-Aventis. KLH participated in consulting and advisory boards for Deciphera, BMS, Novocure, Seattle Genetics, Inventiva, AstraZeneca, Bluestar Genomics, and has clinical trial support paid to the institution from Bayer, BMS, Constellation, Deciphera, Inhibrx, Aduro, GSK, Harpoon, Polaris, Macrogenics, Seattle Genetics, Vivace, AstraZeneca, Merck, Roche. CMB participated in consulting, advisory board or speakers’ bureaus for AstraZeneca, BMS, CVS, Genetech, Jazz pharmaceuticals, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron/Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Merck and received research funding from AstraZeneca and Bristol Myers Squibb. TFG has participated in consulting or advisory boards for Merck, Jounce, Fog Pharma, Adaptimmune, Pyxis, Allogene, Catalym, Bicara, Maia, Samyang; has received research support from BMS, Merck, Seattle Genetics, Evelo, Bayer, Pyxis; has licensing or intellectual property agreements with Aduro, Evelo, and BMS; and is a cofounder or shareholder in Jounce and Pyxis., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are highly effective for multiple myeloma (MM) but their impressive efficacy is associated with treatment-related neurotoxicities in some patients. In CARTITUDE-1, 5% of patients with MM reported movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events (MNTs) with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. We assessed the associated factors for MNTs in CARTITUDE-1. Based on common features, patients who experienced MNTs were characterized by the presence of a combination of at least two variables: high tumor burden, grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or any grade immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after cilta-cel infusion, and high CAR T-cell expansion/persistence. Strategies were implemented across the cilta-cel development program to monitor and manage patients with MNTs, including enhanced bridging therapy to reduce baseline tumor burden, early aggressive treatment of CRS and ICANS, handwriting assessments for early symptom detection, and extended monitoring/reporting time for neurotoxicity beyond 100 days post-infusion. After successful implementation of these strategies, the incidence of MNTs was reduced from 5% to <1% across the cilta-cel program, supporting its favorable benefit-risk profile for treatment of MM., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

In patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), daratumumab reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 44% in MAIA (daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone [D-Rd]) and 58% in ALCYONE (daratumumab/bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [D-VMP]). Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a sensitive measure of disease and response to therapy. MRD-negativity status and durability were assessed in MAIA and ALCYONE. MRD assessments using next-generation sequencing (10-5) occurred for patients achieving complete response (CR) or better and after at least CR at 12, 18, 24, and 30 months from the first dose. Progression-free survival (PFS) by MRD status and sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥6 and ≥12 months were analyzed in the intent-to-treat population and among patients achieving at least CR. In MAIA (D-Rd, n = 368; lenalidomide and dexamethasone [Rd], n = 369) and ALCYONE (D-VMP, n = 350; bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone [VMP], n = 356), the median duration of follow-up was 36.4 and 40.1 months, respectively. MRD-negative status and sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥6 and ≥12 months were associated with improved PFS, regardless of treatment group. However, daratumumab-based therapy improved rates of MRD negativity lasting ≥6 months (D-Rd, 14.9% vs Rd, 4.3%; D-VMP, 15.7% vs VMP, 4.5%) and ≥12 months (D-Rd, 10.9% vs Rd, 2.4%; D-VMP, 14.0% vs VMP, 2.8%), both of which translated to improved PFS vs control groups. In a pooled analysis, patients who were MRD negative had improved PFS vs patients who were MRD positive. Patients with NDMM who achieved MRD-negative status or sustained MRD negativity had deep remission and improved clinical outcomes. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02252172 (MAIA) and #NCT02195479 (ALCYONE)., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

High risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) continues to portend worse outcomes despite the many advances in anti-myeloma therapeutics. The optimal approach to treatment is not clearly defined on account of the variable definitions of HRMM and the paucity of studies dedicated to the treatment of HRMM. In this review, we use a case-based approach to review the definitions of HRMM, and evaluate the evidence for induction, stem cell transplantation, and post-transplant therapy approaches for HRMM., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite recent advances in therapeutic options, there remains an unmet need for treating patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, especially in those previously exposed or refractory to lenalidomide. This updated efficacy and safety analysis from the phase 3 CANDOR study compared carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma., Methods: In this updated analysis of the randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 CANDOR study, patients (aged ≥18 years) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, at least a partial response to between one and three previous therapies, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, were recruited from 102 medical centres globally and randomly assigned (2:1) by interactive voice or web response software to receive KdD or Kd. Participants were stratified by disease stage, previous proteasome inhibitor or anti-CD38 antibody exposure, and number of previous therapies. All patients received intravenous infusions of carfilzomib twice per week at 56 mg/m 2 (20 mg/m 2 on days 1 and 2 during cycle 1) on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of each 28-day cycle. Daratumumab (8 mg/kg) was administered intravenously on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1 and at 16 mg/kg weekly for the remaining doses of the first two cycles, then every 2 weeks for four cycles (cycles 3-6), and every 4 weeks thereafter. Patients received 40 mg dexamethasone weekly (20 mg for patients >75 years old). This analysis was a preplanned interim analysis for overall survival; however, at the time of data cutoff, overall survival data were not mature. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Here, we provide updated progression-free survival data, assessed centrally by Onyx Response Computer Algorithm in the intention-to-treat population, with 11 months additional follow-up. Adverse events were assessed in the safety population, which included all participants who received at least one dose of trial treatment. CANDOR is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03158688, and is active but not recruiting., Findings: Between June 13, 2017, and June 25, 2018, 466 patients were enrolled, of whom 312 received KdD and 154 received Kd. At data cutoff (June 15, 2020), median follow-up was 27·8 months (IQR 25·6-29·5) for KdD and 27·0 months (13·2-28·6) for Kd. Median progression-free survival was 28·6 months (95% CI 22·7-not estimable [NE]) in the KdD group and 15·2 months (11·1-19·9) in the Kd group (hazard ratio 0·59 [95% CI 0·45-0·78], log-rank p<0·0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events in the safety population were consistent with the primary analysis. Grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 268 (87%) patients in the KdD group and 116 (76%) in the Kd group; most commonly thrombocytopenia (76 [25%] vs 25 [16%], respectively), hypertension (65 [21%] vs 23 [15%]), pneumonia (54 [18%] vs 14 [9%]), and anaemia (53 [17%] vs 23 [15%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 194 (63%) patients with KdD and 76 (50%) with Kd. Adverse events leading to death occurred in 27 (9%) patients in the KdD group and seven (5%) in the Kd group; most commonly septic shock (five [2%] vs one (1%]) and pneumonia (four [1%] vs none). No new treatment-related deaths have occurred since the primary analysis., Interpretation: A clear, maintained progression-free survival benefit of KdD over Kd with longer follow-up was confirmed, making KdD an emerging standard-of-care for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma., Funding: Amgen and Janssen., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SZU reports grants and personal fees from Amgen, Celgene, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Janssen, Takeda, SkylineDX, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees from AbbVie, MundiPharma, and Oncopeptides; and grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pharmacyclics. HQ reports grants (to institution) from Celgene, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, and Karyopharm; consultancy or membership (or both) on an advisory committee from Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Celgene, and Janssen; membership on an advisory committee from Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, Karyopharm, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Janssen; leadership or fiduciary role for GlaxoSmithKine, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Amgen; and receipt of free drug for investigator-initiated study from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Amgen, and Karyopharm. M-VM reports consulting fees from Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, Oncopeptides, Adaptive, Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche, and Bluebird-bio. OL reports honoraria or membership (or both) on the board of directors for Adaptive, Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda; and membership on independent data monitoring committees for Merck and Theradex. XL reports honoraria from Sanofi, Takeda, Oncopeptide, Karyopharm, Amgen, Carsgen, Incyte, Novartis, Celgene, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and AbbVie. DS reports honoraria fees and speakers' bureau fees for Novartis, Karyopharm, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, and Celgene; consulting fees and membership on the Board of Directors or advisory committees for Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, Celularity, and Celgene; research funding from Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Amgen, and Celgene. KW reports consultancy fees from Janssen, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Takeda, Oncopeptides, Karyopharm, GlaxoSmithKline, and Celgene; honoraria for speakers' bureaus from Janssen, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Sanofi, Takeda, and GlaxoSmithKline; and grants or contracts (to institution) from Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, and Sanofi. AO reports consultancy fees from Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline; speakers bureau fees from Celgene and Amgen; and fees for participation on advisory boards for Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Amgen, and GlaxoSmithKline. NR reports consulting fees from Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, and Karyopharm; payment or honoraria for speakers' bureaus from Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda; travel support from Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda; and participation on advisory boards for Celgene, Amgen, Takeda, and Karyopharm. AN reports consultancy or membership (or both) on an advisory committee for Bristol Myers Squibb, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Celgene, Sanofi, Oncopep, Takeda, Karyopharm, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen. MQ reports employment with and stockholdings of Janssen R&D. MB reports advisory board or speakers bureau fees from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, and Takeda. AJ reports honoraria for advisory board participation and consulting from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, and Sanofi-Aventis. BD made contributions to this publication while employed by Amgen. AZ-K and AY report employment with and equity ownership in Amgen. MD reports consulting fees from Janssen, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Beigene; payment or honoraria for speakers bureaus from Beigene, Janssen, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Takeda; and grants or contracts from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, and Beigene. MG declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Proteins in the antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) family play a role in the pathophysiology of multiple myeloma (MM). Venetoclax is a highly selective, potent, oral BCL-2 inhibitor that induces apoptosis of MM cells, and its efficacy may be potentiated through combination with agents that increase BCL-2 dependency or have complementary mechanisms of action. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of venetoclax in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (VenKd) in adults with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) were investigated in this phase 2 dose-escalation study. Oral venetoclax (400 or 800 mg) was administered daily in combination with intravenous carfilzomib (27, 56, or 70 mg/m2) and oral dexamethasone (20 or 40 mg) in 4 dose-finding cohorts. The expansion cohort received venetoclax 800 mg, carfilzomib 70 mg/m2, and dexamethasone 40 mg. Forty-nine patients received treatment. Median prior lines of therapy was 1 (range, 1-3), and median time in the study was 27 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (65%), fatigue (47%), nausea (47%), and lymphopenia (35%). Serious adverse events occurred in 26 (53%) patients. Of 3 treatment-emergent deaths, 1 was considered treatment related. The overall response rate was 80% in all patients, 92% in patients with t(11;14) (n = 13), and 75% in patients without (n = 36). The rate of complete response or better was 41%. Median progression-free survival was 22.8 months. Treatment with VenKd was well tolerated and showed promising response rates in this RRMM patient population, with greater responses observed in patients with t(11;14). This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02899052., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Combination therapy regimens containing a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and a steroid are an established standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) regardless of transplant eligibility. Triplet regimens that include lenalidomide/dexamethasone combined with daratumumab or carfilzomib are highly active in multiple myeloma, including NDMM. The aim of this open-label, phase 1b study was to evaluate daratumumab in combination with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-KRd) in patients with NDMM., Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 22), regardless of transplant eligibility, received treatment with D-KRd for up to thirteen 28-day cycles or until autologous stem cell transplant. The first daratumumab dose was administered as a split infusion (8 mg/kg on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1). The primary end point was safety and tolerability., Results: A total of 10 patients discontinued treatment, most frequently because of elective autologous stem cell transplant (n = 8). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (any grade; grade 3/4) were diarrhea (68%; 18%), lymphopenia (64%; 59%), cough (59%; 5%), and upper respiratory tract infection (55%; 0%). Stem cell collection was successful in most patients (91%). Daratumumab infusion-related reactions occurred in 9 (41%) patients, primarily during the first infusion, and were mild in severity (no grade 3/4 events). The best overall response rate was 95%, including 86% with a very good partial response or better and 67% with a complete response or better., Conclusion: D-KRd was well tolerated, and encouraging efficacy results support further investigation of daratumumab-based quadruplet therapies for NDMM., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest A.J. served on an advisory board and consulted for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Juno, Karyopharm, Sanofi, and Takeda. S.Z.U. served in a consulting or advisory role for Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene, MundiPharma, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Janssen, Takeda, and SkylineDx and received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pharmacyclics. A.K. served as a consultant for Janssen and Celgene; was a member of a speaker's bureau for Janssen, Sutro, Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and Celgene; and holds equity in Celgene. S.L. received honoraria from Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Amgen. R.L.C. received research funding from Takeda, Janssen, and Karyopharm and is a scientific advisor for Takeda, Prothena, Caelum, and Janssen. B.M.W. reports research funding from Janssen during the course of the study, current employment with Janssen Research & Development LLC, and equity ownership in Johnson & Johnson. J.W. is an employee of Janssen. C.d.B., W.D., and J.M.S. are employees of Janssen and have equity ownership in Johnson & Johnson. A.C. received research funding from, served on an advisory board for, and consulted for Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, and Amgen; received research funding from and served on an advisory board for Seattle Genetics; received research funding from and consulted for Millennium/Takeda; received research funding from Pharmacyclics; served on an advisory board for Karyopharm, Sanofi, and Oncopeptides; and consulted for Bristol Myers Squibb and Antegene., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: CARTITUDE-1 aimed to assess the safety and clinical activity of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy with two B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma with poor prognosis., Methods: This single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 study done at 16 centres in the USA enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, who received 3 or more previous lines of therapy or were double-refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug, and had received a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0·75 × 10 6 CAR-positive viable T cells per kg) was administered 5-7 days after start of lymphodepletion. The primary endpoints were safety and confirmation of the recommended phase 2 dose (phase 1b), and overall response rate (phase 2) in all patients who received treatment. Key secondary endpoints were duration of response and progression-free survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03548207., Findings: Between July 16, 2018, and Oct 7, 2019, 113 patients were enrolled. 97 patients (29 in phase 1b and 68 in phase 2) received a cilta-cel infusion at the recommended phase 2 dose of 0·75 × 10 6 CAR-positive viable T cells per kg. As of the Sept 1, 2020 clinical cutoff, median follow-up was 12·4 months (IQR 10·6-15·2). 97 patients with a median of six previous therapies received cilta-cel. Overall response rate was 97% (95% CI 91·2-99·4; 94 of 97 patients); 65 (67%) achieved stringent complete response; time to first response was 1 month (IQR 0·9-1·0). Responses deepened over time. Median duration of response was not reached (95% CI 15·9-not estimable), neither was progression-free survival (16·8-not estimable). The 12-month progression-free rate was 77% (95% CI 66·0-84·3) and overall survival rate was 89% (80·2-93·5). Haematological adverse events were common; grade 3-4 haematological adverse events were neutropenia (92 [95%] of 97 patients), anaemia (66 [68%]), leukopenia (59 [61%]), thrombocytopenia (58 [60%]), and lymphopenia (48 [50%]). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 92 (95%) of 97 patients (4% were grade 3 or 4); with median time to onset of 7·0 days (IQR 5-8) and median duration of 4·0 days (IQR 3-6). Cytokine release syndrome resolved in all except one with grade 5 cytokine release syndrome and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. CAR T-cell neurotoxicity occurred in 20 (21%) patients (9% were grade 3 or 4). 14 deaths occurred in the study; six due to treatment-related adverse events, five due to progressive disease, and three due to treatment-unrelated adverse events., Interpretation: A single cilta-cel infusion at the target dose of 0·75 × 10 6 CAR-positive viable T cells per kg led to early, deep, and durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma with a manageable safety profile. The data from this study formed the basis for recent regulatory submissions., Funding: Janssen Research & Development and Legend Biotech., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JGB receives research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Acetylon, Bluebird, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cellularity, Constellation, CRISPR Therapeutics, CURIS, EMD Serono, Genentech, Glenmark, Janssen, Kesios, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida, Teva, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Vivolux, and is a consultant for Amgen, Bioclinica, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, CRISPR Therapeutics, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kite Pharma, Legend, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and SecuraBio. DM is a consultant for and receives honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, Foundation Medicine, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Legend, Takeda, and Kinevant, and is a member of the Board of Directors or advisory committee and part of the Speaker's Bureau for GlaxoSmithKline, Legend, and Kinevant. SZU is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Array Biopharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, SkylineDX, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; receives honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, MundiPharma, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; receives speaking fees from Amgen, Janssen, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and receives research funding from Amgen, Array Biopharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, SkylineDX, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. AJ receives consulting fees and honoraria from AbbVie, Adaptive, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Juno, Karyopharm, and Sanofi, and is a member of the Board of Directors or advisory committee for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, and Sanofi. ADC reports personal fees from Janssen, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Seattle Genetics, Kite Pharma, and Oncopeptides, and personal fees and grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis. AKS receives honoraria from Aventis, Janssen, Amgen, Oncopeptides, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi, and is a member of the Board of Directors or advisory committee for Genomics England and Tempus. PH receives consulting fees and honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Kite, Sanofi Genzyme, Spectrum, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; receives research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Sanofi Genzyme, and Spectrum. MH is a current employee of City of Hope Medical Center. AD is a consultant for Novartis and Kite, a Gilead Company. AL receives consulting fees and honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, GenMab, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Amgen, and Boehringer Ingelheim; receives research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Pfizer, Trillium, and Janssen; and receives royalties from patents from Serametrix. IS was an employee of Janssen at the time the study was conducted, and is a current employee of Gilead Sciences. EZ, T-MY, AJA, YO, AB, JDG, JMS, WD, SHZ, and JI are employed by Janssen. CCJ is employed by Janssen, and is a consultant physician at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY, USA). DG, XW, and MAk are employed by Legend Biotech. MJC-A was an employee of Legend Biotech at the time the study was conducted, and owns stock in Adaptimmune Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Atara Biotherapeutics, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, BioNTech, Bluebird Bio, Cellectis, CRISPR Therapeutics, Editas Medicine, Fate Therapeutics, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Intellia Therapeutics, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech, Moderna Therapeutics, NantKwest, Neon Therapeutics, Novartis, AG Pharma, Sana Biotechnology, Sangamo Therapeutics, Sorrento Therapeutics, Tcr2 Therapeutics, Verstem Oncology, and Ziopharm Oncology. FH was an employee of Legend Biotech at the time the study was conducted, and is a current employee of Genentech. SR was an employee of Legend Biotech at the time the study was conducted. FF is employed by Nanjing Legend Biotechnology. YL is a consultant for Bluebird Bio, Celgene, Gamida Cells, Janssen, Huno, Kite, Novartis, Sorrento, Legend BioTech, and Vineti, and receives research funding from Bluebird Bio, Celgene, Janssen, Kite, Merck, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. TM receives research funding from Janssen. SJ is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, Sanofi, Legend Biotech, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. MAg, EO'D, NCM, and DA declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the phase III ALCYONE trial, daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) significantly improved overall response rate and progression-free status compared with VMP alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). Here, we present patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from ALCYONE., Methods: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30-item (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire were administered at baseline, every 3 months (year 1) and every 6 months (until progression). Treatment effects were assessed using a repeated-measures, mixed-effects model., Results: Compliance with PRO assessments was comparable at baseline (> 90%) and throughout study (> 76%) for both treatment groups. Improvements from baseline were observed in both groups for EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status (GHS), most functional scales, symptom scales and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS). Between-group differences were significant for GHS (p = 0.0240) and VAS (p = 0.0160) at month 3. Improvements in pain were clinically meaningful in both groups at all assessment time points. Cognitive function declined in both groups, but the magnitude of the decline was not clinically meaningful., Conclusions: Patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM demonstrated early and continuous improvements in health-related quality of life, including improvements in functioning and symptoms, following treatment with D-VMP or VMP., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02195479 , registered September 21, 2014.

Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) demonstrated deep and durable responses in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in DREAMM-2 (NCT03525678). Corneal events, specifically keratopathy (including superficial punctate keratopathy and/or microcyst-like epithelial changes (MECs), eye examination findings with/without symptoms), were common, consistent with reports from other antibody-drug conjugates. Given the novel nature of corneal events in RRMM management, guidelines are required for their prompt identification and appropriate management. Eye examination findings from DREAMM-2 and insights from hematology/oncology investigators and ophthalmologists, including corneal specialists, were collated and used to develop corneal event management guidelines. The following recommendations were formulated: close collaboration among hematologist/oncologists and eye care professionals is needed, in part, to provide optimal care in relation to the belamaf benefit-risk profile. Patients receiving belamaf should undergo eye examinations before and during every treatment cycle and promptly upon worsening of symptoms. Severity of corneal events should be determined based on corneal examination findings and changes in best-corrected visual acuity. Treatment decisions, including dose modifications, should be based on the most severe finding present. These guidelines are recommended for the assessment and management of belamaf-associated ocular events to help mitigate ocular risk and enable patients to continue to experience a clinical benefit with belamaf.

Introduction: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) represent an unmet clinical need. Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf; GSK2857916) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC; or immunoconjugate) that delivers a cytotoxic payload, monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF), to myeloma cells. In the phase II DREAMM-2 study (NCT03525678), single-agent belamaf (2.5 mg/kg) demonstrated clinically meaningful anti-myeloma activity (overall response rate 32%) in patients with heavily pretreated disease. Microcyst-like epithelial changes (MECs) were common, consistent with reports from other MMAF-containing ADCs., Methods: Corneal examination findings from patients in DREAMM-2 were reviewed, and the clinical descriptions and accompanying images (slit lamp microscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy [IVCM]) of representative events were selected. A literature review on corneal events reported with other ADCs was performed., Results: In most patients receiving single-agent belamaf (72%; 68/95), MECs were observed by slit lamp microscopy early in treatment (69% had their first event by dose 4). However, IVCM revealed hyperreflective material. Blurred vision (25%) and dry eye (15%) were commonly reported symptoms. Management of MECs included dose delays (47%)/reductions (25%), with few patients discontinuing due to MECs (1%). The first event resolved in most patients (grade ≥2 MECs and visual acuity [each 77%], blurred vision [67%], and dry eye [86%]), with no reports of permanent vision loss to date. A literature review confirmed that similar MECs were reported with other ADCs; however, event management strategies varied. The pathophysiology of MECs is unclear, though the ADC cytotoxic payload may contribute to on- or off-target effects on corneal epithelial cells., Conclusion: Single-agent belamaf represents a new treatment option for patients with RRMM. As with other ADCs, MECs were observed and additional research is warranted to determine their pathophysiology. A multidisciplinary approach, involving close collaboration between eye care professionals and hematologist/oncologists, is needed to determine appropriate diagnosis and management of these patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT03525678.

Selinexor is an oral, small molecule inhibitor of the nuclear export protein exportin 1 with demonstrated activity in hematologic and solid malignancies. Side effects associated with selinexor include nausea, vomiting, fatigue, diarrhea, decreased appetite, weight loss, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and hyponatremia. We reviewed 437 patients with multiple myeloma treated with selinexor and assessed the kinetics of adverse events and impact of supportive care measures. Selinexor reduced both platelets and neutrophils over the first cycle of treatment and reached a nadir between 28 and 42 days. Platelet transfusions and thrombopoietin receptor agonists were effective at treating thrombocytopenia, and granulocyte colony stimulating factors were effective at resolving neutropenia. The onset of gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) was most common during the first 1-2 weeks of treatment. Nausea could be mitigated with 5-HT3 antagonists and either neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists, olanzapine, or cannbainoids. Loperamide and bismuth subsalicylate ameliorated diarrhea. The primary constitutional side effects of fatigue and decreased appetite could be managed with methylphenidate, megestrol, cannabinoids or olanzapine, respectively. Hyponatremia was highly responsive to sodium replacement. Selinexor has well-established adverse effects that mainly occur within the first 8 weeks of treatment, are reversible, and respond to supportive care.

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible NDMM patients was evaluated. Patients (N = 207) were randomized 1:1 to D-RVd or RVd induction (4 cycles), ASCT, D-RVd or RVd consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus D maintenance (26 cycles). The primary end point, stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation, favored D-RVd vs RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P = .068) and met the prespecified 1-sided α of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses deepened; sCR rates improved for D-RVd vs RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P = .0177), as did minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10-5 threshold) rates in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P < .0001). Four patients (3.8%) in the D-RVd group and 7 patients (6.8%) in the RVd group progressed; respective 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% and 89.8%. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but grade 3/4 infection rates were similar. Median CD34+ cell yield was 8.2 × 106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 × 106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common with D-RVd. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were comparable. Daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Introduction: Bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) is the standard of care for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The phase III VISTA trial established the bortezomib dosing schedule for VMP. To mitigate bortezomib-associated toxicity, the phase III ALCYONE study of daratumumab plus VMP (D-VMP) versus VMP used modified bortezomib dosing. D-VMP demonstrated improved progression-free survival and overall response rate. Propensity score matching enables indirect comparisons by controlling for differences in baseline covariates., Patients and Methods: The efficacy and safety of both arms of ALCYONE were compared with VISTA VMP using propensity score matching. ALCYONE D-VMP and VMP patients were matched on selected baseline characteristics to VISTA VMP patients, reducing or eliminating systematic differences between treatment groups., Results: After matching, median progression-free survival and overall response rate were comparable for ALCYONE VMP and VISTA VMP, and were significantly improved with ALCYONE D-VMP versus VISTA VMP. Rates of grade 3/4 peripheral sensory neuropathy were significantly lower for both arms of ALCYONE versus VISTA VMP, with or without matching., Conclusion: This propensity score matching analysis demonstrates significant improvements in efficacy with ALCYONE D-VMP versus VISTA VMP and a significantly lower incidence of peripheral sensory neuropathy in both arms of ALCYONE versus VISTA VMP, although safety improvements may be due to different bortezomib administration routes (ALCYONE, subcutaneous; VISTA, intravenous)., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Daratumumab, a human immunoglobulin Gκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, is approved as monotherapy and in combination with standard-of-care regimens for multiple myeloma. In clinical studies, the median durations of the first, second, and subsequent intravenous infusions of daratumumab were 7.0, 4.3, and 3.4 h, respectively. Splitting the first intravenous infusion of daratumumab over 2 days is an approved alternative dosing regimen to reduce the duration of the first infusion and provide flexibility for patients and healthcare providers., Methods: The feasibility of splitting the first 16-mg/kg infusion into two separate infusions of 8 mg/kg on Days 1 and 2 of the first treatment cycle was investigated in two cohorts [daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (D-Kd) and daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-KRd)] of the phase 1b MMY1001 study. Additionally, a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and simulations were used to compare the PK profiles of the split first dose regimen with the recommended single first dose regimens of daratumumab in previously approved indications., Results: In MMY1001, following administration of the second half of a split first dose on Cycle 1 Day 2, postinfusion median (range) daratumumab concentrations were similar between split first dose [D-Kd, 254.9 (125.8-435.5) µg/ml; D-KRd, 277.2 (164.0-341.8) µg/ml; combined, 256.8 (125.8-435.5) µg/ml] and single first dose [D-Kd, 319.2 (237.5-394.7) µg/ml]. At the end of weekly dosing, median (range) Cycle 3 Day 1 preinfusion daratumumab concentrations were similar between split first dose [D-Kd, 663.9 (57.7-1110.7) µg/ml; D-KRd, 575.1 (237.9-825.5) µg/ml; combined, 639.2 (57.7-1110.7) µg/ml] and single first dose [D-Kd, 463.2 (355.9-792.9) µg/ml]. The population PK simulations demonstrated virtually identical PK profiles after the first day of treatment for all approved indications and recommended dosing schedules of daratumumab., Conclusion: These data support the use of an alternative split first dose regimen of intravenous daratumumab for the treatment of MM., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01998971.

Background: Standard-of-care treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma includes combination therapies for patients who are not eligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. At the primary analysis for progression-free survival of the phase 3 ALCYONE trial, progression-free survival was significantly longer with daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) alone in patients with transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here we report updated efficacy and safety results from a prespecified, interim, overall survival analysis of ALCYONE with more than 36 months of follow-up., Methods: ALCYONE was a multicentre, randomised, open-label, active-controlled, phase 3 trial that enrolled patients between Feb 9, 2015, and July 14, 2016, at 162 sites in 25 countries across North America, South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and were ineligible for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation, because of their age (≥65 years) or because of substantial comorbidities. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and by permuted block randomisation to receive D-VMP or VMP. An interactive web-based randomisation system was used. Randomisation was stratified by International Staging System disease stage, geographical region, and age. There was no masking to treatment assignments. All patients received up to nine 6-week cycles of subcutaneous bortezomib (1·3 mg/m 2 of body surface area on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 of cycle one and on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of cycles two through nine), oral melphalan (9 mg/m 2 once daily on days 1 through 4 of each cycle), and oral prednisone (60 mg/m 2 once daily on days 1 through 4 of each cycle). Patients in the D-VMP group also received intravenous daratumumab (16 mg/kg of bodyweight, once weekly during cycle one, once every 3 weeks in cycles two through nine, and once every 4 weeks thereafter as maintenance therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which has been reported previously. Results presented are from a prespecified interim analysis for overall survival. The primary analysis population (including for overall survival) was the intention-to-treat population of all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment. The safety population included patients who received any dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02195479., Findings: 706 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (350 to the D-VMP group, 356 to the VMP group). At a median follow-up of 40·1 months (IQR 37·4-43·1), a significant benefit in overall survival was observed for the D-VMP group. The hazard ratio (HR) for death in the D-VMP group compared with the VMP group was 0·60 (95% CI 0·46-0·80; p=0·0003). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 36-month rate of overall survival was 78·0% (95% CI 73·2-82·0) in the D-VMP group and 67·9% (62·6-72·6) in the VMP group. Progression-free survival, the primary endpoint, remained significantly improved for the D-VMP group (HR 0·42 [0·34-0·51]; p<0·0001). The most frequent adverse events during maintenance daratumumab monotherapy in patients in the D-VMP group were respiratory infections (54 [19%] of 278 patients had upper respiratory tract infections; 42 [15%] had bronchitis, 34 [12%] had viral upper respiratory tract infections), cough (34 [12%]), and diarrhoea (28 [10%])., Interpretation: D-VMP prolonged overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. With more than 3 years of follow-up, the D-VMP group continued to show significant improvement in progression-free survival, with no new safety concerns., Funding: Janssen Research & Development., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Progression after high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) may be due in part to immune dysfunction. Regulatory T (Treg) cells reconstitute rapidly after ASCT and inhibit immune responses against myeloma cells., Methods: We performed a randomized study to evaluate two methods of Treg depletion in patients with MM undergoing ASCT. No Treg depletion was performed in the control ASCT arm. An anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (basiliximab 20 mg IV) was administered on day +1 post-ASCT in the in vivo Treg depletion (IVTRD) arm. Tregs were depleted from autologous stem cell (ASC) grafts with anti-CD25 microbeads and the CliniMACS device in the ex vivo Treg depletion (EVTRD) arm., Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled, five in each arm. The conditioning regimen was melphalan 200 mg/m 2 . Primary objectives included assessments of efficiency of IVTRD/EVTRD, kinetics of Treg depletion and recovery following ASCT, and safety. EVTRD removed 90% of CD4 + CD25 + cells from ASC grafts. IVTRD and EVTRD led to reductions in Treg frequency between days +7 and +90 post-transplant compared with the control (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: IVTRD and EVTRD are feasible and significantly reduce and delay Treg recovery post-ASCT for MM, and serve as a platform for using post-transplant immunotherapies to improve post-ASCT outcomes., Trial Registration Number: NCT01526096., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AJJ serves on the advisory boards of Amgen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, and SkylineDX, and serves as a consultant for Abbvie. TMZ is an employee of Abbvie. MRB serves on the advisory boards of Celgene, CRISPR Therapeutics, Juno, Kite Pharma, Pharmacyclics, Seattle Genetics, and United Healthcare and serves as a consultant for Kite Pharma. JK receives honoraria from Kite, Merck, and Seattle Genetics, and receives research funding from iTeos and Merck., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Carfilzomib, a selective proteasome inhibitor (PI), is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Combination regimens incorporating a PI and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) have been associated with deep responses and extended survival in patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). Carfilzomib-based combinations with immunomodulators are being extensively studied in the frontline setting. The objective of this review was to describe efficacy and safety data for carfilzomib-based, PI/immunomodulatory combinations in NDMM. Information sources were articles indexed in PubMed and abstracts from key hematology/oncology congresses published between January 2012 and December 2018. PubMed and congresses were searched for prospective clinical studies assessing the combination of carfilzomib with an IMiD for NDMM treatment. Retrospective and preclinical reports, case reports/series, reviews, and clinical studies not evaluating carfilzomib-immunomodulator combinations in NDMM were excluded based on review of titles and abstracts. A total of nine articles and 72 abstracts were deemed relevant and included in the review. A total of six distinct carfilzomib-based, PI/immunomodulator combination regimens have been evaluated in 12 clinical trials. Overall, treatment with these regimens has resulted in deep responses, including high rates of negativity for minimal residual disease. These deep responses have translated to long progression-free survival and overall survival rates. Efficacy results for these regimens have generally been consistent across subgroups defined by age, transplant eligibility, and cytogenetic risk. The safety profile of carfilzomib in NDMM is consistent with that observed in the relapsed-refractory MM setting. Clinical studies have found that carfilzomib-based combinations with immunomodulators are highly active with a favorable safety profile in NDMM. The carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) drug backbone is a promising foundation for treatment strategies aimed at achieving long-term, deep responses (functional cures) in the frontline setting. Several ongoing studies are evaluating KRd, with or without anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies.

Purpose: The oral proteasome inhibitor oprozomib has shown preclinical antitumor activity. Here, we report phase Ib/II study results investigating single-agent oprozomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and Waldenström macroglobulinemia., Patients and Methods: The primary objectives were to determine the MTD, safety, and tolerability of oprozomib (phase Ib) as well as overall response rate (ORR; phase II). Oprozomib was administered once daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9 (2/7 schedule) or days 1 to 5 (5/14 schedule) of a 14-day cycle., Results: In patients with multiple myeloma or Waldenström macroglobulinemia ( n = 71), the determined MTDs were 300 mg/day (2/7 schedule) and 240 mg/day (5/14 schedule). Median oprozomib treatment duration for patients with multiple myeloma was 11.4 weeks (2/7 schedule, 240/300 mg/day), 5.4 weeks (5/14, 240 mg/day), and 10.1 weeks (5/14, 150/180 mg/day). For patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia, these values were 34.6 weeks (2/7 schedule, 240/300 mg/day) and 8.1 weeks (5/14 schedule, 240 mg/day). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events (AE) in phase Ib included gastrointestinal and hematologic AEs. Three AE-related deaths in phase II prompted enrollment into 2/7 and 5/14 step-up dosing schedules (240/300 mg/day and 150/180 mg/day, respectively). In phase II, ORRs in 95 response-eligible multiple myeloma patients were 41.0%, 28.1%, and 25.0% in the 2/7, 240/300-mg/day; 5/14, 150/180-mg/day; and 5/14, 240-mg/day cohorts, respectively. ORRs in 31 response-eligible Waldenström macroglobulinemia patients were 71.4% and 47.1% for the 2/7 and 5/14 cohorts, respectively., Conclusions: This study demonstrated promising efficacy of single-agent oprozomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and Waldenström macroglobulinemia., (©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have limited treatment options and poor survival outcomes. The increasing adoption of lenalidomide-based therapy for frontline treatment of multiple myeloma has resulted in a need for effective regimens for lenalidomide-refractory patients. This phase 1b study evaluated daratumumab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone (D-Kd) in patients with RRMM after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug; lenalidomide-refractory patients were eligible. Carfilzomib- and daratumumab-naïve patients (n = 85) received carfilzomib weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle (20 mg/m 2 initial dose, escalated to 70 mg/m 2 thereafter) and dexamethasone (40 mg/wk). Of these, 10 patients received the first daratumumab dose as a single infusion (16 mg/kg, day 1 cycle 1), and 75 patients received a split first dose (8 mg/kg, days 1-2 cycle 1). Subsequent dosing was per the approved schedule for daratumumab. Patients received a median of 2 (range, 1-4) prior lines of therapy; 60% were lenalidomide refractory. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31%), lymphopenia (24%), anemia (21%), and neutropenia (21%). Infusion-related reactions were observed in 60% and 43% of single and split first-dose patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 84% (79% in lenalidomide-refractory patients). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached; 12-month PFS rates were 74% for all treated patients and 65% for lenalidomide-refractory patients. D-Kd was well tolerated with low neutropenia rates, and it demonstrated deep responses and encouraging PFS, including in patients refractory to lenalidomide. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01998971., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose Selinexor, a first-in-class, oral, selective exportin 1 (XPO1) inhibitor, induces apoptosis in cancer cells through nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins and the glucocorticoid receptor, along with inhibition of translation of oncoprotein mRNAs. We studied selinexor in combination with low-dose dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma refractory to the most active available agents. Patients and Methods This phase II trial evaluated selinexor 80 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg, both orally and twice weekly, in patients with myeloma refractory to bortezomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide (quad-refractory disease), with a subset also refractory to an anti-CD38 antibody (penta-refractory disease). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Results Of 79 patients, 48 had quad-refractory and 31 had penta-refractory myeloma. Patients had received a median of seven prior regimens. The ORR was 21% and was similar for patients with quad-refractory (21%) and penta-refractory (20%) disease. Among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p), the ORR was 35% (six of 17 patients). The median duration of response was 5 months, and 65% of responding patients were alive at 12 months. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (59%), anemia (28%), neutropenia (23%), hyponatremia (22%), leukopenia (15%), and fatigue (15%). Dose interruptions for adverse events occurred in 41 patients (52%), dose reductions occurred in 29 patients (37%), and treatment discontinuation occurred in 14 patients (18%). Conclusion The combination of selinexor and dexamethasone has an ORR of 21% in patients with heavily pretreated, refractory myeloma with limited therapeutic options.

Purpose In the ASPIRE study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) versus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, progression-free survival was significantly improved in the carfilzomib group (hazard ratio, 0.69; two-sided P < .001). This prespecified analysis reports final overall survival (OS) data and updated safety results. Patients and Methods Adults with relapsed multiple myeloma (one to three prior lines of therapy) were eligible and randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive KRd or Rd in 28-day cycles until withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. After 18 cycles, all patients received Rd only. Progression-free survival was the primary end point; OS was a key secondary end point. OS was compared between treatment arms using a stratified log-rank test. Results Median OS was 48.3 months (95% CI, 42.4 to 52.8 months) for KRd versus 40.4 months (95% CI, 33.6 to 44.4 months) for Rd (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; one-sided P = .0045). In patients receiving one prior line of therapy, median OS was 11.4 months longer for KRd versus Rd; it was 6.5 months longer for KRd versus Rd among patients receiving ≥ two prior lines of therapy. Rates of treatment discontinuation because of adverse events (AEs) were 19.9% (KRd) and 21.5% (Rd). Grade ≥ 3 AE rates were 87.0% (KRd) and 83.3% (Rd). Selected grade ≥ 3 AEs of interest (grouped terms; KRd v Rd) included acute renal failure (3.8% v 3.3%), cardiac failure (4.3% v 2.1%), ischemic heart disease (3.8% v 2.3%), hypertension (6.4% v 2.3%), hematopoietic thrombocytopenia (20.2% v 14.9%), and peripheral neuropathy (2.8% v 3.1%). Conclusion KRd demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of death versus Rd, improving survival by 7.9 months. The KRd efficacy advantage is most pronounced at first relapse.