Search

Objective: To determine if there is a difference in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) among 3 anatomic body positions (right lateral, left lateral, and sternal recumbence) in apparently healthy dogs., Design: Prospective, observational study., Setting: University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital., Animals: Fourteen apparently healthy male dogs., Measurements and Main Results: After mild sedation with dexmedetomidine, a water manometer attached to a Foley urinary catheter was used to measure IAP in 3 different body positions in each dog. There was no significant difference in IAP between right lateral (3.87± 3.16 cm H 2 O), left lateral (4.45 ± 3.22 cm H 2 O), and sternal recumbence (4.04 ± 3.57 cm H 2 O)., Conclusions: Based on data from these 14 apparently healthy dogs, these 3 body positions can be used interchangeably for monitoring an individual dog. However, more research in dogs is needed to see if this conclusion holds true when IAP is abnormal., (© Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2020.)

Objective: To establish a reference interval for plasma lactate in a population of healthy adult cats on a laboratory analyzer (Nova Biomedical Critical Care Xpress [CCX]) and 2 commercially available point-of-care (POC) analyzers (Abbott i-STAT [i-STAT] and Nova Biomedical Lactate Plus [LP]), and to compare the level of agreement of lactate measurement between the laboratory analyzer and POC analyzers., Design: Prospective observational study., Setting: University veterinary teaching hospital., Animals: Forty-seven healthy adult cats., Interventions: Jugular phlebotomy., Measurements and Main Results: In this population, plasma lactate reference interval was 0.67-5.44 mmol/L for the CCX, 0.65-5.16 mmol/L for the i-STAT, and 0.68-4.39 mmol/L for the LP. Comparisons were made between lactate measurements on 2 point-of-care analyzers and the laboratory analyzer using the Bland-Altman method. For the comparison of CCX and i-STAT, the bias was -0.10 mmol/L; for the CCX and LP, the bias was -0.24 mmol/L., Conclusions: Measurements of plasma lactate in cats using the i-STAT showed acceptable agreement with the CCX. The LP showed weaker agreement. However, both POC analyzers are suitable for measurement of lactate in cats, provided results from different POC analyzers are not directly compared. This study identified a larger reference interval for plasma lactate concentration in cats than what has been previously reported., (© Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2015.)

Objective: To establish reference intervals for whole blood and plasma colloid osmotic pressure (COP) in healthy cats between the ages of 1 and 10 years using a cage-side colloid osmometer., Design: Prospective, observational study., Settings: University veterinary teaching hospital., Animals: Sixty-three healthy cats., Interventions: Phlebotomy., Measurements and Main Results: Whole blood COP mean was 24.4 (±2.78) mmHg and plasma COP mean was 24.3 (±2.59) mmHg. Reference interval for our study population of feline whole blood COP was 18.9 to 30.4 mmHg, and for our study population of feline plasma COP was 18.3 to 30.8 mmHg. Difference of paired whole blood COP and plasma COP was +0.23 ± 1.68 mmHg (P = 0.32). There was no significant difference when comparing COP from neutered male and neutered female cats. Total protein and albumin were significantly correlated with whole blood COP (total protein to whole blood COP P < 0.0001, r = 0.53; albumin to whole blood COP P <0.0001, r = 0.68) and plasma COP (total protein to plasma COP P = 0.0025, r = 0.41; albumin to plasma COP P < 0.0001, r = 0.66)., Conclusions: No significant difference was found between mean whole blood and plasma COP in this study population of cats. Even though not statistically significant, evaluation of paired whole blood COP and plasma COP did reveal a slight difference; therefore, it seems prudent to maintain sample consistency for serial evaluations in cats., (© Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2014.)

Experiences of obesity stigmatization and fear of fat, body image and self-esteem, were examined in relation to weight loss and weight maintenance. Participants in obesity treatment (N = 185) with more stigmatizing experiences had poorer body image and greater fear of fat. Higher initial BMI, more stigmatizing experiences, lower body dissatisfaction and greater fear of fat predicted greater weight loss. Higher initial BMI and more stigmatizing experiences predicted greater weight maintenance after six months in treatment. These findings suggest that despite the negative psychological correlates of stigmatization, experience and fear of obesity's negative consequences may also be associated with improved treatment outcome.

Objective: Obesity is increasingly considered a chronic disease requiring continuing care, but professional long-term treatment for most patients is not available. This study examined treatment recipients' perception of the effectiveness of different components of a group self-help, continuing-care treatment program for obesity., Research Methods and Procedures: Members (n = 120) and volunteer leaders (n = 66) of a self-help, continuing-care treatment program of previously demonstrated effectiveness (mean treatment duration, 40.6 months; mean weight lost, 14.1 kg) rated how helpful and effective they found the various therapeutic strategies used by this program. The strategies examined were continuing care, group support, behavior therapy, motivational enhancement strategies involving positive reinforcement, and motivational enhancement strategies involving punishment., Results: The single most highly valued aspect of treatment was the provision of continuing care, followed by group support. Greater success at achieving one's goal weight was associated with perceptions of greater effectiveness of the program's strategies overall (r = 0.219, p < 0.005), of continuing care (r = 0.225, p < 0.005), and of positive reinforcement strategies (r = 0.223, p < 0.01). Participants who had successfully attained their goal weight perceived behavior therapy strategies as more effective than did participants who had not reached their goal weight [t(170) = 2.93, p < 0.005]., Discussion: The high ratings given to continuing care and group support strategies indicate the acceptability of supportive self-help treatment for obesity administered over the long term. The findings suggest that continuing care and group support should be made available to participants in the self-help treatment of obesity.

Background & Aims: Pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-IFN-alfa 2b ) has been shown to provide superior efficacy to IFN-alfa 2b in patients with chronic hepatitis C (predominantly genotype 1) infection as measured by viral clearance. This study was conducted to determine the optimal dosing regimen of PEG-IFN-alfa 2b required to obtain a maximum decrease of hepatitis C viral RNA., Methods: This was a 24-week, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, active-controlled trial in the United Kingdom, France, and Israel. Individuals (n = 61) with chronic hepatitis C infection, genotype 1, received IFN-alfa 2b 3 mIU 3 times weekly for 24 weeks, or PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 or 3.0 microg/kg/wk, as total weekly full or split doses, for 12 weeks. At week 12, serum RNA titer was measured, and all PEG-IFN-alfa 2b patients continued with 1.5 microg/kg/wk for a further 12 weeks., Results: Mean serum hepatitis C RNA levels decreased in all groups at weeks 12 and 24. PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 microg/kg/wk was superior to IFN-alfa 2b in decreasing mean serum hepatitis C RNA ( P < .05 at week 12). The efficacy of split-dose PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 or 3.0 microg/kg/wk regimens was not significantly different from full-dose PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 microg/kg/wk. However, there was a significant decrease in neutrophil count in groups receiving PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 3.0 microg/kg/wk or lower, multiple-dose per week regimens., Conclusions: PEG-IFN-alfa 2b 1.5 microg/kg once weekly is the optimal dosing frequency for patients with chronic hepatitis C with predominantly genotype 1 infection. More frequent dosing or increasing the dose to 3.0 microg/kg/wk did not result in improved antiviral effects, but did decrease neutrophil counts.