1. Electrocardiographic approach strategies in patients with Parkinson disease treated with deep brain stimulation.
- Author
-
Sierra-Fernández CR, Garnica-Geronimo LR, Huipe-Dimas A, Ortega-Hernandez JA, Ruiz-Mafud MA, Cervantes-Arriaga A, Hernández-Medrano AJ, and Rodríguez-Violante M
- Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an interdisciplinary and reversible therapy that uses high-frequency electrical stimulation to correct aberrant neural pathways in motor and cognitive neurological disorders. However, the high frequency of the waves used in DBS can interfere with electrical recording devices (e.g., electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, cardiac monitor), creating artifacts that hinder their interpretation. The compatibility of DBS with these devices varies and depends on factors such as the underlying disease and the configuration of the neurostimulator. In emergencies where obtaining an electrocardiogram is crucial, the need for more consensus on reducing electrical artifacts in patients with DBS becomes a significant challenge. Various strategies have been proposed to attenuate the artifact generated by DBS, such as changing the DBS configuration from monopolar to bipolar, temporarily deactivating DBS during electrocardiographic recording, applying frequency filters both lower and higher than those used by DBS, and using non-standard leads. However, the inexperience of medical personnel, variability in DBS models, or the lack of a controller at the time of approach limit the application of these strategies. Current evidence on their reproducibility and efficacy is limited. Due to the growing elderly population and the rising utilization of DBS, it is imperative to create electrocardiographic methods that are easily accessible and reproducible for general physicians and emergency services., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (© 2024 Sierra-Fernández, Garnica-Geronimo, Huipe-Dimas, Ortega-Hernandez, Ruiz-Mafud, Cervantes-Arriaga, Hernández-Medrano and Rodríguez-Violante.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF