Search

To view different objects of interest, primates use fast, accurate eye movements called saccades. If saccades become inaccurate, the brain adjusts their amplitudes so they again land on target, a process known as saccade adaptation. The different types of saccades elicited in different behavioral circumstances appear to utilize different parts of the oculomotor circuitry. To gain insight into where adaptation occurs in different saccade pathways, we adapted saccades of one type and examined how that adaptation affected or transferred to saccades of a different type. If adaptation of one type of saccade causes a substantial change in the amplitude of another, that adaptation may occur at a site used in the generation of both types of saccade. Alternatively, if adaptation of one type of saccade transfers only partially, or not at all, to another, adaptation occurs at least in part at a location that is not common to the generation of both types of saccade. We produced significant amplitude reductions in memory-guided, delayed, targeting and express saccades by moving the target backward during the saccade. After memory-guided saccades were adapted, the amplitude of express, targeting and delayed saccades exhibited only a partial reduction. In contrast, when express, targeting, or delayed saccades were adapted, amplitude transfer to memory-guided saccades was more substantial. These results, combined with previously published data, suggest that there are at least two sites of adaptation within the saccadic system. One is used communally in the generation of express, targeting, delayed and memory-guided saccades, whereas the other is specific for the generation of memory-guided saccades.

When saccades become inaccurate, their amplitude is adapted. We examined, in humans, whether this adaptation occurs where the saccade is represented as a vector or as its horizontal and vertical components. In one experiment, we behaviorally reduced the amplitude of clockwise oblique saccades and examined the transfer to saccades made to other target amplitudes and directions. In a second, we adapted rightward saccades of the same size as the rightward component of the clockwise oblique saccades and examined the effect on oblique saccades. The results of both experiments imply that adaptation occurs where the saccade command is represented as a vector.

Saccadic eye movements are shifts in the direction of gaze that rapidly and accurately aim the fovea at targets of interest. Saccades are so brief that visual feedback cannot guide them to their targets. Therefore, the saccadic motor command must be accurately specified in advance of the movement and continually modified to compensate for growth, injury, and aging, which otherwise would produce dysmetric saccades. When a persistent dysmetria occurs in subjects with muscle weakness or neural damage or is induced in normal primates by the surreptitious jumping of a target forward or backward as a saccade is made to acquire the target, saccadic amplitude changes to reduce the dysmetria. Adaptation of saccadic amplitude or direction occurs gradually and is retained in the dark, thus representing true motor plasticity. Saccadic adaptation is more rapid in humans than in monkeys, usually is incomplete in both species, and is slower and less robust for amplitude increases than decreases. Adaptation appears to be motor rather than sensory. In humans, adaptation of saccades that would seem to require more sensory-motor processing does not transfer to saccades that seem to require less, suggesting the existence of distributed adaptation loci. In monkeys, however, transfer from more simple to more complex saccades is robust, suggesting a common adaptation site. Neurophysiological data from both species indicate that the oculomotor cerebellum is crucial for saccadic adaptation. This review shows that the precise, voluntary behaviors known as saccadic eye movements provide an alternative to simple reflexes for the study of the neuronal basis of motor learning.

To focus on various objects of interest within the visual environment, primates employ rapid eye movements called saccades. When the accuracy of these movements becomes impaired, the brain can adjust their amplitude by a process known as saccadic adaptation. To investigate the locus of this plasticity in the human brain, we behaviorally adapted two types of saccade thought to be generated through different neuronal pathways. Targeting saccades, which are made to sequentially illuminated targets and have long latencies, are thought to involve higher cortical processing whereas express saccades, which have very short latencies, apparently do not. If adaptation transfers between these two types of saccade, one may conclude that the plasticity must exist at a locus common to the two pathways generating these saccades. We directly reduced the gain of either targeting or express saccades by intrasaccadically moving the target one-third of its amplitude back toward the initial fixation location and then examined whether the gain was also reduced in the other type of saccade. When targeting saccades were adapted directly, all subjects showed significant reductions in the gain of these saccades. In 75% of the 32 experimental target conditions across all subjects, there were also significant reductions in the gain of express saccades, thus providing evidence of adaptation transfer. In 71% of these conditions (i.e., 53% of all target conditions) there was no significant difference between the reductions in gain of the two types of saccade, suggesting that adaptation transfer was complete (100%). Similar results were obtained when express saccades were adapted directly: significant reductions in gain occurred in 91% of express saccades and in 100% of targeting saccades. In 86% of the target conditions, across subjects, in which both express and targeting saccades showed significant reductions in gain, the two types of saccade did not differ significantly in the amount of gain reduction. This suggests that adaptation transfer was complete for 78% of all target conditions. Therefore, we conclude that saccadic adaptation transfers robustly between targeting and express saccades. These results suggest that adaptation in humans occurs after the pathways generating these two types of saccade converge, probably at or downstream from the superior colliculus.

Rattling by rattlesnakes is one of the fastest vertebrate movements and involves some of the highest contraction frequencies sustained by vertebrate muscle. Rattling requires higher accelerations at higher twitch frequencies, yet a previous study showed that the cost per twitch of rattling is independent of twitch frequency. We used force and video recordings over a range of temperatures to examine how western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox) achieve faster movements without increases in metabolic cost. The key findings are (i) that increasing muscle twitch tension trades off with decreasing twitch duration to keep the tension-time integral per twitch nearly constant over a wide range of temperatures and twitch frequencies and (ii) that decreasing lateral displacement of the rattle joint moderates the mechanical work and power required to shake the rattle at higher frequencies. These mechanical trade-offs between twitch tension and duration and between joint force and displacement explain how force, work and power increase without an increase in metabolic cost.