Search

Introduction: Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent among individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, little is understood about how social determinants of health (SDOH) may impact mental health diagnoses in this population. The social vulnerability index (SVI) is a publicly available tool that can be used to study SDOH in IBD patients., Methods: Home addresses from a retrospective cohort of IBD patients at a single center were used to geocode patients to their individual census tract and corresponding SVI. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between SVI and comorbid mental health diagnoses in patients with IBD. Secondarily, data from standardized health questionnaires were then used to determine if patients were adequately screened for depression and anxiety., Results: In all, 9644 patients were included; 18% had a diagnosis of depression, 21% anxiety, and 32% had a composite of "any mental health diagnosis." Depression (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.56) but not anxiety (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06) nor "any mental health diagnosis" (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.92-1.30) was associated with higher levels of social vulnerability. However, overall rates of screening for depression and anxiety were low (15% and 8%, respectively), with the lowest screening rates among the most socially vulnerable (depression 8.2%, anxiety 6.3%)., Conclusions: Disparities in the diagnoses of depression and anxiety for socially vulnerable patients with IBD exist. Awareness of these inequities is the first step toward developing interventions to improve mental health screening, eliminate barriers and bias, and promote referrals for appropriate mental health management., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Insurer-mandated barriers to timely initiation of advanced therapies used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been shown to worsen clinical outcomes and increase healthcare utilization, yet rarely alter the medication ultimately prescribed., Methods: We conducted a survey within the IBD Partners longitudinal cohort to evaluate the frequency and patient-reported impacts of medication utilization barriers on insurance satisfaction and clinical outcomes. Barriers included medication denials, prior authorizations, and forced medication switches. Variables associated with insurance satisfaction, measured on a 1-7 Likert scale, were identified. The association between insurance-related barriers and downstream clinical outcomes (surgery, corticosteroid requirement, and disease activity) were evaluated., Results: Two thousand seventeen patients (age 45 [interquartile range 34-58] years, 73% female) were included. Seventy-two percent experienced an insurer-mandated barrier, most commonly prior authorizations (51%). Fifteen percent were denied an IBD medication by their insurer, 22% experienced an insurance-related gap in therapy, and 8% were forced by their insurer to switch from an effective medication. Insurance satisfaction was negatively associated with medication denials, prior authorization-related delays, gaps in therapy, and high-deductible health plan coverage. In the year following the initial survey, several insurance barriers were linked to negative downstream clinical outcomes, including prior authorizations associated with corticosteroid rescue (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-4.00), forced medication switches associated with continued disease activity (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.56-6.89), and medication denials associated with IBD-related surgery (OR 8.92, 95% CI 1.97-40.39)., Discussion: These data illustrate the frequency and negative impacts of insurer-mandated medication barriers on patients with IBD, including decreased insurance satisfaction and negative downstream clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: Cannabis may provide inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with an alternative to opioids for pain., Methods: We conducted a difference-in-difference analysis using MarketScan. Changes over time in rates of opioid prescribing were compared in states with legalized cannabis to those without., Results: We identified 6,240 patients with IBD in states with legalized cannabis and 79,272 patients with IBD in states without legalized cannabis. The rate of opioid prescribing decreased over time in both groups and were not significantly different (attributed differential = 0.34, confidence interval -13.02 to 13.70, P = 0.96)., Discussion: Opioid prescribing decreased from 2009 to 2016 among patients with IBD in both states with legalized and state without legalized cannabis, similar to what has been observed nationally across a variety of diseases. Cannabis legalization was not associated with a lower rate of opioid prescribing for patients with IBD., (Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-treating presentation of ulcerative colitis (UC) that requires prompt initiation of treatment to avoid complication. Unfortunately, outcomes for ASUC are suboptimal, with as many as 20-30% of patients requiring colectomy. This can be challenging for patients and highlights the need to understand patient experiences and perspectives navigating ASUC., Methods: A qualitative descriptive study utilizing semi-structured interviews was conducted to understand perspectives and experiences of patients navigating ASUC. Adult patients hospitalized for ASUC between January 2017 and March 2024 were eligible. Interviews were conducted both retrospectively among patients with a recent hospitalization and prospectively among patients within 24 h of hospitalization for ASUC. Interviews were analyzed using a well-established hybrid inductive-deductive approach., Results: Thirty-four patients (44.2% response rate) hospitalized for ASUC were interviewed. Hybrid thematic analysis uncovered five major themes: (1) the pervasive impact of UC on QoL and mental health, (2) challenges associated with navigating uncertainty, (3) prioritizing colon preservation, (4) bridging the divide between outpatient expectations and inpatient realities, and (5) balancing rapid symptom improvement with steroid safety. Our findings advocate for transparent approach to care, emphasizing the need for effective communication, education, and better alignment with patient values and expectations., Conclusion: Five key themes were identified, each with significant implications for developing a more patient-centered approach to ASUC care. These themes captured meaningful insight into patient perceptions and experiences, identifying multiple areas for actionable interventions to improve care., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Even in the absence of inflammation, persistent symptoms in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are prevalent and worsen quality of life. We previously demonstrated enrichment in sulfidogenic microbes in quiescent Crohn's disease patients with ( qCD+S ) vs. without persistent GI symptoms ( qCD-S ). Thus, we hypothesized that sulfur metabolic pathways would be enriched in stool while differentially abundant microbes would be associated with important sulfur-metabolic pathways in qCD+S., Methods: We performed a multi-center observational study nested within SPARC IBD. Quiescent inflammation was defined by fecal calprotectin level <150 mcg/g. Persistent symptoms were defined by CD-PRO2. Active CD ( aCD ) and non-IBD diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome ( IBS-D ) were included as controls., Results: Thirty-nine patients with qCD+S, 274 qCD-S, 21 aCD, and 40 IBS-D underwent paired shotgun metagenomic sequencing and untargeted metabolomic profiling. The fecal metabolome in qCD+S was significantly different relative to qCD-S and IBS-D but not aCD. Patients with qCD+S were enriched in sulfur-containing amino acid pathways, including cysteine and methionine, as well as serine, glycine, and threonine. Glutathione and nicotinate/nicotinamide pathways were also enriched in qCD+S relative to qCD-S, suggestive of mitochondrial dysfunction, a downstream target of H 2 S signaling. Multi-omic integration demonstrated that enriched microbes in qCD+S were associated with important sulfur-metabolic pathways. Bacterial sulfur-metabolic genes, including CTH , isfD , sarD , and asrC , were dysregulated in qCD+S. Finally, sulfur metabolites with and without sulfidogenic microbes showed good accuracy in predicting presence of qCD+S., Discussion: Microbial-derived sulfur pathways and downstream mitochondrial function are perturbed in qCD+S, which implicate H 2 S signaling in the pathogenesis of this condition. Future studies will determine whether targeting H 2 S pathways results in improved quality of life in qCD+S., Key Messages: What is Already Known Even in the absence of inflammation, persistent gastrointestinal symptoms are common in Crohn's disease.The microbiome is altered in quiescent Crohn's disease patients with persistent symptoms, but the functional significance of these changes is unknown. What is New Here Sulfur metabolites and sulfur metabolic pathways were enriched in stool in quiescent Crohn's disease patients with persistent symptoms.Multi-omic integration showed enriched microbes were associated with important sulfur metabolic pathways in quiescent Crohn's disease patients with persistent symptoms. How Can This Study Help Patient Care Strategies to decrease sulfidogenic microbes and associated sulfur metabolic pathways could represent a novel strategy to improve quality of life in quiescent Crohn's disease with persistent GI symptoms.

Objectives: Integration of social determinants of health into health outcomes research will allow researchers to study health inequities. The All of Us Research Program has the potential to be a rich source of social determinants of health data. However, user-friendly recommendations for scoring and interpreting the All of Us Social Determinants of Health Survey are needed to return value to communities through advancing researcher competencies in use of the All of Us Research Hub Researcher Workbench. We created a user guide aimed at providing researchers with an overview of the Social Determinants of Health Survey, recommendations for scoring and interpreting participant responses, and readily executable R and Python functions., Target Audience: This user guide targets registered users of the All of Us Research Hub Researcher Workbench, a cloud-based platform that supports analysis of All of Us data, who are currently conducting or planning to conduct analyses using the Social Determinants of Health Survey., Scope: We introduce 14 constructs evaluated as part of the Social Determinants of Health Survey and summarize construct operationalization. We offer 30 literature-informed recommendations for scoring participant responses and interpreting scores, with multiple options available for 8 of the constructs. Then, we walk through example R and Python functions for relabeling responses and scoring constructs that can be directly implemented in Jupyter Notebook or RStudio within the Researcher Workbench. Full source code is available in supplemental files and GitHub. Finally, we discuss psychometric considerations related to the Social Determinants of Health Survey for researchers., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.)

Background and Aims: COVID-19 vaccination prevents severe disease in most patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but immunosuppressive medications can blunt serologic response. We followed adults with IBD for >1 year post-COVID-19 vaccination to describe factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination, evaluate for a protective SARS-CoV-2 antibody level, characterize SARS-CoV-2 antibody persistence, and identify factors associated with humoral immune response durability., Methods: Using a prospective cohort of COVID-19 immunized adults with IBD, we analyzed factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccination. We evaluated for an association between SARS-CoV-2 antibody level 12 weeks postvaccination and subsequent SARS-CoV-2 infection and assessed for a threshold of protection using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. We then conducted a separate analysis evaluating factors associated with persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies 52 weeks postimmunization., Results: Almost half (43%) of 1869 participants developed COVID-19 after vaccination, but most infections were mild, and <1% required hospitalization. Older age and corticosteroid use were associated with a decreased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection postvaccination (50-59 years of age vs 18-29 years of age: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.74; steroid users vs nonusers: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.87). Most (98%) participants had detectable antibody levels at 52 weeks postvaccination. Antibody levels at 12 weeks and number of vaccine doses were positively associated with higher antibody levels at 52 weeks, while anti-tumor necrosis factor α therapy was negatively associated., Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccination generates an effective and durable protective response for the vast majority of adults with IBD, including vulnerable populations such as corticosteroid users and older individuals. Patients with IBD benefit from COVID-19 booster vaccination., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We recently showed that CAPTURE-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-a care coordination intervention comprised of routine remote monitoring of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and a care coordinator-triggered care pathway-was more effective at reducing symptom burden for patients with IBD compared to usual care. We aimed to understand how patients and care team providers experienced the intervention and evaluate purported mechanisms of action to plan for future implementation., Methods: In this study, 205 patients were randomized to CAPTURE-IBD (n = 100) or usual care(n = 105). We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 of the 100 participants in the CAPTURE-IBD arm and 5 care team providers to achieve thematic saturation. We used qualitative rapid analysis to generate a broad understanding of experiences, perceived impact, the coordinator role, and suggested improvements., Results: Findings highlight that the intervention was acceptable and user-friendly, despite concerns regarding increased nursing workload. Both participants and care team providers perceived the intervention as valuable in supporting symptom monitoring, psychosocial care, and between-visit action plans to improve IBD care and health outcomes. However, few participants leveraged the care coordinator as intended. Finally, participants reported that the intervention could be better tailored to capture day-to-day symptom changes and to meet the needs of patients with specific comorbid conditions (eg, ostomies)., Conclusions: Remote PRO monitoring is acceptable and may be valuable in improving care management, promoting tight control, and supporting whole health in IBD. Future efforts should focus on testing and implementing refined versions of CAPTURE-IBD tailored to different clinical settings., Competing Interests: None., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

Children with very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) may respond differently to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunization compared to healthy children or other patients with IBD. We recruited children with VEO-IBD <6 years of age and younger following receipt of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. Demographics, IBD characteristics, medication use, adverse events (AEs) and IBD exacerbations were collected. Blood draws (optional) were obtained for measurement of antireceptor binding domain (RBD) IgG antibodies following vaccination. Of 41 participants, none required emergency department visit or hospitalization due to AE, and only one experienced IBD exacerbation. Detectable antibody was present in 19/19 participants who provided blood sample; 6/7 participants (86%) had durable humoral response 12 months postvaccination. Children with VEO-IBD experience robust humoral immune response to COVID-19 immunization. Severe AEs were rare. These findings provide reassurance that children with VEO-IBD respond well and safely to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Introduction: A significant proportion of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) require colectomy., Methods: Patients with ASUC treated with upadacitinib and intravenous corticosteroids at 5 hospitals are presented. The primary outcome was 90-day colectomy rate. Secondary outcomes included frequency of steroid-free clinical remission, adverse events, and all-cause readmissions., Results: Of the 25 patients with ASUC treated with upadacitinib, 6 (24%) patients underwent colectomy, 15 (83%) of the 18 patients with available data and who did not undergo colectomy experienced steroid-free clinical remission (1 patient did not have complete data), 1 (4%) patient experienced a venous thromboembolic event, while 5 (20%) patients were readmitted., Discussion: Upadacitinib along with intravenous corticosteroids may be an effective treatment for ASUC., (Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: There is a paucity of data on the real-world effectiveness of therapies in patients with Crohn's disease of the pouch., Methods: This was a prospective multicenter study evaluating the primary outcome of remission at 12 months of therapy for Crohn's disease of the pouch., Results: One hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled. Among the 77 patients with symptoms at baseline, 35 (46.7%) achieved remission at 12 months. Of them, 12 (34.3%) changed therapy. There was no significant association between therapy patterns and remission status., Discussion: Approximately 50% with symptoms at enrollment achieved clinical remission at 12 months, most of whom did so without a change in therapy., (Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Upadacitinib is an oral, selective Janus kinase inhibitor., Aim: To assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis following 16-week extended induction therapy, and 52-week maintenance therapy in patients achieving clinical response after 16-week extended induction therapy METHODS: Patients without clinical response to 8 weeks' upadacitinib 45 mg once daily induction therapy in two induction trials were eligible for an additional 8 weeks of therapy. Patients achieving clinical response at Week 16 were subsequently re-randomised (1:1) to upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg once daily for 52-week maintenance therapy. Efficacy was assessed at induction Week 16 (integrated) and maintenance Week 52; safety was assessed throughout., Results: Overall, 127/663 (19.2%) patients did not achieve clinical response to upadacitinib 45 mg at Week 8 and received an additional 8 weeks of therapy; 75/127 (59.1%) subsequently achieved clinical response at Week 16 and entered the maintenance trial. At Week 52, 26.5% of patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg, and 43.6% receiving 30 mg, achieved clinical remission; efficacy was observed across all other endpoints with both doses. Herpes zoster rates increased with longer duration (16 weeks) of exposure to upadacitinib 45 mg during induction compared with the same population during the first 8 weeks. No other new safety signals were observed, and results are otherwise consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib., Conclusions: Patients without clinical response after 8 weeks' upadacitinib 45 mg induction therapy, may benefit from an additional 8 weeks of therapy., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02819635; NCT03653026., (© 2023 Abbvie. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Efficacy and safety of mirikizumab, a p19-targeted anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis was demonstrated previously. We evaluated clinical response, baseline characteristics, and clinical status in patients not responding by 12 weeks (W) of induction who then received extended induction treatment., Method: Patients unresponsive to 300 mg of intravenous (IV) mirikizumab every 4 weeks by W12 received 3 additional 300 mg IV doses every 4 weeks. Week-4 responders received 200 mg mirikizumab every 4 weeks subcutaneously until W52. Patients responding by W12 but subsequently losing response received rescue therapy with 300 mg IV for 3 doses every 4 weeks. Logistic regression modelling was performed for patients not achieving W12 clinical response to assess baseline characteristics and W12 efficacy parameters and potential prognostic factors of clinical response at W24., Results: Of patients not achieving clinical response during induction, 53.7% achieved response following extended induction. After 52W, 72.2%, 43.1%, and 36.1% of patients achieved clinical response, endoscopic, and clinical remission, respectively. Of induction responders who subsequently lost response, 63.2% and 36.8% achieved symptomatic response and remission, respectively, after receiving rescue therapy No prior biologic or tofacitinib treatment, no immunomodulators at baseline, age older than 40 years, and W12 modified Mayo Score improvement were positively associated with a response to extended induction. The safety profile was similar to initial induction, with 38.3% treatment emergent adverse events, mostly mild., Conclusion: With "extended induction," total of 80.3% mirikizumab-treated patients achieved clinical response by W24. Potential prognostic factors determining response include disease severity, disease phenotype, C-reactive protein, and previous biologic therapy., (© 2024 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.)

Background: Improvement in bowel urgency (BU) was associated with better clinical outcomes in phase 3 LUCENT-1 (induction) and LUCENT-2 (maintenance) studies in moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed association of BU with quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes., Methods: LUCENT-1: 1162 patients randomized 3:1 to intravenous mirikizumab 300 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 12 weeks. LUCENT-2: 544 mirikizumab induction responders re-randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous mirikizumab 200 mg or placebo Q4W through Week (W) 40 (W52 of continuous treatment). Patients reported BU severity in the past 24 hours using a validated Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). In patients with baseline Urgency NRS ≥3, the association between BU Clinically Meaningful Improvement (CMI; ≥3-point decrease) and remission (score 0 or 1) with patient-reported outcomes was assessed at W12 and W52., Results: A significantly greater proportion of patients with versus without BU Remission achieved IBDQ remission (W12: 87.3% vs 42.7%, P  < .0001; W52: 91.4% vs 45.5%, p < .0001). Similarly, BU Remission was associated with more patients achieving CMI in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (W12: 69.0% vs 44.4%, P  < .0001; W52: 77.5% vs 42.1%, P  < .0001) and Mental Component Summary (W12: 53.5% vs 41.0%, P  = .0019; W52: 62.0% vs 38.3%, P  < .0001) scores. At W12 and W52, patients with BU CMI or Remission showed significant improvements in EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment:UC scores. Significant improvements were also seen in fatigue, abdominal pain, and nocturnal stool., Conclusions: In patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, improvement in BU was associated with improved QoL in phase 3 LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2 studies., Clinical Studies: LUCENT-1: NCT03518086; LUCENT-2: NCT03524092., Competing Interests: MDL: Consulting: AbbVie, Takeda, Pfizer, Janssen, BMS, Lilly, Prometheus, Target RWE; research support: Pfizer, Lilly, Takeda. SS: Consultancy and personal fees: AbbVie, Arena, BMS, Biogen, Celltrion, Celgene, Falk, Fresenius, Gilead, HIKMA, IMAB, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Pfizer, Protagonist, Provention Bio, Takeda, and Theravance. TH: Lecture fees: AbbVie GK, EA Pharma, Janssen, JIMRO, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Sand K.K. Takeda Pharmaceutical, Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; advisory/consultancy fees: AbbVie GK, Celltrion, EA Pharma, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Zeria Pharmaceutical; research grants: AbbVie GK, Activaid, Alfresa Pharma Corporation, JMDC Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb; received scholarship contributions: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; belonged to study group sponsorship by Alfresa Pharma Corporation, JIMRO Co., Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. THG: Employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. DAF: Employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. GP: Former contracted worker of Eli Lilly and Company. Work related to the study was performed during her tenure at Eli Lilly and Company. REM: Employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. PH: Consulting and/or speaker fees: AbbVie, Buhlmann Laboratories, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Takeda. JOL: Consulting and/or speaker fees: AbbVie, Allergan (Warner Chilcott), Atlantic Healthcare, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Napp, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, and Vifor Pharma; investigator-led research grants: AbbVie, Gilead, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda. SDL: Consulting fees: AbbVie, Janssen, BMS, Lilly. RE: Employee and stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. VJ: Consulting/advisory board fees: AbbVie, Alimentiv Inc, Arena pharmaceuticals, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Avoro Capital, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Endpoint Health, Ferring, Flagship Pioneering, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilde Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Metacrine, Mylan, Pandion, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Protagonist, Prometheus, Reistone Biopharma, Roche, Sandoz, Second Genome, Sorriso Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Teva, Topivert, Ventyx, Vividion; speaker’s fees: AbbVie, Ferring, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, Fresenius Kabi., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

Background: Web-based portals can enhance communication between patients and providers to support IBD self-management and improve care. We aimed to identify portal use patterns of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to inform future web portal-based interventions and portal design., Methods: Patients with IBD receiving care at the University of Michigan between 2012 and 2021 were identified. Meta-data from electronic logs of each patient's most recent year of portal use were abstracted. Portal engagement was characterized in terms of intensity (ie, frequency of use); comprehensiveness (ie, number of portal functions used); and duration (ie, quarters per year of portal use). We used k-means clustering, a machine-learning technique, to identify groupings of portal users defined in terms of engagement features., Results: We found 5605 patients with IBD who had accessed their portal account at least once. The average age was 41.2 years (SD 16.7), 3035 (54.2%) were female, and 2214 (39.5%) received immune-targeted therapies. We identified 3 patterns of portal engagement: (1) low intensity users (29.5%); (2) moderate intensity, comprehensive, and sustained users (63.3%); and (3) high intensity, comprehensive, sustained users (7.2%). Patients with more intense, comprehensive, and sustained use of the portal were older, female, with more comorbidities, and were more likely to receive immune-targeted therapies., Conclusion: Understanding distinct patterns of portal use can inform portal-based interventions and portal design. Patient portals may be particularly helpful in delivering assistance to those with comorbidities and those receiving immune-targeted therapies-many of whom demonstrate more intense, comprehensive, and sustained portal use., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Fecal calprotectin (FCP) is used to monitor inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity and can also be elevated in gastrointestinal infections. Our study's objective was to quantify the relationship between FCP levels and lab-confirmed infections in people with and without IBD. We performed a cross-sectional study at a tertiary-care center of all encounters during which FCP and gastrointestinal pathogen polymerase-chain reaction (GI PCR) panel testings were conducted. Using non-parametric tests and quantile regression, we compared the FCP levels by IBD status and pathogen detection. There were 3,347 encounters with FCP and GI PCR testings from 2,780 unique individuals between 1 August 2016 and 17 February 2022. Overall, 54.4% had IBD ( n = 1,819). Pathogens were detected in 744 encounters (22.2%), and the detection rate did not differ by IBD status. Median FCP without IBD was significantly elevated when a pathogen was detected (64 vs 41 mg/kg, P = 0.0003, normal ≤50.0 mg/kg), but FCP with IBD was not significantly elevated when a pathogen was detected (299 vs 255 mg/kg, P = 0.207). In quantile regression adjusted for age and IBD, pathogen detection was only significantly associated with higher FCP in the lower two quartiles, though IBD remained significantly associated with higher FCP at all levels ( P > 0.001). Pathogen detection by GI PCR is associated with elevated FCP, though this relationship is nonlinear and varies by IBD status. Our findings indicate that FCP may be an adjunct to, but not a substitute for, stool pathogen testing., Competing Interests: Peter D.R. Higgins has served as a consultant for Abbvie, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. Kira L. Newman has no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.

Background and Aims: Even in the absence of inflammation, persistent symptoms in Crohn's disease (CD) are prevalent and worsen quality of life. Amongst patients without inflammation (quiescent CD), we hypothesized that microbial community structure and function, including tryptophan metabolism, would differ between patients with persistent symptoms ( qCD + S ) and without persistent symptoms ( qCD-S )., Methods: We performed a multicenter observational study nested within the Study of a Prospective Adult Research Cohort with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Quiescent inflammation was defined by fecal calprotectin level <150 mcg/g. Persistent symptoms were defined by Crohn's Disease Patient-Reported Outcome-2. Active CD, diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, and healthy controls were included as controls. Stool samples underwent whole-genome shotgun metagenomic sequencing., Results: Thirty-nine patients with qCD + S, 274 qCD-S, 21 active CD, 40 diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, and 50 healthy controls were included for analysis. Patients with qCD + S had a less-diverse microbiome. Furthermore, patients with qCD + S showed significant enrichment of bacterial species that are normal inhabitants of the oral microbiome (eg Rothia dentocariosa, Fusobacterium nucleatum ) and sulfidogenic microbes (eg Prevotella copri , Bilophila spp.). Depletion of important butyrate and indole producers (eg Eubacterium rectale, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii ) was also noted in qCD + S. Potential metagenome-related functional changes in cysteine and methionine metabolism, ATP transport, and redox reactions were disturbed in qCD + S, also suggestive of altered sulfur metabolism. Finally, qCD + S showed significant reductions in bacterial tnaA genes, which mediate tryptophan metabolism to indole, and significant tnaA allelic variation compared with qCD-S., Conclusion: The microbiome in qCD + S showed significant differences in sulfidogenesis, butyrate producers, and typically oral microbes compared to qCD-S and active CD. These results suggest that inflammation may lead to durable microbiome alterations which may mediate persistent symptoms through testable mechanisms., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Upadacitinib is an oral, selective, and reversible JAK inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in a phase 2b induction trial, two phase 3 induction trials (U-ACHIEVE Induction and U-ACCOMPLISH), and a primary analysis of the first 451 patients entering a subsequent maintenance trial (U-ACHIEVE Maintenance). Here, we present overall results from the entire U-ACHIEVE Maintenance population., Methods: In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 maintenance study done across Europe, North and South America, Australasia, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region at 251 clinical centres in 44 countries, patients aged 16-75 years with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (adapted Mayo score 5-9, centrally assessed endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3) for 90 days or more were randomly assigned (2:1) to double-blind upadacitinib 45 mg once daily or placebo induction therapy in the phase 2b induction trial or two phase 3 induction trials. Patients with a clinical response per adapted Mayo score after 8 weeks were randomly reassigned (1:1:1) using web-based interactive response technology to 52 week double-blind maintenance therapy with placebo, upadacitinib 15 mg, or upadacitinib 30 mg once daily. Efficacy was analysed at week 52 in the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients randomly reassigned who received at least one dose of study drug. The primary endpoint was clinical remission per adapted Mayo score. Safety through week 52 was assessed with exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs; events per 100 patient-years) in upadacitinib 45 mg once daily 8-week induction responders who were enrolled per protocol for 44-week or 52-week maintenance therapy (ie, the intention-to-treat population plus patients who received up to 44 weeks' maintenance therapy under earlier protocol amendments) and received at least one dose of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02819635 and is complete., Findings: Between Sept 3, 2016, and Jan 14, 2021 987 patients received the upadacitinib 45 mg once daily induction therapy in the phase 2b trial, U-ACHIEVE Induction, or U-ACCOMPLISH. 681 patients with a clinical response to the induction therapy (319 from U-ACHIEVE Induction, 341 from U-ACCOMPLISH, and 21 from the phase 2b induction trial) received placebo (n=223), upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (n=225), or upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (n=233) in U-ACHIEVE Maintenance and were included in this analysis. A greater proportion of patients achieved the primary endpoint with upadacitinib 15 mg (40·4%) and 30 mg once daily (53·6%) versus placebo (10·8%; both p<0·0001 vs placebo). For safety, 746 patients were analysed, representing 552·9 patient-years of exposure; the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were worsening of ulcerative colitis in nine (4%) patients with placebo, and COVID-19 pneumonia and cryptococcal pneumonia in two (1%) patients each with upadacitinib 30 mg once daily. Higher EAERs of the following treatment-emergent events of special interest were observed with upadacitinib versus placebo: herpes zoster (6·0 events per 100 patient-years with upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and 7·3 events per 100 patient-years with upadacitinib 30 mg once daily vs none per 100 patient-years with placebo [12 and 16 vs no events, respectively), hepatic disorders (17·0 and 9·2 vs 5·9 events per 100 patient-years [34 and 20 vs eight events, respectively), creatine phosphokinase elevation (8·0 and 10·1 vs 3·7 events per 100 patient-years [16 and 22 vs five events], respectively), and neutropenia (5·5 and 8·7 vs 5·2 events per 100 patient-years [11 and 19 vs seven events], respectively). One (<1% of patients) adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event occurred with placebo and one (<1% of patients) with upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (EAERs 0·7 and 0·5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively). Two (1% of patients) venous thromboembolic events occurred with upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and two (1% of patients) with upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (EAERs 1·0 and 0·9 events per 100 patient-years, respectively). All adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolic events with upadacitinib occurred in patients with relevant known risk factors., Interpretation: Consistent with the primary analysis done among a smaller population, both maintenance doses of upadacitinib showed a positive benefit-risk profile in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Upadacitinib represents an effective treatment option for this population, for whom a large unmet need persists., Funding: AbbVie., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SV has received grants from AbbVie, Galapagos, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Takeda; and consulting or speaking fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts Clinical Trials), Arena Pharmaceuticals, Avaxia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech-Roche, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Prodigest, Progenity, Prometheus, Second Genome, Shire, Takeda, Theravance, and Tillotts Pharma. SD has received consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, TiGenix, UCB, and Vifor. WZ is a former employee of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock or stock options. DI, JK, GL, XY, SC, and YSG are full-time employees of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock or stock options. XH reports clinical research funding from AbbVie, Abivax, Alphasigma, Arena, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Enterome, Fresenius-Kabi, Janssen, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Sangamo, Takeda, and Theravance; serving on advisory boards for AbbVie, Abivax, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Fresenius-Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, Nestlé Health Sciences, Nordic Pharma, and Viatris; and participating in lectures and educational activities for AbbVie, Amgen, Celltrion, Fresenius-Kabi, Janssen, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Nestlé Health Sciences, Nutricia, Pfizer, Tillotts, Takeda, and Viatris. JOL has served as a consultant and an advisory board participant for AbbVie, Allergan (Warner Chilcott), Atlantic Healthcare, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Napp, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, and Vifor Pharma; has received speaker fees and sponsorship for academic meetings from AbbVie, Allergan (Warner Chilcott), Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, MSD, Napp, Norgine, Pfizer, Shire, Tillotts Pharma, and Takeda; and has received investigator-led research grants from AbbVie, Gilead, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda. PDRH has received grants from AbbVie, the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and Takeda; and has served as a consultant for Eli Lilly, the Gastrointestinal Health Foundation, Imedex, Pfizer, Takeda, and Vindico Medical Education. QC declares no competing interests. HN has received support from AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Daiichi Sankyo, EA Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical, JIMRO, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical; as well as grants for commissioned or joint research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Hoya Group Pentax Medical. J-FC has received personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Enterome, Ferring, Genentech, Janssen–Johnson & Johnson, MedImmune, Merck, Pfizer, Protagonist, PPM Services, Second Genome, Seres, Shire, Takeda, and Theradiag; has received grant support from AbbVie, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda; and holds stock options in Genfit and Intestinal Biotech Development. EVL has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Alvotech, Amgen, Arena, Avalo Therapeutics, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Calibr, Celgene, Celltrion Healthcare, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Iota Biosciences, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, KLS Diagnostics, Morphic Therapeutics, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Protagonist, Scipher Medicine, Sun Pharma, Surrozen, Takeda, and UCB; has served as an advisory board participant for Eli Lilly and Morphic; has received research support from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene/Receptos, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Theravance, and UCB; and holds stock in Exact Sciences. RP has received consulting fees, speaker fees, and research support from Abbott, AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts Clinical Trials), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Élan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Oppilan Pharma, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Schering-Plough, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, Theravance, and UCB., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for many co-morbid diseases. However, little is known about durability of IBD medications in patients with co-morbid diseases., Aims: Determine medication durability in IBD patients with and without psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and/or enteropathic arthropathy., Methods: All patients with at least three ICD-9 or 10 diagnoses for IBD were included in the cohort. The risk factors of interest were a co-morbid diagnosis of psoriasis (IBD-Ps), rheumatoid arthritis (IBD-RA), and/or enteropathic arthritis (IBD-EA). Medication durability was defined as days of medication use, calculated using order start and stop dates from the electronic medical record. Significant differences were tested using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test or Pearson's Chi-squared test, as appropriate, for categorical variables. Boxplots were constructed for graphical interpretation of results., Results: In the psoriasis group, there were 481 patients with 831 medication exposures [131 IBS-Ps (16%), 700 IBD only (84%)]. The median days of medication use were numerically higher in the IBD-Ps group for all therapies [anti-TNF: 1109 vs 861 (p = 0.17); anti-IL-12/23: 984 vs 834 (p = 0.33); JAKi: 682 vs 230 (p = 0.13)], anti-TNF/IM: 370 vs 202 (p = 0.57), except anti-integrin therapy [214 vs 470 (p = 0.08)]. When restricting to UC only, patients with co-morbid again Ps had a significantly shorter duration on anti-integrin therapy (84 vs 456 days, p = 0.02). While not reaching statistical significance, there was a distinctly longer medication duration on JAKi therapy (910 vs 317, p = 0.10). When restricting to patients with CD only, no results reached statistical significance though there was a trend towards longer anti-TNF durability in CD-Ps (1340 vs 1000 days, p = 0.098). There were no differences in medication durability in IBD-RA or IBD-EA patients., Discussion: Larger studies investigating medication durability of JAKi and anti-integrin therapy in IBD patients with psoriasis would be beneficial given noteworthy trends towards increased and decreased durability, respectively., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: We evaluated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) benefits of upadacitinib (UPA) induction and maintenance treatment in a phase 3 study of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) across a broad range of patient-centered outcomes., Methods: Patients received UPA 45 mg once daily or placebo as induction treatment for 8 weeks. Patients who achieved clinical response were rerandomized to receive once daily UPA 15 mg, 30 mg, or placebo as maintenance treatment for 52 weeks. The percentages of patients reporting a clinically meaningful within-person change from baseline in the Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms Questionnaire, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire, 36-Item Short Form Survey, and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 5 Levels were evaluated at weeks 2 and 8 of induction and at weeks 0 and 52 of maintenance., Results: Significant improvements from baseline in all HRQoL measures except the Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire-absenteeism were achieved with UPA (P < .001) vs placebo as early as week 2 of induction. These improvements were sustained at week 52 with significantly more patients treated with either 15 mg or 30 mg UPA vs placebo achieving meaningful within-person change in the Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms Questionnaire; Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; overall work impairment, presenteeism, and activity impairment; both 36-Item Short Form Survey Physical and Mental Component Summaries; and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 5 Levels (P < .001)., Conclusions: Induction treatment with UPA 45 mg significantly improved HRQoL measures. A significantly higher percentage of patients who responded to induction treatment with UPA maintained clinically meaningful improvements consistently across a wide range of HRQoL outcomes after 52 weeks of maintenance therapy with UPA (15 mg and 30 mg) compared with placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Numbers: NCT02819635, NCT03653026)., (© 2023 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation.)

Introduction: To examine which facility characteristics, including teamwork, are associated with early or rapid inflammatory bowel disease-related ustekinumab adoption., Methods: We examined the association between ustekinumab adoption and the characteristics of 130 Veterans Affairs facilities., Results: Mean ustekinumab adoption increased by 3.9% from 2016 to 2018 and was higher in urban compared with rural facilities (β = 0.03, P = 0.033) and among facilities with more teamwork (β = 0.11, P = 0.041). Compared with nonearly adopters, early adopters were more likely be high-volume facilities (46% vs 19%, P = 0.001)., Discussion: Facility variation in medication adoption provides an opportunity for improving inflammatory bowel disease care through targeted dissemination strategies to improve medication uptake., (Copyright © 2023 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Evidence-based recommendations regarding the influence of diet on inflammatory conditions of the pouch after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are limited., Methods: We analyzed dietary patterns at enrollment in a prospective registry of patients with 1 of 4 inflammatory conditions of the pouch (acute pouchitis, chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis, chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis, and Crohn's disease of the pouch). We analyzed dietary intake by disease activity at enrollment and then compared dietary patterns among patients who remained in remission throughout the 12-month follow-up to those patients who experienced a disease relapse. We also compared dietary patterns among patients with inflammatory conditions of the pouch to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) recommended daily goals., Results: Among 308 patients, there were no differences in dietary patterns among patients with 1 of the 4 disease states at enrollment. Additionally, among the 102 patients in remission at baseline, there were no significant differences noted among patients who went on to experience a disease flare in the 12 months after enrollment compared to those patients who remained in remission. However, patients with inflammatory conditions of the pouch demonstrated decreased intake of several food groups and macronutrients including dairy, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and fiber when compared to USDA recommendations., Conclusions: In a prospective cohort, we demonstrated no impact of dietary patterns on disease activity. The relative deficiencies in several food groups and macronutrients among patients after IPAA indicate the potential role of targeted nutritional counseling in this population., Competing Interests: E.L.B. has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli Lilly, and Target RWE. P.D. has served as a consultant or on an advisory board for Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals LLC, Roche Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb and Scipher Medicine Corporation. He has also received funding under a sponsored research agreement unrelated to the data in the paper from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Landos Pharma, Teva Pharma, Iterative scopes, CorEvitas and Boehringer Ingelheim. P.D. holds the position of Associate Editor for Crohn’s & Colitis 360 and has been recused from reviewing or making decisions for the manuscript. P.B.-P. has received honorarium from the Takeda speaker’s bureau. L.R. has served on an advisory board for Janssen. LR holds the position of Associate Editor for Crohn’s & Colitis 360 and has been recused from reviewing or making decisions for the manuscript. M.D. has served as a consultant or has received advisory board fees from Abbvie, Arena, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Prometheus Labs, Takeda. She has received grant support from Janssen, Abbvie. She also has the following relationships: Licenser of software: Takeda; Co-Founder, Equity ownership and board of director for Trellus Health Shannon Chang has served as a consultant for AbbVie, BMS, and Pfizer. R.K.C. has participated in advisory boards for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fresenius Kabi, and has served as a consultant for Fzata, Magellan Health, Pfizer, and Samsung Bioepis. He is on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for Adiso, is a member of the Executive Committee for the IBD Education Group and is Co-Director of the CorEvitas Registry. M.D.L. has served as a consultant for AbbVie, UCB, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Salix, Valeant, Target Pharmasolutions and has received research support from Pfizer and Takeda. H.H.H. has served as a consultant for Alivio, AMAG, BMS, ExeGI Finch, Gilead, Janssen, Lycera, Merck, Otsuka, Pfizer, PureTech, Seres and has received research support from Pfizer and Artizan Biosciences. M.K., P.D.R.H., J.B., and C.A. have no relevant disclosures., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

Purpose of Review: The management of hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is complex. Despite considerable therapeutic advancements in outpatient ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease management, the in-hospital management continues to lag with suboptimal outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide a brief overview of our approach to managing patients hospitalized with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and Crohn's disease-related complications, followed by a summary of emerging evidence for new management approaches., Recent Findings: ASUC has seen the emergence of well validated prognostic models for colectomy as well as the development of novel treatment strategies such as accelerated infliximab dosing, Janus kinase inhibitor therapy, and sequential therapy, yet the rate of colectomy for steroid-refractory ASUC has not meaningfully improved. Crohn's disease has seen the development of better diagnostic tools, early Crohn's disease-related complication stratification and identification, as well as better surgical techniques, yet the rates of hospitalization and development of Crohn's disease-related complications remain high., Summary: Significant progress has been made in the in-hospital IBD management; however, both the management of ASUC and hospitalized Crohn's disease remain a challenge with suboptimal outcomes. Critical knowledge gaps still exist, and dedicated studies in hospitalized patients with IBD are needed to address them., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Self-efficacy, i.e., the confidence in one's capacity to perform a behavior, is crucial to the development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) self-management skills. We aimed to measure IBD self-efficacy and the relationship between self-efficacy and the patient-reported impact of IBD on daily life., Methods: We surveyed patients with IBD from a single academic center using the IBD Self-Efficacy Scale (IBD-SES) and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. The IBD-SES assesses 4 IBD domains: patients' confidence in managing stress and emotions, symptoms and disease, medical care, and remission. IBD PROs evaluate daily life impact, coping strategies, emotional impact, and systemic symptoms. We examined the association between IBD-SES domains with the lowest scores and IBD daily life impact., Results: A total of 160 patients completed the survey. Domain scores on the IBD-SES were lowest for managing stress and emotions (mean 6.76, SD 1.86) and symptoms and disease (mean 6.71, SD 2.12) on a 1-10 scale. Controlling for age, sex, IBD type, disease activity, moderate-to-severe disease, depression and anxiety, a higher confidence in managing stress and emotions (β -0.12, 95% confidence interval -0.20 to -0.05, P = 0.001), and managing symptoms and disease (β -0.28, 95% confidence interval -0.35 to -0.20, P < 0.001) were each associated with lower IBD daily life impact., Discussion: Patients with IBD report low confidence in managing stress and emotion and managing symptoms and disease. Higher self-efficacy in these domains was associated with lower IBD daily life impact. Self-management tools that promote self-efficacy in managing these domains have the potential to reduce IBD's daily life impact., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Dual targeted therapy (DTT) has emerged as an attractive therapeutic option for select patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are unable to achieve remission with biologic or small molecule monotherapy. We conducted a systematic review of specific DTT combinations in patients with IBD., Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library to identify articles related to the use of DTT for the treatment of Crohn Disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) published before February 2021., Results: Twenty-nine studies were identified comprising 288 patients started on DTT for partially or non-responsive IBD. We identified 14 studies with 113 patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and anti-integrin therapies (i.e., vedolizumab and natalizumab), 12 studies with 55 patients receiving vedolizumab and ustekinumab, nine studies with 68 patients receiving vedolizumab and tofacitinib, five studies with 24 patients receiving anti-TNF therapy and tofacitinib, six studies with 18 patients receiving anti-TNF therapy and ustekinumab, and three studies with 13 patients receiving ustekinumab and tofacitinib., Conclusion: DTT is a promising approach to improve IBD treatment for patients with incomplete responses to targeted monotherapy. Larger prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings as is additional predictive modeling to identify the patient subgroups most likely to require and benefit from this approach., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Data on the performance of newer biologics in patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) are limited., Objective: Our study's objective was to evaluate the response to ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with fistulizing CD., Design: Retrospective cohort., Methods: We used natural language processing of electronic medical record data to identify a retrospective cohort of individuals with fistulizing CD at a single academic tertiary-care referral center and then performed a chart review. Individuals were eligible for inclusion if a fistula was present at the time of UST or VDZ initiation. Outcomes included medication discontinuation, surgical intervention, development of a new fistula, and fistula closure. Groups were compared with unadjusted analyses and competing risk analyses using multi-state survival models., Results: In all, 68 patients were included (48 UST and 20 VDZ). Most patients had one fistula (79%) and had prior anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment (98% in UST group, 80% in VDZ group, p  = 0.01). VDZ was significantly more likely to be discontinued than UST ( p  < 0.0001), most frequently due to inadequate clinical response. Those on UST had a longer median time to surgery for CD than those on VDZ ( p  = 0.008). In those without surgical fistula repair, 79% on UST and 100% on VDZ still had an active fistula at 1 year ( p  = 0.30)., Conclusion: In individuals with fistulizing CD, our data suggest that UST has better clinical utility than VDZ based on lower rates of discontinuation, though the sample size is small. These findings highlight the importance of further research on the treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease., Competing Interests: Ryan W. Stidham has served as a consultant for Abbvie, Janssen, Merck, Takeda, Gilead, CorEvitas, Eli Lilly, Evergreen Pharmaceuticals; has research support from Abbvie and Janssen. Peter D. R. Higgins has served as a consultant for Abbvie, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. Kira L. Newman and Laura A. Johnson have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to report., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Background: Given rapid innovation in advanced therapies for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC), we investigated their comparative efficacy and safety during induction and maintenance through network meta-analysis., Methods: Using Bayesian methods, endpoints of clinical remission and clinical response per Full Mayo score, and endoscopic improvement were assessed in bio-naive and -exposed populations. Safety was assessed in overall populations by all adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, discontinuation due to AEs, and serious infections. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials were identified via systematic literature review, including the following advanced therapies: infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, golimumab, tofacitinib, ustekinumab, filgotinib, ozanimod, and upadacitinib. Random effects models were used to address between-study heterogeneity. Intent-to-treat (ITT) efficacy rates were calculated by adjusting maintenance outcomes by likelihood of induction response., Results: Out of 48 trials identified, 23 were included. Across all outcomes and regardless of prior biologic exposure, ITT efficacy rates were highest for upadacitinib, owing to its highest ranking for all efficacy outcomes in induction and for all but clinical remission during maintenance among bio-naive induction responders. For all advanced therapies versus placebo, there were no significant differences in serious AEs or serious infections across therapies. For all AEs, golimumab had higher odds versus placebo during maintenance; for discontinuation due to AEs, upadacitinib had lower odds versus placebo during induction, while ustekinumab and vedolizumab had lower odds versus placebo during maintenance., Conclusions: Upadacitinib may be the most efficacious therapy for moderately to severely active UC based on ITT analyses, with similar safety across advanced therapies., Competing Interests: R.P. has received consulting fees, speaker fees, and research support from AbbVie, Abbott, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Oppilan Pandion, Pharma, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Satisfai Health, Sandoz, Schering-Plough, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Theravance Biopharma, UCB, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. G.Y.M. has consulted for AbbVie, Arena, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb/Celgene, Entasis, Ferring, Janssen, Medtronic, Pfizer, Shionogi, Takeda, Techlab, and has received research grants from Pfizer. S.V. has received research grants from AbbVie, J&J, Pfizer, Galapagos, Takeda and has received consulting and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, AbolerIS Pharma, AgomAb, Alimentiv, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Avaxia, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, CVasThera, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech-Roche, Gilead, GSK, Hospira, Imidomics, Janssen, J&J, Lilly, Materia Prima, MiroBio, Morphic, MrMHealth, Mundipharma, MSD, Pfizer, Prodigest, Progenity, Prometheus, Robarts Clinical Trials, Second Genome, Shire, Surrozen, Takeda, Theravance, Tillots Pharma AG, and Zealand Pharma. S.D. has served as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Schering-Plough, AbbVie, Actelion, Alphawasserman, AstraZeneca, Cellerix, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Ferring, Genentech, Grunenthal, Johnson and Johnson, Millenium Takeda, MSD, Nikkiso Europe GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Nycomed, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, UCB Pharma, and Vifor. P.D.R.H. has received consultancy support from AbbVie, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly; and research grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly. Y.S.G., D.I., D.S., and W.Z. are AbbVie employees and may own AbbVie stock and/or options. E.B.C., C.S.K., and S.-T.W. have received consulting fees and research support from AbbVie., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of health care-associated infection and may result in organ dysfunction, colectomy, and death. Published risk scores to predict severe complications from CDI demonstrate poor performance upon external validation. We hypothesized that building and validating a model using geographically and temporally distinct cohorts would more accurately predict risk for complications from CDI., Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with CDI. After randomly partitioning the data into training and validation sets, we developed and compared 3 machine learning algorithms (lasso regression, random forest, stacked ensemble) with 10-fold cross-validation to predict disease-related complications (intensive care unit admission, colectomy, or death attributable to CDI) within 30 days of diagnosis. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC)., Results: A total of 3646 patients with CDI were included, of whom 217 (6%) had complications. All 3 models performed well (AUC, 0.88-0.89). Variables of importance were similar across models, including albumin, bicarbonate, change in creatinine, non-CDI-related intensive care unit admission, and concomitant non-CDI antibiotics. Sensitivity analyses indicated that model performance was robust even when varying derivation cohort inclusion and CDI testing approach. However, race was an important modifier, with models showing worse performance in non-White patients., Conclusions: Using a large heterogeneous population of patients, we developed and validated a prediction model that estimates risk for complications from CDI with good accuracy. Future studies should aim to reduce the disparity in model accuracy between White and non-White patients and to improve performance overall., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. P.D.R.H. received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Genentech, JBR Pharma, and Lycera. J.A.B. received consulting fees from Buhlmann Diagnostic Corp. K.R. is supported in part by an investigator-initiated grant from Merck & Co, Inc.; he has consulted for Bio-K+ International, Inc., Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Seres Therapeutics, Inc., and Summit Therapeutics, Inc. All other authors report no disclosures., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Preclinical animal as well as small exploratory ex vivo and in vivo human studies have suggested that bowel wall shear wave speed (SWS) measurements may be a noninvasive biomarker of intestinal damage., Objective: To evaluate the relationships between bowel wall stiffness, measured using ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE), and intestinal fibrosis and smooth muscle hypertrophy as determined by (1) histology and (2) second harmonic imaging microscopy (SHIM) in surgically resected ileal strictures from pediatric Crohn disease patients., Materials and Methods: Nineteen pediatric Crohn disease patients with symptomatic ileal strictures underwent research ultrasound examinations before surgical resection between December 2017 and September 2020. Two-dimensional SWE was performed through the area of the most severe stenosis, with measurements obtained from the bowel wall at the 9:00, 12:00 and 3:00 o'clock locations with 0%, 10% and 20% abdominal strain. Overall right lower quadrant stiffness also was documented. Median bowel wall and overall right lower quadrant SWS measurements were correlated with bowel wall histological scores of inflammation, fibrosis and smooth muscle proliferation as well as SHIM collagen signal., Results: Diagnostic ultrasound SWE imaging was obtained from 18 participants. The median age was 16.8 years. There were negative correlations between histological mucosal active inflammation and both bowel wall SWS with 10% abdominal strain (r=-0.50, P = 0.04) and overall right lower quadrant SWS with 20% abdominal strain (r=-0.69, P = 0.002). There were positive correlations between histological muscularis propria inner layer smooth muscle hypertrophy and both median bowel wall SWS with 10% abdominal strain (r = 0.72, P = 0.002) and overall right lower quadrant SWS with 20% abdominal strain (r = 0.71, P = 0.002). There were no associations between ultrasound stiffness metrics and bowel wall SHIM collagen measurements., Conclusion: Bowel wall and overall right lower quadrant ultrasound stiffness measurements correlate with mucosal active inflammation and muscularis propria smooth muscle hypertrophy in pediatric stricturing ileal Crohn disease, but not with intestinal fibrosis., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may respond differently to COVID-19 immunization as compared with healthy children or adults with IBD. Those younger than 12 years receive a lower vaccine dose than adults. We sought to describe the safety and humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccine in children with IBD., Methods: We recruited children with IBD, ages 5-17 years, who received ≥ 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine by a direct-to-patient outreach and at select sites. Patient demographics, IBD characteristics, medication use, and vaccine adverse events were collected. A subset of participants had quantitative measurement of anti-receptor binding domain IgG antibodies after 2-part immunization., Results: Our study population included 280 participants. Only 1 participant required an ED visit or hospitalization because of an adverse event. Of 99 participants who underwent anti-receptor binding domain IgG antibody measurement, 98 had a detectable antibody, with a mean antibody level of 43.0 μg/mL (SD 67) and a median of 22 μg/mL (interquartile range 12-38). In adjusted analyses, older age ( P = 0.028) and antitumor necrosis factor monotherapy compared with immunomodulators alone ( P = 0.005) were associated with a decreased antibody level. Antibody response in patients treated with antitumor necrosis factor combination vs monotherapy was numerically lower but not significant., Discussion: Humoral immune response to COVID-19 immunization in children with IBD was robust, despite a high proportion of this pediatric cohort being treated with immunosuppressive agents. Severe vaccine-related AEs were rare. Overall, these findings provide a high level of reassurance that pediatric patients with IBD respond well and safely to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination., (Copyright © 2022 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Highly connected individuals disseminate information effectively within their social network. To apply this concept to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care and lay the foundation for network interventions to disseminate high-quality treatment, we assessed the need for improving the IBD practices of highly connected clinicians. We aimed to examine whether highly connected clinicians who treat IBD patients were more likely to provide high-quality treatment than less connected clinicians., Methods: We used network analysis to examine connections among clinicians who shared patients with IBD in the Veterans Health Administration between 2015-2018. We created a network comprised of clinicians connected by shared patients. We quantified clinician connections using degree centrality (number of clinicians with whom a clinician shares patients), closeness centrality (reach via shared contacts to other clinicians), and betweenness centrality (degree to which a clinician connects clinicians not otherwise connected). Using weighted linear regression, we examined associations between each measure of connection and two IBD quality indicators: low prolonged steroids use, and high steroid-sparing therapy use., Results: We identified 62,971 patients with IBD and linked them to 1,655 gastroenterologists and 7,852 primary care providers. Clinicians with more connections (degree) were more likely to exhibit high-quality treatment (less prolonged steroids beta -0.0268, 95%CI -0.0427, -0.0110, more steroid-sparing therapy beta 0.0967, 95%CI 0.0128, 0.1805). Clinicians who connect otherwise unconnected clinicians (betweenness) displayed more prolonged steroids use (beta 0.0003, 95%CI 0.0001, 0.0006). The presence of variation is more relevant than its magnitude., Conclusions: Clinicians with a high number of connections provided more high-quality IBD treatments than less connected clinicians, and may be well-positioned for interventions to disseminate high-quality IBD care. However, clinicians who connect clinicians who are otherwise unconnected are more likely to display low-quality IBD treatment. Efforts to improve their quality are needed prior to leveraging their position to disseminate high-quality care., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2022 Cohen-Mekelburg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Pain is commonly experienced by patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Unfortunately, pain management is a challenge in IBD care, as currently available analgesics are associated with adverse events. Our understanding of the impact of opioid use on healthcare utilization among IBD patients remains limited., Methods: A systematic search was completed using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus through May of 2020. The exposure of interest was any opioid medication prescribed by a healthcare provider. Outcomes included readmissions rate, hospitalization, hospital length of stay, healthcare costs, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, IBD-related surgeries, and IBD-related medication utilization. Meta-analysis was conducted on study outcomes reported in at least 4 studies using random-effects models to estimate pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: We identified 1969 articles, of which 30 met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed an association between opioid use and longer length of stay (mean difference, 2.25 days; 95% CI, 1.29-3.22), higher likelihood of prior IBD-related surgery (RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.32-2.25), and higher rates of biologic use (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13-1.68) but no difference in 30-day readmissions (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.86-1.61), immunomodulator use (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89-1.44), or corticosteroid use (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.88-2.10) in patients with IBD. On systematic review, opioid use was associated with increased hospitalizations, healthcare costs, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and polypharmacy., Discussion: Opioids use among patients with IBD is associated with increased healthcare utilization. Nonopioid alternatives are needed to reduce burden on the healthcare system and improve patient outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CDC issued guidance advising patients and providers to adopt social distancing practices such as home-based infusions (H-BI)., Methods: We performed a mixed methods evaluation to summarize perceptions, concerns, and experiences with H-BI among all inflammatory bowel disease patients 18-90 years of age who transitioned to home-based infliximab or vedolizumab infusions between March to July 2020 at a tertiary care center. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using an iterative, inductive thematic approach. Baseline characteristics and outcome on safety, COVID-19 transmission, delays in infusions, and H-BI persistence were collected., Results: Of the 57 participants who transitioned to H-BI, 20 (33%) responded. Four major categories and six major themes related to expectations, experience, perceived safety, and logistical factors were identified. Initial perceptions were mixed, however these resolved. One patient developed COVID-19, one patient experienced an adverse event, 12 (21%) patients experienced an infusion delay, and 6 (11%) patients transitioned from H-BI., Discussion: Despite mixed initial perceptions, respondents had a positive experience with most respondents planning to continue H-BI after the pandemic resolves. Several real-world actionable barriers were identified related to scheduling, communication between stakeholders, and nursing quality. No major safety concerns were identified., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest PDRH received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Genentech, JBR Pharma and Lycera. All other authors report no disclosures., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with an increased risk of skin cancer. The aims of this study were to determine whether IBD susceptibility variants are also associated with skin cancer susceptibility and if such risk is augmented by use of immune-suppressive therapy., Methods: The discovery cohort included participants in the UK Biobank. The validation cohort included participants in the Michigan Genomics Initiative. The primary outcome of interest was skin cancer, subgrouped into nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) and melanoma skin cancers (MSC). Multivariable logistic regression with matched controls (3 controls:1 case) was performed to identify genomic predictors of skin malignancy in the discovery cohort. Variants with P < .05 were tested for replication in the validation cohort. Validated Single nucleotide polymorphisms were then evaluated for effect modification by immune-suppressive medications., Results: The discovery cohort included 10,247 cases of NMSC and 1883 cases of MSC. The validation cohort included 7334 cases of NMSC and 3304 cases of MSC. Twenty-nine variants were associated with risk of NMSC in the discovery cohort, of which 5 replicated in the validation cohort (increased risk, rs7773324-A [DUSP22; IRF4], rs2476601-G [PTPN22], rs1847472-C [BACH2], rs72810983-A [CPEB4]; decreased risk, rs6088765-G [PROCR; MMP24]). Twelve variants were associated with risk of MSC in the discovery cohort, of which 4 were replicated in the validation cohort (increased risk, rs61839660-T [IL2RA]; decreased risk, rs17391694-C [GIPC2; MGC27382], rs6088765-G [PROCR; MMP24], and rs1728785-C [ZFP90]). No effect modification was observed., Conclusions: The results of this study highlight shared genetic susceptibility across IBD and skin cancer, with increased risk of NMSC in those who carry risk variants in IRF4, PTPN22, CPEB4, and BACH2 and increased risk of MSC in those who carry a risk variant in IL2RA., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Many esophageal diseases can arise during development or throughout life. Therefore, well-characterized in vitro models and detailed methods are essential for studying human esophageal development, homeostasis and disease. Here, we (1) create an atlas of the cell types observed in the normal adult human esophagus; (2) establish an ancestrally diverse biobank of in vitro esophagus tissue to interrogate homeostasis and injury; and (3) benchmark in vitro models using the adult human esophagus atlas. We created a single-cell RNA sequencing reference atlas using fresh adult esophagus biopsies and a continuously expanding biobank of patient-derived in vitro cultures (n=55 lines). We identify and validate several transcriptionally distinct cell classes in the native human adult esophagus, with four populations belonging to the epithelial layer, including basal, epibasal, early differentiating and terminally differentiated luminal cells. Benchmarking in vitro esophagus cultures to the in vivo reference using single-cell RNA sequencing shows that the basal stem cells are robustly maintained in vitro, and the diversity of epithelial cell types in culture is dependent on cell density. We also demonstrate that cultures can be grown in 2D or as 3D organoids, and these methods can be employed for modeling the complete epithelial layers, thereby enabling in vitro modeling of the human adult esophagus., Competing Interests: Competing interests The authors declare no competing or financial interests., (© 2022. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.)

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination is recommended for all individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including those on immunosuppressive therapies; however, little is known about vaccine safety and efficacy in these patients or the impact of vaccination on IBD disease course., Methods: We evaluated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) and the effect of vaccination on IBD disease course among participants in the PREVENT-COVID (Partnership to Report Effectiveness of Vaccination in populations Excluded from iNitial Trials of COVID) study, a prospective, observational cohort study. Localized and systemic reactions were assessed via questionnaire. Disease flare was defined by worsening IBD symptoms and change in IBD medications. Outcomes were stratified by vaccine type and IBD medication classes., Results: A total of 3316 individuals with IBD received at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine. Injection site tenderness (68%) and fatigue (46% dose 1, 68% dose 2) were the most commonly reported localized and systemic AEs after vaccination. Severe localized and systemic vaccine-related AEs were rare. The mRNA-1273 vaccine was associated with significantly greater severe AEs at dose 2 (localized 4% vs 2%, systemic 15% vs 10%; P < .001 for both). Prior COVID-19 infection, female sex, and vaccine type were associated with severe systemic reactions to dose 1, while age <50 years, female sex, vaccine type, and antitumor necrosis factor and vedolizumab use were associated with severe systemic reactions to dose 2. Overall rates (2%) of IBD flare were low following vaccination., Conclusions: Our findings provide reassurance that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine is safe and well tolerated among individuals with IBD, which may help to combat vaccine hesitancy and increase vaccine confidence., (© 2021 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Much of our understanding about the natural history of pouch-related disorders has been generated from selected populations. We designed a geographically diverse, prospective registry to study the disease course among patients with 1 of 4 inflammatory conditions of the pouch. The primary objectives in this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of a prospective pouch registry and to evaluate the predominant treatment patterns for pouch-related disorders., Methods: We used standardized diagnostic criteria to prospectively enroll patients with acute pouchitis, chronic antibiotic-dependent pouchitis (CADP), chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP), or Crohn's disease (CD) of the pouch. We obtained detailed clinical and demographic data at the time of enrollment, along with patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures., Results: We enrolled 318 patients (10% acute pouchitis, 27% CADP, 12% CARP, and 51% CD of the pouch). Among all patients, 55% were on a biologic or small molecule therapy. Patients with CD of the pouch were more likely to use several classes of therapy ( P < .001). Among patients with active disease at the time of enrollment, 23% with CARP and 40% with CD of the pouch were in clinical remission at 6 months after enrollment., Conclusions: In a population where most patients had refractory inflammatory conditions of the pouch, we established a framework to evaluate PROs and clinical effectiveness. This infrastructure will be valuable for long-term studies of real-world effectiveness for pouch-related disorders., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

Background & Aims: Whether preoperative treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) increases the risk of postoperative infectious complications remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative exposure to TNFis is an independent risk factor for postoperative infectious complications within 30 days of surgery., Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study of patients with IBD undergoing intra-abdominal surgery across 17 sites from the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Clinical Research Alliance. Infectious complications were categorized as surgical site infections (SSIs) or non-SSIs. Current TNFi exposure was defined as use within 12 weeks of surgery, and serum was collected for drug-level analyses. Multivariable models for occurrence of the primary outcome, any infection, or SSI were adjusted by predefined covariates (age, sex, preoperative steroid use, and disease type), baseline variables significantly associated (P < .05) with any infection or SSI separately, and TNFi exposure status. Exploratory models used TNFi exposure based on serum drug concentration., Results: A total of 947 patients were enrolled from September 2014 through June 2017. Current TNFi exposure was reported by 382 patients. Any infection (18.1% vs 20.2%, P = .469) and SSI (12.0% vs 12.6%, P = .889) rates were similar in patients currently exposed to TNFis and those unexposed. In multivariable analysis, current TNFi exposure was not associated with any infection (odds ratio, 1.050; 95% confidence interval, 0.716-1.535) or SSI (odds ratio, 1.249; 95% confidence interval, 0.793-1.960). Detectable TNFi drug concentration was not associated with any infection or SSI., Conclusions: Preoperative TNFi exposure was not associated with postoperative infectious complications in a large prospective multicenter cohort., (Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a great unmet need for advanced therapies that provide rapid, robust, and sustained disease control for patients with ulcerative colitis. We assessed the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, as induction and maintenance therapy in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis., Methods: This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical programme consisted of two replicate induction studies (U-ACHIEVE induction [UC1] and U-ACCOMPLISH [UC2]) and a single maintenance study (U-ACHIEVE maintenance [UC3]). The studies were conducted across Europe, North and South America, Australasia, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific region at 199 clinical centres in 39 countries (UC1), 204 clinical centres in 40 countries (UC2), and 195 clinical centres in 35 countries (UC3). Patients aged 16-75 years with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (Adapted Mayo score 5-9; endoscopic subscore 2 or 3) for at least 90 days were randomly assigned (2:1) to oral upadacitinib 45 mg once daily or placebo for 8 weeks (induction studies). Patients who achieved clinical response following 8-week upadacitinib induction were re-randomly assigned (1:1:1) to upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo for 52 weeks (maintenance study). All patients were randomly assigned using web-based interactive response technology. The primary endpoints were clinical remission per Adapted Mayo score at week 8 (induction) and week 52 (maintenance). The efficacy analyses in the two induction studies were based on the intent-to-treat population, which included all randomised patients who received at least one dose of treatment. In the maintenance study, the primary efficacy analyses reported in this manuscript were based on the first 450 (planned) clinical responders to 8-week induction therapy with upadacitinib 45 mg once daily. The safety analysis population in the induction studies consisted of all randomised patients who received at least one dose of treatment; in the maintenance study, this population included all patients who received at least one dose of treatment as part of the primary analysis population. These studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02819635 (U-ACHIEVE) and NCT03653026 (U-ACCOMPLISH)., Findings: Between Oct 23, 2018, and Sept 7, 2020, 474 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 45 mg once daily (n=319) or placebo (n=155) in UC1. Between Dec 6, 2018, and Jan 14, 2021, 522 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 45 mg once daily (n=345) or placebo (n=177) in UC2. In UC3, a total of 451 patients (21 from the phase 2b study, 278 from UC1, and 152 from UC2) who achieved a clinical response after 8 weeks of upadacitinib induction treatment were randomly assigned again to upadacitinib 15 mg (n=148), upadacitinib 30 mg (n=154), and placebo (n=149) in the primary analysis population. Statistically significantly more patients achieved clinical remission with upadacitinib 45 mg (83 [26%] of 319 patients in UC1 and 114 [34%] of 341 patients in UC2) than in the placebo group (seven [5%] of 154 patients in UC1 and seven [4%] of 174 patients; p<0·0001; adjusted treatment difference 21·6% [95% CI 15·8-27·4] for UC1 and 29·0% [23·2-34·7] for UC2). In the maintenance study, clinical remission was achieved by statistically significantly more patients receiving upadacitinib (15 mg 63 [42%] of 148; 30 mg 80 [52%] of 154) than those receiving placebo (18 [12%] of 149; p<0·0001; adjusted treatment difference 30·7% [21·7-39·8] for upadacitinib 15 mg vs placebo and 39·0% [29·7-48·2] for upadacitinib 30 mg vs placebo). The most commonly reported adverse events in UC1 were nasopharyngitis (15 [5%] of 319 in the upadacitinib 45 mg group vs six [4%] of 155 in the placebo group), creatine phosphokinase elevation (15 [4%] vs three [2%]), and acne (15 [5%] vs one [1%]). In UC2, the most frequently reported adverse event was acne (24 [7%] of 344 in the upadacitinib 45 mg group vs three [2%] of 177 in the placebo group). In both induction studies, serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were less frequent in the upadacitinib 45 mg group than in the placebo group (serious adverse events eight [3%] vs nine (6%) in UC1 and 11 [3%] vs eight [5%] in UC2; adverse events leading to discontinuation six [2%] vs 14 [9%] in UC1 and six [2%] vs nine [5%] in UC2). In UC3, the most frequently reported adverse events (≥5%) were worsening of ulcerative colitis (19 [13%] of 148 in the upadacitinib 15 mg group vs 11 [7%] of 154 in the upadacitinib 30 mg group vs 45 [30%] of 149 in the placebo group), nasopharyngitis (18 [12%] vs 22 [14%] vs 15 [10%]), creatine phosphokinase elevation (nine [6%] vs 13 [8%] vs three [2%]), arthralgia (nine [6%] vs five [3%] vs 15 [10%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (seven [5%] vs nine [6%] vs six [4%]). The proportion of serious adverse events (ten [7%] vs nine [6%] vs 19 [13%]) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (six [4%] vs ten [6%] vs 17 [11%]) was lower in both upadacitinib groups than in the placebo group. Events of cancer, adjudicated major adverse cardiac events, or venous thromboembolism were reported infrequently. There were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Upadacitinib demonstrated a positive efficacy and safety profile and could be an effective treatment option for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis., Funding: AbbVie., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SD reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD), Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, TiGenix, UCB, and Vifor. SV reports grants from AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Galapagos, and Takeda; and consulting or speaking fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts Clinical Trials), Arena Pharmaceuticals, Avaxia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech-Roche, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Mundipharma, MSD, Pfizer, Prodigest, Progenity, Prometheus, Second Genome, Shire, Takeda, Theravance, and Tillots Pharma. WZ, YSG, BH, WX, and JL are full-time employees of AbbVie, and might hold AbbVie stock or stock options. MAW and ALP are former employees of AbbVie, and might hold AbbVie stock or stock options. JS has received support, consulting fees, and speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Allergan, Takeda, Ferring, Shire, and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals. XH reports support from AbbVie, Abivax, Alphasigma, Arena, Cellgen, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Enterome, Janssen, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Promotheus, Roche, Salix, Sangamo, Takeda, and Theravance for clinical research; consulting fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Arena, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Sangamo, Takeda, and Viatris; and lecture fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Amgen, Arena, Galapagos, Gilead, Fresenius-Kabi, Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, Sangamo, Takeda, and Mylan. GD has served as an advisor for AbbVie, Ablynx, Active Biotech, Agomab Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Allergan, Alphabiomics, Amakem, Amgen, AM Pharma, Applied Molecular Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, Avaxia, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Cosmo, DSM Pharma, Echo Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Engene, Exeliom Biosciences, Ferring, Dr Falk Pharma, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamerbio, Immunic, Johnson & Johnson, Kintai Therapeutics, Lument, Lycera, Medimetrics, Medtronic, Mitsubishi Pharma, MSD, Mundipharma, Nextbiotics, Novonordisk, Otsuka, Photopill, ProciseDx, Prodigest, Prometheus Laboratories/Nestle, Progenity, Protagonist, RedHill, Salix, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz, Seres/Nestec/Nestle, Setpoint, Shire, Teva, Takeda, Tigenix, Tillotts, Topivert, Versant, and Vifor; and has received speaker fees from AbbVie, Biogen, Ferring, Galapagos/Gilead, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Mundipharma, Norgine, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Shire, Millennium/Takeda, Tillotts, and Vifor. HN has received support from AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Daiichi Sankyo Company, EA Pharma, Janssen, JIMRO, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical; and grants for commissioned or joint research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Hoya Group Pentax Medical. JP has received grants from AbbVie and Pfizer; consultancy fees or honorarium from AbbVie, Arena, Athos, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Janssen, Mirum, Morphic, Nestlé, Origo, Pandion, Pfizer, Progenity, Takeda, Theravance, and Wasserman; support for travel to meetings from AbbVie and Takeda during the conduct of the study; payment for lectures, including service on speaker bureaux, from Abbott, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda; and payment for development of educational presentations from Abbott, Janssen, Pfizer, and Roche. PDRH has received grants from AbbVie, Connectome Coordination Facility, National Institute of Health, and Takeda; and has served as a consultant for Eli Lilly, Takeda, Pfizer, Vindico Medical Education, Imedex, and GI Health Foundation. PJ has received consulting or speaker fees from AbbVie, Arena, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Janssen Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, UCB Pharma, and Vifor; and investigator-led research grants from Vifor. JOL has received consulting or speaker fees from AbbVie, Allergan (Warner Chilcott), Atlantic Healthcare, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Napp, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda, and Vifor; and investigator-led research grants from AbbVie, Gilead, Pfizer, Shire, and Takeda. EVL has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calibr, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer Bio, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Ono Pharma, Pfizer, Scipher Medicine, Sun Pharma, Takeda, and UCB; and research support from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Pfizer, Receptos, Alimentiv, Takeda, Theravance, and UCB. WJS has received research grants from AbbVie, Abivax, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Seres Therapeutics, Shire, Takeda, and Theravance Biopharma; consulting fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Admirx, Alfasigma, Alimentiv, Alivio Therapeutics, Allakos, Allergan, Amgen, Applied Molecular Transport, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Avexegen Therapeutics, Bausch Health (Salix), Beigene, Bellatrix Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cellularity, Conatus, Cosmo Pharmaceuticals, Escalier Biosciences, Ferring, Forbion, Equillium, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Gossamer Bio, Immunic (Vital Therapies), Incyte, Index Pharmaceuticals, Intact Therapeutics, Janssen, Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Research, Kyverna Therapeutics, Landos Biopharma, Lilly, Miraca Life Sciences, Nivalis Therapeutics, Novartis, Nutrition Science Partners, Oppilan Pharma (acquired by Ventyx Biosciences), Otsuka, Pandion Therapeutics, Paul Hastings, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Protagonists Therapeutics, Provention Bio, Reistone Biopharma, Ritter Pharmaceuticals, Seres Therapeutics, Shanghai Pharma Biotherapeutics, Shire, Shoreline Biosciences, Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, Sigmoid Biotechnologies, Sterna Biologicals, Sublimity Therapeutics, Surrozen, Takeda, Theravance Biopharma, Thetis Pharmaceuticals, Tigenix, Tillotts Pharma, UCB Pharma, Vendata Biosciences, Ventyx Biosciences, Vimalan Biosciences, Vivelix Pharmaceuticals, Vivreon Biosciences, Zealand Pharma; stock or stock options from Allakos, BeiGene, Gossamer Bio, Oppilan Pharma (acquired by Ventyx Biosciences), Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Progenity, Shoreline Biosciences, Ventyx Biosciences, Vimalan Biosciences, and Vivreon Biosciences; and is an employee at Shoreline Biosciences. His spouse is a consultant (with stock options) for Iveric Bio, Oppilan Pharma (acquired by Ventyx Biosciences), Prometheus Laboratories; has stock or stock options from Progenity, Ventyx Biosciences, Vimalan Biosciences; and is employed (with stock options) at Prometheus Biosciences. WR has served as a speaker for Abbott, AbbVie, Aesca, Aptalis, Astellas, Centocor, Celltrion, Danone Austria, Elan, Falk Pharma, Ferring, Immundiagnostik, Medice, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Otsuka, PDL, Pharmacosmos, PLS Education, Schering-Plough, Shire, Takeda, Therakos, Vifor, and Yakult; served as a consultant for Abbott, AbbVie, Aesca, Algernon, Amgen, AM Pharma, AMT, AOP Orphan, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Avaxia, Roland Berger, Bioclinica, Biogen IDEC, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calyx, Cellerix, Chemocentryx, Celgene, Centocor, Celltrion, Covance, Danone Austria, DSM, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ernest & Young, Falk Pharma, Ferring, Galapagos, Gatehouse Bio, Genentech, Gilead, Grünenthal, ICON, Index Pharma, Inova, Intrinsic Imaging, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Landos Biopharma, Lipid Therapeutics, LivaNova, Mallinckrodt, Medahead, MedImmune, Millennium, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Nash Pharmaceuticals, Nestle, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ocera, OMass, Otsuka, Parexel, PDL, Periconsulting, Pharmacosmos, Philip Morris Institute, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Prometheus, Protagonist, Provention, Quell Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Sandoz, Schering-Plough, Second Genome, Seres Therapeutics, Setpointmedical, Sigmoid, Sublimity, Takeda, Teva Pharma, Therakos, Theravance, Tigenix, UCB, Vifor, Zealand, Zyngenia, and 4SC; served as an advisory board member for Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie, Aesca, Amgen, AM Pharma, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Avaxia, Biogen IDEC, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cellerix, Chemocentryx, Celgene, Centocor, Celltrion, Danone Austria, DSM, Elan, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech, Grünenthal, Inova, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, Lipid Therapeutics, MedImmune, Millennium, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, MSD, Nestle, Novartis, Ocera, Otsuka, PDL, Pharmacosmos, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, Prometheus, Sandoz, Schering-Plough, Second Genome, Setpointmedical, Takeda, Therakos, Tigenix, UCB, Zealand, Zyngenia, and 4SC; and has received research funding from Abbott, AbbVie, Aesca, Centocor, Falk Pharma, Immundiagnostik, Janssen, MSD, Sandoz, and Takeda. M-HC has received support for clinical research from Janssen and Takeda; served as an advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen; and provided educational activities for AbbVie, China Medical System, IPSEN, Janssen, and Takeda. RP has received consulting fees, speaker fees, and research support from AbbVie, Abbott, Alimentiv, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Glaxo-Smith Kline, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Oppilan Pharma, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Satisfai Health, Sandoz, Schering-Plough, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Theravance Biopharma, UCB, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. SG declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Approximately 33% of Crohn's disease (CD) patients have associated autoimmune skin disease. The pathophysiology of the latter frequently involves interleukin-12/interleukin-23 signaling pathways that may also impact gut inflammation. Ustekinumab is an anti-IL-12/23 FDA-approved biologic for psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease. However, its relative efficacy has never been studied in CD with autoimmune skin disease (CD-ASD) vs CD without autoimmune skin disease (CD-none)., Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center, case-control study comparing markers of disease activity between CD-ASD and CD-none. Biomarkers (fecal calprotectin [FCP], C-reactive protein [CRP]) prior to drug initiation and after at least 5 months of standard IBD dose ustekinumab therapy were extracted from the medical record. In addition, 2 blinded observers performed 5-point Likert scoring before and after endoscopic, pathologic, and imaging reports., Results: In all, 395 CD patients received ustekinumab therapy (79 CD-ASD, 316 CD-none). Patients were similar in age; gender; ethnicity; CD severity, phenotype, and duration; tobacco, immunomodulator, and steroid use. Ustekinumab had greater efficacy in CD-ASD when evaluated by FCP (P = .0337) and CRP (P = .078). The CD-ASD group also showed better outcomes in Likert scores of endoscopy (P = .016), histopathology (P = .074), and imaging (P = .094). In all Likert parameters, CD-ASD had more patients with complete resolution of moderate/severe disease (P < .05). Additional subanalyses for surgeries, ulcers, abscesses, fistulas, and colitis were conducted, with colitis reaching statistical significance (P = .0011)., Conclusions: Concurrent autoimmune skin disease in CD is associated with greater ustekinumab effectiveness in controlling intestinal inflammation., (© 2021 Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

In our previous studies, we have demonstrated the feasibility of characterizing intestinal inflammation and fibrosis using endoscopic photoacoustic imaging. Purposed at te clinical translation of the imaging technology, we developed a photoacoustic/ultrasound imaging probe by integrating a miniaturized ultrasound array and an angle-tipped optical fiber in a hydrostatic balloon catheter. When collapsed, the catheter probe may potentially be compatible with a clinical ileo-colonoscope. In addition, the flexible surface of the hydrostatic balloon allows for acoustic coupling at the uneven surfaces of the gas-filled intestine. Tissue phantom studies show that the catheter probe possesses an imaging penetration of at least 12 mm. Experiments with a rabbit model in vivo validated the probe in differentiating normal, acute and chronic conditions in intestinal obstruction., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement.)

NOTCH signaling is a key regulator involved in maintaining intestinal stem cell (ISC) homeostasis and for balancing differentiation. Using single-cell transcriptomics, we observed that OLFM4, a NOTCH target gene present in ISCs, is first expressed at 13 weeks post-conception in the developing human intestine and increases over time. This led us to hypothesize that the requirement for NOTCH signaling is acquired across human development. To test this, we established a series of epithelium-only organoids (enteroids) from different developmental stages and used γ-secretase inhibitors (dibenzazepine [DBZ] or DAPT) to functionally block NOTCH signaling. Using quantitative enteroid-forming assays, we observed a decrease in enteroid forming efficiency in response to γ-secretase inhibition as development progress. When DBZ was added to cultures and maintained during routine passaging, enteroids isolated from tissue before 20 weeks had higher recovery rates following single-cell serial passaging. Finally, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis 1 day and 3 days after DBZ treatment showed major differences in the transcriptional changes between developing or adult enteroids. Collectively, these data suggest that ISC dependence on NOTCH signaling increases as the human intestine matures., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with substantial symptom burden, variability in clinical outcomes, and high direct costs. We sought to determine if a care coordination-based strategy was effective at improving patient symptom burden and reducing healthcare costs for patients with IBD in the top quintile of predicted healthcare utilization and costs., Methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a patient-tailored multicomponent care coordination intervention composed of proactive symptom monitoring and care coordinator-triggered algorithms. Enrolled patients with IBD were randomized to usual care or to our care coordination intervention over a 9-month period (April 2019 to January 2020). Primary outcomes included change in patient symptom scores throughout the intervention and IBD-related charges at 12 months., Results: Eligible IBD patients in the top quintile for predicted healthcare utilization and expenditures were identified. A total of 205 patients were enrolled and randomized to our intervention (n = 100) or to usual care (n = 105). Patients in the care coordinator arm demonstrated an improvement in symptoms scores compared with usual care (coefficient, -0.68, 95% confidence interval, -1.18 to -0.18; P = .008) without a significant difference in median annual IBD-related healthcare charges ($10,094 vs $9080; P = .322)., Conclusions: In this first randomized controlled trial of a patient-tailored care coordination intervention, composed of proactive symptom monitoring and care coordinator-triggered algorithms, we observed an improvement in patient symptom scores but not in healthcare charges. Care coordination programs may represent an effective value-based approach to improve symptoms scores without added direct costs in a subgroup of high-risk patients with IBD. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT04796571)., (Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Intestinal strictures are a common complication of Crohn's disease (CD). Biomarkers of intestinal strictures would assist in their prediction, diagnosis, and monitoring. Herein we provide a comprehensive systematic review of studies assessing biomarkers that may predict or diagnose CD-associated strictures., Methods: We performed a systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify citations pertaining to biomarkers of intestinal fibrosis through July 6, 2020, that used a reference standard of full-thickness histopathology or cross-sectional imaging or endoscopy. Studies were categorized based on the type of biomarker they evaluated (serum, genetic, histopathologic, or fecal)., Results: Thirty-five distinct biomarkers from 3 major groups were identified: serum (20 markers), genetic (9 markers), and histopathology (6 markers). Promising markers include cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, hepatocyte growth factor activator, and lower levels of microRNA-19-3p (area under the curves were 0.805, 0.738, and 0.67, respectively), and multiple anti-flagellin antibodies (A4-Fla2 [odds ratio, 3.41], anti Fla-X [odds ratio, 2.95], and anti-CBir1 [multiple]). Substantial heterogeneity was observed and none of the markers had undergone formal validation. Specific limitations to acceptance of these markers included failure to use a standardized definition of stricturing disease, lack of specificity, and insufficient relevance to the pathogenesis of intestinal strictures or incomplete knowledge regarding their operating properties., Conclusions: There is a lack of well-defined studies on biomarkers of intestinal stricture. Development of reliable and accurate biomarkers of stricture is a research priority. Biomarkers can support the clinical management of CD patients and aid in the stratification and monitoring of patients during clinical trials of future antifibrotic drug candidates., (Copyright © 2022 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Although an additional coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine dose for immunocompromised persons has been recommended in some countries, further data to guide vaccination strategies for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are urgently needed. We sought to identify factors affecting initial humoral immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines among patients with IBD., Methods: In this prospective cohort of SARS-CoV-2 immunized patients with IBD, we evaluated associations between participant age, sex, vaccine type, medication use, and the presence of a detectable antireceptor binding domain antibody and quantitative antibody level., Results: In total, 1,909 participants were included (1,123, 692, and 94 received BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and Ad26.COV2.S, respectively) of whom 96% achieved a positive antibody response. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with lack of antibody response were older age (P = 0.043), BNT162b2 vs mRNA-1273 (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.9), and combination therapy with anti-TNF and 6MP, azathioprine, or methotrexate (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.4-7.3). The use of 5-aminosalicylate or sulfasalazine (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8) and ustekinumab (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.8) was associated with decreased odds of lacking antibody response., Discussion: Most patients with IBD mount an initial response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, older patients and those treated with anti-TNF and immunomodulator have blunted responses and may benefit the most from an additional vaccine dose. Patients treated with other classes of immunosuppressive medications have more robust initial immune responses to vaccination. These data should inform key decisions about patient selection for additional coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine doses in patients with IBD., (Copyright © 2021 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)