Search

Background: There has been tremendous effort to improve quality following colorectal surgery, including the proliferation of minimally invasive techniques, enhanced recovery protocols, and surgical site infection prevention bundles. While these programs have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes at the institutional level, it is unclear whether similar benefits are present on a national scale., Methods: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Targeted Colectomy data from 2012 to 2020 were used to identify patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open partial colectomy (CPT 44140, 44204) or low anterior resection (CPT 44145, 44207). Chronological cohorts as well as annual trends in 30-day postoperative outcomes including surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, and length of stay were assessed using both univariable and multivariable regression analyses., Results: 261,301 patients, 135,876 (52 ​%) female, with a median age of 62 (IQR 53-72) were included. Across all years, MIS partial colectomy was the most common procedure (37 ​%), followed by MIS low anterior resection (27 ​%), open partial colectomy (24 ​%), and open low anterior resection (12 ​%). MIS increased from 59 ​% in 2012-2014 to 66 ​% in 2018-2020 (p ​< ​0.001). During this same period, postoperative length of stay decreased from a median of 5 days (IQR 4-7) in 2012-2014 to 4 days (IQR 3-6) in 2018-2020 (p ​< ​0.001). Superficial surgical site infections decreased from 5.5 ​% in 2012-2014 to 2.9 ​% in 2018-2020 (p ​< ​0.001). Deep surgical site infections similarly decreased from 1.1 ​% to 0.4 ​% between these periods (p ​< ​0.001). Pulmonary embolism also decreased from 0.6 ​% to 0.5 ​% between periods (p ​= ​0.02). 30-day mortality was unchanged at 1.7 ​% between 2012-2014 and 2018-2020 (p ​= ​0.40). After adjustment for ACS NSQIP estimated probability of morbidity and mortality, undergoing a colectomy in 2020 compared to 2012 was associated with a 14 ​% decrease in postoperative length of stay (p ​< ​0.001)., Conclusions: Between 2012 and 2020, significant improvements in postoperative outcomes after colectomy were observed in the United States. These results support the positive impact that the widespread adoption of quality improvement initiatives is having on colorectal patient care nationally., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The rate of anal squamous cell cancer (aSCC) is increasing among women living with HIV. Treatment of precursor high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) may reduce the risk of progression to aSCC. The objective of this study was to examine effects of a dedicated high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) clinic on management of HSIL in women with HIV., Methods: Women living with HIV who underwent anal dysplasia screening at a single institution between 2006 and 2020 were reviewed. Those who underwent screening before (Group A) and after (Group B) the implementation of an HRA program in 2017 were compared. The primary outcome of interest was the successful detection and treatment of HSIL., Results: A total of 201 women living with HIV underwent anal dysplasia screening between 2006 and 2020. Seventy-seven patients were found to have abnormal anal cytology requiring further treatment: 43 (55.8%) in Group A and 34 (44.2%) patients in Group B. Of the patients with abnormal anal cytology, 76.7% of patients in Group A received further biopsy and treatment, whereas 79.4% of Group B patients underwent subsequent biopsy and treatment. In propensity score weighting logistic regression analysis, the Group B was 4.6 times as likely to diagnosis HSIL on biopsy compared to Group A (OR = 4.60, 95% CI: 1.15 to 18.38, P = .03)., Conclusions: Anal dysplasia is common among women living with HIV. The establishment of a HRA program was associated with increased identification and treatment of HSIL among women living with HIV, which may prevent the progression to aSCC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of recommended colorectal cancer screening exist; however, the impact of social determinants of health on such disparities has not been recently studied in a national cohort., Objective: This study aimed to determine whether social determinants of health attenuate racial disparities in receipt of colorectal cancer screening., Design: This was a cross-sectional telephone survey of self-reported race and ethnicity and up-to-date colorectal cancer screening. Associations between race/ethnicity and colorectal cancer screening were tested before and after adjustment for demographics, behavioral factors, and social determinants of health., Setting: This was a nationally representative telephone survey of US residents in 2018., Patients: The patients included were US residents aged 50 to 75 years., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was up-to-date colorectal cancer screening status, according to 2008 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations., Results: This study included 226,106 respondents aged 50 to 75 years. Before adjustment, all minority racial and ethnic groups demonstrated a significantly lower odds of screening than those of non-Hispanic white respondents. After adjustment for demographics, behavioral factors, and social determinants of health, compared to non-Hispanic white respondents, odds of screening were found to be increased among non-Hispanic black respondents (OR, 1.10; p = 0.02); lower but attenuated among Hispanic respondents (OR, 0.73; p < 0.001), non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native respondents (OR, 0.85; p = 0.048), and non-Hispanic respondents of other races (OR, 0.82; p = 0.01); and lower but not attenuated among non-Hispanic Asian respondents (OR, 0.68; p < 0.001)., Limitations: Recall bias, participant bias, and residual confounding., Conclusions: Adjustment for social determinants of health reduced racial and ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening among all minority racial and ethnic groups except non-Hispanic Asian individuals; however, other unmeasured confounders likely exist. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B977 ., Asociacin De Raza, Etnicidad Y Determinantes Sociales De La Salud Con La Deteccin Del Cncer Colorrectal: ANTECEDENTES: Existen disparidades raciales y étnicas en la recepción de las pruebas recomendadas de detección de cáncer colorrectal; sin embargo, el impacto de los determinantes sociales de la salud en dichas disparidades no se ha estudiado recientemente en una cohorte nacional.OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar si los determinantes sociales de la salud atenúan las disparidades raciales en la recepción de pruebas de detección del cáncer colorrectal.DISEÑO: Encuesta telefónica transversal de raza y etnia autoinformada y detección actualizada de cáncer colorrectal. Las asociaciones entre la raza/etnicidad y la detección del cáncer colorrectal se probaron antes y después del ajuste por demografía, factores conductuales y determinantes sociales de la salud.ESCENARIO: Esta fue una encuesta telefónica representativa a nivel nacional de los residentes de EE. UU. en 2018.PACIENTES: Los pacientes eran residentes de EE. UU. de 50 a 75 años.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Estado actualizado de detección de cáncer colorrectal, según las recomendaciones del Grupo de Trabajo de Servicios Preventivos de EE. UU. de 2008.RESULTADOS: Este estudio incluyó a 226.106 encuestados de 50 a 75 años. Antes del ajuste, todos los grupos étnicos y raciales minoritarios demostraron probabilidades significativamente más bajas de detección en comparación con los encuestados blancos no hispanos. Después del ajuste por demografía, factores conductuales y determinantes sociales de la salud, en comparación con los encuestados blancos no hispanos, las probabilidades de detección aumentaron entre los encuestados negros no hispanos (OR 1,10, p = 0,02); más bajo pero atenuado entre los encuestados hispanos (OR 0,73, p < 0,001), los encuestados indios americanos/nativos de Alaska no hispanos (OR 0,85, p = 0,048) y los encuestados no hispanos de otras razas (OR 0,82, p = 0,01); y menor pero no atenuado entre los encuestados asiáticos no hispanos (OR 0,68, p < 0,001).LIMITACIONES: Sesgo de recuerdo y sesgo de participante, así como confusión residual.CONCLUSIONES: El ajuste para los determinantes sociales de la salud redujo las disparidades raciales y étnicas en la detección del cáncer colorrectal entre todos los grupos étnicos y raciales minoritarios, excepto las personas asiáticas no hispanas; sin embargo, es probable que existan otros factores de confusión no medidos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B977 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio )., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2022.)

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) are dedicated to ensuring high-quality innovative patient care for surgical patients by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus as well as minimally invasive surgery. The ASCRS and SAGES society members involved in the creation of these guidelines were chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery and enhanced recovery. This consensus document was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, healthcare workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. This clinical practice guideline represents a collaborative effort between the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and was approved by both societies., (© 2022. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS).)

Background: High airway driving pressure is associated with adverse outcomes in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation, but large multicentre studies investigating airway driving pressure during major surgery are lacking. We hypothesised that increased driving pressure is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery., Methods: In this preregistered multicentre retrospective observational cohort study, the authors reviewed major abdominal surgical procedures in 11 hospitals from 2004 to 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative pulmonary complications, defined as postoperative pneumonia, unplanned tracheal intubation, or prolonged mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h. Associations between intraoperative dynamic driving pressure and outcomes, adjusted for patient and procedural factors, were evaluated., Results: Among 14 218 qualifying cases, 389 (2.7%) experienced postoperative pulmonary complications. After adjustment, the mean dynamic driving pressure was associated with postoperative pulmonary complications (adjusted odds ratio for every 1 cm H 2 O increase: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.06; P <0.001). Neither tidal volume nor PEEP was associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Increased BMI, shorter height, and female sex were predictors for higher dynamic driving pressure (β=0.35, 95% CI 0.32-0.39, P <0.001; β=-0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.00, P =0.005; and β=0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86, P <0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: Dynamic airway driving pressure, but not tidal volume or PEEP, is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications in models controlling for a large number of risk predictors and covariates. Such models are capable of risk prediction applicable to individual patients., Competing Interests: Declarations of interest DAC reports research funding (paid to institution) unrelated to the presented work from Merck & Co. Inc. (Rahway, NJ, USA). All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Background: As enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) have continued to evolve, the length of hospitalization (LOS) following elective minimally invasive colorectal surgery has continued to decline. Further refinements in multimodal perioperative pain management strategies have resulted in reduced opioid consumption. The interest in ambulatory colectomy has dramatically accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Severe restrictions in hospital capacity and fear of COVID transmission forced surgical teams to rethink strategies to further reduce length of inpatient stay., Methods: Members of the SAGES Colorectal Surgery Committee began reviewing the emergence of SDD protocols and early publications for SDD in 2019. The authors met at regular intervals during 2020-2022 period reviewing SDD protocols, safe patient selection criteria, surrogates for postoperative monitoring, and early outcomes., Results: Early experience with SDD protocols for elective, minimally invasive colorectal surgery suggests that SDD is feasible and safe in well-selected patients and procedures. SDD protocols are associated with reduced opioid use and prescribing. Patient perception and experience with SDD is favourable. For early adopters, SDD has been the natural evolution of well-developed ERPs. Like all ERPs, SDD begins in the office setting, identifying the correct patient and procedure, aligning goals and objectives, and the perioperative education of the patient and their supporting significant others. A thorough discussion with the patient regarding expected activity levels, oral intake, and pain control post operatively lays the foundation for a successful application of SDD programs. These observations may not apply to all patient populations, institutions, practice types, or within the scope of an existing ERP. However, if the underlying principles of SDD can be incorporated into an existing institutional ERP, it may further reduce the incidence of post operative ileus, prolonged LOS, and improve the effectiveness of oral analgesia for postoperative pain management and reduced opioid use and prescribing., Conclusions: The SAGES Colorectal Surgery Committee has performed a comprehensive review of the early experience with SDD. This manuscript summarizes SDD early results and considerations for safe and stepwise implementation of SDD with a specific focus on ERP evolution, patient selection, remote monitoring, and other relevant considerations based on hospital settings and surgical practices., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

The management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved significantly over the last decade owing to advances in aggressive multimodality chemotherapy options, targeted therapy, development of sophisticated operative techniques, and adjunct radiotherapy options. Patients with synchronous CRC require complex decision-making with multidisciplinary collaboration to develop individualized treatment strategies taking into account tumor biology and patients' individual goals and objectives. We will outline important considerations with regard to treatment options for patients with synchronous metastatic CRC to facilitate contemporary evidence-based management decisions and optimize oncologic outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure T.L. Hedrick – consultant with Johnson and Johnson, V.M. Zaydfudim – none., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women surgeons face numerous barriers to career advancement. Inequitable citation of surgical literature may represent a contributing factor to gender disparities in academic surgery., Study Design: This was a cross-sectional analysis of publications from 50 top-ranking surgery journals in 2017 and 2018, as defined by the 2019 InCites Journal Citation Reports. The citation rate of publications by women vs men first authors was compared. Similarly, the citation rate of publications by men vs women last authors was also compared. Adjusted regression analyses of citation rates accounted for the time interval since publication as well as the journal within which the article was published, among other potential confounding factors., Results: A total of 19,084 publications from 48 surgery journals with a median (interquartile range) of 8 (4 to 15) citations contributing to a median (interquartile range) Journal Impact Factor of 4.0 (3.4 to 4.6) were analyzed. Compared with man-first author publications, woman-first author publications demonstrated a 9% lower citation rate (incidence rate ratio 0.91, p < 0.001). Similarly, compared with publications by man-last authors, woman-last author publications demonstrated a 4% lower citation rate (incidence rate ratio 0.96, p = 0.03). These associations persisted after multivariable adjustment for additional confounding factors, however, not on sensitivity analysis of 24 of the highest-ranking journals., Conclusions: Among top-tier surgical journals, publications by women-first and -last authors were less cited compared with publications by men-first and -last authors, but not among the highest-tier surgical journals. Gender bias may exist in the citation of surgical research, contributing to gender disparities in academic surgery., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: While total sleep duration and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep duration have been associated with long-term mortality in non-surgical cohorts, the impact of preoperative sleep on postoperative outcomes has not been well studied., Methods: In this secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study, patients who recorded at least 1 sleep episode using a consumer wearable device in the 7 days before elective colorectal surgery were included. 30-day postoperative outcomes among those who did and did not receive at least 6 h of total sleep, as well as those who did and did not receive at least 1 h of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, were compared., Results: 34 out of 95 (35.8%) patients averaged at least 6 h of sleep per night, while 44 out of 82 (53.7%) averaged 1 h or more of REM sleep. Patients who slept less than 6 h had similar postoperative outcomes compared to those who slept 6 h or more. Patients who averaged less than 1 h of REM sleep, compared to those who achieved 1 h or more of REM sleep, had significantly higher rates of complication development (29.0% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.02), and return to the OR (10.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.04). After adjustment for confounding factors, increased REM sleep duration remained significantly associated with decreased complication development (increase in REM sleep from 50 to 60 min: OR 0.72, P = 0.009; REM sleep ≥ 1 h: OR 0.22, P = 0.03)., Conclusion: In this cohort of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, those who developed a complication within 30 days were less likely to average at least 1 h of REM sleep in the week before surgery than those who did not develop a complication. Preoperative REM sleep duration may represent a risk factor for surgical complications; however additional research is necessary to confirm this relationship., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Pre-operative administration of combined oral antibiotic agents and mechanical bowel preparation has been demonstrated to improve post-operative outcomes after elective colectomy, however, many patients do not receive combined preparation. Patient and procedural determinants of combined preparation receipt remain understudied. Patients and Methods: All patients undergoing elective colectomy within the 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use File and Targeted Colectomy datasets were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with receipt of combined preparation. Results: A total of 21,889 patients were included, of whom 13,848 (63.2%) received combined preparation pre-operatively. Patients who received combined preparation tended to be younger, male, of white race, and of non-Hispanic ethnicity (all p < 0.05). After multivariable adjustment, male gender, body mass index (BMI) 30-39 kg/m 2 , independent functional status, and laparoscopic and robotic surgical approaches were associated with receipt of combined preparation (all p < 0.05), whereas Asian race, hypertension, disseminated cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease were associated with omission of combined preparation (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with risk factors for infectious complications-including a poor functional status, comorbid conditions, and undergoing an open procedure-are less likely to receive combined preparation before elective colectomy. Similarly, female and Asian patients are less likely to receive combined preparation, emphasizing the need for equitable administration of combined preparation.

Background: The proliferation of wearable technology presents a novel opportunity for perioperative activity monitoring; however, the association between perioperative activity level and readmission remains underexplored. This study sought to determine whether physical activity data captured by wearable technology before and after colorectal surgery can be used to predict 30-day readmission., Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study of adults undergoing elective major colorectal surgery (January 2018 to February 2019) at a single institution, participants wore an activity monitor 30 days before and after surgery. The primary outcome was return to baseline percentage, defined as step count on the day before discharge as a percentage of mean preoperative daily step count, among readmitted and non-readmitted patients., Results: 94 patients had sufficient data available for analysis, of which 16 patients (17.0%) were readmitted within 30 days following discharge. Readmitted patients achieved a lower return to baseline percentage compared to patients who were not readmitted (median 15.1% vs. 31.8%; P = 0.004). On multivariable analysis adjusting for readmission risk and hospital length of stay, an absolute increase of 10% in return to baseline percentage was associated with a 40% decreased risk of 30-day readmission (odds ratio 0.60; P = 0.02). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve identified 28.9% as an optimal return to baseline percent threshold for predicting readmission., Conclusions: Achieving a higher percentage of an individual's preoperative baseline activity level on the day prior to discharge after major colorectal surgery is associated with decreased risk of 30-day hospital readmission., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Many residency programs struggle to meet the ACGME requirement for resident participation in quality improvement initiatives., Study Design: As part of an institutional quality improvement effort, trainees from the Departments of Surgery and Anesthesiology at a single academic medical center were teamed with institutional content experts in 7 key risk factor areas within preoperative patient optimization. A systematic review of each subject matter area was performed using the MEDLINE database. Institutional recommendations for the screening and management of each risk factor were developed and approved using modified Delphi consensus methodology. Upon project completion, an electronic survey was administered to all individuals who participated in the process to assess the perceived value of participation., Results: Fifty-one perioperative stakeholders participated in recommendation development: 26 trainees and 25 content experts. Residents led 6 out of 7 groups specific to a subject area within preoperative optimization. A total of 4,649 abstracts were identified, of which 456 full-text articles were selected for inclusion in recommendation development. Seventeen out of 26 (65.4%) trainees completed the survey. The vast majority of trainees reported increased understanding of their preoperative optimization subject area (15/17 [88.2%]) as well as the Delphi consensus method (14/17 [82.4%]) after participation in the project. Fourteen out of 17 (82.4%) trainees stated that they would participate in a similar quality improvement initiative again., Conclusions: We demonstrate a novel way to involve trainees in an institutional quality initiative that served to educate trainees in quality improvement, the systematic review process, Delphi methodology, and preoperative optimization. This study provides a framework that other residency programs can use to engage residents in institutional quality improvement efforts., (Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fecal management systems have become ubiquitous in hospitalized patients with fecal incontinence or severe diarrhea, especially in the setting of perianal wounds. Although fecal management system use has been shown to be safe and effective in initial series, case reports of rectal ulceration and severe bleeding have been reported, with a relative paucity of clinical safety data in the literature., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of rectal complications attributable to fecal management systems, as well as to characterize possible risk factors and appropriate management strategies for such complications., Design: This was a retrospective cohort study., Settings: The study was conducted at a large academic medical center., Patients: All medical and surgical patients who underwent fecal management system placement from December 2014 to March 2017 were included., Main Outcome Measures: We measured any rectal complication associated with fecal management system use, defined as any rectal injury identified after fecal management system use confirmed by lower endoscopy., Results: A total of 629 patients were captured, with a median duration of fecal management system use of 4 days. Overall, 8 patients (1.3%) experienced a rectal injury associated with fecal management system use. All of the patients who experienced a rectal complication had severe underlying comorbidities, including 2 patients on dialysis, 1 patient with cirrhosis, and 3 patients with a recent history of emergent cardiac surgery. In 3 patients the bleeding resolved spontaneously, whereas the remaining 5 patients required intervention: transanal suture ligation (n = 2), endoscopic clip placement (n = 1), rectal packing (n = 1), and proctectomy in 1 patient with a history of pelvic radiotherapy., Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective design and single institution., Conclusions: This is the largest study to date evaluating rectal complications from fecal management system use. Although rectal injury rates are low, they can lead to serious morbidity. Advanced age, severe comorbidities, pelvic radiotherapy, and anticoagulation status or coagulopathy are important factors to consider before fecal management system placement. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B698., Incidencia Y Caracterizacin De Las Complicaciones Rectales De Los Sistemas De Manejo Fecal: ANTECEDENTES:Los sistemas de manejo fecal se han vuelto omnipresentes en pacientes hospitalizados con incontinencia fecal o diarrea severa, especialmente en el contexto de heridas perianales. Aunque se ha demostrado que el uso del sistema de tratamiento fecal es seguro y eficaz en la serie inicial, se han notificado casos de ulceración rectal y hemorragia grave, con una relativa escasez de datos de seguridad clínica en la literatura.OBJETIVO:Determinar la tasa de complicaciones rectales atribuibles a los sistemas de manejo fecal. Caracterizar los posibles factores de riesgo y las estrategias de manejo adecuadas para tales complicaciones.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro médico académico de mayor volumen.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes médicos y quirúrgicos que se sometieron a la colocación del sistema de manejo fecal desde diciembre de 2014 hasta marzo de 2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Cualquier complicación rectal asociada con el uso del sistema de manejo fecal, definida como cualquier lesión rectal identificada después del uso del sistema de manejo fecal confirmada por endoscopia baja.RESULTADOS:Se identificaron un total de 629 pacientes, con una duración media del uso del sistema de manejo fecal de 4,0 días. En general, 8 (1,3%) pacientes desarrollaron una lesión rectal asociada con el uso del sistema de manejo fecal. Todos los pacientes que mostraron una complicación rectal tenían comorbilidades subyacentes graves, incluidos dos pacientes en diálisis, un paciente con cirrosis y tres pacientes con antecedentes recientes de cirugía cardíaca emergente. En tres pacientes el sangrado se resolvió espontáneamente, mientras que los cinco pacientes restantes requirieron intervención: ligadura de sutura transanal (2), colocación de clip endoscópico (1), taponamiento rectal (1) y proctectomía en un paciente con antecedentes de radioterapia pélvica.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, institución única.CONCLUSIONES:Este es el estudio más grande hasta la fecha que evalúa las complicaciones rectales del uso del sistema de manejo fecal. Si bien las tasas de lesión rectal son bajas, pueden provocar una morbilidad grave. La edad avanzada, las comorbilidades graves, la radioterapia pélvica y el estado de anticoagulación o coagulopatía son factores importantes a considerar antes de la colocación del sistema de manejo fecal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B698., (Copyright © The ASCRS 2021.)

Background: Previous studies have focused on the development and evaluation of care bundles to reduce the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) throughout the perioperative period. A focused examination of the technical/surgical aspects of SSI reduction during CRS has not been conducted. This study aimed to develop an expert consensus on intraoperative technical/surgical aspects of SSI prevention by the surgical team during colorectal surgery (CRS)., Study Design: In a modified Delphi process, a panel of 15 colorectal surgeons developed a consensus on intraoperative technical/surgical aspects of SSI prevention undertaken by surgical personnel during CRS using information from a targeted literature review and expert opinion. Consensus was developed with up to three rounds per topic, with a prespecified threshold of ≥70% agreement., Results: In 3 Delphi rounds, the 15 panelists achieved consensus on 16 evidence-based statements. The consensus panel supported the use of wound protectors/retractors, sterile incision closure tray, preclosure glove change, and antimicrobial sutures in reducing SSI along with wound irrigation with aqueous iodine and closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy in high-risk, contaminated wounds., Conclusions: Using a modified Delphi method, consensus has been achieved on a tailored set of recommendations on technical/surgical aspects that should be considered by surgical personnel during CRS to reduce the risk of SSI, particularly in areas where the evidence base is controversial or lacking. This document forms the basis for ongoing evidence for the topics discussed in this article or new topics based on newly emerging technologies in CRS., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Surgeons.)

Background: Telemedicine has been rapidly adopted in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited work surrounding demographic and socioeconomic disparities that may exist in telemedicine utilization. This study aimed to examine demographic and socioeconomic differences in surgical patient telemedicine usage during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: Department of Surgery outpatients seen from July 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020 were stratified into three visit groups: pre-COVID-19 in-person, COVID-19 in-person, or COVID-19 telemedicine. Generalized linear models were used to examine associations of sex, race/ethnicity, Distressed Communities Index (DCI) scores, MyChart activation, and insurance status with telemedicine usage during the COVID-19 pandemic., Results: 14,792 patients (median age 60, female [57.0%], non-Hispanic White [76.4%]) contributed to 21,980 visits. Compared to visits before the pandemic, telemedicine visits during COVID-19 were more likely to be with patients from the least socioeconomically distressed communities (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08,1.58; P = 0.005), with an activated MyChart (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17-1.64; P < .001), and with non-government or commercial insurance (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.84-2.94; P < .001). Adjusted comparison of telemedicine visits to in person visits during COVID-19 revealed telemedicine users were more likely to be female (OR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.10-1.73; P = 0.005) and pay with non-government or commercial insurance (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.85-4.16; P < .001)., Conclusions: During the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was more likely utilized by female patients and those without government or commercial insurance compared to patients who used in-person visits. Interventions using telemedicine to improve health care access might consider such differences in utilization., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Management of the acute anastomotic leak is complex and patient-specific. Clinically stable patients often benefit from a nonoperative approach utilizing antibiotics with or without percutaneous drainage. Clinically unstable patients or nonresponders to conservative management require operative intervention. Surgical management is dictated by the degree of contamination and inflammation but includes drainage with proximal diversion, anastomotic resection with end-stoma creation, or reanastomosis with proximal diversion. Newer therapies, including colorectal stenting, vacuum-assisted rectal drainage, and endoscopic clipping, have also been described., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at elevated risk of secondary malignancies (SM). Enhanced screening for SM is recommended, but compliance is poor. We hypothesized that CCS with adult-onset SM (colorectal cancer [CRC], melanoma, or breast cancer [BC]) would present with more advanced disease and have decreased overall survival (OS)., Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried for patients diagnosed with cancer at age less than or equal to 18 also diagnosed with adult-onset CRC, melanoma, or BC. A cohort without a history of prior malignancy was likewise identified. Tumor features and clinical outcomes were compared., Results: CCS with a SM (n = 224) were compared with patients without a childhood cancer history (n = 1,392,670). CCS were diagnosed younger (BC = 37.6 vs. 61.3, p < 0.01, CRC = 35.0 vs. 67.1, p < 0.01, melanoma = 29.6 vs. 61.3 years old, p < 0.01). CCS with BC were more likely to have Stage III or IV disease (25.2% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.01). Hormone-receptor expression also differed; CCS were less likely to develop Luminal A-type tumors (48.6% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.01). After age-adjustment, CCS had worse OS (Hazard ratio: CRC = 2.449, p < 0.01, melanoma = 6.503, p < 0.01, BC = 3.383, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: CCS were younger when diagnosed with a SM. After age-adjustment, OS was diminished. Heightened surveillance may be necessary for CCS diagnosed with SM., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: As the opioid epidemic escalates, preoperative opioid use has become increasingly common. Recent studies associated preoperative opioid use with postoperative morbidity. However, limited study of its impact on patients within enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) exists. We assessed the impact of preoperative opioid use on postoperative complications among colorectal surgery patients within an ERP, hypothesizing that opioid-exposed patients would be at increased risk of complications., Methods: Elective colorectal cases from August 2013 to June 2017 were reviewed in a retrospective cohort study comparing preoperative opioid-exposed patients to opioid-naïve patients. Postoperative complications were defined as a composite of complications captured by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Logistic regression identified risk factors for postoperative complications., Results: 707 patients were identified, including 232 (32.8%) opioid-exposed patients. Opioid-exposed patients were younger (57.9 vs 61.9 years; p < 0.01) and more likely to smoke (27.6 vs 17.1%; p < 0.01). Laparoscopic procedures were less common among opioid-exposed patients (44.8 vs 58.1%; p < 0.01). Median morphine equivalents received were higher in opioid-exposed patients (65.0 vs 20.1 mg; p < 0.01), but compliance to ERP elements was otherwise equivalent. Postoperative complications were higher among opioid-exposed patients (28.5 vs 15.0%; p < 0.01), as was median length of stay (4.0 vs 3.0 days; p < 0.01). Logistic regression identified multiple patient- and procedure-related factors independently associated with postoperative complications, including preoperative opioid use (p = 0.001)., Conclusion: Preoperative opioid use is associated with increased risk of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery patients within an ERP. These results highlight the negative impact of opioid use, suggesting an opportunity to further reduce the risk of surgical complications through ERP expansion to include preoperative mitigation strategies for opioid-exposed patients.

Background: Fever is a common response to both infectious and non-infectious physiologic insults in the critically ill, and in certain populations it appears to be protective. Fever is particularly common in trauma patients, and even more so in those with infections. The relationship between fever, trauma status, and mortality in patients with an infection is unclear. Patients and Methods: A review of a prospectively maintained institutional database over a 17-year period was performed. Surgical and trauma intensive care unit (ICU) patients with a nosocomial infection were extracted to compare in-hospital mortality among trauma and non-trauma patients with and without fever. Univariable analyses compared patient and infection characteristics between trauma and non-trauma patients. A multivariable logistic regression model was created to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality, with a focus on fever and trauma status. Results: Nine hundred forty-one trauma patients and 1,449 non-trauma patients with ICU-acquired infections were identified. Trauma patients were younger (48 vs. 59, p < 0.001), more likely to be male (73% vs. 56%, p < 0.001), more likely to require blood transfusion (74% vs. 47%, p < 0.001), had lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores (18 vs. 19, p = 0.02), and had lower rates of comorbidities. Trauma patients were more likely to develop a fever (72% vs. 43%, p < 0.001) and had lower in-hospital mortality (9.6% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, non-trauma patients with fever had a lower odds of mortality compared with non-trauma patients without fever (odds ratio [OR] 0.63, p = 0.004). Trauma patients with fever had the lowest odds ratio for mortality when compared to non-trauma patients without fever (OR 0.25, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this large cohort of trauma and surgical ICU patients with ICU-acquired infections, fever was associated with a lower odds of mortality in both trauma and non-trauma patients. Further investigation is needed to determine the mechanisms behind the interplay between trauma status, fever, and mortality.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The faculty received reimbursement for travel expenses attending the meeting. No honorarium was provided. T. J. Gan: Honoraria from Acacia, Edwards, Masimo, Medtronic, Merck and Mallinckrodt. S. Bergese: Acacia (Funding for Clinical Trial to Ohio State University). F. Chung has received research support from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, University Health Network Foundation, Acacia Pharma, Medtronics grants to institution outside of the submitted work, Up-to-date royalties, STOP-Bang proprietary to University Health Network. Speaker honorarium from Baxter Pharma. P. Diemunsch: Ambu: Member of an advisors panel on airway management, Fisher & Paykel: Research Grants, paid conferences, French Government: Expert at the Court of Appeal, Acacia Pharma: Research Grants, MSD: Member of an advisory panel on ERAS. A. S. Habib: Funded Research: Pacira Biosciences, Avanos Medical Inc., Advisory Board: Takeda. A. L. Kovac: Merck (speaker’s bureau), Helsinn (speaker’s bureau), Mundipharma (speaker’s bureau), Acacia (speaker’s bureau). T. A. Meyer: Acacia, Neumentum. R. D. Urman: Merck (research funding); Medtronic (consulting fees and research funding); Takeda (consulting fees); Acacia (consulting fees and research funding); Posimir (consulting fees). S. Ayad: Pacira, Medtronic and Acacia. K. Candiotti: Research support-Acacia, Pfizer, Takeda; Consulting-Acacia, Pfizer, Takeda. T. L. Hedrick: MedEdicus. P. Kranke acted as investigator in phase III trials on amisulpride during the last 3 years. He gave invited lectures for FreseniusKabi (propofol), Grünenthal, CSL-Behring, TevaRatiopharm. H. S. Minkowitz: Acacia, AcelRX, Adynxx, Concentric, Durect, Heron, Merck, Mallinckrodt, Innocoll, Pacira, Neumentum, Westward, Trevena, Takeda. J. Morton: Medtronic, Olympus, Novo Nordisk.

Background: Enhanced Recovery (ER) is a change management framework in which a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders utilizes evidence-based medicine to protocolize all aspects of a surgical care to allow more rapid return of function. While service-specific reports of ER adoption are common, institutional-wide adoption is complex, and reports of institution-wide ER adoption are lacking in the United States. We hypothesized that ER principles were generalizable across an institution and could be implemented across a multitude of surgical disciplines with improvements in length of stay, opioid consumption, and cost of care., Methods: Following the establishment of a formal institutional ER program, ER was adopted in 9 distinct surgical subspecialties over 5 years at an academic medical center. We compared length of stay, opioid consumption, and total cost of care in all surgical subspecialties as a function of time using a segmented regression/interrupted time series statistical model., Results: There were 7774 patients among 9 distinct surgical populations including 2155 patients in the pre-ER cohort and 5619 patients in the post-ER cohort. The introduction of an ER protocol was associated with several significant changes: a reduction in length of stay in 5 of 9 specialties; reduction in opioid consumption in 8 specialties; no change or reduction in maximum patient-reported pain scores; and reduction or no change in hospital costs in all specialties. The ER program was associated with an aggregate increase in profit over the study period., Conclusions: Institution-wide efforts to adopt ER can generate significant improvements in patient care, opioid consumption, hospital capacity, and profitability within a large academic medical center., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article., (Copyright © 2020 International Anesthesia Research Society.)

This consensus statement presents a comprehensive and evidence-based set of guidelines for the care of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in both adult and pediatric populations. The guidelines are established by an international panel of experts under the auspices of the American Society of Enhanced Recovery and Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia based on a comprehensive search and review of literature up to September 2019. The guidelines provide recommendation on identifying high-risk patients, managing baseline PONV risks, choices for prophylaxis, and rescue treatment of PONV as well as recommendations for the institutional implementation of a PONV protocol. In addition, the current guidelines focus on the evidence for newer drugs (eg, second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 [5-HT3] receptor antagonists, neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonists, and dopamine antagonists), discussion regarding the use of general multimodal PONV prophylaxis, and PONV management as part of enhanced recovery pathways. This set of guidelines have been endorsed by 23 professional societies and organizations from different disciplines (Appendix 1).Guidelines currently available include the 3 iterations of the consensus guideline we previously published, which was last updated 6 years ago; a guideline published by American Society of Health System Pharmacists in 1999; a brief discussion on PONV management as part of a comprehensive postoperative care guidelines; focused guidelines published by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, the Association of Paediatric Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland and the Association of Perianesthesia Nursing; and several guidelines published in other languages.The current guideline was developed to provide perioperative practitioners with a comprehensive and up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on the risk stratification, prevention, and treatment of PONV in both adults and children. The guideline also provides guidance on the management of PONV within enhanced recovery pathways.The previous consensus guideline was published 6 years ago with a literature search updated to October 2011. Several guidelines, which have been published since, are either limited to a specific populations or do not address all aspects of PONV management. The current guideline was developed based on a systematic review of the literature published up through September 2019. This includes recent studies of newer pharmacological agents such as the second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists, a dopamine antagonist, neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonists as well as several novel combination therapies. In addition, it also contains an evidence-based discussion on the management of PONV in enhanced recovery pathways. We have also discussed the implementation of a general multimodal PONV prophylaxis in all at-risk surgical patients based on the consensus of the expert panel.

Background: Though hemorrhoids commonly cause minor gastrointestinal bleeding, major hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion is believed to be rare. We sought to identify the prevalence and risk factors for preoperative transfusion in surgical hemorrhoidectomy patients., Methods: Patients undergoing surgical hemorrhoidectomy at a single institution (2012-2017) were evaluated for preoperative bleeding requiring transfusion. Bivariate analysis compared patients requiring transfusion to those who did not, and multivariable analysis evaluated for independent risk factors for transfusion., Results: Out of 520 patients, 7.3% experienced hemorrhoidal bleeding requiring transfusion, and 80.6% reported bleeding. On multivariable analysis, the use of either an anticoagulant or non-aspirin antiplatelet agent was associated with transfusion (OR 3.08, p = 0.03). Patients requiring transfusion had extensive preoperative workups, including colonoscopy (94.7%), flexible sigmoidoscopy (7.89%), upper endoscopy (50%) and capsule endoscopy (26.3%)., Conclusions: Bleeding requiring transfusion is an under-reported complication of hemorrhoids. Increased recognition could lead to expeditious surgical treatment and less costly diagnostic workup., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Electroencephalographic (EEG) monitoring to indicate brain state during anesthesia has become widely available. It remains unclear whether EEG-guided anesthesia influences perioperative outcomes. The sixth Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI-6) brought together an international team of multidisciplinary experts from anesthesiology, biomedical engineering, neurology, and surgery to review the current literature and to develop consensus recommendations on the utility of EEG monitoring during anesthesia. We retrieved a total of 1023 articles addressing the use of EEG monitoring during anesthesia and conducted meta-analyses from 15 trials to determine the effect of EEG-guided anesthesia on the rate of unintentional awareness, postoperative delirium, neurocognitive disorder, and long-term mortality after surgery. After considering current evidence, the working group recommends that EEG monitoring should be considered as part of the vital organ monitors to guide anesthetic management. In addition, we encourage anesthesiologists to be knowledgeable in basic EEG interpretation, such as raw waveform, spectrogram, and processed indices, when using these devices. Current evidence suggests that EEG-guided anesthesia reduces the rate of awareness during total intravenous anesthesia and has similar efficacy in preventing awareness as compared with end-tidal anesthetic gas monitoring. There is, however, insufficient evidence to recommend the use of EEG monitoring for preventing postoperative delirium, neurocognitive disorder, or postoperative mortality.

Background: The implementation of protocolized care pathways has resulted in major improvements in surgical outcomes. Additional gains will require focused efforts to alter preexisting risk. Prehabilitation programs provide a promising avenue for risk reduction., Objective: This study used wearable technology to monitor activity levels before colorectal surgery to evaluate the impact of preoperative activity on postoperative outcomes., Design: This was a prospective nonrandomized observational study., Settings: The study was conducted at a large academic medical center., Patients: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery from January 2018 to February 1, 2019, were included., Main Outcome Measures: Patients were trained in the usage of wearable activity-tracking devices and instructed to wear the device for 30 days before surgery. Patients were stratified as active (≥5000 steps per day) and inactive (<5000 steps per day) based on preoperative step counts. Univariate analyses compared postoperative outcomes. Multivariable regression models analyzed the impact of preoperative activity on postoperative complications, adjusting for each patient's baseline risk as calculated using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator. Models were rerun without the addition of activity and the predictive ability of the models compared., Results: Ninety-nine patients were included, with 40 (40.4%) classified as active. Active patients experienced fewer overall complications (11/40 (27.5%) vs 33/59 (55.9%); p = 0.005) and serious complications (2/40 (5%) vs 12/59 (20.3%); p = 0.032). Increased preoperative activity was associated with a decreased risk of any postoperative complication (OR = 0.386; p = 0.0440) on multivariable analysis. The predictive ability of the models for complications and serious complications was improved with the addition of physical activity., Limitations: The study was limited by its small sample size and single institution., Conclusions: There is significant room for improvement in baseline preoperative activity levels of patients undergoing colorectal surgery, and poor activity is associated with increased postoperative complications. These data will serve as the basis for an interventional trial investigating whether wearable devices help improve surgical outcomes through a monitored preoperative exercise program. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B145. TECNOLOGÍA PORTÁTIL EN EL PERÍODO PERIOPERATORIO: PREDICCIÓN DEL RIESGO DE COMPLICACIONES POSTOPERATORIAS EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL ELECTIVA: La implementación de vías de atención protocolizadas ha dado lugar a importantes mejoras en los resultados quirúrgicos. Para obtener más beneficios será necesario realizar esfuerzos concentrados para modificar el riesgo preexistente. Los programas de rehabilitación proporcionan una vía prometedora para la reducción del riesgo.Este estudio utilizó tecnología portátil para monitorear los niveles de actividad antes de la cirugía colorrectal para evaluar el impacto de la actividad preoperatoria en los resultados postoperatorios.Estudio observacional prospectivo no aleatorizado.Gran centro médico académico.Pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva desde enero de 2018 hasta el 1 de febrero de 2019.Los pacientes fueron entrenados en el uso de dispositivos portátiles para el seguimiento de la actividad y se les indicó usar el dispositivo durante 30 días antes de la cirugía. Los pacientes fueron estratificados como activos (> 5000 pasos / día) e inactivos (<5000 pasos / día) en base a los recuentos de pasos preoperatorios. Los análisis univariados compararon los resultados postoperatorios. Los modelos de regresión multivariable analizaron el impacto de la actividad preoperatoria en las complicaciones postoperatorias, ajustando el riesgo de referencia de cada paciente según lo calculado utilizando la Calculadora de riesgo quirúrgico del Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos. Los modelos se volvieron a ejecutar sin agregar actividad, y se comparó la capacidad de predicción de los modelos.Noventa y nueve pacientes fueron incluidos con 40 (40.4%) clasificados como activos. Los pacientes activos experimentaron menos complicaciones generales [11/40 (27,5%) frente a 33/59 (55,9%); p = 0,005] y complicaciones graves [2/40 (5%) frente a 12/59 (20,3%); p = 0,032]. El aumento de la actividad preoperatoria se asoció con una disminución del riesgo de cualquier complicación postoperatoria (OR 0.386, p = 0.0440) en el análisis multivariable. La capacidad predictiva de los modelos para complicaciones y complicaciones graves mejoró con la adición de actividad física.Tamaño de muestra pequeño, una sola institución.Existe un margen significativo para mejorar los niveles basales de actividad preoperatoria de los pacientes de cirugía colorrectal, y la escasa actividad se asocia con mayores complicaciones postoperatorias. Estos datos servirán de base para un ensayo intervencionista que investigue si los dispositivos portátiles ayudan a mejorar los resultados quirúrgicos a través de un programa de ejercicio preoperatorio monitoreado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B145.

Background: The Controlled Substance Act was enacted in efforts to reduce the abuse and misuse of opioid pain relievers. However, the effects of this regulation on the prescribing patterns of providers has yet to be realized., Objective: We sought to identify the changes in opioid-prescribing patterns of an elective colorectal surgical practice as a result of this legislative change., Design: This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Patients were intentionally grouped into group A (January 1, 2012 to October 5, 2014) and group B (October 6, 2014 to December 31, 2016) to capture the period surrounding the new legislation., Settings: We evaluated patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery at a single academic center over a 5-year period., Patients: There were 443 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery between 2012 and 2016., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was total milligram morphine equivalent of pain medication prescribed at discharge. Secondary outcomes included total number of pills prescribed, total milligram morphine equivalent of pain medication at subsequent prescriptions, and numeric postoperative pain scores., Results: Patients in group B were found to have a greater mean total milligram morphine equivalent prescribed at discharge (719 (SD 593) vs 660 (SD 548), p = 0.03), mean total quantity of pills prescribed at discharge (98 (SD 106) vs 87 (SD 63), p = 0.05), and mean total quantity of pills prescribed as subsequent prescriptions (77 (SD 117) vs 68 (SD 83), p = 0.05) compared with group A. On multivariable analysis, group B was a significant predictor of greater total milligram morphine equivalents prescribed at discharge compared with group A (p = 0.01)., Limitations: This study is limited by analysis from a single institution., Conclusions: Efforts to minimize opioid prescriptions after surgery through legislation could result in unintended consequences. Recognition of this result is important to effectively reduce opioid prescriptions after surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B96. UNA CONSECUENCIA NO DESEADA DE UNA NUEVA LEGISLACIÓN DE OPIOIDES: La Ley de Sustancias Controladas se promulgó con el fin de reducir el abuso y el uso indebido de analgésicos opioides. Sin embargo, los efectos de esta regulación en los patrones de prescripción de los proveedores aún no se han realizado.Se intento identificar los cambios en los patrones de prescripción de opioides de una práctica quirúrgica colorrectal electiva como resultado de este cambio legislativo.Este es un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva. Los pacientes fueron agrupados intencionalmente en el Grupo A (1 de enero de 2012 al 5 de octubre de 2014) y el Grupo B (6 de octubre de 2014 al 31 de diciembre de 2016) para capturar el período que rodea la nueva legislación.Se evaluaron a los pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva en un solo centro académico durante un período de 5 años.Hubo 443 pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía colorrectal electiva entre 2012-2016.La medida de resultado primaria fue el equivalente de miligramos de morfina total de los analgésicos prescritos al momento del alta. Las medidas de resultado secundarias incluyeron el número total de píldoras prescritas, el equivalente total de miligramos de morfina de la medicación para el dolor en las prescripciones posteriores y las puntuaciones numéricas de dolor postoperatorio.Se encontró que los pacientes en el Grupo B tenían un equivalente de miligramos de morfina total total mayor prescrito al alta (719 [DE 593] v. 660 [DE 548], p = 0.03), cantidad total promedio de píldoras prescritas al alta (98 [SD 106] v. 87 [SD 63], p = 0.05), y la cantidad total promedio de píldoras recetadas como recetas posteriores (77 [SD 117] v. 68 [SD 83], p = 0.05) en comparación con el Grupo A. En análisis multivariable, el Grupo B fue un predictor significativo de mayores equivalentes de morfina en miligramos totales prescritos al alta en comparación con el grupo A (p = 0.01).Este estudio está limitado por el análisis de una sola instituciónLos esfuerzos para minimizar las recetas de opioides después de la cirugía a través de la legislación podrían tener consecuencias no deseadas. El reconocimiento de este resultado es importante para reducir eficazmente las recetas de opioides después de la cirugía. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B96.

Background: Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy negatively impacts long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Colorectal enhanced recovery protocols result in decreased complications and length of stay; however, the impact of enhanced recovery on the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unknown., Objective: This study aimed to identify factors associated with on-time delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery, hypothesizing that implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol would result in more patients receiving on-time chemotherapy., Design: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the rate of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy delivery after colorectal cancer resection before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol., Settings: The study was conducted at a large academic medical center., Patients: All of the patients who underwent nonemergent colorectal cancer resections for curative intent from January 2010 to June 2017, excluding patients who had no indication for adjuvant chemotherapy, had received preoperative systemic chemotherapy, or did not have medical oncology records available were included., Main Outcome Measures: Patients before and enhanced recovery were compared, with the rate of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy delivery as the primary outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy delivery was considered on time if initiated ≤8 weeks postoperatively, and treatment was considered delayed or omitted if initiated >8 weeks postoperatively (delayed) or never received (omitted). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of on-time chemotherapy delivery., Results: A total of 363 patients met inclusion criteria, with 189 patients (52.1%) undergoing surgery after enhanced recovery implementation. Groups differed in laparoscopic approach and median procedure duration, both of which were higher after enhanced recovery. Significantly more patients received on-time chemotherapy after enhanced recovery implementation (p = 0.007). Enhanced recovery was an independent predictor of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.014)., Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective and nonrandomized before-and-after design., Conclusions: Enhanced recovery was associated with receiving on-time adjuvant chemotherapy. As prompt initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in colorectal cancer, future investigation of long-term oncologic outcomes is necessary to evaluate the potential impact of enhanced recovery on survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B21. LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE UN PROTOCOLO DE RECUPERACIÓN ACELERADA SE ASOCIA CON EL INICIO A TIEMPO DE QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN CÁNCER COLORRECTAL:: El inicio tardío de la quimioterapia adyuvante afecta negativamente la supervivencia a largo plazo en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. Los protocolos de recuperación acelerada colorrectales dan lugar a una disminución de las complicaciones y la duración de estancia hospitalaria; sin embargo, el impacto de la recuperación acelerada en el momento de inicio de quimioterapia adyuvante sigue siendo desconocido.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar los factores asociados con la administración a tiempo de la quimioterapia adyuvante después de la cirugía de cáncer colorrectal, con la hipótesis de que la implementación de un protocolo de recuperación acelerada daría lugar a que más pacientes reciban quimioterapia a tiempo.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que compara la tasa de administración de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo después de la resección del cáncer colorrectal antes y después de la implementación de un protocolo de recuperación acelerada.Centro médico académico grande.Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a resecciones de cáncer colorrectal no emergentes con intención curativa desde enero de 2010 hasta junio de 2017, excluyendo a los pacientes que no tenían indicación de quimioterapia adyuvante, que recibieron quimioterapia sistémica preoperatoria o no tenían registros médicos de oncología disponibles.Los pacientes se compararon antes y después de la implementación de la recuperación acelerada, con la tasa de administración de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo como el resultado primario. La administración de quimioterapia adyuvante se consideró a tiempo si se inició ≤8 semanas después de la operación, y el tratamiento se consideró retrasado / omitido si se inició> 8 semanas después de la operación (retrasado) o nunca fue recibido (omitido). La regresión logística multivariable identificó predictores de administración de quimioterapia a tiempo.363 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión, con 189 (52.1%) pacientes sometidos a cirugía después de la implementación de recuperación acelerada. Los grupos difirieron en el abordaje laparoscópico y la duración media del procedimiento; ambos factores fueron mayores después de la recuperación acelerada. Significativamente más pacientes recibieron quimioterapia a tiempo después de la implementación de recuperación acelerada (p = 0.007). La recuperación acelerada fue un factor predictivo independiente de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo (p = 0.014).Diseño retrospectivo, tipo ¨antes y después¨ no aleatorizado.La recuperación acelerada se asoció con la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo. Debido a que el inicio rápido de la quimioterapia adyuvante mejora la supervivencia en el cáncer colorrectal, en el futuro será necesario investigar los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo para evaluar el impacto potencial de la recuperación acelerada en la supervivencia. Vea el Resumen en Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B21.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) continues to be a common and costly complication after surgery. The current commonly used definitions of SSI were devised more than two decades ago and do not take in to account more modern technology that could be used to make diagnosis more consistent and precise. Patient-generated health data (PGHD), including digital imaging, may be able to fulfill this objective. Methods: The published literature was examined to determine the current state of development in terms of using digital imaging as an aide to diagnose SSI. This information was used to devise possible methodology that could be used to integrate digital images to more objectively define SSI, as well as using these data for both surveillance activities and clinical management. Results: Digital imaging is a highly promising means to help define and diagnose SSI, particularly in remote settings. Multiple groups continue to actively study these emerging technologies, however, present methods remain based generally on subjective rather than objective observations. Although current images may be useful on a case-by-case basis, similar to physical examination information, integrating imaging in the definition of SSI to allow more automated diagnosis in the future will require complex image analysis combined with other available quantified data. Conclusions: Digital imaging technology, once adequately evolved, should become a cornerstone of the criteria for both the clinical and surveillance definitions of SSI.

Background: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP Virginia Surgical Quality Collaborative (VSQC) exists to improve surgical outcomes through multi-institutional collaboration. Enhanced recovery (ER) protocols improve morbidity and reduce length of stay (LOS) after elective surgery. We hypothesized implementation of ER through VSQC would reduce postoperative complications and LOS in patients undergoing elective colectomy. Our objective was to evaluate whether standardization of care based on evidenced-based practices in healthcare settings across multiple institutions improved outcomes., Study Design: In 2013, VSQC incrementally implemented ER for patients undergoing elective colectomy at participating institutions. Institutions shared protocols, order sets, educational materials, and met semi-annually to discuss progress. Risk-adjusted ACS NSQIP data (January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2016) was queried in 4 participating hospitals. The association of ER with surgical outcomes was evaluated with a before and after ER implementation analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling with a priori selection of clinically relevant variables., Results: There were 2,438 consecutive colectomies included in analysis (1,035 pre-ER/1,403 post-ER). In the post-ER implementation patient cohort, relatively more patients were treated laparoscopically (68%) compared with the pre-ER cohort (52%) (p < 0.001). Median LOS decreased from 5 to 4 days after ER implementation in patients undergoing open colectomy (p < 0.001), although total complications were similar in frequency (23% vs 22%). Laparoscopic patients had a reduced LOS (4 vs 3 days; p < 0.001), 30-day readmissions (12% vs 8%; p = 0.01), and total complications (16% vs 9%; p < 0.001) after ER implementation. In multivariable models, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, hypertension, smoking, ER, and laparoscopy were independently associated with complication risk., Conclusions: Implementation of ER across VSQC was associated with reduction in LOS and complications in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute diverticulitis (AD) presents a unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for general surgeons. This collaborative project between EAES and SAGES aimed to summarize recent evidence and draw statements of recommendation to guide our members on comprehensive AD management., Methods: Systematic reviews of the literature were conducted across six AD topics by an international steering group including experts from both societies. Topics encompassed the epidemiology, diagnosis, management of non-complicated and complicated AD as well as emergency and elective operative AD management. Consensus statements and recommendations were generated, and the quality of the evidence and recommendation strength rated with the GRADE system. Modified Delphi methodology was used to reach consensus among experts prior to surveying the EAES and SAGES membership on the recommendations and likelihood to impact their practice. Results were presented at both EAES and SAGES annual meetings with live re-voting carried out for recommendations with < 70% agreement., Results: A total of 51 consensus statements and 41 recommendations across all six topics were agreed upon by the experts and submitted for members' online voting. Based on 1004 complete surveys and over 300 live votes at the SAGES and EAES Diverticulitis Consensus Conference (DCC), consensus was achieved for 97.6% (40/41) of recommendations with 92% (38/41) agreement on the likelihood that these recommendations would change practice if not already applied. Areas of persistent disagreement included the selective use of imaging to guide AD diagnosis, recommendations against antibiotics in non-complicated AD, and routine colonic evaluation after resolution of non-complicated diverticulitis., Conclusion: This joint EAES and SAGES consensus conference updates clinicians on the current evidence and provides a set of recommendations that can guide clinical AD management practice.

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer and possibly the formation of precancerous, colorectal polyps . Bariatric surgery is very effective for long-term weight loss; however, it is not known whether bariatric surgery decreases the risk of subsequent colonic neoplasia. We hypothesized that bariatric surgery would decrease the risk of developing colorectal lesions (new cancer and precancerous polyps)., Methods: We reviewed all patients (n = 3,676) who underwent bariatric surgery (gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, or gastric banding) at the University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA) 1985-2015. Obese, nonoperative patients (n = 46,873) from an institutional data repository were included as controls. Cases and controls were propensity score matched 1:1 by demographics, comorbidities, body mass index, and socioeconomic factors. The matched cohort was compared by univariate analysis and conditional logistic regression., Results: A total of 4,462 patients (2,231 per group) with a median follow-up of 7.8 years were well-matched with no statistically significant baseline differences in initial body mass index (48 vs 49 kg/m 2 ), sex, and age in addition to other comorbidities (all P > .05). The operative cohort had more weight loss (55.5% vs -1.4% decrease in excess body mass index, P < .0001). The operative cohort developed fewer colorectal lesions (2.4% vs 4.8%, P < .0001). We observed no differences in polyp characteristics or staging for patients who developed cancer (all P > .05). After risk adjustment, bariatric surgery was independently associated with a decrease in new colorectal lesions (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.91, P = .016)., Conclusion: Bariatric surgery was associated with lesser, risk-adjusted incidence of new colorectal lesions in this large population of propensity matched patients undergoing bariatric surgery compared with a control group not undergoing bariatric surgery. These results suggest the benefits of bariatric surgery may extend beyond weight loss and mitigation of comorbidities., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Enhanced recovery pathways have quickly become part of the standard of care for patients undergoing elective surgery, especially in North America and Europe. One of the central tenets of this multidisciplinary approach is the use of multimodal analgesia with opioid-sparing and even opioid-free anesthesia and analgesia. However, the current state is a historically high use of opioids for both appropriate and inappropriate reasons, and patients with chronic opioid use before their surgery represent a common, often difficult-to-manage population for the enhanced recovery providers and health care team at large. Furthermore, limited evidence and few proven successful protocols exist to guide providers caring for these at-risk patients throughout their elective surgical experience. Therefore, the fourth Perioperative Quality Initiative brought together an international team of multidisciplinary experts, including anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, surgeons, pain specialists, neurologists, nurses, and other experts with the objective of providing consensus recommendations. Specifically, the goal of this consensus document is to minimize opioid-related complications by providing expert-based consensus recommendations that reflect the strength of the medical evidence regarding: (1) the definition, categorization, and risk stratification of patients receiving opioids before surgery; (2) optimal perioperative treatment strategies for patients receiving preoperative opioids; and (3) optimal discharge and continuity of care management practices for patients receiving opioids preoperatively. The overarching theme of this document is to provide health care providers with guidance to reduce potentially avoidable opioid-related complications including opioid dependence (both physical and behavioral), disability, and death. Enhanced recovery programs attempt to incorporate best practices into pathways of care. By presenting the available evidence for perioperative management of patients on opioids, this consensus panel hopes to encourage further development of pathways specific to this high-risk group to mitigate the often unintentional iatrogenic and untoward effects of opioids and to improve perioperative outcomes.

Introduction and Hypothesis: Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) are evidenced-based interventions designed to standardize perioperative care and expedite recovery to baseline functional status after surgery. There remains a paucity of data addressing the effect of ERPs on pelvic reconstructive surgery patients., Methods: An ERP was implemented at our institution including: patient counseling, carbohydrate loading, avoidance of opioids, goal-directed fluid resuscitation, immediate postoperative feeding and early ambulation. Patients undergoing elective pelvic reconstructive surgery before and after implementation of the ERP were identified in this cohort study., Results: One hundred eighteen patients underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery within the ERP compared with 76 historic controls. Reductions were seen in length of hospital stay (29.9 vs. 27.9 h, p = 0.04), total morphine equivalents (37.4 vs. 19.4 mg, p < 0.01) and total intravenous fluids administered (2.7 l vs. 1.5 l, p < 0.0001). Hospital discharges before noon doubled (32.9 vs. 60.2%, p < 0.01). More patients in the ERP group ambulated on the day of surgery (17.1 vs. 73.7%, p < 0.01) and ambulated at least two times the day following surgery (34.2 vs. 72.9%, p < 0.01). No differences were seen in average pain scores (highest pain score 7.39 vs. 7.37, p = 0.95), hospital readmissions (3.9 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.84), or postoperative complications (6.58 vs. 8.47%, p = 0.79). Patient satisfaction significantly improved. ERP was not associated with an increase in 30-day total hospital costs., Conclusions: Implementation of ERP for pelvic reconstructive surgery patients was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay, improved patient satisfaction, and decreased administration of intravenous fluids and opioids without an increase in complications, readmissions, or hospital costs.

Background: Identifying factors that impact progression of surgery trainees into academic versus non-academic practices may permit tailoring residency experiences to promote academic careers in institutions charged with the training of future surgeon scientists. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with progression of surgery trainees into academic versus non-academic practice., Methods: A survey was distributed to 135 surgeons graduating from the University of Virginia residency program from 1964-2016, a single academic institution. Questions addressed practice type, research productivity, work/life balance, mentorship, and overall sentiment toward research and academic surgery. A 5-point Likert scale measured career satisfaction and influence of factors in practice setting choice., Results: Of the 135 surveys that were electronically distributed, 69 participants responded (response rate: 51%). Of the 54 with known current practice types, 34 (63%) were academic and 20 (37%) non-academic. Academic surgeons reported more publications by the conclusion of surgery training (56% vs 25% with >10 publications, P = .02). More academic surgeons reported >$100,000 in student debt at graduation (44% vs 25%, P < .05). Factors encouraging an academic career were similar for both types of surgeons, including involvement in education of trainees and access to mentorship. Both groups were discouraged from an academic practice by requirements of grant-writing and funding responsibilities. Surgeons in academic practice were more likely to recommend surgery as a career to a current medical student (100% vs 70%, P = .001)., Conclusion: This knowledge may help to tailor training experiences to promote academic careers. By supporting funding mechanisms and grant-writing programs, while encouraging mentorship and productive research experiences, current surgical trainees may be more enthusiastic about a career in academic practice., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute kidney injury is a prevalent complication after abdominal surgery. With increasing adoption of enhanced recovery protocols, concern exists for concomitant increase in acute kidney injury., Objective: This study evaluated effects of enhanced recovery on acute kidney injury through identification of risk factors., Design: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing acute kidney injury rates before and after implementation of enhanced recovery protocol., Settings: The study was conducted at a large academic medical center., Patients: All of the patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery between 2010 and 2016, excluding patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease, were included., Main Outcome Measures: Patients before and after enhanced recovery implementation were compared, with rate of acute kidney injury as the primary outcome. Acute kidney injury was defined as a rise in serum creatinine ≥1.5 times baseline within 30 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors for acute kidney injury., Results: A total of 900 cases were identified, including 461 before and 439 after enhanced recovery; 114 cases were complicated by acute kidney injury, including 11.93% of patients before and 13.44% after implementation of enhanced recovery (p = 0.50). Five patients required hemodialysis, with 2 cases after protocol implementation. Multivariable logistic regression identified hypertension, functional status, ureteral stents, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, operative time >200 minutes, and increased intravenous fluid administration on postoperative day 1 as predictors of acute kidney injury. Laparoscopic surgery decreased the risk of acute kidney injury. The enhanced recovery protocol was not independently associated with acute kidney injury., Limitations: The study was limited by its retrospective and nonrandomized before-and-after design., Conclusions: No difference in rates of acute kidney injury was detected before and after implementation of a colorectal enhanced recovery protocol. Independent predictors of acute kidney injury were identified and could be used to alter the protocol in high-risk patients. Future study is needed to determine whether protocol modifications will further decrease rates of acute kidney injury in this population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A568.

Background: Ureteral stents are commonly placed before colorectal resection to assist in identification of ureters and prevent injury. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common cause of morbidity and increased cost following colorectal surgery. Although previously associated with reflex anuria, prophylactic stents have not been found to increase AKI. We sought to determine the impact of ureteral stents on the incidence of AKI following colorectal surgery., Methods: All patients undergoing colon or rectal resection at a single institution between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset. AKI was defined as a rise in serum creatinine to ≥ 1.5 times the preoperative value. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of AKI., Results: 2910 patients underwent colorectal resection. Prophylactic ureteral stents were placed in 129 patients (4.6%). Postoperative AKI occurred in 335 (11.5%) patients during their hospitalization. The stent group demonstrated increased AKI incidence (32.6% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.0001) with bilateral having a higher rate than unilateral stents. Hospital costs were higher in the stent group ($23,629 vs. $16,091; p < 0.0001), and patients with bilateral stents had the highest costs. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of AKI after colorectal surgery including age, procedure duration, and ureteral stent placement., Conclusions: Prophylactic ureteral stents independently increased AKI risk when placed prior to colorectal surgery. These data demonstrate increased morbidity and hospital costs related to usage of stents in colorectal surgery, indicating that placement should be limited to patients with highest potential benefit.

Adequate lymphadenectomy is associated with improved survival in patients who undergo oncologic resection of colorectal cancer and has been identified as a quality metric. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been found to be associated with collection of <12 lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient and operative risk factors for inadequate lymph node retrieval during oncologic colectomy. The 2014 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File data set for oncologic colectomy (n = 9077) was analyzed. Patient- and operation-related factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate regression analyses to determine factors associated with the number of lymph nodes collected. Adequate lymphadenectomy was defined by collection of >12 lymph nodes. Of 9077 patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer who underwent colectomy, a minimum of 12 lymph nodes was harvested in 7897 (87%). Significant factors independently associated with inadequate lymphadenectomy included preoperative chemotherapy, emergent surgery, and T1 tumors (all P < 0.05). A large majority of patients who undergo colectomy for colon cancer have at least 12 lymph nodes collected. Preoperative chemotherapy is a major risk factor for inadequate lymph node retrieval. Recognition of factors associated with inadequate lymphadenectomy may improve colectomy lymph node yield and survival in patients with colon cancer.

Perioperative malnutrition has proven to be challenging to define, diagnose, and treat. Despite these challenges, it is well known that suboptimal nutritional status is a strong independent predictor of poor postoperative outcomes. Although perioperative caregivers consistently express recognition of the importance of nutrition screening and optimization in the perioperative period, implementation of evidence-based perioperative nutrition guidelines and pathways in the United States has been quite limited and needs to be addressed in surgery-focused recommendations. The second Perioperative Quality Initiative brought together a group of international experts with the objective of providing consensus recommendations on this important topic with the goal of (1) developing guidelines for screening of nutritional status to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes due to malnutrition; (2) address optimal methods of providing nutritional support and optimizing nutrition status preoperatively; and (3) identifying when and how to optimize nutrition delivery in the postoperative period. Discussion led to strong recommendations for implementation of routine preoperative nutrition screening to identify patients in need of preoperative nutrition optimization. Postoperatively, nutrition delivery should be restarted immediately after surgery. The key role of oral nutrition supplements, enteral nutrition, and parenteral nutrition (implemented in that order) in most perioperative patients was advocated for with protein delivery being more important than total calorie delivery. Finally, the role of often-inadequate nutrition intake in the posthospital setting was discussed, and the role of postdischarge oral nutrition supplements was emphasized.

The primary driver of length of stay after bowel surgery, particularly colorectal surgery, is the time to return of gastrointestinal (GI) function. Traditionally, delayed GI recovery was thought to be a routine and unavoidable consequence of surgery, but this has been shown to be false in the modern era owing to the proliferation of enhanced recovery protocols. However, impaired GI function is still common after colorectal surgery, and the current literature is ambiguous with regard to the definition of postoperative GI dysfunction (POGD), or what is typically referred to as ileus. This persistent ambiguity has impeded the ability to ascertain the true incidence of the condition and study it properly within a research setting. Furthermore, a rational and standardized approach to prevention and treatment of POGD is needed. The second Perioperative Quality Initiative brought together a group of international experts to review the published literature and provide consensus recommendations on this important topic with the goal to (1) develop a rational definition for POGD that can serve as a framework for clinical and research efforts; (2) critically review the evidence behind current prevention strategies and provide consensus recommendations; and (3) develop rational treatment strategies that take into account the wide spectrum of impaired GI function in the postoperative period.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of health status that come directly from the patient. PROs are an underutilized tool in the perioperative setting. Enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have primarily focused on traditional measures of health care quality such as complications and hospital length of stay. These measures do not capture postdischarge outcomes that are meaningful to patients such as function or freedom from disability. PROs can be used to facilitate shared decisions between patients and providers before surgery and establish benchmark recovery goals after surgery. PROs can also be utilized in quality improvement initiatives and clinical research studies. An expert panel, the Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) workgroup, conducted an extensive literature review to determine best practices for the incorporation of PROs in an ERP. This international group of experienced clinicians from North America and Europe met at Stony Brook, NY, on December 2-3, 2016, to review the evidence supporting the use of PROs in the context of surgical recovery. A modified Delphi method was used to capture the collective expertise of a diverse group to answer clinical questions. During 3 plenary sessions, the POQI PRO subgroup presented clinical questions based on a literature review, presented evidenced-based answers to those questions, and developed recommendations which represented a consensus opinion regarding the use of PROs in the context of an ERP. The POQI workgroup identified key criteria to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for their incorporation in an ERP. The POQI workgroup agreed on the following recommendations: (1) PROMs in the perioperative setting should be collected in the framework of physical, mental, and social domains. (2) These data should be collected preoperatively at baseline, during the immediate postoperative time period, and after hospital discharge. (3) In the immediate postoperative setting, we recommend using the Quality of Recovery-15 score. After discharge at 30 and 90 days, we recommend the use of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2.0, or a tailored use of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. (4) Future study that consistently applies PROMs in an ERP will define the role these measures will have evaluating quality and guiding clinical care. Consensus guidelines regarding the incorporation of PRO measures in an ERP were created by the POQI workgroup. The inclusion of PROMs with traditional measures of health care quality after surgery provides an opportunity to improve clinical care.

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for rectal cancer has increased in recent years. Enhanced recovery (ER) protocols are associated with improved outcomes, such as decreased length of stay (LOS). We examined the impact of MIS and ER protocols on outcomes after rectal resection for neoplasm., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients undergoing elective open (OS) or MIS rectal resection for neoplasm from 2010 to 2015 at a single institution. MIS was defined as any laparoscopic or robotic procedure. An ER protocol was implemented in 8/2013. Regression models were used to estimate outcomes including LOS, 30-day morbidity, readmission, and hospital costs., Results: Among 325 patients, 252 (77.5%) underwent OS; 73 (22.5%) underwent MIS rectal resection. Prior to ER implementation, only 6.1% underwent MIS, compared to 23.1 and 54.4% in the 2 years following ER implementation (p < 0.001). Prior to ER implementation, median LOS was 7 days (n = 181) with 23.8% 30-day morbidity. Following ER implementation, median LOS was 4 days (n = 144); patients receiving OS had median LOS of 5.5 days (n = 82) and 30-day morbidity of 19.5%. ER patients receiving MIS had median LOS of 3 days (n = 62) and 30-day morbidity of 14.5%. Univariate regression demonstrated that MIS patients on ER protocol were more likely to have a shortened LOS (< 6 days) compared to OS patients on non-ER protocol (both p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The combination of MIS and ER protocol is significantly associated with reduced LOS for patients undergoing rectal resection for neoplasm. Further research is needed to determine which patients are best suited to MIS from an oncologic standpoint.

Background: Surgical site infection is a frequent cause of morbidity after colorectal resection and is a quality measure for hospitals and surgeons. In an effort to reduce the risk of postoperative infections, many wounds are left open at the time of surgery for secondary or delayed primary wound closure., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of delayed wound closure on the rate of surgical infections and resource use., Design: This retrospective propensity-matched study compared colorectal surgery patients with wounds left open with a cohort of patients with primary skin closure., Settings: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program Participant Use file for 2014 was queried., Patients: A total of 50,212 patients who underwent elective or emergent colectomy, proctectomy, and stoma creation were included., Main Outcome Measures: Rates of postoperative infections and discharge to medical facilities were measured., Results: Surgical wounds were left open in 2.9% of colorectal cases (n = 1466). Patients with skin left open were broadly higher risk, as evidenced by a significantly higher median estimated probability of 30-day mortality (3.40% vs 0.45%; p < 0.0001). After propensity matching (n = 1382 per group), there were no significant differences between baseline characteristics. Within the matched cohort, there were no differences in the rates of 30-day mortality, deep or organ space infection, or sepsis (all p > 0.05). Resource use was higher for patients with incisions left open, including longer length of stay (11 vs 10 d; p = 0.006) and higher rates of discharge to a facility (34% vs 27%; p < 0.001)., Limitations: This study was limited by its retrospective design and a large data set with a bias toward academic institutions., Conclusions: In a well-matched colorectal cohort, secondary or delayed wound closure eliminates superficial surgical infections, but there was no decrease in deep or organ space infections. In addition, attention should be given to the possibility for increased resource use associated with open surgical incisions. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A560.