Search

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in child and adolescent mental health disorders, with subsequent worsening of patient access to specialist mental health care. Clinicians working in the community were faced with increased demands to diagnose and manage pediatric mental health disorders, without always having the confidence and knowledge to do so. We therefore developed COnnecting Mental-health PAediatric Specialists and community Services (COMPASS)-a collaborative model designed to upskill community clinicians in child and adolescent mental health care and provide them with better access to child and adolescent psychiatry expertise. COMPASS comprises (1) an online Community of Practice (CoP) with fortnightly one-hour sessions covering: anxiety; aggression and challenging behaviours; depression; self-harm and suicidality; eating disorders; and autism spectrum disorder/complex cases and (2) primary and secondary consultations for general practitioners and paediatricians with an experienced child psychiatrist. We aimed to assess the impact of COMPASS on community clinician self-reported confidence in: managing common child and adolescent mental health disorders (Objective 1, primary outcome); navigating the mental health care system (i.e. knowing how services are organised, accessed, and how to refer patients, Objective 2); diagnosing conditions (Objective 3); prescribing psychotropic medications (Objective 4) as well as the impact on, clinician practice and wellbeing (Objective 5) and outcomes of patients referred by COMPASS clinicians to the child psychiatrist (Objective 6)., Methods: We evaluated COMPASS in its first year, with COMPASS running from March to July 2021. Participating clinicians completed pre-post surveys evaluating change in Objectives 1 to 4 above, using study-designed measures. A purposive sample of clinicians was then invited to a semi-structured interview to understand their experience of COMPASS and its impacts on practice and wellbeing (Objective 5). We adopted an inductive approach to the qualitative analysis using the Framework Method. This involved selecting five random transcripts which were double coded and categorized, to generate an initial framework against which all subsequent transcripts were analysed. Themes and subthemes were generated from the data set, by reviewing the matrix and making connections within and between clinicians, codes and categories One child psychiatrist completed a 2-week logbook of the nature and outcomes of primary and secondary consultations (Objective 6)., Findings: 51 (86%) clinicians attended CoP sessions and completed pre-post surveys, with 92% recommending COMPASS to peers. Clinicians reported increased confidence in the pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of all conditions, most notably for management of self-harm. They also reported increased knowledge of how to navigate the mental health system and prescribe medications. Qualitative analysis (n = 27 interviews) found that COMPASS increased clinician wellbeing and reduced feelings of professional isolation and burnout. Over the 2-week snapshot, the child psychiatrist consulted on 22 patients and referred all back to the community clinician., Conclusions: COMPASS is associated with improved clinician confidence to manage child and adolescent mental health concerns, navigate the mental health system, improved clinician wellbeing, and reduced need for ongoing mental health care by specialists., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 D’Abaco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Aim: Children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder and/or intellectual disability often present to emergency departments with behaviours of concern: irritability, aggression and self-injurious behaviour. The objective of this study was to design, implement and evaluate a new model of care to support these patients and their families following presentation to reduce the need for re-presentation., Methods: We designed and evaluated a new model of care for these patients, comprising consultations with a developmental paediatrician and a child psychiatrist, referral to a specialist behavioural service and 6 weeks of care coordination by a clinical nurse consultant. Using a quality improvement framework, iterative improvements were made to the model via a series of plan-do-study-act cycles. Re-presentation rates were compared with a control group of patients who presented with behaviours of concern but were not recruited into the study. Participating families and treating clinicians were surveyed at 2 and 6 weeks post-enrolment to gather qualitative feedback about their experience of the model., Results: A total of 31 families participated in the study. Three- and 6-month re-presentation rates were 48.7% and 36.3% lower than the control group. Qualitative evaluation of the model by both families and clinicians was positive. The model was feasible and acceptable. Families reported feeling heard and understood, and that the intervention was helpful and provided a positive path forwards., Conclusions: The findings suggest that a simple model of care can be successfully implemented and provide meaningful benefits for families of children with behaviours of concern, including reduced crisis-oriented help-seeking., (© 2024 Paediatrics and Child Health Division (The Royal Australasian College of Physicians).)

Background: Unaddressed family adversity has potentially modifiable, negative biopsychosocial impacts across the life course. Little is known about how Australian health and social practitioners identify and respond to family adversity in community and primary health settings., Objective: To describe, in two Australian community health services: (1) the number of adversities experienced by caregivers, (2) practitioner identification of caregivers experiencing adversity, (3) practitioner response to caregivers experiencing adversity, and (4) caregiver uptake of referrals., Methods: Survey of caregivers of children aged 0-8 years attending community health services in Victoria and New South Wales (NSW). Analysis described frequencies of caregiver self-reported: (1) experiences of adversity, (2) practitioner identification of adversity, (3) practitioner response to adversity, and (4) referral uptake. Analyses were sub-grouped by three adversity domains and site., Results: 349 caregivers (Victoria: n = 234; NSW: n = 115) completed the survey of whom 88% reported experiencing one or more family adversities. The median number of adversities was 4 (2-6). Only 43% of participants were directly asked about or discussed an adversity with a practitioner in the previous 6 months (Victoria: 30%; NSW: 68%). Among caregivers experiencing adversity, 30% received direct support (Victoria: 23%; NSW: 43%), and 14% received a referral (Victoria: 10%; NSW: 22%) for at least one adversity. Overall, 74% of caregivers accepted referrals when extended., Conclusion: The needs of Australian families experiencing high rates of adversity are not systematically identified nor responded to in community health services. This leaves significant scope for reform and enhancement of service responses to families experiencing adversity., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Hall, Constable, Loveday, Honisett, Schreurs, Goldfeld, Loftus, Jones, Reupert, Yap, Woolfenden, Montgomery, Dalziel, Bailey, Pringle, Fisher, Forell, Eapen, Haslam, Sanci, Eastwood and Hiscock.)

One in five people experience clinically relevant mental health problems before the age of 25 years. Furthermore, in Australia, one in seven children are reported to experience a mental health disorder. Consequently, there has been a steady increase in demand for mental health services for children and young people, and this has been compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, currently many children and young people with mental health difficulties are not accessing appropriate and/or timely care, with individuals and families finding it increasingly difficult to access and navigate suitable services. In part, this is related to the fragmented and isolated manner in which child mental health services are operating. To address the current issues in access to appropriate child and adolescent mental health care in Australia, a novel Integrated Continuum of Connect and Care model is proposed to integrate relevant services along a tiered care pathway. The aim of this model is to facilitate timely access to mental health services that meet the specific needs of each child/young person and their family. This model will function within co-located service hubs that integrate health care through a comprehensive assessment followed by a link up to relevant services. The Integrated Continuum of Connect and Care has the potential to pave the way for unifying the fragmented child and youth mental health system in Australia.

Objectives : A great deal of attention is being directed at the use of seclusion in adolescent inpatient psychiatric units due to its forceful nature and negative impact on inpatients and staff. This mixed methods study aimed to explore and compare the level of satisfaction with the services received and perspectives on seclusion in secluded and non-secluded adolescent inpatients. Methods : This study included 188 participants, across three adolescent inpatient psychiatric units in Australia; 17% reported having experienced seclusion. A mixed methods approach was employed. Participants completed the Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 and Perceptions of Treatment and Seclusion Questionnaire shortly before or at discharge. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic analysis. Results : Secluded participants were more likely to report issues with broader care experiences on the Consumer Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. Secluded individuals reported ongoing negative effects from seclusion but were more likely than non-secluded participants to believe seclusion is necessary. Qualitative analyses showed that both secluded and non-secluded individuals considered seclusion to be traumatic, many did not agree with its use. Conclusions : Communication between inpatients and staff regarding seclusion needs to be improved and there needs to be ongoing support in relation to seclusion during and after discharge. Many adolescent inpatients acknowledge the necessity of seclusion whilst advocating for reduced seclusion.

Objective: To determine the (1) feasibility and acceptability of administering single question mental health surveillance to carers of children with chronic disease in the inpatient setting and (2) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of this question to detect 'at risk' children compared with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)., Design: Cross-sectional pilot SETTING: Day Medical Unit of a tertiary paediatric hospital, 1 April 2021-31 July 2021., Patients: Carers of children aged 2-17 years with chronic medical conditions., Interventions: Caregivers were asked to respond to 'Thinking about your child's mental health over the past 4 weeks, are they thriving/coping/struggling/always overwhelmed?' during the admission process. All carers and children 11-17 years were invited to complete the SDQ., Main Outcome Measures: Feasibility and acceptability were determined by nursing feedback. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were determined by comparing question responses with clinical cut-points on the SDQ., Results: 213 carers responded to the question. Nurses reported that the question was easy (12/14) or moderately easy (2/14) to use and was 'easily understood' (6/14) or 'understood after some explanation' (8/14) for most carers. The question demonstrated a high specificity (0.98)/PPV (0.87) but low sensitivity (0.2) when thriving/coping were considered together whereas when thriving was compared with all other responses the sensitivity increased to 0.7., Conclusions: Single question mental health surveillance appears acceptable to carers and nursing staff and has a high level of specificity for children who are 'struggling' or 'always overwhelmed' versus the SDQ screening measure., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Integrated community healthcare Hubs may offer a 'one stop shop' for service users with complex health and social needs, and more efficiently use service resources. Various policy imperatives exist to implement Hub models of care, however, there is a dearth of research specifically evaluating Hubs targeted at families experiencing adversity. To contribute to building this evidence, we propose to co-design, test and evaluate integrated Hub models of care in two Australian community health services in low socioeconomic areas that serve families experiencing adversity: Wyndham Vale in Victoria and Marrickville in New South Wales., Methods and Analysis: This multisite convergent mixed-methods study will run over three phases to (1) develop the initial Hub programme theory through formative research; (2) test and, then, (3) refine the Hub theory using empirical data. Phase 1 involves co-design of each Hub with caregivers, community members and practitioners. Phase 2 uses caregiver and Hub practitioner surveys at baseline, and 6 and 12 months after Hub implementation, and in-depth interviews at 12 months. Two stakeholder groups will be recruited: caregivers (n=100-200 per site) and Hub practitioners (n=20-30 per site). The intervention is a co-located Hub providing health, social, legal and community services with no comparator. The primary outcomes are caregiver-reported: (i) identification of, (ii) interventions received and/or (iii) referrals received for adversity from Hub practitioners. The study also assesses child, caregiver, practitioner and system outcomes including mental health, parenting, quality of life, care experience and service linkages. Primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed by examining change in proportions/means from baseline to 6 months, from 6 to 12 months and from baseline to 12 months. Service linkages will be analysed using social network analysis. Costs of Hub implementation and a health economics analysis of unmet need will be conducted. Thematic analysis will be employed to analyse qualitative data., Ethics and Dissemination: Royal Children's Hospital and Sydney Local Health District ethics committees have approved the study (HREC/62866/RCHM-2020). Participants and stakeholders will receive results through meetings, presentations and publications., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN55495932., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To test whether the latent structure of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is best understood as categorical or dimensional in samples of 1774 children (aged 6-12 years) and 1222 adolescents (aged 13-17 years) drawn from an Australian epidemiological study., Method: Two taxometric procedures (MAXEIG and MAMBAC) examined ADHD symptom measures assessed by diagnostic interview and parental ratings., Results: Consistent with behavioural genetic research, findings fail to support the view that a latent category underpins ADHD., Conclusions: ADHD is best modelled as a continuum among both children and adolescents, and no discrete dysfunction can therefore be assumed to cause it. The placement of the diagnostic threshold should therefore be decided on pragmatic grounds (e.g. impairment or need for treatment).