Search

The intersection of cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders and chronic kidney disease represents a complex clinical picture challenging healthcare systems worldwide. Metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) often manifests sequentially or concomitantly with these diseases, and may share underlying mechanisms and risk factors. Growing evidence suggests that new therapies could have benefits across these diseases, but trial sponsors and investigators tend to be reluctant to include patients with comorbidities-particularly liver diseases-in clinical trials. In this Perspective, we call for inclusion of patients with MASLD and measurement of liver outcomes in cardio-kidney-metabolic trials, when data suggest mechanistically plausible benefits and liver and cardiovascular safety. We discuss the implications of this new paradigm for clinical trial design and considerations for regulatory approval. Finally, we outline the challenges to implementing such an approach and provide recommendations for future clinical trial conduct., (© 2024. Springer Nature America, Inc.)

The worldwide epidemics of obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, dyslipidaemia, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)/metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) represent a major economic burden on healthcare systems. Patients with at-risk MASH, defined as MASH with moderate or significant fibrosis, are at higher risk of comorbidity/mortality, with a significant risk of cardiovascular diseases and/or major adverse liver outcomes. Despite a high unmet medical need, there is only one drug approved for MASH. Several drug candidates have reached the phase III development stage and could lead to several potential conditional drug approvals in the coming years. Within the armamentarium of future treatment options, FGF21 analogues hold an interesting position thanks to their pleiotropic effects in addition to their significant effect on both MASH resolution and fibrosis improvement. In this review, we summarise preclinical and clinical data from FGF21 analogues for MASH and explore additional potential therapeutic indications., (Copyright © 2024 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

T-cell immunoglobin and mucin domain protein-1 (TIM-1) mediates entry of chikungunya virus (CHIKV) into some mammalian cells through the interaction with envelope phospholipids. While this interaction enhances entry, TIM-1 has been shown to tether newly formed HIV and Ebola virus particles, limiting their efficient release. In this study, we investigate the ability of surface receptors such as TIM-1 to sequester newly budded virions on the surface of infected cells. We established a luminescence reporter system to produce chikungunya viral particles that integrate nano-luciferase and easily quantify viral particles. We found that TIM-1 on the surface of host cells significantly reduced CHIKV release efficiency in comparison to other entry factors. Removal of cell surface TIM-1 through direct cellular knock-out or altering the cellular lipid distribution enhanced CHIKV release. Over the course of infection, CHIKV was able to counteract the tethering effect by gradually decreasing the surface levels of TIM-1 in a process mediated by the nonstructural protein 2. This study highlights the importance of phosphatidylserine receptors in mediating not only the entry of CHIKV but also its release and could aid in developing cell lines capable of enhanced vaccine production., Importance: Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is an enveloped alphavirus transmitted by the bites of infectious mosquitoes. Infection with CHIKV results in the development of fever, joint pain, and arthralgia that can become chronic and last for months after infection. Prevention of this disease is still highly focused on vector control strategies. In December 2023, a new live attenuated vaccine against CHIKV was approved by the FDA. We aimed to study the cellular factors involved in CHIKV release, to better understand CHIKV's ability to efficiently infect and spread among a wide variety of cell lines. We found that TIM-1 receptors can significantly abrogate CHIKV's ability to efficiently exit infected cells. This information can be beneficial for maximizing viral particle production in laboratory settings and during vaccine manufacturing., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background & Aims: There is a need to reduce the screen failure rate (SFR) in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials (MASH+F2-3; MASH+F4) and identify people with high-risk MASH (MASH+F2-4) in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate non-invasive tests (NITs) screening approaches for these target conditions., Methods: This was an individual participant data meta-analysis for the performance of NITs against liver biopsy for MASH+F2-4, MASH+F2-3 and MASH+F4. Index tests were the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score, liver stiffness measured using vibration-controlled transient elastography (LSM-VCTE), the fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4) and the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS). Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and thresholds including those that achieved 34% SFR were reported., Results: We included 2281 unique cases. The prevalence of MASH+F2-4, MASH+F2-3 and MASH+F4 was 31%, 24% and 7%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F2-4 were .78, .75, .68 and .57 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F2-3 were .73, .67, .60, .58 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curves for MASH+F4 were .79, .84, .81, .76 for FAST, LSM-VCTE, FIB-4 and NFS. The sequential combination of FIB-4 and LSM-VCTE for the detection of MASH+F2-3 with threshold of .7 and 3.48, and 5.9 and 20 kPa achieved SFR of 67% and sensitivity of 60%, detecting 15 true positive cases from a theoretical group of 100 participants at the prevalence of 24%., Conclusions: Sequential combinations of NITs do not compromise diagnostic performance and may reduce resource utilisation through the need of fewer LSM-VCTE examinations., (© 2024 The Authors. Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects 1 in 3-4 adult individuals and can progress to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and cirrhosis. Insulin resistance plays a central role in MASLD/MASH pathophysiology with higher rates of MASLD (2 in 3) and MASH with fibrosis (1 in 5) in adults with obesity and diabetes. This review summarizes the role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in treating MASLD/MASH. Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of MASLD, this class of medication is available to treat obesity and type 2 diabetes and has been shown to reverse steatohepatitis, reduce cardiovascular risk, and is safe to use across the spectrum of MASLD with or without fibrosis., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease affects 1 in 4 people in the United States and western Europe, with an important proportion developing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), the progressive subtype of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Cirrhosis caused by MASH is a leading indication for liver transplantation and the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hitherto, there have been no specific pharmacotherapies for MASH. The recent conditional approval by the Food and Drug Administration of resmetirom for the treatment of moderate or advanced MASH presents a much-anticipated therapeutic option for patients with noncirrhotic advanced MASH. Specifically, the intended population for resmetirom are patients with MASH and fibrosis stages 2 or 3. The approval of resmetirom also presents important challenges, including how to noninvasively identify patients with fibrosis stages 2-3, and how to exclude patients with more advanced disease who should not be treated until further data emerge on the use of resmetirom in this population. Herein we consider the available literature with regard to identifying the intended population for treatment with resmetirom and in proposing criteria for stopping treatment., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the effects of pemvidutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)/glucagon dual receptor agonist, on liver fat content (LFC) in subjects with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD)., Methods: Subjects with a BMI ≥28.0 kg/m 2 and LFC ≥10% by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction were randomized 1:1:1:1 to pemvidutide at 1.2 mg, 1.8 mg, or 2.4 mg, or placebo administered subcutaneously once weekly for 12 weeks. Participants were stratified according to a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The primary efficacy endpoint was relative reduction (%) from baseline in LFC after 12 weeks of treatment., Results: 94 subjects were randomized and dosed. Median baseline BMI and LFC across the study population were 36.2 kg/m 2 and 20.6%; 29% of subjects had T2DM. At Week 12, relative reductions in LFC from baseline were (1.2 mg) 46.6% [95% CI -63.7 to -29.6], (1.8 mg) 68.5% [95% CI -84.4 to -52.5], and (2.4 mg) 57.1% [95% CI -76.1 to -38.1] versus 4.4% [95% CI -20.2 to 11.3] in placebo subjects (p <0.001 vs. placebo, all treatment groups), with 94.4% and 72.2% of subjects achieving 30% and 50% reductions in LFC and 55.6% achieving normalization (≤5% LFC) at the 1.8 mg dose. Maximal responses for weight loss (-4.3%; p <0.001), alanine aminotransferase (-13.8 IU/L; p = 0.029), and corrected cT1 (-75.9 ms; p = 0.002) were all observed at the 1.8 mg dose. Pemvidutide was well-tolerated at all doses with no severe or serious adverse events., Conclusions: In subjects with MASLD, weekly pemvidutide treatment yielded significant reductions in LFC, markers of hepatic inflammation, and body weight compared to placebo., Impact and Implications: MASLD, and MASH, are strongly associated with overweight and obesity and it is believed that the excess liver fat associated with obesity is an important driver of these diseases. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists elicit weight loss through centrally and peripherally mediated effects on appetite. Unlike GLP-1R agonists, glucagon receptor (GCGR) agonists act directly on the liver to stimulate fatty acid oxidation and inhibit lipogenesis, potentially providing a more potent mechanism for liver fat content (LFC) reduction than weight loss alone. This study demonstrated the ability of once-weekly treatment with pemvidutide, a dual GLP-1R/GCGR agonist, to significantly reduce LFC, hepatic inflammatory activity, and body weight, suggesting that pemvidutide may be an effective treatment for both MASH and obesity., Clinical Trial Number: NCT05006885., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest S.A.H. and J.A.G. are paid consultants to Altimmune, Inc. S.K.B., J.J.S., S.T., J.Y., M.S.R., and M.S.H. are employees of Altimmune, Inc. and hold a financial interest in the company., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is a worldwide public health problem, causing considerable morbidity and mortality. Patients with SLD are at increased risk for major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease. Conversely, patients with cardiometabolic conditions have a high prevalence of SLD. In addition to epidemiological evidence linking many of these conditions, there is evidence of shared pathophysiological processes. In December 2022, a unique multi-stakeholder, multi-specialty meeting, called MOSAIC (Metabolic multi Organ Science Accelerating Innovation in Clinical Trials) was convened to foster collaboration across metabolic, hepatology, nephrology and CV disorders. One of the goals of the meeting was to consider approaches to drug development that would speed regulatory approval of treatments for multiple disorders by combining liver and cardiorenal endpoints within a single study. Non-invasive tests, including biomarkers and imaging, are needed in hepatic and cardiorenal trials. They can be used as trial endpoints, to enrich trial populations, to diagnose and risk stratify patients and to assess treatment efficacy and safety. Although they are used in proof of concept and phase 2 trials, they are often not acceptable for regulatory approval of therapies. The challenge is defining the optimal combination of biomarkers, imaging and morbidity/mortality outcomes and ensuring that they are included in future trials while minimizing the burden on patients, trialists and trial sponsors. This paper provides an overview of some of the wide array of CV, liver and kidney measurements that were discussed at the MOSAIC meeting., (© 2024 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Background & Aims: In the American Gastroenterological Association/American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AGA/AASLD) Clinical Care Pathway, Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) is used to stratify patients at risk for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) as low-, indeterminate-, or high-risk for developing advanced liver fibrosis. We assessed the performance of FIB-4 in a general population., Methods: Using the 2017 to 2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys dataset, we selected subjects ≥18 years who had FibroScan data. We followed AGA/AASLD guidelines to identify subjects with characteristics that place them at risk for MASLD-associated liver fibrosis. Other causes of liver disease were excluded. Our final cohort had 3741 subjects. We then categorized these subjects based on recommended FIB-4 cutoffs. FibroScan liver stiffness measurement (LSM) served as the outcome measurement., Results: Among the 2776 subjects (74.2%) classified as low risk by FIB-4, 277 subjects (10%) were not classified at low risk by LSM, and 75 subjects (2.7%) were classified as high risk by LSM. Among the 86 subjects classified as high risk by FIB-4, 68 subjects (79.1%) were not at high risk by LSM, and 54 subjects (62.8%) were at low risk by LSM. Subjects misclassified by FIB-4 as low risk were older; had a higher body mass index, waist circumference, glycohemoglobin A1c level, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, diastolic blood pressure, controlled attenuation parameter score, white blood cell count, alkaline phosphatase, and fasting glucose level; but had lower high-density lipoprotein, and albumin level (all P < .05). Misclassified subjects were also more likely to have prediabetes/diabetes., Conclusion: Using FIB-4 in the AGA/AASLD guidelines to risk-stratify subjects at risk for MASLD-associated fibrosis results in many subjects being misclassified into the low- and high-risk categories. Therefore, it may be worthwhile considering caution in interpretation and/or alternative strategies., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Artificial intelligence-powered digital pathology offers the potential to quantify histological findings in a reproducible way. This analysis compares the evaluation of histological features of NASH between pathologists and a machine-learning (ML) pathology model., Approach and Results: This post hoc analysis included data from a subset of patients (n=251) with biopsy-confirmed NASH and fibrosis stage F1-F3 from a 72-week randomized placebo-controlled trial of once-daily subcutaneous semaglutide 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg (NCT02970942). Biopsies at baseline and week 72 were read by 2 pathologists. Digitized biopsy slides were evaluated by PathAI's NASH ML models to quantify changes in fibrosis, steatosis, inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning using categorical assessments and continuous scores. Pathologist and ML-derived categorical assessments detected a significantly greater percentage of patients achieving the primary endpoint of NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis with semaglutide 0.4 mg versus placebo (pathologist 58.5% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.0001; ML 36.9% vs. 11.9%; p =0.0015). Both methods detected a higher but nonsignificant percentage of patients on semaglutide 0.4 mg versus placebo achieving the secondary endpoint of liver fibrosis improvement without NASH worsening. ML continuous scores detected significant treatment-induced responses in histological features, including a quantitative reduction in fibrosis with semaglutide 0.4 mg versus placebo ( p =0.0099) that could not be detected using pathologist or ML categorical assessment., Conclusions: ML categorical assessments reproduced pathologists' results of histological improvement with semaglutide for steatosis and disease activity. ML-based continuous scores demonstrated an antifibrotic effect not measured by conventional histopathology., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

During recent decades, the metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) field has witnessed several paradigm shifts, including the recognition of liver fibrosis as the main predictor of major adverse liver outcomes. Throughout this evolution, liver histology has been recognised as one of the main hurdles in MASH drug development due to its invasive nature, associated cost, and high inter- and intra-reader variability. Collective experience demonstrates the importance of consistency in the central reading process, where consensus methods have emerged as appropriate ways to mitigate against well-known challenges. Using crystalized knowledge in the field, stakeholders should collectively work towards the next paradigm shift, where non-invasive biomarkers will be considered surrogate endpoints for accelerated approval. In this review, we provide an overview of the evolution of the regulatory histology endpoints and the liver biopsy reading process, within the MASH trial landscape, over recent decades; we then review the biggest challenges associated with liver biopsy endpoints. Finally, we discuss and provide recommendations on the best practices for liver biopsy evaluation in MASH drug development., (Copyright © 2024 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Despite its considerable and growing burden, there are currently no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease or its progressive form, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and other agents are in various phases of clinical development for use in MASH; an ideal therapy should reduce liver fat content, improve chronic liver disease, help mitigate metabolic comorbidities and decrease all-cause mortality. Because of interconnected disease mechanisms, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease/MASH often coexists with type 2 diabetes (T2D), obesity and cardiovascular disease. Various GLP-1RAs are Food and Drug Administration-approved for use in T2D, and two, liraglutide and semaglutide, are approved for overweight and obesity. GLP-1RAs decrease glucose levels and body weight and improve cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2D who are at high risk of cardiovascular disease. In addition, GLP-1RAs have been reported to reduce liver fat content and liver enzymes, reduce oxidative stress and improve hepatic de novo lipogenesis and the histopathology of MASH. Weight loss may contribute to these effects; however, the exact mechanisms are unknown. Adverse events that are commonly associated with GLP-1RAs include vomiting, nausea and diarrhoea. There is a lack of evidence from meta-analyses regarding the increased risk of acute pancreatitis and various forms of cancer with GLP-1RAs. Large-scale, phase 3 trials, which will provide definitive data on GLP-1RAs and other potential therapies in MASH, are ongoing. Given the spectrum of modalities under investigation, it is hoped that these trials will support the identification of pharmacotherapies that provide clinical benefit for patients with MASH., (© 2024 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Importance: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is currently the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. It is important to develop noninvasive tests to assess the disease severity and prognosis., Objective: To study the prognostic implications of baseline levels and dynamic changes of the vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE)-based scores developed for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis (Agile 3+) and cirrhosis (Agile 4) in patients with MASLD., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included data from a natural history cohort of patients with MASLD who underwent VCTE examination at 16 tertiary referral centers in the US, Europe, and Asia from February 2004 to January 2023, of which the data were collected prospectively at 14 centers. Eligible patients were adults aged at least 18 years with hepatic steatosis diagnosed by histologic methods (steatosis in ≥5% of hepatocytes) or imaging studies (ultrasonography, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, or controlled attenuation parameter ≥248 dB/m by VCTE)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was liver-related events (LREs), defined as hepatocellular carcinoma or hepatic decompensation (ascites, variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, or hepatorenal syndrome), liver transplant, and liver-related deaths. The Agile scores were compared with histologic and 8 other noninvasive tests., Results: A total of 16 603 patients underwent VCTE examination at baseline (mean [SD] age, 52.5 [13.7] years; 9600 [57.8%] were male). At a median follow-up of 51.7 (IQR, 25.2-85.2) months, 316 patients (1.9%) developed LREs. Both Agile 3+ and Agile 4 scores classified fewer patients between the low and high cutoffs than most fibrosis scores and achieved the highest discriminatory power in predicting LREs (integrated area under the time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.89). A total of 10 920 patients (65.8%) had repeated VCTE examination at a median interval of 15 (IQR, 11.3-27.7) months and were included in the serial analysis. A total of 81.9% of patients (7208 of 8810) had stable Agile 3+ scores and 92.6% of patients (8163 of 8810) had stable Agile 4 scores (same risk categories at both assessments). The incidence of LREs was 0.6 per 1000 person-years in patients with persistently low Agile 3+ scores and 30.1 per 1000 person-years in patients with persistently high Agile 3+ scores. In patients with high Agile 3+ score at baseline, a decrease in the score by more than 20% was associated with substantial reduction in the risk of LREs. A similar trend was observed for the Agile 4 score, although it missed more LREs in the low-risk group., Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this study suggest that single or serial Agile scores are highly accurate in predicting LREs in patients with MASLD, making them suitable alternatives to liver biopsy in routine clinical practice and in phase 2b and 3 clinical trials for steatohepatitis.

Background: The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is increasing worldwide. Primary care providers play a critical role in the screening, diagnosis, and management of MASLD and/or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), though they can face challenges in this setting, particularly where healthcare resources are limited and barriers to care exist. To address these challenges, several guidelines have been developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the clinical assessment and management of patients with MASLD/MASH., Aims: To provide a unified, simple-to-understand, practical guide for MASLD screening, diagnosis, and management based on current guideline recommendations, for use by primary care providers in daily practice., Methods: Evidence-based recommendations from several international guidelines were summarized, focusing on the similarities and differences between them., Results: Recommendations are broadly aligned across the guidelines, but several key differences are evident. Practical guidance is provided on screening, identifying target populations for risk stratification, initial evaluation of individuals with suspected MASLD, surveillance, risk stratification and referral, as well as approaches to the management of MASLD and associated comorbidities, with specific considerations for the primary care setting., Conclusions: Primary care providers are ideally placed to identify at-risk individuals, implement evidence-based interventions to prevent the development of fibrosis and cirrhosis, and effectively manage comorbidities. Equipping primary care providers with the necessary knowledge and tools to effectively manage MASLD/MASH may help to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of liver disease.

Background & Aims: In phase 2 studies, efruxifermin, an Fc-FGF21 analog, significantly reduced steatohepatitis and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, now called metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), for which there is no approved treatment. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are prevalent among patients with MASH and increasingly treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of efruxifermin in patients with MASH, fibrosis, and T2D taking a GLP-1RA., Methods: Cohort D was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study in adults with T2D and MASH with fibrosis (F1-F3) on stable GLP-1RA therapy randomized (2:1) to receive efruxifermin 50 mg or placebo, once weekly for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of efruxifermin added to a stable dose of GLP-1RA. Secondary endpoints included changes in hepatic fat fraction (HFF), markers of liver injury and fibrosis, and metabolic parameters., Results: Adults (N = 31) with T2D and MASH fibrosis (F1-F3) on a stable GLP-1RA (semaglutide, 48.4%; dulaglutide, 45.2%; liraglutide, 6.5%) received efruxifermin 50 mg (n = 21) or placebo (n = 10) for 12 weeks. The addition of efruxifermin to a GLP-1RA appeared safe and well-tolerated. The most frequent efruxifermin-related adverse events were mild to moderate gastrointestinal events. One patient receiving efruxifermin discontinued due to nausea, and another withdrew consent. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events. After 12 weeks, efruxifermin reduced HFF by 65% (P < .0001 vs placebo) compared with a 10% reduction for placebo (GLP-1RA alone). Efruxifermin also improved noninvasive markers of liver injury, fibrosis, glucose, and lipid metabolism while maintaining GLP-1RA-mediated weight loss., Conclusions: The tolerability profile of efruxifermin added to GLP-1RA appeared comparable to that of either drug alone, while also significantly reducing HFF and noninvasive markers of fibrosis in patients with MASH and T2D. Liver health in patients already on a GLP-1RA may be further improved by addition of efruxifermin., Clinicaltrials: gov, Number: NCT05039450., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Aldafermin, an engineered analog of the human hormone FGF19, improves liver histology in patients with noncirrhotic NASH; however, its efficacy and safety in compensated cirrhosis is unknown. No drug has yet to demonstrate benefit in the compensated NASH population., Approach and Results: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial, 160 patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis were randomized to aldafermin 0.3 mg (n = 7), 1 mg (n = 42), 3 mg (n = 55), or placebo (n = 56) for 48 weeks. The 0.3 mg group was discontinued to limit exposure to suboptimal doses. The primary end point was a change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis from baseline to week 48. The analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population. At week 48, the least-squares mean difference in the change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis was -0.5 (95% CI, -0.7 to -0.2; p = 0.0003) between the 3 mg group and the placebo group. 15%, 21%, and 23% of patients in the placebo, 1 mg, and 3 mg group, respectively, achieved fibrosis improvement ≥ 1 stage; and 13%, 16%, and 20% achieved fibrosis improvement ≥ 1 stage without NASH worsening. Improvement in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, neoepitope-specific N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen, and liver stiffness favored aldefermin groups over placebo. Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event, occurring at 26% and 40% in the 1 mg and 3 mg groups, respectively, compared to 18% in the placebo group. Overall, 0%, 2%, and 9% of patients in the placebo, 1 mg, and 3 mg group, respectively, discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events., Conclusions: Aldafermin 3 mg resulted in a significant reduction in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis in patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive liver disease with no approved treatment. Resmetirom is an oral, liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta-selective agonist in development for the treatment of NASH with liver fibrosis., Methods: We are conducting an ongoing phase 3 trial involving adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH and a fibrosis stage of F1B, F2, or F3 (stages range from F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily resmetirom at a dose of 80 mg or 100 mg or placebo. The two primary end points at week 52 were NASH resolution (including a reduction in the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD] activity score by ≥2 points; scores range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease) with no worsening of fibrosis, and an improvement (reduction) in fibrosis by at least one stage with no worsening of the NAFLD activity score., Results: Overall, 966 patients formed the primary analysis population (322 in the 80-mg resmetirom group, 323 in the 100-mg resmetirom group, and 321 in the placebo group). NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis was achieved in 25.9% of the patients in the 80-mg resmetirom group and 29.9% of those in the 100-mg resmetirom group, as compared with 9.7% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons with placebo). Fibrosis improvement by at least one stage with no worsening of the NAFLD activity score was achieved in 24.2% of the patients in the 80-mg resmetirom group and 25.9% of those in the 100-mg resmetirom group, as compared with 14.2% of those in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons with placebo). The change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from baseline to week 24 was -13.6% in the 80-mg resmetirom group and -16.3% in the 100-mg resmetirom group, as compared with 0.1% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both comparisons with placebo). Diarrhea and nausea were more frequent with resmetirom than with placebo. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar across trial groups: 10.9% in the 80-mg resmetirom group, 12.7% in the 100-mg resmetirom group, and 11.5% in the placebo group., Conclusions: Both the 80-mg dose and the 100-mg dose of resmetirom were superior to placebo with respect to NASH resolution and improvement in liver fibrosis by at least one stage. (Funded by Madrigal Pharmaceuticals; MAESTRO-NASH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03900429.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Oat crown rust, caused by Puccinia coronata Corda f. sp. avenae Eriks. (Pca), is a major biotic impediment to global oat production. Crown rust resistance has been described in oat diploid species A. strigosa accession PI 258731 and resistance from this accession has been successfully introgressed into hexaploid A. sativa germplasm. The current study focuses on 1) mapping the location of QTL containing resistance and evaluating the number of quantitative trait loci (QTL) conditioning resistance in PI 258731; 2) understanding the relationship between the original genomic location in A. strigosa and the location of the introgression in the A. sativa genome; 3) identifying molecular markers tightly linked with PI 258731 resistance loci that could be used for marker assisted selection and detection of this resistance in diverse A. strigosa accessions. To achieve this, A. strigosa accessions, PI 258731 and PI 573582 were crossed to produce 168 F5:6 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) through single seed descent. Parents and RILs were genotyped with the 6K Illumina SNP array which generated 168 segregating SNPs. Seedling reactions to two isolates of Pca (races TTTG, QTRG) were conditioned by two genes (0.6 cM apart) in this population. Linkage mapping placed these two resistant loci to 7.7 (QTRG) to 8 (TTTG) cM region on LG7. Field reaction data was used for QTL analysis and the results of interval mapping (MIM) revealed a major QTL (QPc.FD-AS-AA4) for field resistance. SNP marker assays were developed and tested in 125 diverse A. strigosa accessions that were rated for crown rust resistance in Baton Rouge, LA and Gainesville, FL and as seedlings against races TTTG and QTRG. Our data proposed SNP marker GMI&#95;ES17&#95;c6425&#95;188 as a candidate for use in marker-assisted selection, in addition to the marker GMI&#95;ES02&#95;c37788&#95;255 suggested by Rine's group, which provides an additional tool in facilitating the utilization of this gene in oat breeding programs., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist, (Copyright: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.)

Background & Aims: Strategies to reduce liver biopsy (LB) screen failures through better patient selection are needed for clinical trials. Standard fibrosis biomarkers were not derived to detect "at-risk" metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; MASH with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease score ≥4 and fibrosis stage ≥2). We compared the performance of screening pathways that incorporate NIS2+™, an optimized version of the blood-based NIS4® technology designed to identify at-risk MASH, with those incorporating fibrosis (FIB)-4 within the RESOLVE-IT clinical trial (NCT02704403), aiming for optimized selection of patients for LB., Methods: A retrospective simulation analysis was conducted in the RESOLVE-IT screening pathway (RSP) cohort. LB failure rate (LBFR), number of patients needed to screen, and overall cost estimations of different pathways were calculated for a range of NIS2+™ and FIB-4 cut-offs and compared with those of the RSP, which relied on investigators' local practices. An analysis of potential recruitment bias based on histology, sex, age, or comorbidities was performed., Results: The analysis cohort included 1,929 patients, 765 (40%) with at-risk MASH. The NIS2+™ pathway resulted in a significantly lower LBFR (39%) compared with the FIB-4 pathway (58%) or the RSP (60%) when using cost-optimized cut-offs (NIS2+™, 0.53; FIB-4, 0.58). For every 1,000 inclusions, NIS2+™ significantly reduced unnecessary LBs (632 vs. 1,522; -58%) and screening costs (US$12.7 million vs. US$15.0 million) vs. the RSP, while the number of patients needed to screen increased moderately (3,220 to 4,033). NIS2+™ alone is better than FIB-4 alone or combined with FIB-4., Conclusions: This analysis demonstrated that patient selection for LB using NIS2+™ significantly reduced unnecessary biopsies and screening costs, which could greatly improve the feasibility of MASH clinical trials., Impact and Implications: Simple and accurate non-invasive strategies to optimize the selection of patients who should be referred for liver biopsy for inclusion in MASH clinical trials is critical to reduce the high liver biopsy failure rates. While the use of the Fibrosis-4 index alone did not lead to a significant improvement of the screening process, selecting patients using NIS2+™, a recently developed optimization of the NIS4® technology for the detection of at-risk MASH, showed improved performance by simultaneously reducing liver biopsy failure rates and the overall cost of the trial, while maintaining the number of patients needed to screen at a manageable level and not generating any bias in included patients' characteristics. This makes NIS2+™ an accurate and reliable screening tool that could improve the recruitment of patients in future MASH clinical trials, and would lead to increased patient comfort and security, ensuring timely and cost-efficient trial completion., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Robust performance of non-invasive tests (NITs) across ages is critical to assess liver disease among patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease (MASLD). We evaluated the impact of age on the performance of NIS2+™ vs. other NITs., Methods: An analysis cohort (N = 1,926) with biopsy-proven MASLD was selected among individuals screened for the phase III RESOLVE-IT clinical trial and divided into ≤45, 46-55, 56-64, and ≥65 years groups. To avoid potential confounding effects, a well-balanced cohort (n = 708; n = 177/age group) was obtained by applying a propensity score-matching algorithm to the analysis cohort. Baseline values of biomarkers and NITs were compared across age groups using one-way ANOVA, and the impact of age and histology were compared through three-way ANOVA. The impact of age on NIT performance for the detection of at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; MASLD activity score [MAS] ≥4 and fibrosis stage [F] ≥2) was also evaluated., Results: Age did not affect the distributions of NIS2+™ and APRI (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index), but significantly ( p <0.0001) impacted those of NFS (NAFLD fibrosis score), FIB-4 (Fibrosis-4 index), and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF™) score. NIS2+™ was the only NIT on which fibrosis and MAS exerted a moderate to large effect. While the impact of fibrosis on APRI was moderate, that of MAS was low. The impact of age on FIB-4 and NFS was larger than that of fibrosis. NIS2+™ exhibited the highest AUROC values for detecting at-risk MASH across age groups, with stable performances irrespective of cut-offs., Conclusions: NIS2+™ was not significantly impacted by age and was sensitive to both fibrosis and MAS grade, demonstrating a robust performance to rule in/out at-risk MASH with fixed cut-offs., Impact and Implications: While metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) can affect individuals of all ages, patient age could represent an important confounding factor when interpreting non-invasive test (NIT) results, highlighting the need for reliable and efficient NITs that are not impacted by age and that could be interpreted with fixed cut-offs, irrespective of patient age. We report the impact of age on different well-established NITs - among those tested, only two panels, NIS2+™ and APRI, were not impacted by age and can be used and interpreted independently of patient age. NIS2+™ was also sensitive to both fibrosis and MAS, further confirming its efficiency for the detection of the composite endpoint of at-risk MASH and its potential as a valuable candidate for large-scale implementation in clinical practice and clinical trials., Competing Interests: QMA: research support from LITMUS (Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis) consortium funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative Program of the European Union under Grant Agreement 777377 (this multistakeholder consortium includes industry partners and received funding from EFPIA); grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals; royalties or licenses from Elsevier Ltd.; consulting fees (on behalf of Newcastle University) from Alimentiv, Akero Therapeutics, Inc., AstraZeneca, Axcella Health, Inc., 89bio, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Genfit S.A., Genentech, Gilead Sciences Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Hanmi, HistoIndex Pte Ltd., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Prosciento, Poxel S.A., Resolution Therapeutics, Roche, Ridgeline Therapeutics, RTI, Shionogi, and Terns Pharmaceuticals; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare; served on advisory boards or data safety monitoring boards (on behalf of Newcastle University) for Medpace (NorthSea Therapeutics B.V., DSMB). BS: consulting fees from Genfit S.A. MAC: Labcorp employee. RL: grants/funding support from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Hanmi, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes, and Terns Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Anylam/Regeneron, Amgen, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CohBar, Inc., Eli Lilly, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glympse Bio, HighTide Therapeutics, Ini Pharma, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, Theratechnologies, Inc., 89bio, Inc., Terns Pharmaceuticals, and Viking Therapeutics; other financial interests: LipoNexus, Inc. (co-founder). SAH: grants or contracts from Akero Therapeutics, Alentis Therapeutics, Altimmune, B. Riley FBR, ChronWell, Corcept Therapeutics, Echosens, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay Therapeutics, Inc., Enyo Pharma S.A., Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Galmed Research & Development, Ltd., Genfit S.A., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hepta Bio, HighTide Therapeutics, Inc, HistoIndex, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ionis, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., NeuroBo, NorthSea Therapeutics B.V., Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Path AI, Perspectum, Poxel S.A., Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes, Terns Pharmaceuticals, and Viking Therapeutics; stock or stock options for Akero Therapeutics, ChronWell, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Genfit S.A., Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., HistoIndex Pte Ltd., Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., NorthSea Therapeutics B.V. VR: grants or contracts from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead Sciences, Inc.; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Poxel S.A., Enyo Pharma S.A., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, NGM Biopharmaceuticals Inc., and Pfizer. AJS: stock options in Genfit S.A., Tiziana, Indalo, Durect, Inversago, and Galmed Pharmaceuticals; consultant to AstraZeneca, Salix, Tobira, Takeda, Jannsen, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Terns Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Sagimet Biosciences, Valeant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Hemoshear, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Enyo, Akero Therapeutics, 89bio, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Amgen, Genentech, Regeneron, Alnylam, Hanmi, LG Chem, Histoindex, Thera Technologies, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Target-RWE, Surrozen, Zydus, Path AI, Exhalenz, and Genfit S.A.; his institution has received grant support from Gilead Sciences, Inc., Salix, Tobira, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Merck, AstraZeneca, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals; royalties received from Elsevier and UpToDate. JM, YH, AC, ZM, CR, and DWH: stock or stock options from Genfit S.A. and serve as Genfit S.A. employees. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Causality assessment of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) clinical trials can be challenging, and liver biopsies are not routinely performed as part of this evaluation. While the field is moving away from liver biopsy as a diagnostic and prognostic tool, information not identified by non-invasive testing may be provided on histology., Aim: To address the appropriate utilisation of liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment in this setting., Methods: From 2020 to 2022, the Liver Forum convened a series of webinars on issues pertaining to liver biopsy during MASH trials. The Histology Working Group was formed to generate a series of consensus documents addressing these challenges. This manuscript focuses on liver biopsy as part of DILI causality assessment., Results: Expert opinion, guidance and recommendations on the role of liver biopsy as part of causality assessment of suspected DILI occurring during clinical trials for a drug(s) being developed for MASH are provided. Lessons learned from prior MASH programs are reviewed and gaps identified., Conclusions: Although there are no pathognomonic features, histologic evaluation of suspected DILI during MASH clinical trials may alter patient management, define the pattern and severity of injury, detect findings that favour a diagnosis of DILI versus MASH progression, identify prognostic features, characterise the clinicopathological phenotype of DILI, and/or define lesions that influence decisions about trial discontinuation and further development of the drug., (© 2023 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) associated with steatosis, hepatocellular injury, inflammation and fibrosis. In a Phase 2 trial in adults with NASH (NCT02912260), resmetirom, an orally administered, liver-targeted thyroid hormone receptor-β selective agonist, significantly reduced hepatic fat (via imaging) and resolved NASH without worsening fibrosis (via liver biopsy) in a significant number of patients compared with placebo., Aims: To present the design of the Phase 3 MAESTRO clinical programme evaluating resmetirom for treatment of NASH (MAESTRO-NAFLD-1 [NCT04197479], MAESTRO-NAFLD-OLE [NCT04951219], MAESTRO-NASH [NCT03900429], MAESTRO-NASH-OUTCOMES [NCT05500222])., Methods: MAESTRO-NASH is a pivotal serial biopsy trial in up to 2000 adults with biopsy-confirmed at-risk NASH. Patients are randomised to a once-daily oral placebo, 80 mg resmetirom, or 100 mg resmetirom. Liver biopsies are conducted at screening, week 52 and month 54. MAESTRO-NAFLD-1 is a 52-week safety trial in ~1400 adults with NAFLD/presumed NASH (based on non-invasive testing); ~700 patients from MAESTRO-NAFLD-1 are enrolled in MAESTRO-NAFLD-OLE, a 52-week active treatment extension to further evaluate safety. MAESTRO-NASH-OUTCOMES is enrolling 700 adults with well-compensated NASH cirrhosis to evaluate the potential for resmetirom to slow progression to hepatic decompensation events. Non-invasive tests (biomarkers, imaging) are assessed longitudinally throughout, in addition to validated patient-reported outcomes., Conclusion: The MAESTRO clinical programme was designed in conjunction with regulatory authorities to support approval of resmetirom for treatment of NASH. The surrogate endpoints, based on week 52 liver biopsy, serum biomarkers and imaging, are confirmed by long-term clinical liver-related outcomes in MAESTRO-NASH (month 54) and MAESTRO-NASH-OUTCOMES (time to event)., (© 2023 Madrigal Pharmaceuticals. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Seladelpar is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ agonist that targets multiple cell types involved in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), leading to anti-cholestatic, anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects., Aims: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with PBC., Methods: In an open-label, international, long-term extension study, patients with PBC completing seladelpar lead-in studies continued treatment. Seladelpar was taken orally once daily at doses of 5 or 10 mg with dose adjustment permitted for safety or tolerability. The primary analysis was for safety and the secondary efficacy analysis examined biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury. The study was terminated early due to the unexpected histological findings in a concurrent study for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which were subsequently found to predate treatment. Safety and efficacy data were analysed through 2 years., Results: There were no serious treatment-related adverse events observed among 106 patients treated with seladelpar for up to 2 years. There were four discontinuations for safety, one possibly related to seladelpar. Among 53 patients who completed 2 years of seladelpar, response rates increased from years 1 to 2 for the composite endpoint (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] <1.67 × ULN, ≥15% decrease in ALP, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalisation from 66% to 79% and from 26% to 42%, respectively. In those with elevated bilirubin at baseline, 43% achieved normalisation at year 2., Conclusions: Seladelpar was safe, and markedly improved biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury in patients with PBC. These effects were maintained or improved throughout the second year., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT03301506; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2017-003910-16., (© 2023 CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc and The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Early identification of those with NAFLD activity score ≥ 4 and significant fibrosis (≥F2) or at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a priority as these patients are at increased risk for disease progression and may benefit from therapies. We developed and validated a highly specific metabolomics-driven score to identify at-risk MASH., Methods: We included derivation (n = 790) and validation (n = 565) cohorts from international tertiary centers. Patients underwent laboratory assessment and liver biopsy for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Based on 12 lipids, body mass index, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase, the MASEF score was developed to identify at-risk MASH and compared to the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score. We further compared the performance of a FIB-4 + MASEF algorithm to that of FIB-4 + liver stiffness measurements (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE)., Results: The diagnostic performance of the MASEF score showed an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.76 (95% CI 0.72-0.79), 0.69, 0.74, 0.53, and 0.85 in the derivation cohort, and 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.83), 0.78, 0.65, 0.48, and 0.88 in the validation cohort, while FibroScan-AST performance in the validation cohort was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.79; p = 0.064), 0.58, 0.79, 0.67, and 0.73, respectively. FIB-4+MASEF showed similar overall performance compared with FIB-4 + LSM by VCTE ( p = 0.69) to identify at-risk MASH., Conclusion: MASEF is a promising diagnostic tool for the assessment of at-risk MASH. It could be used alternatively to LSM by VCTE in the algorithm that is currently recommended by several guidance publications., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Manal F. Abdelmalek consults, advises, and received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, and Madrigal. She consults and advises 89Bio, Merck, NGM Bio, Novo Nordisk, Sonic Incytes, and Theratechnologies. She is on the speakers’ bureau for the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation, Clinical Care Options, Fishawack, Medscape, and Terra Firma. She received grants from Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Durect, Enanta, Enyo, Galmed, Genentech, Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Target NASH, and Viking. Quentin M. Anstee, on behalf of Newcastle University, consults for Alimentiv, Akero, AstraZeneca, Axcella, 89Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galmed, GENFIT, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Hanmi, HistoIndex, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, Medpace, Merck, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Pharmanest, Prosciento, Poxel, RTI, Resolution Therapeutics, Ridgeline Therapeutics, Roche, Shionogi, and Terns. He is on the speakers’ bureau for Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare. He received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept. He holds intellectual property rights with Elsevier, Ltd. Ramon Bataller is on the speakers’ bureau for Abbvie and Gilead. Ulrich Beuers consults for CSL Behring. He is on the speakers’ bureau for Abacus and Zambon. Elisabetta Bugianesi advises Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, and Novo Nordisk. Helena Cortez-Pinto consults and received grants from Novo Nordisk and Roche. She received grants from Eisai, Gilead, GMP-Orphan, and Intercept. Kenneth Cusi Consults for Aligos, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Covance, Lilly, Madrigal, Myovant, Novo Nordisk, Prosciento, Sagimet, and Siemens. He received grants from Echosens, Inventiva, LabCorp, Nordic Biosciences, and Target NASH. Sven M. Francque consults and received grants from Astellas, Falk, GENFIT, Gilead, Glympse Bio, Janssen, Inventiva, Merck, Pfizer, and Roche. He consults for AbbVie., Actelion, Aelin Therapeutics, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Coherus, CSL Behring, Echosens, Eisai, ENYO, Galapagos, Galmed, Genetech, Intercept, Julius Clinical, Madrigal, Medimmune, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Promethera. Samer Gawrieh consults for Pfizer and TransMedics. He received grants from LiverIncytes, Viking, and Zydus. Manuel Romero-Gómez advises and received grants from Novo Nordisk and Siemens. He advises AbbVie., Alpha-sigma, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Intercept, Inventia, Kaleido, MSD, Pfizer, Prosciento, Rubió, Shionogi, Sobi, and Zydus. He received grants from Echosens and Theratechnologies. Cynthia D. Guy consults for 89Bio, CymaBay, HistoIndex, Madrigal, and NGM. Stephen Harrison consults, advises, is involved with trials, received grants, and owns stock in Akero, Galectin, GENFIT, Hepion, and NGM Bio. He consults, advises, is involved with trials, and received grants from Axcella, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, and Poxel. He consults, advises, received grants, and owns stock in NorthSea Therapeutics. He consults, advises, and is involved with trials for Terns. He consults, advises, and received grants from HighTide, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sagimet. He consults, advises, and owns stock in HistoIndex, Metacrine, and Sonic Incytes. He consults, received grants, and owns stock in Cirius. He consults, is involved with trials, and received grants from ENYO and Viking. He is involved with trials and received grants from Genentech. He consults and is involved with trials for Ionis. He consults and received grants from CiVi, CymaBay, Galmed, and Pfizer. He consults and owns stock in Hepta Bio. He consults and advises for Altimmune, Echosens North America, Foresite Labs, and Medpace. He advises and owns stock in ChronWell. He consults for AgomAb, Alentis, Aligos Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Blade, Bluejay, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Boxer Capital, CanFite BioPharma, the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation (CLDF), CohBar, Corcept, Fibronostics, Fortress Biotech, Galecto, Gelesis, GSK, GNS Healthcare, GRI Bio, Hepagene, Indalo, Inipharm, Innovate Biopharmaceuticals, Kowa Research Institute, Merck, MGGM, NeuroBo, Nutrasource, Perspectum, Piper Sandler, Prometic (now Liminal BioSciences), Ridgeline Therapeutics, Silverback, and Zafgen (now Larimar). He advises Arrowhead BVF Partners, Humana, and Pathai. He received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Conatus, Immuron, and Second Genome. Samuel Klein advises Alnylam, Altimmune, and Merck. Kris V. Kowdley advises, is on the speakers’ bureau, and received grants from Gilead and Intercept. He advises, received grants, and owns stock in Inipharm. He advises and received grants from 89bio, CymaBay, GENFIT, Ipsen, Madrigal, Mirum, NGM Bio, Pfizer, Pliant, and Zeds. He advises Enact, HighTide, and Protagonist. He is on the speakers’ bureau for AbbVie. He received grants from Boston Pharmaceuticals, Corcept, GSK, Hanmi, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Terns, and Viking. Jeffrey V. Lazarus consults for Novavax. He received grants from AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, and Roche Diagnostics. Rohit Loomba consults and received grants from Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galmed, Gilead, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, NGM Bio, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Terns. He consults and owns stock in 89Bio and Sagimet. Consults for Altimmune, Anylam, Amgen, CohBar, Glympse Bio, HighTide, Inipharm, Metacrine, Novartis, Regeneron, Theratechnologies, and Viking. He received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Galectin Therapeutics, Hanmi, and Sonic Incytes. He cofounded and owns stock in LipoNexus. Phillip N. Newsome consults, advises, is on the speakers’ bureau, and received grants from Novo Nordisk. He consults and advises Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GSK, Intercept, Madrigal, Pfizer, Poxel, and Sun Pharma. He is on the speakers’ bureau for AiCME. Elizabeth E. Powell advises and received grants from Novo Nordisk. Vlad Ratziu consults and received grants from Intercept. He consults for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eny, Madrigal, NorthSea, Novo Nordisk, E. Poxel, and Sagimet. He received grants from Gilead. Mary E. Rinella consults for Boehringer Ingelheim, CytoDyn, GSK, Novo Nordisk, HistoIndex, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM Bio, and Sonic Incytes. Michael Roden consults and received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk. He consults for Lilly. He is on the speakers’ bureau for AstraZeneca. Arun J. Sanyal consults and advises Avant Santé and AstraZeneca. He consults and received grants from Akero, Bristol Myers Squibb, Intercept, Lilly, Madrigal, and Novo Nordisk. He consults and owns stock in Rivus. He consults for AGED Diagnostics, Albireo, Alnylam, Altimmune, Boehringer Ingelhiem, 89Bio, Echosense, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, HistoIndex, Malinckrodt, Merck, NGM Bio, Novartis, PathAI, Pfizer, Poxel, Regeneron, Salix, Siemens, Surrozen, Takeda, Terns, and Zydus. He owns stock in Durect, Exhalenz, GENFIT, Indalo, Inversago, and Tiziana. He received royalties from Elsevier and Wolters Kluwer. Marcelo Silva consults, advises, and received grants from Zydus. He received grants from Inventiva and MSD. Dina Tiniakos consults for Clinnovate Health, ICON, Ionis, Inventiva, Merck, and Verily. Luca Valenti consults and received grants from Gilead. He consults for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Resalis Therapeutics. Miriam B. Vos consults and advises Thiogenesis. She consults and received grants from Target Real World Evidence. She consults and owns stock in Intercept. She consults for Albireo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Takeda. She received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Quest, and Sonic Incytes. Vincent Wai-Sun Wong consults and received grants from Gilead. He consults for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet, and TARGET PharmaSolutions. He owns stock in Illuminatio Medical Technology. Yusuf Yilmaz consults for Zydus. He advises Novo Nordisk. He is on the speakers’ bureau for Echosens. Zobair Younossi consults for Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Quest, Siemens, and Terns. The remaining authors have no conflicts to report., (Copyright © 2023 Mary E. Rinella, Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Vlad Ratziu, Sven M. Francque, Arun J. Sanyal, Fasiha Kanwal, Diana Romero, Manal F. Abdelmalek, Quentin M. Anstee, Juan Pablo Arab, Marco Arrese, Ramon Bataller, Ulrich Beuers, Jerome Boursier, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Christopher D. Byrne, Graciela E. Castro Narro, Abhijit Chowdhury, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Donna Cryer, Kenneth Cusi, Mohamed El-Kassas, Samuel Klein, Wayne Eskridge, Jiangao Fan, Samer Gawrieh, Cynthia D. Guy, Stephen A. Harrison, Seung Up Kim, Bart Koot, Marko Korenjak, Kris Kowdley, Florence Lacaille, Rohit Loomba, Robert Mitchell-Thain, Timothy R. Morgan, Elisabeth Powell, Michael Roden, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Marcelo Silva, Shivaram Prasad Singh, Silvia C. Sookoian, C. Wendy Spearman, Dina Tiniakos, Luca Valenti, Miriam B. Vos, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Stavra Xanthakos, Yusuf Yilmaz, Zobair Younossi, Ansley Hobbs, Marcela Villota-Rivas, Philip N. Newsome (senior), NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Sotrovimab 500 mg administered by a single intravenous (IV) infusion has been granted special approval for emergency use in Japan for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults and children aged ≥ 12 years weighing ≥ 40 kg. This Phase 1, single-dose study investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of IV or intramuscular (IM) sotrovimab 500 mg doses versus placebo in healthy Japanese and Caucasian volunteers., Methods: This was a two-part, Phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind study. In Part 1, participants received a single sotrovimab 500 mg IV infusion or matching placebo on Day 1. In Part 2, participants received a single sotrovimab 500 mg IM dose or matching placebo on Day 1, administered as two 4 mL injections., Results: There was no effect of ethnicity on the peak or total serum exposure of IV sotrovimab through Week 18; after adjusting for body weight, the point estimate and 90 % confidence interval for the ratio of total exposure between Japanese and Caucasian participants fell within conventional bioavailability bounds (80-125%). Geometric mean C max and AUC last following a single IM administration of sotrovimab were higher in Japanese participants compared with Caucasian participants, even after adjustment for body weight. Overall, a single IV or IM dose of sotrovimab was well tolerated by both Japanese and Caucasian participants., Conclusions: After adjusting for body weight, exposures following a single IV dose of sotrovimab 500 mg were similar between Japanese and Caucasian participants, and higher in Japanese participants following IM administration. Higher exposures were not associated with any safety signals., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04988152., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background & Aims: Pegbelfermin is a polyethylene glycol-conjugated analog of human fibroblast growth factor 21, a nonmitogenic hormone that regulates energy metabolism. This phase 2b study evaluated 48-week pegbelfermin treatment in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with compensated cirrhosis., Methods: FALCON 2 (NCT03486912) was a randomized (1:1:1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eligible adults had biopsy-confirmed NASH and stage 4 fibrosis. Pegbelfermin (10, 20, or 40 mg) or placebo was injected subcutaneously once weekly. The primary endpoint was 1 or more stages of improvement in the NASH Clinical Research Network fibrosis score without NASH worsening at week 48; pegbelfermin dose response was assessed using a Cochran-Armitage trend test across proportions (1-sided α = .05). Additional endpoints included histologic and noninvasive measures of steatosis, fibrosis, and liver injury/inflammation., Results: Overall, 155 patients were randomized, and 154 patients received treatment. At week 48, 24% to 28% of the pegbelfermin arms had primary endpoint responses vs 31% of the placebo arm (P = .361). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score improvements were more frequent with pegbelfermin vs placebo and were driven primarily by reduced lobular inflammation. Numerically higher proportions of the pegbelfermin arms had liver stiffness (magnetic resonance elastography) and steatosis (magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction) improvements vs placebo; these differences were not statistically significant. Mean N-terminal type III collagen propeptide, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase values were numerically lower in the 20- and/or 40-mg pegbelfermin arms compared with placebo. Serious adverse events were more frequent with pegbelfermin vs placebo, although none were treatment related. One patient (40-mg pegbelfermin) discontinued treatment because of a treatment-emergent adverse event (worsening ascites)., Conclusions: FALCON 2 did not meet its primary endpoint of 1 or more stages of improvement in the NASH Clinical Research Network fibrosis without NASH worsening assessed via biopsy. Pegbelfermin generally was well tolerated in this advanced NASH population., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Pegbelfermin is a polyethlene glycol-conjugated analog of human fibroblast growth factor 21, a nonmitogenic hormone that regulates energy metabolism. This phase 2b study evaluated 48-week pegbelfermin treatment in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and stage 3 (bridging) fibrosis., Methods: The FALCON 1 study (NCT03486899) was a multicenter, randomized (1:1:1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and stage 3 fibrosis (N = 197) received weekly subcutaneous pegbelfermin (10, 20, or 40 mg) or placebo injections for 48 weeks. The week 24 primary endpoint was a ≥1-point decrease in fibrosis score without NASH worsening or NASH improvement without fibrosis worsening; pegbelfermin dose response was assessed using a Cochran-Armitage trend test across proportions (1-sided α = 0.05). Secondary/exploratory endpoints included histological and noninvasive measures of steatosis, fibrosis, and liver injury/inflammation., Results: At week 24, the primary endpoint was met by 14% (placebo) vs 24%-31% (pegbelfermin arms); statistical significance was not reached due to lack of pegbelfermin dose response (P = .134). At weeks 24 and 48, more patients who received pegbelfermin had ≥30% relative reductions in hepatic fat fraction (magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction) vs placebo, although no differences reached statistical significance. In the pegbelfermin arms, improvements in liver fibrosis (magnetic resonance elastography and N-terminal type III collagen propeptide) and liver injury/inflammation (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase) were observed vs placebo. Adverse events occurred at similar frequencies across arms. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed., Conclusions: The FALCON 1 study did not meet its primary endpoint; a ≥1-point decrease in fibrosis score without NASH worsening or NASH improvement without fibrosis worsening assessed via biopsy. Pegbelfermin was generally well tolerated during 48 weeks of treatment., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Liver histopathologic assessment is the accepted surrogate endpoint in NASH trials; however, the scoring of NASH Clinical Research Network (CRN) histologic parameters is limited by intraobserver and interobserver variability. We designed a consensus panel approach to minimize variability when using this scoring system. We assessed agreement between readers, estimated linear weighted kappas between 2 panels, compared them with published pairwise kappa estimates, and addressed how agreement or disagreement might impact the precision and validity of the surrogate efficacy endpoint in NASH trials., Methods: Two panels, each comprising 3 liver fellowship-trained pathologists who underwent NASH histology training, independently evaluated scanned whole slide images, scoring fibrosis, inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning, and steatosis from baseline and month 18 biopsies for 100 patients from the precirrhotic NASH study REGENERATE. The consensus score for each parameter was defined as agreement by ≥2 pathologists. If consensus was not reached, all 3 pathologists read the slide jointly to achieve a consensus score., Results: Between the 2 panels, the consensus was 97%-99% for steatosis, 91%-93% for fibrosis, 88%-92% for hepatocyte ballooning, and 84%-91% for inflammation. Linear weighted kappa scores between panels were similar to published NASH CRN values., Conclusions: A panel of 3 trained pathologists independently scoring 4 NASH CRN histology parameters produced high consensus rates. Interpanel kappa values were comparable to NASH CRN metrics, supporting the accuracy and reproducibility of this method. The high concordance for fibrosis scoring was reassuring, as fibrosis is predictive of liver-specific outcomes and all-cause mortality., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is closely associated with other features of the metabolic syndrome such as type 2 diabetes. The progression of the disease may lead to liver fibrosis, which is the main predictor of major adverse liver outcomes. Insulin resistance plays a major role in the pathogenesis of the disease. A component of fasting hyperinsulinemia is a failure of the liver to adjust the peripheral level of insulin due to reduced clearance. The associated fasting hyperinsulinemia has been independently associated as a predictor of major adverse liver outcomes and major adverse cardiovascular events. In this review, we discuss the potential mechanism and entanglement between liver fibrosis and hyperinsulinemia, and we hypothesize that the measure of fasting insulin could become a hepatic functional test within the armamentarium of noninvasive tests for the assessment of Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favour of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panellists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and non-stigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification., (Copyright © 2023 Mary E. Rinella, Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Vlad Ratziu, Sven M. Francque, Arun J. Sanyal, Fasiha Kanwal, Diana Romero, Manal F. Abdelmalek, Quentin M. Anstee, Juan Pablo Arab, Marco Arrese, Ramon Bataller, Ulrich Beuers, Jerome Boursier, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Christopher Byrne, Graciela E. Castro Narro, Abhijit Chowdhury, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Donna Cryer, Kenneth Cusi, Mohamed El-Kassas, Samuel Klein, Wayne Eskridge, Jiangao Fan, Samer Gawrieh, Cynthia D. Guy, Stephen A. Harrison, Seung Up Kim, Bart Koot, Marko Korenjak, Kris Kowdley, Florence Lacaille, Rohit Loomba, Robert Mitchell-Thain, Timothy R. Morgan, Elisabeth Powell, Michael Roden, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Marcelo Silva, Shivaram Prasad Singh, Silvia C. Sookoian, C. Wendy Spearman, Dina Tiniakos, Luca Valenti, Miriam B. Vos, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Stavra Xanthakos, Yusuf Yilmaz, Zobair Younossi, Ansley Hobbs, Marcela Villota-Rivas, Philip N. Newsome, NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), and Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, A.C. Published by Wolters Kluwer/Elsevier B.V/Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Background: Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) regulates metabolism and protects cells against stress. Efruxifermin is a bivalent Fc-FGF21 analogue that replicates FGF21 agonism of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1c, 2c, or 3c. The aim of this phase 2b study was to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and moderate (F2) or severe (F3) fibrosis., Methods: HARMONY is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 96-week, phase 2b trial that was initiated at 41 clinics in the USA. Adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH, defined by a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) of 4 or higher and scores of 1 or higher in each of steatosis, ballooning, and lobular inflammation, with histological stage F2 or F3 fibrosis, were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via an interactive response system, to receive placebo or efruxifermin (28 mg or 50 mg), subcutaneously once weekly. Patients, investigators, pathologists, site staff, and the sponsor were masked to group assignments during the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with improvement in fibrosis of at least 1 stage and no worsening of NASH, based on analyses of baseline and week 24 biopsies (liver biopsy analysis set [LBAS]). A sensitivity analysis evaluated the endpoint in the full analysis set (FAS), for which patients with missing biopsies were considered non-responders. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04767529, and is ongoing., Findings: Between March 22, 2021, and Feb 7, 2022, 747 patients were assessed for eligibility and 128 patients (mean age 54·7 years [SD 10·4]; 79 [62%] female and 49 male [38%]; 118 [92%] white; and 56 [41%] Hispanic or Latino) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=43), efruxifermin 28 mg (n=42; two randomised patients were not dosed because of an administrative error), or efruxifermin 50 mg (n=43). In the LBAS (n=113), eight (20%) of 41 patients in the placebo group had an improvement in fibrosis of at least 1 stage and no worsening of NASH by week 24 versus 15 (39%) of 38 patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group (risk ratio [RR] 2·3 [95% CI 1·1-4·8]; p=0·025) and 14 (41%) of 34 patients in the efruxifermin 50 mg group (2·2 [1·0-5·0]; p=0·036). Based on the FAS (n=128), eight (19%) of 43 patients in the placebo group met this endpoint versus 15 (36%) of 42 in the efruxifermin 28 mg group (RR 2·2 [95% CI 1·0-4·8]; p=0·033) and 14 (33%) of 43 in the efruxifermin 50 mg group (1·9 [0·8-4·3]; p=0·123). The most frequent efruxifermin-related adverse events were diarrhoea (16 [40%] of 40 patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group and 17 [40%] of 43 patients in efruxifermin 50 mg group vs eight [19%] of 43 patients in the placebo group; all events except one were grade 1-2) and nausea (11 [28%] patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group and 18 [42%] patients in the efruxifermin 50 mg group vs ten [23%] patients in the placebo group; all grade 1-2). Five patients (two in the 28 mg group and three in the 50 mg group) discontinued due to adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients in the 50 mg group; one was defined as drug related (ulcerative esophagitis in a participant with a history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease). No deaths occurred., Interpretation: Efruxifermin improved liver fibrosis and resolved NASH over 24 weeks in patients with F2 or F3 fibrosis, with acceptable tolerability, supporting further assessment in phase 3 trials., Funding: Akero Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The presence or absence of awns-whether wheat heads are 'bearded' or 'smooth' - is the most visible phenotype distinguishing wheat cultivars. Previous studies suggest that awns may improve yields in heat or water-stressed environments, but the exact contribution of awns to yield differences remains unclear. Here we leverage historical phenotypic, genotypic, and climate data for wheat (Triticum aestivum) to estimate the yield effects of awns under different environmental conditions over a 12-year period in the southeastern USA. Lines were classified as awned or awnless based on sequence data, and observed heading dates were used to associate grain fill periods of each line in each environment with climatic data and grain yield. In most environments, awn suppression was associated with higher yields, but awns were associated with better performance in heat-stressed environments more common at southern locations. Wheat breeders in environments where awns are only beneficial in some years may consider selection for awned lines to reduce year-to-year yield variability, and with an eye towards future climates., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology 2023.)

Background & Aims: Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a first-in-class farnesoid X receptor agonist and antifibrotic agent in development for the treatment of pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to validate the original 18-month liver biopsy analysis from the phase III REGENERATE trial of OCA for the treatment of NASH with a consensus panel analysis, provide additional histology data in a larger population, and evaluate safety from >8,000 total patient-years' exposure with nearly 1,000 participants receiving study drug for >4 years., Methods: Digitized whole-slide images were evaluated independently by panels of three pathologists using the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system. Primary endpoints were (1) ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH or (2) NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Safety was assessed by laboratory values and adverse events., Results: Prespecified efficacy analyses included 931 participants. The proportion of participants achieving a ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH was 22.4% for OCA 25 mg vs. 9.6% for placebo (p <0.0001). More participants receiving OCA 25 mg vs. placebo achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis (6.5% vs. 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.093). Histology data in a larger population of 1,607 participants supported these results. Safety data included 2,477 participants. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and deaths was not substantively different across treatment groups. Pruritus was the most common TEAE. Rates of adjudicated hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular events were low and similar across treatment groups., Conclusions: These results confirm the antifibrotic effect of OCA 25 mg. OCA was generally well tolerated over long-term dosing. These data support a positive benefit:risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH., Impact and Implications: Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often have liver scarring (fibrosis), which causes an increased risk of liver-related illness and death. Preventing progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis or reversing fibrosis are the main goals of drug development for NASH. In this clinical trial of obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with NASH (REGENERATE), we reaffirmed our previous results demonstrating that OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis using a more rigorous consensus panel analysis of liver biopsies taken at month 18. We also showed that OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum liver biochemistries and liver stiffness measurements compared with placebo, even in participants in whom histologic fibrosis did not change at 18 months, providing evidence that the benefit of OCA extends beyond what is captured by the ordinal NASH CRN scoring system. OCA was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile supporting a positive benefit: risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

S100 proteins are a subfamily of EF-hand calcium-binding proteins found primarily in vertebrate animals. They are distinguished by binding of transition metals and functioning in both the intracellular and extracellular milieu. S100A7 functions in the protection of the skin and mucous membranes and is a biomarker in inflammatory skin disease. A recent study of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection revealed that human but not murine S100A7 could be used to evade host nutritional immunity. To understand the molecular basis for this difference, we carried out a comparative analysis of the physical and structural properties of human and murine S100A7. The X-ray crystal structure of Ca 2+ -loaded mouse S100A7 (mS100A7) was determined to 1.69 Å resolution, and Ca 2+ -induced conformational changes were assessed by NMR. Unlike human S100A7 (hS100A7), which exhibits conformational changes in response to binding of Ca 2+ , no significant changes in mS100A7 were detected. Dynamic light scattering, circular dichroism, and a competition chelator assay were used to compare the Zn 2+ affinity and the effects of ion binding on mS100A7 versus hS100A7. Alignment of their sequences revealed a substantial difference in the C-terminal region, which is an important mediator of protein-protein interactions, suggesting a rationale for the specificity of N. gonorrhoeae for hS100A7. These data, along with more detailed analysis of S100A7 sequence conservation across different species, support the proposal that, although hS100A7 is highly conserved in many mammals, the murine protein is a distinct ortholog. Our results highlight the potential limitations of using mouse models for studying bacterial infections in humans., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a progressive liver disease with no approved treatment. MAESTRO-NAFLD-1 was a 52-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluating the safety of resmetirom in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and presumed NASH. Patients were randomized to three double-blind arms (100 mg resmetirom (n = 325), 80 mg resmetirom (n = 327) or placebo (n = 320)) or open-label 100 mg resmetirom (n = 171). The primary end point was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) over 52 weeks and key secondary end points were LDL-C, apoB, triglycerides (over 24 weeks), hepatic fat (over 16 and 52 weeks) and liver stiffness (over 52 weeks). Resmetirom was safe and well tolerated. TEAEs occurred in 86.5% (open-label 100 mg resmetirom), 86.1% (100 mg resmetirom), 88.4% (80 mg resmetirom) and 81.8% (placebo) of patients. TEAEs in excess of placebo included diarrhea and nausea at the initiation of treatment. Key secondary end points included least square means difference from placebo at 80 mg, 100 mg resmetirom: LDL-C (-11.1%, -12.6%), apoB (-15.6%, -18.0%), triglycerides (-15.4%, -20.4%), 16-week hepatic fat (-34.9%, -38.6%), (P < 0.0001) and liver stiffness (-1.02, -1.70) and 52-week hepatic fat (-28.8, -33.9). These findings demonstrate resmetirom was safe and well tolerated in adults with presumed NASH, supporting a role for further clinical development. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04197479 )., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: An approved therapy for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis remains a major unmet medical need., Aim: To investigate the histological and metabolic benefits of pegozafermin, a glycoPEGylated FGF21 analogue, in subjects with biopsy-confirmed NASH., Methods: This proof-of-concept, open-label, single-cohort study, part 2 of a phase 1b/2a clinical trial, was conducted at 16 centres in the United States. Adults (age 21-75 years) with NASH (stage 2 or 3 fibrosis, NAS≥4) and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) ≥8% received subcutaneous pegozafermin 27 mg once weekly for 20 weeks. Primary outcomes were improvements in liver histology, and safety and tolerability., Results: Of 20 enrolled subjects, 19 completed the study. Twelve subjects (63%) met the primary endpoint of ≥2-point improvement in NAFLD activity score with ≥1-point improvement in ballooning or lobular inflammation and no worsening of fibrosis. Improvement of fibrosis without worsening of NASH was observed in 26% of subjects, and NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis in 32%. Least-squares mean relative change from baseline in MRI-PDFF was -64.7% (95% CI: -71.7, -57.7; p < 0.0001). Significant improvements from baseline were also seen in serum aminotransferases, noninvasive fibrosis tests, serum lipids, glycaemic control and body weight. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 18 subjects (90%). The most frequently reported AEs were mild/moderate nausea and diarrhoea. There were no serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, or deaths., Conclusions: Pegozafermin treatment for 20 weeks had beneficial effects on hepatic and metabolic parameters and was well tolerated in subjects with NASH., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT04048135., (© 2023 The Authors. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Pegozafermin is a long-acting glycopegylated (pegylated with the use of site-specific glycosyltransferases) fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) analogue in development for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and severe hypertriglyceridemia. The efficacy and safety of pegozafermin in patients with biopsy-proven noncirrhotic NASH are not well established., Methods: In this phase 2b, multicenter, double-blind, 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and stage F2 or F3 (moderate or severe) fibrosis to receive subcutaneous pegozafermin at a dose of 15 mg or 30 mg weekly or 44 mg once every 2 weeks or placebo weekly or every 2 weeks. The two primary end points were an improvement in fibrosis (defined as reduction by ≥1 stage, on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher stages indicating greater severity), with no worsening of NASH, at 24 weeks and NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis at 24 weeks. Safety was also assessed., Results: Among the 222 patients who underwent randomization, 219 received pegozafermin or placebo. The percentage of patients who met the criteria for fibrosis improvement was 7% in the pooled placebo group, 22% in the 15-mg pegozafermin group (difference vs. placebo, 14 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9 to 38), 26% in the 30-mg pegozafermin group (difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 5 to 32; P = 0.009), and 27% in the 44-mg pegozafermin group (difference, 20 percentage points; 95% CI, 5 to 35; P = 0.008). The percentage of patients who met the criteria for NASH resolution was 2% in the placebo group, 37% in the 15-mg pegozafermin group (difference vs. placebo, 35 percentage points; 95% CI, 10 to 59), 23% in the 30-mg pegozafermin group (difference, 21 percentage points; 95% CI, 9 to 33), and 26% in the 44-mg pegozafermin group (difference, 24 percentage points; 95% CI, 10 to 37). The most common adverse events associated with pegozafermin therapy were nausea and diarrhea., Conclusions: In this phase 2b trial, treatment with pegozafermin led to improvements in fibrosis. These results support the advancement of pegozafermin into phase 3 development. (Funded by 89bio; ENLIVEN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04929483.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background & Aims: NIS4® is a blood-based non-invasive test designed to effectively rule in/rule out at-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), defined as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 and significant fibrosis (stage ≥2), among patients with metabolic risk factors. Robustness of non-invasive test scores across characteristics of interest including age, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and sex, and optimised analytical aspects are critical for large-scale implementation in clinical practice. We developed and validated NIS2+™, an optimisation of NIS4®, specifically designed to improve score robustness., Methods: A well-balanced training cohort (n = 198) included patients from the GOLDEN-505 trial. The validation (n = 684) and test (n = 2,035) cohorts included patients from the RESOLVE-IT trial. Well-matched subgroups were created to avoid potential confounding effects during modelling and analysis of score robustness. Models were trained using logistic regressions for at-risk NASH detection and compared using Bayesian information criteria. Performance of NIS2+™ was compared with that of NIS4®, Fibrosis-4, and alanine aminotransferase using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and robustness was analysed through score distribution., Results: Using the training cohort to compare all combinations of NIS4® biomarkers, NIS2 (miR-34a-5p, YKL-40) was identified as the best combination of parameters. To correct for the sex effect on miR-34a-5p (validation cohort), sex and sex ∗ miR-34a-5p parameters were added, creating NIS2+™. In the test cohort, NIS2+™ exhibited a statistically higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.813) vs. NIS4® (0.792; p = 0.0002), Fibrosis-4 (0.653; p <0.0001), and alanine aminotransferase (0.699; p <0.0001). NIS2+™ scores were not affected by age, sex, BMI, or type 2 diabetes mellitus status, providing robust clinical performances irrespective of patient characteristics., Conclusion: NIS2+™ constitutes a robust optimisation of NIS4® technology for the detection of at-risk NASH., Impact and Implications: The development of non-invasive tests for accurate, large-scale detection of patients with at-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH; defined as NASH with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 and fibrosis stage ≥2) - who are at higher risk for disease progression and for developing liver-related life-threatening outcomes - is critical for identifying this patient population in the clinical setting and improving the screening process of NASH clinical trials. We report the development and validation of NIS2+™, a diagnostic test designed as an optimisation of NIS4® technology, a blood-based panel currently used to detect at-risk NASH in patients with metabolic risk factors. NIS2+™ showed improved performance for the detection of at-risk NASH compared with NIS4® and other non-invasive liver tests that was not impacted by patients' characteristics of interest, such as age, sex, type 2 diabetes mellitus, BMI, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension. This makes NIS2+™ a robust and reliable tool for the diagnosis of at-risk NASH among patients with metabolic risk factors, and an effective candidate for large-scale implementation in clinical practice and clinical trials., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis to establish stiffness cut-off values for magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in staging liver fibrosis and to assess potential confounding factors., Methods: A systematic review of the literature identified studies reporting MRE data in patients with NAFLD. Data were obtained from the corresponding authors. The pooled diagnostic cut-off value for the various fibrosis stages was determined in a two-stage meta-analysis. Multilevel modelling methods were used to analyse potential confounding factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of MRE in staging liver fibrosis., Results: Eight independent cohorts comprising 798 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for MRE in detecting significant fibrosis was 0.92 (sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 89%). For advanced fibrosis, the AUROC was 0.92 (sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 88%). For cirrhosis, the AUROC was 0.94 (sensitivity, 88%, specificity, 89%). Cut-offs were defined to explore concordance between MRE and histopathology: ≥F2, 3.14 kPa (pretest probability, 39.4%); ≥F3, 3.53 kPa (pretest probability, 24.1%); and F4, 4.45 kPa (pretest probability, 8.7%). In generalized linear mixed model analysis, histological steatohepatitis with higher inflammatory activity (odds ratio 2.448, 95% CI 1.180-5.079, p <0.05) and high gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) concentration (>120U/L) (odds ratio 3.388, 95% CI 1.577-7.278, p <0.01] were significantly associated with elevated liver stiffness, and thus affecting accuracy in staging early fibrosis (F0-F1). Steatosis, as measured by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction, and body mass index(BMI) were not confounders., Conclusions: MRE has excellent diagnostic performance for significant, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD. Elevated inflammatory activity and GGT level may lead to overestimation of early liver fibrosis, but anthropometric measures such as BMI or the degree of steatosis do not., Impact and Implications: This individual patient data meta-analysis of eight international cohorts, including 798 patients, demonstrated that MRE achieves excellent diagnostic accuracy for significant, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD. Cut-off values (significant fibrosis, 3.14 kPa; advanced fibrosis, 3.53 kPa; and cirrhosis, 4.45 kPa) were established. Elevated inflammatory activity and gamma-glutamyltransferase level may affect the diagnostic accuracy of MRE, leading to overestimation of liver fibrosis in early stages. We observed no impact of diabetes, obesity, or any other metabolic disorder on the diagnostic accuracy of MRE., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: The prevalence of NAFLD is increasing globally and on a path to becoming the most frequent cause of chronic liver disease. Strategies for the prevention and treatment of NAFLD are urgently needed., Approach and Results: A 6-month prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily NRPT (commercially known as Basis, a combination of nicotinamide riboside and pterostilbene) supplementation in 111 adults with NAFLD. The study consisted of three arms: placebo, recommended daily dose of NRPT (NRPT 1×), and a double dose of NRPT (NRPT 2×). NRPT appeared safe and well tolerated. At the end of the study, no significant change was seen in the primary endpoint of hepatic fat fraction with respect to placebo. However, among prespecified secondary outcomes, a time-dependent decrease in the circulating levels of the liver enzymes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) was observed in the NRPT 1× group, and this decrease was significant with respect to placebo. Furthermore, a significant decrease in the circulating levels of the toxic lipid ceramide 14:0 was also observed in the NRPT 1× group versus placebo, and this decrease was associated with a decrease in ALT in individuals of this group. A dose-dependent effect was not observed with respect to ALT, GGT, or ceramide 14:0 in the NRPT 2× group., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that NRPT at the recommended dose is safe and may hold promise in lowering markers of hepatic inflammation in patients with NAFLD., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: The MRI-AST (MAST) score accurately identifies patients with at-risk nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, defined as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score ≥4 and fibrosis stage ≥2 at highest risk for disease progression. It is important to determine the robustness of the MAST score in predicting major adverse liver outcomes (MALO), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver transplant, and death., Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease from a tertiary care center who underwent magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction, magnetic resonance elastography, and laboratory testing within 6 months from 2013 to 2022. Other causes of chronic liver disease were excluded. Hazard ratios between logit MAST and MALO (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or bleeding esophageal varices), liver transplant, HCC, or liver-related death were computed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. We computed the hazard ratio of MALO or death associated with MAST scores 0.165-0.242 and 0.242-1.000, using MAST scores 0.000-0.165 as the reference group., Results: Among 346 total patients, average age was 58.8 years with 52.9% females and 34.4% with type 2 diabetes. Average alanine aminotransferase was 50.7 IU/L (24.3-60.0 IU/L), aspartate aminotransferase was 38.05 IU/L (22.00-41.00 IU/L), platelets were 242.9 × 10 9 /L (193.8-290.0 × 10 9 /L), proton density fat fraction was 12.90% (5.90%-18.22%), and liver stiffness on magnetic resonance elastography was 2.75 kPa (2.07-2.90 kPa). Median follow-up was 29.5 months. Fourteen had adverse outcomes, including 10 MALO, 1 HCC, 1 liver transplant, and 2 liver-related deaths. The Cox regression of MAST versus adverse event rate had a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.54; P < .0001) for each 1 logit unit increases in MAST. The corresponding Harrell concordance statistic (C statistic) was 0.919 (95% confidence interval, 0.865-0.953). The MAST score ranges of 0.165-0.242 and 0.242-1.0, respectively, had adverse event rate hazard ratio of 7.75 (1.40-42.9; P = .0189) and 22.11 (6.59-74.2; P < .0000) relative to MAST 0-0.165., Conclusions: The MAST score noninvasively identifies at-risk nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and accurately predicts MALO, HCC, liver transplant, and liver-related death., (Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The reference standard for detecting non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and staging fibrosis-liver biopsy-is invasive and resource intensive. Non-invasive biomarkers are urgently needed, but few studies have compared these biomarkers in a single cohort. As part of the Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis (LITMUS) project, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 17 biomarkers and multimarker scores in detecting NASH and clinically significant fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and identify their optimal cutoffs as screening tests in clinical trial recruitment., Methods: This was a comparative diagnostic accuracy study in people with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD from 13 countries across Europe, recruited between Jan 6, 2010, and Dec 29, 2017, from the LITMUS metacohort of the prospective European NAFLD Registry. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with paired liver biopsy and serum samples were eligible; those with excessive alcohol consumption or evidence of other chronic liver diseases were excluded. The diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with liver histology as the reference standard and compared with the Fibrosis-4 index for liver fibrosis (FIB-4) in the same subgroup. Target conditions were the presence of NASH with clinically significant fibrosis (ie, at-risk NASH; NAFLD Activity Score ≥4 and F≥2) or the presence of advanced fibrosis (F≥3), analysed in all participants with complete data. We identified thres holds for each biomarker for reducing the number of biopsy-based screen failures when recruiting people with both NASH and clinically significant fibrosis for future trials., Findings: Of 1430 participants with NAFLD in the LITMUS metacohort with serum samples, 966 (403 women and 563 men) were included after all exclusion criteria had been applied. 335 (35%) of 966 participants had biopsy-confirmed NASH and clinically significant fibrosis and 271 (28%) had advanced fibrosis. For people with NASH and clinically significant fibrosis, no single biomarker or multimarker score significantly reached the predefined AUC 0·80 acceptability threshold (AUCs ranging from 0·61 [95% CI 0·54-0·67] for FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter to 0·81 [0·75-0·86] for SomaSignal), with accuracy mostly similar to FIB-4. Regarding detection of advanced fibrosis, SomaSignal (AUC 0·90 [95% CI 0·86-0·94]), ADAPT (0·85 [0·81-0·89]), and FibroScan liver stiffness measurement (0·83 [0·80-0·86]) reached acceptable accuracy. With 11 of 17 markers, histological screen failure rates could be reduced to 33% in trials if only people who were marker positive had a biopsy for evaluating eligibility. The best screening performance for NASH and clinically significant fibrosis was observed for SomaSignal (number needed to test [NNT] to find one true positive was four [95% CI 4-5]), then ADAPT (six [5-7]), MACK-3 (seven [6-8]), and PRO-C3 (nine [7-11])., Interpretation: None of the single markers or multimarker scores achieved the predefined acceptable AUC for replacing biopsy in detecting people with both NASH and clinically significant fibrosis. However, several biomarkers could be applied in a prescreening strategy in clinical trial recruitment. The performance of promising markers will be further evaluated in the ongoing prospective LITMUS study cohort., Funding: The Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests QMA is the coordinator of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 (IMI2) LITMUS consortium funded by the IMI2 Program of the EU (777377) and is a Newcastle National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre investigator. The multistakeholder LITMUS consortium includes industry partners and received funding from the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. QMA also declares research grant funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Glympse Bio, Intercept, Novartis, and Pfizer; is a consultant on behalf of Newcastle University to Alimentiv, Akero, AstraZeneca, Axcella, 89Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galmed, Genfit, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Hanmi, HistoIndex, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, Medpace, Merck, NGMBio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Poxel, Resolution Therapeutics, Roche, Ridgeline Therapeutics, RTI International, Shionogi, and Terns; has received speaker fees from Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare; is on the North Sea Therapeutics Data Safety and Monitoring Committee at Medpace on behalf of Newcastle University; and has received royalties from Elsevier. JB declares research grant funding from Echosens, Intercept, Inventiva, and Siemens; consulting fees from Echosens, Intercept, and Siemens; speaker fees from Gilead, Intercept, Lilly, and Siemens; and is a member of advisory boards of Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Intercept, Novo Nordisk, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. DT declares grants from and contracts with Histoindex; consulting fees from Alimentiv, Clinnovate Health UK, Allergan, Cirius Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, ICON Clinical Research, and Ionis Pharmaceuticals; and was the past President of the European Society of Pathology (unpaid). PB is the owner and Director of Liverpat. AG declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and research grants from Falk and Intercept; consulting fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead, Intercept, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Sequana; research fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Burger Stein, CSL Behring, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, Mert, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, and Sequana; travel and meeting support from Intercept, Gilead, AbbVie, and Falk; and is a member of an advisory board of Falk. SF has a Senior Clinical Investigator fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (1802154N); declares grants to his institution (University of Antwerp, Belgium) from Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Roche, and Bristol-Meyers Squibb; has been a consultant to Roche, Intercept, Gilead Sciences, Echosens, Allergan, Genentech, AbbVie, Novo Nordisk, Bayer, Novartis, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galmed, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Promethera, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Coherus, Actelion Madrigal, Astellas, Julius Clinical, Genfit, NGM Bio, and Inventiva; and has been lecturer for AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Genfit, and Gilead Sciences. MA declares research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, and AstraZeneca and consulting fees from Intercept and AstraZeneca. GP declares support from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Takeda; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Roche; speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and Takeda; and travel support from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Ipsen, Janssen, and Novo Nordisk. HC-P declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project; consulting fees from Intercept, Novo Nordisk, and Orphalan; and speaker fees from Eisai and Roche Portugal. J-FD is a member of the advisory committees of Alentis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Enyo, Esai, Falk, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Ipsen, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Roche; declares travel and meeting support from Gilead and speaking and teaching fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, and Roche; has received fees from the journal GUT as an Associate Editor and Uptodate; and is President of the Swiss NASH Foundation and the Swiss Foundation against Liver Cancer. DJL declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and Nordic Bioscience and has stock in Nordic Bioscience. SAH declares grants from Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Enyo Pharma, Galectin, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics; consulting and speaker fees from AgomAB, Akero Therapeutics, Alentis Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Altimmune, Axcella Health, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Riley FBR, BVF Partners, Cohbar, Canfite, Corcept Therapeutics, Cymabay, Echosens North America, Enyo Pharma, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress Biotech, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Genius Group, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, HistoIndex, Inipharm, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, Microba, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, Nutrasource, Perspectum Diagnostics, Piper, Sandler, Poxel, Prometic Pharma, Ridgeline, Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes, Medical, Terns, and Viking Therapeutics; is a member of advisory boards of 89 Bio, Akero Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella Health, Chronwell, CiVi, Cymabay, Echosens North America, Foresite Labs, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, HistoIndex, Indalo, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Prometic Pharma, Ridgeline, Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes Medical, Terns, and Theratechnologies; has stock in Akero Therapeutics, Chronwell, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Sonic Incytes, and Medical Corp; and declares consultancy services to Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Enyo Pharma, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics. YC is an employee of Eli Lilly and the company and hold stocks and shares in Eli Lilly. JFC declares support from Oxford National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre; consulting fees from Intercept and Alnylam; speaker fees from AstraZeneca; and is a member of an advisory board of Intercept. MP declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and grants from Cancer Research UK (C30358/A29725); has a patent for medical imaging (WO2015155521A1); and is a shareholder in Perspectum. HY-J declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project; grants from Academy of Finland, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and EVO foundation; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from Novo Nordisk and GlaxoSmithKline; and is a member of advisory boards of Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eli Lilly, and Hamni. JC declares grants and research support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals; consultant fees from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Shionogi, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, and Alexion; speaker support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Shionogi, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Celgene; meeting and travel support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and is President of the Spanish Society of Digestive Pathology. MK declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and Nordic Bioscience. He is a Nordic Bioscience stock share holder. RO is an employee of SomaLogic; declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project (SomaLogic funded the SomaScan proteomic assay results as a contribution to LITMUS); is on the patent application of SomaLogic for NASH biomarkers; and has stock in SomaLogic. RT is an employee of and holds stock in AstraZeneca, Sweden. KD is an employee of Eli Lilly and the company and hold stocks and shares in Eli Lilly. CY is an employee and stock and share holder of Pfizer. CB is a former employee of Novartis Pharma and declares financial support from Novartis Pharma; has pending patents for treatment of NASH (Novartis); and has stock in Novartis Pharma and Merck. ME is a member of the advisory board of AMRA Medical. GPA declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and consulting fees from Clinicpace, Servier Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, NuCana, AstraZeneca, and Benevolent AI. JMS declares grants from Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Nordic Bioscience, and Siemens Healthcare; consulting fees from Apollo Endosurgery, Albireo Pharma, Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Heel, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Julius Clinical, Madrigal, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nordic Bioscience, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Shinogi, Siemens Healthcare, and Summit Clinical Research; speaker fees from Apollo Endosurgery, MedPublico, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and is a member of advisory boards of Novo Nordisk and Boehringer Ingelheim. EB declares consulting fees from Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept; speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Intercept, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; and is a member of advisory boards of Novo Nordisk and Intercept. MR-G declares grants from Siemens, Gilead, and Intercept; consulting fees from AbbVie, Alpha-sigma, Allergen, AstraZeneca, Inventia, Kaleido, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Axcella, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Gilead; speaker fees from Inventia, Sobi, Novo Nordisk, Rubio, and Shionogi; meeting and travel support from Abbvie and Gilead; and is a member of an advisory board of Galmed. VR declares grants from Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals and consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Galmed, Novo Nordisk, Prosciento, Terns, NorthSea Therapeutics, Enyo, Sagimet, NGM Pharmaceuticals, and Madrigal. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)