1. Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization of Piperacillin in Infants and Children with Pneumonia.
- Author
-
Jirasomprasert T, Tian LY, You DP, Wang YK, Dong L, Zhang YH, Hao GX, van den Anker J, Wu YE, Tang BH, Zhao W, and Zheng Y
- Abstract
Objective: We aimed to determine the piperacillin disposition and optimize the dosing regimens for infants and children with pneumonia., Methods: An opportunistic sampling strategy was used in this pharmacokinetic study. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to measure the concentrations of piperacillin in plasma samples. A population pharmacokinetic model was conducted using NONMEM., Results: The pharmacokinetic data of 90 samples from 64 infants and children with pneumonia (age range: 0.09-1.72 years for infants and 2.12-11.10 years for children) were available. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination was the most suitable model to describe the population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin. A covariate analysis indicated that body weight and age were significant factors affecting clearance. Monte Carlo simulations showed that a 50-mg/kg every 8 h or every 12 h dosing regimen results in underdosing. Results both in infants and children showed that an extended infusion (3 h) of various dosing regimens (80, 100, or 130 mg/kg) three times daily or a 300-mg/kg continuous infusion can reach a therapeutic level based on the chosen target for the probability of target attainment threshold of 70%, 80%, and 90% at minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints of 8 mg/L and 16 mg/L., Conclusions: A population pharmacokinetic model was obtained to evaluate the disposition of piperacillin, and the optimal dosing regimens were provided for use in infants and children with pneumonia., Competing Interests: Declarations. Funding: This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2706100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82173897), the Distinguished Young and Middle-aged Scholar of Shandong University, and the Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province (tstp20230660). Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests: Totsapol Jirasomprasert, Li-Yuan Tian, Dian-Ping You, Ya-Kun Wang, Lei Dong, Ya-Hui Zhang, Guo-Xiang Hao, John van den Anker, Yue-E Wu, Bo-Hao Tang, Wei Zhao, and Yi Zheng have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article. Ethics Approval: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee. Consent to Participate: Written informed consent was obtained from all parents of the children included in the study. Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Code Availability: The research code is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Authors’ Contributions: TJ analyzed and interpreted the data for the work, drafted the initial manuscript, and revised the manuscript. L-YT, D-PY, Y-KW, and LD collected the clinical data. G-XH and Y-HZ determined the samples. JvdA and Y-EW provided advice and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. B-HT, WZ, and YZ contributed equally to the design of the work, supervised the data collection, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF