Search

Background: Malignant hypertension has not disappeared and remains the most severe form of hypertension. More than 100 years after its description, many points remain unanswered. Mechanisms, definitions, and optimal treatment are still controversial. In 2019, we decided to launch a prospective multicentre multidisciplinary cohort in France to try to fill these gaps., Method: This study aimed to describe the baseline characteristics of the first 302 included patients and compared these data to already published cohorts. We included patients with severe hypertension associated with severe hypertensive retinopathy and patients filling the HYP MOD (HYPertension MultiOrgan Damage) definition from a broad range of departments (cardiology, nephrology, neurology intensive care unit, emergency department, internal medicine). We collected clinical, biological, imaging, and target organ damage data at admission, along with social and demographic data. We also recorded diagnostic and therapeutic management, adverse events during hospitalization, and characteristics at discharge., Results: We enrolled 302 patients in 32 months (105/year) among 40 centres and different specialties. They mainly included young men (68%, mean age 48.7 ± 14.5 years). Target organ damage involved the eye in 86.7% of patients, kidney in 58.6%, heart in 50%, brain in 32.8%, and Thrombotic Microangiopathy stigmata in 15.6%. Patients with severe retinopathy shared characteristics similar to those included in the most important cohorts already published. We also reported several additional subgroups of interest: one-third of our patients were less than 40 years old, one-third were of non-European origin, 14.3% were included through the multiorgan damage definition, without fundus severe injuries, 22.8% were treated without the use of IV therapy, 40.9% had normal or low renin level, and almost all patients were not on antihypertensive therapy at the time of the enrolment., Conclusion: These preliminary findings already challenge long-standing dogma, raise numerous questions, and provide a solid basis to address them in ancillary studies of the cohort., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Malignant hypertension (MHT) crisis triggers widespread microvascular damage, particularly in the brain. Despite recent MRI evidence highlighting acute cerebral injuries during MHT crises, follow-up data remain scarce. This study seeks to fill this gap by exploring how brain MRI markers evolve following acute MHT crisis management. We conducted a retrospective analysis of brain MRI data from MHT patients admitted to Bordeaux University Hospital between 2008 and 2022. Eligible patients had at least one follow-up MRI. Analysis blinded to clinical data was performed to identify markers of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), acute stroke, cerebral hemorrhage, and microangiopathy. Out of 149 patients, 47 had follow-up MRIs. Most were male (72.3%) with a mean age of 48.2 ± 10.8 years. The median interval between initial and follow-up MRI was 228 days. Follow-up MRIs revealed new strokes in 10.6% of patients, cerebral hemorrhages in 4.3%, and no cases of PRES. Additionally, more patients exhibited chronic lacunar infarcts and/or microbleeds, with overall Fazekas scores remaining stable in 66.0%, improving in 31.9%, and worsening in 2.1%. Subgroup analyses based on blood pressure control or follow-up duration showed no significant differences in MRI markers. This study sheds light on the risk of new cerebrovascular events and the dynamic changes in brain MRI markers following acute MHT crisis management. Understanding these changes could lead to improved diagnosis, personalized treatment strategies, and proactive patient care for individuals with MHT., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: The prevalence of secondary causes of hypertension in young adults is unknown, and therefore, there is no consensus about the indication of screening of secondary hypertension (2HTN) in this population. The objective was to report the prevalence and the causes of 2HTN in young subjects., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 2090 patients with confirmed hypertension aged 18 to 40 years with full workup for 2HTN screening were included. We assessed the prevalence of 2HTN and analyzed the factors associated., Results: Among 2090 patients, 619 (29.6%) had a 2HTN. The most frequent diagnoses of 2HTN in descending order were primary aldosteronism (n=339; 54.8%), renovascular hypertension (n=114; 18.4%), primary kidney disease (n=80; 12.9%), pheochromocytoma/functional paraganglioma (n=37; 5.9%), hypertension caused by drugs or substances (n=32; 6.0%), and other diagnoses (n=17; 2.7%). Patients with blood pressure <160/100 mm Hg did not have a lower prevalence of 2HTN regardless of the number of treatments. The prevalence of 2HTN was higher in the decade between 30 and 40 years of age than between 18 and 30 years of age ( P =0.024). Female sex, hypokalemia, treatment with at least 2 medications, no familial history of hypertension, body mass index <25 kg/m², and diabetes were associated with a higher prevalence of 2HTN., Conclusions: The prevalence of 2HTN is high among young patients with hypertension (29.6% in our cohort), regardless of age and blood pressure level. All patients with hypertension under 40 years of age should be screened for secondary causes., Competing Interests: None.

Arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in different populations. Destiffening appears to be possible through the control of the main cardiovascular risk factors, with however important individual variations. There are so far too few data available on the prognostic importance of changes in arterial stiffness. We tested the consequences of changes in arterial stiffness assessed with the QKD method on the incidence of cardiovascular events in a cohort of hypertensive patients. The change of QKD 100-60 was calculated as the difference between baseline and last follow-up value. Patients were classified as group 0 with stable or increased QKD 100-60 and group 1 with decreased QKD 100-60 (increased arterial stiffness). The prognostic of these two groups was analysed with a Cox model including age, baseline QKD 100-60 , 24 h SBP (baseline and change), delay between first and last recording, sex, diabetes, smoking, and hypercholesterolemia. We included 555 essential hypertensive patients with 24 h ambulatory measurement of BP and QKD at baseline and follow-up. The follow-up period was 12.28 ± 7.38 years with an average time between baseline and last recording of 8.86 ± 6.48 years. 94 cardiovascular events occurred. The group with increased arterial stiffness shows the double risk of occurrence of cardiovascular event than the group with stable or reduced arterial stiffness independently of other factors including changes in 24 h SBP., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Society of Hypertension.)

Background: The randomized, sham-controlled RADIANCE-HTN (A Study of the Recor Medical Paradise System in Clinical Hypertension) SOLO, RADIANCE-HTN TRIO, and RADIANCE II (A Study of the Recor Medical Paradise System in Stage II Hypertension) trials independently met their primary end point of a greater reduction in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) 2 months after ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) in patients with hypertension. To characterize the longer-term effectiveness and safety of uRDN versus sham at 6 months, after the blinded addition of antihypertensive treatments (AHTs), we pooled individual patient data across these 3 similarly designed trials., Methods: Patients with mild to moderate hypertension who were not on AHT or with hypertension resistant to a standardized combination triple AHT were randomized to uRDN (n=293) versus sham (n=213); they were to remain off of added AHT throughout 2 months of follow-up unless specified blood pressure (BP) criteria were exceeded. In each trial, if monthly home BP was ≥135/85 mm Hg from 2 to 5 months, standardized AHT was sequentially added to target home BP <135/85 mm Hg under blinding to initial treatment assignment. Six-month outcomes included baseline- and AHT-adjusted change in daytime ambulatory, home, and office SBP; change in AHT; and safety. Linear mixed regression models using all BP measurements and change in AHT from baseline through 6 months were used., Results: Patients (70% men) were 54.1±9.3 years of age with a baseline daytime ambulatory/home/office SBP of 150.5±9.8/151.0±12.4/155.5±14.4 mm Hg, respectively. From 2 to 6 months, BP decreased in both groups with AHT titration, but fewer uRDN patients were prescribed AHT ( P =0.004), and fewer additional AHT were prescribed to uRDN patients versus sham patients ( P =0.001). Whereas the unadjusted between-group difference in daytime ambulatory SBP was similar at 6 months, the baseline and medication-adjusted between-group difference at 6 months was -3.0 mm Hg (95% CI, -5.7, -0.2; P =0.033), in favor of uRDN+AHT. For home and office SBP, the adjusted between-group differences in favor of uRDN+AHT over 6 months were -5.4 mm Hg (-6.8, -4.0; P <0.001) and -5.2 mm Hg (-7.1, -3.3; P <0.001), respectively. There was no heterogeneity between trials. Safety outcomes were few and did not differ between groups., Conclusions: This individual patient-data analysis of 506 patients included in the RADIANCE trials demonstrates the maintenance of BP-lowering efficacy of uRDN versus sham at 6 months, with fewer added AHTs., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT02649426 and NCT03614260., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Azizi reports receiving grants from the European Horizon 2020 program; grants and nonfinancial support from Recor Medical, Idorsia, and Novartis; and personal fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Cincor, Medtronic, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. Dr Sharp has received personal fees from Recor Medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Penumbra, and Philips. Dr Fisher has received grant support and personal fees from Recor Medical and personal fees from Medtronic. Dr Lobo has received personal fees from Recor Medical, Medtronic, Ablative Solutions, and Vascular Dynamics; and has received grants from Medtronic. Dr Daemen received institutional grant or research support from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, ACIST Medical, Medtronic, Microport, Pie Medical, and Recor Medical, and consultancy or speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, ACIST Medical, Boston Scientific, Cardialysis BV, CardiacBooster, Kaminari Medical, Recor Medical, PulseCath, Pie Medical, Sanofi, Siemens Health Care, and Medtronic. Dr Lurz has received institutional grant support from Recor Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abbott. Dr Mahfoud is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (DGK), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR219, project ID 322900939), and Deutsche Herzstiftung; and has received scientific support from Ablative Solutions, Medtronic, and Recor Medical, and speaker honoraria or consulting fees from Ablative Solutions, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Inari, Medtronic, Merck, Recor Medical, Servier, and Terumo. Dr Schmieder has received grant support and personal fees from Recor Medical, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions. Dr Basile has received grant support from Recor Medical and Ablative Solutions. Dr Bloch has received personal fees from Recor Medical and Medtronic. Dr Weber has received personal fees from Recor Medical, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions. Dr Saxena has received grant support from Recor Medical, Ablative Solutions, Applied Therapeutics, Vascular Dynamics, and MSD; and has received consulting fees from Recor Medical, Esperion Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Novartis, and Vifor Pharma. Dr Wang reports no relationships relevant to the contents of this article to disclose. Dr Sanghvi has received grant support and personal fees from Recor Medical and Medtronic and has received grant support from CSI. Dr Jenkins reports institutional funding to Ochsner Medical Center from Medtronic, Abbott, Abiomed, and Recor Medical; and in addition to research grants, he has received honoraria for speaking engagements or proctoring consulting from Abbott, Recor Medical, and Medtronic. Dr Devireddy has received personal fees from Recor Medical, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Rader has received personal fees from Recor Medical, Medtronic, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Gosse has received research grant support from Recor Medical. L. Claude and Dr Dimitri Augustin are employees of Recor Medical. Dr McClure is an employee of NAMSA, a contractor for Recor Medical. Dr Kirtane reports institutional funding to Columbia University or Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, and Recor Medical; in addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid to Columbia University or Cardiovascular Research Foundation for speaking engagements or consulting; personal fees for consulting from Neurotronic; and travel expenses or meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, Recor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron.

Arterial stiffness, most often assessed with carotido-femoral pulse wave velocity predicts cardiovascular events but its use in clinical practice remains limited. The 24 h ambulatory monitoring of Blood pressure and timing of Korotkoff sounds (QKD interval) allows an automatic assessment of arterial stiffness and is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients. The long term follow up of our cohort of hypertensive patients gave us the opportunity to test the consequences of increased arterial stiffness on the incidence of all causes deaths and to define the populations who could benefit of this measurement beyond risk scores. The sample includes 930 patients (502 males, age 53 ± 13 years, baseline risk SCORE2-OP = 6.70 ± 4.97%) with an average follow up of 12.11 ± 7.4 years (0.3-30). In this population 169 cardiovascular events and 155 deaths were recorded. SCORE2-OP, 24 h Systolic Blood Pressure and arterial stiffness (QKDh) as a continuous or discontinuous variable (normal or reduced) were significantly and independently linked to the occurrence of cardiovascular events or all cause deaths in multivariate Cox model. ROC curves analysis show that measuring arterial stiffness with QKD method offers the best predictive value in patients with low or very low risk scores., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Introduction: A major issue confronting clinicians treating hypertension in pregnancy is the limited number of pharmacological options. Endovascular catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a new method to lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension by reducing the activity of the renal sympathetic nervous system. Drugs that affect this system are safe in pregnant women. So there is reasonable evidence that RDN performed before pregnancy should not have deleterious effects for the fetus. Because the efficacy of RDN may be greater in younger patients and in women, we may expect a larger proportion of BP normalisation in young hypertensive women, but this remains to be proven. Our primary objective is to quantify the proportion of BP normalisation with RDN in this population., Methods and Analysis: WHY-RDN is a multicentre randomised sham-controlled trial conducted in six French hypertension centres that will include 80 women with essential hypertension treated or untreated, who are planning a pregnancy in the next 2 years and will be randomly assigned to RDN or classic renal arteriography and sham RDN in a ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome is the normalisation of 24-hour BP (<130/80 mm Hg) at 2-month post procedure off treatment. Sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected responder rates of 24% and 3% in the treatment and control group, respectively. Secondary outcomes include the absence of adverse outcomes for a future pregnancy, the variations of BP in ambulatory and home BP measurements and the evaluation of treatment prescribed., Ethics and Dissemination: WHY-RDN has been approved by the French Ethics Committee (Tours, Region Centre, Ouest 1- number 2021T1-28 HPS). This project is being carried out in accordance with national and international guidelines. The findings of this study will be disseminated by publication., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05563337., Competing Interests: Competing interests: LS has been a consultant for Dilafor and Ferring Pharmaceuticals and has received in the past payment for presentations and educational events from Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Sigvaris. All other authors declare no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Arterial stiffness, an important predictor of cardiovascular event, has two components: one linked to the nonlinear elastic behaviour of the arterial wall and dependent of the blood pressure (BP) at the time of measurement, and the other linked to the structural modifications of the arterial wall as the consequences of the long-term effects of all cardiovascular risk factors, including BP. This second component is certainly the most important one and can be assessed with 24-h ambulatory monitoring of cardio-arm pulse transmission time (QKD method)., Methods: The working hypothesis of this study is that QKD100-60, the value of the QKD for a 100 mmHg SBP and 60 bpm heart rate is independent of 24-h SBP in both normotensive volunteers and treated hypertensive patients, in whom the long-term influence of BP is limited, whereas QKD100-60 is not independent of 24-h SBP in untreated hypertensive patients in whom high BP was able to damage the arterial wall on the long term. So we studied the relationships of QKD100-60 with 24-h BP and heart rate together with age, sex, height in multivariate regression analysis in three groups of patients; normal, untreated and treated hypertensive patients. QKD was measured with Novacor devices., Results: In the normal population (n = 323, aged 29 ± 10 years) and in the treated hypertensive population (n = 425, aged 58 ± 13 years) the QKD100-60 was indeed not significantly related to 24-h SBP. In the untreated hypertensive population (n = 614, aged 51 ± 13 years) the QKD100-60 was weakly but significantly related to 24-h SBP (r = 0.249, P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Ambulatory monitoring of QKD provides indices of arterial stiffness independent of BP level at the time of measurement and most interestingly of 24-h BP with the potential to refine risk in patients with low traditional risk scores., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Ultrasound renal denervation (uRDN) was shown to lower blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (HTN). Establishing the magnitude and consistency of the uRDN effect across the HTN spectrum is clinically important., Objective: To characterize the effectiveness and safety of uRDN vs a sham procedure from individual patient-level pooled data across uRDN trials including either patients with mild to moderate HTN on a background of no medications or with HTN resistant to standardized triple-combination therapy., Data Sources: A Study of the ReCor Medical Paradise System in Clinical Hypertension (RADIANCE-HTN SOLO and TRIO) and A Study of the ReCor Medical Paradise System in Stage II Hypertension (RADIANCE II) trials., Study Selection: Trials with similar designs, standardized operational implementation (medication standardization and blinding of both patients and physicians to treatment assignment), and follow-up., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Pooled analysis using individual patient-level data using linear regression models to compare uRDN with sham across the trials., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was baseline-adjusted change in 2-month daytime ambulatory systolic BP (dASBP) between groups., Results: A total of 506 patients were randomized in the 3 studies (uRDN, 293; sham, 213; mean [SD] age, 54.1 [9.3]; 354 male [70.0%]). After a 1-month medication stabilization period, dASBP was similar between the groups (mean [SD], uRDN, 150.3 [9.2] mm Hg; sham, 150.8 [10.5] mm Hg). At 2 months, dASBP decreased by 8.5 mm Hg to mean (SD) 141.8 (13.8) mm Hg among patients treated with uRDN and by 2.9 mm Hg to 147.9 (14.6) mm Hg among patients treated with a sham procedure (mean difference, -5.9; 95% CI, -8.1 to -3.8 mm Hg; P < .001 in favor of uRDN). BP decreases from baseline with uRDN vs sham were consistent across trials and across BP parameters (office SBP: -10.4 mm Hg vs -3.4 mm Hg; mean difference, -6.4 mm Hg; 95% CI, -9.1 to -3.6 mm Hg; home SBP: -8.4 mm Hg vs -1.4 mm Hg; mean difference, -6.8 mm Hg; 95% CI, -8.7 to -4.9 mm Hg, respectively). The BP reductions with uRDN vs sham were consistent across prespecified subgroups. Independent predictors of a larger BP response to uRDN were higher baseline BP and heart rate and the presence of orthostatic hypertension. No differences in early safety end points were observed between groups., Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this patient-level pooled analysis suggest that BP reductions with uRDN were consistent across HTN severity in sham-controlled trials designed with a 2-month primary end point to standardize medications across randomized groups., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02649426 and NCT03614260.

Background: Malignant hypertension has not disappeared and is associated with a poor prognosis. Yet, so far, it has received limited attention from the medical community. Guidelines are mainly based on expert consensus and low quality evidences., Method: We set up a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort of patients with malignant hypertension. We collect at admission medical history, demographic data, ongoing treatment, clinical parameters, symptoms, care pathways, target organ status and at discharge and during follow up treatment administrated, adverse events, blood pressure level, target organ status. We aim to recruit 500 patients with malignant hypertension in 5 years, with a 5-year follow-up. Our primary objective is to assess the 5 years prognosis of these patients., Discussion: The HAMA (Hypertension Arterielle MAligne, meaning malignant hypertension) registry aims to describe the epidemiology and to assess the prognosis of malignant hypertension in a contemporary multidisciplinary cohort, with emphasis on the diversity of current management and care pathway among the different medical specialties. It may help improving our pathophysiological knowledge, and pave the way to update the definition of this particular form of hypertension. The multidisciplinary network developed in the wake of this project is expected to facilitate the set up therapeutic trials, laying the ground for evidence-based recommendations., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Primary Aldosteronism (PA) is increasingly considered as a common disease affecting up to 10% of the hypertensive population. Standard of care comprises laparoscopic total adrenalectomy but innovative treatment such as RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA) constitutes an emerging promising alternative to surgery. The main aim of this study is to analyse the cost of RFA versus surgery on aldosterone-producing adenoma patient from the French National Health Insurance (FNHI) perspective., Methods: The ADERADHTA study was a prospective pilot study aiming to evaluate both safety and efficacy of the novel use of adrenal RFA on the patients with PA. This study conducted on two French sites and enrolled adult patients, between 2016 and 2018, presenting hypertension and underwent the RFA procedure. Direct medical (inpatient and outpatient) and non-medical (transportation, daily allowance) costs were calculated over a 6-month follow-up period. Moreover, the procedure costs for the RFA were calculated from the hospital perspective. Descriptive statistics were implemented., Results: Analysis was done on 21 patients in RFA groups and 27 patients in the surgery group. The difference in hospital costs between the RFA and surgery groups was €3774 (RFA: €1923; Surgery: €5697 p < 0.001) in favour of RFA. Inpatient and outpatient costs over the 6-month follow-up period were estimated at €3,48 for patients who underwent RFA. The production cost of implementing the RFA procedure was estimated at €1539 from the hospital perspective., Conclusion: Our study was the first to show that RFA is 2 to 3 times less costly than surgery. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT02756754., (© 2022. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).)

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a decrease in non-Covid-19 related diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in many countries. We explored the impact on tertiary hypertension care., Methods: We conducted an electronic survey regarding 6 key procedures in hypertension care within the Excellence Center network of the European Society of Hypertension., Results: Overall, 54 Excellence Centers from 18 European and 3 non-European countries participated. From 2019 to 2020, there were significant decreases in the median number per centre of ambulatory blood pressure monitorings (ABPM: 544/289 for 2019/2020), duplex ultrasound of renal arteries (Duplex RA: 88.5/55), computed tomographic/magnetic resonance imaging angiography of renal arteries (CT/MRI RA: 66/19.5), percutaneous angioplasties of renal arteries (PTA RA: 5/1), laboratory tests for catecholamines (116/67.5) and for renin/aldosterone (146/83.5) ( p  < 0.001 for all comparisons, respectively). While reductions in all assessed diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were observed in all annual 3-months periods in the comparisons between 2019 and 2020, the most pronounced reduction occurred between April and June 2020, which was the period of the first wave and the first lockdown in most affected countries. In this period, the median reductions in 2020, as compared to 2019, were 50.7% (ABPM), 47.1% (Duplex RA), 50% (CT/MRI RA), 57.1% (PTA RA), 46.9% (catecholamines) and 41.0% (renin/aldosterone), respectively. Overall differences in reduction between 3-month time intervals were statistically highly significant., Conclusion: Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures related to hypertension were dramatically reduced during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic, with the largest reduction during the first lockdown. The long-term consequences regarding blood pressure control and, ultimately, cardiovascular events remain to be investigated.

Importance: Although early trials of endovascular renal denervation (RDN) for patients with resistant hypertension (RHTN) reported inconsistent results, ultrasound RDN (uRDN) was found to decrease blood pressure (BP) vs sham at 2 months in patients with RHTN taking stable background medications in the Study of the ReCor Medical Paradise System in Clinical Hypertension (RADIANCE-HTN TRIO) trial., Objectives: To report the prespecified analysis of the persistence of the BP effects and safety of uRDN vs sham at 6 months in conjunction with escalating antihypertensive medications., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, sham-controlled, clinical trial with outcome assessors and patients blinded to treatment assignment, enrolled patients from March 11, 2016, to March 13, 2020. This was an international, multicenter study conducted in the US and Europe. Participants with daytime ambulatory BP of 135/85 mm Hg or higher after 4 weeks of single-pill triple-combination treatment (angiotensin-receptor blocker, calcium channel blocker, and thiazide diuretic) with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 40 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater were randomly assigned to uRDN or sham with medications unchanged through 2 months. From 2 to 5 months, if monthly home BP was 135/85 mm Hg or higher, standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment starting with aldosterone antagonists was initiated under blinding to treatment assignment., Interventions: uRDN vs sham procedure in conjunction with added medications to target BP control., Main Outcomes and Measures: Six-month change in medications, change in daytime ambulatory systolic BP, change in home systolic BP adjusted for baseline BP and medications, and safety., Results: A total of 65 of 69 participants in the uRDN group and 64 of 67 participants in the sham group (mean [SD] age, 52.4 [8.3] years; 104 male [80.6%]) with a mean (SD) eGFR of 81.5 (22.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 had 6-month daytime ambulatory BP measurements. Fewer medications were added in the uRDN group (mean [SD], 0.7 [1.0] medications) vs sham (mean [SD], 1.1 [1.1] medications; P = .045) and fewer patients in the uRDN group received aldosterone antagonists at 6 months (26 of 65 [40.0%] vs 39 of 64 [60.9%]; P = .02). Despite less intensive standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment, mean (SD) daytime ambulatory BP at 6 months was 138.3 (15.1) mm Hg with uRDN vs 139.0 (14.3) mm Hg with sham (additional decreases of -2.4 [16.6] vs -7.0 [16.7] mm Hg from month 2, respectively), whereas home SBP was lowered to a greater extent with uRDN by 4.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.5-8.1 mm Hg; P = .03) in a mixed model adjusting for baseline and number of medications. Adverse events were infrequent and similar between groups., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, in patients with RHTN initially randomly assigned to uRDN or a sham procedure and who had persistent elevation of BP at 2 months after the procedure, standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment escalation resulted in similar BP reduction in both groups at 6 months, with fewer additional medications required in the uRDN group., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02649426.

The blood pressure (BP) lowering response to renal denervation (RDN) remains variable with about one-third of patients not responding to ultrasound or radiofrequency RDN. Identification of predictors of the BP response to RDN is needed to optimize patient selection for this therapy. This is a post-hoc analysis of the RADIANCE-HTN SOLO study. BP response to RDN was measured by the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure (dASBP) at 2 months post procedure. Univariate regression was used initially to assess potential predictors of outcome followed by multivariate regression analysis. In the univariate analysis, predictors of response to RDN were higher baseline daytime ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (dADBP), the use of antihypertensive medications at screening, and presence of orthostatic hypertension (OHTN) whilst the presence of untreated accessory arteries was a negative predictor of response. Multivariate analysis determined that dADBP and use of antihypertensive medications were predictors of response to RDN with a trend for OHTN to predict response. Obese females also appeared to be better responders to RDN in an interaction model. RDN is more effective in patients with elevated baseline dADBP and those with OHTN, suggesting increased peripheral vascular resistance secondary to heightened sympathetic tone. These assessments are easy to perform in clinical setting and may help in phenotyping patients who will respond better to RDN., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is now considered the gold standard to evaluate BP, and predicts related cardiovascular risk. However, no study has reported the association of long-term changes in ABPM with the incidence of cardiovascular events, therefore the objective of this work. We included patients from the Bordeaux cohort of hypertensive patients, who had undergone at least two ABPM; the first was performed before or after antihypertensive treatment was started, and the second was the last recording available before any cardiovascular event. We included 591 patients (mean age, 54 years) with a 7-year average interval between the first and last ABPM, a 10-year average follow-up, and a total of 111 cardiovascular events. The patients were divided into four groups: G0, first and last 24 h systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 130; G1, first 24 h SBP ≥ 130, last 24 h SBP < 130; G2, first 24 h SBP < 130, last 24 h SBP ≥ 130; and G3, first 24 h SBP ≥ 130, last 24 h SBP ≥ 130 mmHg. Baseline ABPM better predicted future events than the last ABPM. G0 and G2 had similar survival. G1 and G3 had a worse prognosis than G0 and G2, while G1 had an intermediate risk between G0 and G3, indicating some benefit of treatment. In conclusion, our study showed the prognostic value of the first ABPM recorded in hypertensive patients and the persistence of risk when 24 h BP is controlled by antihypertensive treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Primary aldosteronism is responsible for a major cardiovascular risk that can be avoided by specific treatment. A better characterization of the hypertensive population with primary aldosteronism would not only improve the overall diagnosis but also allows a better selection of patients requiring adrenal vein sampling (AVS)., Methods: Creation of a prospective single-center Bordeaux ABORDAGE study of hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent AVS. Primary aldosteronism was diagnosed according to the recommendations of the SFE/SFHTA. Peripheral and central blood pressure measurements were performed with mercury sphygmomanometer, SphygmoCor applanation tonometer and ambulatory blood pressure measurement. An adrenal computed tomography and an unstimulated AVS were performed in each patient., Results: One hundred and eighty-eight patients were included in our study. They were mostly men (61.7%), with a mean age of 48.7 ± 10.5 years, BMI of 29.7 ± 5 kg/ m2 and duration of hypertension of 101.5 ± 84 months. AVS was selective in 82.3% of patients and lateralization was concordant with CT in only 35.4% of patients. Lateralized secretion was significantly associated with a marked biological primary aldosteronism and hypertension. In multivariate analysis, no variable specifically differentiated patients with aldosterone lateralization., Conclusion: The ABORDAGE population description is consistent with the data found in the literature. These characteristics are ultimately those expected in essential hypertension population, which therefore, could explain part of the underdiagnosis of primary aldosteronism. Only AVS is able to predict the lateralization of secretion with a post adrenalectomy recovery of about 90% in case of lateralization. The generalization of AVS would, therefore, increase the proportion of patients with primary aldosteronism cured., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The RADIANCE-HTN SOLO trial demonstrated a greater reduction in daytime ambulatory SBP at 2 months by endovascular ultrasound renal denervation than sham procedure. We hypothesized that plasma renin and aldosterone concentrations would be associated with the SBP response to renal denervation., Methods: Hypertensive patients were randomized to renal denervation (n = 74) or sham (n = 72) after a 4-week washout of antihypertensive medications. In a 53-patient subset, 2-month and 6-month plasma renin and aldosterone concentration were measured. Dietary sodium was not controlled., Results: Mean age of the 29 treatment and 24 sham patients was 54 years; 62% were men; 17% black. Daytime ambulatory SBP fell in the denervation but not the sham group at 2 months (-7.8 ± 10.7 vs. -0.1 ± 10.1 mmHg; P = 0.048). Baseline plasma renin and aldosterone concentrations were in the low-normal range, did not change significantly at 2 months in either group and did not predict response to renal denervation. At 6 months, after the addition of antihypertensive medications, there was a significant rise in renin in the sham but not the denervation group., Conclusion: Although renal denervation but not sham resulted in a decrease in daytime ambulatory SBP at 2 months, renin and aldosterone concentrations did neither predict the BP response to renal denervation; nor did they fall after denervation. A rise in renin at 6 months in the sham group likely represents confounding from antihypertensive medications. Whether the BP-lowering effect of renal denervation depends on reducing local intrarenal renin release requires further study., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute and diffuse microvascular damage characterizes malignant hypertension (MHT), the deadliest form of hypertension (HTN). Although its ophthalmological, renal and cardiological repercussions are well known, brain involvement is considered rare with few descriptions, although it is one of the main causes of death. We hypothesized that brain MRI abnormalities are common in MHT, even in patients without objective neurological signs., Method: We analyzed retrospectively the brain MRI of patients admitted for acute MHT between 2008 and 2018 in Bordeaux University Hospital, regardless of their neurological status. A trained operator analyzed every brain MRI, looking for posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), ischemic stroke, intracerebral hematoma (ICH) and microangiopathy markers. We included 58 patients without neurological signs, 66% were men, and mean age was 45.6 ± 11.3 years., Results: Brain MRI were normal in 26% of patients but we found at least one acute abnormality on brain MRI in 29% and an Small Vessel Disease score (SVD score) of two or higher in 52%. In patients with neurological signs, these findings were 9, 53 and 70%, respectively. A PRES was found in 16% of asymptomatic patients and 31% had an ischemic stroke and/or a cerebral hematoma., Conclusion: PRES, recent hematoma, ischemic stroke and severe cerebral microangiopathy are common findings in MHT patients without neurological signs on admission. The impact of these findings on patient management, and their cerebrovascular and cognitive prognostic value, should be established. Brain MRI might need to become systematic in patients suffering from MHT episodes., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: High-resolution free-breathing late gadolinium enhancement (HR-LGE) was shown valuable for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes with non-obstructed coronary arteries. The method may be useful to detect COVID-related myocardial injuries but is hampered by prolonged acquisition times. We aimed to introduce an accelerated HR-LGE technique for the diagnosis of COVID-related myocardial injuries., Method: An undersampled navigator-gated HR-LGE (acquired resolution of 1.25 mm 3 ) sequence combined with advanced patch-based low-rank reconstruction was developed and validated in a phantom and in 23 patients with structural heart disease (test cohort; 15 men; 55 ± 16 years). Twenty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection associated with troponin rise (COVID cohort; 15 men; 46 ± 24 years) prospectively underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with the proposed sequence in our center. Image sharpness, quality, signal intensity differences and diagnostic value of free-breathing HR-LGE were compared against conventional breath-held low-resolution LGE (LR-LGE, voxel size 1.8x1.4x6mm)., Results: Structures sharpness in the phantom showed no differences with the fully sampled image up to an undersampling factor of x3.8 (P > 0.5). In patients (N = 43), this acceleration allowed for acquisition times of 7min21s ± 1min12s at 1.25 mm 3 resolution. Compared with LR-LGE, HR-LGE showed higher image quality (P = 0.03) and comparable signal intensity differences (P > 0.5). In patients with structural heart disease, all LGE-positive segments on LR-LGE were also detected on HR-LGE (80/391) with 21 additional enhanced segments visible only on HR-LGE (101/391, P < 0.001). In 4 patients with COVID-19 history, HR-LGE was definitely positive while LR-LGE was either definitely negative (1 microinfarction and 1 myocarditis) or inconclusive (2 myocarditis)., Conclusions: Undersampled free-breathing isotropic HR-LGE can detect additional areas of late enhancement as compared to conventional breath-held LR-LGE. In patients with history of COVID-19 infection associated with troponin rise, the method allows for detailed characterization of myocardial injuries in acceptable scan times and without the need for repeated breath holds., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

[Figure: see text].

The present paper provides an update of previous recommendations on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring from the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Variability sequentially published in years 2000, 2008 and 2010. This update has taken into account new evidence in this field, including a recent statement by the American Heart association, as well as technological developments, which have occurred over the past 20 years. The present document has been developed by the same ESH Working Group with inputs from an international team of experts, and has been endorsed by the ESH., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Endovascular renal denervation reduces blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, but its efficacy in patients with true resistant hypertension has not been shown. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation in patients with hypertension resistant to three or more antihypertensive medications., Methods: In a randomised, international, multicentre, single-blind, sham-controlled trial done at 28 tertiary centres in the USA and 25 in Europe, we included patients aged 18-75 years with office blood pressure of at least 140/90 mm Hg despite three or more antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. Eligible patients were switched to a once daily, fixed-dose, single-pill combination of a calcium channel blocker, an angiotensin receptor blocker, and a thiazide diuretic. After 4 weeks of standardised therapy, patients with daytime ambulatory blood pressure of at least 135/85 mm Hg were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer (stratified by centres) to ultrasound renal denervation or a sham procedure. Patients and outcome assessors were masked to randomisation. Addition of antihypertensive medications was allowed if specified blood pressure thresholds were exceeded. The primary endpoint was the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure at 2 months in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02649426., Findings: Between March 11, 2016, and March 13, 2020, 989 participants were enrolled and 136 were randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=69) or a sham procedure (n=67). Full adherence to the combination medications at 2 months among patients with urine samples was similar in both groups (42 [82%] of 51 in the renal denervation group vs 47 [82%] of 57 in the sham procedure group; p=0·99). Renal denervation reduced daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure more than the sham procedure (-8·0 mm Hg [IQR -16·4 to 0·0] vs -3·0 mm Hg [-10·3 to 1·8]; median between-group difference -4·5 mm Hg [95% CI -8·5 to -0·3]; adjusted p=0·022); the median between-group difference was -5·8 mm Hg (95% CI -9·7 to -1·6; adjusted p=0·0051) among patients with complete ambulatory blood pressure data. There were no differences in safety outcomes between the two groups., Interpretation: Compared with a sham procedure, ultrasound renal denervation reduced blood pressure at 2 months in patients with hypertension resistant to a standardised triple combination pill. If the blood pressure lowering effect and safety of renal denervation are maintained in the long term, renal denervation might be an alternative to the addition of further antihypertensive medications in patients with resistant hypertension., Funding: ReCor Medical., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MA has received research grants from the French Ministry of Health, Quantum Genomics, and the European Horizon 2020 programme; has received grant support and non-financial support from ReCor Medical and Idorsia; and has received personal fees from CVRx, AstraZeneca, Alnylam Pharmaceutical, and Poxel Pharma. KS has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical and Medtronic, and has received grant support from Cardiovascular Systems. MSax has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical. PG has received grant support from the University Hospital of Bordeaux. LCR has received personal fees from ReCor Medical. APe has received personal fees from Quantum Genomics and grant support from Ablative Solutions, Quantum Genomics, and ReCor Medical. JB has received grant support from ReCor Medical and Ablative Solutions. MJB has received personal fees from ReCor Medical and Medtronic. JD has received grant support from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Acist Medical, AstraZeneca, Pie Medical, and Pulse Cath, and personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Acist Medical, Boston Scientific, Pie Medical, and Pulse Cath. MDL has received personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, CVRx, Ablative Solutions, Vascular Dynamics, ROX Medical, and Tarilan Laser Technologies, and grants from Medtronic. FM is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR 219); and has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Berlin Chemie, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. RES has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions. ASPS has received personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Philips. MAW has received personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Ablative Solutions. APa has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions. DH reports institutional funding to Stamford Hospital from ReCor Medical. SB has received grant support from Abbott Vascular, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and REATA; and personal fees from Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, REATA, Amgen, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Meril. JW has received personal fees from ReCor Medical and Medtronic. NCB is an employee of ReCor Medical and is the author on multiple patents in the field of renal denervation. HR-S is an employee of ReCor Medical. LC is an employee of ReCor Medical. CKM is an employee of North American Science Associates and a contractor for ReCor Medical. AJK reports institutional funding (in addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid for speaking engagements or consulting) to Columbia University or the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (New York, NY, USA) from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Cardiovascular Systems, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, and ReCor Medical. AJK also reports travel expenses or meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Cardiovascular Systems, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, Regeneron, and ReCor Medical. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Short-term blood pressure variability derived from 24-h ambulatory monitoring is associated with poor cardiovascular prognosis. However, previous analyses of this have clearly been influenced by clinical cofounders, particularly blood pressure (BP) level. Arterial stiffness is a powerful marker of cardiovascular risk, which may influence BP variability. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of BP variability based on 24-h ambulatory measurements and adjusted for arterial stiffness., Methods: Population: Bordeaux cohort of hypertensive patients. Inclusion criteria were 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline with measurements every 15' day and night, determination of wake-up time and bedtime, and assessment of arterial stiffness with monitoring of Korotkoff sound arrival time. A total of 969 patients (age 54 ± 14 years) with an average follow up of 120 ± 78 months and 178 cardiovascular recorded events were included., Results: In univariate survival analyses, the standard deviations of day, night, and 24-h SBP were associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular events. The standard deviation of night-time SBP showed the strongest association with the outcome variable and was entered into multivariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, night-time SBP variability remained significantly associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular events after adjusting for major cardiovascular risk factors, 24-h SBP, and arterial stiffness. BP variability and arterial stiffness showed no significant association., Conclusion: Our results suggest that variability of night-time SBP is an important marker of the risk of cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients, independently of average 24-h BP and arterial stiffness., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation to treat aldosterone-producing adenomas., Methods: In an open prospective bicentric pilot study, patients with hypertension on ambulatory blood pressure measurement, a primary aldosteronism, an adenoma measuring less than 4 cm, and confirmation of lateralization by adrenal venous sampling were recruited. The primary endpoint, based on ABPM performed at 6 months after the radiofrequency ablation, was a daytime SBP/DBP less than 135/85 mmHg without any antihypertensive drugs or a reduction of at least 20 mmHg for SBP or 10 mmHg for DBP., Results: Thirty patients have been included (mean age = 51 ± 11 years; 50% women). Mean baseline daytime SBP and DBP were 144 ± 19 / 95 ± 15 mmHg and 80% received at least two antihypertensive drugs. At 6 months: 47% (95% CI 28-66) of patients reached the primary endpoint, mean daytime SBP and DBP were 131 ± 14 (101-154)/87 ± 10 (71-107) mmHg; 43% of them did not take any antihypertensive drug and 70% of them did not take potassium supplements. Few complications were recorded: four cases of back pain at day 1 postablation; three limited pneumothoraxes, which resolved spontaneously; one lesion of a polar renal artery., Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation for hypertensive patients with aldosterone-producing adenomas seems to be an emerging promising alternative to surgery. Its efficacy and its feasibility have to be confirmed in a larger sample of patients., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background COVID-19 causes significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the high prevalence of delirium and delirium-related symptoms in COVID-19 patients, data and evidence-based recommendations on the pathophysiology and management of delirium are limited. Objective We conducted a rapid review of COVID-19-related delirium literature to provide a synthesis of literature on the prevalence, pathoetiology, and management of delirium in these patients. Methods Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, LitCovid, WHO-COVID-19, and Web of Science electronic databases were conducted. Grey literature was also reviewed, including preprint servers, archives, and websites of relevant organizations. Search results were limited to the English language. We included literature focused on adults with COVID-19 and delirium. Papers were excluded if they did not mention signs or symptoms of delirium. Results 229 studies described prevalence, pathoetiology, and/or management of delirium in adults with COVID-19. Delirium was rarely assessed with validated tools. Delirium affected >50% of all patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU. The etiology of COVID-19 delirium is likely multifactorial, with some evidence of direct brain effect. Prevention remains the cornerstone of management in these patients. To date, there is no evidence to suggest specific pharmacological strategies. Discussion Delirium is common in COVID-19 and may manifest from both indirect and direct effects on the central nervous system. Further research is required to investigate contributing mechanisms. As there is limited empirical literature on delirium management in COVID-19, management with non-pharmacological measures and judicious use of pharmacotherapy is suggested., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Renal denervation (RDN) is effective in lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension. The issue remains how to best identify potential responders. Ambulatory BP monitoring may be useful. Baseline nighttime systolic BP (SBP) ≥136 mm Hg and its variability (SD) ≥12 mm Hg in DENER-HTN trial or 24-hour heart rate ≥73.5 bpm in SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Trial were shown to predict the BP response to RDN. We applied these criteria to the patients with hypertension in the sham-controlled RADIANCE-HTN SOLO trial to predict the BP response to ultrasound RDN at 2 months while patients were maintained off medications. BP responders were defined as: clinical with 24-hour SBP <130 mm Hg (RDN: 22/64 versus sham: 7/58); meaningful with 24-hour SBP reduction ≥10 mm Hg (RDN: 24/64, sham: 7/58); and extreme with 24-hour SBP reduction above mean+2 SD of the SBP decrease in the sham group, that is, ≥16.5 mm Hg (RDN: 10/64 versus sham: 2/58). The predictive criteria reported above were tested for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The predictive value varied according to the definition of response, with the clinical definition being strongly influenced by regression to the mean. Baseline nighttime SBP and its variability, especially when combined, offered good specificity (>90% irrespective of definition) but low sensitivity (from 9.1% to 30% depending on the definition) to predict responders; the heart rate criterion had insufficient predictive value. This analysis suggests the potential role of nighttime SBP and its variability to predict BP response to RDN in patients with hypertension. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02649426.

Objectives: This study reports the 12-month results of the RADIANCE-HTN (A Study of the ReCor Medical Paradise System in Clinical Hypertension) SOLO trial following unblinding of patients at 6 months., Background: The blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy and safety of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (RDN) in the absence (2 months) and presence (6 months) of antihypertensive medications were previously reported., Methods: Patients with daytime ambulatory BP ≥135/85 mm Hg after 4 weeks off medication were randomized to RDN (n = 74) or sham (n = 72) and maintained off medication for 2 months. A standardized medication escalation protocol was instituted between 2 and 5 months (blinded phase). Between 6 and 12 months (unblinded phase), patients received antihypertensive medications at physicians' discretion. Outcomes at 12 months included medication burden, change in daytime ambulatory systolic BP (dASBP) and office or home systolic BP (SBP), visit-to-visit variability in SBP, and safety., Results: Sixty-five of 74 RDN patients and 67 of 72 sham patients had 12-month dASBP measurements. The proportion of patients on ≥2 medications (27.7% vs. 44.8%; p = 0.041), the number of medications (0 vs. 1.4; p = 0.015), and defined daily dose (1.4 vs. 2.2; p = 0.007) were less with RDN versus sham. The decrease in dASBP from baseline in the RDN group (-16.5 ± 12.9 mm Hg) remained stable at 12 months. The RDN versus sham adjusted difference at 12 months was -2.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.9 to 1.3 mm Hg; p = 0.201) for dASBP, -6.3 mm Hg (95% CI: -11.1 to -1.5 mm Hg; p = 0.010) for office SBP, and -3.4 mm Hg (95% CI: -6.9 to 0.1 mm Hg; p = 0.062) for home SBP. Visit-to-visit variability in SBP was smaller in the RDN group. No renal artery injury was detected on computed tomographic or magnetic resonance angiography., Conclusions: Despite unblinding, the BP-lowering effect of RDN was maintained at 12 months with fewer prescribed medications compared with sham., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures This work was supported by ReCor Medical. Dr. Azizi has received research grants from the French Ministry of Health, Quantum Genomics, and the European Horizon 2020 program; has received grant support and nonfinancial support from ReCor Medical and Idorsia; and has received personal fees from CVRx. Dr. Daemen has received grant support from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Acist Medical, AstraZeneca, Pie Medical, and Pulse Cath; and has received personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Acist Medical, Boston Scientific, Pie Medical, and Pulse Cath. Dr. Lobo has received personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, CVRx, Ablative Solutions, Vascular Dynamics, ROX Medical, and Tarilan Laser Technologies; and has received grants from Medtronic. Dr. Mahfoud is supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, Deutsche Hochdruckliga, and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB TRR 219); and has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Berlin Chemie, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Sharp has received personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, and Philips. Dr. Schmieder has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, and Ablative Solutions. Dr. Saxena has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical. Dr. Lurz has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abbott; and has received personal fees from Medtronic and Occlutech. Dr. Bloch has received personal fees from ReCor Medical and Medtronic. Dr. Basile has received grant support from ReCor Medical and Ablative Solutions. Dr. Weber has received personal fees from ReCor Medical, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Ablative Solutions. Dr. Rump has received personal fees and other support from ReCor Medical. Dr. Sanghvi has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical and Medtronic; and has received grant support from CSI. Dr. Rader has received other support from ReCor Medical. Dr. Fisher has received grant support and personal fees from ReCor Medical. Dr. Gosse has received grant support from the University Hospital of Bordeaux. Ms. Claude is an employee of ReCor Medical. Dr. Barman is an employee of ReCor Medical; and holds multiple patents in renal denervation. Dr. McClure is an employee of NAMSA, a contractor for ReCor Medical. Dr. Kirtane has received institutional funding to Columbia University and/or the Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, Philips, and ReCor Medical; and has received personal fees for continuing medical education, conference honoraria, and travel and meals only. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

: Malignant hypertension (MHT) still remains a severe condition that requires early recognition and treatment. Over the years, the prevention and treatment of MHT have significantly advanced through the introduction of modern antihypertensive agents. However, in the absence of robust clinical trials, there remain no formal guidelines on the treatment of MHT. This review summarizes the historical background and pathophysiological evidence of MHT, which has led to common practices in its pharmacological management but can also introduce challenges. The current consensus for treatment involves early intravenous infusion of antihypertensive agents, but oral blockers of the renin-angiotensin system may improve the management of MHT, and it offers a suitable treatment option in low-income countries where the condition remains relatively prevalent.

Introduction: Pheochromocytoma is a rare disease, which may manifest as severe cardiac complications. Apart from these situations, the "chronic" cardiac impact is not clearly defined. A cardiac MRI study suggests that these patients are carrying areas of fibrosis and foci of left ventricular myocarditis. Since these abnormalities are usually associated with altered left ventricular longitudinal systolic strain, we hypothesize that this strain is altered in patients with a "chronic" pheochromocytoma., Method: This retrospective case-control study was performed using patients from the Bordeaux University Hospital database, included between 2008 and 2016. We compared the left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), radial and circumferential systolic strain and classic echocardiographic parameters between patients with pheochromocytoma and controls matched for age, sex, body mass index and systolic blood pressure., Results: The analysis included 47 patients and 47 correctly matched controls. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of GLS (-20.7±2.4% vs. -20.2±2.7%, P=0.40), radial strain, left ventricular mass or diastolic function. Left ventricular ejection fraction and circumferential strain were significantly higher in patients than in controls, with a significantly lower telediastolic diameter., Conclusion: No significant changes in GLS were observed in our pheochromocytoma patients, compared with controls. Several hypotheses may explain these results. The presence of fibrosis foci and areas of left ventricular myocarditis being associated with a poor cardiological prognosis, a systematic cardiac MRI could be discussed in these patients, until further studies are performed., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Recurrent vasovagal syncope (VVS) is associated with decreased quality-of-life and frequent use of emergency services. The evidence base for causality, diagnostic procedures and potential VVS treatments is poor. Scattered observations in the literature suggest a link between respiratory disturbances during sleep and VVS. Empirical observations lead us to further hypothesise that the appropriate management of sleep apnoea syndrome (SAS) may help resolve comorbid recurrent VVS in certain patients. We therefore designed this pilot study to provide a framework for the observation of changes in outcomes accompanying the deployment of SAS treatments in patients with VVS., Methods and Analysis: This is a multicentre, registry-based study whose primary objective is to evaluate the effect of SAS management on the number of syncope/presyncope episodes in a population suffering from both VVS and SAS. To this effect, syncope rates prior to the treatment of SAS will be compared with those occurring after the initiation of the latter. In addition, yearly assessments will collect data for echocardiography, polysomnography, Holter monitoring, table tilt tests, multiple sleep latency tests, SAS management parameters and questionnaires describing fatigue, depression and quality-of-life. Sixty patients will be included with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. The primary analysis will use comparisons of centrality for paired data to describe the changes in syncope rates before versus after the initiation of SAS management. Longitudinal data will be analysed using mixed models with patients set as a random effect. Subgroup analyses will be performed for SAS-treatment adherence and efficacy., Ethics and Dissemination: The VVS-SAS registry was approved by an ethics committee (Comité pour la Protection des Personnes Ile-de-France VI, Reference number CPP/2-18) in accordance with French law. The princeps publication will present before-after SAS management results and longitudinal analyses., Trial Registration Number: NCT04294524. Pre-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VP declares personal fees (outside the submitted work) from Resmed, Lowenstein, Phillips and non-financial support (outside the submitted work) from SOS Oxygène and ISIS. FG reports personal fees (outside the submitted work) from Air Liquide Santé, Cidelec, Resmed, Sefam, and non-financial support (outside the submitted work) from Air Liquide Santé, Asten Santé, Sefam., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Data on the long term evolution of renal function in essential hypertensive patients are scarce, showing a low incidence of end stage renal diseases but without information on how the renal function evolves. Our aim is to describe the long term evolution of renal function and possible trajectories in hypertensive patients. We included patients from an ongoing cohort with essential hypertension, no proteinuria at baseline and no diabetes during follow-up and with at least two creatinine dosages 4 years apart. A long term (average 16 years) follow-up was available in 609 patients (baseline age 51.8 ± 11.1 years, 52 % male, mean office BP 156//95 mmHg). The trajectories of creatinine were modeled through a flexible latent class mixed model. The analysis identified three classes of significantly different trajectories. In the first (n = 560), there was no significant variation of creatinine over time. In the second (n = 40), there was a significant rise of creatinine (117 ± 20 vs 85 ± 17 µmol/l, p < 0.0001). The third class (n = 9) was very heterogeneous, mainly composed of outliers. Further analysis showed the nonlinearity of the evolution of creatinine in classes 2 and 3. So the model of progressive renal deterioration in essential hypertension does not fit with our results. A large majority (92%) of patients show no significant change in creatinine level with time. In the others 8%, the increase in creatinine is not progressive but conversely show one or more sudden bouts of elevation.

Background: Orthostatic hypotension, blood pressure (BP) variability, and arterial stiffness are three markers of cardiovascular risk beyond the average BP. However, the relationships between these three parameters are not well known., Aim: To examine the relationships between orthostatic hypotension, BP variability, and arterial stiffness., Methods and Results: In the Three-City study, a sample of 1151 elderly participants (mean age = 80 ± 3 years) was screened for orthostatic hypotension, undertook home BP and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements. We performed logistic regression analyses to look at the associations between orthostatic hypotension and both day-to-day (D-to-D) BP variability quartiles and PWV quartiles. Orthostatic hypotension was detected in 210 participants who were more likely to be hypertensive, exhibit higher BP variability and have increased arterial stiffness. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the frequency of orthostatic hypotension increased by 20% with every quartile of D-to-D SBP variability and by 20% with every quartile of PWV. PWV and D-to-D BP variability were not associated. In stratified analysis, the use of beta-blocker changes these relationships: orthostatic hypotension was not associated to PWV anymore but its association with D-to-D SBP variability was apparently stronger., Conclusion: In this large sample of elderly individuals, orthostatic hypotension was independently associated with both BP variability and PWV. BP variability being more indicative of a baroreflex dysfunction and PWV being a marker of vascular ageing, these two components would participate to the orthostatic hypotension mechanisms.

Background and Aims: Surgery for pheochromocytoma (PCC) can cause excessive catecholamine release with severe hypertension. Alpha blockade is the mainstay of preoperative management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of intra-venous (IV) urapidil, a competitive short acting α1 receptor antagonist, in the prevention of peri-operative hemodynamic instability of patients with PCC., Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 75 patients (79 PCC) for PCC removal surgery from 2001 to 2017 at the Bordeaux University Hospital. They received, 3 days before surgery, continuous intravenous infusion of urapidil with stepwise increase to the maximum tolerated dose. Urapidil was maintained during the procedure and stopped after clamping the adrenal vein. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were measured during surgery. Hypertensive peaks (SAP >160 mmHg) and tachycardia >100 beats/min were treated with boluses of nicardipine 2 mg and esmolol 0.5 mg/kg., Results: We recorded 20/79 (25%) cases with systolic arterial pressure (SAP) >180 mmHg. Only 11/79 (14%) had hypotension with SAP <80 mmHg. Peaks of catecholamine secretions were observed preferentially during peritoneal insufflation and tumor dissection ( P < 0.05). A correlation was found between tumor size (mm) and the highest norepinephrine levels [ r = 0.288, P = 0.015], and between hypertensive peaks (mmHg) and the highest norepinephrine levels [ r = 0.45, P = 0.017]. No mortality was reported. The median [range] postoperative hospital stay was 4 [2-9] days., Conclusion: IV urapidil limits hypertensive and hypotensive peaks during PCC surgery, and corresponds to surgical imperatives allowing a short hospital stay, due to its "on-off" effect., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology.)

Malignant hypertension has not disappeared, it has been forgotten. Its incidence is increasing again. It considerably worsens the prognosis of young patients (35 to 55 years old on average). There might be susceptibility factors, several hypotheses are under study. New diagnostic criteria and therapeutic options have been proposed and will have to be validated. Faced with these important challenges for patients, the first prospective multicentric register on this pathology will be set up in France in September 2019., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Clinic-ambulatory blood pressure (BP) difference is influenced by patients- and device-related factors and inadequate clinic-BP measurement. We investigated whether nonadherence to antihypertensive medications may also influence this difference in a post hoc analysis of the DENERHTN trial (Renal Denervation for Hypertension). We pooled the data of 77 out of 106 evaluable patients with apparent resistant hypertension who received a standardized antihypertensive treatment and had both ambulatory BP and drug-screening results available at baseline after 1 month of standardized triple therapy and at 6 months on a median of 5 antihypertensive drugs. After drug assay samplings on study visits, patients took their antihypertensive treatment under supervision immediately after the start of the ambulatory BP recording, and supine clinic BP was measured 24 hours post-dosing; both allowed to calculate the clinic minus daytime ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) difference (clinic-SBP-day-SBP). A total of 29 (37.7%) were found nonadherent to medications at baseline and 38 (49.4%) at 6 months. At baseline, the mean clinic-SBP-day-SBP difference in the nonadherent group was 12.7 mm Hg (95% CI, 7.8-17.7 mm Hg, P <0.001). In contrast, clinic SBP was almost identical to day-SBP in the adherent group (clinic-SBP-day-SBP difference, 0.1 mm Hg; 95% CI, -3.3 to 3.5 mm Hg; P =0.947). Similar observations were made at 6 months. Using receiver operating characteristics curves, we found that a 6 mm Hg cutoff of clinic-SBP-day-SBP difference had 67% sensitivity and 69% specificity to predict nonadherence to the triple therapy at baseline. In conclusion, a large clinic-SBP-day-SBP difference may help discriminating between adherence and nonadherence to treatment in patients with resistant hypertension. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01570777.

Objective: Orthostatic hypotension is a common condition associated with adverse cardiovascular and cognitive prognosis. Screening for orthostatic hypotension consists of blood pressure measurements in supine (or sitting) and standing position during clinical consultations. As orthostatic hypotension is a poorly reproducible clinical condition, it is likely that the simple measurement carried out during consultations underestimates the true prevalence of the condition. The objective of this study is, therefore, to determine whether screening for orthostatic hypotension with home blood pressure measurements (HBPM) may improve orthostatic hypotension diagnosis without compromising the quality of the blood pressure readings., Materials and Methods: We asked all patients with indications for HBPM in the hypertension unit and in a general medical practice to perform a series of home blood pressure measurements, ending each series with a measurement in standing position., Results: We recruited 505 patients of mean age 68 years of which 93% were hypertensive patients. The success rate of HBPM complying with the ESH criteria (12 out of 18 measurements) was 94.5%, which is comparable with previously published series of measurements. Ninety-one percent of patients measured their blood pressure at least once in standing position, and 88% of patients recorded all six standing measurements. Orthostatic hypotension prevalence defined as the presence of one episode of orthostatic hypotension was 37.47%, much higher than orthostatic hypotension prevalence measured in the same cohort in a clinic setting (15%)., Conclusion: The measurement of blood pressure in standing position during HBPM is feasible without altering the quality of the blood pressure readings in seated position. Our findings show that orthostatic hypotension is significantly more often detected at home by the patient than at the doctor's office, which may allow quicker initiation of preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Background: Malignant hypertension, the most severe form of hypertension, is defined by high blood pressure and acute ischemic organ damage. It has a worse prognosis than other forms of hypertension, especially in black patients. New tools to assess organ damage, especially that of the heart and brain, are now available and may contribute to a better evaluation of these patients. This report improves knowledge of the characteristics of involved organs to facilitate diagnosis and to evaluate the effectiveness of our treatment protocol., Method: The Bordeaux registry, started in 1995, recruited 168 patients. In addition to evaluations of their eyes and kidneys, these patients had a systematic evaluation of their hearts with ECG and echocardiography and, since 2007, a systematic brain MRI. Blood pressure was lowered with a protocol based on blockers of the renin-angiotensin system started at a very low-dose with forced titration over 48 h. Only an oral route was used for antihypertensive medication., Results: Systematic MRIs found significant brain damage in 93% of patients. Heart involvement was highly prevalent: 82% had left ventricular mass more than 60 g/m, and 56% had systolic dysfunction (estimated by global longitudinal strain). Renal involvement and thrombotic microangiopathy were respectively present in 55 and 15% of patients. Median follow-up was 48 months. Renal survival at 5 years was 90.8%, similar to other studies., Conclusion: Malignant hypertension is a systemic disease causing severe damage to the brain, heart, kidneys and eyes, even in absence of symptoms. Renin-angiotensin system blockers seem to be the cornerstone of treatment.

Hypertensive emergencies are those situations where very high blood pressure (BP) values are associated with acute organ damage, and therefore, require immediate, but careful, BP reduction. The type of acute organ damage is the principal determinant of: (i) the drug of choice, (ii) the target BP, and (iii) the timeframe in which BP should be lowered. Key target organs are the heart, retina, brain, kidneys, and large arteries. Patients who lack acute hypertension-mediated end organ damage do not have a hypertensive emergency and can usually be treated with oral BP-lowering agents and usually discharged after a brief period of observation.

Objective: Primary hyperaldosteronism is the leading cause of secondary hypertension, and leads to frequent cardiovascular complications. Many studies have studied left ventricular geometry and function in this population, but longitudinal systolic function is still poorly described., Methods: We studied 35 hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism, and 35 with essential hypertension matched for age, sex, body mass index, and 24h blood pressure. Patients benefited from an echocardiography to measure the mass and the geometry of the left ventricle, left ventricle ejection fraction, systolic longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain, and diastolic function., Results: Compared to essential hypertensive patients, patients with primary aldosteronism presented a significantly higher left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness (60.3±16.1g/m 2 vs 47.3±18.6, P=0.003, and 0.44±0.08 vs 0.36±0.06, P=0.00005, respectively), as well as a significantly reduced longitudinal systolic strain (-17.8±3,4 vs -20.3±3,6%, P=0.004). There were no significant differences in the other parameters., Conclusions: Primary aldosteronism is associated with a deterioration of longitudinal systolic function of the left ventricle compared with essential hypertensive patients. This marker of cardiac damage, reproducible and easily available in routine could help for the screening of these patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Predictive factors associated with normal blood pressure (BP) after unilateral adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism (PA) are not clearly identified., Aims: To evaluate the predictive value of arterial stiffness before surgery on BP after surgery., Methods: During 2009-2013, 96 patients with PA due to unilateral adrenal adenoma who underwent surgery were enrolled in a multicentre open-label, prospective study. Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) was assessed before surgery. Patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) before surgery and 6 and 12months after surgery. Twenty-four h SBP/DBP values were compared in subjects with PWV

Hypertensive emergency. Stable incidence for several decades or even increasing (under diagnosed). Early and specific management improves prognosis. Absence of eye damage or lack of access to fundus should not delay or prevent the diagnosis. Multi Organ Damage Hypertension: new definition for an old entity: unusual, sudden and persistent blood pressure rise without threshold and ocular involvement or involvement of at least 3 target organs among brain, heart, kidney or endothelial disease., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Central blood pressure (BP) is a promising marker to identify subjects with higher cardiovascular risk than expected by traditional risk factors. Significant results have been obtained in populations with high cardiovascular risk, but little is known about low-cardiovascular-risk patients, although the differences between central and peripheral BP (amplification) are usually greater in this population. The study aim was to evaluate central BP over 24 hours for cardiovascular event prediction in hypertensive subjects with low cardiovascular risk., Methods and Results: Peripheral and central BPs were recorded during clinical visits and over 24 hours in hypertensive patients with low cardiovascular risk (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation ≤5%). Our primary end point is the occurrence of a cardiovascular event during follow-up. To assess the potential interest in central pulse pressure over 24 hours, we performed Cox proportional hazard models analysis and comparison of area under the curves using the contrast test for peripheral and central BP. A cohort of 703 hypertensive subjects from Bordeaux were included. After the first 24 hours of BP measurement, the subjects were then followed up for an average of 112.5±70 months. We recorded 65 cardiovascular events during follow-up. Amplification was found to be significantly associated with cardiovascular events when added to peripheral 24-hour pulse pressure ( P =0.0259). The area under the curve of 24-hour central pulse pressure is significantly more important than area under the curve of office BP ( P =0.0296), and there is a trend of superiority with the area under the curve of peripheral 24-hour pulse pressure., Conclusions: Central pulse pressure over 24 hours improves the prediction of cardiovascular events for hypertensive patients with low cardiovascular risk compared to peripheral pulse pressure., (© 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

The hypothesis that vitamin D (25(OH)D) insufficiency plays a role in occurring of various disease has led to a rise in requests of dosages and to an increase of health-care costs. 25(OH)D insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and hypertension in many studies. Animal studies demonstrated that 25(OH)D insufficiency activates renin angiotensin system but corresponding humans data are limited. The aim of the study was to document relationship between 25(OH)D, blood pressure, and renin angiotensin system in hypertensive subjects. In all, 248 hypertensive individuals, 46.8 years (±14), were hospitalized for an etiological assessment of hypertension in this cross-sectional study over two calendar years. 25(OH)D, plasma renin activity, and aldosterone were determined in stringent conditions and blood pressure was measure. Statistical analyses were carried out to analyze the association between 25(OH)D, blood pressure, and renin angiotensin system using linear and logistic regressions with adjustments on relevant variables. In all, 80% of the studied population had a 25(OH)D insufficiency. There were no significant association between 25(OH)D and levels of systolic or diastolic blood pressure, plasma renin activity, and aldosterone whatever the statiscal method used after adjustment. 25(OH)D is not associated with blood pressure and renin angiontensin component in hypertensive subjects. These results corroborate the interventional studies which are for a large majority negatives. A new definition of the 25(OH)D insufficiency in general population is necessary.

Background: The DENERHTN (Renal Denervation for Hypertension) trial confirmed the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) in lowering daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure when added to standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment (SSAHT) for resistant hypertension at 6 months., Methods and Results: This post hoc exploratory analysis assessed the impact of abdominal aortic calcifications (AAC) on the hemodynamic and renal response to RDN at 6 months. In total, 106 patients with resistant hypertension were randomly assigned to RDN plus SSAHT or to the same SSAHT alone (control group). Total AAC volume was measured, with semiautomatic software and blind to randomization, from the aortic hiatus to the iliac bifurcation using the prerandomization noncontrast abdominal computed tomography scans of 90 patients. Measurements were expressed as tertiles. The baseline-adjusted difference in the change in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline to 6 months between the RDN and control groups was -10.1 mm Hg ( P =0.0462) in the lowest tertile and -2.5 mm Hg ( P =0.4987) in the 2 highest tertiles of AAC volume. Estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable at 6 months for the patients in the lowest tertile of AAC volume who underwent RDN (+2.5 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ) but decreased in the control group (-8.0 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 , P =0.0148). In the 2 highest tertiles of AAC volume, estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased similarly in the RDN and control groups ( P =0.2640)., Conclusions: RDN plus SSAHT resulted in a larger decrease in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure than SSAHT alone in patients with a lower AAC burden than in those with a higher AAC burden. This larger decrease in daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure was not associated with a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01570777., (© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)