1. Assessing the Risk of Interfacility Transport in Pregnant Patients Due to Progression of Labor: Lessons From a Specialized Maternal-Fetal Transport Program.
- Author
-
Lardaro T, Balaji A, Yang D, Kuhn D, Glober N, Brent CM, Couturier K, Breyre A, Vaizer J, and Hunter BR
- Abstract
Background Pregnant laboring patients sometimes require interfacility transfer to a higher level of care. There is a paucity of evidence to inform when it is safe to transfer a laboring patient and when delivery may be too imminent to transfer. Methods This is a retrospective study of pregnant patients undergoing interfacility transfer with a specialized obstetric transport team deployed from a large Midwest regional healthcare system. The primary outcome was delivery prior to or within one hour of arrival at the receiving institution due to progression of labor. Data collected included basic demographics, vital signs, gravidity, parity, gestational age, contraction frequency if contractions were present, and cervical dilation. We sought to define the association between these variables and the primary outcome to inform risk assessment for precipitous delivery among patients being considered for interfacility transfer. Results Of the 370 pregnant patients for whom the specialized transfer team was requested, 11 (3%) met the primary outcome. Those with more advanced cervical dilation and those who did not receive regular prenatal care were more likely to meet the criteria for the primary outcome. For every centimeter of cervical dilation, the odds of meeting the primary outcome increased 2.3-fold (95% CI: 1.5-3.4). Conclusions We identified risk factors for early delivery among pregnant patients for whom an interfacility transfer was requested and described patients who were high-risk for obstetric interfacility transport due to the progression of labor. Our results can help inform risk assessments for transferring potentially high-risk laboring patients., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Indiana University Institutional Review Board issued approval 20146. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Lardaro et al.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF