Search

Background: Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) causes the sexually transmitted disease gonorrhoea. There are no vaccines and infections are treated principally with antibiotics. However, gonococci rapidly develop resistance to every antibiotic class used and there is a need for developing new antimicrobial treatments. In this study we focused on two gonococcal enzymes as potential antimicrobial targets, namely the serine protease L,D-carboxypeptidase LdcA (NgO1274/NEIS1546) and the lytic transglycosylase LtgD (NgO0626/NEIS1212). To identify compounds that could interact with these enzymes as potential antimicrobials, we used the AtomNet virtual high-throughput screening technology. We then did a computational modelling study to examine the interactions of the most bioactive compounds with their target enzymes. The identified compounds were tested against gonococci to determine minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (MIC/MBC), specificity, and compound toxicity in vitro., Results: AtomNet identified 74 compounds that could potentially interact with Ng-LdcA and 84 compounds that could potentially interact with Ng-LtgD. Through MIC and MBC assays, we selected the three best performing compounds for both enzymes. Compound 16 was the most active against Ng-LdcA, with a MIC50 value < 1.56 µM and MBC50/90 values between 0.195 and 0.39 µM. In general, the Ng-LdcA compounds showed higher activity than the compounds directed against Ng-LtgD, of which compound 45 had MIC50 values of 1.56-3.125 µM and MBC50/90 values between 3.125 and 6.25 µM. The compounds were specific for gonococci and did not kill other bacteria. They were also non-toxic for human conjunctival epithelial cells as judged by a resazurin assay. To support our biological data, in-depth computational modelling study detailed the interactions of the compounds with their target enzymes. Protein models were generated in silico and validated, the active binding sites and amino acids involved elucidated, and the interactions of the compounds interacting with the enzymes visualised through molecular docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulations for 50 ns and Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA)., Conclusions: We have identified bioactive compounds that appear to target the N. gonorrhoeae LdcA and LtgD enzymes. By using a reductionist approach involving biological and computational data, we propose that compound Ng-LdcA-16 and Ng-LtgD-45 are promising anti-gonococcal compounds for further development., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Acne is very common, can cause considerable negative impact on quality of life and there is increasing concern over the use of long courses of oral antibiotics for this condition., Objectives: (1) To critically appraise reporting in acne guidelines and compare this with previous systematic review of acne guidelines. (2) Examine acne treatment guidance on pre-specified acne treatments of interest and compare between acne guidelines., Methods: Searches for new or updated guidelines were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar, LILACS from 1 January 2017 to 31 July 2021, supplemented by searching a guideline-specific depository and checking for updates to guidelines included in previous review. We included guidelines, consensus statements or care protocols on the medical treatment of acne vulgaris in adults and/or children and excluded those that focused on a single intervention or subgroup of acne, regional adaptations of guidelines or guidelines included in previous review. AGREE II checklist was applied to critically appraise reporting of guidelines. Results were synthesised narratively., Results: Of 807 abstracts identified nine guidelines were identified that were eligible for inclusion. All guidelines had AGREE II scores above average in at least one domain and reporting was substantially improved compared to the systematic review of acne carried out 5 years previously. There was consensus between guidelines on the key role of topical treatments as first-line acne treatment and most recommended continuing topical treatments as maintenance therapy. There was considerable variation between guidelines on classification of severity, indications for commencing oral antibiotics and on maximum duration of oral antibiotics. However, there was consensus on the need for co-prescription of a non-antibiotic topical treatment when using oral antibiotics. There were notable differences on recommendations regarding provision of information for patients on how to use topical treatments or how to mitigate against side effects., Conclusions: Substantial differences in classification of acne severity hampered comparisons between guidelines. Although development and reporting of guidelines has improved over the past 5 years, differences in key recommendations remain, possibly reflecting uncertainties in the underlying evidence base. Differences between guidelines could have substantial implications for prevalence of antibiotic prescribing for acne., Competing Interests: Alison M. Layton has provided unrestricted educational talks or acted as a consultant on research developments for Proctor & Gamble, Galderma Pharmaceuticals, La Roche‐Posay, Leo Pharma, Novartis, L’Oreal, Beiersdorf and Origimm. She is currently a member of the British Association of Dermatologists Retinoid Working Group. She chairs a National UK Acne Group and is a member of the Personalising Acne Consensus of Experts which has superseded the Acne Global Alliance implemented to improve outcomes in acne management. The latter 2 groups are supported by Galderma Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declare that they have no known conflicts of interest., (© 2023 The Authors. Skin Health and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)