Search

Background: Compared to intensive care unit patients with SARS-CoV-2 negative acute respiratory tract infections, patients with SARS-CoV-2 are supposed to develop more frequently and more severely neurologic sequelae. Delirium and subsequent neurocognitive deficits (NCD) have implications for patients' morbidity and mortality. However, the extent of brain injury during acute COVID-19 and subsequent NCD still remain largely unexplored. Body-fluid biomarkers may offer valuable insights into the quantification of acute delirium, brain injury and may help to predict subsequent NCD following COVID-19., Methods: In a multicenter, observational case-control study, conducted across four German University Hospitals, hospitalized adult and pediatric patients with an acute COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls presenting with acute respiratory tract infections were included. Study procedures comprised the assessment of pre-existing neurocognitive function, daily screening for delirium, neurological examination and blood sampling. Fourteen biomarkers indicative of neuroaxonal, glial, neurovascular injury and inflammation were analyzed. Neurocognitive functions were re-evaluated after three months., Results: We enrolled 118 participants (90 adults, 28 children). The incidence of delirium [85 out of 90 patients (94.4%) were assessable for delirium) was comparable between patients with COVID-19 [16 out of 61 patients (26.2%)] and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls [8 out of 24 patients (33.3%); p > 0.05] across adults and children. No differences in outcomes as measured by the modified Rankin Scale, the Short-Blessed Test, the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, and the pediatrics cerebral performance category scale were observed after three months. Levels of body-fluid biomarkers were generally elevated in both adult and pediatric cohorts, without significant differences between SARS-CoV-2 negative controls and COVID-19. In COVID-19 patients experiencing delirium, levels of GFAP and MMP-9 were significantly higher compared to those without delirium., Conclusions: Delirium and subsequent NCD are not more frequent in COVID-19 as compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative patients with acute respiratory tract infections. Consistently, biomarker levels of brain injury indicated no differences between COVID-19 cases and SARS-CoV-2 negative controls. Our data suggest that delirium in COVID-19 does not distinctly trigger substantial and persistent subsequent NCD compared to patients with other acute respiratory tract infections., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04359914; date of registration 24-APR 2020., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Advances in spine surgery enable safe interventions in elderly patients, but perioperative neurocognitive disorders (pNCD), such as post-operative delirium (POD) and cognitive dysfunction (POCD), remain a serious concern. Pre-operative cognitive impairment is a major risk factor for pNCD. Comprehensive pre-operative cognitive assessments are not feasible in clinical practice, making effective screening methods desirable. This study investigates whether pre-operative cerebrovascular duplex sonography can assess subcortical (vascular) cognitive impairment and the risk for POD., Methods: This prospective single-center study recruited patients aged ≥60 years scheduled for elective spine surgery at a German university hospital. Patients underwent pre-operative assessments including cognitive abilities (CERAD test battery), structural MRI, and cerebrovascular duplex sonography. POD screening was conducted three times daily for at least 3 days. The primary hypothesis, that the mean pulsatility index (PI) of both internal carotid arteries (ICA) predicts POD risk, was tested using logistic regression. Secondary analyses examined the association between POD risk and ICA flow (time-averaged peak velocities, TAPV) and correlations with cognitive profiles and MRI characteristics., Results: POD occurred in 22% of patients ( n  = 22/99) within three postoperative days. Patients with POD were significantly older (75.9 ± 5.4 vs. 70.0 ± 6.9 years, p  < 0.01) but did not differ by gender ( p  = 0.51). ICA PI significantly predicted POD risk (OR = 5.46 [95%CI: 1.81-16.49], p  = 0.003), which remained significant after adjustment for age and duration of surgery (OR adj  = 6.38 [95% CI: 1.77-23.03], p  = 0.005). TAPV did not inform the POD risk ( p  = 0.68). ICA PI Pre-operative cognitive scores were significantly associated with ICA PI (mean CERAD score: r  = -0.32, p  < 0.001). ICA PI was also significantly associated with total white matter lesion volume ( τ  = 0.19, p  = 0.012) and periventricular white matter lesion volume ( τ  = 0.21, p  = 0.007)., Discussion: This is the first study to demonstrate that cerebrovascular duplex sonography can assess the risk for POD in elderly spine surgery patients. Increased ICA PI may indicate subcortical impairment, larger white matter lesion load, and lower white matter volume, predisposing factors for POD. Pre-operative cerebrovascular duplex sonography of the ICA is widely available, easy-to-use, and efficient, offering a promising screening method for POD risk. Increased ICA PI could supplement established predictors like age to adjust surgical and peri-operative procedures to individual risk profiles., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Saar, Müller, Veser, Behr, Rathmann, Schroeder, Flöel, Müller, von Sarnowski and Fleischmann.)

Objective: The role of ipsilateral descending motor pathways in voluntary movement of humans is still a matter of debate, with partly contradictory results. The aim of our study therefore was to examine the excitability of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs) regarding site and the specificity for unilateral and bilateral elbow flexion extension tasks., Methods: MR-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping of the dominant hemisphere was performed in twenty healthy participants during tonic unilateral (iBB), bilateral homologous (bBB) or bilateral antagonistic elbow flexion-extension (iBB-cAE), the map center of gravity (CoG) and iMEP area from BB were obtained., Results: The map CoG of the ipsilateral BB was located more anterior-laterally than the hotspot of the contralateral BB within the primary motor cortex, with a significant difference in CoG in iBB and iBB-cAE, but not bBB compared to the hotspot for the contralateral BB (each p < 0.05). However, different tasks had no effect on the size of the iMEPs., Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that excitability of ipsilateral and contralateral MEP differ spatially in a task-specific manner suggesting the involvement of different motor networks within the motor cortex., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The ORAL Surveillance trial found a dose-dependent increase in venous thromboembolism (VTE) and pulmonary embolism (PE) events with tofacitinib versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). We aimed to assess VTE incidence over time and explore risk factors of VTE, including disease activity, in ORAL Surveillance., Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged 50 years or older with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or TNFi. Post hoc, cumulative probabilities and incidence rates (patients with first events/100 patient-years) by 6-month intervals were estimated for adjudicated VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and PE. Cox regression models identified risk factors. Clinical Disease Activity Index leading up to the event was explored in patients with VTE., Results: Cumulative probabilities for VTE and PE were higher with tofacitinib 10 mg BID, but not 5 mg BID, versus TNFi. Incidence rates were consistent across 6-month intervals within treatments. Across treatments, risk factors for VTE included prior VTE, body mass index greater than or equal to 35 kg/m 2 , older age, and history of chronic lung disease. At the time of the event, most patients with VTE had active disease as defined by Clinical Disease Activity Index., Conclusion: Incidences of VTE and PE were higher with tofacitinib (10 > 5 mg BID) versus TNFi and were generally consistent over time. Across treatments, VTE risk factors were aligned with previous studies in the general RA population. These data highlight the importance of assessing VTE risk factors, including age, body mass index, and VTE history, when considering initiation of tofacitinib or TNFi in patients with active RA., (© 2024 Pfizer Inc and The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Background and Purpose: Fatigue affects patients across a variety of neurological diseases, including chronic pain syndromes such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). In CRPS, fatigue is often underestimated, as the focus lies in the assessment and managing of pain and sensorimotor deficits. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, characteristics, and influence of fatigue on CRPS severity and quality of life in these patients. Such insights could enhance the clinical management of this challenging condition., Methods: In this prospective study, 181 CRPS patients and 141 age and gender-matched individuals with injury but without chronic pain were interviewed using the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Function to assess fatigue. Depressive symptoms and quality of life (QoL) were also evaluated as additional outcome measures. Statistical analysis was performed to examine differences in fatigue prevalence between the groups, as well as associations with CRPS severity, pain levels, and clinical phenotype. In addition, best subsets regression was used to identify the primary factors influencing QoL. Fatigue was tested in a mediation analysis as a mediator between pain and depression., Results: CRPS patients showed significantly higher fatigue levels compared to controls (CRPS: 75 [IQR: 57-85] vs. controls: 39 [IQR: 25-57]). Based on the FSMC, 44.2% in the control group experienced fatigue, while 85% of patients with CRPS experienced fatigue (p < 0.001), of which 6% were mild, 15% moderate, and 67% severe. In CRPS severe fatigue was associated with higher pain intensities compared to no fatigue (pain at rest: p = 0.003; pain during movement: p = 0.007) or moderate fatigue (pain during movement: p = 0.03). QoL in our cohort was mainly influenced by pain (pain during movement: adj.R 2  = 0.38; p < 0.001, pain at rest: Δadj.R 2  = 0.02, p = 0.007) and depressive symptoms (Δadj.R 2  = 0.12, p < 0.001). Subsequent analyses indicated that pain and depressive symptoms primarily impact QoL in CPRS whereas fatigue may exert an indirect influence by mediating the connection between pain and depression (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: This pioneering study investigates the prevalence of fatigue in CRPS patients and its relation to disease characteristics. Our results indicate a high prevalence of severe fatigue, strongly correlated with pain intensity, and its importance in the interaction between pain and depression in CRPS. These findings underscore the significant role of fatigue as a disease factor in CRPS. Therefore, the evaluation of CRPS-related disability should include a standardized assessment of fatigue for comprehensive clinical management., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib over 5 years among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a long-term extension (LTE) of the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial., Methods: Patients refractory to ≥1 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) received upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily or placebo, in combination with background conventional synthetic DMARD(s). At week 12, patients randomised to placebo were switched to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg. All patients who completed the week 24 visit could enter the LTE for up to 5 years. Efficacy was analysed as observed and by non-responder imputation through week 260. Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years were summarised over 5 years., Results: Of the 498 patients randomised, 418 (84%) completed week 24 and entered the LTE. Of those who remained in the trial (n=80, upadacitinib 15 mg; n=81, upadacitinib 30 mg), 36%/36% and 81%/77% randomised to upadacitinib 15/30 mg were in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission or low disease activity at week 260, respectively (as observed). Approximately 47% of all patients who began in high disease activity demonstrated a CDAI improvement >12 at week 260 with upadacitinib 15/30 mg. Functional and pain-related outcomes also showed comparable improvements with both doses. Numerically higher rates of anaemia, herpes zoster and creatine phosphokinase elevation were observed with upadacitinib 30 mg vs 15 mg. No new safety issues were identified., Conclusions: Upadacitinib 15/30 mg continued to be effective in treating clinical and functional outcomes in patients with RA. The safety profile observed over 5 years was consistent with earlier study-specific and integrated assessments of upadacitinib treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RF: research grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer-Ingleheim, Flexion, Galapagos, Galvani, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Priovant, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB. CC-S: research grants from AbbVie, BMS, CSL Behring, Priovant Therapeutics, Alexion and Pfizer; consultant for AbbVie, Priovant Therapeutics, Octapharma, BMS, Recludix, Pfizer, Gilead and Regeneron-Sanofi. BC: consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Nordic, Pfizer. SH: research grants and consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB and Novartis. AR-R: consulting fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Lilly, BMS and Sanofi; honoraria from AbbVie, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, BMS, Lilly, Gilead and Roche; payment for expert testimony from AbbVie and Gilead; support for travel or meeting attendance from Sanofi, Roche, Janssen, Pfizer and AbbVie; and compensation for participation on a data safety monitoring board from R-Pharm. HSC, NK, KMC and SM: employees of AbbVie and may hold stock or options., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To evaluate the long-term sustainability of response to the Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response or intolerance to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) in the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial., Methods: Patients on background conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) were treated once daily with upadacitinib 15 mg or placebo. Patients who completed the week 24 visit could enter a long-term extension of up to 5 years. The sustainability of response was assessed based on achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Disease Activity Score 28-joint count using C-reactive protein (DAS28 (CRP)) targets and evaluated up to week 260 in all patients receiving the approved upadacitinib 15 mg dose, including those randomised to upadacitinib 15 mg and those who switched from placebo to upadacitinib 15 mg at week 12., Results: In this bDMARD-IR population, 45% (n=104/229) and 79% (n=172/219) of patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg plus background csDMARD(s) achieved CDAI remission or CDAI low disease activity (LDA) at any point during the 5-year study, respectively. Of those who achieved CDAI remission/LDA, 25%/43% maintained their initial response through 240 weeks of follow-up after first achieving response. Most patients who lost remission or LDA were able to recapture that response by the cut-off date. Similar overall results were observed for SDAI and DAS28 (CRP). No strong predictors of response were identified., Conclusions: Over three-quarters of bDMARD-IR patients achieved CDAI LDA with upadacitinib, and almost half of those maintained LDA through 240 weeks of follow-up. Remission was achieved by nearly half of all patients and maintained in approximately a quarter of those achieving remission., Trial Registration Number: NCT02706847., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RFvV: Research support from BMS and UCB; support for educational programmes from AstraZeneca, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB; consultancy for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, RemeGen and UCB; speaker for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer and UCB. SH: Research grants and consultancy fees from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB and Novartis. AFW: Research support, speakers' bureau and consulting fees from AbbVie. RF: research grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer-Ingleheim, Dren Bio, Flexion, Galapagos, Galvani, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Priovant, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB and Vyne. YS, SM and OT: Employees of AbbVie and may hold stock or options., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The MHLC-C is a condition-specific instrument measuring the internal and external loci of control beliefs, adaptable to various health conditions. Translated into Swedish and Chinese, this study aims to translate the MHLC-C into German using the FACID-Method. The English version is validated and reliable; the German version requires these validation steps.

Background: New onset or worsening of a headache disorder substantially contributes to the disease burden of post-COVID-19. Its management poses a suitable means to enhance patients' participation in professional, social, and personal activities. Unfortunately, the pathophysiology of post-COVID-19 headaches is poorly understood. This study aims to investigate the role of (neuro-) inflammatory mechanisms in order to guide the development of anti-inflammatory treatment strategies., Methods: We included patients from the interdisciplinary post-COVID-19 Rehabilitation Study (PoCoRe, n = 184 patients) run at a tertiary care university hospital, comprising patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection ≥ 6 weeks prior to their initial consultation. Patients reporting any headache since their infection were considered for this study (n = 93). These were interviewed and classified according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3) by headache specialists. Patient sera were additionally analysed for levels of VILIP-1, MCP-1 (CCL2), sTREM-2, BDNF, TGF-ß1, VEGF, IL-6, sTREM-1, ß-NGF, IL-18, TNF-alpha, sRAGE, and CX3CL1 (Fractalkine). Markers of inflammation were compared between four groups of patients (none, unchanged, worsened, or new headache disorder)., Results: Patients reported experiencing more severe headaches (n = 17), new onset headaches (n = 46), unchanged headaches (n = 18), and surprisingly, some patients denied having any headaches (n = 12) despite self-reports. Serum levels of CX3CL1 were increased in the worsened (2145 [811-4866] pg/ml) and new onset (1668 [0-7357] pg/ml) headache group as compared to patients with no (1129 [0-5379] pg/ml) or unchanged (1478 [346-4332] pg/ml) headaches. Other markers also differed between groups, but most significantly between patients with worsened (TGF-ß1: 60 [0-310] pg/ml, VEGF: 328 [86-842] pg/ml, ß-NGF: 6 [3-38] pg/ml) as compared to unchanged headaches (TGF-ß1: 29 [0-77] pg/ml, VEGF: 183 [72-380] pg/ml, ß-NGF: 3 [2-89] pg/ml). The results did not differ between headache phenotypes., Discussion: This study provides evidence that worsened or new headaches following COVID-19 are associated with pro-(neuro-)inflammatory profiles. This supports the use of anti-inflammatory treatment options in this population, especially in the subacute phase., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: This study aimed to describe the long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib and adalimumab through 228 weeks following immediate switch to the alternate therapy with a different mechanism of action (MoA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) not achieving treatment goals with their initial randomized therapy in the ongoing phase 3 SELECT-COMPARE study., Methods: Patients with non-response or incomplete response to initially prescribed upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or adalimumab 40 mg every other week were switched to the alternate therapy by week 26. Efficacy was evaluated through 228 weeks post-switch using validated outcome measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA; ≤ 10)/remission (≤ 2.8); 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein ≤ 3.2/< 2.6; ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria; and change from baseline in ACR core components. Data are reported as observed. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through week 264., Results: Of patients initially randomized to upadacitinib and adalimumab, 38.7% and 48.6%, respectively, switched to the alternate therapy by week 26. Clinically relevant improvements in all efficacy measures were observed through 228 weeks post-switch and were generally similar between groups, with small numeric differences mostly in favor of switching to upadacitinib. CDAI remission was achieved by 32.7% and 28.6% of initial non-responders, and 27.5% and 27.3% of incomplete responders, while CDAI LDA was achieved by 76.9% and 72.9% of non-responders, and 72.5% and 72.7% of incomplete responders switching to upadacitinib and to adalimumab, respectively. TEAE rates were similar between groups, although herpes zoster infection, lymphopenia, and creatine phosphokinase elevation were more frequent when switching to upadacitinib. No new safety signals were identified., Conclusion: Switching to a different MoA may provide long-term benefit to patients with RA not achieving treatment goals with their initial therapy, with acceptable safety profiles., Trial Registration: NCT02629159., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of upadacitinib versus adalimumab from SELECT-COMPARE over 5 years., Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate were randomised to receive upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg every other week, all with concomitant methotrexate. By week 26, patients with insufficient response to randomised treatment were rescued; patients remaining on placebo switched to upadacitinib. Patients completing the 48-week double-blind period could enter a long-term extension. Safety and efficacy were assessed through week 264, with radiographic progression analysed through week 192. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy was analysed by randomised group (non-responder imputation (NRI)) or treatment sequence (as observed)., Results: Rates of TEAEs were generally similar with upadacitinib versus adalimumab, although numerically higher rates of herpes zoster, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase elevation, hepatic disorder and non-melanoma skin cancer were reported with upadacitinib. Numerically greater proportions of patients randomised to upadacitinib versus adalimumab achieved clinical responses (NRI); Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (≤2.8) and Disease Activity Score based on C reactive protein <2.6 were achieved by 24.6% vs 18.7% (nominal p=0.042) and 31.8% vs 23.2% (nominal p=0.006), respectively. Radiographic progression was numerically lower with continuous upadacitinib versus adalimumab at week 192., Conclusion: The safety profile of upadacitinib through 5 years was consistent with the known safety profile of upadacitinib, with no new safety risks. Clinical responses were numerically higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab at 5 years. Upadacitinib demonstrates a favourable benefit-risk profile for long-term rheumatoid arthritis treatment., Trial Registration Number: NCT02629159., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RF has received consulting fees and/or grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, BI, Biosplice, BMS, Flexion, Galapagos, Galvani, Gilead, GSK, Horizon, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Selecta, UCB, Viela, Vorso and Vyne and has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Kiniksa. JS has received speaking fees, consulting fees and grant/research support from AbbVie, Accord, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz and UCB. SKP, XB, NK and YL are employees of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. PD has received speaker fees from AbbVie, Galapagos, Lilly, Nordimed and Thermofischer. LB has received speaking fees, consulting fees and grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Organon, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva and UCB. CGP is an employee and shareholder of Spire Sciences and has served as a consultant for Aclaris, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Five Prime, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Istesso, Labcorp, Lilly, Pacira, Paradigm, SetPoint, Sorrento, SynOx and UCB. YT has received speaker fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahikasei, AstraZeneca, BI, BMS, Chugai, Eisai, Gilead, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, Taiho and Taisho and research grants from Asahikasei, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Taisho. EM has received speaking fees, consulting fees and grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Hi-Bio, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz and Sanofi, and has received payment for expert testimony from AbbVie., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Eptinezumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP mAb) and is used for migraine prophylaxis. Efficacy data are mainly from clinical trials, real-world data are hardly available yet. Reimbursement policy in Germany leads to eptinezumab mainly being used in patients having failed pre-treatment with other CGRP mAb. To date, it is unclear whether eptinezumab is efficacious and well tolerated in this population and how the treatment response differs from patients who are naive to CGRP mAbs., Methods: We analysed clinical routine data of 79 patients (episodic migraine (EM): n = 19; chronic migraine (CM): n = 60) from four different centres in Germany. All patients were treated with eptinezumab (100mg). Differences in monthly headache (MHD), migraine (MMD) and acute medication days (AMD) after three months were analysed. The correlation of response with the number of CGRP mAb failures was evaluated. Significance level has been corrected (alpha = 0.017)., Results: After three months MHD, MMD and AMD were significantly reduced. In EM, the median reduction for MHD was 4.0 days (IQR: -6.5 to -1.0; p = 0.001), for MMD 3.0 days (IQR: -5.5 to -1.5; p < 0.001) and for AMD 2.0 days (IQR: -5.0 to -0.5; p = 0.006). In CM, median reduction of MHD was 4 days (IQR: -8.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001), 3.0 days (IQR: -6.0 to-1.0; p < 0.001) for MMD and 1.0 day (IQR: -5.0 to 0.0; p < 0.001) for AMD. All patients were resistant to conventional preventive therapies and most to CGRP mAbs. Fourteen patients had never received a CGRP mAb and 65 patients had received at least one mAb without sufficient effectiveness and/or intolerability (one: n = 20, two: n = 28, three: n = 17). There was a significant association between the number of prior therapies and the 30% MHD responder rate (none: 78.6%, one: 45.0%, two: 32.1%, three: 23.5%, p = 0.010). Regarding tolerability, 10.4% (8/77) reported mild side effects., Conclusions: The effectiveness of eptinezumab is significantly reduced in patients who have not previously responded to other CGRP mAbs. However, limitations such as the retrospective nature of the analysis, the small sample size and the short treatment period with only the lower dose of eptinezumab must be considered when interpreting the results., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: To date, migraine is diagnosed exclusively based on clinical criteria, but fluid biomarkers are desirable to gain insight into pathophysiological processes and inform clinical management. We investigated the state-dependent profile of fluid biomarkers for neuroaxonal damage and microglial activation as two potentially relevant aspects in human migraine pathophysiology., Methods: This exploratory study included serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples of patients with migraine during the headache phase (ictally) (n = 23), between attacks (interictally) (n = 16), and age/sex-matched controls (n = 19). Total Tau (t-Tau) protein, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) were measured with the Neurology 4-plex kit on a Single Molecule Array SR-X Analyzer (Simoa® SR-X, Quanterix Corp., Lexington, MA). Markers of microglial activation, C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CX3CL1) and soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2), were assessed using an immunoassay., Results: Concentrations of CX3CL1 but not sTREM2 were significantly increased both ictally and interictally in CSF but not in serum in comparison to the control cohort (p = 0.039). ROC curve analysis provided an AUC of 0.699 (95% CI 0.563 to 0.813, p = 0.007). T-Tau in serum but not in CSF was significantly increased in samples from patients taken during the headache phase, but not interictally (effect size: η 2  = 0.121, p = 0.038). ROC analysis of t-Tau protein in serum between ictal and interictal collected samples provided an AUC of 0.729 (95% CI 0.558 to 0.861, p = 0.006). The other determined biomarkers for axonal damage were not significantly different between the cohorts in either serum or CSF., Discussion: CX3CL1 in CSF is a novel potential fluid biomarker of migraine that is unrelated to the headache status. Serum t-Tau is linked to the headache phase but not interictal migraine. These data need to be confirmed in a larger hypothesis-driven prospective study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) is a member of the JAK kinase family of intracellular signalling molecules. By participating in signalling pathways downstream of type I interferons, IL-12, IL-23 and IL-10, TYK2 elicits a distinct set of immune events to JAK1, JAK2 and JAK3. TYK2 polymorphisms have been associated with susceptibility to various rheumatic diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis. In vitro and animal studies substantiate these findings, highlighting a role for TYK2 in diseases currently managed by antagonists of cytokines that signal through TYK2. Various inhibitors of TYK2 have now been studied in human disease, and one of these inhibitors, deucravacitinib, has now been approved for the treatment of psoriasis. Phase II trials of deucravacitinib have also reported positive results in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, with a preliminary safety profile that seems to differ from that of the JAK1, JAK2 and JAK3 inhibitors. Two other inhibitors of TYK2, brepocitinib and ropsacitinib, are also in earlier stages of clinical trials. Overall, TYK2 inhibitors hold promise for the treatment of a distinct spectrum of autoimmune diseases and could potentially have a safety profile that differs from other JAK inhibitors., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Neuroinflammation and maladaptive neuroplasticity play pivotal roles in migraine (MIG), trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TAC), and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Notably, CRPS shares connections with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in its pathophysiology. This study aims to assess if the documented links between CRPS and MIG/TAC in literature align with clinical phenotypes and disease progressions. This assessment may bolster the hypothesis of shared pathophysiological mechanisms., Methods: Patients with CRPS (n = 184) and an age-/gender-matched control group with trauma but without CRPS (n = 148) participated in this case-control study. Participant answered well-established questionnaires for the definition of CRPS symptoms, any headache complaints, headache entity, and clinical management., Results: Patients with CRPS were significantly more likely to suffer from migraine (OR: 3.23, 95% CI 1.82-5.85), TAC (OR: 8.07, 95% CI 1.33-154.79), or non-classified headaches (OR: 3.68, 95% CI 1.88-7.49) compared to the control group. Patients with MIG/TAC developed CRPS earlier in life (37.2 ± 11.1 vs 46.8 ± 13.5 years), had more often a central CRPS phenotype (60.6% vs. 37.0% overall) and were three times more likely to report allodynia compared to CRPS patients with other types of headaches. Additionally, these patients experienced higher pain levels and more severe CRPS, which intensified with an increasing number of headache days. Patients receiving monoclonal antibody treatment targeting the CGRP pathway for headaches reported positive effects on CRPS symptoms., Conclusion: This study identified clinically relevant associations of MIG/TAC and CRPS not explained by chance. Further longitudinal investigations exploring potentially mutual pathomechanisms may improve the clinical management of both CRPS and primary headache disorders., Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022961)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Patients with chronic daily headaches (CDH) are often a diagnostic challenge and frequently undergo neuroimaging. One common underlying cause of CDH is idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). However, certain neuroimaging abnormalities that suggest IIH, such as optic nerve sheath diameters (ONSD), pituitary gland height, and venous sinus diameter, require interpretation due to the absence of established normative values. Notably, intracranial pressure is known to varies with age, sex and weight, further complicating the determination of objectively abnormal findings within a specific patient group. This study aims to assist clinical neuroradiologists in differentiating neuroimaging results in CDH by providing weight-adjusted normative values for imaging characteristics of IIH. In addition to age and BMI we here assessed 1924 population-based T1-weighted MRI datasets of healthy participants for relevant MRI aspects of IIH. Association to BMI was analyzed using linear/logistic regression controlled for age and stratified for sex. ONSD was 4.3 mm [2.8; 5.9]/4.6 mm [3.6; 5.7] and diameter of transverse sinus was 4.67 mm [1.6; 6.5]/4.45 mm [3.0; 7.9]. Height of pituitary gland was 5.1 mm [2.2;8.1]/4.6 mm [1.9;7.1] for female and male respectively. Values generally varied with BMI with regression slopes spanning 0.0001 to 0.05 and were therefor presented as normative values stratified by BMI. Protrusion of ocular papilla, empty sella and transverse sinus occlusion were rare in total. Our data show an association between BMI and commonly used MRI features for diagnosing IIH. We provide categorized normative BMI values for ONSD, pituitary gland height, and transverse sinus diameter. This distinction helps objectively identify potential IIH indicators compared to regular population norms, enhancing diagnostic accuracy for suspected IIH patients. Notably, optic nerve head protrusion, empty sella, and transverse sinus occlusion are rare in healthy individuals, solidifying their importance as imaging markers regardless of BMI., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib and filgotinib, are increasingly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There has been debate about their safety, particularly following the issuance of guidance by regulatory agencies advising caution in their use in certain patients. The registrational clinical trials and registry data of JAK inhibitors did not identify a difference in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), venous thromboembolism, malignancies or infections (other than herpes zoster) with a JAK inhibitor versus a biologic DMARD. In the ORAL Surveillance trial, which enrolled patients >50 years of age with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, tofacitinib was statistically inferior to TNF inhibitors for the occurrence of MACEs and malignancy. Further post hoc analysis of the data revealed that an age of ≥65 years, a high baseline cardiovascular risk, a history of smoking, sustained inflammation, disease activity and suboptimal treatment of cardiovascular comorbidities all increase the risk of these outcomes. The guidance issued by regulatory agencies should be carefully considered to ensure appropriate and safe treatment of patients with RA without undertreatment of patients who might benefit from JAK inhibitor, as well as biologic, treatment. As always, the risks associated with the use of these agents, treatment goals, costs and patient preferences should be discussed with the patient., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Neurodegenerative diseases (ND) are characterized by progressive loss of neuronal function. Mechanisms of ND pathogenesis are incompletely understood, hampering the development of effective therapies. Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is an inflammatory neoplastic disorder caused by hematopoietic progenitors expressing mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-activating mutations that differentiate into senescent myeloid cells that drive lesion formation. Some individuals with LCH subsequently develop progressive and incurable neurodegeneration (LCH-ND). Here, we showed that LCH-ND was caused by myeloid cells that were clonal with peripheral LCH cells. Circulating BRAFV600E + myeloid cells caused the breakdown of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), enhancing migration into the brain parenchyma where they differentiated into senescent, inflammatory CD11a + macrophages that accumulated in the brainstem and cerebellum. Blocking MAPK activity and senescence programs reduced peripheral inflammation, brain parenchymal infiltration, neuroinflammation, neuronal damage and improved neurological outcome in preclinical LCH-ND. MAPK activation and senescence programs in circulating myeloid cells represent targetable mechanisms of LCH-ND., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab with/without conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs in RA., Methods: The analyses evaluated two open-label extensions (OLEs): EXTEND and MONARCH OLE, which included patients from six randomized trials. Patients received sarilumab 200 mg once every 2 weeks (q2w) for at least 264 weeks up to 516 weeks (EXTEND: Sarilumab Monotherapy and Sarilumab + csDMARD groups) or for 276 weeks (MONARCH OLE: Continuation and Switch groups). Primary endpoints included safety, immunogenicity and changes in laboratory parameters. Secondary endpoints included clinical signs and symptoms along with health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires., Results: The Sarilumab Monotherapy (n = 111), Continuation (n = 165) and Switch (n = 155) groups received sarilumab monotherapy, while the Sarilumab + csDMARD group (n = 1910) received sarilumab in combination with csDMARDs. Incidence of one or more treatment-emergent adverse events was 126 (Sarilumab Monotherapy group), 169 (Sarilumab + csDMARD group), 159 (Continuation group) and 159 (Switch group) events/100 patient-years. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event. Neutropenia was not associated with an increased incidence of infections. Most neutropenia cases normalized on-treatment. Adverse events of special interests, such as malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism and gastrointestinal perforations, were rare. Immunogenicity was low and not associated with hypersensitivity reactions or discontinuations due to lack or loss of efficacy. Improvements in clinical signs and symptoms and HRQOL, observed during the initial blinded trials, were maintained throughout the OLE assessment period., Conclusions: Long-term sarilumab treatment with/without csDMARDs in patients with RA revealed no new safety findings. Efficacy and HRQOL were maintained or further increased over the open-label assessment period., Trial Registration: EXTEND, ClinicalTrials.gov, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01146652, NCT01146652; MONARCH OLE, ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02332590, NCT02332590., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Background: Migraine is a disorder associated with neuropeptide release, pain and inflammation. Tau protein has recently been linked to inflammatory diseases and can be influenced by neuropeptides such as CGRP, a key neurotransmitter in migraine. Here, we report serum concentrations of total-tau protein in migraine patients and healthy controls., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, interictal blood samples from n = 92 patients with episodic migraine (EM), n = 93 patients with chronic migraine (CM), and n = 42 healthy matched controls (HC) were studied. We assessed serum total-tau protein (t-tau) and for comparison neurofilament light chain protein (NfL), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L (UCH-L1) concentrations using the Neurology 4-plex kit, on a single molecule array HD-X Analyzer (Quanterix Corp Lexington, MA). Matched serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were used for post-hoc evaluations of a central nervous system (CNS) source of relevant findings. We applied non-parametric tests to compare groups and assess correlations., Results: Serum t-tau concentrations were elevated in EM [0.320 (0.204 to 0.466) pg/mL] and CM [0.304 (0.158 to 0.406) pg/mL] patients compared to HC [0.200 (0.114 to 0.288) pg/mL] (p = 0.002 vs. EM; p = 0.025 vs. CM). EM with aura [0.291 (0.184 to 0.486 pg/mL); p = 0.013] and EM without aura [0.332 (0.234 to 0.449) pg/mL; p = 0.008] patients had higher t-tau levels than HC but did not differ between each other. Subgroup analysis of CM with/without preventive treatment revealed elevated t-tau levels compared to HC only in the non-prevention group [0.322 (0.181 to 0.463) pg/mL; p = 0.009]. T-tau was elevated in serum (p = 0.028) but not in cerebrospinal fluid (p = 0.760). In contrast to t-tau, all proteins associated with cell damage (NfL, GFAP, and UCH-L1), did not differ between groups., Discussion: Migraine is associated with t-tau elevation in serum but not in the CSF. Our clinical study identifies t-tau as a new target for migraine research., (© 2023. Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Increased risk of serious adverse events (AEs) was reported for tofacitinib relative to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) aged ≥50 years enriched for cardiovascular (CV) risk (ORAL Surveillance). We assessed post hoc the potential risk of upadacitinib in a similar RA population., Methods: Pooled safety data from six phase III trials were evaluated post hoc for AEs in patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg once a day (with or without conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs), adalimumab 40 mg every other week with concomitant methotrexate (MTX), or MTX monotherapy in the overall trial population and in a subset of patients with higher CV risk (aged ≥50 years, ≥1 CV risk factor). Higher-risk patients from a head-to-head study of upadacitinib 15 mg versus adalimumab (SELECT-COMPARE) were assessed in parallel. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for treatment-emergent AEs were summarised based on exposure to upadacitinib or comparators., Results: A total of 3209 patients received upadacitinib 15 mg, 579 received adalimumab and 314 received MTX monotherapy; ~54% of the patients were included in the overall and SELECT-COMPARE higher-risk populations. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) were more frequent in the higher-risk cohorts versus the overall population but were generally similar across treatment groups. Rates of serious infections in higher-risk populations and herpes zoster (HZ) and NMSC in all populations were higher with upadacitinib 15 mg than comparators., Conclusions: An increased risk of MACE, malignancy (excluding NMSC) and VTE was observed in higher-risk populations with RA, yet risk was comparable between upadacitinib-treated and adalimumab-treated patients. Higher rates of NMSC and HZ were observed with upadacitinib versus comparators across all populations, and increased rates of serious infections were detected in upadacitinib-treated patients at higher CV risk., Trial Registration Numbers: NCT02706873, NCT02675426, NCT02629159, NCT02706951, NCT02706847 and NCT03086343., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RF: research grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer-Ingleheim, Flexion, Galapagos, Galvani, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis and UCB. JRC: consulting fees and research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, CorEvitas, Lilly, Novartis, Myriad, Sanofi, Pfizer and UCB. CC-S: research grants from AbbVie, BMS, CSL Behring and Pfizer; consultancy for AbbVie, Priovant Therapeutics, Octapharma, BMS, Pfizer, Gilead and Regeneron-Sanofi. EFM: research grants and consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, BMS, Sandoz, GSK, Janssen and Sanofi. KY: consultancy fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Gilead G.K., Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Eli Lilly Japan and Japan Tobacco; member of the speaker’s bureau at Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly Japan, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Pfizer and Takeda; and research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline and Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma. CR: consultancy and speaking fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Lilly, Hospira, Biogen, Sandoz, Mylan, Novartis and Pfizer. GRB: speaking or consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB. JL, HP, DD and SS: AbbVie employees and may own stocks or options., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The study aimed to test the reliability of a semi-structured telephone interview for the classification of headache disorders according to the ICHD-3., Background: Questionnaire-based screening tools are often optimized for single primary headache diagnoses [e.g., migraine (MIG) and tension headache (TTH)] and therefore insufficiently represent the diagnostic precision of the ICHD-3, which limits epidemiological research of rare headache disorders. Brief semi-structured telephone interviews could be an effective alternative to improve classification., Methods: A patient population representative of different primary and secondary headache disorders ( n = 60) was recruited from the outpatient clinic (HSA) of a tertiary care headache center. These patients completed an established population-based questionnaire for the classification of MIG, TTH, or trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia (TAC). In addition, they received a semi-structured telephone interview call from three blinded headache specialists individually. The agreement of diagnoses made either using the questionnaires or interviews with the HSA diagnoses was evaluated., Results: Of the 59 patients ( n = 1 dropout), 24% had a second-order and 5% had a third-order headache disorder. The main diagnoses were as follows: frequent primary headaches with 61% MIG, 10% TAC, 9% TTH, and 5% rare primary and 16% secondary headaches. Second-order diagnosis was chronic migraine throughout, and third-order diagnoses were medication overuse headache and TTH. Agreement between main headaches from the HSA was significantly better for the telephone interview than for the questionnaire (questionnaire: κ = 0.330; interview: κ = 0.822; p < 0.001). Second-order diagnoses were not adequately captured by questionnaires, while there was a trend for good agreement with the telephone interview (κ = 0.433; p = 0.074). Headache frequency and psychiatric comorbidities were independent predictors of HSA and telephone interview agreement. Male sex, headache frequency, severity, and depressive disorders were independently predictive for agreement between the questionnaire and HSA. The telephone interview showed high sensitivity (≥71%) and specificity (≥92%) for all primary headache disorders, whereas the questionnaire was below 50% in either sensitivity or specificity., Conclusion: The semi-structured telephone interview appears to be a more reliable tool for accurate diagnosis of headache disorders than self-report questionnaires. This offers the potential to improve epidemiological headache research and care even in underserved areas., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Angermaier, Koennecke, Kloetzer, Strauss and Fleischmann.)

Study Design: Prospective quasi-experimental observational study., Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether duration of surgery is a modifiable risk factor for postoperative delirium (POD) after spine surgery and explore further modifiable risk factors. In addition, we sought to investigate the association between POD and postoperative cognitive dysfunction and persistent neurocognitive disorders., Summary of Background Data: Advances in spine surgery enable technically safe interventions in elderly patients with disabling spine disease. The occurrence of POD and delayed neurocognitive complications ( e.g. postoperative cognitive dysfunction/persistent neurocognitive disorder) remain a concern since these contribute to inferior functional outcomes and long-term care dependency after spine surgery., Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center study recruited patients aged 60 years or above and scheduled for elective spine surgery between February 2018 and March 2020. Functional (Barthel Index, BI) and cognitive outcomes [Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) test battery; telephone Montréal Cognitive Assessment] were assessed at baseline, three (V3), and 12 months postoperatively. The primary hypothesis was that the duration of surgery predicts POD. Multivariable predictive models of POD included surgical and anesthesiological parameters., Results: Twenty-two percent of patients developed POD (n=22/99). In a multivariable model, duration of surgery [OR adj =1.61/h (95% CI, 1.20-2.30)], age [OR adj =1.22/yr (95% CI, 1.10-1.36)], and baseline deviations of intraoperative systolic blood pressure [25th percentile: OR adj =0.94/mm Hg (95% CI, 0.89-0.99); 90th percentile: OR adj =1.07/mm Hg (95% CI, 1.01-1.14)] were significantly associated with POD. Postoperative cognitive scores generally improved (V3, ΔCERAD total z -score: 0.22±0.63). However, this positive group effect was counteracted by POD [beta: -0.87 (95% CI, -1.31 to 0.42)], older age [beta: -0.03/yr (95% CI, -0.05 to 0.01)], and lack of functional improvement [ΔBI; beta: -0.04/point (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.02)]. Cognitive scores at twelve months remained inferior in the POD group, adjusted for baseline cognition/age., Conclusions: This study identified distinct neurocognitive effects after spine surgery, which are influenced by perioperative risk factors. Potential cognitive benefits are counteracted by POD, rendering its prevention critical in an aging population., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Overall survival after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using alemtuzumab, fludarabine, and melphalan is associated with high rates of mixed chimerism (MC) and secondary graft failure (GF). We hypothesized that peritransplantation alemtuzumab levels or specific patterns of inflammation would predict these risks. We assessed samples from the Bone Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1204 (NCT01998633) to study the impact of alemtuzumab levels and cytokine patterns on MC and impending or established secondary GF (defined as donor chimerism <5% after initial engraftment and/or requirement of cellular intervention). Thirty-three patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (n = 25) and other IEIs (n = 8) who underwent HCTs with T-cell-replete grafts were included. Patients with day 0 alemtuzumab levels ≤0.32 μg/mL had a markedly lower incidence of MC, 14.3%, vs 90.9% in patients with levels >0.32 μg/mL (P = .008). Impending or established secondary GF was only observed in patients with day 0 alemtuzumab levels >0.32 μg/mL (P = .08). Unexpectedly, patients with impending or established secondary GF had lower CXCL9 levels. The cumulative incidence of impending or established secondary GF in patients with a day 14+ CXCL9 level ≤2394 pg/mL (day 14+ median) was 73.6% vs 0% in patients with a level >2394 pg/mL (P = .002). CXCL9 levels inversely correlated with alemtuzumab levels. These data suggest a model in which higher levels of alemtuzumab at day 0 deplete donor T cells, inhibit the graft-versus-marrow reaction (thereby suppressing CXCL9 levels), and adversely affect sustained engraftment in the nonmyeloablative HCT setting. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01998633., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Advances in spine surgery enable technically safe interventions in older patients with disabling spine disease, yet postoperative delirium (POD) poses a serious risk for postoperative recovery. This study investigates biomarkers of pro-neuroinflammatory states that may help objectively define the pre-operative risk for POD. This study enrolled patients aged ≥60 scheduled for elective spine surgery under general anesthesia. Biomarkers for a pro-neuroinflammatory state included S100 calcium-binding protein β (S100β), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), Gasdermin D, and the soluble ectodomain of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (sTREM2). Postoperative changes of Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were assessed as markers of systemic inflammation preoperatively, intraoperatively, and early postoperatively (up to 48 h). Patients with POD ( n = 19, 75.7 ± 5.8 years) had higher pre-operative levels of sTREM2 (128.2 ± 69.4 pg/mL vs. 97.2 ± 52.0 pg/mL, p = 0.049) and Gasdermin D (2.9 ± 1.6 pg/mL vs. 2.1 ± 1.4 pg/mL, p = 0.29) than those without POD ( n = 25, 75.6 ± 5.1 years). STREM2 was additionally a predictor for POD (OR = 1.01/(pg/mL) [1.00-1.03], p = 0.05), moderated by IL-6 (Wald-χ 2 = 4.06, p = 0.04). Patients with POD additionally showed a significant increase in IL-6, IL-1β, and S100β levels on the first postoperative day. This study identified higher levels of sTREM2 and Gasdermin D as potential markers of a pro-neuroinflammatory state that predisposes to the development of POD. Future studies should confirm these results in a larger cohort and determine their potential as an objective biomarker to inform delirium prevention strategies.

Introduction: One target of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to achieve early sustained remission; over the long term, patients in sustained remission have less structural joint damage and physical disability. We evaluated Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission with abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate and impact of de-escalation (DE) in anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive patients with early RA., Methods: The phase IIIb, randomized, AVERT-2 two-stage study (NCT02504268) evaluated weekly abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate., Primary Endpoint: SDAI remission (≤ 3.3) at week 24. Pre-planned exploratory endpoint: maintenance of remission in patients with sustained remission (weeks 40 and 52) who, from week 56 for 48 weeks (DE period), (1) continued combination abatacept + methotrexate, (2) tapered abatacept to every other week (EOW) + methotrexate for 24 weeks with subsequent abatacept withdrawal (abatacept placebo + methotrexate), or (3) withdrew methotrexate (abatacept monotherapy)., Results: Primary study endpoint was not met: 21.3% (48/225) of patients in the combination and 16.0% (24/150) in the abatacept placebo + methotrexate arm achieved SDAI remission at week 24 (p = 0.2359). There were numerical differences favoring combination therapy in clinical assessments, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and week 52 radiographic non-progression. After week 56, 147 patients in sustained remission with abatacept + methotrexate were randomized (combination, n = 50; DE/withdrawal, n = 50; abatacept monotherapy, n = 47) and entered DE. At DE week 48, SDAI remission (74%) and PRO improvements were mostly maintained with continued combination therapy; lower remission rates were observed with abatacept placebo + methotrexate (48.0%) and with abatacept monotherapy (57.4%). Before withdrawal, de-escalating to abatacept EOW + methotrexate preserved remission., Conclusions: The stringent primary endpoint was not met. However, in patients achieving sustained SDAI remission, numerically more maintained remission with continued abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept monotherapy or withdrawal., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02504268. Video abstract (MP4 62241 KB)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The efficacy of sarilumab and upadacitinib, in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), was demonstrated in phase 3 clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractive to previous biologic DMARDs. In the absence of head-to-head clinical trials, the matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) and simulated treatment comparison (STC) estimate the relative efficacy of sarilumab and upadacitinib in patients with RA who had an inadequate response to previous biologic DMARDs., Methods: Patient-level data for sarilumab were obtained from the TARGET trial (NCT01709578) and published aggregate data for upadacitinib were obtained from the SELECT-BEYOND trial (NCT02706847). For the MAIC, individual patient data from the TARGET trial were assigned weights such that weighted mean baseline characteristics of the treatment effect modifiers matched those from SELECT-BEYOND. For the STC, the TARGET patient-level data and mean baseline values from SELECT-BEYOND were used to simulate sarilumab treatment effects for a SELECT-BEYOND population. Endpoints evaluated included the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria ACR20/50/70, Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) < 3.2, DAS28-CRP < 2.6, Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) < 3.3, and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) < 2.8 at 12 weeks., Results: The analysis included 365 patients from TARGET and aggregated data of 333 patients from SELECT-BEYOND. Matching for potential treatment effect baseline modifiers (i.e., age, oral glucocorticoid use, tender joint count of 68 counts, swollen joint count of 66 counts, serum CRP level, and patient global assessment of disease activity) resulted in a reduction of the effective sample size of TARGET population to 166. Following MAIC and STC analysis, the odds of achieving all aforementioned clinical outcomes versus placebo at week 12 were similar for sarilumab and upadacitinib., Conclusion: In the MAIC and STC analyses from TARGET and SELECT-BEYOND trials, the efficacy of sarilumab and upadacitinib were comparable., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Evaluate the importance of treatment sequencing in SELECT-COMPARE, assessing potential differences between starting upadacitinib or adalimumab therapy following inadequate MTX response., Methods: Patients from SELECT-COMPARE were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg. Per protocol, patients with <20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts (weeks 14, 18, 22) or failure to achieve Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at week 26 were blindly switched from upadacitinib to adalimumab or vice versa. Treatment outcomes, including clinical remission/LDA, physical function, pain and a novel combined endpoint for deep response, were evaluated through 48 weeks and corresponding time-averaged response rates determined. Data were analysed by initial randomized group regardless of any subsequent switch in therapy., Results: This post hoc analysis included 651 patients initially randomized to upadacitinib (of whom 252 switched to adalimumab) and 327 patients initially randomized to adalimumab (of whom 159 switched to upadacitinib). At week 48, patients randomized to either therapy demonstrated similar achievement of most treatment endpoints. Greater improvements in the total time spent in a lower disease state were observed for initial upadacitinib vs initial adalimumab therapy across most clinical and patient-reported outcomes through 48 weeks, and the median time to DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 occurred 6-8 weeks earlier among those randomized to upadacitinib., Conclusion: Following a modified treat-to-target strategy, rates of CDAI remission/LDA and DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 at 48 weeks were similar, regardless of starting therapy. However, patients initially receiving upadacitinib reached treatment targets more quickly and spent more time in clinical targets over the initial 48 weeks of treatment., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02629159., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Background: AVERT-2 (a phase IIIb, two-stage study) evaluated abatacept + methotrexate versus methotrexate alone, in methotrexate-naive, anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive patients with early (≤ 6 months), active RA. This subanalysis investigated whether individual patients who achieved the week 24 Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission primary endpoint could sustain remission to 1 year and then maintain it following changes in therapy., Methods: During the 56-week induction period (IP), patients were randomized to weekly subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg + methotrexate or abatacept placebo + methotrexate. Patients completing the IP who achieved SDAI remission (≤ 3.3) at weeks 40 and 52 entered a 48-week de-escalation (DE) period. Patients treated with abatacept + methotrexate were re-randomized to continue weekly abatacept + methotrexate, or de-escalate and then withdraw abatacept (after 24 weeks), or receive abatacept monotherapy. Proportions of patients achieving sustained SDAI and Boolean remission, and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28 [CRP]) < 2.6, were assessed. For patients achieving early sustained SDAI remission at weeks 24/40/52, flow between disease activity categories and individual trajectories was evaluated; flow was also evaluated for later remitters (weeks 40/52 but not week 24)., Results: Among patients treated with abatacept + methotrexate (n/N = 451/752) at IP week 24, 22% achieved SDAI remission, 17% achieved Boolean remission, and 42% achieved DAS28 (CRP) < 2.6; of these, 56%, 58%, and 74%, respectively, sustained a response throughout IP weeks 40/52. Among patients with a sustained response at IP weeks 24/40/52, 82% (14/17) on weekly abatacept + methotrexate, 81% (13/16) on abatacept monotherapy, 63% (12/19) who de-escalated/withdrew abatacept, and 65% (11/17) on abatacept placebo + methotrexate were in SDAI remission at end of the DE period; rates were higher than for later remitters in all arms except abatacept placebo + methotrexate., Conclusions: A high proportion of individual patients achieving clinical endpoints at IP week 24 with abatacept + methotrexate sustained their responses through week 52. Of patients achieving early and sustained SDAI remission through 52 weeks, numerically more maintained remission during the DE period if weekly abatacept treatment continued., Trial Registration: NCT02504268 (ClinicalTrials.gov), registered July 21, 2015., (© 2023. Crown.)

Introduction: The objective of this analysis was to assess disease activity metrics using a variety of disease outcome measures following methotrexate (MTX) withdrawal in ORAL Shift, a phase 3b/4 study of tofacitinib with/without MTX, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)-defined low disease activity (LDA)., Methods: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with active RA and an inadequate response to MTX received open-label tofacitinib modified-release 11 mg once daily plus MTX for 24 weeks. In the double-blind MTX withdrawal phase, those who had achieved CDAI LDA (≤ 10) at week 24 were randomised 1:1 to receive tofacitinib monotherapy or continued tofacitinib plus MTX. Efficacy analyses were performed in subgroups defined by whether remission and/or LDA had been achieved at week 24 with: Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-4(ESR)], Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), CDAI and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI); or DAS28-4[C-reactive protein(CRP)] < 2.4/ < 2.6/ < 2.9/ ≤ 3.2., Results: Five hundred and thirty patients received treatment in the double-blind MTX withdrawal phase. Proportions of patients achieving each disease activity criterion at week 24 varied by metric. Across disease activity metrics [excluding DAS28-4(ESR) remission], 58-89% of patients per group, and numerically more patients receiving tofacitinib plus MTX, achieved the same criterion at week 48 as at week 24. Differences between groups in least squares mean change from baseline (Δ) DAS28-4(ESR) from week 24-48 favoured tofacitinib plus MTX (nominal p values < 0.05). RAPID3 and DAS28-4(CRP) estimated a higher proportion of patients with acceptable disease state versus DAS28-4(ESR), CDAI remission and SDAI remission., Conclusion: Response rates at the beginning of the double-blind phase varied across metrics. A consistent trend towards higher response rates with tofacitinib plus MTX was observed across metrics after randomisation, with nominal differences in DAS28-4(ESR) responses. Compared with continued combination therapy, MTX withdrawal did not lead to a clinically meaningful reduction in the response to tofacitinib. DAS28-4(CRP) and RAPID3 were the least stringent metrics., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02831855., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Post-stroke delirium (PSD) is a modifiable predictor for worse outcome in stroke. Knowledge of its risk factors would facilitate clinical management of affected patients, but recently updated national guidelines consider available evidence insufficient., Aims: The study aimed to establish risk factors for PSD incidence and duration using high-frequency screening., Methods: We prospectively investigated patients with ischemic stroke admitted within 24 h. Patients were screened twice daily for the presence of PSD throughout the treatment period. Sociodemographic, treatment-related, and neuroimaging characteristics were evaluated as predictors of either PSD incidence (odds ratios (OR)) or duration (PSD days/unit of the predictor, b ), using logistic and linear regression models, respectively., Results: PSD occurred in 55/141 patients (age = 73.8 ± 10.4 years, 61 female, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) = 6.4 ± 6.5). Age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.10), b  = 0.08 (95% CI = 0.04-0.13)), and male gender ( b  = 0.99 (95% CI = 0.05-1.93)) were significant non-modifiable risk factors. In a multivariable model adjusted for age and gender, presence of pain (OR < sub >  mvar  = 1.75 (95% CI = 1.12-2.74)), urinary catheter (OR < sub >  mvar   = 3.16 (95% CI = 1.10-9.14)) and post-stroke infection (PSI; OR < sub >  mvar   = 4.43 (95% CI = 1.09-18.01)) were predictors of PSD incidence. PSD duration was impacted by presence of pain ( b  < sub >  mvar  = 0.49 (95% CI = 0.19-0.81)), urinary catheter ( b  < sub >  mvar   = 1.03 (95% CI = 0.01-2.07)), intravenous line ( b  < sub >  mvar  = 0.36 (95% CI = 0.16-0.57)), and PSI ( b  < sub >  mvar  = 1.60 (95% CI = 0.42-2.78)). PSD (OR = 3.53 (95% CI = 1.48-5.57)) and PSI (OR = 5.29 (95% CI = 2.92-7.66)) independently predicted inferior NIHSS at discharge. Insular and basal ganglia lesions increased the PSD risk about four- to eight-fold., Discussion/conclusion: This study identified modifiable risk factors, the management of which might reduce the negative impact PSD has on outcome.

(1) Background: COVID-19 is often associated with significant long-term symptoms and disability, i.e., the long/post-COVID syndrome (PCS). Even after presumably mild COVID-19 infections, an increasing number of patients seek medical help for these long-term sequelae, which can affect various organ systems. The pathogenesis of PCS is not yet understood. Therapy has so far been limited to symptomatic treatment. The Greifswald Post COVID Rehabilitation Study (PoCoRe) aims to follow and deeply phenotype outpatients with PCS in the long term, taking a holistic and comprehensive approach to the analysis of their symptoms, signs and biomarkers. (2) Methods: Post-COVID outpatients are screened for symptoms in different organ systems with a standardized medical history, clinical examination, various questionnaires as well as physical and cardiopulmonary function tests. In addition, biomaterials are collected for the analysis of immunomodulators, cytokines, chemokines, proteome patterns as well as specific (auto)antibodies. Patients are treated according to their individual needs, adhering to the current standard of care. PoCoRe's overall aim is to optimize diagnostics and therapy in PCS patients.

Neuroinflammatory mechanisms and maladaptive neuroplasticity underlie the progression of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), which is prototypical of central neuropathic pain conditions. While cortical maladaptive alterations are well described, little is known about the contribution of the brainstem to the pathophysiology. This study investigates the role of pain-modulatory brainstem pathways in CRPS using the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR), which not only provides a direct read-out of brainstem excitability and habituation to painful stimuli but may also be suitable for use as a diagnostic biomarker for CRPS. Thirteen patients with CRPS and thirteen healthy controls (HCs) participated in this prospective case-control study investigating the polysynaptic trigemino-cervical (R2) nBR response. The R2 area and its habituation were assessed following repeated supraorbital electrical stimulation. Between-group comparisons included evaluations of diagnostic characteristics as a potential biomarker for the disease. Patients with CRPS showed a substantial decrease in habituation on the stimulated (Cohen's d: 1.3; p = 0.012) and the non-stimulated side (Cohen's d: 1.1; p = 0.04). This is the first study to reveal altered nBR habituation as a pathophysiological mechanism and potential diagnostic biomarker in CRPS. We confirmed previous findings of altered nBR excitability, but the diagnostic accuracy was inferior. Future studies should investigate the nBR as a marker of progression to central mechanisms in CRPS and as a biomarker to predict treatment response or prognosis.

Objective: To investigate correlations between biomarkers of bone remodelling and extracellular matrix turnover with baseline disease activity and treatment response in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: A ssessing V ery E arly R heumatoid arthritis T reatment-2 (AVERT-2; NCT02504268) included disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-naive, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive patients randomised to weekly subcutaneous abatacept+methotrexate (MTX) or abatacept placebo+MTX for 56 weeks. This post hoc exploratory subanalysis assessed the association between baseline disease activity and eight biomarkers (Spearman's correlation coefficient), and whether baseline biomarkers (continuous or categorical variables) could predict treatment response at weeks 24 and 52 (logistic regression)., Results: Patient characteristics were similar between overall (n=752) and biomarker subgroup (n=535) populations and across treatments. At baseline, neoepitopes of matrix metalloproteinase-mediated degradation products of types III and IV collagen and of C reactive protein (CRP) showed the greatest correlations with disease activity; cross-linked carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) showed weak correlation. Only CTX-I predicted treatment response; baseline CTX-I levels were significantly associated with achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index remission and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28 (CRP)) <2.6 (weeks 24 and 52), and American College of Rheumatology 70 response (week 52), in patients treated with abatacept+MTX but not abatacept placebo+MTX. CTX-I predicted significant differential response between arms for DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 (week 24). Treatment differences were greater for abatacept+MTX in patients with medium/high versus low baseline CTX-I., Conclusion: In MTX-naive, ACPA-positive patients with early RA, baseline CTX-I predicted treatment response to abatacept+MTX but not abatacept placebo+MTX., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CW, YH, SEC and JL are employees of and shareholders in Bristol Myers Squibb. PS is an employee of Bristol Myers Squibb and shareholder in Bristol Myers Squibb and Celgene Corporation; has received support for meetings/travel from Bristol Myers Squibb; and has patent applications with Bristol Myers Squibb. RW was an employee of Bristol Myers Squibb at the time of analysis and has stock options in Bristol Myers Squibb. SHN has received grant/research support from Innovation Fund Denmark and owns stock in Nordic Bioscience. A-CB-J is an employee of and has stock or stock options in Nordic Bioscience. PE has received grant/research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Novartis and Samsung; has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly and Novartis; has received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Novartis and Samsung; and received support for meetings/travel from Novartis. YT has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Corrona, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai and Takeda; and has received honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Pfizer. VPB has received grant/research support from NIH/fNIH (Accelerated Medicines Program; funds to institution; grants 1UH2AR067691-01 and GRANT11652401) and Cedar Hill; has received consulting fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genzyme, Gilead, Janssen, Sanofi and UCB; has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for KAI; and acted as Project Advisor for Pfizer. Additionally, VPB’s spouse is an employee of and has ownership interest in Brainstorm Therapeutics. COB has received grant/research support from Bristol Myers Squibb; has received royalties from Up to Date; has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi; has participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Moderna; and is on the Executive Committee for OMERACT (unpaid). TWJH/the Department of Rheumatology LUMC has received research support/lecture fees/consultancy fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen and Pfizer. RF has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cambrian, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Teijin and Vyne; has received honoraria from AbbVie and Pfizer; and has participated on Data Safety Monitoring Boards for AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Vascular risk factors may predispose to post-stroke delirium (PSD). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The primary outcome was the prevalence of vascular risk factors in PSD vs. non-PSD patients. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs were calculated for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Fixed effects or random effects models were used in case of low- or high-statistical heterogeneity, respectively. We found an increased prevalence of atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.74, p = 0.0004), prior stroke (OR = 1.48, p < 0.00001), coronary artery disease (OR = 1.48, p < 0.00001), heart failure (OR = 2.01, p < 0.0001), and peripheral vascular disease (OR = 2.03, p < 0.00001) in patients with vs. without PSD. PSD patients were older (MD = 5.27 y, p < 0.00001) compared with their non-PSD counterparts. Advanced age, atrial fibrillation, prior stroke, coronary artery disease, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease appeared to be significantly associated with PSD.

Introduction: Pain is a multidimensional factor and core domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This analysis aimed to quantify the role of potential inflammation-associated outcomes on pain reduction in patients with PsA receiving tofacitinib, using mediation modeling., Methods: Pooled data were from two phase 3 studies (OPAL Broaden and OPAL Beyond) of patients with active PsA treated with tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or placebo. Mediation modeling was utilized to quantify the indirect effects (via Itch Severity Item [ISI], C-reactive protein [CRP] levels, swollen joint count [SJC], Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI], and enthesitis [using Leeds Enthesitis Index]) and direct effects (representing all other factors) of tofacitinib treatment on pain improvement., Results: The initial model showed that tofacitinib treatment affects pain, primarily indirectly, via ISI, CRP, SJC, PASI, and enthesitis (overall 84.0%; P = 0.0009), with 16.0% (P = 0.5274) attributable to the direct effect. The model was respecified to exclude SJC and PASI. Analysis of the final model revealed that 29.5% (P = 0.0579) of tofacitinib treatment effect on pain was attributable to the direct effect, and 70.5% (P < 0.0001) was attributable to the indirect effect. ISI, CRP, and enthesitis mediated 37.4% (P = 0.0002), 15.3% (P = 0.0107), and 17.8% (P = 0.0157) of the tofacitinib treatment effect on pain, respectively., Conclusions: The majority of the effect of tofacitinib on pain was collectively mediated by itch, CRP, and enthesitis, with itch being the primary mediator of treatment effect., Trial Registration: NCT01877668, NCT01882439. GRAPHICAL PLS., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Understanding how SARS-CoV-2 affects respiratory centres in the brainstem may help to preclude assisted ventilation for patients in intensive care setting. Viral invasion appears unlikely, although autoimmunity has been implicated, the responsible antigens remain unknown. We previously predicted the involvement of three epitopes within distinct brainstem proteins: disabled homolog 1 (DAB1), apoptosis-inducing-factor-1 (AIFM1), and surfeit-locus-protein-1 (SURF1)., Methods: Here, we used microarrays to screen serum from COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care and compared those with controls who experienced mild course of the disease., Findings: The results confirm the occurrence of IgG and IgM antibodies against the hypothesised epitopes in COVID-19 patients. Importantly, while IgM levels were similar in both groups, IgG levels were significantly elevated in severely ill patients compared to controls, suggesting a pathogenic role of IgG., Interpretation: The newly discovered anti-neuronal antibodies might be promising markers of severe disease and the targeted peptide epitopes might be used for targeted immunomodulation. Further work is needed to determine whether these antibodies may play a role in long-COVID., Funding: AF, CF and PR received support from the German Research Foundation (grants FL 379/22-1, 327654276-SFB 1315, FR 4479/1-1, PR 1274/8-1). SH, DR, and DB received support from the Ministry of Economy, State of Mecklenburg Western Pomerania, Germany (grant COVIDPROTECT: "Optimisation of diagnostic and therapeutic pathways for COVID-19 patients in MV"). SH received support from the Research Group Molecular Medicine University of Greifswald (FVMM, seed funding FOVB-2021-01). AV received support from the Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation and the Alzheimer Research Initiative., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The Universitätsmedizin Greifswald has filed a patent application on immunomodulatory peptides for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection, on which GL and AF are named as inventors. FB, AV, DR, SH, BB, AS, RF, HP declare that they have no competing interests. CF declares honoraria for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers-Squibb., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Responsive assessment of disease activity in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is necessary to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and guide treatment. We compared the utility of the multibiomarker disease activity (MBDA) score in the assessment of RA disease activity with that of the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) score and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of repository corticotropin injection (RCI) in patients with persistently active RA., Methods: Patients received 80 units of RCI twice weekly during a 12-week open-label period; those who experienced low disease activity at week 12 were randomly assigned to receive either 80 units of RCI or placebo twice weekly during a 12-week double-blind period. Changes in disease activity (measured by DAS28-ESR, CDAI, and MBDA scores) and correlations between MBDA scores and both DAS28-ESR and CDAI scores were assessed., Results: Changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR and CDAI scores suggested that RCI therapy led to clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity, but improvements from baseline in MBDA scores were below the minimally important difference threshold. For the DAS28-ESR and CDAI, correlations with total MBDA and individual component scores were generally low (r ≤ 0.3) and occasionally moderate (r > 0.3 but r < 0.5)., Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest overall MBDA scores are not sufficiently responsive for assessing RA disease activity after RCI therapy. These findings are consistent with those seen with other RA drugs and, although they are from a clinical trial, suggest the MBDA should not be a preferred disease activity measure in clinical practice., (© 2021 American College of Rheumatology.)

Background: ABBV-599 is a novel fixed-dose combination of the Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor elsubrutinib and the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor upadacitinib under investigation for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. We aimed to determine whether ABBV-599 could increase the treatment response for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis compared with inhibiting either pathway alone, while maintaining an acceptable safety profile., Methods: We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-exploratory, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial at 75 community sites in eight countries in Europe and North America. We enrolled patients who were 18 years or older with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (3:2:2:2:2:1) via interactive response technology to receive daily, orally administered ABBV-599 (ie, upadacitinib 15 mg plus elsubrutinib 60 mg), elsubrutinib 60 mg, elsubrutinib 20 mg, elsubrutinib 5 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by the number of previous biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The investigator, study site personnel, and patients were masked throughout the study. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in disease activity score of 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at week 12 for all patients who received a study drug. Pharmacokinetics and safety were also assessed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03682705., Findings: Between Oct 8, 2018, and March 26, 2020, 242 patients were randomly assigned to receive ABBV-599 (n=62), elsubrutinib 60 mg (n=41), elsubrutinib 20 mg (n=39), elsubrutinib 5 mg (n=41), upadacitinib 15 mg (n=40), or placebo (n=19). Of the 242 patients, 204 (84%) were female, 38 (16%) were male, and 220 (91%) were White; the mean age at baseline was 58·0 years (SD 11·3). Compared with placebo, the least squares mean changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP were -1·44 (90% CI -2·03 to -0·85; p<0·0001) for ABBV-599, -0·40 (-1·03 to 0·23; p=0·29) for elsubrutinib 60 mg, -0·20 (-0·85 to 0·44; p=0·61) for elsubrutinib 20 mg, -0·21 (-0·84 to 0·41; p=0·57) for elsubrutinib 5 mg, and -1·75 (-2·38 to -1·13; p<0·0001) for upadacitinib. No significant improvements in efficacy measures for elsubrutinib alone (any dose) versus placebo were detected, despite adequate plasma exposure and target engagement. Treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 113 (47%) of 242 patients, with similar proportions for all groups., Interpretation: Significant improvements in disease activity metrics of rheumatoid arthritis with ABBV-599 were driven by the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib with no discernible effect by the BTK inhibitor elsubrutinib., Funding: AbbVie., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RF has received funding or grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Samumed, Teva, UCB, Viela, and VORSO; and honorarium for consultancy from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. AF, TD, WL, ZW, and WH are full-time employees of AbbVie and might hold AbbVie stock or stock options. AN was a full-time employee of AbbVie at the time of the investigation. GC-M has received funding or grant support from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Moderna, Pfizer, UCB, and Vertex. SC has received funding, grant support, or honorarium for consultancy from AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Genetech, Lilly, Pfizer, and Roche. PCT has received funding or grant support from Celgene, Galapagos, and Lilly; and honorarium for consultancy from AbbVie, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. RB has received funding or grant support from AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche; and honorarium for consultancy from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Roche. ED and AS declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To explore the safety and efficacy of filgotinib (FIL), a Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, and lanraplenib (LANRA), a spleen kinase inhibitor, in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE)., Methods: This was a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, exploratory, proof-of-concept study of LANRA (30 mg), FIL (200 mg) or placebo (PBO) once daily for 12 weeks in patients with active CLE. At week 12, PBO patients were rerandomized 1:1 to receive LANRA or FIL for up to 36 additional weeks., Results: Of 47 randomized patients, 45 were treated (PBO, n = 9; LANRA, n = 19; FIL, n = 17). The primary endpoint [change from baseline in Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index Activity (CLASI-A) score at week 12] was not met. The least squares mean CLASI-A score change from baseline was -5.5 (s.e. 2.56) with PBO, -4.5 (1.91) with LANRA and -8.7 (1.85) with FIL. Numerical differences between FIL and PBO were greater in select subgroups. A ≥5-point improvement in the CLASI-A score at week 12 was achieved by 50.0%, 56.3% and 68.8% in the PBO, LANRA and FIL arms, respectively. A numerically greater proportion of patients in the FIL arm (50%) also achieved ≥50% improvement in the CLASI-A score at week 12 (37.5% PBO, 31.3% LANRA). Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. Two serious AEs were reported with LANRA and one with FIL., Conclusion: The primary endpoint was not met. Select subgroups displayed a numerically greater treatment response to FIL relative to PBO. LANRA and FIL were generally well tolerated., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03134222., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Introduction: A substantial number of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 experience long-term persistent symptoms. First evidence suggests that long-term symptoms develop largely independently of disease severity and include, among others, cognitive impairment. For these symptoms, there are currently no validated therapeutic approaches available. Cognitive training interventions are a promising approach to counteract cognitive impairment. Combining training with concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may further increase and sustain behavioural training effects. Here, we aim to examine the effects of cognitive training alone or in combination with tDCS on cognitive performance, quality of life and mental health in patients with post-COVID-19 subjective or objective cognitive impairments., Methods and Analysis: This study protocol describes a prospective randomised open endpoint-blinded trial. Patients with post-COVID-19 cognitive impairment will either participate in a 3-week cognitive training or in a defined muscle relaxation training (open-label interventions). Irrespective of their primary intervention, half of the cognitive training group will additionally receive anodal tDCS, all other patients will receive sham tDCS (double-blinded, secondary intervention). The primary outcome will be improvement of working memory performance, operationalised by an n-back task, at the postintervention assessment. Secondary outcomes will include performance on trained and untrained tasks and measures of health-related quality of life at postassessment and follow-up assessments (1 month after the end of the trainings)., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the University Medicine Greifswald (number: BB 066/21). Results will be available through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences., Trial Registration Number: NCT04944147., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: A phase IV clinical trial confirmed the safety and efficacy of repository corticotropin injection (RCI, Acthar ® Gel) in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that was nonresponsive to standard-of-care therapies. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to identify baseline demographics and clinical characteristics that may be predictors of response to RCI., Methods: The phase IV trial was a two-part, randomized, placebo-controlled withdrawal study. Post hoc analysis was conducted with the open-label portion of the trial data, in which all 258 subjects received RCI (80 U) twice weekly for 12 weeks. Responders were subjects who achieved low disease activity (LDA) by a Disease Activity Score with 28-joint count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) of < 3.2 at week 12. Responders were compared with nonresponders by assessing the proportion of subjects in each group for demographics and clinical characteristics, including weight, disease duration, medical history including osteoarthritis and unrelated joint conditions, hemoglobin A1c, C-reactive protein, ESR, DAS28-ESR, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), depression, anxiety, tender joint count (TJC), and swollen joint count (SJC). Bivariate analysis followed by multiple logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify significant baseline predictors for the outcome of achieving LDA by week 12., Results: Bivariate analysis showed that RCI responders had significantly lower baseline TJC (p = 0.0310), SJC (p = 0.0018), ESR (p = 0.0487), and CDAI (p = 0.0112) and shorter RA disease duration (p = 0.0446). Subjects were less likely to achieve LDA if they had osteoarthritis (p < 0.0001), other joint-related conditions unrelated to RA (p < 0.0001), anemia (p = 0.0132), depression (p = 0.0006), or prior or concomitant use of targeted-synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (p < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that, of the above, only ongoing osteoarthritis (p = 0.0272) or other joint-related conditions (p = 0.0193) were significant negative predictors of RCI response., Conclusions: These results identify specific patient characteristics that may be considered predictors of positive or negative clinical response to RCI., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Approximately 6% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the USA have refractory disease that is resistant to standard-of-care therapies. A recent phase IV clinical trial affirmed the safety and efficacy of repository corticotropin injection (RCI; Acthar® Gel) for refractory RA. This post hoc analysis of the clinical trial data assessed whether changes in clinical measures correlated with patient-reported outcome (PRO) improvements., Methods: Data were assessed from the trial's open-label period when patients received RCI (80 U) twice weekly for 12 weeks. Clinical assessments included hemoglobin A1c, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), total joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Disease Activity Score with 28 joint count and ESR (DAS28-ESR), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). PROs included pain (Visual Analog Scale), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-F]), disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI]), and activity impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] questionnaire). Patients grouped by minimal clinically important difference (MCID) improvement vs no improvement in PROs were compared with clinical measures at week 12. Correlations were determined by multivariable linear regression analysis and standardized coefficient estimates., Results: RCI responders, defined as patients with DAS28-ESR < 3.2 at week 12, reported significantly greater PRO improvements for pain, disability, fatigue, activity impairment, current work impairment, and overall work impairment than nonresponders. Patients with MCID improvements in all PROs showed significantly greater decreases in mean values for TJC, DAS28-ESR, and CDAI, whereas those with pain, fatigue, and disability improvements had significantly greater SJC and ESR reductions. Multivariable linear regression analysis determined that improvement from baseline in all PROs correlated with significant decreases in TJC, DAS28-ESR, and CDAI. ESR reduction significantly correlated with improvements in pain and disability, but not fatigue or WPAI., Conclusions: These results confirm that clinical responses to RCI were directly correlated with patient perception of improvement., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The biologics abatacept and adalimumab have different mechanisms of action (MoAs). We analyzed data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in AMPLE (NCT00929864) to explore the pharmacodynamic effects of abatacept or adalimumab on anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and gene expression., Methods: AMPLE was a phase IIIb, 2-year, randomized, head-to-head trial of abatacept versus adalimumab. Post hoc analyses of baseline anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-2 (anti-CCP2, an ACPA surrogate) positive (+) status and ACPA fine-specificity profiles over time, as well as transcriptional profiling (peripheral whole blood), were performed., Results: Of 646 patients treated (abatacept, n = 318; adalimumab, n = 328), ACPA and gene expression data were available from 508 and 566 patients, respectively. In anti-CCP2+ patients (n = 388), baseline fine specificities for most ACPAs were highly correlated; over 2 years, levels decreased with abatacept but not adalimumab. By year 2, expression of genes associated with T cell co-stimulation and antibody production was lower for abatacept versus adalimumab; expression of genes associated with proinflammatory signaling was lower for adalimumab versus abatacept. Treatment modulated the expression of T- and B-cell gene signatures, with differences in CD8+ T cells, activated T cells, plasma cells, B cells, natural killer cells (all lower with abatacept versus adalimumab), and polymorphonuclear leukocytes (higher with abatacept versus adalimumab)., Conclusions: In AMPLE, despite similar clinical outcomes, data showed that pharmacodynamic/genetic changes after 2 years of abatacept or adalimumab were consistent with drug MoAs. Further assessment of the relationship between such changes and clinical outcomes, including prediction of response, is warranted., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00929864., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Five jakinibs are approved for the treatment of rheumatic diseases. There has been a question of their relative safety to other medications since their approval., Areas Covered: A literature search was conducted in Pub Med for the integrated safety databases of these molecules in their clinical trial program, registries, and insurance claims data and in a prospective head-to-head study compared to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in a high-risk population for cardiovascular and malignancy events. There were no differences found in the safety databases, registries or insurance claims data indicating jakinibs are more likely to cause major adverse cardiac events, malignancy, venous thrombotic episodes, infections, and mortality compared to other medications. The head-to-head trial found that there were numerically more of these events with the jakinib compared to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors., Expert Opinion: Cardiac events and malignancy occur more frequently in rheumatoid patients with active disease. Although the safety databases, claims data, and registries suggest that there is no difference in the risks with a jakinib versus biologics, the prospective safety study showed these events occur numerically higher in patients at the highest risk for these events. In this population, one should consider using a biologic before a jakinib.

Objectives: This post hoc analysis assessed speed, magnitude and maintenance of pain improvement in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving baricitinib, baricitinib and methotrexate (MTX), or MTX over 1 year. Cumulative pain and quality of life benefits were also assessed., Methods: Randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study RA-BEGIN (NCT01711359) compared baricitinib 4 mg (N=159), baricitinib 4 mg +MTX (N=215) and MTX (N=210) in patients with RA who had no or limited prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment. Pain was assessed on a 0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Proportion of patients with ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥70% pain improvement from baseline; ≤20 mm and ≤10 mm on the pain VAS; and time to achieve pain improvement thresholds were assessed over 52 weeks, as were Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS) outcomes., Results: Baricitinib monotherapy or combination with MTX provides greater (least square mean changes (LSM) from baseline -40 mm and -43 mm, respectively) and more rapid (median 12 and 8 weeks to ≥70% improvement, respectively) pain relief than MTX alone (LSM -31 mm, median 20 weeks to ≥70% improvement) over 52 weeks. Baricitinib, alone or combination, provides 9-10 additional weeks of limited to no pain, similar gain in achievable wellness measured through PtGA, and 5-7 additional weeks with change in SF-36 PCS ≥5 vs MTX over 1 year., Conclusions: Patients treated with baricitinib reported significantly greater and more rapid pain relief, more weeks with limited to no pain, and clinically meaningful improvements in physical health than patients treated with MTX alone over 1 year., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PCT has received research grants and/or consultation fees from Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly and Company, AbbVie, and Pfizer. Rieke Alten has received honoraria and research grants from Abbvie, BMS, Galalapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis and Pfizer. JMAG has received consulting fees from Eli Lilly and Company and Pfizer; honoraria from Abbvie, Eli Lilly and Company, Galapagos, Gilead, Pfizer, Roche and UCB; and support for attending meetings from Abbvie, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and UCB. YK has received grants or speaking fees from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Bristol–Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Company, Jansen, Kissei, Kirin, Novartis pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, Tanabe-Mitsubishi and UCB. CW, AQ, BJ, NB and JRT are employees and may be shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. RF has received grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, and Pfizer; consulting fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, and Pfizer; and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead and Pfizer., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of baricitinib on inhibiting radiographic progression of structural joint damage over 5 years in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Patients completed 1 of 3 phase III baricitinib trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01711359, NCT01710358, or NCT01721057) and entered the long-term extension RA-BEYOND (NCT01885078), in which patients received once-daily 4 mg or 2 mg baricitinib. Across these trials, patients initially receiving methotrexate (MTX) or adalimumab (ADA) switched to baricitinib 4 mg at Week 52. Patients initially receiving placebo (PBO) switched to baricitinib 4 mg at Week 24. Radiographs were scored at baseline and Years 2, 3, 4, and 5. Change from baseline in van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (ΔmTSS) was computed., Results: Overall, 2125 of 2573 (82.6%) randomized patients entered RA-BEYOND; 1837 of 2125 (86.4%) entered this analysis. From Years 3 to 5, higher proportions of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients on initial baricitinib (monotherapy or with MTX) had no progression vs initial MTX (ΔmTSS ≤ 0 at Year 5: 59.6% baricitinib 4 mg; 66.2% baricitinib 4 mg + MTX; 40.7% MTX). Higher proportions of patients with inadequate response (IR) to MTX on initial baricitinib or ADA vs PBO had no progression (ΔmTSS ≤ 0 at Year 5: 54.8% baricitinib 4 mg; 55.0% ADA; 50.3% PBO). Higher proportions of patients with conventional synthetic DMARD-IR on initial baricitinib 4 mg had less progression vs initial PBO or baricitinib 2 mg (ΔmTSS ≤ 0 at Year 5: 66.7% baricitinib 4 mg; 58.2% baricitinib 2 mg; 60.0% PBO)., Conclusion: Oral baricitinib maintained lower levels of radiographic progression than initial conventional synthetic DMARD or PBO through 5 years in patients with active RA., (© 2022 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)