Search

A prospective observational study was conducted during a two-year period to evaluate the prevalence of hospitalized pneumonia in six hospital units of the Bologna S.Orsola-Malpighi hospital (Italy). The selected units were: general surgery, general medicine, internal medicine, geriatrics, respiratory physiopathology and pneumology, with a total of 205 beds and around 4,800 admissions per year. Data were collected from the clinical cards and cases of pneumonia were distinguished by origin (community-acquired or hospital-acquired according to CDC definition), individual and clinical characteristics, and aetiology. The study involved 486 cases of pneumonia: 75 hospital-acquired and 411 community-acquired (84.6%). Patients affected by hospital-acquired pneumonia were older (average age 77 years) compared to community-acquired cases (74 years) and show a more homogeneous gender distribution (males: 48.0% vs 59.4%). Hospital stays (42 vs 21 days) and mortality rates (24.0% vs 11.7%) were significantly higher in hospital-acquired pneumonia. The incidence rate of nosocomial pneumonia was 7.4 per 1000 hospitalized patients and increased to 17-23 per 1000 in the pneumology and respiratory physiopathology units. Only 16.9% of cases had an aetiological diagnosis (14.1% community-acquired; 31.8% hospital-acquired); the most common isolates were S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. The hospital-acquired cases were caused by Gram-negative bacilli more often than the community-acquired cases, and infections were more frequently polymicrobial (37.5% vs 3.4%). In order to reduce morbidity and mortality due to pneumonia it is important to implement prevention measures in the community (i.e. specific vaccination campaigns), improve clinical protocols for aetiological diagnosis in hospitalised patients and increase epidemiological surveillance of hospital-acquired infections.

A prospective surveillance study of legionnaires disease and an environmental survey of Legionella species were performed simultaneously in a general hospital. During a period of 3 years, 705 patients with pneumonia were screened with a Legionella urinary antigen test, and pneumonia was confirmed by culture and serological tests. Twelve cases of legionnaires disease were identified, none of which were hospital acquired, despite the fact that 60% of hospital water samples were contaminated with Legionella pneumophila at a concentration of more than 10(3) colony-forming units/L. The probable source of infection was identified for only 2 community-acquired cases. The results show that environmental contamination alone is not able to predict the risk of legionnaires disease. If no cases are present, monitoring of hospital water systems is of little significance; clinical surveillance is much more important.

A study was undertaken to determine the resources available in Italian hospitals for the control of nosocomial infections and the factors favouring a successful approach. During January-May 2000 a questionnaire about infection control was sent to the hospital health director of all Italian National Health System hospitals treating acute patients and with more than 3500 admissions in 1999. An active programme was defined as a hospital infection control committee (HICC) meeting at least four times in 1999, the presence of a doctor with infection control responsibilities, a nurse employed in infection control and at least one surveillance activity and one infection control guideline issued or updated in the past two years. There was a response rate of 87.5% (463/529). Almost fifteen percent (69/463) of hospitals had an active programme for Infection Control and 76.2% (353/463) had a HICC. Seventy-one percent (330/463) of the hospitals had a hospital infection control physician and 53% (250/463) had infection control nurses. Fifty-two percent (242/463) reported at least one surveillance activity and 70.8% (328/463) had issued or updated at least one guidance document in the last two years. The presence of regional policies [odds ratio (OR) 8.7], operative groups (OR 4.2), at least one full-time nurse (OR 4.6) and a hospital annual plan which specified infection control (OR 2.1) were statistically associated with an active programme in the multivariate analysis.

As part of an extensive investigation into the use of disinfectants in hospitals, data from 189 hospitals in the north of Italy, including 38 in the Emilia-Romagna region, were examined. Eleven fields of employment were assessed. It was found that benzalkonium chloride was primarily used for disinfection of the operative field, wounds, excoriations, sores, the skin prior to injection, surgical instruments, catheters, thermometers, and utensils. Chlorhexidine was preferred to disinfection of the hands and medical equipment. Formaldehyde was preferred for ambient surfaces, the air of confined spaces, and (in association with chlorine and its derivatives) for sanitary services and vessels. Glutaric aldehyde was preferred for apparatus fitted with lenses or optical fibres. By comparison with other parts of N. Italy. Emilia-Romagna made greater use of hydrogen peroxide for skin lesions, and alcohol for disinfection prior to transcutaneous injections.

In an investigation of the use of disinfectants in hospitals, the replies received from 338 institutions were analysed and subsequently compared with those obtained from southern Italy. It was found that benzalkonium chloride was the substance most widely used in Italy for disinfection of the surgical field, wounds, excoriations, sores, the skin prior to injections, surgical instruments, medical apparatus, catheters, thermometers and sanitary appliances, whereas chlorhexidine was preferred for disinfection of the hands, and for ambient surfaces in combination with cetrimide. Formic aldehyde was preferred for ambient surfaces, the air of confined spaces, and, in conjunction with chlorine and its derivatives, for sanitary services and their vessels. Glutaraldehyde was the substance most commonly employed for the disinfection of medical apparatus fitted with optic fibre lenses. In southern Italy, by contrast with the position in Italy as a whole, there was a greater use of chlorine and its derivatives for the disinfection of ambient surfaces, benzalkonium chloride for the disinfection and cleaning of sanitary services, vessels, and equipment with optic fibres, and alcohols for the disinfection of surgical instruments and sanitary appliances.

A survey was conducted on the use of various disinfectants in Italy. Subsequently the data provided by the various hospitals appealed to (38.7% of which answered the questionnaire) was analysed. The disinfectants were divided into groups and the percentage used in various fields was calculated. A clear difference was revealed between the use of the various disinfectants in the North, Centre and South of Italy. The percentage of mistaken or improper use of the disinfectants was then calculated. Finally the relative consumption of commercial preparations using the disinfectants, the average cost per bed and the total expenditure on disinfectants in Italy were then calculated.

A study was made of 1050 urine specimens from the Nephro-Urological and Geriatric Departments of the Malpighi Hospital to see how many percent contained antibacterial substances and the incidence of bacteria species. 26.5% contained antibacterial substances. Proteus rettgeri was significantly more frequent in specimens containing such substances, whereas staphylococci were significantly more frequent in the remainder.