Search

Following on from the 2015 Lancet Oncology Commission on expanding global access to radiotherapy, Radiotherapy and theranostics: a Lancet Oncology Commission was created to assess the access and availability of radiotherapy to date and to address the important issue of access to the promising field of theranostics at a global level. A marked disparity in the availability of radiotherapy machines between high-income countries and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been identified previously and remains a major problem. The availability of a suitably trained and credentialled workforce has also been highlighted as a major limiting factor to effective implementation of radiotherapy, particularly in LMICs. We investigated initiatives that could mitigate these issues in radiotherapy, such as extended treatment hours, hypofractionation protocols, and new technologies. The broad implementation of hypofractionation techniques compared with conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer and breast cancer was projected to provide radiotherapy for an additional 2·2 million patients (0·8 million patients with prostate cancer and 1·4 million patients with breast cancer) with existing resources, highlighting the importance of implementing new technologies in LMICs. A global survey undertaken for this Commission revealed that use of radiopharmaceutical therapy-other than 131 I-was highly variable in high-income countries and LMICs, with supply chains, workforces, and regulatory issues affecting access and availability. The capacity for radioisotope production was highlighted as a key issue, and training and credentialling of health professionals involved in theranostics is required to ensure equitable access and availability for patient treatment. New initiatives-such as the International Atomic Energy Agency's Rays of Hope programme-and interest by international development banks in investing in radiotherapy should be supported by health-care systems and governments, and extended to accelerate the momentum generated by recognising global disparities in access to radiotherapy. In this Commission, we propose actions and investments that could enhance access to radiotherapy and theranostics worldwide, particularly in LMICs, to realise health and economic benefits and reduce the burden of cancer by accessing these treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HH serves (unpaid) on an external advisory board of the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, on the International Advisory Board of the University of Vienna, on the Scientific Committee of the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), on the Board of Trustees of the DKFZ, and on the advisory board of The Lancet Oncology; is remunerated for serving on the Board of Directors of Ion Beam Applications; receives stock options for serving on the Board of Directors of iCAD; and reports research funding to their institution (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Center Support Grant/Core Grant P30 CA008748) from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)–National Cancer Institute (NCI). AA reports funding to their institution from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and the NIH. GB reports research funding to their institution from the Science and Technology Facilities Council UK and reports travel support from International Council Expert Corps. MD reports research funding to their institution from Science and Technology Facilities Council UK and reports travel support from International Council Expert Corps. TE reports honoraria from the University of Washington and the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and reports receiving travel support to attend meetings from JASTRO, the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). SGr reports receiving grants from the NCI; reports consulting fees from Lumonus and the Sustainable Dialogue on Peaceful Uses; and has stock options in Harbinger Health. KH reports research funding to their institution from Novartis and Sofie Biosciences; reports consulting fees from Advanced Accelerator Applications, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bain Capital, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Convergent, Curiun, Debiopharm, EcoR1, Fusion, GE Healthcare, Immedica, Isotopen Technologien Munchen, Janssen, Merck, Molecular Partners, Nvision, POINT Biopharma, Pfizer, Radiopharm Theranostics, Telix, Theragnostics, and Ymabs; reports honoraria for lectures from PeerVoice; serves on paid advisory boards for Fusion and GE Healthcare; reports travel support from Janssen; and has stock options from Sofie Biosciences, Pharma15, Nvision, Convergent, Aktis Oncology, and AdvanCell. MSH reports research funding to their institution from the Prostate Cancer Foundation, the US Department of Defence, Movember, and the Peter MacCallum Foundation; reports clinical trial funding to their institution from Bayer and Isotopia; reports clinical trial support to their institution from the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation; reports consulting fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novartis; reports speaker fees from Janssen and AstraZeneca; reports fees to their institution for serving on the advisory board on Novartis; reports unremunerated participation in the Scientific Committee at the Australian Friends of Sheba; and is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator grant. DJ reports royalties from Elekta Oncology System, Precision X-ray System, and Modus Medical; reports license of technology to iRT; reports board membership on Break Through Cancer; reports being an advisor to ACS BrightEdge; and is a founder and stockholder in Nanovista. JK reports participation on a data safety monitoring board and advisory board from Novartis (personal fees) and reports lecture honoraria from Monrol. JSL reports research support from Clarity Pharmaceuticals and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals; has acted as an adviser of Alpha-9 Theranostics, Clarity Pharmaceuticals, Earli, Evergreen Theragnostics, Suba Therapeutics, Inhibrx, Precirix, Solve, Goldman Sachs, TPG Capital, Curie Therapeutics, NextTech Invest, and Telix Pharmaceuticals; is secretary/treasurer of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI); holds equity in Curie Therapeutics, Summit Biomedical Imaging, Telix Pharmaceuticals, and Evergreen Theragnostics; and is supported by NIH R35 CA232130. YL reports funding to their institution for the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Chair on Health Economics in Radiation Oncology (HERO)–Value-Based Radiation Oncology, for a proton beam project from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)–Applied Biomedical Research with a Primary Finality, and for the ARCHERY trial; reports unpaid positions on advisory boards for the HALT trial and PROSECCA trial; is a member of the ESTRO Scientific Council and the Belgian Board of Oncology; is co-chair of the ESTRO-HERO project; and is principal investigator of the E2-Radiate trial, a joint project of ESTRO, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). JRP reports being an unpaid chair of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) International Council. AAR received consulting fees from Novartis; received honoraria for lectures from the European Society for Medical Oncology, Sociedade Brasileira de Mastologia, and Instituto Oncoclinicas; received financial support for attending meetings from ASTRO, Congresso Gramado, and Congresso Oncolinicas; reports an unpaid leadership position at the Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia; and has stock and stock options in Grupo Oncoclinicas. MMS reports research funding to their institution from Aktis, Point Biopharma, and Telix Pharmaceuticals; reports speaker honoraria from Novartis, Ion Beam Applications, and Johnson and Johnson; and holds positions in the Africa Health Research Institute and Adcock. VV holds positions as editor of the Journal of Clinical Oncology/Global Oncology and Translational Oncology and is a member of the board for City Cancer Challenge. RLW reports research funding to their institution from Siemens Healthineers, White Rabbit AI, Fusion, Perspective Therapeutics, Rayze, and Bayer; provides consulting services to Voximetry, Molecular Targeting Technologies (MTT), Perspective, Siemens, Abdera, and Seno; reports speaker payment from Hamad Health Qatar; reports travel support from Rayze and Hamad Health Qatar; has stock options in Voximetry and MTT; is a stockholder in Clarity Pharmaceuticals; participates on advisory boards for Perspective and Fusion; is a member of the SNMMI Mars Shot Board; and was a past president of SNMMI. JSY reports funding to their institution from the NIH, the IVY Foundation, and the Falk Research Medical Trust; reports honoraria from the University of Maryland and the Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center; and holds an unpaid position in the Clinical Advisory Council at the American Brain Tumor Association. AMS reports trial funding to their institution from EMD Serono, ITM, Telix Pharmaceuticals, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, Fusion Pharmaceuticals, and Cyclotek; reports research funding to their institution from Medimmune, Antengene, Humanigen, and Telix Pharmaceuticals; is on advisory boards of Imagion and ImmunOs; reports unpaid board membership of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine and the World Federation of Nuclear Medicine and Biology; and is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (number 1177837). All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Competing Interests: Dr. ARBYN reports grants from Belgian Foundation Against Cancer, grants from the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation of the European Commission, through the RISCC Network (grant no. 847845), during the conduct of the study;

Background: In some countries, breast cancer age-standardised mortality rates have decreased by 2-4% per year since the 1990s, but others have yet to achieve this outcome. In this study, we aimed to characterise the associations between national health system characteristics and breast cancer age-standardised mortality rate, and the degree of breast cancer downstaging correlating with national age-standardised mortality rate reductions., Methods: In this population-based study, national age-standardised mortality rate estimates for women aged 69 years or younger obtained from GLOBOCAN 2020 were correlated with a broad panel of standardised national health system data as reported in the WHO Cancer Country Profiles 2020. These health system characteristics include health expenditure, the Universal Health Coverage Service Coverage Index (UHC Index), dedicated funding for early detection programmes, breast cancer early detection guidelines, referral systems, cancer plans, number of dedicated public and private cancer centres per 10 000 patients with cancer, and pathology services. We tested for differences between continuous variables using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test, and for categorical variables using the Pearson χ 2 test. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were fitted to identify associations between health system characteristics and age-standardised breast cancer mortality rates. Data on TNM stage at diagnosis were obtained from national or subnational cancer registries, supplemented by a literature review of PubMed from 2010 to 2020. Mortality trends from 1950 to 2016 were assessed using the WHO Cancer Mortality Database. The threshold for significance was set at a p value of 0·05 or less., Findings: 148 countries had complete health system data. The following variables were significantly higher in high-income countries than in low-income countries in unadjusted analyses: health expenditure (p=0·0002), UHC Index (p<0·0001), dedicated funding for early detection programmes (p=0·0020), breast cancer early detection guidelines (p<0·0001), breast cancer referral systems (p=0·0030), national cancer plans (p=0·014), cervical cancer early detection programmes (p=0·0010), number of dedicated public (p<0·0001) and private (p=0·027) cancer centres per 10 000 patients with cancer, and pathology services (p<0·0001). In adjusted multivariable regression analyses in 141 countries, two health system characteristics were significantly associated with lower age-standardised mortality rates: higher UHC Index levels (β=-0·12, 95% CI -0·16 to -0·08) and increasing numbers of public cancer centres (β=-0·23, -0·36 to -0·10). These findings indicate that each unit increase in the UHC Index was associated with a 0·12-unit decline in age-standardised mortality rates, and each additional public cancer centre per 10 000 patients with cancer was associated with a 0·23-unit decline in age-standardised mortality rate. Among 35 countries with available breast cancer TNM staging data, all 20 that achieved sustained mean reductions in age-standardised mortality rate of 2% or more per year for at least 3 consecutive years since 1990 had at least 60% of patients with invasive breast cancer presenting as stage I or II disease. Some countries achieved this reduction without most women having access to population-based mammographic screening., Interpretation: Countries with low breast cancer mortality rates are characterised by increased levels of coverage of essential health services and higher numbers of public cancer centres. Among countries achieving sustained mortality reductions, the majority of breast cancers are diagnosed at an early stage, reinforcing the value of clinical early diagnosis programmes for improving breast cancer outcomes., Funding: None., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GC reports consulting fees or honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Seagen, and Ellipsis, and also reports participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Roche and AstraZeneca. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To enable design of optimum palliative care for women with cervical cancer, we studied the most common types of suffering and their severity, prevalence, and duration., Methods: We first reviewed the literature on the major types, severity, prevalence, and duration of suffering associated with cervical cancer. We then conducted a modified Delphi process with experts in cervical cancer care to supplement the literature. For each type of suffering, we distinguished between decedents (those who die from cervical cancer in a given year) and nondecedents (those who have cervical cancer in a given year but do not die). By applying the suffering prevalence and duration estimates to the number of decedents, nondecedents, and family caregivers in 2017, we were able to estimate their palliative care needs and the intensity of palliative care needed to respond adequately to this suffering., Results: There is a high prevalence among decedents of moderate or severe pain (84%), vaginal discharge (66%), vaginal bleeding (61%), and loss of faith (31%). Among both decedents and nondecedents, there is a high prevalence of clinically significant anxiety (63% and 50%, respectively), depressed mood (52% and 38%, respectively), and sexual dysfunction (87% and 83%, respectively). Moderate or severe financial distress is prevalent among decedents, nondecedents, and family caregivers (84%, 74%, and 66%, respectively). More than 40% of decedents and nondecedents are abandoned by their intimate partners. Most patients experience some combination of moderate or severe physical, psychological, social, and spiritual suffering. In total, 258,649 decedents and 2,558,857 nondecedents needed palliative care in 2017, approximately 85% of whom were in low- and middle-income countries where palliative care is rarely accessible., Conclusion: Among women with advanced cervical cancer, suffering is highly prevalent and often severe and multifaceted., Competing Interests: Eric L. KrakauerEmployment: Inform Diagnostics, Foundation Medicine Xiaoxiao KweteEmployment: Yaozhi Co LtdStock and Other Ownership Interests: Expat IncResearch Funding: RochePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: My husband Patrick Kwete has a granted patent called Personalized Medical Treatment Provision Software (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130080425A1/en)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Expat Inc Annette HasenburgHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Med Update, Pfizer, Roche, StreamedupGmbH, Tesaro, MedConcept, LEO PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: PharmaMar, Tesaro, Roche, AstraZeneca, LEO Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline/MSDTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, MedConcept, Roche, Streamedup!, Tesaro, MedUpdate, Pfizer Cristiana SessaConsulting or Advisory Role: Basilea Ted TrimbleConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Inovio PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Frantz Viral TherapeuticsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Women with cervical cancer, especially those with advanced disease, appear to experience suffering that is more prevalent, complex, and severe than that caused by other cancers and serious illnesses, and approximately 85% live in low- and middle-income countries where palliative care is rarely accessible. To respond to the highly prevalent and extreme suffering in this vulnerable population, we convened a group of experienced experts in all aspects of care for women with cervical cancer, and from countries of all income levels, to create an essential package of palliative care for cervical cancer (EPPCCC). The EPPCCC consists of a set of interventions, medicines, simple equipment, social supports, and human resources, and is designed to be safe and effective for preventing and relieving all types of suffering associated with cervical cancer. It includes only inexpensive and readily available medicines and equipment, and its use requires only basic training. Thus, the EPPCCC can and should be made accessible everywhere, including for the rural poor. We provide guidance for integrating the EPPCCC into gynecologic and oncologic care at all levels of health care systems, and into primary care, in countries of all income levels., Competing Interests: Eric L. KrakauerEmployment: (I) My wife is employed by Inform Diagnostics and Foundation Medicine Xiaoxiao KweteEmployment: Yaozhi Co LtdStock and Other Ownership Interests: Expat IncResearch Funding: RochePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: (I) My husband Patrick Kwete has a patent called Personalized Medical Treatment Provision Software (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130080425A1/en)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Expat Inc Shekinah N. ElmoreStock and Other Ownership Interests: TeladocConsulting or Advisory Role: Best Doctors Inc, Wild Type Annette HasenburgHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Med Update, Pfizer, Roche, Streamedup!, Tesaro, MedConcept, LEO PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: PharmaMar, Tesaro, Roche, AstraZeneca, LEO Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline/MSDTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, MedConcept, Roche, Streamedup!, Tesaro, MedUpdate, Pfizer Mihir KamdarLeadership: Amorsa TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Amorsa TherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Medtronic, Fern Health Cristiana SessaConsulting or Advisory Role: Basilea Ted TrimbleConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Inovio PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Frantz Viral TherapeuticsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The essential package of palliative care for cervical cancer (EPPCCC), described elsewhere, is designed to be safe and effective for preventing and relieving most suffering associated with cervical cancer and universally accessible. However, it appears that women with cervical cancer, more frequently than patients with other cancers, experience various types of suffering that are refractory to basic palliative care such as what can be provided with the EPPCCC. In particular, relief of refractory pain, vomiting because of bowel obstruction, bleeding, and psychosocial suffering may require additional expertise, medicines, or equipment. Therefore, we convened a group of experienced experts in all aspects of care for women with cervical cancer, and from countries of all income levels, to create an augmented package of palliative care for cervical cancer with which even suffering refractory to the EPPCCC often can be relieved. The package consists of medicines, radiotherapy, surgical procedures, and psycho-oncologic therapies that require advanced or specialized training. Each item in this package should be made accessible whenever the necessary resources and expertise are available., Competing Interests: Eric L. KrakauerEmployment: (I) My wife is employed by Inform Diagnostics and Foundation Medicine Xiaoxiao KweteEmployment: Yaozhi Co LtdStock and Other Ownership Interests: Expat IncResearch Funding: RochePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: My husband Patrick Kwete has a granted patent called “Personalized Medical Treatment Provision Software” (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130080425A1/en)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Expat Inc Shekinah N. ElmoreStock and Other Ownership Interests: TeladocConsulting or Advisory Role: Best Doctors Inc, Wildtype Annette HasenburgHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Med Update, Pfizer, Roche, Streamedup!, Tesaro, MedConcept, LEO PharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: PharmaMar, Tesaro, Roche, AstraZeneca, LEO Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline/MSDTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, MedConcept, Roche, Streamedup!, Tesaro, MedUpdate, Pfizer Mihir KamdarLeadership: Amorsa TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Amorsa TherapeuticsConsulting or Advisory Role: Medtronic, Fern Health Cristiana SessaConsulting or Advisory Role: Basilea Ted TrimbleConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Inovio PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Frantz Viral TherapeuticsNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: Predicting the risk of early distant brain failure (DBF) is in demand for management decisions in patients who are candidates for local treatment of brain metastases. This study aimed to analyze the association between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and brain disease control after stereotactic radiation therapy/radiosurgery (SRT) for breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM)., Methods and Materials: We prospectively assessed CTCs before (CTC1) and 4 to 5 weeks after (CTC2) SRT and their relationship with the number of new lesions (NL) suggestive of BCBM before SRT. CTC were quantified and analyzed by immunocytochemistry to evaluate the expression of the proteins COX2, EGFR, ST6GALNAC5, NOTCH1, and HER2. Distant brain failure-free survival (DBFFS), the primary endpoint, diffuse DBFFS (D-DBFFS), and overall survival were estimated. Analysis for DBF within 6 months, with death as competing risk, was performed., Results: Patients were included between 2016 and 2018. CTCs were detected in all 39 patients before and in 34 of 35 patients after SRT. After median follow-up of 16.6 months, median DBFFS, D-DBFFS, and overall survival were 15.3, 14.1, and 19.5 months, respectively. DBF at 6 months was 40% with CTC1 ≤0.5 and 8.82% with CTC1 >0.5 CTC/mL ( P = .007), and D-DBF at 6 months was 40% with CTC1 ≤0.5 and 0 with CTC1 >0.5 CTC/mL ( P = .005) and 25% with NL/CTC1 >6.8 and 2.65% with NL/CTC1 ≤6.8 ( P = .063). On multivariate analysis, DBFFS was inferior with CTC1 ≤0.5 (hazard ratio, 8.27; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-32.3; P  = .002), and D-DBFFS was inferior with CTC1 ≤0.5 (hazard ratio, 10.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-52.41; P = .005). Protein expression was not associated with outcomes., Conclusions: These data suggest that CTC1 and NL/CTC1 may have a role as a biomarker of early diffuse DBF and as a subsequent guide between focal or whole-brain radiation therapy in patients with BCBM., (© 2021 The Author(s).)

Background: Cervical cancer is a preventable cancer; therefore, countries should provide strategic, evidence-based health services to reduce its incidence and impact on their populations. Two packages of health services that group together all the services related to cervical cancer, the Essential Cancer Package (9 interventions) and the Primary Care Package (5 interventions), are defined in this article with the aim of assessing the global status of the availability of health services and their coverage in 194 countries worldwide., Methods: The study was based on the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) Noncommunicable Disease Country Capacity Survey. Although the survey covered multiple noncommunicable diseases, this report examined only those results pertaining to cervical cancer in the 194 WHO member states divided by WHO region and World Bank income., Results: Only 21% of the countries reported providing all 9 interventions of the Essential Cancer Package, with the highest proportions being found in Europe (45.3%) and among high-income countries (HICs; 54.3%). As for the Primary Care Package, only 19.1% of countries provided all 5 interventions, with the highest proportions being found in Europe (39.6%) and among HICs (45.5%)., Conclusions: The complete development and appropriate coverage of each service listed in both the Essential Cancer Package and the Primary Care Package are essential to reduce the impact of cervical cancer worldwide, and they should be integrated into all cancer control planning efforts., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Introduction: Cervical cancer is controllable through appropriate interventions such as vaccination, screening, treatment, early diagnosis and palliative care. The greatest burden of cervical cancer lies in low-income countries (LIC) where most of these services are missing or developed asymmetrically. Indeed, it is important to have not just an expansion, but a symmetric and concordant development of each service. Therefore, policies of countries should be aligned to provide concordant services and achieve the best outcomes with available resources. This is called 'policy cohesion' and for the first time in literature we will analyse cervical cancer policy coherence in all the 194 WHO member states., Methods: The study is based on the 2017 WHO Non-Communicable Disease Country Capacity Surveys (NCD CCS). Although the survey covers multiple non-communicable diseases, in this report we will only discuss those results pertaining to cervical cancer, analysing the cervical cancer policy cohesion of 194 WHO member states, divided by WHO region and World Bank income group., Results: Human papilloma virus vaccination exists in 53% of countries. 76% of countries offer cervical screening: among these countries, treatment, early diagnosis guidelines and palliative care are missing in 13%, 13% and 40%, respectively. In the African region, this discord is even more profound: 32%, 17% and 60%, respectively., Conclusion: Especially in those settings where resources are limited, early detection guidelines, treatment and palliative care should be implemented along with secondary prevention strategies. Symmetric development of concordant cervical cancer services maximises cervical cancer control efficacy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)

Background: The WHO Director-General has issued a call for action to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem. To help inform global efforts, we modelled potential human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and cervical screening scenarios in low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) to examine the feasibility and timing of elimination at different thresholds, and to estimate the number of cervical cancer cases averted on the path to elimination., Methods: The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC), which consists of three independent transmission-dynamic models identified by WHO according to predefined criteria, projected reductions in cervical cancer incidence over time in 78 LMICs for three standardised base-case scenarios: girls-only vaccination; girls-only vaccination and once-lifetime screening; and girls-only vaccination and twice-lifetime screening. Girls were vaccinated at age 9 years (with a catch-up to age 14 years), assuming 90% coverage and 100% lifetime protection against HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. Cervical screening involved HPV testing once or twice per lifetime at ages 35 years and 45 years, with uptake increasing from 45% (2023) to 90% (2045 onwards). The elimination thresholds examined were an average age-standardised cervical cancer incidence of four or fewer cases per 100 000 women-years and ten or fewer cases per 100 000 women-years, and an 85% or greater reduction in incidence. Sensitivity analyses were done, varying vaccination and screening strategies and assumptions. We summarised results using the median (range) of model predictions., Findings: Girls-only HPV vaccination was predicted to reduce the median age-standardised cervical cancer incidence in LMICs from 19·8 (range 19·4-19·8) to 2·1 (2·0-2·6) cases per 100 000 women-years over the next century (89·4% [86·2-90·1] reduction), and to avert 61·0 million (60·5-63·0) cases during this period. Adding twice-lifetime screening reduced the incidence to 0·7 (0·6-1·6) cases per 100 000 women-years (96·7% [91·3-96·7] reduction) and averted an extra 12·1 million (9·5-13·7) cases. Girls-only vaccination was predicted to result in elimination in 60% (58-65) of LMICs based on the threshold of four or fewer cases per 100 000 women-years, in 99% (89-100) of LMICs based on the threshold of ten or fewer cases per 100 000 women-years, and in 87% (37-99) of LMICs based on the 85% or greater reduction threshold. When adding twice-lifetime screening, 100% (71-100) of LMICs reached elimination for all three thresholds. In regions in which all countries can achieve cervical cancer elimination with girls-only vaccination, elimination could occur between 2059 and 2102, depending on the threshold and region. Introducing twice-lifetime screening accelerated elimination by 11-31 years. Long-term vaccine protection was required for elimination., Interpretation: Predictions were consistent across our three models and suggest that high HPV vaccination coverage of girls can lead to cervical cancer elimination in most LMICs by the end of the century. Screening with high uptake will expedite reductions and will be necessary to eliminate cervical cancer in countries with the highest burden., Funding: WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, Compute Canada, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia Centre for Research Excellence in Cervical Cancer Control., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: WHO is developing a global strategy towards eliminating cervical cancer as a public health problem, which proposes an elimination threshold of four cases per 100 000 women and includes 2030 triple-intervention coverage targets for scale-up of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination to 90%, twice-lifetime cervical screening to 70%, and treatment of pre-invasive lesions and invasive cancer to 90%. We assessed the impact of achieving the 90-70-90 triple-intervention targets on cervical cancer mortality and deaths averted over the next century. We also assessed the potential for the elimination initiative to support target 3.4 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)-a one-third reduction in premature mortality from non-communicable diseases by 2030., Methods: The WHO Cervical Cancer Elimination Modelling Consortium (CCEMC) involves three independent, dynamic models of HPV infection, cervical carcinogenesis, screening, and precancer and invasive cancer treatment. Reductions in age-standardised rates of cervical cancer mortality in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) were estimated for three core scenarios: girls-only vaccination at age 9 years with catch-up for girls aged 10-14 years; girls-only vaccination plus once-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up; and girls-only vaccination plus twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment scale-up. Vaccination was assumed to provide 100% lifetime protection against infections with HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, and to scale up to 90% coverage in 2020. Cervical screening involved HPV testing at age 35 years, or at ages 35 years and 45 years, with scale-up to 45% coverage by 2023, 70% by 2030, and 90% by 2045, and we assumed that 50% of women with invasive cervical cancer would receive appropriate surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy by 2023, which would increase to 90% by 2030. We summarised results using the median (range) of model predictions., Findings: In 2020, the estimated cervical cancer mortality rate across all 78 LMICs was 13·2 (range 12·9-14·1) per 100 000 women. Compared to the status quo, by 2030, vaccination alone would have minimal impact on cervical cancer mortality, leading to a 0·1% (0·1-0·5) reduction, but additionally scaling up twice-lifetime screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 34·2% (23·3-37·8), averting 300 000 (300 000-400 000) deaths by 2030 (with similar results for once-lifetime screening). By 2070, scaling up vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 61·7% (61·4-66·1), averting 4·8 million (4·1-4·8) deaths. By 2070, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 88·9% (84·0-89·3), averting 13·3 million (13·1-13·6) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 92·3% (88·4-93·0), averting 14·6 million (14·1-14·6) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). By 2120, vaccination alone would reduce mortality by 89·5% (86·6-89·9), averting 45·8 million (44·7-46·4) deaths. By 2120, additionally scaling up screening and cancer treatment would reduce mortality by 97·9% (95·0-98·0), averting 60·8 million (60·2-61·2) deaths (with once-lifetime screening), or by 98·6% (96·5-98·6), averting 62·6 million (62·1-62·8) deaths (with twice-lifetime screening). With the WHO triple-intervention strategy, over the next 10 years, about half (48% [45-55]) of deaths averted would be in sub-Saharan Africa and almost a third (32% [29-34]) would be in South Asia; over the next 100 years, almost 90% of deaths averted would be in these regions. For premature deaths (age 30-69 years), the WHO triple-intervention strategy would result in rate reductions of 33·9% (24·4-37·9) by 2030, 96·2% (94·3-96·8) by 2070, and 98·6% (96·9-98·8) by 2120., Interpretation: These findings emphasise the importance of acting immediately on three fronts to scale up vaccination, screening, and treatment for pre-invasive and invasive cervical cancer. In the next 10 years, a one-third reduction in the rate of premature mortality from cervical cancer in LMICs is possible, contributing to the realisation of the 2030 UN SDGs. Over the next century, successful implementation of the WHO elimination strategy would reduce cervical cancer mortality by almost 99% and save more than 62 million women's lives., Funding: WHO, UNDP, UN Population Fund, UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Program of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Germany Federal Ministry of Health, National Health and Medical Research Council Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Cervical Cancer Control, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Compute Canada, and Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: The planning of national radiotherapy (RT) services requires a thorough knowledge of the country's cancer epidemiology profile, the radiotherapy utilization (RTU) rates and a future projection of these data. Previous studies have established RTU rates in high-income countries., Methods: Optimal RTU (oRTU) rates were determined for nine middle-income countries, following the epidemiological evidence-based method. The actual RTU (aRTU) rates were calculated dividing the total number of new notifiable cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in 2012 by the total number of cancer patients diagnosed in the same year in each country. An analysis of the characteristics of patients and treatments in a series of 300 consecutive radiotherapy patients shed light on the particular patient and treatments profile in the participating countries., Results: The median oRTU rate for the group of nine countries was 52% (47-56%). The median aRTU rate for the nine countries was 28% (9-46%). These results show that the real proportion of cancer patients receiving RT is lower than the optimal RTU with a rate difference between 10-42.7%. The median percent-unmet need was 47% (18-82.3%)., Conclusions: The optimal RTU rate in middle-income countries did not differ significantly from that previously found in high-income countries. The actual RTU rates were consistently lower than the optimal, in particular in countries with limited resources and a large population., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The quality of radiotherapy services in post-Soviet countries has not yet been studied following a formal methodology. The IAEA conducted a survey using two sets of validated radiation oncology quality indicators (ROIs)., Methods: Eleven post-Soviet countries were assessed. A coordinator was designated for each country and acted as the liaison between the country and the IAEA. The methodology was a one-time cross-sectional survey using a 58-question tool in Russian. The questionnaire was based on two validated sets of ROIs: for radiotherapy centres, the indicators proposed by Cionini et al., and for data at the country level, the Australasian ROIs., Results: The overall response ratio was 66.3%, but for the Russian Federation, it was 24%. Data were updated on radiotherapy infrastructure and equipment. 256 radiotherapy centres are operating 275 linear accelerators and 337 Cobalt-60 units. 61% of teletherapy machines are older than ten years. Analysis of ROIs revealed significant differences between these countries and radiotherapy practices in the West. Naming, task profile and education programmes of radiotherapy professionals are different than in the West., Conclusions: Most countries need modernization of their radiotherapy infrastructure coupled with adequate staffing numbers and updated education programmes focusing on evidence-based medicine, quality, and safety., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions) was recently shown in a randomized phase III trial to be non-inferior to 40 Gy in 15 fractions in elderly and/or frail patients with glioblastoma multiforme. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of the two regimens., Material and Methods: The direct unit costs of imaging, radiotherapy (RT), and dexamethasone were collected from the five primary contributing countries to the trial, constituting the data of 88% of all patients. Effectiveness was measured by the restricted mean overall survival (RMOS) and progression free survival (RMPFS). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. Indirect costs were also estimated for comparison., Results: The median OSs for the short-course and commonly used RTs were 8.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.1-10.3) and 7.7 (95% CI 5.5-9.9) months, respectively (log rank p = 0.340). Median PFSs were also not different (p = 0.686). The differences in the RMOS and the ICER, however, were +0.11 life-years and -$3062 United States dollars (USD) per life-year gained, respectively. The differences in the RMPFS and the ICER were +0.02 PFS and -$17,693 USD, respectively., Conclusion: The ICER of -$3062 per life-year gained and -$17,693 per PFS gained indicates that the short-course RT is less costly compared to the longer RT regimen., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: To perform a subset analysis of survival outcomes in elderly patients with glioblastoma from a randomized phase 3 trial comparing 2 short-course radiation therapy (RT) regimens in elderly and/or frail patients., Methods and Materials: The original trial population included elderly and/or frail patients with a diagnosis of glioblastoma. Patients joined the phase 3, randomized, multicenter, prospective, noninferiority trial; were assigned to 1 of 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio, either short-course RT (25 Gy in 5 fractions, arm 1) or commonly used RT (40 Gy in 15 fractions, arm 2); and were stratified by age (<65 years and ≥65 years), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and extent of surgery. For the subset analysis in this study, only patients aged ≥65 years were evaluated (elderly and frail patients were defined as patients aged ≥65 years with KPS of 50%-70%; elderly and non-frail patients were defined as patients aged ≥65 years with KPS of 80%-100%); 61 of the 98 initial patients comprised the patient population, with 26 patients randomized to arm 1 and 35 to arm 2., Results: In this unplanned analysis, the short-course RT results were not statistically significantly different from the results of commonly used RT in elderly patients. The median overall survival time was 6.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-9.1 months) in arm 1 and 6.2 months (95% CI, 4.7-7.7 months) in arm 2 (P=.936). The median progression-free survival time was 4.3 months (95% CI, 2.6-5.9 months) in arm 1 and 3.2 months (95% CI, 0.1-6.3 months) in arm 2 (P=.706)., Conclusions: A short-course RT regimen of 25 Gy in 5 fractions is an acceptable treatment option for patients aged ≥65 years, mainly those with a poor performance status or contraindication to chemotherapy, which would be indicated in cases of methylated O6 methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase promoter tumors., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Most cervix cancer cases occur in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC), and outcomes are suboptimal, even for early stage disease. Brachytherapy plays a central role in the treatment paradigm, improving both local control and overall survival. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) aims to provide guidelines for brachytherapy delivery in resource-limited settings., Methods and Materials: A panel of clinicians and physicists with expertise in brachytherapy administration in LMIC was convened. A survey was developed to identify practice patterns at the authors' institutions and was also extended to participants of the Cervix Cancer Research Network. The scientific literature was reviewed to identify consensus papers or review articles with a focus on treatment of locally advanced, unresected cervical cancer in LMIC., Results: Of the 40 participants invited to respond to the survey, 32 responded (response rate 80%). Participants were practicing in 14 different countries including both high-income (China, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States) and low-income or middle-income countries (Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam). Recommendations for modifications to existing ABS guidelines were reviewed by the panel members and are highlighted in this article., Conclusions: Recommendations for treatment of locally advanced, unresectable cervical cancer in LMIC are presented. The guidelines comment on staging, external beam radiotherapy, use of concurrent chemotherapy, overall treatment duration, use of anesthesia, applicator choice and placement verification, brachytherapy treatment planning including dose and prescription point, recommended reporting and documentation, physics support, and follow-up., (Copyright © 2016 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: To assess the impact of a standardized delineation protocol and training interventions on PET/CT-based target volume delineation (TVD) in NSCLC in a multicenter setting., Material and Methods: Over a one-year period, 11 pairs, comprised each of a radiation oncologist and nuclear medicine physician with limited experience in PET/CT-based TVD for NSCLC from nine different countries took part in a training program through an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) study (NCT02247713). Teams delineated gross tumor volume of the primary tumor, during and after training interventions, according to a provided delineation protocol. In-house developed software recorded the performed delineations, to allow visual inspection of strategies and to assess delineation accuracy., Results: Following the first training, overall concordance indices for 3 repetitive cases increased from 0.57±0.07 to 0.66±0.07. The overall mean surface distance between observer and expert contours decreased from -0.40±0.03cm to -0.01±0.33cm. After further training overall concordance indices for another 3 repetitive cases further increased from 0.64±0.06 to 0.80±0.05 (p=0.01). Mean surface distances decreased from -0.34±0.16cm to -0.05±0.20cm (p=0.01)., Conclusion: Multiple training interventions improve PET/CT-based TVD delineation accuracy in NSCLC and reduce interobserver variation., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Optimal treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (rGBM) in elderly and/or frail patients remains virtually unexplored, the best supportive care (BSC) only is routinely administered due to the fatal prognosis. We evaluated the impact of different treatment methods on post-progression survival (PPS) and overall survival (OS) of such patients. Data from 98 elderly and/or frail rGBM patients, treated initially with 1-week or 3-week radiotherapy (RT) within the phase III IAEA study (2010-2013), were analyzed. KPS at relapse and salvage treatment methods were recorded. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PPS and OS for different treatment modalities. Eighty-four patients experienced recurrence: 47 (56%) received BSC, 21 (25%)-chemotherapy (CHT), 8 (9.5%)-surgery, 3 (3.5%)-RT, for 5 (6%) the data was unavailable. Median OS from randomization for all 84 patients was 35 weeks: 55 versus 30 weeks for any treatment versus BSC, p < 0.0001. Median PPS was 15 weeks: 23 weeks with any treatment versus 9 weeks with BSC, p < 0.0001. For local treatment (surgery and/or RT) median PPS was 51 versus 21 weeks for CHT, p = 0.36. In patients with poor KPS (≤60) at relapse median PPS was 9 weeks with BSC versus 21 weeks with any treatment, p = 0.014. In poor KPS patients median PPS for local treatment was 14 weeks versus 21 weeks with CHT, p = 0.88. An active therapeutic approach may be beneficial for selected elderly and/or frail rGBM patients. Poor KPS patients may also benefit from active treatment, but there is no benefit of local treatment over CHT.

Purpose: The optimal radiotherapy regimen for elderly and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma remains to be established. This study compared two radiotherapy regimens on the outcome of these patients., Patients and Methods: Between 2010 and 2013, 98 patients (frail = age ≥ 50 years and Karnofsky performance status [KPS] of 50% to 70%; elderly and frail = age ≥ 65 years and KPS of 50% to 70%; elderly = age ≥ 65 years and KPS of 80% to 100%) were prospectively randomly assigned to two arms in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by age (< and ≥ 65 years old), KPS, and extent of surgical resection. Arm 1 received short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five daily fractions over 1 week), and arm 2 received commonly used radiotherapy (40 Gy in 15 daily fractions over 3 weeks)., Results: The short-course radiotherapy was noninferior to commonly used radiotherapy. The median overall survival time was 7.9 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 9.6 months) in arm 1 and 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.6 months) in arm 2 (P = .988). Median progression-free survival time was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 5.9) in arm 1 and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.6 to 5.7) in arm B (P = .716). With a median follow-up time of 6.3 months, the quality of life between both arms at 4 weeks after treatment and 8 weeks after treatment was not different., Conclusion: There were no differences in overall survival time, progression-free survival time, and quality of life between patients receiving the two radiotherapy regimens. In view of the reduced treatment time, the short 1-week radiotherapy regimen may be recommended as a treatment option for elderly and/or frail patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma., (© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Purpose: Upfront quality assurance (QA) is considered essential when starting a multicenter clinical trial in radiotherapy. Despite the long experience gained for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) trials, there are only limited audit QA methods for brachytherapy (BT) and none include the specific aspects of image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT)., Methods and Materials: EMBRACE is a prospective multicenter trial aiming to assess the impact of (MRI)-based IGABT in locally advanced cervical cancer. An EMBRACE dummy run was designed to identify sources and magnitude of uncertainties and errors considered important for the evaluation of clinical, and dosimetric parameters and their relation to outcome. Contouring, treatment planning and dose reporting was evaluated and scored with a categorical scale of 1-10. Active feedback to centers was provided to improve protocol compliance and reporting. A second dummy run was required in case of major deviations (score <7) for any item., Results: Overall 27/30 centers passed the dummy run. 16 centers had to repeat the dummy run in order to clarify major inconsistencies to the protocol. The most pronounced variations were related to contouring for both EBRT and BT. Centers with experience in IGABT (>30 cases) had better performance as compared to centers with limited experience., Conclusion: The comprehensive dummy run designed for the EMBRACE trial has been a feasible tool for QA in IGABT of cervix cancer. It should be considered for future IGABT trials and could serve as the basis for continuous quality checks for brachytherapy centers., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: To determine the optimal single-dose radiotherapy schedule for pain from bone metastases in a multi-centre, international, randomised trial., Patients and Methods: 651 patients were randomised to either 8Gy (n=325) or 4Gy (n=326) radiotherapy. Pain at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52weeks was assessed using a Categorical Scale (CS) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The primary endpoint was response at 4weeks., Results: There was no significant difference in patient demographics and other co-variates. The complete response (CR) rate and ORR (complete or partial response) for all follow-up times were higher after 8Gy (p=0.02). The Kaplan-Meier actuarial rate (categorical scale) at 4weeks for ORR was 80% after 8Gy compared to 68% after 4Gy (p=0.0015). 117 re-treatments were given of which 72 were in the 4Gy group and 45 in 8Gy arm (p=0.01)., Conclusions: There was a marked consistent difference in pain relief at all time points in favour of 8Gy. These data reinforce the case for single dose 8Gy radiotherapy to be recommended for metastatic bone pain in all healthcare settings., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This document describes best practice and evidence based recommendations for the use of FDG-PET/CT for the purposes of radiotherapy target volume delineation (TVD) for curative intent treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These recommendations have been written by an expert advisory group, convened by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to facilitate a Coordinated Research Project (CRP) aiming to improve the applications of PET based radiation treatment planning (RTP) in low and middle income countries. These guidelines can be applied in routine clinical practice of radiotherapy TVD, for NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation or radiotherapy alone, where FDG is used, and where a calibrated PET camera system equipped for RTP patient positioning is available. Recommendations are provided for PET and CT image visualization and interpretation, and for tumor delineation using planning CT with and without breathing motion compensation., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: To optimize palliation in incurable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a prospective randomized study (NCT00864331) comparing protracted palliative radiotherapy (RT) course with chemotherapy (CHT) followed by short-course palliative RT., Methods and Materials: Treatment-naive patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC, stage IIIA/IIIB, received either 39Gy in 13 fractions as RT alone (arm A, n=31) or 2-3 platinum-based CHT cycles followed by 10Gy in a single fraction or 16Gy in 2 fractions separated by one week (arm B, n=34). Primary outcome was overall survival., Results: Treatment groups were balanced with respect to various variables. Median survival for all 65 patients was 8months, while median survival was 7.1 and 8.1months for the two arms, respectively (log-rank p=0.4 by study arm, and p=0.6 by Cox regression and stratified by country and sub-stage). One and three year survival rates for the two arms were 29%, and 9% and 41%, and 6%, respectively. There were no differences in any of the following endpoints: any failure, local failure, regional failure, contralateral thoracic failure, and distant failure between the two arms. High-grade (⩾3) toxicity was similar between the two arms. Symptoms, adverse events of any kind, KPS and body-mass index, were not different during treatment and during follow-up. There was no grade 5 toxicity., Conclusions: This incomplete and underpowered trial only hinted similar outcome between the treatment arms. Therefore, combined CHT-RT can perhaps be considered, in limited resource setting, where access to RT remains inadequate., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Optimal radiotherapy utilisation rate (RTU) is the proportion of all cancer cases that should receive radiotherapy. Optimal RTU was estimated for 9 Middle Income Countries as part of a larger IAEA project to better understand RTU and stage distribution., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To review the various radiation therapy quality assurance (RTQA) procedures used by the Global Clinical Trials RTQA Harmonization Group (GHG) steering committee members and present the harmonized RTQA naming conventions by amalgamating procedures with similar objectives., Methods and Materials: A survey of the GHG steering committee members' RTQA procedures, their goals, and naming conventions was conducted. The RTQA procedures were classified as baseline, preaccrual, and prospective/retrospective data capture and analysis. After all the procedures were accumulated and described, extensive discussions took place to come to harmonized RTQA procedures and names., Results: The RTQA procedures implemented within a trial by the GHG steering committee members vary in quantity, timing, name, and compliance criteria. The procedures of each member are based on perceived chances of noncompliance, so that the quality of radiation therapy planning and treatment does not negatively influence the trial measured outcomes. A comparison of these procedures demonstrated similarities among the goals of the various methods, but the naming given to each differed. After thorough discussions, the GHG steering committee members amalgamated the 27 RTQA procedures to 10 harmonized ones with corresponding names: facility questionnaire, beam output audit, benchmark case, dummy run, complex treatment dosimetry check, virtual phantom, individual case review, review of patients' treatment records, and protocol compliance and dosimetry site visit., Conclusions: Harmonized RTQA harmonized naming conventions, which can be used in all future clinical trials involving radiation therapy, have been established. Harmonized procedures will facilitate future intergroup trial collaboration and help to ensure comparable RTQA between international trials, which enables meta-analyses and reduces RTQA workload for intergroup studies., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-morphologic differences in parametrial infiltration on tumour response during primary radiochemotherapy in cervical cancer., Material and Methods: Eighty-five consecutive cervical cancer patients with FIGO stages IIB (n = 59) and IIIB (n = 26), treated by external beam radiotherapy (± chemotherapy) and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy, underwent T2-weighted MRI at the time of diagnosis and at the time of brachytherapy. MRI patterns of parametrial tumour infiltration at the time of diagnosis were assessed with regard to predominant morphology and maximum extent of parametrial tumour infiltration and were stratified into five tumour groups (TG): 1) expansive with spiculae; 2) expansive with spiculae and infiltrating parts; 3) infiltrative into the inner third of the parametrial space (PM); 4) infiltrative into the middle third of the PM; and 5) infiltrative into the outer third of the PM. MRI at the time of brachytherapy was used for identifying presence (residual vs. no residual disease) and signal intensity (high vs. intermediate) of residual disease within the PM. Left and right PM of each patient were evaluated separately at both time points. The impact of the TG on tumour remission status within the PM was analysed using χ(2)-test and logistic regression analysis., Results: In total, 170 PM were analysed. The TG 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 were present in 12%, 11%, 35%, 25% and 12% of the cases, respectively. Five percent of the PM were tumour-free. Residual tumour in the PM was identified in 19%, 68%, 88%, 90% and 85% of the PM for the TG 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. The TG 3-5 had significantly higher rates of residual tumour in the PM in comparison to TG 1 + 2 (88% vs. 43%, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: MRI-morphologic features of PM infiltration appear to allow for prediction of tumour response during external beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy. A predominantly infiltrative tumour spread at the time of diagnosis resulted in a significantly higher rate of residual tumour in the PM at the time of brachytherapy in comparison to a predominantly expansive tumour spread.

Background and Aim: We aimed to quantify target volume delineation uncertainties in cervix cancer image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT)., Materials and Methods: Ten radiation oncologists delineated gross tumour volume (GTV), high- and intermediate-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV, IR CTV) in six patients. Their contours were compared with two reference delineations (STAPLE-Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation and EC- expert consensus) by calculating volumetric and planar conformity index (VCI and PCI) and inter-delineation distances (IDD)., Results: VCISTAPLE and VCIEC were 0.76 and 0.72 for HR CTV, 0.77 and 0.68 for IR CTV and 0.59 and 0.58 for GTV. Variation was most prominent caudally and cranially in all target volumes and posterolaterally in IR CTV. IDDSTAPLE and IDDEC for HR CTV (3.6±3.5 and 3.8±3.4 mm) were significantly lower than for GTV (4.8±4.2 and 4.2±3.5 mm) and IR CTV (4.7±5.2 and 5.2±5.6 mm) (p<0.05)., Conclusions: Due to lower delineation uncertainties when compared to GTV and IR CTV, HR CTV may be considered most robust volume for dose prescription and optimization in cervix cancer IGABT. Adequate imaging, training and use of contouring recommendations are main strategies to minimize delineation uncertainties., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose and Background: To study the dosimetric impact of interobserver delineation variability (IODV) in MRI-based cervical cancer brachytherapy., Materials and Methods: MR images of six patients were distributed to 10 experienced observers worldwide. They were asked to delineate the target volumes and the organs at risk (OARs) for each patient. Two types of reference contours were created (Expert Consensus - EC and Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation - STAPLE). Optimised plans based on both EC- and STAPLE-contours were prepared. These plans were transferred to each of the observer contour sets and the resulting DVH parameters (D(90) and D(2cc)) were calculated. For each patient the standard deviation (SD) for the 10 observers was calculated., Results: A mean relative SD of 8-10% was found for GTV and High Risk CTV (HR-CTV) D(90) analysing one single fraction. For rectum and bladder the mean relative SD for D(2cc) was 5-8% while sigmoid was at 11%. For the whole treatment the IODV in HR-CTV caused an uncertainty of ±5 Gy(α/β=10) (1SD). The corresponding figure for OARs was ±2-3 Gy(α/β=3). The results were not sensitive as to which structure set was used for the optimisation., Conclusions: For the target volumes the dosimetric impact of IODV was smallest for the GTV and HR-CTV, while IODV had an even smaller impact on the bladder and rectum., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the clinical feasibility of magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for patients with locally advanced vaginal cancer and to report treatment outcomes., Methods and Materials: Thirteen patients with vaginal cancer were treated with external beam radiotherapy (45-50.4 Gy) plus IGABT with or without chemotherapy. Distribution of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages among patients were as follows: 4 patients had Stage II cancer, 5 patients had Stage III cancer, and 4 patients had Stage IV cancer. The concept of IGABT as developed for cervix cancer was transferred and adapted for vaginal cancer, with corresponding treatment planning and reporting. Doses were converted to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy, applying the linear quadratic model (α/β = 10 Gy for tumor; α/β = 3 for organs at risk). Endpoints studied were gross tumor volume (GTV), dose-volume parameters for high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV), and organs at risk, local control (LC), adverse side effects, and survival., Results: The mean GTV (± 1 standard deviation) at diagnosis was 45.3 (±30) cm(3), and the mean GTV at brachytherapy was 10 (±14) cm(3). The mean D90 for the HRCTV was 86 (±13) Gy. The mean D2cc for bladder, urethra, rectum, and sigmoid colon were 80 (±20) Gy, 76 (±16) Gy, 70 (±9) Gy, and 60 (±9) Gy, respectively. After a median follow-up of 43 months (range, 19-87 months), one local recurrence and two distant metastases cases were observed. Actuarial LC and overall survival rates at 3 years were 92% and 85%. One patient with Stage IVA and 1 patient with Stage III disease experienced fistulas (one vesicovaginal, one rectovaginal), and 1 patient developed periurethral necrosis., Conclusions: The concept of IGABT, originally developed for treating cervix cancer, appears to be applicable to vaginal cancer treatment with only minor adaptations. Dose-volume parameters for HRCTV and organs at risk are in a comparable range. First clinical results indicate excellent LC. Further prospective multicenter studies are needed to establish this method and to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The study aimed to determine whether post-radiation vaginal side effects in cervical cancer patients can be correlated with DVH parameter D(2cc). The result was negative in that no correlation could be demonstrated between D(2cc) and the presence and grade of side effects in this patients' subset treated with high brachytherapy doses., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: To analyse dose-response relationships for local control of cervical cancer after MR image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) based on dose-volume histogram parameters., Methods and Materials: The analysis includes 141 patients with cervix cancer (stages IB-IVA) treated with 45-50.4 Gy EBRT+/-cisplatin plus 4 x 7 Gy IGBT. Gross tumour volume (GTV), high risk clinical target volume (HR CTV) and intermediate risk CTV (IR CTV) were delineated and DVH parameters (D90, D100) were assessed. Doses were converted to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) using linear-quadratic model (alpha/beta=10 Gy). Groups of patients were formed according to tumour size at diagnosis (GTV(D)) of 2-5 cm (group 1) or >5 cm (2), with subgroups of the latter for HR CTV size at first IGBT 2-5 cm (2a) or >5 cm (2b). Dose-response dependence for local recurrence was evaluated by logit analysis., Results: Eighteen local recurrences in the true pelvis were observed. Dose-response analyses revealed a significant effect of HR CTV D100 (p=0.02) and D90 (p=0.005). The ED50-values for tumour control were 33+/-15 Gy (D100) and 45+/-19 Gy (D90). ED90-values were 67 Gy (95% confidence interval [50;104]) and 86 Gy [77;113], respectively., Conclusions: A significant dependence of local control on D100 and D90 for HR CTV was found. Tumour control rates of >90% can be expected at doses >67 Gy and 86 Gy, respectively.

Purpose: To test the feasibility of a new inverse planning technology based on the Hybrid Inverse treatment Planning and Optimisation (HIPO) algorithm for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy in comparison to conventional manual optimisation as applied in recent clinical practice based on long-term intracavitary cervical cancer brachytherapy experience., Materials and Methods: The clinically applied treatment plans of 10 tandem/ring (T/R) and 10 cases with additional needles (T/R+N) planned with PLATO v14.3 were included. Standard loading patterns were manually optimised to reach an optimal coverage with 7 Gy per fraction to the High Risk CTV and to fulfil dose constraints for organs at risk. For each of these patients an inverse plan was retrospectively created with Oncentra GYN v0.9.14. Anatomy based automatic source activation was based on the topography of target and organs. The HIPO algorithm included individual gradient and modification restrictions for the T/R and needle dwell times to preserve the spatial high-dose distribution as known from the long-term clinical experience in the standard cervical cancer brachytherapy and with manual planning., Results: HIPO could achieve a better target coverage (V100) for all T/R and 7 T/R+N patients. Changes in the shape of the overdose volume (V200/400) were limited. The D(2 cc) per fraction for bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon was on average lower by 0.2 Gy, 0.4 Gy, 0.2 Gy, respectively, for T/R patients and 0.6 Gy, 0.3 Gy, 0.3 Gy for T/R+N patients (a decrease from 4.5 to 4 Gy per fraction means a total dose reduction of 5 Gy EQD2 for a 4-fraction schedule). In general the dwell times in the additional needles were lower compared to manual planning. The sparing factors were always better for HIPO plans. Additionally, in 7 T/R and 7 T/R+N patients all three D(0.1 cc), D(1 cc) and D(2 cc) for vagina wall were lower and a smaller area of vagina was covered by the reference dose in HIPO plans. Overall loading times in the tandem, the ring and the needles, as well as dose distribution, were largely preserved with adaptations performed due to specific topographical variations, in particular in lateral and caudal directions., Conclusions: Inverse planning based on the HIPO algorithm can produce treatment plans for cervical cancer brachytherapy which are comparable to plans based on manual optimisation as applied in clinical practice. It is essential to take into account the spatial dose distribution in addition to the DVH-based constraints. The proposed inverse planning concept is feasible for improving the therapeutic ratio and limiting substantial high-dose regions around needles.

Purpose: To investigate the value of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for predicting local control in magnetic resonance (MR) image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) for patients with cervical cancer., Methods and Materials: Our study population consists of 141 patients with cervical cancer (Stages IB-IVA) treated with 45-50 Gy external beam radiotherapy plus four times 7 Gy IGBT with or without cisplatin. Gross tumor volume (GTV), high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV), and intermediate-risk clinical target volume (IRCTV) were contoured, and DVH parameters (minimum dose delivered to 90% of the volume of interest [D90] and D100) were assessed. Doses were converted to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) by applying the linear quadratic model (alpha/beta = 10 Gy). Groups were defined for patients with or without local recurrence (LR) in the true pelvis for tumor size at diagnosis (GTV at diagnosis [GTVD] of 2-5 cm (Group 1) or greater than 5 cm (Group 2) and for tumor size response at IGBT (HRCTV) of 2-5 cm (Group 2a) or greater than 5 cm (Group 2b)., Results: Eighteen LRs were observed. The most important DVH parameters correlated with LR were the D90 and D100 for HRCTV. Mean D90 and D100 values for HRCTV were 86 +/- 16 and 65 +/- 10 Gy, respectively. The D90 for HRCTV greater than 87 Gy resulted in an LR incidence of 4% (3 of 68) compared with 20% (15 of 73) for D90 less than 87 Gy. The effect was most pronounced in the tumor group (Group 2b)., Conclusions: We showed an increase in local control in IGBT in patients with cervical cancer with the dose delivered, which can be expressed by the D90 and D100 for HRCTV. Local control rates greater than 95% can be achieved if the D90 (EQD2) for HRCTV is 87 Gy or greater.

Purpose: Most radioimmunotherapy studies on radiolabeled antibody distribution are based on autoradiographic and radioluminographic data, which provide a lack of detailed information due to low resolution. We used fluorescently labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) antibody (A5B7) to investigate quantitatively the kinetics and microdistribution of antibody in a clinically relevant orthotopic colorectal cancer model (LS174T) using high-resolution digital microscopy., Experimental Design: Nude mice bearing LS174T liver orthotopic tumors received a single i.v. injection of fluorescently labeled A5B7 and were sacrificed at 10 minutes, 1 hour, or 24 hours postinjection. Before sacrifice, mice were injected with the perfusion marker Hoechst 33342. An anti-CD31 antibody was used to detect blood vessel distribution. Cryostat sections were processed with immunofluorescence procedures and analyzed with fluorescence microscopy and image analysis techniques. The fluorescence images were related to morphologic images of the same or adjacent tumor sections., Results: Fluorescently labeled antibody showed rapid, selective uptake into tumor deposits, with a strong negative correlation with tumor size at 10 minutes and 1 hour (P < or = 0.01). By 24 hours, the correlation was no longer significant. The study showed movement of antibody across the tumor with time and a tendency to localize more uniformly by later time points (24 hours). The rate of antibody motility was similar in small and large tumor metastases, but small deposits showed more rapid antibody localization. Intratumoral vessels were positively related to tumor size (P < or = 0.001)., Conclusion: The obtained data suggest that radioimmunotherapy can be highly efficient in an adjuvant or minimal residual disease setting.

Introduction: Image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer, using mainly MRI, is an evolving method, increasingly replacing the 2D approach based on conventional radiography. During the complex 4D chain of this procedure image-assistance is provided for disease assessment, provisional treatment planning ("pre-planning"), applicator placement and reconstruction, as well as for contouring, definitive treatment planning and quality control of dose delivery. With IGABT changes of topography adjacent to the applicator, caused by tumour regression, oedema, organ changes and dilation are identified. Thus, the CTV for IGABT is primarily based on the tumour volume at the time of BT and takes into account both time and spatial domains. IGABT requires systematic concepts for target, OAR, biological modelling, DVH analysis, and dose-volume-adaptation., Methods and Results: This report focuses on the advantages and uncertainties, dose-effect relations and clinical results of the IGABT procedure addressing the current status and future perspectives. Uncertainties during the 4D chain of IGABT are mainly related to target contouring, applicator reconstruction, as well as to inter-fraction, intra-fraction and inter-application variability, as caused by tumour response and organ changes. Different from EBRT where set-up uncertainties are compensated by adding a margin to the CTV, no margins to the lateral and anterior-posterior directions can be used for IGABT., Discussion: By 3D treatment planning for IGABT significant improvement of the DVH parameters is achieved compared to 2D library plans. In small tumours the benefit is primarily obtained by a decrease of dose to nearby OAR while in large tumours the use of supplementary interstitial techniques and optimization may double the target volume that can be treated at a therapeutic dose level. The clinical impact of IGABT could recently be demonstrated by the establishment of some correlations between target- and organ-related DVH parameters versus disease control and side effects, which need further clarification. Overall, a very high local control rate can be achieved with minor treatment related morbidity. This favourable therapeutic ratio seems to be now reproducible under different conditions at various treatment centres. These results have to be validated within the upcoming multi-centre prospective IntErnational study on MRI-guided brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE).