Search

Background: Dissecting trends and contributing risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients treated for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) may allow for a better patient selection for existing and emerging treatment options., Methods: The German nationwide inpatient sample was screened for patients admitted due to PE 2005-2020. Hospitalizations were stratified for the occurrence of ICH; risk factors for ICH and temporal trends were investigated., Results: Overall, 816,653 hospitalizations due to acute PE in the period 2005-2020 were analyzed in the study. ICH was reported in 2516 (0.3 %) hospitalizations, and time trend analysis revealed a fluctuating but overall, largely unchanged annual incidence. There was an increase of ICH with age. Patients with ICH had a higher comorbidity burden (Charlson-Comorbidity-Index [CCI], 5.0 [4.0-7.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0-5.0]; P < 0.001), and higher CCI was associated with an OR of 1.26 (95%CI 1.24-1.27) for ICH. Further independent risk factors for ICH were age ≥ 70 years (OR 1.23 [1.12-1.34]), severe (versus low-risk) PE (OR 3.09 [2.84-3.35]), surgery (OR 1.59 [1.47-1.72]), acute kidney injury (OR 3.60 [3.09-4.18]), and ischemic stroke (OR 14.64 [12.61-17.00]). The identified risk factors for ICH varied among different reperfusion treatment groups. As expected, ICH had a substantial impact on case-fatality of PE (OR 6.16 [5.64-6.72]; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Incidence of ICH in patients hospitalized for acute PE in Germany was overall low and depended on the patients' comorbidity burden. Identifying patients at risk for ICH allows tailored patient selection for the different reperfusion treatments and might prevent ICH., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest KCC, KM, TU, MJ, LV, ITF, TM, KK report no conflicts of interests. PL has received institutional fees and research grants from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and ReCor, honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Medical, Innoventric, ReCor and Boehringer Ingelheim and has stock options with Innoventric. SK reports institutional grants and personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; institutional grants from Inari Medical; and personal lecture/advisory fees from MSD and Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer. LH received lecture/consultant fees from MSD and Actelion, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate the contemporary use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in conjunction with reperfusion strategies in high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE)., Design: Observational epidemiological analysis., Setting: The U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) (years 2016-2020)., Patients: High-risk PE hospitalizations., Measurements and Main Results: Use of ECMO in conjunction with thrombolysis-based reperfusion (systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed thrombolysis) or mechanical reperfusion (surgical embolectomy or catheter-based thrombectomy) with regards to in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. We identified high-risk PE hospitalizations in the NIS (years 2016-2020) and investigated the use of ECMO in conjunction with thrombolysis-based (systemic thrombolysis or catheter-directed thrombolysis) and mechanical (surgical embolectomy or catheter-based thrombectomy) reperfusion strategies with regards to in-hospital mortality and major bleeding. Among 122,735 hospitalizations for high-risk PE, ECMO was used in 2,805 (2.3%); stand-alone in 1.4%, thrombolysis-based reperfusion in 0.4%, and mechanical reperfusion in 0.5%. Compared with neither reperfusion nor ECMO, ECMO plus thrombolysis-based reperfusion was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.98), whereas no difference was found with ECMO plus mechanical reperfusion (aOR 1.03; 95% CI, 0.67-1.60), and ECMO stand-alone was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.22-2.10). In the cardiac arrest subgroup, ECMO was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.93). Among all patients on ECMO, thrombolysis-based reperfusion was significantly associated (aOR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.91), and mechanical reperfusion showed a trend (aOR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47-1.19) toward reduced in-hospital mortality compared with no reperfusion, without increases in major bleeding., Conclusions: In patients with high-risk PE and refractory hemodynamic instability, ECMO may be a valuable supportive treatment in conjunction with reperfusion treatment but not as a stand-alone treatment especially for patients suffering from cardiac arrest., Competing Interests: Dr. Barco received lecture/consultant fees from Bayer HealthCare, Concept Medical, BTG Pharmaceuticals, INARI, Boston Scientific (BSC), and LeoPharma; institutional grants from Boston Scientific, Bentley, Bayer HealthCare, INARI, Medtronic, Concept Medical, Bard, and Sanofi; and economical support for travel/congress costs from Daiichi Sankyo, BTG Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer HealthCare, outside the submitted work. Dr. Giannakoulas reports lecture/consultant fees from Bayer HealthCare, Pfizer, and LeoPharma.Dr. Piazza has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Bayer, Janssen, Alexion, Amgen, and Boston Scientific Corporation, and consulting fees from Pfizer, Boston Scientific Corporation, Janssen, Prairie Education and Research Cooperative, North American Science Associates (NAMSA), and Amgen. Dr. Konstantinides reports institutional grants and personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, and BSC; institutional grants from Inari Medical; and personal lecture/advisory fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS)/Pfizer. Dr. Hobohm received lecture/consultant fees from MSD and Actelion, outside the submitted work. Dr. Piazza’s institution received funding from BMS/Pfizer, Janssen, Alexion, Bayer, Amgen, BSC, and Esperion (1R01HL164717-01); he disclosed he has an advisory role in BSC, Amgen, BCRI, Pulmonary Embolism (PERC), NAMSA, BMS, Janssen, and Regeneron. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (PH-LHD) prevalence ranges significantly across studies with limited real-world evidence., Objectives: To investigate the prevalence and prognostic influence of PH-LHD in a nationwide sample., Methods: Using the 2018 US Nationwide Inpatient Sample we calculated the prevalence of PH across heart failure (HF), cardiomyopathies, aortic, and mitral valve disease. We used logistic regression to assess the impact of PH on LHD and to find significant contributors to in-hospital mortality in the PH-LHD population., Results: Among 6,270,625 hospitalizations with LHD, 801,535 (12.8 %) had a secondary PH diagnosis. PH-LHD prevalence was 17.2 % in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), 11.8 % in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 16.8 % in dilated cardiomyopathy, 12.6 % in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 18.7 % in mitral regurgitation, 28.5 % in mitral stenosis, 13.5 % in aortic stenosis, and 13.9 % in aortic regurgitation. PH was associated with increased in-hospital mortality in HFpEF (OR 1.23; 95%CI 1.17-1.28), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (1.42; 1.06-1.89), mitral regurgitation (1.17; 1.07-1.28), and aortic stenosis (1.14; 1.04-1.26), but not in HFrEF (1.04; 0.99-1.10), or dilated cardiomyopathy (1.13; 0.99-1.29). Among PH-LHD, in-hospital mortality was associated with age, atrial fibrillation/flutter, cancer, and acute cardiac (acute right HF, myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia), or extra-cardiac (stroke, sepsis, pneumonia, acute renal failure, venous thromboembolism) diagnoses., Conclusion: In a nationwide inpatient analysis the prevalence of PH-LHD was lower than previously reported indicating reduced recognition of this disease in real world clinical practice. The diagnosis of PH-LHD was associated with worse fatality rates across all forms of LHD, except for HFrEF., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest LH received lecture/consultant fees from MSD and Actelion, outside the submitted work. SVB has served in unpaid trial activities for Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and University of Göttingen (IIT); and has served on an advisory or Speakers Bureau for Abbott Cardiovascular, Bioventrix, Boston Scientific, Cardiac Dimensions, Edwards Lifesciences, and Neochord. PL has received institutional fees and research grants from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and ReCor, honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott Medical, Innoventric, ReCor, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo and has stock options with Innoventric. SR reports grants or contracts from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, and Novartis; consulting fees from Abbott, Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, United Therapeutics, and Vifor; payment or honoraria from Actelion, Bayer, BMS, Ferrer, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, United Therapeutics, and Vifor. SVK reports institutional grants and personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; institutional grants from Inari Medical; and personal lecture/advisory fees from MSD and Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer. GG has received speaker or consulting fees from ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, Galenica, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson and MSD, outside the submitted work. The rest of the authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Studies have suggested that statins may be associated with reduced risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of the current study was to assess the evidence regarding the comparative effect of all lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in primary VTE prevention., Methods: After a systematic search of PubMed, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up until 2 November 2022, randomized controlled trials (RCT) of statins (high- or low-/moderate-intensity), ezetimibe, or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) were selected. An additive component network meta-analysis to compare VTE risk during long-term follow-up across different combinations of LLT was performed., Results: Forty-five RCTs (n = 254 933 patients) were identified, reporting a total of 2084 VTE events. Compared with placebo, the combination of PCSK9i with high-intensity statin was associated with the largest reduction in VTE risk (risk ratio [RR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.80), while there was a trend towards reduction for high-intensity (0.84; 0.70-1.02) and low-/moderate-intensity (0.89; 0.79-1.00) statin monotherapy. Ezetimibe monotherapy did not affect the VTE risk (1.04; 0.83-1.30). There was a gradual increase in the summary effect of VTE reduction with increasing intensity of the LLT. When compared with low-/moderate-intensity statin monotherapy, the combination of PCSK9i and high-intensity statin was significantly more likely to reduce VTE risk (0.66; 0.49-0.89)., Conclusions: The present meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that LLT may have a potential for VTE prevention, particularly in high-intensity dosing and in combination therapy., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition. Admission and treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is an important element in critically ill PE patients., Objectives: We aimed to identify risk factors for ICU admission and differences in patient profiles regarding risk factors and comorbidities between PE patients who had to be admitted to an ICU and those who were treated in a normal ward without ICU., Methods: We used the German nationwide inpatient sample to analyze all hospitalizations of PE patients in Germany from 2016 to 2020 stratified for ICU admission., Results: Overall, 484,859 hospitalized PE patients were treated in German hospitals from 2016 to 2020. Among these, 92,313 (19.0%) were admitted to ICU. Patients treated in ICU were younger (69.0 [IQR, 58.0-78.0] vs 72.0 [IQR, 60.0-80.0] years; P  < .001) and had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. In-hospital case fatality rate was elevated in PE patients treated in ICU (22.7% vs 10.7%; P  < .001), and ICU admission was independently associated with increased in-hospital case fatality (odds ratio [OR], 2.54; 95% CI, 2.49-2.59; P  < .001). Independent risk factors for ICU admission comprised PE with imminent or present decompensation (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 3.25-3.35; P  < .001), hemodynamic instability (OR, 4.49; 95% CI, 4.39-4.59; P  < .001), arterial hypertension (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.18-1.22; P  < .001), diabetes mellitus (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.14-1.18; P  < .001), obesity (OR, 1.300; 95% CI, 1.27-1.33; P  < .001), surgery (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.50-2.59; P  < .001), stroke (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 2.76-2.96; P  < .001), pregnancy (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.21-1.74; P  < .001), heart failure (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.71-1.77; P  < .001), atrial fibrillation/flutter (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.66-1.73; P  < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.18-1.24; P  < .001), and renal failure (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.88-1.95; P  < .001)., Conclusion: ICU treatment is an important element in the treatment of PE patients. Besides hemodynamic compromise, cardiovascular risk factors, stroke, pregnancy, and cardiopulmonary as well as renal comorbidities were independent predictors of ICU admission. Necessity of ICU admission was afflicted by increased case fatality., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: A large prospective multicenter cohort study with systematic follow-up recently reported a 2.3% 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) after acute pulmonary embolism (PE)., Objectives: The present investigation aimed to determine the reported prevalence and incidence of CTEPH diagnosis after acute PE in real-world practice over a 12-year period., Methods: This study was based on nationwide ambulatory billing claims and drug prescription data of all residents with public health insurance in Germany from 2010 to 2021., Results: A total of 573 972 patients with acute PE (median age, 71 years; 57.4% women) were identified between 2010 and 2021. Prevalence of CTEPH among patients with history of PE increased during the period from 0.4% in 2010 to 0.9% in 2021. CTEPH was diagnosed in 2556 patients after acute PE, with most (17.6%) diagnoses reported within the first 3 months after the index PE event. The cumulative incidence rate after 3 months (first quarter) was calculated at 0.08% and after the first 2 years (eighth quarter) at 0.36%; it was 0.75% over the entire (90-month) follow-up period. Patients with CTEPH diagnosis during follow-up more often had right ventricular dysfunction at the index acute PE (14.9% vs 8.3%; P < .001)., Conclusion: The low CTEPH incidence rate after acute PE in the present analysis suggests low awareness of CTEPH. It further suggests a lack of systematic follow-up protocols for acute PE survivors in the real world. Improved implementation of existing recommendations on follow-up strategies after PE is warranted., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests L.H. received lecture/consultant fees from Johnson & Johnson, Inari Medical, MSD, and Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. L.M.P. reports no conflict of interest. I.F. declares no conflict of interest. S.B. received lecture/consultant fees from Bayer HealthCare, Concept Medical, BTG Pharmaceuticals, INARI, Boston Scientific, and LeoPharma; institutional grants from Boston Scientific, Bentley, Bayer HealthCare, INARI, Medtronic, Concept Medical, Bard, and Sanofi; and economic support for travel/congress costs from Daiichi Sankyo, BTG Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer HealthCare, outside the submitted work. S.P. reports no conflict of interest. T.M. reports no conflict of interest. S.K. reports institutional grants and personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; institutional grants from Inari Medical; and personal lecture/advisory fees from MSD and Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer. K.K. reports no conflict of interest. M.B. reports no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain common and potentially lethal disease entities. AP might be an important trigger of systemic inflammtion and may activate the coagulation system with increased VTE risk., Methods: The German nationwide inpatient sample was screened for patients admitted due to AP (ICD-code K85) 2005-2019. AP hospitalizations were stratified for VTE as well as risk-factors and the impact of VTE on in-hospital case-fatality rate were investigated., Results: Overall, 797,364 hospitalizations of patients due to AP (aged in median 56.0 [IQR 44.0-71.0] years), 39.2 % females) were detected in Germany 2005-2019. Incidence of VTE in hospitalized AP patients was 1764.8 per 100,000 hospitalizations (1.8 %) with highest VTE rate between 5th and 6th decade. Cancer (OR 1.656 [95 %CI 1.513-1.812], P < 0.001), any surgery (OR 4.063 [95 %CI 3.854-4.284], P < 0.001), and heart failure (OR 1.723 [95 %CI 1.619-1.833], P < 0.001) were independently associated with VTE occurrence. Case-fatality (8.8 % vs. 2.7 %, P < 0.001) was more than 3-fold higher in AP patients with than without VTE. VTE was associated with increased case-fatality in AP patients (OR 3.925 [95 %CI 3.684-4.181], P < 0.001)., Conclusions: VTE is a life-threatening event in hospitalized AP patients associated with an almost 4-fold increased case-fatality rate. Cancer, any surgery, thrombophilia and heart failure were important risk factors for occurrence of VTE in AP., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest KK, VS, ITF, VHS, MAO, TM report no conflict of interests. TM is PI of the DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany. CEK reports having from Amarin Germany, Amgen GmbH, Bayer Vital, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Leo Pharma, MSD Sharp & Dohme, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis GmbH. SK reports institutional grants and personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; institutional grants from Inari Medical; and personal lecture/advisory fees from MSD and Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer. TM reports no conflict of interests. LH received lecture/consultant fees from MSD, Boston Scientific, Johnson&Johnson and Inari Medical, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: Patients surviving acute pulmonary embolism (PE) necessitate long-term treatment and follow-up. However, the chronic economic impact of PE on European healthcare systems remains to be determined., Methods and Results: We calculated the direct cost of illness during the first year after discharge for the index PE, analyzing data from a multicentre prospective cohort study in Germany. Main and accompanying readmission diagnoses were used to calculate DRG-based hospital reimbursements; anticoagulation costs were estimated from the exact treatment duration and each drug's unique national identifier; and outpatient post-PE care costs from guidelines-recommended algorithms and national reimbursement catalogues. Of 1017 patients enrolled at 17 centres, 958 (94%) completed ≥ 3-month follow-up; of those, 24% were rehospitalized (0.34 [95% CI 0.30-0.39] readmissions per PE survivor). Age, coronary artery, pulmonary and kidney disease, diabetes, and (in the sensitivity analysis of 837 patients with complete 12-month follow-up) cancer, but not recurrent PE, were independent cost predictors by hurdle gamma regression accounting for zero readmissions. Estimated rehospitalization cost was €1138 (95% CI 896-1420) per patient. Anticoagulation duration was 329 (IQR 142-365) days, with estimated average per-patient costs of €1050 (median 972; IQR 458-1197); costs of scheduled ambulatory follow-up visits amounted to €181. Total estimated direct per-patient costs during the first year after PE ranged from €2369 (primary analysis) to €2542 (sensitivity analysis)., Conclusions: By estimating per-patient costs and identifying cost drivers of post-PE care, our study may inform decisions concerning implementation and reimbursement of follow-up programmes aiming at improved cardiovascular prevention. (Trial registration number: DRKS00005939)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Rhythm control, either with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation, and rate control strategies are the cornerstones of atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Despite the increasing role of rhythm control over the past few years, it remains inconclusive which strategy is superior in improving clinical outcomes., Objectives: This study summarizes the total and time-varying evidence regarding the efficacy of rhythm- vs rate-control strategies in the management of AF., Methods: We systematically perused the MEDLINE, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials from inception to November 2023. We included studies that compared the efficacy of rhythm control (ie, antiarrhythmic drugs classes Ia, Ic, or III, AF catheter ablation, and electrical cardioversion) and rate control (ie, beta-blocker, digitalis, or calcium antagonist) strategies among patients with nonvalvular AF. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, whereas secondary outcomes included all-cause death, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), sinus rhythm at the end of the follow-up, and rhythm control-related adverse events. A cumulative meta-analysis to assess temporal trends and a meta-regression analysis using the percentage of ablation use was performed., Results: We identified 18 studies with a total of 17,536 patients (mean age: 68.6 ± 9.7 years, 37.9% females) and a mean follow-up of 28.5 months. Of those, 31.9% had paroxysmal AF. A rhythm control strategy reduced CV death (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62-0.96), stroke (HR: 0.801; 95% CI: 0.643-0.998), and hospitalization for HF (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.69-0.94) but not all-cause death (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.73-1.02) compared with a rate control strategy. This benefit was driven by contemporary studies, whereas more ablation use within the rhythm control arm was associated with improved outcomes, except stroke., Conclusions: In patients with AF, a contemporary rhythm control strategy leads to reduced CV mortality, HF events, and stroke compared with a rate control strategy., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Saguner has received educational grants through his institution from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, BMS/Pfizer, and Medtronic; and speaker/advisory board/consulting fees from Bayer Healthcare, Biotronik, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Stride Bio Inc, and Zoll; and has stock options from Gilead Sciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Catheter-directed treatment (CDT) of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is entering a growth phase in Europe following a steady increase in the USA in the past decade, but the potential economic impact on European healthcare systems remains unknown., Methods and Results: We built two statistical models for the monthly trend of proportion of CDT among patients with severe (intermediate- or high-risk) PE in the USA. The conservative model was based on admission data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016-20 and the model reflecting increasing access to advanced treatment from the PERT™ national quality assurance database registry 2018-21. By applying these models to the forecast of annual PE-related hospitalizations in Germany, we calculated the annual number of severe PE cases and the expected increase in CDT use for the period 2025-30. The NIS-based model yielded a slow increase, reaching 3.1% (95% confidence interval 3.0-3.2%) among all hospitalizations with PE in 2030; in the PERT-based model, increase would be steeper, reaching 8.7% (8.3-9.2%). Based on current reimbursement rates, we estimated an increase of annual costs for PE-related hospitalizations in Germany ranging from 15.3 to 49.8 million euros by 2030. This calculation does not account for potential cost savings, including those from reduced length of hospital stay., Conclusion: Our approach and results, which may be adapted to other European healthcare systems, provide a benchmark for healthcare costs expected to result from CDT. Data from ongoing trials on clinical benefits and cost savings are needed to determine cost-effectiveness and inform reimbursement decisions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: K.M, Kl.K., Ka.K., H.B., T.N., C.A., I.T.F., T.M.T., K.C., M.L., J.R., and L.V.: no disclosures; B.K.: AngioDynamics, Penumbra, Viz.ai, and Dexcom (consultant); R.P.R.: BMS and Janssen (institutional research support); Abbott, Dova, Inari, Janssen, and Penumbra (advisory/consultant); STORM-PE National Lead Investigator, Penumbra; The PERT Consortium™ President; J.M.M.: AngioDynamics, Penumbra, Argon Medical, Pavmed, Auxetics, Innova Vascular, Inquis Medical, Retriever Medical, and Boston Scientific (consultant); K.R.: Abbott Vascular, AngioDynamics, Auxetics, Becton Dickinson, Boston Scientific, Contego, Imperative Care/TRUVIC, Johnson and Johnson Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Neptune Medical, Philips, SurModics, and Terumo (consultant/advisory board); Access Vascular, Aerami, Althea Medical, Auxetics, Contego, Endospan, Imperative Care/TRUVIC, Innova Vascular, InspireMD, JanaCare, Magneto, MedAlliance, Neptune Medical, Orchestra, ProSomnus, Sealonix, Shockwave, Skydance, Summa Therapeutics, Thrombolex, Valcare, Vantis Vascular, Vasorum, and VuMedi (equity or stock options); NIH, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Novo Nordisk, Penumbra, and Gettinge-Atrium (research grants via institution); The National PERT Consortium™, Board of Directors; S.B. Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Bayer, and Sanofi (institutional research support by Board); Boston Scientific, Penumbra, and Viatris (personal fees/honoraria); R.N.C.: Penumbra, Steering Committee; J.S.G.: advisor and research fees to the institution from Boston Scientific and Inari Medical; equity in Endovascular Engineering; R.A.L.: Boston Scientific and Medtronic (advisory board); Penumbra, Abbott Vascular, Neptune Medical, Bard Vascular, Cordis, Biosense Webster, Becton Dickinson, SurModics, and Abbott Vascular (speakers bureau); Philips Healthcare, Spectranetics, Terumo, Boston Scientific, Inari, Penumbra, Ethicon, Vesper, and Black Swan (research support); Imperative Vascular, Summa Vascular, Innova Vascular, and Thrombolex (equity shareholder); L.H.: MSD and Janssen (personal lecture/consultant fees); S.V.K.: Bayer AG, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, LumiraDx, and Penumbra (personal lecture/advisory fees and research grants to institution); MSD, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb (personal lecture/advisory fees); E.A.S.: NIH/NHLBI K23HL150290, Food & Drug Administration, and SCAI (funding); Abbott, BD, Boston Scientific, Cook, Medtronic, and Philips (grants to institution); Abbott, BD, Boston Scientific, Cagent, Conavi, Cook, Cordis, InfraRedx, Medtronic, Philips, Recor, Shockwave, and VentureMed (speaking/consulting)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a critical medical condition requiring prompt and accurate management. The introduction and growing significance of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERT), also termed EXPERT-PE teams, signify a paradigm shift toward a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach in managing this complex entity. As the understanding of acute PE continues to evolve, PERTs stand as a linkage of optimized care, offering personalized and evidence-based management strategies for patients afflicted by this life-threatening condition. The evolving role of PERTs globally is evident in their increasing integration into the standard care pathways for acute PE. These teams have demonstrated benefits such as reducing time to diagnosis and treatment initiation, optimizing resource utilization, and improving patient outcomes., Competing Interests: L.H. received lecture/consultant fees from MSD, INARI, Johnson & Johnson, and Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. L.H. also reports personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Johnson & Johnson, personal fees from INARI, and personal fees from Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. I.T.F. reports no conflict of interest. D.D. received speaker's honoraria from Boston Scientific, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS, and Pfizer. D.D. also reports grants from DFG, grants from DZHK, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from BMS, and personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. K.K. reports no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Context: Next to a large body of epidemiological observational studies showing that the Mediterranean diet (MD) is an important lifestyle determinant of cardiovascular risk, there is less relevant evidence from well-conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with hard cardiovascular outcomes., Objective: The objective of the study was to identify the most effective dietary intervention for reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality., Data Sources: A systematic approach following PRISMA network meta-analyses reporting guidelines was applied to a search of electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase) without language restrictions, supplemented by scanning through bibliographies of studies and meetings' abstract material. Inclusion criteria were RCTs conducted in an adult population, investigating the effects of different type of diets or dietary patterns on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes of interest., Data Extraction: Data extraction for each study was conducted by 2 independent reviewers., Data Analysis: A frequentist network meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted. Death from any cardiovascular cause was defined as the primary outcome. A total of 17 trials incorporating 83 280 participants were included in the systematic review. Twelve articles (n = 80 550 participants) contributed to the network meta-analysis for the primary outcome. When compared with the control diet, only the MD showed a reduction in cardiovascular deaths (risk ratio = 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.82). Additionally, MD was the sole dietary strategy that decreased the risk of major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, angina, and all-cause mortality., Conclusions: MD may play a protective role against cardiovascular disease and death for primary and also secondary prevention., Systematic Review Registration: Center for Open Science, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5KX83., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute.)

Background and Aims: The socio-economic burden imposed by acute pulmonary embolism (PE) on European healthcare systems is largely unknown. We sought to determine temporal trends and identify cost drivers of hospitalisation for PE in Germany., Methods and Results: We analysed the totality of reimbursed hospitalisation costs in Germany (G-DRG system) in the years 2016-2020. Overall, 484 884 PE hospitalisations were coded in this period. Direct hospital costs amounted to a median of 3572 (IQR, 2804 to 5869) euros, resulting in average total reimbursements of 710 million euros annually. Age, PE severity, comorbidities and in-hospital (particularly bleeding) complications were identified by multivariable logistic regression as significant cost drivers. Use of catheter-directed therapy (CDT) constantly increased (annual change in the absolute proportion of hospitalisations with CDT + 0.40% [95% CI + 0.32% to + 0.47%]; P < 0.001), and it more than doubled in the group of patients with severe PE (28% of the entire population) over time. Although CDT use was overall associated with increased hospitalisation costs, this association was no longer present (adjusted OR 1.02 [0.80-1.31]) in patients with severe PE and shock; this was related, at least in part, to a reduction in the median length of hospital stay (for 14.0 to 8.0 days)., Conclusions: We identified current and emerging cost drivers of hospitalisation for PE, focusing on severe disease and intermediate/high risk of an adverse early outcome. The present study may inform reimbursement decisions by policymakers and help to guide future health economic analysis of advanced treatment options for patients with PE., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Over the last few years, the concept of multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) has emerged to encounter the increasing variety and complexity in managing acute pulmonary embolism (PE)., Purpose: To investigate PERT's composition and added clinical value in a university center in Germany., Methods: Over 4 years (01/2019-11/2022), patients with confirmed PE were enrolled in a prospective single-center cohort study (PERT Mainz). We investigated the composition of PERT and compared, after propensity score matching, patients with acute PE before and after the initiation of PERT at our Medical University Centre. The primary outcome was in-hospital PE-related mortality., Results: From 2019 to 2022, 88 patients with acute PE with a PERT decision were registered. Of those, 13 (14.8%) patients died during the in-hospital stay. Patients evaluated by a PERT had a median age of 68; 48.9% were females, and 21.7% suffered from malignancy. Right ventricular dysfunction was present in 76.1% of all patients. In total, 42.0% were classified as intermediate-high-risk PE and 11.4% as high-risk PE. First PERT contact mainly originated from emergency departments (33.3%) and intensive care units (30.0%), followed by chest pain units (21.3%) and regular wards (12.0%). The participation rate of medical specialties demonstrated that cardiologists (100%) or cardiac/vascular surgeons (98.6%) were included in almost all PERT consultations, followed by radiologists (95.9%) and anesthesiologists (87.8%). Compared to the PERT era, more patients in the pre-PERT era were classified as simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) ≥ 1 (78.4% vs 71.6%) and as high-risk PE according to ESC 2019 guidelines (18.2% vs. 11.4%). In the pre-PERT era, low- and intermediate-low patients with PE received more frequently advanced reperfusion therapies such as systemic thrombolysis or surgical embolectomy compared to the PERT era (10.7% vs. 2.5%). Patients in the pre-PERT were found to have a considerably higher all-cause mortality and PE-related mortality rate (31.8% vs. 14.8%) compared to patients in the PERT era (22.7% vs. 13.6%). After propensity matching (1:1) by including parameters as age, sex, sPESI, and ESC risk classes, univariate regression analyses demonstrated that the PE management based on a PERT decision was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.37 [95%CI 0.18-0.77]; p = 0.009). For PE-related mortality, a tendency for reduction was observed (OR, 0.54 [95%CI 0.24-1.18]; p = 0.121)., Conclusion: PERT implementation was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality rate in patients with acute PE. Large prospective studies are needed further to explore the impact of PERTs on clinical outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Medical treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection (HFpEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has weaker evidence compared with reduced ejection fraction, despite recent trials with an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is)., Objectives: The authors aimed to estimate the aggregate therapeutic benefit of drugs for HFmrEF and HFpEF., Methods: The authors performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized trials including patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%, treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (analyzed together as renin-angiotensin system inhibitors [RASi]), beta-blockers (BBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), digoxin, ARNI, and SGLT2i. An additive component network meta-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and first hospitalization for heart failure (HHF); secondary outcomes were CV death, total HHF, and all-cause mortality., Results: The authors identified 13 studies with a total of 29,875 patients and a mean LVEF of 56.3% ± 8.7%. ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i separately, but not RASi, BB, or digoxin, reduced the primary composite outcome compared with placebo. The combination of ARNI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i was the most effective (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.31-0.70]); this was largely explained by the triple combination of ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i (HR: 0.56 [95% CI 0.43-0.71]). Results were similar for CV death (HR: 0.63 [95% CI 0.43-0.91] for ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i) or total HHF (HR: 0.49 [95% CI 0.33-0.71] for ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i) alone. In a subgroup analysis, only SGLT2i had a consistent benefit among all LVEF subgroups, whereas the triple combination had the greatest benefit in HFmrEF, robust benefit in patients with LVEF 50% to 59%, and a statistically marginal benefit in patients with LVEF ≥60%., Conclusions: In patients with HF and LVEF>40%, the quadruple combination of ARNI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i provides the largest reduction in the risk of CV death and HHF; driven by the robust effect of the triple combination of ARNI, MRA, and SGLT2i. The benefit was more pronounced in HFmrEF patients., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Konstantinides is a consultant to Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer AG, Boston Scientific, Penumbra Inc, and LumiraDx; and he has received honoraria for lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb–Pfizer, Boston Scientific, and MSD. Dr Giamouzis has received honoraria for lectures and/or advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, Genesis Pharma, Menarini Hellas, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Servier. Dr Cooper is research consultant for Abiomed. Dr Butler is a consultant to Abbott, Adrenomed, American Regent, Arca Biopharma, Amgen, Applied Therapeutic, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimension, Cardior CVRx, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Element Science, Fast Biomedical, G3 Pharmaceutical, Innolife, Impulse Dynamics, Imbria, Inventiva, Lexicon, Lilly, LivaNova Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Occlutech, Nestle, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Pharmain, Roche, Sanofi, Sequana, SQ Innovation, 3live, Velakor, and Vifor. Dr Giannakoulas has received honoraria for lectures and/or advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Servier, Roche, Pfizer, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, and Genesis Pharma. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In Fontan circulation, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies could improve the patients' exercise capacity. This study aimed to investigate the effects of PAH agents on different exercise parameters in stable Fontan patients by synthesising evidence of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)., Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science databases, as well as of ClinicalTrials.gov, was performed. Primary outcomes were specific cardiopulmonary exercise test parameters: peak oxygen uptake (peak VO 2 ), peak heart rate (peak HR), the minute ventilation/produced carbon dioxide (VE/VCO 2 ) slope and the oxygen uptake, both measured at the anaerobic threshold (VO 2 @AT)., Results: Five RCTs were included in the analysis including 573 Fontan patients (mean age 21.2 years, 60% male). PAH-targeted therapies did not affect peak VO 2 (mean difference (MD) 0.72, 95% CI -0.25 to 1.70) or peak HR (MD -0.67, 95% CI -3.81 to 2.47), but resulted in a small, significant improvement in VO 2 @AT (standardised MD 0.24, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.47). VE/VCO 2 slope at the anaerobic threshold was also reduced (MD -1.13, 95% CI -2.25 to -0.01)., Conclusions: Although PAH-targeted therapies did not affect exercise parameters at maximal effort, they induced slight improvements in indices of submaximal effort, measured at the anaerobic threshold. Pharmacological improvement of submaximal exercise seems to be a more suitable indicator of Fontan individuals' exercise capacity. Larger RCTs, recruiting specific subpopulations and focusing also on the anaerobic threshold, are warranted to draw more robust conclusions., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022306674., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: This study aimed to apply different methods of diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis (DTA-NMA) for studies reporting results of five imaging tests for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE): pulmonary angiography (PA), computed tomography angiography (CTPA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), planar ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy and single-photon emission computed tomography ventilation/perfusion (SPECT V/Q)., Methods: We searched four databases (MEDLINE [via PubMed], Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Epistemonikos) from inception until June 2, 2022 to identify systematic reviews (SRs) describing diagnostic accuracy of PA, CTPA, MRA, V/Q scan and SPECT V/Q for suspected PE. Study-level data were extracted and pooled using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) meta-regression approach and two DTA-NMA models to compare accuracy estimates of different imaging tests. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool and certainty of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) framework., Results: We identified 13 SRs, synthesizing data from 33 primary studies and for four imaging tests (PA, CTPA, MRA and V/Q scan). The HSROC meta-regression model using PA as the reference standard showed that MRA had the best overall diagnostic performance with sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 1.00) and specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.99). However, DTA-NMA models indicated that V/Q scan had the highest sensitivity, while CTPA was most specific., Conclusion: Selecting a different DTA-NMA method to assess multiple diagnostic tests can affect estimates of diagnostic accuracy. There is no established method, but the choice depends on the data and familiarity with Bayesian statistics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies exert significant haemodynamic changes; however, systematic synthesis is currently lacking., Methods: We searched PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science for studies evaluating mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), cardiac index/cardiac output (CI/CO) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of PAH-targeted therapies either in monotherapy or combinations as assessed by right heart catheterisation in treatment-naïve PAH patients. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis with meta-regression., Results: We included 68 studies (90 treatment groups) with 3898 patients (age 47.4±13.2 years, 74% women). In studies with small PVR reduction (<4 WU), CI/CO increase (R 2 =62%) and not mPAP reduction (R 2 =24%) was decisive for the PVR reduction (p<0.001 and p=0.36, respectively, in the multivariable meta-regression model); however, in studies with large PVR reduction (>4 WU), both CI/CO increase (R 2 =72%) and mPAP reduction (R 2 =35%) contributed significantly to the PVR reduction (p<0.001 and p=0.01, respectively). PVR reduction as a percentage of the pre-treatment value was more pronounced in the oral+prostanoid intravenous/subcutaneous combination therapy (mean difference -50.0%, 95% CI -60.8- -39.2%), compared to oral combination therapy (-41.7%, -47.6- -35.8%), prostanoid i.v ./ s.c. monotherapy (-31.8%, -37.6- -25.9%) and oral monotherapy (-21.6%, -25.4- -17.8%). Changes in haemodynamic parameters were significantly associated with changes in functional capacity of patients with PAH as expressed by the 6-min walking distance., Conclusion: Combination therapies, especially with the inclusion of parenteral prostanoids, lead to remarkable haemodynamic improvement in treatment-naïve PAH patients and may unmask the contribution of mPAP reduction to the overall PVR reduction in addition to the increase in CO., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: The authors have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) and its sequelae impact healthcare systems globally. Low-risk PE patients can be managed with early discharge strategies leading to cost savings, but post-discharge costs are undetermined., Purpose: To define healthcare resource utilisation and overall costs during follow-up of low-risk PE., Methods: We used an incidence-based, bottom-up approach and calculated direct and indirect costs over 3-month follow-up after low-risk PE, with data from the Home Treatment of Patients with Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism (HoT-PE) cohort study., Results: Average 3-month costs per patient having suffered low-risk PE were 7029.62 €; of this amount, 4872.93 € were associated with PE, accounting to 69.3% of total costs. Specifically, direct costs totalled 3019.33 €, and of those, 862.64 € (28.6%) were associated with PE. Anticoagulation (279.00 €), rehospitalisations (296.83 €), and ambulatory visits (194.95 €) comprised the majority of the 3-month direct costs. The remaining costs amounting to 4010.29 € were indirect costs due to loss of productivity., Conclusion: In a patient cohort with acute low-risk PE followed over 3 months, the majority of costs were indirect costs related to productivity loss, whereas direct, PE-specific post-discharge costs were low. Effective interventions are needed to reduce the burden of PE and associated costs, especially those related to productivity loss., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Dissecting the determinants of functional capacity during long-term follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can help to better characterize a patient population with persisting limitation., Methods: In a prospective cohort study, consecutive unselected survivors of acute PE underwent 3- and 12-month follow-up, including six-minute walking distance (6MWD) and dyspnea assessment with the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. We used reference equations adjusting for age, sex, and anthropometric measurements to define abnormal 6MWD., Results: Overall, 323 of 363 (89.0%) patients had at least one recorded 6MWD value at one year. At 3 months, the prevalence of abnormal 6MWD was 21.9% and at 12 months it was 18.3%. At 3 and 12 months, 58.8% and 52.1% with abnormal 6MWD did not report dyspnea, respectively. On average and during follow-up, 6MWD significantly improved with time, while the mMRC dyspnea scale did not. Abnormal 6MWD was associated with younger age (odds ratio per decade, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.94), higher body mass index (1.10; 1.03-1.17), smoking (3.53; 1.34-9.31), intermediate- or high-risk PE (3.21; 1.21-8.56), and higher mMRC grading (2.28; 1.59-3.27). Abnormal 6MWD at 3 months was associated with the prospectively defined endpoint of post-PE impairment (3.72; 1.50-9.28) and with poor disease-specific and generic health-related quality of life., Conclusion: Three months after PE, 37% of patients reported dyspnea and 22% had abnormal 6MWD. After a year, 20% still had abnormal 6MWD. Dyspnea correlated with abnormal 6MWD, but over 50% of patients with abnormal 6MWD did not report dyspnea. Abnormal 6MWD predicted subsequent post-pulmonary embolism impairment and worse long-term quality of life., Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register Identifier DRKS00005939., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests I.T.F. reports no conflicts of interest. L.V. reports no conflicts of interest. S.B. reports grants or contracts from Bayer, INARI, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Bard, SANOFI, and Concept Medical; consulting fees from INARI; payment or honoraria from INARI, Boston Scientific, and Concept Medical; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Bayer and Daiichi Sankyo. K.C.C. reports no conflicts of interest. R.E. reports lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, OMT, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, United Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie, research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, OMT, Janssen-Cilag, and consulting fees from BetaPharm, OMT, Lungpacer Medical. G.G. reports personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer HealthCare, Pfizer and LeoPharma. M.H. reports honoraria for lectures and advisory board activities from Astra Zeneca, Bayer HealthCare, Berlin Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daichi Sankyo, Janssen, MSD, OMT, Pfizer, Santis. L.H. reports consulting fees from MSD and Janssen. K.K. reports no conflicts of interest. H.W. reports lecture and consulting fees from Actelion/Janssen, GSK, Bayer HealthCare, Daiichi Sanchyo, Biotest, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD and Roche. S.R. reports grants or contracts from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen, and Novartis; consulting fees from Abbott, Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, United Therapeutics, and Vifor; payment or honoraria from Actelion, Bayer, BMS, Ferrer, GSK, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, United Therapeutics, and Vifor. S.V.K. reports grants or contracts from Bayer AG; consulting fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; and payment or honoraria from Bayer AG, MSD, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) have gradually improved the disease course. This retrospective cohort study aims to explore the diagnostic hemodynamic profile and survival of PH patients and their temporal changes, as well as investigate potential prognostic factors. Overall, 257 adult patients were diagnosed with PH following right heart catheterization (RHC) from January 2008 to June 2023 according to the hemodynamic cut-off values proposed by the corresponding ESC/ERS guidelines at the time RHC was performed. Of these patients, 46.3% were Group 1, 17.8% Group 2, 14.0% Group 3, 18.0% Group 4, and 3.0% Group 5 PH. Temporal improvement in both diagnostic hemodynamic profile and survival of patients with PH and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was identified after 2013. Survival analysis demonstrated 5-year survival rates of 65% in Group 1 PH (90.3% in idiopathic PAH) and 77% in Group 4 PH. PAH patients being at low risk at diagnosis presented a similar 1-year all-cause mortality rate (12.4%) with high-risk ones (12.8%), primarily due to non-PH-related causes of death (62%), while high-risk patients died mostly due to PH (67%). The observed improvements in diagnostic hemodynamic profiles and overall survival highlight the importance of timely diagnosis and successful treatment strategies in PH.

Background: Reperfusion therapy is challenging in the elderly. Catheter-directed therapies are an alternative for higher-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients if systemic thrombolysis (ST) is contraindicated or has failed. Their safety has not been evaluated in specific vulnerable populations., Aims: We aimed to assess the safety of reperfusion therapies in elderly and frail patients in the real world., Methods: In the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020, we identified hospitalisations of patients ≥65 years with PE and defined a frailty subgroup using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator. We investigated reperfusion therapies (ST, catheter-directed thrombolysis [CDT], catheter-based thrombectomy [CBT], surgical embolectomy [SE]) and their associated safety outcomes (overall and major bleeding)., Results: Among 980,245 hospitalisations of patients ≥65 years with PE (28.0% frail), reperfusion therapies were used in 4.9% (17.6% among high-risk PE). ST utilisation remained stable, while the use of catheter-directed therapies increased from 1.7% in 2016 to 3.2% in 2020. Among all hospitalisations with reperfusion, CDT, compared to ST, was associated with reduced major bleeding (5.8% vs 12.2%, odds ratio [OR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.70); these results also applied to frail patients. CBT, compared to SE, was also associated with reduced major bleeding (11.0% vs 22.4%, OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.91), but not among frail patients. These differences were particularly significant in patients with non-high-risk PE. Differences persisted for overall bleeding as well., Conclusions: Catheter-directed therapies may be a safer alternative to classical reperfusion therapies for elderly and frail patients with PE requiring reperfusion treatment.

Objective: Despite the establishment of transcatheter closure as the treatment of choice in adults with secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs), the effectiveness of this approach in the elderly is disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of transcatheter ASD closure in patients ≥60 years old., Methods: We systematically searched four major electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Scopus and Web of Science), ClinicalTrials.gov, article references and grey literature. Primary outcomes were the right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) and the New York Heart Association functional class change, whereas secondary outcomes included systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) change, as well as the rate of atrial arrhythmias and all-cause mortality., Results: In total, 18 single-arm cohorts comprising 1184 patients were included. RVEDD was reduced after ASD closure (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.9, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.7). Elderly patients had 9.5 times higher odds of being asymptomatic after ASD closure (95% CI 5.06 to 17.79). Furthermore, ASD closure improved sPAP (mean difference (MD) -10.8, 95% CI -14.6 to -7), LVEDD (SMD 0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.0), TR severity (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.60) and BNP (MD -68.3, 95% CI -114.4 to -22.1). There was a neutral effect of ASD closure on atrial arrhythmias., Conclusions: Transcatheter ASD closure is beneficial for the elderly population since it improves functional capacity, biventricular dimensions, pulmonary pressures, TR severity and BNP. However, the incidence of atrial arrhythmias did not change significantly after the intervention., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022378574., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Over the last years, multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) have emerged to encounter the increasing variety and complexity in the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). We aimed to systematically investigate the composition and added clinical value of PERTs., Methods: We searched PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science until January 2022 for articles designed to describe the structure and function of PERTs. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of controlled studies (PERT vs. pre-PERT era) to investigate the impact of PERTs on clinical outcomes and advanced therapies use., Results: We included 22 original studies and four surveys. Overall, 31.5% of patients with PE were evaluated by PERT referred mostly by emergency departments (59.4%). In 11 single-arm studies (1532 intermediate-risk and high-risk patients evaluated by PERT) mortality rate was 10%, bleeding rate 9% and length of stay 7.3 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-8.9]. In nine controlled studies there was no difference in mortality [risk ratio (RR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.67-1.19] by comparing pre-PERT with PERT era. When analysing patients with intermediate or high-risk class only, the effect estimate for mortality tended to be lower for patients treated in the PERT era compared to those treated in the pre-PERT era (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.45-1.12). The use of advanced therapies was higher (RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.29-5.50) and the in-hospital stay shorter (mean difference - 1.6 days) in PERT era compared to pre-PERT era., Conclusions: PERT implementation led to greater use of advanced therapies and shorter in-hospital stay. Our meta-analysis did not show a survival benefit in patients with PE since PERT implementation. Large prospective studies are needed to further explore the impact of PERTs on clinical outcomes., Registration: Open Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/SBFK9., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in patients with underlying malignancy. Patients with cancer have a higher risk of bleeding, and at the same time, carry an elevated risk of thromboembolism related to the hypercoagulable state, type of cancer, and anticancer treatment, rendering safe anticoagulation challenging in this population. Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative treatment option in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, the data on patients with cancer are limited. Our study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes in patients with cancer receiving left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device. This is a prospective, single-center study comparing outcomes in 389 patients who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the WATCHMAN device over 5 years in a single, large academic hospital in the United States. The postprocedural outcomes of mortality, stroke, and major bleeding were evaluated in patients with and without cancer. Our study included 57 patients with cancer and 332 without cancer. The baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Metastatic disease was present in 16.4% of patients, and 25% were receiving active treatment at the time of the procedure. The median follow-up time was 354 (interquartile range 85 to 790) days. There was no difference in mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 2.35, p = 0.38), major bleeding episodes (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.33, p = 0.68), and stroke (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.19 to 2.21, p = 0.49) at 3 years after the procedure in patients with and without cancer. There was no difference in the composite outcome (postprocedural mortality, stroke, and major bleeding) between the 2 groups (HR 1.25, CI 0.75 to 2.07, p = 0.38). Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in patients with cancer appears to be safe and has a similar long-term risk compared with patients without cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Filby is a consultant for Boston Scientific. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) may provide prognostically valuable information during follow-up after pulmonary embolism (PE). Our objective was to investigate the association of patterns and degree of exercise limitation, as assessed by CPET, with clinical, echocardiographic and laboratory abnormalities and quality of life (QoL) after PE., Methods: In a prospective cohort study of unselected consecutive all-comers with PE, survivors of the index acute event underwent 3- and 12-month follow-ups, including CPET. We defined cardiopulmonary limitation as ventilatory inefficiency or insufficient cardiocirculatory reserve. Deconditioning was defined as peak O 2 uptake ( V ' O 2 ) <80% with no other abnormality., Results: Overall, 396 patients were included. At 3 months, prevalence of cardiopulmonary limitation and deconditioning was 50.1% (34.7% mild/moderate; 15.4% severe) and 12.1%, respectively; at 12 months, it was 44.8% (29.1% mild/moderate; 15.7% severe) and 14.9%, respectively. Cardiopulmonary limitation and its severity were associated with age (OR per decade 2.05, 95% CI 1.65-2.55), history of chronic lung disease (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.06-6.97), smoking (OR 5.87, 95% CI 2.44-14.15) and intermediate- or high-risk acute PE (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.92-9.94). Severe cardiopulmonary limitation at 3 months was associated with the prospectively defined, combined clinical-haemodynamic end-point of "post-PE impairment" (OR 6.40, 95% CI 2.35-18.45) and with poor disease-specific and generic health-related QoL., Conclusions: Abnormal exercise capacity of cardiopulmonary origin is frequent after PE, being associated with clinical and haemodynamic impairment as well as long-term QoL reduction. CPET can be considered for selected patients with persisting symptoms after acute PE to identify candidates for closer follow-up and possible therapeutic interventions., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: S. Barco reports grants or contracts from Bayer, INARI, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Bard, Sanofi and Concept Medical, consulting fees from INARI, payment or honoraria from INARI, Boston Scientific and Concept Medical, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Bayer and Daiichi Sankyo. R. Ewert reports lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, OMT, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, United Therapeutics, AstraZeneca and Berlin-Chemie, research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, OMT and Janssen-Cilag, and consulting fees from BetaPharm, OMT and Lungpacer Medical. G. Giannakoulas reports personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer HealthCare, Pfizer and LeoPharma. L. Hobohm reports consulting fees and lecture honoraria from MSD and Janssen. S. Rosenkranz reports grants or contracts from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen and Novartis, consulting fees from Abbott, Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, United Therapeutics and Vifor, and payment or honoraria from Actelion, Bayer, BMS, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, United Therapeutics and Vifor. T.A. Morris reports research funding from INARI. S.V. Konstantinides reports grants or contracts from Bayer AG, consulting fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo and Boston Scientific, and payment or honoraria from Bayer AG, INARI Medical, MSD, Pfizer and BMS. M. Held reports honoraria for lectures and advisory board activities from AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare, Berlin-Chemie, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daichi Sankyo, Janssen, MSD, OMT, Pfizer and Santis. D. Dumitrescu reports honoraria for lectures or consulting fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, OMT, Pfizer, Servier and Vifor. The remaining authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) are considered as two separate disease-entities. In recent years, studies have reported clear associations between VTE and atherosclerosis. We aimed to evaluate the long-term risk of ATE in VTE patients in comparison to controls without VTE., Methods: Nationwide outpatient claims data of all inhabitants with statutory health insurance in Germany were used for secondary data analysis between the years 2011 and 2020. Patients treated in 2013 were stratified by VTE event, and groups were 1:2-matched by age and sex. The hazard for an ATE event in a 5-year follow-up period between patients with and without VTE was calculated with multivariable Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, and comorbidities., Results: Of 69,699,277 individuals treated in the year 2013 by German physicians in outpatient care, in total 686,382 individuals (age 59.8 ± 17.5 years, 65.4 % females) were included comprising 228,794 patients with VTE and 457,588 controls without VTE. VTE patients more often had cardiovascular risk factors (81.6 % vs. 62.2 %) and traditional VTE risk factors. The occurrence of ATE events during follow-up was 1.8 %-points higher in VTE patients in comparison to the controls (9.7 % vs. 7.9 %). VTE events were independently associated with increased occurrence of ATE events within follow-up (HR adjusted 1.19 [99%CI 1.16-1.23], p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Patients with a VTE event have an increased long-term risk for subsequent arterial cardiovascular events. Large prospective cohorts are needed to identify patient subgroups with a very high ATE risk after VTE., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Karsten Keller reports no conflict of interests. Claudia Kohring reports no conflict of interests. Ioannis T. Farmakis reports no conflict of interests. Luca Valerio reports no conflict of interests. Stefano Barco received lecture/consultant fees from Bayer HealthCare, Concept Medical, BTG Pharmaceuticals, INARI, Boston Scientific, and LeoPharma; institutional grants from Boston Scientific, Bentley, Bayer HealthCare, INARI, Medtronic, Concept Medical, Bard, and Sanofi; and economical support for travel/congress costs from Daiichi Sankyo, BTG Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer HealthCare, outside the submitted work. Jörg Bätzing reports no conflict of interests. Manas K. Akmatov reports no conflict of interests. Stavros Konstantinides reports institutional grants and personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; institutional grants from Inari Medical; and personal lecture/advisory fees from MSD and Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer. Thomas Münzel reports no conflict of interests. TM is PI of the DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany. Lukas Hobohm received lecture/consultant fees from MSD and Actelion, outside the submitted work. Jakob Holstiege reports no conflict of interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of social determinants in the treatment and course of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is understudied., Objective: To investigate the association between social determinants of health with in-hospital management and early clinical outcomes following acute PE., Methods: We identified hospitalizations of adults with acute PE discharge diagnosis from the nationwide inpatient sample (2016-2018). Multivariable regression was used to investigate the association between race/ethnicity, type of expected primary payer, and income with the use of advanced PE therapies (thrombolysis, catheter-directed treatment, surgical embolectomy, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), length of stay, hospitalization charges, and in-hospital death., Results: A total of 1,124,204 hospitalizations with a PE diagnosis were estimated from the 2016-2018 nationwide inpatient sample, corresponding to a hospitalization rate of 14.9/10,000 adult persons-year. The use of advanced therapies was lower in Black and Asian/Pacific Islander (vs. White patients: adjusted odds ratio [OR adjusted ], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.92 and OR adjusted 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98) and in Medicare- or Medicaid-insured (vs. privately-insured; OR adjusted , 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.77 and OR adjusted , 0.68; 95% CI, 0.63-0.74), although they had the greatest length of stay and hospitalization charges. In-hospital mortality was higher in the lowest income quartile (vs. highest quartile; OR adjusted , 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.17). Among high-risk PE, patients of other than the White race had the highest in-hospital mortality., Conclusion: We observed inequalities in advanced therapies used for acute PE and higher in-hospital mortality in races other than White. Low socioeconomic status was also associated with lesser use of advanced treatment modalities and greater in-hospital mortality. Future studies should further explore and consider the long-term impact of social inequities in PE management., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Intensive care units (ICU) capacities are one of the most critical determinants in health-care management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the ICU-admission and case-fatality rate as well as characteristics and outcomes of patient admitted to ICU in order to identify predictors and associated conditions for worsening and case-fatality in this critical ill patient-group., Methods: We used the German nationwide inpatient sample to analyze all hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis in Germany between January and December 2020. All hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection during the year 2020 were included in the present study and were stratified according ICU-admission., Results: Overall, 176,137 hospitalizations of patients with COVID-19-infection (52.3% males; 53.6% aged ≥70 years) were reported in Germany during 2020. Among them, 27,053 (15.4%) were treated in ICU. COVID-19-patients treated on ICU were younger [70.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 59.0-79.0) vs. 72.0 (IQR 55.0-82.0) years, P < 0.001], more often males (66.3 vs. 48.8%, P < 0.001), had more frequently cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cardiovascular risk-factors with increased in-hospital case-fatality (38.4 vs. 14.2%, P < 0.001). ICU-admission was independently associated with in-hospital death [OR 5.49 (95% CI 5.30-5.68), P < 0.001]. Male sex [OR 1.96 (95% CI 1.90-2.01), P < 0.001], obesity [OR 2.20 (95% CI 2.10-2.31), P < 0.001], diabetes mellitus [OR 1.48 (95% CI 1.44-1.53), P < 0.001], atrial fibrillation/flutter [OR 1.57 (95% CI 1.51-1.62), P < 0.001], and heart failure [OR 1.72 (95% CI 1.66-1.78), P < 0.001] were independently associated with ICU-admission., Conclusion: During 2020, 15.4% of the hospitalized COVID-19-patients were treated on ICUs with high case-fatality. Male sex, CVD and cardiovascular risk-factors were independent risk-factors for ICU admission., Competing Interests: SB received lecture/consultant fees from Bayer HealthCare, Concept Medical, BTG Pharmaceuticals, INARI, Boston Scientific, and LeoPharma; institutional grants from Boston Scientific, Bentley, Bayer HealthCare, INARI, Medtronic, Concept Medical, Bard, and Sanofi; and economical support for travel/congress costs from Daiichi Sankyo, BTG Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer HealthCare, outside the submitted work. CE-K reports having from Amarin Germany, Amgen GmbH, Bayer Vital, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Leo Pharma, MSD Sharp & Dohme, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, and Sanofi-Aventis GmbH. SKon reports institutional grants and personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; institutional grants from Inari Medical; and personal lecture/advisory fees from MSD and Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer. TM is PI of the DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany. LH received lecture/consultant fees from MSD and Actelion, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Keller, Farmakis, Valerio, Koelmel, Wild, Barco, Schmidt, Espinola-Klein, Konstantinides, Münzel, Sagoschen and Hobohm.)

Catheter-directed interventions have slowly been gaining ground in the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE), especially in patients with increased risk of bleeding. The goal of this study is to summarize the evidence for the efficacy and safety of percutaneous thrombectomy (PT) in patients with contraindications to systemic and local thrombolysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus and the Web of Science databases for studies from inception to March 2022. We included patients with intermediate- and high-risk PE with contraindications to thrombolysis; patients who received systematic or local thrombolysis were excluded. Primary endpoint was in-hospital and 30-day mortality, with secondary outcomes based on hemodynamic and radiographic changes. Major bleeding events were assessed as a safety endpoint. Seventeen studies enrolled 455 patients, with a mean age of 58.6 years and encompassing 50.4% females. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 4% (95% CI 3-6%) and 5% (95% CI 3-9%) for all-comers, respectively. We found a post-procedural reduction in systolic and mean pulmonary arterial pressures by 15.4 mmHg (95% CI 7-23.7) and 10.3 mmHg (95% CI 3.1-17.5) respectively. The RV/LV ratio and Miller Index were reduced by 0.42 (95% CI 0.38-46) and 7.8 (95% CI 5.2-10.5). Major bleeding events occurred in 4% (95% CI 3-6%). This is the first meta-analysis to report pooled outcomes on PT in intermediate- and high-risk PE patients without the use of systemic or local thrombolytics. The overall mortality rate is comparable to other contemporary treatments, and is an important modality particularly in those with contraindications for adjunctive thrombolytic therapy. Further studies are needed to understand the interplay of anticoagulation with PT and catheter-directed thrombolysis., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Although a high prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been reported in association with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in critically ill patients, nationwide data on the outcome of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and PE are still limited. Thus, we investigated seasonal trends and predictors of in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19 and PE in Germany., Methods: We used a German nationwide inpatient sample to analyse data on hospitalisations among COVID-19 patients with and without PE during 2020, and to detect changes in PE prevalence and case fatality in comparison with 2019., Results: We analysed 176 137 COVID-19 hospitalisations in 2020; PE was recorded in 1.9% (n=3362) of discharge certificates. Almost one-third of patients with COVID-19 and PE died during the in-hospital course (28.7%) compared with COVID-19 patients without PE (17.7%). Between 2019 and 2020, numbers of PE-related hospitalisations were largely unchanged (98 485 versus 97 718), whereas the case fatality rate of PE increased slightly in 2020 (from 12.7% to 13.1%; p<0.001). Differences in case fatality were found between PE patients with and without COVID-19 in 2020 (28.7% versus 12.5%; p<0.001), corresponding to a 3.1-fold increased risk of PE-related death (OR 3.16, 95% CI 2.91-3.42; p<0.001) in the presence of COVID-19., Conclusions: In Germany, the prevalence of PE events during hospitalisations was similar in 2019 and 2020. However, the fatality rate among patients with both COVID-19 and PE was substantially higher than that in those with only one of these diseases, suggesting a life-threatening additive prognostic impact of the COVID-19-PE combination., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: L. Hobohm reports lecture/consultant fees from MSD and Actelion, outside the submitted work. I. Sagoschen reports lecture/consultant fees from Hamilton Medical and Novalung, outside the submitted work. S. Barco reports lecture/consultant fees from Bayer HealthCare, Concept Medical, BTG Pharmaceuticals, INARI, Boston Scientific and LeoPharma; institutional grants from Boston Scientific, Bentley, Bayer HealthCare, INARI, Medtronic, Concept Medical, Bard and Sanofi; and financial support for travel/congress costs from Daiichi Sankyo, BTG Pharmaceuticals and Bayer HealthCare, outside the submitted work. I.T. Farmakis reports no conflict of interests. U. Fedeli reports no conflict of interests. S. Koelmel reports no conflict of interests. T. Gori reports consultancy and lecture honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. C. Espinola-Klein reports lecture fees and/or travel costs from Amarin Germany, Amgen GmbH, Bayer Vital, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Leo Pharma, MSD, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer Pharma GmbH and Sanofi-Aventis GmbH. T. Münzel is PI of the DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Rhine Main, Mainz, Germany. S. Konstantinides reports institutional grants and personal lecture/advisory fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim and Boston Scientific; institutional grants from Inari Medical and Actelion; and personal lecture/advisory fees from MSD and BMS/Pfizer. K. Keller reports no conflict of interests., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: Pulmonary embolism is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in Western countries. In the United States, pulmonary embolism-related mortality rates have plateaued in the general population after an initial decrease in the past 20 years., Objective: This study aimed to describe the changes in pulmonary embolism-related maternal mortality rates in the United States over the past 2 decades., Study Design: In this epidemiologic study of public vital registration data (death certificates encompassing underlying and contributing causes of death) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Multiple Cause of Death database (2003-2020), we identified all maternal deaths with a pulmonary embolism code listed in any position of the death certificates. We investigated the changes in annual crude pulmonary embolism-related maternal mortality rates for the years 2003 to 2020, considering the effect of the introduction of the pregnancy checkbox in death certificates on the pulmonary embolism-related maternal mortality rates., Results: Overall, 735 pulmonary embolism-related maternal deaths out of 12,871 total maternal deaths (5.7%) were recorded between 2003 and 2020; the overall pulmonary embolism-related maternal mortality rate was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.10) per 100,000 live births. The pulmonary embolism-related maternal mortality rate increased from 0.93 in 2003 to 1.96 in 2020; however, when accounting for the implementation of the pregnancy checkbox in the death certificates, the trends in pulmonary embolism-related maternal mortality were largely unchanged from 2003 to 2020. The crude pulmonary embolism-related maternal mortality rates differed across maternal age groups (overall 0.61, 1.09, and 3.83 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births for those aged ≤24, 25-39, and ≥40 years, respectively) and racial/ethnicity groups (2.89, 0.47, 0.77, and 0.63 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births for Black non-Hispanics, other non-Hispanics, White non-Hispanics, and Hispanics, respectively)., Conclusion: Maternal mortality rates related to pulmonary embolism did not decrease during the period from 2003 to 2020, as opposed to mortality rates related to pulmonary embolism in the general population. More research is required to assess whether improvement in venous thromboembolism prevention and pulmonary embolism diagnosis and management strategies might reduce death owing to pulmonary embolism in this vulnerable population., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In this review, we discuss the evidence regarding the course and management of COVID-19 in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the challenges in PAH management during the pandemic and, lastly, the long-term complications of COVID-19 in relation to pulmonary vascular disease. The inherent PAH disease characteristics, as well as age, comorbidities, and the patient's functional status act synergistically to define the prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with PAH. Management of COVID-19 should follow the general guidelines, while PAH-targeted therapies should be continued. The pandemic has caused a shift toward telemedicine in the chronic care of patients with PAH. Whether COVID-19 could predispose to the development of chronic pulmonary hypertension is a subject of future investigation., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim of this narrative review is to summarize the functional and hemodynamic implications of acute PE and PE sequelae, namely the post-PE syndrome. Briefly, we will first describe the epidemiology, diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic approaches of acute PE. Then, we will provide a definition of the post-PE syndrome and present the so far accumulated evidence regarding its epidemiology and the implications that arise for further diagnosis and treatment. Lastly, we will explore the most devastating long-term complication of PE, namely chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), and recent advances in its management.

Background: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) has detrimental impact on patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. Data on CAT education, communication, and awareness among the general cancer population are scanty., Methods: We present the preliminary results of an ongoing patient-centered survey including 27 items covering major spheres of CAT. The survey, available in 14 languages, was promoted and disseminated online through social networks, email newsletters, websites, and media., Results: As of September 20, 2022, 749 participants from 27 countries completed the survey. Overall, 61.8% (n = 460) of responders were not aware of their risk of CAT. Among those who received information on CAT, 26.2% (n = 56) were informed only at the time of CAT diagnosis. Over two thirds (69.1%, n = 501) of participants received no education on signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE); among those who were educated about the possible clinical manifestations, 58.9% (n = 119) were given instructions to seek consultation in case of VTE suspicion. Two hundred twenty-four respondents (30.9%) had a chance to discuss the potential use of primary thromboprophylaxis with health-care providers. Just over half (58.7%, n = 309) were unaware of the risks of bleeding associated with anticoagulation, despite being involved in anticoagulant-related discussions or exposed to anticoagulants. Most responders (85%, n = 612) valued receiving CAT education as highly relevant; however, 51.7% (n = 375) expressed concerns about insufficient time spent and clarity of education received., Conclusions: This ongoing survey involving cancer patients with diverse ethnic, cultural, and geographical backgrounds highlights important patient knowledge gaps. These findings warrant urgent interventions to improve education and awareness, and reduce CAT burden., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background: Performance status (PS) is a reliable prognostic tool for overall survival in patients with cancer-associated pulmonary embolism (PE). However, its association with venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding remains unclear., Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate whether PS at the time of PE diagnosis and its course during follow-up are linked to VTE-related outcomes., Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE Cancer study, multivariable survival analysis was used to examine the association of PS with anticoagulation discontinuation and the composite primary outcome of VTE recurrence or major bleeding in patients with cancer-associated PE. PS was assessed using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale at baseline and at predefined study follow-up visits., Results: Overall, 652 patients with cancer-associated PE were included. During 12-month follow-up, PS worsened in 317 of 642 patients (49.4%) with complete ECOG data at the end of follow-up. Those with worse ECOG values over follow-up were more likely to discontinue anticoagulation for any reason apart from death (adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.31-1.93). The composite primary outcome occurred in 57 of 500 patients with baseline ECOG status 0 or 1 and in 32 of 152 patients with ECOG status 2 (cumulative incidence at 12 months 10.7% [95% CI: 8.2%-13.9%] vs 14.4% [95% CI: 9.7%-21.3%]). Worse ECOG values during follow-up were associated with greater risk for the composite outcome (adjusted HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.24-3.67)., Conclusions: ECOG PS is a valuable indicator for predicting VTE-related outcomes and may inform decision making regarding anticoagulation during follow-up in patients with cancer-associated PE., Competing Interests: This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Daiichi Sankyo (grant DSE-DE-CV-20001). Dr Barco has received lecture and consulting fees from Bayer HealthCare, Concept Medical, BTG Pharmaceuticals, Inari Medical, Boston Scientific, and LeoPharma; has received institutional grants from Boston Scientific, Bentley, Bayer HealthCare, Inari Medical, Medtronic, Concept Medical, Bard, and Sanofi; and has received financial support for travel and congress costs from Daiichi Sankyo, BTG Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer HealthCare, outside the submitted work. Dr Konstantinides has received institutional grants and personal lecture and advisory fees from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; has received institutional grants from Inari Medical; and has received personal lecture and advisory fees from Merck Sharpe & Dohme and Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Although the initial use of combination treatment has been proven to be beneficial for patients' clinical outcomes, there are scarce data on its haemodynamic effects. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of an initial combination of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies on haemodynamic parameters in treatment-naïve PAH patients., Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science was performed. We considered eligible studies with an intervention of initial PAH-targeted combination therapy in treatment-naïve PAH patients with or without monotherapy control. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for the difference between baseline and follow-up in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and other haemodynamic parameters., Results: In 880 patients receiving initial combination therapy PVR was reduced by -6.5 Wood Units (95% CI -7.4--5.7 Wood Units) or by -52% (95% CI -56%--48%, I 2 =0%) compared to baseline. Initial triple therapy including a parenteral prostanoid resulted in significantly greater PVR reduction (-67% versus -50% with all other combination therapies, p=0.01). The effect was more pronounced in younger patients (p=0.02). Compared to baseline, there was -12.2 mmHg (95% CI -14.0--10.4 mmHg) decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure, 0.9 L·min -1 ·m -2 (95% CI 0.8-1.1 L·min -1 ·m -2 ) increase in cardiac index, -3.2 mmHg (95% CI -4.1--2.3 mmHg) decrease in right atrial pressure and 8.6% (95% CI 6.9-10.3%) increase in mixed venous oxygen saturation. In the controlled studies, initial combination therapy reduced PVR by -4.2 Wood Units (95% CI -6.1--2.4 Wood Units) compared to monotherapy., Conclusion: Initial combination therapy leads to remarkable haemodynamic amelioration. Parenteral prostanoids should be considered early, especially in more severely affected patients, to enable right ventricular reverse remodelling., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: I.T. Farmakis has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Vrana has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S-A. Mouratoglou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Zafeiropoulos has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Zanos has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Giannakoulas has received fees for lectures and/or consultation from Actelion, Bayer, ELPEN Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly and United Therapeutics., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Background As mortality from pulmonary embolism (PE) decreases, the personal and societal costs among survivors are receiving increasing attention. Detailing this burden would support an efficient public health resource allocation. We aimed to provide estimates for the economic and disease burden of PE also accounting for long-term health care use and both direct and indirect costs beyond the acute phase. Methods and Results This is a cost-of-illness analysis with a bottom-up approach based on data from the PREFER in VTE registry (Prevention of Thromboembolic Events-European Registry in Venous Thromboembolism). We calculated direct (clinical events and anticoagulation) and indirect costs (loss of productivity) of an acute PE event and its 12-month follow-up in 2020 Euros. We estimated a disability weight for the 12-month post-PE status and corresponding disability adjusted life years presumably owing to PE. Disease-specific costs in the first year of follow-up after an incident PE case ranged between 9135 Euros and 10 620 Euros. The proportion of indirect costs was 42% to 49% of total costs. Costs were lowest in patients with ongoing cancer, mainly because productivity loss was less evident in this already burdened population. The calculated disability weight for survivors who were cancer free 12 months post-PE was 0.017, and the estimated disability adjusted life years per incident case were 1.17. Conclusions The economic burden imposed by PE to society and affected patients is considerable, and productivity loss is its main driver. The disease burden from PE is remarkable and translates to the loss of roughly 1.2 years of healthy life per incident PE case.

Purpose: Atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) recorded with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have been associated with the development of clinical atrial fibrillation (AF) and increase in stroke and death risk. We sought to perform a systematic review with a meta-analysis to evaluate the prevalence of AHREs detected by CIEDs, their association with stroke risk, development of clinical AF, and mortality among patients without a documented history of AF., Methods: We searched several databases, ClinicalTrials.gov, references of reviews, and meeting abstract books without any language restrictions up to 9 September 2020. We studied patients with CIEDs in whom AHREs were detected. Exclusion criterion was AF history. Our primary outcome was the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with AHREs., Results: We deemed eligible eight studies for the meta-analysis enrolling a total of 4322 patients with CIED and without a documented AF history. The overall AHRE incidence ratio was estimated to be 17.56 (95% CI, 8.61 to 35.79) cases per 100 person-years. Evidence of moderate certainty suggests that patients with documented AHREs were 4.45 times (95% CI 2.87-6.91) more likely to develop clinical AF. Evidence of low confidence suggests that AHREs were associated with a 1.90-fold increased stroke risk (95% CI 1.19-3.05). AHREs were not associated with a statistically significant increased mortality risk., Conclusion: The present systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that among patients without a documented history of AF, the detection of AHREs by CIEDs was associated with significant increased risk of clinical AF and stroke., Registration Number (doi): Available in https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ZRF6M ., (© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To determine the effect of major antihypertensive classes on erectile function (EF) in patients with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease., Methods: We performed a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics on EF compared to each other and to placebo (PROSPERO: CRD42020189529). Similarly, we performed a network meta-analysis to explore the effect of different β-blockers on erectile function (nebivolol, other vasodilating and non-vasodilating β-blockers, placebo). Records were identified through search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases and sources of grey literature until September 2020., Results: We included 25 studies (7784 patients) in the qualitative and 16 studies in the quantitative synthesis. The risk of bias was concerning or high in the majority of studies, and inconsistency was also high. No significant differences in EF were demonstrated in the pairwise comparisons between major antihypertensive classes. Similarly, when placebo was set as the reference treatment group, no treatment strategy yielded significant effects on EF. In the β-blockers analysis, nebivolol contributed a beneficial effect on EF only when compared to non-vasodilatory β-blockers (OR 2.92, 95%CI 1.3-6.5) and not when compared to placebo (OR 2.87, 95%CI 0.75-11.04) or to other vasodilatory β-blockers (OR 2.15, 95%CI 0.6-7.77)., Conclusion: All antihypertensive medication classes seem to exert neutral or insignificant effects on EF. Further high-quality studies are needed to better explore the effects of antihypertensive medication on EF., (© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Routine coronary artery disease (CAD) secondary prevention strategies target standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs), which include: diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking. However, a significant proportion of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) present without any SMuRFs. The angiographic severity of disease in this population has not yet been investigated., Methods: After propensity score matching of patients without SMuRFs and patients with ≥1 SMuRFs (ratio 1:3), we used zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling to investigate the relationship of SMuRF-less status with the angiographic severity of CAD, as measured by the SYNTAX score. Survival analysis was performed to investigate differences in all-cause mortality at 30 days and at the end of follow-up period., Results: We analyzed 534 patients presenting with ACS who underwent coronary angiography. Of them, 56 (10.5%) presented without any SMuRF. After propensity score matching, the median SYNTAX score was 13.8 (IQR 0-22.1) in 56 SMuRF-less patients and 14 (IQR 5-25) in 166 patients with ≥1 SMuRFs. SMuRF-less status was associated with increased odds of zero SYNTAX score [zero-part model: odds ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-4.33], but not with decreased SYNTAX score among patients with non-zero SYNTAX score (count-part model: incidence rate ratio = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.79-1.24); the overall distribution of the SYNTAX score was similar between the two groups ( p = 0.26). The 30-day risk for all-cause mortality was higher for SMuRF-less patients compared to patients with ≥1 SMuRFs [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.58, 95% CI: 1.30-9.88]; however, the all-cause mortality risk was not different between the two groups over a median 1.7-year follow-up (HR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.83-3.57)., Conclusion: Among patients with ACS, the absence of SMuRFs is associated with increased odds for non-obstructive CAD and with increased short-term mortality rates., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Papazoglou, Farmakis, Zafeiropoulos, Moysidis, Karagiannidis, Stalikas, Kartas, Stamos, Sofidis, Doundoulakis, Giannopoulos, Giannakoulas and Sianos.)

Blood pressure (BP) phenotypes have a prognostic significance for target organ damage in long-term studies. However, it remains uncertain whether a single baseline phenotype classification is reproducible over time and represents accurately the patients' BP status. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension either with ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM). PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched to identify studies with paired baseline office BP and ABPM or HBPM measurements at two timepoints. The outcome of the analysis was the individual phenotype reproducibility between the baseline and follow-up timepoints. The used effect measure was Cohen's kappa coefficient. We found 15 studies eligible for the meta-analysis enrolling a total of 5729 patients. The reproducibility of masked hypertension was better with ABPM, kappa reliability test: 0.41 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.49], than with HBPM, kappa reliability test: 0.26 (95% CI: 0.10-0.40). The reproducibility of office-based hypertension with both methods was low, indicating slight agreement. Kappa reliability test was slightly better with ABPM (κ: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.41) than with HBPM (κ: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.27). This systematic review and meta-analysis show a slight to fair reproducibility of masked hypertension and office-based hypertension assessed through ABPM and HBPM. Considering that poor reproducibility may be a result of office BP measurements, an ABPM/HBPM-based strategy should be established for the evaluation and treatment of patients with masked hypertension or office-based hypertension., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Our study aimed to investigate the association between platelet indices and their in-hospital change and long-term prognosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Data from a randomized controlled trial (NCT02927808) recruiting ACS patients were analyzed (survival analysis). The examined variables were platelet count (PC), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and plateletcrit (PCT) on admission and discharge, as well as their alteration during hospitalization. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke or hospitalization for unstable angina) and all-cause mortality, while secondary endpoints were all-cause hospitalization and bleeding events. The study included 252 patients with a follow-up of 39 (28-45) months. In the univariate analysis, MACE was associated with discharge PC [hazard ratio (HR) 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-4.40], discharge MPV (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.25-0.94), and in-hospital PC difference (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.51). In the multivariable analysis, only in-hospital PC decrease correlated with lower MACE incidence (adjusted HR .27, 95% CI 0.14-0.54) and lower all-cause hospitalization risk (adjusted HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.68). PC reduction during hospitalization for ACS is an independent predictor of better prognosis.

Competing Interests: None to declare.

Background: Currently, potent P2Y 12 inhibition with the use of prasugrel or ticagrelor is the mainstay of treatment after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines recommend the use of prasugrel over ticagrelor in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) intended to receive invasive management (class IIa recommendation), however there are contradictory views regarding this recommendation., Aim: To compare oral P2Y 12 inhibitors in NSTE-ACS in terms of efficacy and safety with a focus on patients intended to proceed to invasive management., Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science to identify studies that compared different oral P2Y 12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor) in patients with NSTE-ACS. Efficacy outcomes included the major adverse cardiovascular events outcome and safety outcomes included minor and major bleedings. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis., Results: Nine studies (n=35 441 patients) were included in the systematic review. There was no difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor in the composite cardiovascular end point (prasugrel vs ticagrelor HR=0.80, 95% CI=0.61 to 1.06) in all patients with NSTE-ACS. In patients intended to receive invasive management, prasugrel resulted in a reduction of the composite cardiovascular end point both versus clopidogrel (HR=0.76, 95% CI=0.61 to 0.95) and ticagrelor (HR=0.74, 95% CI=0.56 to 0.98). Inconsistency was moderate and non-significant (I 2 =27%, total Q p=0.2). Prasugrel ranked as the most efficient treatment in the composite cardiovascular efficacy outcome, all-cause death, myocardial infarction and definite stent thrombosis, while clopidogrel ranked as safest in the bleeding outcomes., Conclusion: In patients with NSTE-ACS intended to receive invasive management, an antiplatelet strategy based on prasugrel is more efficient than a similar strategy based on ticagrelor on a moderate level of evidence. This analysis supports the current recommendations by the ESC guidelines., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Pulmonary embolism is a known complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Epidemiological population data focusing on pulmonary embolism-related mortality is limited., Methods: Veneto is a region in Northern Italy counting 4,879,133 inhabitants in 2020. All ICD-10 codes from death certificates (1st January 2018 to 31st December 2020) were examined. Comparisons were made between 2020 (COVID-19 outbreak) and the average of the two-year period 2018-2019. All-cause, COVID-19-related and the following cardiovascular deaths have been studied: pulmonary embolism, hypertensive disease, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation/flutter, and cerebrovascular diseases., Results: In 2020, a total of 56,412 deaths were recorded, corresponding to a 16% (n = 7806) increase compared to the period 2018-2019. The relative percentage increase during the so-called first and second waves was 19% and 44%, respectively. Of 7806 excess deaths, COVID-19 codes were reported in 90% of death certificates. The percentage increase in pulmonary embolism-related deaths was 27% (95%CI 19-35%), 1018 deaths during the year 2020, compared to 804 mean annual deaths in the period 2018-2019. This was more evident among men, who experience an absolute increase of 147 deaths (+45%), than in women (+67 deaths; +14%). The increase was primarily driven by deaths recorded during the second wave (+91% in October-December). An excess of deaths, particularly among men and during the second wave, was also observed for other cardiovascular diseases, notably hypertensive disease, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease, and ischemic heart disease., Conclusions: We observed a considerable increase of all-cause mortality during the year 2020. This was mainly driven by COVID-19 and its complications. The relative increase in the number of pulmonary embolism-related deaths was more prominent during the second wave, suggesting a possible underdiagnosis during the first wave., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Diagnosis of acute PE in pregnant women with haemodynamic instability is following the general integrated risk-adapted diagnostic algorithm and starts with bedside echocardiography to assess RV function. If RV dysfunction is identified, a prompt and immediate reperfusion without further imaging should be initiated. Although pregnancy is listed as a relative contraindication of systemic thrombolysis, in pregnant women with acute PE and haemodynamic instability thrombolysis must be considered. In those cases, other treatment strategies as surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed low-dose thromboylysis or percutaneous thrombectomy should be taken into consideration as well. A multidisciplinary team with experience of PE management in pregnancy should be consulted to reach consensus on the best treatment approach., Competing Interests: LH reports lecture/consultant fees from MSD and Janssen, outside the submitted work. SK reports institutional grants and personal lecture/consultant fees from Bayer AG, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Boston Scientific; institutional grants from Inari Medical; and personal lecture/consultant fees from Pfizer- Bristol-Myers Squibb and MSD, all outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2022 Hobohm, Farmakis, Münzel, Konstantinides and Keller.)