Search

(1) Background: Comprehensive and timely lung cancer (LC) staging is essential for prognosis and management. The Lung Diagnostic Assessment Program (LDAP) in Southeastern (SE) Ontario aims to provide rapid, guideline-concordant care for suspected LC patients. We evaluated factors affecting the completeness and timeliness of staging for stage I-III LC patients in SE Ontario, including the impact of LDAP management. (2) Methods: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using the LDAP database (January 2017-December 2019), linked with the Ontario Cancer Registry, to identify newly diagnosed LC patients. A Cox model approach identified variables associated with staging completeness and timeliness. (3) Results: Among 755 patients, 459 (60.8%) were managed through LDAP. Optimal staging was achieved in 596 patients (78.9%), 23 (3.0%) had alternative staging, and 136 (18.0%) had incomplete staging. In the adjusted analyses, LDAP management was associated with a higher likelihood of complete staging (OR 2.29, p < 0.0001) and faster staging completion (β = -18.53, p < 0.0001). Increased distance to PET centres was associated with a longer time to complete staging (β = 8.95 per 100 km, p = 0.0007), as was longer time to diagnosis (β = 21.63 per 30 days, p < 0.0001). (4) Conclusions: LDAP management in SE Ontario significantly improved staging completeness and shortened staging time for stage I-III LC patients.

Background: Cancer patients' attitudes toward progression-free survival (PFS) gains offered by treatment are not well understood, particularly in the absence of overall survival (OS) gains. The objectives were to describe patients' willingness to accept treatment that offers PFS gains without OS gains, to compare these findings with treatments offering OS gains, and to qualitatively summarize patients' reasons for their preferences., Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional, convergent mixed-methods study design recruited patients who had received at least 3 months of systemic therapy for incurable solid tumors. A treatment trade-off exercise determined the gains in imaging PFS that patients require to prefer additional systemic treatment for a scenario of a newly diagnosed, asymptomatic, incurable abdominal tumor. A qualitative, descriptive, thematic analysis explored factors influencing patients' decisions, and a narrative method integrated the quantitative and qualitative findings., Results: In total, 100 patients participated (63% were older than 60 years of age). If additional treatment with added toxicity offered no OS advantage, 17% would prefer it for no PFS benefit; 26% for some PFS benefit (range, 3-9 months), whereas 51% would decline it regardless of PFS benefit. Similarly, 71% preferred additional treatment offering a 6-month OS advantage dependent on described toxicity levels (P = .03). A spectrum of reasons for these preferences reflected the complexity of participants' attitudes and values., Conclusions: Prolongation of time to progression was not universally valued. Most patients did not prefer treatments that negatively affect quality of life for PFS gains alone. Implications for individual decision making, policy, and trials research are discussed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Competing Interests: AG reports consulting fees from Seattle Genetics and speaking honoraria from Curio. BW reports research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ontario Institute of Cancer Research, Queen's University, National Breast Cancer Foundation of Australia, and the Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada; and honoraria from AstraZeneca. WvdG reports institutional research grants from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and SpringworksTx; and institutional consulting fees from SpringworksTx, PTC Therapeutics, and Agenus. ES-P-d-C reports speaking honoraria from Lactrealis and is on the Board of Directors of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. SS reports travel support from Queen's University. FYM reports consulting fees from Cancer em foco, AstraZeneca, and IASLC. BLM reports speaking honoraria from Servier Pharmaceuticals. SB reports honoraria for advisory boards from Taiho, Astellas, Merck, and Amgen. DG reports consulting fees from Vivio Health; stock ownership in TailorMed and Vivio Health; and serves as Board Member of Optimal Cancer Care Alliance. BG reports consulting fees from Vivio Health. KH reports research support from Pfizer. DK reports speaking honoraria from Amgen and MSD. KK reports consulting fees from Vivio Health and stock ownership in Vivio Health and Cadex Genomics. DC is the Editor-in-Chief of The Lancet Oncology. All other authors declare no competing interests. The opinions expressed by the authors are their own and this material should not be interpreted as representing the official viewpoint of the US Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institutes of Health, or the National Cancer Institute. The CSO organising committee gratefully acknowledges Robert J Shillman PhD (Doctor Bob) for his support of the initial planning meeting in April, 2023.

The emergence of the precision medicine paradigm in oncology has led to increasing interest in the integration of real-world data (RWD) into cancer clinical research. As sources of real-world evidence (RWE), such data could potentially help address the uncertainties that surround the adoption of novel anticancer therapies into the clinic following their investigation in clinical trials. At present, RWE-generating studies which investigate antitumour interventions seem to primarily focus on collecting and analysing observational RWD, typically forgoing the use of randomisation despite its methodological benefits. This is appropriate in situations where randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are not feasible and non-randomised RWD analyses can offer valuable insights. Nevertheless, depending on how they are designed, RCTs have the potential to produce strong and actionable RWE themselves. The choice of which methodology to employ for RWD studies should be guided by the nature of the research question they are intended to answer. Here, we attempt to define some of the questions that do not necessarily require the conduct of RCTs. Moreover, we outline the strategy of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) to contribute to the generation of robust and high-quality RWE by prioritising the execution of pragmatic trials and studies set up according to the trials-within-cohorts approach. If treatment allocation cannot be left up to random chance due to practical or ethical concerns, the EORTC will consider undertaking observational RWD research based on the target trial principle. New EORTC-sponsored RCTs may also feature concurrent prospective cohorts composed of off-trial patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: R.S.: Nothing to declare. M.V.H.: Nothing to declare. J.B.: Nothing to declare. C.M.B.: Nothing to declare. J.J.C.: Nothing to declare. A.D.: I have received institutional research funding from Janssen and IQVIA, speaker honoraria from Janssen and Medtronic, and am founder, shareholder and employee of Medical Data Works B.V. E.A.E.: Nothing to declare. A.F.: Nothing to declare. A.G.: Nothing to declare. M.A.H.: My research is supported by funding from NIH, the US Veterans Administration, and PCORI. I am a consultant for Cytel, data science adviser for ProPublica, and member of the scientific advisory board of ADIA Lab. None of these interests or relationships have influenced my contribution to this paper. F.H.: I report that a party related to me is employed by Janssen-Cilag GmbH as principal data scientist. P.O.: I have performed consultancy work for AAA, Bayer, Curium, MSD, Janssen and have received research grants from Bayer. P.S.: I have had advisory relationships with Merck-Serono, Servier, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp in the last three years. H.M.V.: Nothing to declare. M.W.: I have received research grants from Quercis and Versameb, and honoraria for lectures or advisory board participation or consulting from Bayer, Curevac, Medac, Novartis, Novocure, Orbus, Philogen, Roche and Sandoz. R.W.: Nothing to declare. D.L.: I am member of the EMA Management Board, member of the EMA Health Care Professionals Working Party and of the EMA Healthcare Professionals Policy Officers’ Group, and co-chair of the EMA Cancer Medicines Forum. W.T.V.D.G.: I have performed advisory work for SpringWorks, PTC Therapeutics, Agenus and received research funding from Eli Lilly, all fees going to the institute., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Regional variability in lung cancer (LC) outcomes exists across Canada, including in the province of Ontario. The Lung Diagnostic Assessment Program (LDAP) in southeastern (SE) Ontario is a rapid-assessment clinic that expedites the management of patients with suspected LC. We evaluated the association of LDAP management with LC outcomes, including survival, and characterized the variability in LC outcomes across SE Ontario., Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study by identifying patients with newly diagnosed LC through the Ontario Cancer Registry (January 2017-December 2019) and linked to the LDAP database to identify LDAP-managed patients. Descriptive data were collected. Using a Cox model approach, we compared 2-year survival for patients managed through LDAP vs. non-LDAP., Results: We identified 1832 patients, 1742 of whom met the inclusion criteria (47% LDAP-managed and 53% non-LDAP). LDAP management was associated with a lower probability of dying at 2 years (HR 0.76 vs. non-LDAP, p < 0.0001). Increasing distance from the LDAP was associated with a lower likelihood of LDAP management (OR 0.78 for every 20 km increase, p < 0.0001). LDAP-managed patients were more likely to receive specialist assessment and undergo treatments., Conclusions: In SE Ontario, initial diagnostic care provided via LDAP was independently associated with improved survival in patients with LC.

Background : Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. In Ontario, Canada, there are significant survival differences for patients with newly diagnosed LC across the 14 provincial regions. Methods : A population-based retrospective cohort study using ICES databases from 01/2007-12/2017 identified patients with newly diagnosed LC through the Ontario Cancer Registry and those with LC as the cause of death. Descriptive data included patient, disease, and system characteristics. The primary outcome was 5-year survival by region. Results : 178,202 patient records were identified; 101,263 met inclusion criteria. LC incidence varied by region (5.6-14.6/10,000), as did histologic subtype (adenocarcinoma: 27.3-46.1%). Five-year cancer-specific survival was impacted by age, rurality, pathologic subtype, stage at diagnosis, and income quintile. Timely care was inversely related to survival (fastest quintile: HR 3.22, p < 0.0001). Adjusted 5-year cancer-specific survival varied across regions (24.1%, HR 1.12; 34.0%, HR 0.89, p < 0.001). Conclusions : When adjusting for confounders, differences in survival by health region persisted, suggesting a complex interplay between patient, disease, and system factors. A single approach to improving patient care is likely to be ineffective across different systems. Quality improvement initiatives to improve patient outcomes require different approaches amongst health regions to address local disparities in care.

Aims: In 2014, in response to evidence that Canada’s tobacco use would lead, inexorably, to substantial morbidity and mortality for the foreseeable future, a group of experts convened to consider the development of a “Tobacco Endgame” for Canada. The “Tobacco Endgame” defines a time frame in which to eliminate structural, political, and social dynamics that sustain tobacco use, leading to improved population health. Strategies: A series of Background Papers describing possible measures that could contribute to the creation of a comprehensive endgame strategy for Canada was prepared in advance of the National Tobacco Endgame Summit hosted at Queen’s University in 2016. At the summit, agreement was reached to work together to achieve <5% tobacco use by 2035 (<5 by ’35). A report of the proceedings was shared widely. Achievements: Progress since 2016 has been mixed. The Summit report was followed by a national forum convened by Health Canada in March 2017, and in 2018, the Canadian Government adopted “<5 × ’35” tobacco use target in a renewed Canadian tobacco reduction strategy. Tobacco use has declined in the last 5 years, but at a rate slower than that which will be needed to achieve the <5 by ’35 goal. There remain > 5 million smokers in Canada, signaling that smoking-related diseases will continue to be an enormous health burden. Furthermore, the landscape of new products (e-cigarettes and cannabis) has created additional risks and opportunities. Future directions: A bold, reinvigorated tobacco control strategy is needed that significantly advances ongoing policy developments, including full implementation of the key demand-reduction policies of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Formidable, new disruptive policies and regulations will be needed to achieve Canada’s Endgame goal.

Background: Editorials accompanying the publication of trials in major oncology journals can have a substantial influence on clinical practice. We describe the prevalence of financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) of authors writing such editorials and the extent to which FCOIs may shape the interpretation of clinical trials., Methods: We examined editorials published in 2018 alongside trial reports in the top 5 journals that publish cancer drug trials (New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, Lancet Oncology, JAMA Oncology, and Journal of Clinical Oncology). An editorial was considered to have an FCOI if at least one of the editorialists had any disclosed FCOI. An FCOI with the same company whose drug was being discussed in the editorial was classified as a direct FCOI. Editorials were reviewed for their content and classified as being unduly favorable (defined as the presence of a positive spin without discussion of limitations) or not. Association of an FCOI and a direct FCOI with writing an unduly favorable editorial was assessed., Results: Of the 90 editorials assessed, 74% (n=67) were classified as having an FCOI with the pharmaceutical industry, and 39% (n=35) had an FCOI with the same company whose product was being discussed in the editorial (direct FCOI). Editorials were classified as being unduly favorable toward the study drug in 12% (8 of 67) and 13% (3 of 23) (P=1.0) of those with and without FCOIs, respectively; corresponding rates with and without direct FCOI were 23% (8 of 35) and 5% (3 of 55), respectively (P=.009)., Conclusions: Editorials in top oncology journals were frequently authored by experts with FCOIs, including direct FCOIs. Authoring an unduly favorable editorial for a new cancer drug was significantly associated with the author having a direct FCOI with the same company. These findings support the call for journals to ensure that authors of editorials have no direct FCOIs.

Importance: The randomized clinical trial (RCT) in oncology has evolved since its widespread adoption in the 1970s. In recent years, concerns have emerged regarding the use of putative surrogate end points, such as progression-free survival (PFS), and marginal effect sizes., Objective: To describe contemporary trends in oncology RCTs and compare these findings with earlier eras of RCT design and output., Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study of systemic therapy RCTs in breast, colorectal, and non-small cell lung cancer published in 7 major journals between 2010 and 2020. This strategy replicates prior work and allows for comparison of trends with RCTs published between 1995 to 2004 and 2005 to 2009., Main Outcomes and Measures: Data on RCT design, funding, results, and reporting were extracted from the published RCT report. Findings from the current period (2010-2020) were compared with data from RCTs published from 1995 to 2004 and 2005 to 2009. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to analyze temporal trends., Results: The cohort included 298 RCTs (132 [44%] breast, 111 [37%] non-small cell lung cancer, 55 [19%] colorectal cancer). Experimental treatment included molecular inhibitor (171 of 298 [57%]), cytotoxic (83 of 298 [28%]), hormone (15 of 298 [5%]), and immune (24 of 298 [8%]) therapies. Sixty-nine percent (206 of 298) of RCTs were of palliative intent. The most common primary end point is now PFS; this has increased substantially over time (from 0% [0 of 167] to 18% [25 of 137] to 42% [125 of 298]; P < .001). Of 298 RCTs, 265 (89%) are now funded by industry (previously 95 of 167 [57%] and 107 of 137 [78%]; P < .001). Fifty-eight percent (173 of 298) of trials met their primary end point. Among positive trials, median improvement in overall survival and PFS was 3.4 and 2.9 months, respectively. More than one-third (117 of 298 [39%]) of reports used a professional medical writer; this increased substantially during the study period (from 3 of 27 [11%] in 2010 to 12 of 18 [67%] in 2020; P < .001)., Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study suggests that contemporary oncology RCTs now largely measure putative surrogate end points and are almost exclusively funded by the pharmaceutical industry. The increasing role of medical writers warrants attention. To demonstrate that new cancer treatments are high value, the oncology community needs to consider the extent to which study end points and target effect size provide meaningful benefit to patients.

Importance: Treatments for melanoma brain metastasis changed between 2007 and 2016 with the advent of new radiotherapy techniques, targeted therapeutic agents, and immunotherapy. Changes in clinical outcomes over time have not been systematically investigated in large population-based studies., Objective: To investigate the association of innovations in radiotherapy techniques and systemic therapies with clinical outcomes among patients with melanoma brain metastasis., Design, Setting and Participants: This population-based cohort study included all patients who received radiotherapy and/or surgery for the treatment of melanoma brain metastasis in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2016. Brain treatment patterns and clinical outcomes were described by period (2007-2009, 2010-2012, and 2013-2016). Provincial administrative records were used to obtain data on surgery, radiotherapy, and drugs. Follow-up data were censored on August 31, 2016. A Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed. Data were analyzed between November 8, 2017 and May 13, 2020., Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival, whole-brain radiotherapy-free survival, and time to subsequent brain treatment., Results: A total of 1096 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.7 [14.0] years; 751 men [68.5%]) with melanoma brain metastasis received treatment in Ontario between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2016. Of those, 326 patients received treatment from 2007 to 2009 (period 1), 310 patients received treatment from 2010 to 2012 (period 2), and 460 patients received treatment from 2013 to 2016 (period 3). Patient age, other sociodemographic characteristics, and disease factors were similar between periods. Whole-brain radiotherapy was the first local brain-directed treatment used in 246 patients (75.5%; 95% CI, 70.8%-80.1%) in period 1, decreasing to 239 patients (52.0%; 95% CI, 47.4%-56.5%) in period 3. The use of partial-brain radiotherapy techniques as the first treatment increased from 11 patients (3.4%; 95% CI, 1.4%-5.3%) in period 1 to 98 patients (21.3%; 95% CI, 17.6%-25.0%) in period 3. After the first treatment for melanoma brain metastasis, the use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immunotherapy increased from less than 6 patients (<1.8%; 95% CI, <0.4% to <3.3%) in period 1 to 188 patients (40.9%; 95% CI, 36.4%-45.4%) in period 3. Overall survival was greater in period 3 (1-year survival, 21.8% [95% CI, 17.9%-25.9%] and 2-year survival, 13.8% [95% CI, 10.4%-17.8%]; Wilcoxon P = .001) compared with period 1 (1-year survival, 12.3% [95% CI, 9.0%-16.1%] and 2-year survival, 6.4% [95% CI, 4.1%-9.5%]), with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.56-0.77). The findings were unchanged after accounting for the variation in imaging practice between periods. Between period 1 and period 3, the use of whole-brain radiotherapy decreased (aHR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22-0.46), and the use of multiple brain-directed treatments increased (aHR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.48-3.14)., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that innovations in systemic therapy and radiotherapy are associated with improvements in clinical outcomes among patients with melanoma brain metastasis, even in population-wide routine practice. Overall survival improved over time, and the use of whole-brain radiotherapy decreased. However, many patients continued to receive whole-brain radiotherapy in the last period (2013-2016) examined.

Objective: To assess primary care providers' (PCPs') experiences with, perceptions of, and desired role in personalized medicine, with a focus on cancer., Design: Qualitative study involving focus groups., Setting: Urban and rural interprofessional primary care team practices in Alberta and Ontario., Participants: Fifty-one PCPs., Methods: Semistructured focus groups were conducted and audiorecorded. Recordings were transcribed and analyzed using techniques informed by grounded theory including coding, interpretations of patterns in the data, and constant comparison., Main Findings: Five focus groups with the 51 participants were conducted; 2 took place in Alberta and 3 in Ontario. Primary care providers described limited experience with personalized medicine, citing breast cancer and prenatal care as main areas of involvement. They expressed concern over their lack of knowledge, in some circumstances relying on personal experiences to inform their attitudes and practice. Participants anticipated an inevitable role in personalized medicine primarily because patients seek and trust their advice; however, there was underlying concern about the magnitude of information and pace of discovery in this area, particularly in direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing. Increased knowledge, closer ties to genetics specialists, and relevant, reliable personalized medicine resources accessible at the point of care were reported as important for successful implementation of personalized medicine., Conclusion: Primary care providers are prepared to discuss personalized medicine, but they require better resources. Models of care that support a more meaningful relationship between PCPs and genetics specialists should be pursued. Continuing education strategies need to address knowledge gaps including direct-to-consumer genetic testing, a relatively new area provoking PCP concern. Primary care providers should be mindful of using personal experiences to guide care., (Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.)

Background: Women with breast cancer and diabetes mellitus (DM) have poorer survival. Mechanisms include insulin dysregulation and/or DM related co-morbidities (CM). In MA.17 adjuvant letrozole (LET) after 5 years of tamoxifen (TAM) reduced the risk of recurrence and improved survival. We evaluated DM, hypertension (HTN), and coronary artery disease (CAD) as prognostic and predictive factors in MA.17., Patients and Methods: Disease free survival, distant disease free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Cox regression model adjusting for other prognostic factors: in women treated by placebo (PLAC) based on the presence or absence of baseline DM (n = 462), HTN (n = 1627), CAD (n = 604) or any one of these CM (n = 2049), and between LET and PLAC groups in each CM. Analyses based on nodal status were performed., Results: DM was neither prognostic nor predictive for women on extended LET. Women with one CM had similar outcomes on LET compared to women free of CM. For node positive women, the difference between LET and PLAC in DDFS was greater among women with one CM (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30 [0.15-0.60], p = 0.001) compared to those without CM (HR = 0.72 [0.45-1.16], p = 0.17, p interaction = 0.04). Women on PLAC with HTN trended towards lower DDFS (HR = 1.50 [0.98-2.3], p = 0.06) and OS (HR = 1.61 [0.95-2.72], p = 0.08) than non-HTN women. HTN women had better DDFS on LET than non-HTN women. Women with one CM on PLAC had lower OS (HR = 2.10 [1.26-3.51], p = 0.004) than those free of CM., Conclusions: DM was not prognostic or predictive of outcomes. Women with CM who remain disease free after 5 years of TAM should be offered LET. HTN trended towards a negative prognosticator and outcomes among this group were improved on LET. More studies are needed to assess impact of adrenergic stimulation as a possible link to poorer breast cancer outcomes., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive malignancy of the central nervous system in adults. Increased activity of the phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase (PI3K) signal transduction pathway is common. We performed a phase II study using PX-866, an oral PI3K inhibitor, in participants with recurrent GBM., Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed GBM at first recurrence were given oral PX-866 at a dose of 8 mg daily. An MRI and clinical exam were done every 8 weeks. Tissue was analyzed for potential predictive markers., Results: Thirty-three participants (12 female) were enrolled. Median age was 56 years (range 35-78y). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0-1 in 29 participants and 2 in the remainder. Median number of cycles was 1 (range 1-8). All participants have discontinued therapy: 27 for disease progression and 6 for toxicity (5 liver enzymes and 1 allergic reaction). Four participants had treatment-related serious adverse events (1 liver enzyme, 1 diarrhea, 2 venous thromboembolism). Other adverse effects included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and lymphopenia. Twenty-four participants had a response of progression (73%), 1 had partial response (3%, and 8 (24%) had stable disease (median, 6.3 months; range, 3.1-16.8 months). Median 6-month progression-free survival was 17%. None of the associations between stable disease and PTEN, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, or EGFRvIII status were statistically significant., Conclusions: PX-866 was relatively well tolerated. Overall response rate was low, and the study did not meet its primary endpoint; however, 21% of participants obtained durable stable disease. This study also failed to identify a statistically significant association between clinical outcome and relevant biomarkers in patients with available tissue., (© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: The phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/serine-threonine kinase PI3K/AKT pathway is postulated to be central to cancer cell development. Activation of this pathway is believed to promote angiogenesis, protein translation and cell cycle progression. A large percentage of endometrial carcinomas have demonstrated mutations within this regulation pathway which result in constitutional activation. The downstream effector protein mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) acts as a critical checkpoint in cancer cell cycling and is a logical target for drug development. The efficacy and tolerability of the oral mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus were evaluated in this study., Methods: This phase II study evaluated the single agent tolerability and activity of oral ridaforolimus administered at a dose of 40mg for 5 consecutive days followed by a 2day break, in women with recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma who had received no chemotherapy in the metastatic setting., Results: 31 of 34 patients were evaluable. Three partial responses (8.8%) were observed with response duration ranging between 7.9 and 26.5months. An additional 18 patients showed disease stabilization (52.9%) for a median duration of 6.6months. Response rates were not affected by previous chemotherapy exposure. No correlation was found between response and mutation status., Conclusion: Oral ridaforolimus was reasonably tolerated and demonstrated modest activity in women with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancers. Potential synergy between mTOR inhibition, angiogenesis and hormonal pathways warrants ongoing evaluation., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Disease-free survival (DFS) is an end-point for an increasing number of clinical trials in adjuvant and curative intent cancer treatment informing both regulatory bodies and clinical practice. DFS is seen both as a surrogate end-point and as an end-point in itself in clinical trials. Understanding the history of DFS, and some of the assumptions, limitations, and vulnerabilities for studies designed with this primary end-point are required. This commentary reviews recent drug approvals for anti-cancer agents in solid tumours in the adjuvant and curative settings, and considers the meaning of DFS from the perspectives of clinical trials and clinical practice., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Progression-free survival (PFS) is an end-point in an increasing number of cancer clinical trials, informing both regulatory bodies and clinical practice. PFS is utilised both as a surrogate end-point for overall survival and as a primary trial end-point in itself. Understanding the history of clinical trial definitions of progression provides some context for how PFS may be applied to clinical practice as well as some of its limitations that need to be considered in patient care decisions. This commentary reviews recent drug approval for anti-cancer agents in solid tumours, reviews various concepts of progression in clinical trials and outlines some future directions for patient care and clinical trial research using progression free survival., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is of increasing interest as a therapeutic strategy in many tumors. The aim of this study was to identify molecular markers associated with mTOR inhibitor activity in women with metastatic endometrial cancer., Methods: Archival tumor samples were collected from 94 women with recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer who participated in 3 National Cancer Insitute of Canada Clinical Trials Group phase 2 trials investigating single-agent mTOR inhibitors: IND160A and IND160B (temsirolimus) and IND192 (ridaforolimus). Analyses included mutational profiling using the OncoCarta Panel version 1.0 and immunohistochemical expression of the tumor suppressor gene PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue) and stathmin, a marker of PI3K activation. Associations between biomarker results and clinical outcomes were assessed., Results: Mutations were found in 32 of 73 analyzed tumors, PIK3CA (21 patients) was the most common mutated gene. Co-mutations were seen in 8 tumors, most frequently KRAS and PIK3CA (4 cases). PTEN loss was observed in 46 of 85 samples analyzed and increased stathmin expression was observed in 15 of 65 analyzed samples. No correlation was observed between biomarkers and response or progression. In patients taking concurrent metformin, there was a trend toward lower progression, of 11.8% versus 32.5% (P = .14)., Conclusions: No predictive biomarker or combination of biomarkers for mTOR inhibitor activity were identified in this study. Restriction and enrichment of study entry, especially based on archival tumor tissue, should be undertaken with caution in trials using these agents., (© 2013 American Cancer Society.)

Objective: Temsirolimus (TEM) has recently shown activity (NCIC CTG phase II trial) in endometrial cancer (EC). Despite EC having a high rate of PTEN mutation, in this trial activity was independent of PTEN and other molecular markers. We explored whether treatment related toxicity occurring in cycle one was predictive of outcomes., Methods: Patients were those enrolled on two sequential phase II studies of the NCIC CTG that evaluated single agent TEM in women with recurrent or metastatic chemotherapy naïve or treated EC. An exploratory landmark analysis examined the relationship between early treatment related toxicities as well as prior chemotherapy and efficacy outcomes (response, progression, and tumor size shrinkage) in univariate and multivariate analyses. The relationship between molecular markers and outcomes was also reexamined in patients., Results: Mucositis, diarrhea, decreased absolute neutrophil count, as well as elevated glucose, or cholesterol were not independent predictors of response or progression. Highest fasting triglyceride predicted for a 3.5% tumor shrinkage from baseline. Women previously treated with chemotherapy were at 7.37 times greater risk of progression and experienced 20.9% increased tumor growth compared to chemotherapy naïve women. Molecular markers were not predictors of response or progression., Conclusions: Except for elevation in fasting triglyceride being associated with minimal tumor shrinkage, no other relationship between efficacy and TEM induced adverse events was found. mTOR inhibition activity in EC seems greatest in chemo-naïve patients. Future studies of mTOR inhibitors in EC should focus on women without prior chemotherapy while continuing to explore molecular mechanisms of benefit., (© 2013.)

The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) task force considered aspects of the design and conduct of early (phase I and II) studies of combinations of molecular targeted agents during their 2012 meeting. The task force defined necessary non-clinical data, such as evidence of additive or synergistic effects in multiple molecularly credentialed and validated models, and appropriate pharmacodynamic marker development. A robust hypothesis was considered critical while non-clinical pharmacokinetic studies were also considered valuable. Clinical trials should include clear objectives that will prove or disprove the hypothesis. Predictive biomarkers/classifiers should be explored in phase I studies, rather than used to select patients. Trial design should be efficient and flexible rather than based on a strict progression from phase I to II to III; researchers could consider phase I studies with an expansion cohort, Phase I/II designs or phase II studies with a safety run in. Pharmacokinetics are recommended when interactions or overlapping toxicity is expected. Pharmacodynamic evaluations should be considered especially in a subset of patients closest to the recommended dose; an attempt should be made to validate surrogate tissues to enable inclusion for all patients. Schedule and or dose should be formally explored for e.g. with a randomised or an adaptive design. Data and knowledge sharing was strongly recommended, including the creation of formal or informal consortia of laboratories with individual expertise in pathway or target based models, collaboration between companies to ensure that agents which are 'best in class' are combined, and the development of databases which will be able to inform the development of future recommendations/guidelines., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Sorafenib is active in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Clinical Trials Group initiated a phase I/II study of the combination of sorafenib with cytarabine in older patients with AML or high-risk MDS who were unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. FLT3 mutational status was determined in all patients. Twenty-one patients were enrolled (four MDS, 17 AML) with a median age of 77 years. The recommended phase II dose (RP2D) was cytarabine 10 mg bid days 1-10 and sorafenib 600 mg/day days 2-28. Dose-limiting toxicities were fatigue, sepsis and skin rash. Of 15 evaluable patients treated at the RP2D, two patients responded. The overall response rate for eligible patients was 10%. FLT3 mutations were found in only three patients. We conclude that this combination of sorafenib and cytarabine has limited activity in this unselected cohort of elderly patients with AML/MDS in which FLT3 mutations seemed underrepresented.

Purpose: We report a multicenter phase II study of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM), evaluating the efficacy, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), immunogenicity, and biomarker profile of interleukin-21 (IL-21)., Patients and Methods: Patients with no prior systemic therapy and with limited-disease MM were treated with IL-21 by using three different dosing regimens. Cohort 1 received 50 μg/kg per day by outpatient intravenous bolus injection for 5 days of each week during weeks 1, 3, and 5 of an 8-week cycle. Cohort 2 received 30 μg/kg per day on the same schedule, and cohort 3 received 50 μg/kg per day for 5 days of each week during weeks 1 and 3 of a 6-week cycle., Results: Forty patients were enrolled: three in cohort 1, 30 in cohort 2, and seven in cohort 3. Two patients in cohort 1 and four in cohort 3 had dose-limiting toxicities; all other patients were treated with a dose of 30 μg/kg per day. Common adverse events were fatigue, rash, diarrhea, nausea, and myalgia. Overall response rate (ORR) was 22.5%, with nine confirmed partial responses (median response duration, 5.3 months); 16 had stable disease (median response duration, 5.3 months). ORR did not appear to depended on IL-21 receptor expression or BRAF mutation status. The median PFS was 4.3 months and median overall survival (OS) was 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.09 to 17.81 months)., Conclusion: The ORR to IL-21 is 22.5% for first-line MM and warrants further investigation. The favorable PFS and OS suggest that this is an active agent in comparison to both historical NCIC Clinical Trials Group data and data from meta-analysis of Cooperative Group phase II trials.

There has been a significant shift within oncology drug development away from empiric screening of cytotoxic compounds to the era of genomics and molecularly targeted agents. The drug development process is evolving with greater emphasis on proof-of-mechanism studies in both preclinical and early clinical development. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) Task Force, established as a forum for academic and pharmaceutical leaders to discuss methodological issues in targeted anticancer therapy development, met in March 2010 to review what were the minimal data required to make appropriate decisions about moving new targeted cancer agents from late preclinical development into phase I and from phase I into phase II trials. A number of specific questions were posed, and responses to each developed through survey, literature review and discussion at the face to face meeting of the MDICT Task Force. Consensus emerged around the necessity to demonstrate proof-of-mechanism and obtain information on key pharmacokinetic aspects of drug behaviour in late preclinical and early clinical trials. However, controversy remains on the extent of in vivo anti-tumour efficacy required to support clinical development of targeted agents. A systematic review of the data in this area would be informative. Further, while objective response in phase I trials may be a favourable signal about the potential activity of a new agent, debate exists around the weight that should be placed on the observation of stable disease or functional imaging changes in driving drug development decisions in the absence of observing either responses or convincing pharmacodynamic data in phase I. MDICT made a number of recommendations that may aid in future development of targeted agents., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a tumor suppressor gene, and loss of function mutations are common and appear to be important in the pathogenesis of endometrial carcinomas. Loss of PTEN causes deregulated phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/serine-threonine kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/Akt/mTOR) signaling which may provide neoplastic cells with a selective survival advantage by enhancing angiogenesis, protein translation, and cell cycle progression. Temsirolimus, an ester derivative of rapamycin that inhibits mTOR, was evaluated in this setting., Patients and Methods: Sequential phase II studies evaluated single-agent activity of temsirolimus in women with recurrent or metastatic chemotherapy-naive or chemotherapy-treated endometrial cancer. Temsirolimus 25 mg intravenously was administered weekly in 4-week cycles., Results: In the chemotherapy-naive group, 33 patients received a median of four cycles (range, one to 23 cycles). Of the 29 patients evaluable for response, four (14%) had an independently confirmed partial response and 20 (69%) had stable disease as best response, with a median duration of 5.1 months (range, 3.7 to 18.4 months) and 9.7 months (range, 2.1 to 14.6 months). Only five patients (18%) had progressive disease. In the chemotherapy-treated group, 27 patients received a median of three cycles (range, one to six cycles). Of the 25 patients evaluable for response, one (4%) had an independently confirmed partial response, and 12 patients (48%) had stable disease, with a median duration of 4.3 months (range, 3.6 to 4.9 months) and 3.7 months (range, 2.4 to 23.2 months). PTEN loss (immunohistochemistry and mutational analysis) and molecular markers of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway did not correlate with the clinical outcome., Conclusion: mTOR inhibition with temsirolimus has encouraging single-agent activity in endometrial cancer which is higher in chemotherapy-naive patients than in chemotherapy-treated patients and is independent of PTEN status. The difference in activity according to prior therapy should be factored into future clinical trial designs.

There are limited effective therapies for most patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We conducted a phase II trial of the multi-targeted vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) kinase inhibitor, sunitinib, 37.5 mg given orally once daily in adult patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL. Of 19 enrolled patients, 17 eligible patients were evaluable for toxicity and 15 for response. No objective responses were seen and nine patients achieved stable disease (median duration 3.4 months). As a result, the study was closed at the end of the first stage. Grades 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in 29% and 35%, respectively. There was no relationship between change in circulating endothelial cell numbers (CECs) and bidimensional tumor burden over time. Despite some activity in solid tumors, sunitinib showed no evidence of response in relapsed/refractory DLBCL and had greater than expected hematologic toxicity.

Purpose: To determine the clinical activity of OGX-011, an antisense inhibitor of clusterin, in combination with docetaxel/prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive docetaxel/prednisone either with (arm A) or without (arm B) OGX-011 640 mg intravenously weekly. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥ 50% from baseline, with the experimental therapy being considered of interest if the proportion of patients with a PSA decline was more than 60%. Secondary end points were objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and changes in serum clusterin., Results: Eighty-two patients were accrued, 41 to each arm. OGX-011 adverse effects included rigors and fevers. After cycle 1, median serum clusterin decreased by 26% in arm A and increased by 0.9% in arm B (P < .001). PSA declined by ≥ 50% in 58% of patients in arm A and 54% in arm B. Partial response occurred in 19% and 25% of patients in arms A and B, respectively. Median PFS and OS times were 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 8.8 months) and 23.8 months (95% CI, 16.2 months to not reached), respectively, in arm A and 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.6 months) and 16.9 months (95% CI, 12.8 to 25.8 months), respectively, in arm B. Baseline factors associated with improved OS on exploratory multivariate analysis were an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.51), presence of bone or lymph node metastases only (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.79), and treatment assignment to OGX-011 (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.87)., Conclusion: Treatment with OGX-011 and docetaxel was well tolerated with evidence of biologic effect and was associated with improved survival. Further evaluation is warranted.

Aim: The impact of PTEN status and microsatellite instability (MSI) on the prognosis of women with endometrial cancer is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate MSI and PTEN expression in two patient populations using data from NCIC CTG studies., Methods: Archival paraffin embedded tumour from women with endometrial cancer enrolled in NCIC CTG studies: EN5 (stage I/II) and IND 126, 148 and 160 (advanced/recurrent disease) were examined for MSI using BAT25/26 and for PTEN expression using immunohistochemistry. PTEN and MSI status were correlated with clinicopathologic variables and survival using data from NCIC CTG trial databases., Results: PTEN and MSI results were available from 128 and 163 patients, respectively. MSI+ tumours were more common in women enrolled in EN5 compared to the IND studies (p=0.01). PTEN negative tumours were associated with improved survival in both univariate (hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.94; p=0.03) and multivariate (adjusted HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.96; p=0.03) analyses in women enrolled in IND studies. Microsatellite stable tumours were associated with an improved prognosis in univariate (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06-0.51; p<0.0001) and multivariate (adjusted HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.5; p<0.0001) analyses in women enrolled in EN5. There was no significant correlation between MSI and PTEN status., Conclusions: PTEN negative tumours in women with advanced disease are associated with improved survival. MSI+ tumours are more common in early stage disease and in this group of women are associated with a worse prognosis., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Vascular endothethial growth factor (VEGF) and stem cell factor (c-KIT) signaling may play a role in the development and progression of cervical carcinoma. Sunitinib malate is an oral, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits receptors for VEGF, c-Kit and platelet-derived growth factor. This multi-centre phase II study was performed to evaluate the activity of sunitinib in women with locally advanced or metastatic cervical carcinoma who had received up to one prior line of chemotherapy for advanced disease., Methods: Sunitinib, 50 mg/day, was administered in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on followed by 2 weeks off treatment). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate., Results: Sixteen (84%) of 19 patients enrolled had stable disease (median duration 4.4 months, 2.3-17 months), but no objective response was observed. Median time to progression was 3.5 months (range, 2.7-7.0 months). Four patients had fistulae develop on study treatment and an additional patient developed a fistula 3.5 months after discontinuation of therapy. All five patients had received either prior chemoradiation or radiation., Conclusions: A higher rate of fistula formation (26.3%) was observed than would be expected and is of concern. Sunitinib has insufficient activity as a single agent in cervical cancer to warrant further investigation., (Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical benefit (CB) was first successfully used as an end-point in 1997 in the pivotal study of gemcitabine in advanced pancreas cancer. In the trial by Burris et al. CB was a composite measure of pain, performance status and weight. Here we describe how CB has been used in oncology trials since that time., Methods: We performed an electronic search (www.jco.org) for reports of all clinical trials (phase I, II and III) published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology 1997-2008 citing 'clinical benefit'. Eligible trials were those reporting clinical benefit as an end-point. Details related to study methodology, sponsorship and end-points were abstracted. Use of CB was classified as patient centred if it referred to improvement in the clinical parameters used by Burris et al. or in other disease-related symptoms. CB was classified as tumour centred if it related to objective tumour criteria for partial/complete response and/or stable disease. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise findings and the chi-square test was used to compare proportions., Results: Seventy-one trials reporting CB as an end-point were identified: 37 in breast, 8 in pancreas and 26 in other cancers. The definition of CB was patient centred in 20 trials (28%) and tumour centred in 51 trials (72%). Only 20% (14/71) of trials (including all 8 pancreas studies) used the original Burris definition. Among the 71 trials reporting clinical benefit, in only 31 (44%) cases was the end-point defined as a primary or secondary study objective. Trials with a patient-centred definition of CB were considerably more likely to do so than trials with a tumour-centred definition (19/20, 95% versus 12/51, 24%, p<0.0001). Study variables associated with the use of a tumour-centred definition include: disease site (breast 35/37, 95%; all others 16/34, 47%, p<0.001) and intervention (hormone or targeted agent 38/40, 95%; chemotherapy 13/31, 42%, p<0.001). There has been a steady increase in the number of trials using CB as an end-point; in the second half of the study period the number of trials increased from 17 to 54, along with the proportion of trials with a tumour-centred definition (10/17, 59% to 41/54, 76%, p=0.09)., Conclusions: Despite its initial definition, clinical benefit is often used to describe objective tumour findings. Clinical trials should use end-points in a consistent manner to enable clear communication between investigators, clinicians and patients about the benefit of novel therapies.

Purpose: Clusterin is an antiapoptotic protein activated in response to cellular stress. OGX-011 is a second-generation antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits clusterin expression. The primary objective of this phase II trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of the combination of OGX-011 and docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer., Experimental Design: Women with measurable metastatic breast cancer and or=55%. Objective response in >or=6 of the first 14 patients was required for the trial to continue to the second stage., Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled. A median of six cycles were delivered (range, 2-10). Five partial responses were confirmed for a 33% response rate (95% confidence interval, 11.8-61.6%) with a further 9 (60%) patients showing stable disease. The median duration of stable disease was 9.3 months. The median time to progression was 8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.62-9.43 months). Toxic effects were similar to those with single agent docetaxel. Although serum clusterin decreased on treatment, there was no relationship observed between the magnitude of decrease and response., Conclusion: The combination of OGX-011 and docetaxel at 75 mg/m(2) is well tolerated and clinical activity was seen in these patients with metastatic breast cancer, but there was an insufficient number of responses to meet the criteria for proceeding to the second stage of accrual.

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression is common in endometrial cancers and may have a major role in tumor growth and progression. Erlotinib is an orally active, selective inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine kinase activity., Patients and Methods: A multinomial design two-stage phase II study was performed to evaluate single-agent activity of erlotinib in women with advanced endometrial cancer with recurrent or metastatic disease who were chemotherapy naïve and had received up to one line of prior hormonal therapy. Erlotinib was administered at daily dose of 150 mg. Archival tumor tissue was analyzed for EGFR expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Mutational status of EGFR was determined in responders., Results: Thirty-two of 34 entered patients are assessable for response. Treatment was well tolerated and severe toxicity infrequent, with the only grade 4 toxicity being an elevation of transaminases (AST). There were four confirmed partial responses (PRs; 12.5%; 95% CI, 3.5% to 29%) lasting 2 to 36 months. Fifteen patients had stable disease (SD), with median duration of 3.7 months (range, 2 to 12 months). EGFR expression was analyzed in thirty patients; 19 were positive, nine were negative, and two were not assessable. Of the 19 patients who were EGFR positive, three had PR (16%), seven SD, and eight progressive disease, and one was not assessable. No mutations were identified in responders. FISH showed no correlation of response with gene amplification., Conclusion: Erlotinib is well tolerated with an overall objective response rate of 12.5%. Molecular analysis did not identify EGFR mutations in responders or correlation of response with gene amplification.

To assess the response rate and toxicity of the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor, ispinesib, in malignant melanoma. Seventeen patients were enrolled from April to November 2005. Ispinesib was administered as a 1-hour infusion at a dose of 18 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks until disease progression. No objective responses were seen. Six patients (35%) had a best response of stable disease for a median duration of 2.8 months. Disease progression was documented in 9 (53%) after 1 or 2 cycles. Eighty-eight percent of patients received > or =90% of planned dose intensity. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included dizziness (1) and blurred vision (1). There was one episode of febrile neutropenia, but no grade 3 or 4 biochemical adverse events. Pharmacokinetics was consistent with prior studies. KSP immunoreactivity was seen in 14 of 16 available archival tissue samples (88%). Ispinesib can be safely administered using the dose and schedule employed, with mild hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity. No objective responses were observed, and further development of single-agent ispinesib in malignant melanoma is not recommended. Although KSP expression appears to be common in melanoma, KSP may not be a suitable target for its treatment.

Purpose: Because the appropriate design and end points for phase II evaluation of targeted anticancer agents are unclear, we undertook a review of recent reports of phase II trials of targeted agents to determine the types of designs used, the planned end points, the outcomes, and the relationship between trial outcomes and regulatory approval., Methods: We retrieved reports of single-agent phase II trials in six solid tumors for 19 targeted drugs. For each, we abstracted data regarding planned design and actual results. Response rates were examined for any relationship to eventual success of the agents, as determined by US Food and Drug Administration approval for at least one indication., Results: Eighty-nine trials were identified. Objective response was the primary or coprimary end point in the majority of trials (61 of 89 trials). Fourteen reports were of randomized studies generally evaluating different doses of agents, not as controlled experiments. Enrichment for target expression was uncommon. Objective responses were seen in 38 trials; in 19 trials, response rates were more than 10%, and in eight, they were more than 20%. Agents with high response rates tended to have high nonprogression rates; renal cell carcinoma was the exception to this. Higher overall response rates were predictive of regulatory approval in the tumor types reviewed (P = .005)., Conclusion: In practice, phase II design for targeted agents is similar to that for cytotoxics. Objective response seems to be a useful end point for screening new targeted agents because, in our review, its observation predicted for eventual success. Improvements in design are recommended, as is more frequent inclusion of biological questions as part of phase II trials.

Purpose: Objective tumor response rates observed in phase II trials for metastatic melanoma have historically not provided a reliable indicator of meaningful survival benefits. To facilitate using overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) as an endpoint for future phase II trials, we evaluated historical data from cooperative group phase II trials to attempt to develop benchmarks for OS and PFS as reference points for future phase II trials., Patients and Methods: Individual-level and trial-level data were obtained for patients enrolled onto 42 phase II trials (70 trial arms) that completed accrual in the years 1975 through 2005 and conducted by Southwest Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, and the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic variables, and between-trial(-arm) variability in 1-year OS rates and 6-month PFS rates were examined., Results: Statistically significant individual-level and trial-level prognostic factors found in a multivariate survival analysis for OS were performance status, presence of visceral disease, sex, and whether the trial excluded patients with brain metastases. Performance status, sex, and age were statistically significant prognostic factors for PFS. Controlling for these prognostic variables essentially eliminated between-trial variability in 1-year OS rates but not in 6-month PFS rates., Conclusion: Benchmarks are provided for 1-year OS or OS curves that make use of the distribution of prognostic factors of the patients in the phase II trial. A similar benchmark for 6-month PFS is provided, but its use is more problematic because of residual between-trial variation in this endpoint.

The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) task force considered aspects of the design and conduct of phase II studies for molecular targeted agents during their 2007 meeting. The task force recommended that multinomial endpoints and designs should be considered for phase II studies of targeted agents, that both single arm as well as randomised designs remain appropriate in certain settings, and that further assessment of novel endpoints (tumour growth kinetic assessment, biomarker or functional imaging) and designs (randomised discontinuation or Bayesian adaptive design) be encouraged. The MDICT cautioned on the use of small randomised trials which have a number of statistical pitfalls and dangers and strongly encouraged the complete reporting, including negative trials, in the scientific literature.

Oncology drug development has seen a paradigm shift in the past decade from traditional cytotoxic agents to molecular targeted therapies. Given the different mechanisms and toxicities of these agents, drug development methodology may also require novel approaches. To address emerging issues in oncology drug development the 'Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies' (MDICT) task force was established to provide a forum for academic leaders involved in cancer drug development to discuss methodological issues inherent to the study of targeted anticancer therapy. At the inaugural MDICT meeting in 2006, discussion focused on the most appropriate primary endpoints for first-in-man phase I studies of targeted anticancer agents and organisational issues of such studies. This report summarises the scientific reviews and discussions as well as the recommendations regarding phase I trial design formulated by the MDICT task force.

Triapine is a novel small molecule ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor that showed activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines. Evaluating new agents with novel mechanisms remains of interest for patients with incurable RCC. This was a single-arm, multicentre phase II trial where Triapine was given at a schedule of 96 mg/m2 2-h infusion daily x 4 repeated every 2 weeks in patients with recurrent RCC. A median of four cycles of Triapine was administered to 19 eligible patients. One response was seen (7%.) Median time to progression was 3.6 months. Common adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2, with fatigue in 74%, nausea in 68% and vomiting in 58%. However grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 79% and acute reactions of hypoxia, hypotension, methemoglobinemia were seen. Dose reductions/delays due to AEs were common with only 47% of patients receiving > 90% of planned dose intensity. The study closed, at the end of stage 1 as it did not meet the minimal efficacy criteria to proceed. Further evaluation of Triapine at this dose and schedule in patients with advanced kidney cancer is not recommended.

Purpose: To determine the phase II dose and objective response rate of erlotinib, a selective epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC)., Patients and Methods: HNSCC patients with no prior chemotherapy and measurable disease were treated in three escalating-dose cohorts of daily continuous oral (PO) erlotinib and intermittent intravenous (IV) cisplatin given every 21 days. The recommended phase II dose (RPTD) was then evaluated in a two-stage trial with a primary end point of objective response rate., Results: A total of 51 patients were enrolled. The RPTD was identified as erlotinib 100 mg PO daily and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV every 21 days. Forty-five patients were treated at the RPTD, of which 44 and 43 were eligible for toxicity and efficacy evaluations, respectively. The intention-to-treat response rate was 21%, with one complete and eight partial responses (95% CI, 10% to 36%), and disease stabilization was achieved in 21 patients (49%; 95% CI, 33% to 65%). Median progression-free survival was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 4.8 months) and median overall survival was 7.9 (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.5) months. The combination was well tolerated, with minimal grade 3 or higher toxicity. Subgroup analysis suggested that patients who developed higher grade skin rashes during cycle 1 had better survival outcomes (P = .034)., Conclusion: This schedule of erlotinib and cisplatin has a favorable toxicity profile and has antitumor activity in HNSCC comparable to standard combination chemotherapy regimens.

Purpose. Flavopiridol is a potent cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor that has preclinical activity in many tumours. This synthetic flavonoid was tested in a phase II nonrandomized, nonblinded multicentre clinical trial to determine its activity and toxicity in patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma. Methods. A total of 18 patients with histologically confirmed nonoperable soft tissue was treated with flavopiridol administered at a dose of 50 mg/m(2) IV over 1 hour daily x3 days every 3 weeks. Results. Eighteen patients were accrued to the study over a period of 6 months. No objective responses were noted in the seventeen evaluable patients. Eight patients (47%) exhibited stable disease after 2 cycles (median duration of 4.3 months (range 1.4-6.9 months). Kaplan-Meier estimates for 3- and 6-month progression-free survivial rates were 44 percent and 22 percent, respectively. The only grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (N = 2), nausea (N = 2), gastritis (N = 1), and fatigue (N = 1). Ninety-four percent of patients received >/= 90% of the planned dose intensity, during 55 treatment cycles. Conclusions. Flavopiridol was well tolerated at the dose and schedule used in this study, however, no objective treatment responses were seen and thus our results do not support further exploration of flavopiridol as a monotherapy at this dose and schedule in soft tissue sarcomas.

We studied the activity of T138067-sodium in patients with malignant gliomas. T138067-sodium is a unique new chemotherapy agent that inhibits microtubule formation by binding irreversibly and specifically to beta(1), beta(2)and beta(4) isotypes of 3-tubulin, causing cell arrest at G(2)/M and inducing apoptosis. Patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme were treated intravenously with 330 mg/m(2) of T138067-sodium weekly. Treatment was continued until the patient experienced either unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. Patients had to have histologically proven glioma, have bidimensionally measurable disease at least 1 cm x 1 cm, and have received no more than one prior adjuvant chemotherapy. No chemotherapy or radiotherapy for recurrent disease was permitted. Nineteen patients entered the trial. One patient was found to be ineligible. There were two patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and 16 with glioblastoma multiforme. Only two patients had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. The first seven patients had full pharmacokinetic sampling. No dose-limiting toxicity was seen, and pharmacokinetic results were consistent with those from nonglioma patients. The most common drug-related effects were fatigue (33%), nausea (28%), neutropenia (28%), and anorexia (17%). No patients stopped the study because of toxicity. No responses were seen in the 15 eligible patients who completed at least one cycle. Three patients had stable disease with a median duration of 2.6 months. Our results suggest that given in this dose and schedule T138067-sodium does not have activity in this population of anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme.

Purpose: Liposomal lurtotecan (OSI-211) is a liposomal formulation of the water-soluble topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan (GI147211), which demonstrated superior levels of activity compared with topotecan in preclinical models. We studied two schedules of OSI-211 in a randomized design in relapsed ovarian cancer to identify the more promising of the two schedules for further study., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had measurable epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer that was recurrent after one or two prior regimens of chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either arm A (OSI-211 1.8 mg/m(2)/d administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3 every 3 weeks) or arm B (OSI-211 2.4 mg/m(2)/d administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks). The primary outcome measure was objective response, which was confirmed by independent radiologic review, and a pick the winner statistical design was used to identify the schedule most likely to be superior., Results: Eighty-one patients were randomized between October 2000 and September 2001. The hematologic toxic effects were greater on arm A than on arm B (grade 4 neutropenia, 51% v 22%, respectively), as was febrile neutropenia (26% v 2.4%, respectively). Of the 80 eligible patients, eight patients (10%) had objective responses; six responders (15.4%; 95% CI, 6% to 30%) were in arm A and two responders (4.9%; 95% CI, 1% to 17%) were in arm B., Conclusion: The OSI-211 daily for 3 days intravenous schedule met the statistical criteria to be declared the winner in terms of objective response. This schedule was also associated with more myelosuppression than the schedule of OSI-211 administered in arm B.