Search

Benford's Law describes the finding that the distribution of leading (or leftmost) digits of innumerable datasets follows a well-defined logarithmic trend, rather than an intuitive uniformity. In practice this means that the most common leading digit is 1, with an expected frequency of 30.1%, and the least common is 9, with an expected frequency of 4.6%. Currently, the most common application of Benford's Law is in detecting number invention and tampering such as found in accounting-, tax-, and voter-fraud. We demonstrate that answers to end-of-chapter exercises in physics and chemistry textbooks conform to Benford's Law. Subsequently, we investigate whether this fact can be used to gain advantage over random guessing in multiple-choice tests, and find that while testbank answers in introductory physics closely conform to Benford's Law, the testbank is nonetheless secure against such a Benford's attack for banal reasons.

In Experiment 1, golden hamsters were injected with either 0.9% saline or the nausea-inducing agent, lithium chloride (LiCL), immediately after consuming a flavored diet that was either novel or familiar. The LiCl-induced aversion was strong in hamsters for which the flavored diet was novel, but no significant aversion was observed in hamsters that were familiar with the flavored diet. In Experiment 2, the strength of the LiCl-induced aversion was related inversely to the amount of conditioned-stimulus (CS) preexposure and directly to the duration of the preexposure-conditioning interval. Thus, although some previous researchers have suggested that hamsters may not demonstrate the CS-preexposure effect in a conditioned taste-aversion paradigm, they clearly did so under the conditions of the present experiments, and moreover, the characteristics of the CS-preexposure effect in hamsters were generally similar to those observed in rats.

In experimental conditions, golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) avidly consume ethanol solutions. However, they are relatively resistant to the deleterious effects of ethanol even after months of continuous consumption, apparently because they metabolize ethanol rapidly and efficiently. Male hamsters with ad libitum access to food and water were presented with isocaloric solutions [weight/weight (wt./wt.)] of 10% ethanol and 17.75% glucose for 40-min periods on alternate days. When hamsters were injected with 0.9% saline before solution presentation the mean intake of ethanol solution (0.55 g) was about half that of glucose solution (1.08 g). Hamsters derived a mean of 0.36 g/kg/40 min of absolute ethanol from the ethanol solution, an amount that does not seem to exceed their metabolic capacity for ethanol. An intraperitoneal injection of a 2.0-microg/kg dose of the C-terminal octapeptide of cholecystokinin (CCK-8) reduced intakes of both solutions by >50% if administered 5 min before solution presentation, but it was ineffectual if administered 45 min before presentation. When citric acid (2.5 g/l) was added to the glucose solution the baseline intakes of the two solutions were virtually equivalent, and when CCK-8 was administered over a range of doses (0.5-2.0 microg/kg) the intakes of the solutions did not differ significantly at any dose, supporting the suggestion that the pharmacological properties of ethanol play little or no role in mediating the consumption-inhibiting effect of exogenously administered cholecystokinin (CCK). Prior administration of lorglumide, a selective CCK type A receptor antagonist, completely attenuated the inhibitory effect of CCK-8. Findings are consistent with the notion that endogenous CCK plays a key role in the short-term control of ethanol intake in hamsters.

Although animals generally prefer to eat foods with familiar rather than unfamiliar flavors, adult golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) were found to do the opposite. After having prolonged exposure to a food with a particular flavor, hamsters were allowed to select between the food with the familiar flavor and the same food with a novel flavor. Hamsters consistently ate more of the food with the novel flavor, and this preference was long-lasting and resistant to extinction. Furthermore, the novelty effect was robust, being manifested in both sexes and under a variety of experimental circumstances. In contrast, rats tested under identical conditions consistently preferred the food with the familiar flavor. The origins of the novelty effect in hamsters remain to be determined.