Search

Minimally invasive cancer detection using bio-fluids has been actively pursued due to practical limitations, though there are better suited noninvasive and online in vivo methods. Saliva is one such clinically informative bio-fluid that offers the advantages of easy and multiple sample collection. Despite its potential in cancer diagnostics, saliva analysis is challenging due to its heterogeneous composition. Recently, there has been an upsurge in saliva exploration using optical techniques. Forms of saliva such as precipitate and supernatant have been monitored, but this sampling method needs to be standardized due to the obvious loss of analytes in processing. In that context, present work details the comparison of four different saliva sampling methodologies, i.e., air-dried, lyophilized, pellet, and supernatant using Raman spectroscopy collected from 10 healthy samples. Composition-driven spectral features of all forms were compared and classified using principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis. Analysis was carried out on all four groups in the first step. In the second step, groups of pellet and supernatant , and air-dried and lyophilized were analyzed. Findings suggest that pellet and supernatant exhibit discrete spectroscopic features and demonstrate high classification efficiency, which is indicative of their distinctive biochemical composition. On the other hand, air-dried and lyophilized forms showed overlapping spectral features and low classification, suggesting these forms retain majority spectroscopic features of whole saliva and are less prone to sampling losses. Thus, this study indicates air-dried and lyophilized forms may be more appropriate for saliva sampling using Raman spectroscopy providing the comprehensive information required for cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, the method was also tested for the classification of oral cancer and healthy subjects ( n  = 27) which yielded 90% stratification. The findings of the study indicate the utility of minimally invasive salivary Raman-based diagnostics in oral cancers.

Diselenodipropionic acid (DSePA), a pharmacologically important derivative of selenocystine was evaluated for acute toxicity, mutagenic safety and metabolic stability. The estimated median oral lethal dose (LD 50 ) cut-off of DSePA in mice and rat models was ∼200 mg/kg and ∼25 mg/kg respectively, which is considerably higher than the reported oral LD 50 dose of its parent compound. Subsequently DSePA treatment in absence and presence of rat liver S9 fraction was found to be non-mutagenic at the tested doses up to 1 mM in rifampicin resistance assay and up to 6 mM in Ames test. In vitro degradation studies indicated that DSePA was more stable in S9 fraction of human compared to rat. The kinetic parameters K m and V max of DSePA degradation estimated using rat S9 fraction was 9.81 μM and 1.06 nmol/ml/min respectively. Further, DSePA treatment (1-50 μM) with or without rat S9 fraction did not induce any toxicity in human intestinal epithelial cells (Int 407) while showing comparable bioactivity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx) level. In conclusion, superior metabolic stability of DSePA in human S9 fraction with a concomitant lack of mutagenic effects suggests that it may be a suitable derivative of selenocytine for future biological studies., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)