1. How COVID-19 changed clinical research strategies: a global survey.
- Author
-
Bauer A, Eskat A, Ntekim A, Wong C, Eberle D, Hedayati E, Tay F, Yau H, Stockley L, de Medina Redondo M, Şen S, Egert-Schwender S, Üresin Y, and Grossmann R
- Subjects
- Adaptation, Psychological, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Pandemics prevention & control, Surveys and Questionnaires, COVID-19 epidemiology
- Abstract
Objective: Clinical research has faced new challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to excessive operational demands affecting all stakeholders. We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on clinical research strategies and compared different adaptations by regulatory bodies and academic research institutions in a global context, exploring what can be learned for possible future pandemics., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey and identified and assessed different COVID-19-specific adaptation strategies used by academic research institutions and regulatory bodies., Results: All 19 participating academic research institutions developed and followed similar strategies, including preventive measures, manpower recruitment, and prioritisation of COVID-19 projects. In contrast, measures for centralised management or coordination of COVID-19 projects, project preselection, and funding were handled differently amongst institutions. Regulatory bodies responded similarly to the pandemic by implementing fast-track authorisation procedures for COVID-19 projects and developing guidance documents. Quality and consistency of the information and advice provided was rated differently amongst institutions., Conclusion: Both academic research institutions and regulatory bodies worldwide were able to cope with challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic by developing similar strategies. We identified some unique approaches to ensure fast and efficient responses to a pandemic. Ethical concerns should be addressed in any new decision-making process.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF