Search

Competing Interests: Disclosures The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Aortic valve disease is common, and valve-preserving operations are preferred whenever possible. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement has become an important tool for managing aortic root pathology in children and adults. The learning curve for this operation is challenging, but with increasing experience and technical modifications, early and late outcomes continue to improve. Durable long-term results vary based on the underlying anatomy, pathology, and patient selection, as well as surgeon expertise. The first installment of this Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement State-of-the-Art Review article addresses patient anatomy and physiology as it relates to candidacy for VSRR., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aortic valve disease is common, and valve-preserving operations are preferred whenever possible. Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) has become an important tool for managing aortic root pathology in children and adults. The learning curve for this operation is challenging, but with increasing experience and technical modifications, early and late outcomes continue to improve. Durable long term results vary based on underlying anatomy, pathology, and patient selection, as well as surgeon expertise. Part II of this VSRR State-of-the-Art Review article provides technical pearls related to VSRR., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: None.

Background: Several studies suggest an "obesity paradox," associating obesity with better cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) or aortic stenosis (AS) compared to normal or underweight individuals. This study explores the impact of body mass index (BMI) on diabetic patients with AS., Methods: Between 2014 and 2019, patients with DM who underwent echocardiography were analyzed. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular death. Patients were categorized as underweight, normal weight, or obese based on BMI (<18.5, 18.5 to 27, and >27 kg/m2, respectively)., Results: Among 74,835 DM patients, 734 had AS. Normal weight comprised 65.5% (n=481), underweight 4.1% (N=30), and 30.4% were obese. Over a 6-year follow-up, underweight patients had significantly higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.22 - 3.14, p = 0.005), while obese patients had significantly lower mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 - 0.91, p=0.001) compared to the normal group. Regarding etiologies, underweight patients had a higher risk of non-cardiovascular death (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.44-4.25, p = 0.001), while obese patients had a lower risk of cardiovascular death (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.86, p=0.003). Subgroup analysis showed a consistent trend without significant interaction., Conclusions: BMI significantly impacts mortality in DM patients with AS. Being underweight is associated with worse non-cardiovascular death, while obesity is linked to improved cardiovascular death outcomes.

Closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) reduces the rates of TIA/stroke in patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) but its role in patients in sinus rhythm who undergo mitral valve repair (MV) for leaflet prolapse remains unknown. This study examined the effects of closing the LAA in TIA/stroke after MV repair. Our database on patients who had MV repair for leaflet prolapse from 2000 through 2019 was reviewed. After excluding patients at higher risk of TIA/stroke, 1050 patients in sinus rhythm were entered into the study: 781 with open LAA and 269 with surgically closed LAA. Using a propensity score analysis to compensate from clinical differences, 267 pairs of patients with open and closed LAA were matched. Follow-up was truncated at 5 years because routine closure of the LAA was performed only during recent years. The cumulative incidence of TIA/stroke at 5 years in the entire cohort was 2.7% [95% CI 1.9, 4.0]; it was 2.9% [95% CI 1.9, 4.4] in patients with open LAA,and 1.8% [95% CI 0.7, 4.9] in patients with closed LAA (P = 0.53). In the matched cohorts, the cumulative incidences of TIA/stroke did not differ significantly (match-adjusted HR [95% CI] = 0.80 [0.21, 2.98], P = 0.74), and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis also confirmed no difference in the risk of TIA/stroke between the 2 groups (regression-adjusted HR [95% CI] = 0.58 [0.12, 2.9], P = 0.47). This study failed to show a reduction in the risk of TIA/stroke by closing the LAA in patients in sinus rhythm (Figure 6). Closure of the LAA during MV repair warrants a larger and more rigorous study., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To review the pathology of the mitral valve (MV) and long-term outcomes of surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS)., Patients and Methods: From 1988 through 2020, 60 patients with MFS had surgery to correct mitral regurgitation (MR): 19 had isolated MV surgery, 32 had combined MV and aortic root surgery, and 9 had MV surgery after aortic root surgery. Follow-up was complete for a median of 16.1 years., Results: MV pathology was myxomatous degeneration in all patients and of advanced degree in 78.6% with bileaflet prolapse in 65.5%, mitral annulus disjunction in 57.5%, and mitral annulus calcification in 8.2% of patients. The MV was repaired in 47 patients and replaced in 13. Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative mortality at 20 years 21.3% for all patients, 6.7% after MV repair, and 57.8% after replacement (P < .001). MV reoperations were performed in 5 patients: 2 after repair and 3 after replacement. The cumulative incidence rate of reoperations on the MV was 3.8% at 10 years and 11.0% at 20 years in the entire cohort. Among 47 patients who had MV repair, moderate MR developed in 11 patients and severe in 2. Both patients with severe MR underwent MV reoperation. The cumulative incidence rate of recurrent moderate or severe MR after MV repair was 20.4% at 10 years, and 36.5% at 20 years., Conclusions: MV repair was associated with better survival than MV replacement, but recurrent MR after repair occurred in approximately one-third of the patients at 20 years after surgery., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To examine the late outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement and concomitant mitral valve repair in patients who have been followed prospectively for more than 2 decades., Methods: From 1992 to 2020, 54 consecutive patients (mean age, 47 ± 16 years; 80% men) underwent valve-sparing root replacement (45 reimplantation and 9 remodeling) with concomitant repair of the mitral valve. Patients were followed prospectively for a median of 9 years (IQR, 3-14 years)., Results: No patient experienced perioperative death or stroke. There were 3 late deaths and the 15-year overall survival was 96.0% (95% CI, 74.8%-99.4%), similar to the age- and sex-matched population. Over the follow-up period, 6 patients had reoperation of the aortic valve and 3 on the mitral valve. Of those, 2 had reoperation on both aortic and mitral valves for a total of 7 reoperations in this cohort. The cumulative proportion of reoperation at 10 years of either or both valves were as follows: aortic valve 11.4% (95% CI, 3.9%-33.3%), mitral valve 4.2% (95% CI, 0.6%-28.4%), and both valves 11.4% (95% CI, 3.9%-33.3%). The estimated probability of developing moderate/severe aortic insufficiency at 15 years was 18.5% (95% CI, 9.0%-34.2%). On final echocardiographic follow-up, none of the patients had developed moderate/severe mitral regurgitation., Conclusions: In this single-center series of concomitant valve-sparing root replacement and mitral valve repair, we observed excellent clinical outcomes with a low risk of death or valve-related complications. Continued surveillance of late valve function is necessary., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement Dr Ouzounian has consulting agreements with Terumo, Cryolife, Edwards, and Medtronic. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aortic valve-sparing operations were developed >3 decades ago and have become part of the surgical armamentarium to treat patients with aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysms. Although remodeling of the aortic root is physiologically sounder than reimplantation of the aortic valve, most surgeons seem to prefer the latter. This review summarizes the views of one of the pioneers of aortic valve-sparing operation and includes their development, the various modifications that occurred over the years, comparative outcomes with aortic root replacement with valved conduits, outcomes from several recently reported series, and the future directions. The author argues that comparisons between aortic valve-sparing operations and aortic root replacement with valved conduits based on retrospective studies are inappropriate because these 2 types of surgery are performed in patients with different aortic valve pathology. Late outcomes after aortic valve-sparing operations have not been consistent among various reports and raise the question of surgical expertise and patients' selection. Aortic valve-sparing operations are the best treatment for young patients with aortic root aneurysm and normal aortic cusps. Further studies are needed to define their role in the management of patients with diseased aortic cusps., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As a result of increasing adoption of imaging screening, the number of adult patients with a diagnosis of anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries (AAOCA) has grown in recent years. Existing guidelines provide a framework for management and treatment, but patients with AAOCA present with a wide range of anomalies and symptoms that make general recommendations of limited applicability. In particular, a large spectrum of interventions can be used for treatment, and there is no consensus on the optimal approach to be used. In this paper, a multidisciplinary group of clinical and interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons performed a systematic review and critical evaluation of the available evidence on the interventional treatment of AAOCA in adult patients. Using a structured Delphi process, the group agreed on expert recommendations that are intended to complement existing clinical practice guidelines., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As a result of increasing adoption of imaging screening, the number of adult patients with a diagnosis of anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries (AAOCA) has grown in recent years. Existing guidelines provide a framework for management and treatment, but patients with AAOCA present with a wide range of anomalies and symptoms that make general recommendations of limited applicability. In particular, a large spectrum of interventions can be used for treatment, and there is no consensus on the optimal approach to be used. In this paper, a multidisciplinary group of clinical and interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons performed a systematic review and critical evaluation of the available evidence on the interventional treatment of AAOCA in adult patients. Using a structured Delphi process, the group agreed on expert recommendations that are intended to complement existing clinical practice guidelines., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Di Franco has served as a consultant for Novo Nordisk and Servier; and has served as an advisory board member for Scharper. Dr Gräni has received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation, InnoSuisse, the GAMBIT foundation, and the CAIM foundation, outside of the submitted work. Dr Weinsaft has received speaker fees from GE Healthcare; and has served as a consultant for Bitterroot Bio. Dr Zimpfer has served as an advisor and advisory board member for Medtronic, Abbott, Berlin Heart, Abiomed, Fineheart, and Corewave; has served on the Speakers Bureau for Medtronic, Abbott, Berlin Heart, Abiomed, Corzym, and Edwards Lifesciences; and has received research grants and travel support from Medtronic, Abbott, Berlin Heart, Abiomed, Corzym, and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The usefulness of aortic valve sparing operations to treat aortic root aneurysm in patients with Marfan syndrome (MS) remains controversial., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with MS who have undergone valve-preserving aortic root replacement., Methods: Patients with MS who had aortic valve sparing operations (reimplantation of the aortic valve or remodeling of the aortic root) from 1988 through 2019 were followed prospectively for a median of 14 years. Pertinent data from clinical, echocardiographic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance images of the aorta were collected and analyzed., Results: There were 189 patients whose mean age was 36 years, and 67% were men. Ten patients presented with acute type A dissection and 29 had mitral regurgitation. There were 52 patients at risk at 20 years. Mortality rate at 20 years was 21.5% (95% CI: 14.7%-30.8%); advancing age and preoperative aortic dissections were associated with increased risk of death by multivariable analysis. At 20 years, the cumulative incidence of moderate or severe aortic insufficiency was 14.5% (95% CI: 9.5%-22.0%), reoperation on the aortic valve was 7.5% (95% CI: 3.9%-14.7%), and new distal aortic dissections was 19.9% (95% CI: 13.9%-28.5%). Remodeling of aortic root was associated with greater risk of developing aortic insufficiency and aortic valve reoperation than reimplantation of the aortic valve., Conclusions: Aortic valve sparing operations provide stable aortic valve function and low rates of valve-related complications during the first 2 decades of follow-up but aortic dissections remain problematic in patients with MS., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This project was funded by the Cardiovascular Fund for Excellence of Peter Munk Cardiac Centre and a generous donation from Rosalind and Nathan Brown. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aortic valve sparing operations were introduced three decades ago but controversy remains regarding its appropriateness, reproducibility and durability. This article describes the long-term outcomes of patients who had reimplantation of the aortic valve., Methods: All patients who had reimplantation of a tricuspid aortic valve at Toronto General Hospital from 1989 through 2019 were selected for this study. Patients were followed prospectively with periodical clinical assessments and imaging of the heart and aorta., Results: Four hundred and four patients were identified. The median age was 48.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 35.0-59.0] years and 310 (76.7%) were men. There were 150 patients with Marfan syndrome, 20 with Loeys-Dietz syndrome and 33 with acute or chronic aortic dissections. The median follow-up was 11.7 (IQR, 6.8-17.1) years. There were 55 patients alive and without reoperation at 20 years. The cumulative mortality at 20 years was 26.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 20.6-34.2%], the cumulative incidence of reoperation on the aortic valve was 7.0% (95% CI: 4.0-12.2%) and the development of moderate or severe aortic insufficiency was 11.8% (95% CI: 8.5-16.5%). We could not identify variables associated with reoperation on the aortic valve or with the development of aortic insufficiency. New distal aortic dissections were common in patients with associated genetic syndromes., Conclusions: Reimplantation of the aortic valve in patients with tricuspid aortic valve provides excellent aortic valve function during the first two decades of follow-up. Distal aortic dissections are relatively common in patients with associated genetic syndromes., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) has excellent outcomes when performed in experienced centers in well-selected patients. It is suggested that reimplantation of the aortic valve may have better durability than remodeling in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS), although long-term comparative data are limited., Methods: Between 1988 and 2018, 194 patients with MFS underwent VSRR at our institution. From these, we derived a propensity-matched cohort of 68 patients (44 who underwent reimplantation and 24 who had remodeling). Early outcomes included death and perioperative complications. Late outcomes were survival, probability of aortic insufficiency, and reintervention up to 20 years of follow-up. Median follow-up was 17.8 years (interquartile range, 12.0-20.6 years) for the entire matched cohort., Results: Baseline variables were similar between reimplantation and remodeling patients after matching: age (39 ± 12 vs 40 ± 13 years, P = .75) and male sex (28 [64%] vs 15 [63%], P = 1.0). Similar 20-year survival was observed after reimplantation compared with remodeling (82% vs 72%, P = .20), whereas the probability of developing greater than mild aortic insufficiency at 20 years was increased after remodeling (5.8% vs 13%, P = .013). More patients underwent reoperation on the aortic valve after a remodeling procedure than after reimplantation of the aortic valve (18% vs 0%, P = .018)., Conclusions: VSRR provides excellent long-term survival and freedom from valve-related complications outcomes in patients with MFS. Reimplantation of the aortic valve was associated with a lower risk of aortic valve reoperation and aortic insufficiency than the remodeling procedure after 2 decades of follow-up., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aortic cusp fenestrations are common in patients with aortic root aneurysm, and their management during aortic valve repair remains controversial. We believe that fenestrations in the area of the commissures may rupture after reimplantation of the aortic valve because this operation increases the mechanical stress on the cusps. For this reason we have reinforced the free margin of the aortic cusp with fenestration with fine Gore-Tex sutures (WL Gore). This study examines the outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve in patients who had cusp fenestration reinforced with Gore-Tex sutures., Methods: A review of all patients who had reimplantation of the aortic valve for aortic root aneurysm disclosed 111 patients who had at least 1 cusp fenestration reinforced with a double layer of a fine Gore-Tex suture. The outcomes of these patients were examined and compared with a group of patients without fenestration using propensity score analysis. All patients were followed prospectively with images of the heart., Results: The median follow-up was 8.3 years. Overall the cumulative incidence of aortic valve reintervention at 15 years was 4.8% and the cumulative incidence of aortic insufficiency of moderate or severe degree was 9.2%. Comparison of outcomes of patients with and without fenestrations showed similar results up to 15 years of follow-up., Conclusions: Reinforcement of the free margins of cusps with fenestrations using Gore-Tex sutures is safe and does not seem to adversely affect the durability of reimplantation of the aortic valve., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine operative and long-term results of combined aortic and mitral valve replacement when reconstruction of the fibrous skeleton of the heart is needed because of calcification, abscess, previous operations, or patient-prosthesis mismatch., Methods: From 1985 to 2020, 182 consecutive patients underwent combined aortic and mitral valve replacement with reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous skeleton in all cases and also the posterior mitral annulus in 63 patients. Bovine pericardium or Dacron grafts were used for the reconstructions. Median follow-up was 7.5 (interquartile range, 2.1-12.6) years and 98% complete., Results: Patient mean age was 62 years; 69% had 1 or more previous valve operations, and 92% were functional class III or IV. The indications for reconstruction were extensive calcification of the fibrous skeleton in 34%, abscess in 13%, tissue damage secondary to previous operations in 39%, and patient-prosthesis mismatch of the mitral valve in 13%. Bovine pericardium was used in two-thirds of cases and Dacron grafts in one-third. Operative mortality was 13.2% and postoperative complications were common. Survival at 1, 10, and 20 years was 81.8%, 51.1%, and 23.7%, respectively. Fourteen patients required reoperation and 3 transcatheter interventions. The cumulative probability of reinterventions at 1, 10, and 20 years were 3.3%, 5.8%, and 9.1%, respectively. Most patients experienced symptomatic improvement postoperatively., Conclusions: Reconstructions of the fibrous skeleton of the heart are associated with high operative mortality but the long-term results are satisfactory because most patients would not have survived without surgical intervention., (Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: During the ongoing search for an ideal patch material for reconstructive heart surgery, several versions of extracellular matrix (ECM) have been used. However, long-term performance in different cardiac positions is unknown., Methods: We performed a retrospective review of outcomes after mitral valve surgery using ECM in 29 patients from 2011 to 2014. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was reviewed (mean time, 6.3 ± 2.8 years)., Results: ECM was used to reconstruct the posterior mitral annulus in 69% and to repair the mitral leaflet in 65% of the patients. The most prevalent etiology was dystrophic calcification of the annulus (80%) versus endocarditis for leaflet repair (60%). Fifty-five percent of the patients who required annular reconstruction received a mitral valve replacement (MVR). There were 2 perioperative deaths (7%). Long-term data were analyzed according to surgical technique; namely, isolated leaflet repair compared with annular reconstruction with or without MVR. There were 3 late deaths (1 per group). Overall survival was 83% at 7 years. Ninety percent of cases with mitral valve repair with or without annular reconstruction were free from more than mild mitral regurgitation, compared with 45% in the MVR and annular reconstruction group. The mechanism of failure was patch degeneration creating a severe paravalvular leak due to prosthesis dehiscence., Conclusions: ECM used to repair the mitral valve leaflets with or without annular reconstruction offers acceptable results. However, caution should be taken with the use of ECM adjacent to prosthetic valve material because of a high rate of failure associated with patch degeneration., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Coronary reperfusion therapies have led to a reduction in the incidence of mechanical complications of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but the associated mortality of these complications has remained high. Ventricular septal rupture is the most common mechanical complication after myocardial infarction and occurs in approximately 0.21% with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and in 0.04% with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Surgery is the only definitive treatment but it is associated with high operative mortality and morbidity and, in some centers, alternative treatment with mechanical support of circulation and trans-catheter closure of the defect is being used. We continue to believe that immediate surgery offers the best opportunity for long-term survival. Patients should be taken directly to the operating room or via the heart catheterization laboratory if the coronary artery anatomy is unknown. This should be done as soon as the diagnosis is made, as acute rupture of the interventricular septum is a surgical emergency. The operative technique of infarct exclusion has been our preferred method and when performed in hemodynamically stable patients, the operative mortality is around 10%, although much higher in patients in cardiogenic shock. Patch dehiscence and persistent shunts are uncommon after closure of the defect using this technique. Delaying operative intervention in hemodynamically stable patients frequently leads to cardiogenic shock and multi-organ failure. Transcatheter closure of these acute septal lesions is complex, not necessarily feasible in all patients, and there is no evidence that the results are superior to surgery., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: The ideal aortic valve substitute for young and middle-aged adults remains elusive., Objectives: This study sought to compare the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing the Ross procedure and those receiving bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements (AVRs)., Methods: Consecutive patients aged 16-60 years who underwent a Ross procedure or surgical bioprosthetic AVR at the Toronto General Hospital between 1990 and 2014 were identified. Propensity score matching was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included valve reintervention, valve deterioration, endocarditis, thromboembolic events, and permanent pacemaker implantation., Results: Propensity score matching yielded 108 pairs of patients. The median age was 41 years (IQR: 34-47 years). Baseline characteristics were similar between the matched groups. There was no operative mortality in either group. Mean follow-up was 14.5 ± 7.2 years. All-cause mortality was lower following the Ross procedure (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14-0.90; P = 0.028). Using death as a competing risk, the Ross procedure was associated with lower rates of reintervention (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.10-0.41; P < 0.001), valve deterioration (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.14-0.45; P < 0.001), thromboembolic events (HR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.05-0.50; P = 0.002), and permanent pacemaker implantation (HR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.07-0.64; P = 0.006)., Conclusions: In this propensity-matched study, the Ross procedure was associated with better long-term survival and freedom from adverse valve-related events compared with bioprosthetic AVR. In specialized centers with sufficient expertise, the Ross procedure should be considered the primary option for young and middle-aged adults undergoing AVR., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Ouzounian is partially supported by the Antonio & Helga DeGasperis Chair in Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research at University Health Network; and has consulting agreements with Cryolife, Terumo Aortic, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the early outcomes of patients undergoing a Bentall procedure after previous cardiac surgery., Methods: From 1990 to 2014, 473 patients underwent a Bentall procedure after previous cardiac surgery with a composite valve graft at a single institution: composite valve graft with a mechanical prosthesis (n = 256) or composite valve graft with a bioprosthesis (n = 217). Patients were excluded if their index operation was less than 30 days before the reoperation. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. The secondary outcome was a composite of major morbidity and operative mortality: stroke, renal failure, prolonged mechanical ventilation, deep sternal infection, or reoperation during the same admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with the primary and secondary outcomes of interest., Results: Median age was 57 (interquartile range, 44-67) years, and 349 patients (74%) were male. Median time between index surgery and reoperation was 13 (interquartile range, 8-21) years. A total of 178 patients (38%) underwent urgent or emergency intervention, 61 patients (13%) had active endocarditis/abscess, 87 patients (19%) had left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, and 262 patients (55%) had undergone more than 1 previous operation. Previous operations (not mutually exclusive) included coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 58, 12%), aortic valve/root replacement (n = 376, 80%) or repair (n = 36, 8%), and other surgical interventions (n = 245, 52%). Ninety-six patients (20%) had undergone coronary reimplantation during the previous operation, which consisted of a Bentall procedure in 81 patients, a Ross operation in 8 patients, a valve-sparing root replacement in 4 patients, and an arterial switch in 3 patients. At the time of the reoperative Bentall, both coronary arteries were reimplanted directly in 357 patients (77%), whereas 79 patients (17%) received at least 1 interposition graft. In 26 patients (5%), at least 1 of the native coronary arteries was oversewn and a vein graft bypass was performed. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 37 patients (7.8%), and 152 patients (32%) had major morbidity and operative mortality. On multivariable analysis, risk factors associated with increased 30-day mortality included older age and coronary reimplantation by a technique other than direct anastomosis. Indirect coronary reimplantation was also associated with a higher incidence of major morbidity and operative mortality, as were more than 1 previous cardiac operation and preoperative New York Heart Association functional class III/IV or greater., Conclusions: In the largest reported cohort of aortic root replacement after previous cardiac surgery, the reoperative Bentall procedure was associated with a significant operative risk. The need for complex coronary reimplantation techniques was an important factor associated with adverse perioperative events., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To examine the late outcomes of reimplantation of the aortic valve (RAV) in patients followed prospectively since surgery., Methods: All 465 patients who had RAV from 1989 to 2018 were followed prospectively with periodic clinical and echocardiographic assessments. Mean follow-up was 10 ± 6 years and 98% complete., Results: Patients' mean age was 47 ± 5.1 years, and 78% were men. The aortic root aneurysm was associated with Marfan syndrome in 164 patients, Loeys-Dietz syndrome in 13, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) in 67, and type A aortic dissection in 33. Aortic insufficiency (AI) was greater than mild in 298 patients. Concomitant procedures were performed in 105 patients. There were 5 operative and 51 late deaths. At 20 years, 69.1% of patients were alive and free from aortic valve reoperation, and the cumulative probability of aortic valve reoperation with death as a competing risk was 6.0%, and the cumulative probability of developing moderate or severe AI was 10.2%. Only time per 1-year interval was associated with the development of postoperative AI by multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, >1.02-1.10; P = .006). Gradients across preserved BAV increased in 5 patients, and 1 required reoperation for aortic stenosis. Distal aortic dissections occurred in 22 patients, primarily in those with associated genetic syndromes., Conclusions: RAV provides excellent long-term results, but there is a progressive rate of AI over time, and patients with BAV may develop aortic stenosis. Patients with genetic syndromes have a risk of distal aortic dissections. Continued surveillance after RAV is necessary., (Copyright © 2020 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)