1. A parallel-arm, randomized trial of Behavioral Activation Therapy for anhedonia versus mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for adults with anhedonia.
- Author
-
Cernasov PM, Walsh EC, Nagy GA, Kinard JL, Kelley L, Phillips RD, Pisoni A, Diehl J, Haworth K, West J, Freeman L, Pfister C, Scott M, Daughters SB, Gaylord S, Dichter GS, and Smoski MJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Behavior Therapy methods, Anhedonia, Mindfulness methods, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy methods
- Abstract
Background: Anhedonia, deficits in motivation and pleasure, is a transdiagnostic symptom of psychopathology and negative prognostic marker., Methods: In this randomized, parallel-arm clinical trial, a novel intervention, Behavioral Activation Treatment for Anhedonia (BATA), was compared to an individually administered Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) in a transdiagnostic cohort of adults with clinically significant anhedonia (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers NCT02874534 and NCT04036136). Participants received 8-15 individual psychotherapy sessions, once weekly, with either BATA (n = 61) or MBCT (n = 55) and completed repeated self-report assessment of anhedonia and other internalizing symptoms., Results: Indicators of treatment feasibility were similar across conditions, though MBCT showed a trend towards greater attrition rates than BATA, with an adjusted odd's ratio of 2.04 [0.88, 4.73]. Treatment effects on the primary clinical endpoint of anhedonia symptoms did not significantly differ, with a 14-week estimated difference on the Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) of -0.20 [-2.25, 1.84] points in BATA compared to MBCT (z = 0.19, p = 0.845, d = 0.05). The expected 14-week change in SHAPS scores across conditions was -7.18 [-8.22, -6.15] points (z = 13.6, p < 0.001, d = 1.69). There were no significant differences in the proportion of participants demonstrating reliable and clinically significant improvements in SHAPS scores, or in the magnitude of internalizing symptom reductions., Limitations: Limitations included a modest sample size, lack of longer-term follow up data, and non-preregistered analytic plan., Discussion: There was no evidence to support superior clinical efficacy of BATA over MBCT in a transdiagnostic cohort of adults with elevated anhedonia. Both interventions reduced anhedonia symptoms to a comparable magnitude of other existing treatments., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The work described in this manuscript has not been published previously, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and the publication of this manuscript is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out. If accepted, this work will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically, without written consent of the copyright holder. We have no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, that would preclude a fair review or publication of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF