Search

Background: New Zealand's (NZ) complete absence of community transmission of influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) after May 2020, likely due to COVID-19 elimination measures, provided a rare opportunity to assess the impact of border restrictions on common respiratory viral infections over the ensuing 2 years., Methods: We collected the data from multiple surveillance systems, including hospital-based severe acute respiratory infection surveillance, SHIVERS-II, -III and -IV community cohorts for acute respiratory infection (ARI) surveillance, HealthStat sentinel general practice (GP) based influenza-like illness surveillance and SHIVERS-V sentinel GP-based ARI surveillance, SHIVERS-V traveller ARI surveillance and laboratory-based surveillance. We described the data on influenza, RSV and other respiratory viral infections in NZ before, during and after various stages of the COVID related border restrictions., Results: We observed that border closure to most people, and mandatory government-managed isolation and quarantine on arrival for those allowed to enter, appeared to be effective in keeping influenza and RSV infections out of the NZ community. Border restrictions did not affect community transmission of other respiratory viruses such as rhinovirus and parainfluenza virus type-1. Partial border relaxations through quarantine-free travel with Australia and other countries were quickly followed by importation of RSV in 2021 and influenza in 2022., Conclusion: Our findings inform future pandemic preparedness and strategies to model and manage the impact of influenza and other respiratory viral threats., (© 2024 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Stringent nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as lockdowns and border closures are not currently recommended for pandemic influenza control. New Zealand used these NPIs to eliminate coronavirus disease 2019 during its first wave. Using multiple surveillance systems, we observed a parallel and unprecedented reduction of influenza and other respiratory viral infections in 2020. This finding supports the use of these NPIs for controlling pandemic influenza and other severe respiratory viral threats.

Introduction: Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is rising globally. Assessing SMM is an important quality measure. This study aimed to examine SMM in a national cohort in New Zealand., Material and Methods: This is a national retrospective review of pregnant or postpartum women admitted to an Intensive Care Unit or High Dependency Unit during pregnancy or recent postpartum. Outcomes were rates of SMM and assessment of potential preventability. Preventability was defined as any action on the part of the provider, system or patient that may have contributed to progression to more severe morbidity, and was assessed by a multidisciplinary review team., Results: Severe maternal morbidity was 6.2 per 1000 deliveries (95% confidence interval 5.7-6.8) with higher rates for Pacific, Indian and other Asian racial groups. Major blood loss (39.4%), preeclampsia-associated conditions (23.3%) and severe sepsis (14.1%) were the most common causes of SMM. Potential preventability was highest with sepsis cases (56%) followed by preeclampsia and major blood loss (34.3% and 30.9%). Of these cases, only 36.4% were managed appropriately as determined by multidisciplinary review. Provider factors such as inappropriate diagnosis, delay or failure to recognize high risk were the most common factors associated with potential preventability of SMM. Pacific Island women had over twice the rate of preventable morbidity (relative risk 2.48, 95% confidence interval 1.28-4.79)., Conclusions: Multidisciplinary external anonymized review of SMM showed that over a third of cases were potentially preventable, being due to substandard provider care with increased preventability rates for racial/ethnic minority women. Monitoring country rates of SMM and implementing case reviews to assess potential preventability are appropriate quality improvement measures and external review of anonymized cases may reduce racial profiling to inform unbiased appropriate interventions and resource allocation to help prevent these severe events., (© 2018 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)