Search

Background: In kidney transplantation, molecular diagnostics may be a valuable approach to improve the precision of the diagnosis. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS), we aimed to identify clinically relevant archetypes., Methods: We conducted an Illumina bulk RNA sequencing on 770 kidney biopsies (540 kidney recipients) collected between 2006 and 2021 from 11 European centers. Differentially expressed genes were determined for 11 Banff lesions. An ElasticNet model was used for feature selection, and 4 machine learning classifiers were trained to predict the probability of presence of the lesions. NGS-based classifiers were used in an unsupervised archetypal analysis to different archetypes. The association of the archetypes with allograft survival was assessed using the iBox risk prediction score., Results: The ElasticNet feature selection reduced the number of the genes from a range of 859-10 830 to a range of 52-867 genes. NGS-based classifiers demonstrated robust performances (precision-recall area under the curves 0.708-0.980) in predicting the Banff lesions. Archetypal analysis revealed 8 distinct phenotypes, each characterized by distinct clinical, immunological, and histological features. Although the archetypes confirmed the well-defined Banff rejection phenotypes for T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, equivocal histologic antibody-mediated rejection, and borderline diagnoses were reclassified into different archetypes based on their molecular signatures. The 8 NGS-based archetypes displayed distinct allograft survival profiles with incremental graft loss rates between archetypes, ranging from 90% to 56% rates 7 y after evaluation (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Using molecular phenotyping, 8 archetypes were identified. These NGS-based archetypes might improve disease characterization, reclassify ambiguous Banff diagnoses, and enable patient-specific risk stratification., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recently, interest in transcriptomic assessment of kidney biopsies has been growing. This study investigates the use of NGS to identify gene expression changes and analyse the pathways involved in rejection. An Illumina bulk RNA sequencing on the polyadenylated RNA of 770 kidney biopsies was conducted. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were determined for AMR and TCMR using DESeq2. Genes were segregated according to their previous descriptions in known panels (microarray or the Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel) to obtain NGS-specific genes. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the Reactome and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) public repositories. The differential gene expression using NGS analysis identified 6,141 and 8,478 transcripts associated with AMR and TCMR. While most of the genes identified were included in the microarray and the B-HOT panels, NGS analysis identified 603 (9.8%) and 1,186 (14%) new specific genes. Pathways analysis showed that the B-HOT panel was associated with the main immunological processes involved during AMR and TCMR. The microarrays specifically integrated metabolic functions and cell cycle progression processes. Novel NGS-specific based transcripts associated with AMR and TCMR were discovered, which might represent a novel source of targets for drug designing and repurposing., Competing Interests: Author PG was employed by GenoSplice. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Cortes Garcia, Giarraputo, Racapé, Goutaudier, Ursule-Dufait, de la Grange, Adoux, Raynaud, Couderau, Mezine, Dagobert, Bestard, Moreso, Villard, Halleck, Giral, Brouard, Danger, Gourraud, Rabant, Couzi, Le Quintrec, Kamar, Morelon, Vrtovsnik, Taupin, Snanoudj, Legendre, Anglicheau, Budde, Lefaucheur, Loupy and Aubert.)

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected health systems and medical research worldwide but its impact on the global publication dynamics and non-COVID-19 research has not been measured. We hypothesized that the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted the scientific production of non-COVID-19 research., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive meta-research on studies (original articles, research letters and case reports) published between 01/01/2019 and 01/01/2021 in 10 high-impact medical and infectious disease journals (New England Journal of Medicine, Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association, Nature Medicine, British Medical Journal, Annals of Internal Medicine, Lancet Global Health, Lancet Public Health, Lancet Infectious Disease and Clinical Infectious Disease). For each publication, we recorded publication date, publication type, number of authors, whether the publication was related to COVID-19, whether the publication was based on a case series, and the number of patients included in the study if the publication was based on a case report or a case series. We estimated the publication dynamics with a locally estimated scatterplot smoothing method. A Natural Language Processing algorithm was designed to calculate the number of authors for each publication. We simulated the number of non-COVID-19 studies that could have been published during the pandemic by extrapolating the publication dynamics of 2019 to 2020, and comparing the expected number to the observed number of studies., Results: Among the 22,525 studies assessed, 6319 met the inclusion criteria, of which 1022 (16.2%) were related to COVID-19 research. A dramatic increase in the number of publications in general journals was observed from February to April 2020 from a weekly median number of publications of 4.0 (IQR: 2.8-5.5) to 19.5 (IQR: 15.8-24.8) (p < 0.001), followed afterwards by a pattern of stability with a weekly median number of publications of 10.0 (IQR: 6.0-14.0) until December 2020 (p = 0.045 in comparison with April). Two prototypical editorial strategies were found: 1) journals that maintained the volume of non-COVID-19 publications while integrating COVID-19 research and thus increased their overall scientific production, and 2) journals that decreased the volume of non-COVID-19 publications while integrating COVID-19 publications. We estimated using simulation models that the COVID pandemic was associated with a 18% decrease in the production of non-COVID-19 research. We also found a significant change of the publication type in COVID-19 research as compared with non-COVID-19 research illustrated by a decrease in the number of original articles, (47.9% in COVID-19 publications vs 71.3% in non-COVID-19 publications, p < 0.001). Last, COVID-19 publications showed a higher number of authors, especially for case reports with a median of 9.0 authors (IQR: 6.0-13.0) in COVID-19 publications, compared to a median of 4.0 authors (IQR: 3.0-6.0) in non-COVID-19 publications (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In this meta-research gathering publications from high-impact medical journals, we have shown that the dramatic rise in COVID-19 publications was accompanied by a substantial decrease of non-COVID-19 research. META-RESEARCH REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/9vtzp/ ., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The development of new high-throughput technologies in genomics and then in transcriptomics has modified clinical approach in nephrology. At the interface between high-throughput technologies (microarray, new generation sequencing «NGS») and few mRNA analysis (reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR [RT-qPCR]), the nCounter® of NanoString® offers a new and complementary approach. Capable of analyzing formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples, this technology is a credible candidate for implanting transcriptomics in clinical routine., (Copyright © 2020 Société francophone de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

This meeting report from the XV Banff conference describes the creation of a multiorgan transplant gene panel by the Banff Molecular Diagnostics Working Group (MDWG). This Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel is the culmination of previous work by the MDWG to identify a broadly useful gene panel based on whole transcriptome technology. A data-driven process distilled a gene list from peer-reviewed comprehensive microarray studies that discovered and validated their use in kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplant biopsies. These were supplemented by genes that define relevant cellular pathways and cell types plus 12 reference genes used for normalization. The 770 gene B-HOT panel includes the most pertinent genes related to rejection, tolerance, viral infections, and innate and adaptive immune responses. This commercially available panel uses the NanoString platform, which can quantitate transcripts from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. The B-HOT panel will facilitate multicenter collaborative clinical research using archival samples and permit the development of an open source large database of standardized analyses, thereby expediting clinical validation studies. The MDWG believes that a pathogenesis and pathway based molecular approach will be valuable for investigators and promote therapeutic decision-making and clinical trials., (© 2020 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)