Search

Background: Identifying allergic rhinitis requires allergy testing, but the first-line referral for rhinitis are usually primary care physicians (PCP), who are not familiar with such tests. The availability of easy and simple tests to be used by PCP to suggest allergy should be very useful., Methods: The Respiratory Allergy Prediction (RAP) test, based on 9 questions and previously validated by a panel of experts, was evaluated in this study., Results: An overall number of 401 patients (48.6% males, age range 14-62 years) with respiratory symptoms was included. Of them, 89 (22.2%) showed negative results to SPT, while 312 (77.8%) had at least one positive result to SPT. Cohen's kappa coefficient showed that all questions had an almost perfect excellent agreement between pre and post-test. The algorithm of decision-tree growth Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector showed that answering yes to the question 4 (Your nasal/ocular complains do usually start or worsen during the spring?), 6 (Did you ever had cough or shortness of breath, even during exercise?) and 8 (Do you use nasal sprays frequently?) gave a probability to have a positive SPT of 85%., Conclusions: These findings show that RAP test can be proposed as an useful tool to be used by physician other than allergists when evaluating patients with rhinitis, suggesting the need of allergy testing.

This retrospective study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical characteristics, course and treatment of children (0-14 years of age) diagnosed with a primary CNS tumor during the period 1976-1982 in Italy. Four hundred and sixty-two patients (263 males and 199 females) were followed by 18 various neurosurgical and pediatric oncology centers. The histologic types most frequently reported were: medulloblastoma (23%), astrocytoma (16%), ependymoma (11%) and spongioblastoma (11%). Of the 388 patients who underwent surgery, radical excision was reported in 42%, partial excision in 32%, biopsy only in 6%, and unqualified surgery in 4%; 19% had no surgery. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined were administered in 61% of the 143 patients followed at pediatric oncology centers; 19% received radiotherapy alone, 3% chemotherapy alone, and 17% neither treatment. Forty-six percent of the patients were reported alive, 40% dead, and 14% lost to follow-up. Performance status was identified for 62 patients. The investigation revealed marked differences in the therapeutic treatment administered, thus precluding valid data analysis. This emphasizes the need to coordinate efforts among the institutions and the disciplines involved in the treatment of this form of childhood cancer.