Search

Objectives: To investigate the prognostic utility of 28 serum biomarkers in systemic sclerosis (SSc), SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) and clinically relevant disease subgroups., Methods: Participants with sera, high-resolution CT and lung function within 12 months of baseline were identified from the Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study. Baseline was the time of serum collection. Twenty-seven of the prespecified 28 serum biomarkers were analysed and biomarker associations with mortality and ILD progression were investigated in univariable and multivariable analyses, including within disease subgroups and combined with established risk factors for poorer prognosis in SSc., Results: A total of 407 participants were identified, 252 (61.9%) with SSc-ILD. The median (interquartile range) follow-up after biomarker measurement was 6.31 (3.11-9.22) years. Sixteen biomarkers were associated with increased mortality. High levels of VCAM-1 were most strongly associated with mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 3.55; 95% CI 2.37-5.33; P < 0.001]. Five additional biomarkers had an HR >2: SP-D (2.28, 1.57-3.31; P < 0.001), E-selectin (2.19, 1.53-3.14; P < 0.001), IL-6 (2.15, 1.50-3.09; P < 0.001), MMP-3 (2.05, 1.42-2.95; P < 0.001) and ET-1 (2.03, 1.40-2.92; P < 0.001). Eleven biomarkers were independently associated with mortality following adjustment for sex, age and baseline forced vital capacity (FVC%predicted). Three biomarkers were associated with ILD progression at 1-year follow-up: CXCL4 (odds ratio 2.67, 1.46-4.88; P = 0.001), MMP-1 (2.56, 1.43-4.59; P = 0.002) and ET-1 (2.18, 1.24-3.83; P = 0.007)., Conclusion: Multiple biomarkers, especially VCAM-1, E-selectin, SP-D and CXCL4, provide prognostic utility beyond that of established risk factors for patients with SSc., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Background: Drugs used to treat rheumatic disease are associated with pneumotoxicity (drug-induced lung disease), but little is known about associated risk factors., Aim: To determine expert physician-perceived risk factors for developing pneumotoxicity in patients with rheumatologic conditions., Methods: A modified international 3-tier Delphi exercise was performed. Tier 1 determined patient and drug variables that physicians perceive to be risk factors. Tier 2 determined degree of risk associated with the Tier-1 derived variables. Tier 3 aimed to internally validate and stratify exemplar cases into risk categories., Results: 134 pulmonologists and 49 rheumatologists responded to Tier 1;157 physicians completed all tiers. Perceived risk factors included: drug type; history of previous pneumotoxicity; age; smoking; underlying rheumatic disease type and activity; renal function; pulmonary hypertension; left ventricular failure;presence, nature, severity and progression of pre-existing interstitial lung disease. Tier 2 data stratified these variables into risk profiles e.g. never versus current smoking was perceived as low and high risk respectively. An example of perceived high risk resulting from Tier 3 is a 75-year-old current smoker with high-activity rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with severe, progressive ILD being started on methotrexate. A perceived low risk is a 75-year-old currentsmoker with moderate-activity RA and emphysema with no cardiac or renal disease and no pre-existing ILD being started on rituximab. A risk prediction scoring tool is being developed to be used in validation studies., Conclusion: This modified Delphi exercise defined and stratified the perceived risk factors for developing pneumotoxicity. Age, current smoking, high underlying rheumatological disease activity, HRCT definite UIP and honeycombing, severity and progression of pre-existing ILD were perceived to be the highest risk-factors., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) relating to specific occupational, environmental or medication exposures. Disease behaviour is influenced by the nature of exposure and the host response, with varying degrees of lung inflammation and fibrosis seen within individuals. The differentiation of HP from other ILDs is important due to distinct causes, pathophysiology, prognosis and management implications. This Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) position statement aims to provide an up-to-date summary of the evidence for clinicians relating to the diagnosis and management of HP in adults, in the Australian and New Zealand context. This document highlights recent relevant findings and gaps in the literature for which further research is required., (© 2024 The Author(s). Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Objective: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a rare systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) with significant heterogeneity and no shared classification criteria. We aimed to identify clinical and serological features associated with ASSD that may be suitable for inclusion in the data-driven classification criteria for ASSD., Methods: We utilized a large, international, multi-center "Classification Criteria for Anti-synthetase Syndrome" (CLASS) project database, which includes both ASSD patients and controls with mimicking conditions, namely SARDs and/or interstitial lung disease (ILD). The local diagnoses of ASSD and controls were confirmed by project team members. We employed univariable logistic regression and multivariable Ridge regression to evaluate clinical and serological features associated with an ASSD diagnosis in a randomly selected subset of the cohort., Results: Our analysis included 948 ASSD cases and 1077 controls. Joint, muscle, lung, skin, and cardiac involvement were more prevalent in ASSD than in controls. Specific variables associated with ASSD included arthritis, diffuse myalgia, muscle weakness, muscle enzyme elevation, ILD, mechanic's hands, secondary pulmonary hypertension due to ILD, Raynaud phenomenon, and unexplained fever. In terms of serological variables, Jo-1 and non-Jo-1 anti-synthetase autoantibodies, antinuclear antibodies with cytoplasmic pattern, and anti-Ro52 autoantibodies were associated with ASSD. In contrast, isolated arthralgia, dysphagia, electromyography/MRI/muscle biopsy findings suggestive of myopathy, inflammatory rashes, myocarditis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension did not differentiate between ASSD and controls or were inversely associated with ASSD., Conclusion: We identified key clinical and serological variables associated with ASSD, which will help clinicians and offer insights into the development of data-driven classification criteria for ASSD., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) have high morbidity and mortality; thus, novel treatments are needed., Objectives: Assess efficacy and safety of admilparant (BMS-986278), an oral lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 antagonist, in patients with IPF and PPF., Methods: This phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included parallel cohorts of patients with IPF ( n = 278 randomized, n = 276 treated) or PPF ( n = 125 randomized, n = 123 treated) who received 30-mg admilparant, 60-mg admilparant, or placebo (1:1:1) twice daily for 26 weeks. Background antifibrotics (both cohorts) and immunosuppressants (PPF only) were permitted., Measurements and Main Results: Rates of change in percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) over 26 weeks for IPF were -2.7% (placebo), -2.8% (30-mg), and -1.2% (60-mg) and for PPF were -4.3% (placebo), -2.9% (30-mg), and -1.1% (60-mg). Treatment differences between 60-mg admilparant and placebo were 1.4% (95% CI, -0.1 to 3.0) for IPF and 3.2% (95% CI, 0.7 to 5.7) for PPF. Treatment effect was observed with or without background antifibrotics in both cohorts. Diarrhea occurred at similar frequencies in admilparant arms versus placebo. Transient day 1 post-dose blood pressure reductions were observed in all arms in both cohorts but greater with admilparant. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events were similar across IPF arms and lower with admilparant (2.5% [30-mg]; 0% [60-mg]) versus placebo (17.1%) for PPF., Conclusions: In this first phase 2 study to evaluate antifibrotic treatment in parallel IPF and PPF cohorts, 60-mg admilparant slowed lung function decline and was safe and well tolerated, supporting further evaluation in phase 3 trials. Clinical trial registration available at www., Clinicaltrials: gov, ID: NCT04308681.

Background: In patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), exercise-induced desaturation during the 6-min walk test (6MWT), specifically nadir oxygen saturation (nSpO2) of ≤88 % is a negative prognostic marker. As the 6MWT is often impractical for ILD patients, the aim of this study is to compare the 1-min sit-to-stand test (1minSTS) with the 6MWT to detect exercise-induced desaturation., Methods: Participants were recruited from a tertiary referral clinic with both tests performed on the same day. Utilising Bland-Altman analysis, the relationship between nSpO2 on 1minSTS and 6MWT was determined. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) determined the ability of nSpO2 on 1minSTS test to predict SpO2 ≤88 % on 6MWT., Results: Fifty participants completed the study (idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis n = 24, 48 %; connective tissue disease associated ILD n = 20, 40 %; other ILD n = 6, 12 %). Mean (SD) FVC%pred was 73 ± 16 %, mean DLCO%pred 57 ± 16 % and resting SpO2 99 ± 1 %. The 1minSTS resulted in less exercise-induced oxygen desaturation, with a median IQR nSpO2 of 95 % (89-98) and 93 % (85-96) respectively (p < 0.001). Moderate agreement was determined between the nSpO2 on both tests, with a mean difference of 3.2 % [-14 to +3.0 %]. The 1minSTS test accurately identified participants with nSpO2 ≤88 % on 6MWT (AUC 0.96). Oxygen desaturation ≤94 % during the 1minSTS test provided 100 % sensitivity and 87 % specificity for oxygen desaturation ≤88 % at 6MWT., Conclusion: This study demonstrates that exercise-induced oxygen desaturation during the 1minSTS test correlates with oxygen desaturation on 6MWT. The 1minSTS may be a practical screening tool for ILD patients who would benefit from further exercise testing., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no conflicts of interest to declare that directly relate to this manuscript. Unrelated to the current work LT reports speaker's fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Erbe Elektromedezin GbH, and prior in-kind research support from Air Liquide Healthcare. TJC reports grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingleheim, Pharmaxis, Bristol Myers Squibb, 4D, Roche, Pliant, Bridge Biotherapeutics and Avalyn Therapeutics; consulting fees with Boehringer Ingleheim, Pharmaxis, Bristol Myers Squibb, 4D, Roche, Pliant Bridge Biotherapeutics, Avalyn Therapeutics, DevPro, Endeavour, BioMedicine and Cincera; honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche and Boehringer Ingleheim; support for attending meetings and/or travel with Bristol Myers Squibb and Boehringer Ingelheim; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory Board with Boehringer Ingleheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche, Pliant, Bridge Biotherapeutics, Avalyn Therapeutics, DevPro and Endeavour BioMedicine. SW has received an educational grant from Boehringer Ingleheim., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: COVID-19 has led to significant morbidity and mortality globally. Post-COVID sequelae can persist beyond the acute and subacute phases of infection, often termed post-COVID syndrome (PCS). There is limited evidence on the appropriate rehabilitation for people with PCS. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect on exercise capacity, symptoms, cognition, anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, and fatigue of a 4-week, twice-weekly supervised pulmonary telerehabilitation program compared with usual medical care for people with PCS with persistent respiratory symptoms., Methods: The study will be a multi-site randomized controlled trial with assessor blinding. Participants with confirmed previous COVID-19 infection and persistent respiratory symptoms who attend a post-COVID respiratory clinic will be randomized 1:1 to either an intervention group of 4 weeks, twice-weekly pulmonary telerehabilitation or a control group of usual medical care. Participants in the control group will be invited to cross-over into the intervention group after the week 4 assessment. Primary outcome: exercise capacity measured by the 1-minute sit-to-stand test. Secondary outcomes: 5 repetition sit-to-stand test; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test; 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Fatigue Severity Scale; and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Outcomes will be collected at baseline, after 4-weeks intervention or control period, after intervention in the cross-over group, and at 12-month follow-up., Impact: Research into effective rehabilitation programs is crucial given the substantial morbidity associated with PCS and the lack of long-term data for COVID-19 recovery. A short-duration pulmonary telerehabilitation program, if effective compared with usual care, could inform practice guidelines and direct future clinical trials for the benefit of individuals with persistent respiratory symptoms post-COVID., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Physical Therapy Association.)

Background: Pulmonary fibrosis results from alveolar injury, leading to extracellular matrix remodelling and impaired lung function. This study aimed to classify patients with pulmonary fibrosis according to blood biomarkers to differentiate distinct disease patterns, known as endotypes., Methods: In this cluster analysis, we first classified patients from the PROFILE study, a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort of individuals with incident idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis or non-specific interstitial pneumonia in the UK (Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham; and Royal Brompton Hospital, London). 13 blood biomarkers representing extracellular matrix remodelling, epithelial stress, and thrombosis were measured by ELISA in the PROFILE study. We classified patients by unsupervised consensus clustering. To evaluate generalisability, a machine learning classifier trained on biomarker signatures derived from consensus clustering was applied to a replication dataset from the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry (AIPFR). Biomarker associations with mortality and change in percentage of predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) were assessed, adjusting for age, gender, baseline FVC%, and antifibrotic treatment and steroid treatment before and after baseline. Mortality risk associated with the clusters in the PROFILE cohort was evaluated with Cox proportional hazards models, and mixed-effects models were used to analyse how clustering was associated with longitudinal FVC% in the PROFILE and AIPFR cohorts., Findings: 455 of 580 participants from the PROFILE study (348 [76%] men and 107 [24%] women; mean age 72·4 years [SD 8·3]) were included in the analysis. Within this group, three clusters were identified based on blood biomarkers. A basement membrane collagen (BM) cluster (n=248 [55%]) showed high concentrations of PRO-C4, PRO-C28, C3M, and C6M, whereas an epithelial injury (EI) cluster (n=109 [24%]) showed high concentrations of MMP-7, SP-D, CYFRA211, CA19-9, and CA-125. The third cluster (crosslinked fibrin [XF] cluster; n=98 [22%]) had high concentrations of X-FIB. In the replication dataset (117 of 833 patients from AIPFR; 87 [74%] men and 30 [26%] women; mean age 72·9 years [SD 7·9]), we identified the same three clusters (BM cluster, n=93 [79%]; EI cluster, n=8 [7%]; XF cluster, n=16 [14%]). These clusters showed similarities with clusters in the PROFILE dataset regarding blood biomarkers and phenotypic signatures. In the PROFILE dataset, the EI and XF clusters were associated with increased mortality risk compared with the BM cluster (EI vs BM: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·88 [95% CI 1·42-2·49], p<0·0001; XF vs BM: adjusted HR 1·53 [1·13-2·06], p=0·0058). The EI cluster showed the greatest annual FVC% decline, followed by the BM and XF clusters. A similar FVC% decline pattern was observed in these clusters in the AIPFR replication dataset., Interpretation: Blood biomarker clustering in pulmonary fibrosis identified three distinct blood biomarker signatures associated with lung function and prognosis, suggesting unique pulmonary fibrosis biomarker patterns. These findings support the presence of pulmonary fibrosis endotypes with the potential to guide targeted therapy development., Funding: None., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests YM reports personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. TJC reports fees for work on scientific advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Vicore, Pliant, Endeavour Bioscience, and DevPro, and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, and Biogen, outside the submitted work. DJL and JMBS are employees and shareholders of Nordic Bioscience. MAK is an employee and shareholder of Nordic Bioscience and holds patents relating to neoepitopes. AUW reports receiving consulting, lecture, or educational fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Veracyte, and holds the honorary position of President of the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Diseases. LVW reports funding from, consultancy for, or collaboration with GSK, Genentech, Orion Pharma, and Galapagos. PLM has received, via his institution, industry-academic funding from AstraZeneca and has received speaker and consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. TMM has received industry-academic funding from GSK R&D and UCB, and consultancy or speaker's fees from Apellis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, GSK R&D, Indalo, Pliant, ProMetic, Roche, Samumed, UCB, and Celgene. RGJ has grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Biogen, Galecto, GSK, Nordic Bioscience, Redx, and Pliant, with all payments going to his institutions. RGJ has also served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daewoong, Veracyte, Resolution Therapeutics, and Pliant, has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Roche, PatientMPower, and AstraZeneca, has participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, and Vicore, and has an unpaid role in an advisory board at NuMedii. RGJ is also a trustee of Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Recent genetic and genomic advancements have elucidated the complex etiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), emphasizing the contribution of heritable factors. This state-of-the-art review synthesizes evidence on significant genetic contributors to pulmonary fibrosis (PF), including rare genetic variants and common SNPs. The MUC5B promoter variant is unusual, a common SNP that markedly elevates the risk of early and established PF. We address the utility of genetic variation in enhancing understanding of disease pathogenesis and clinical phenotypes, improving disease definitions, and informing prognosis and treatment response. Critical research gaps are highlighted, particularly the underrepresentation of non-European ancestries in PF genetic studies and the exploration of PF phenotypes beyond usual interstitial pneumonia/IPF. We discuss the role of telomere length, often critically short in PF, and its link to progression and mortality, underscoring the genetic complexity involving telomere biology genes ( TERT , TERC ) and others like SFTPC and MUC5B . In addition, we address the potential of gene-by-environment interactions to modulate disease manifestation, advocating for precision medicine in PF. Insights from gene expression profiling studies and multiomic analyses highlight the promise for understanding disease pathogenesis and offer new approaches to clinical care, therapeutic drug development, and biomarker discovery. Finally, we discuss the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomic research and therapies in PF, stressing the need for sound practices and informed clinical genetic discussions. Looking forward, we advocate for comprehensive genetic testing panels and polygenic risk scores to improve the management of PF and related ILDs across diverse populations.

Rationale: A phase II trial reported clinical benefit over 28 weeks in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who received zinpentraxin alfa. Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of zinpentraxin alfa in patients with IPF in a phase III trial. Methods: This 52-week phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pivotal trial was conducted at 275 sites in 29 countries. Patients with IPF were randomized 1:1 to intravenous placebo or zinpentraxin alfa 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in FVC. Secondary endpoints included absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in percent predicted FVC and 6-minute walk distance. Safety was monitored via adverse events. Post hoc analysis of the phase II and phase III data explored changes in FVC and their impact on the efficacy results. Measurements and Main Results: Of 664 randomized patients, 333 were assigned to placebo and 331 to zinpentraxin alfa. Four of the 664 randomized patients were never administered study drug. The trial was terminated early after a prespecified futility analysis that demonstrated no treatment benefit of zinpentraxin alfa over placebo. In the final analysis, absolute change from baseline to Week 52 in FVC was similar between placebo and zinpentraxin alfa (-214.89 ml and -235.72 ml; P  = 0.5420); there were no apparent treatment effects on secondary endpoints. Overall, 72.3% and 74.6% of patients receiving placebo and zinpentraxin alfa, respectively, experienced one or more adverse events. Post hoc analysis revealed that extreme FVC decline in two placebo-treated patients resulted in the clinical benefit of zinpentraxin alfa reported by phase II. Conclusions: Zinpentraxin alfa treatment did not benefit patients with IPF over placebo. Learnings from this program may help improve decision making around trials in IPF. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04552899).

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogenous group of over 200 disorders affecting the pulmonary interstitium. Although there have been advances in knowledge on ILDs in Australia, the characterisation of the health and economic burden of disease remained largely undetermined until recently., Objective: The main objective of this review is to provide a synopsis of health and economic burden of ILDs in Australia, based on recently completed research., Discussion: Recent research has demonstrated that idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most frequent ILD in Australia. Incidence and prevalence of IPF have demonstrated an increasing trend over the past decades. Mortality has also increased over the past decades, but has shown a slight decreasing trend recently, since the introduction of antifibrotic medication. Health-related quality of life is poor in patients with IPF, and care is estimated to cost approximately AU$299 million per year in Australia. Early diagnosis and referral to tertiary care is crucial for favourable outcomes, and general practitioners are considerably important to this as the first interface to identify patients at risk and detect early symptoms of ILDs.

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) with coexistent emphysema, termed combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) may associate with reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) declines compared to non-CPFE IPF patients. We examined associations between mortality and functional measures of disease progression in two IPF cohorts., Methods: Visual emphysema presence (>0% emphysema) scored on computed tomography identified CPFE patients (CPFE/non-CPFE: derivation cohort n=317/n=183, replication cohort n=358/n=152), who were subgrouped using 10% or 15% visual emphysema thresholds, and an unsupervised machine-learning model considering emphysema and interstitial lung disease extents. Baseline characteristics, 1-year relative FVC and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ( D LCO ) decline (linear mixed-effects models), and their associations with mortality (multivariable Cox regression models) were compared across non-CPFE and CPFE subgroups., Results: In both IPF cohorts, CPFE patients with ≥10% emphysema had a greater smoking history and lower baseline D LCO compared to CPFE patients with <10% emphysema. Using multivariable Cox regression analyses in patients with ≥10% emphysema, 1-year D LCO decline showed stronger mortality associations than 1-year FVC decline. Results were maintained in patients suitable for therapeutic IPF trials and in subjects subgrouped by ≥15% emphysema and using unsupervised machine learning. Importantly, the unsupervised machine-learning approach identified CPFE patients in whom FVC decline did not associate strongly with mortality. In non-CPFE IPF patients, 1-year FVC declines ≥5% and ≥10% showed strong mortality associations., Conclusion: When assessing disease progression in IPF, D LCO decline should be considered in patients with ≥10% emphysema and a ≥5% 1-year relative FVC decline threshold considered in non-CPFE IPF patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J. Jacob reports fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, NHSX, Takeda and GlaxoSmithKline, unrelated to the submitted work, and was supported by Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship 209553/Z/17/Z and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University College London. N. Mogulkoc reports grant TUBITAK (EJP Rare Disease project “COCOS-IPF”), fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Nobel Turkey unrelated to the submitted work, and received support for travel to meetings from Roche and Actelion. T.J. Corte reports unrestricted educational grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Biogen and Galapagos, fees from Roche, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vicore and DevPro, assistance for travel to meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Roche, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vicore, Ad Alta, Bridge Biotherapeutics and DevPro. P. Vasudev reports financial interests from Blackford Analysis. T. Goos is supported by Research Foundation Flanders (1S73921N). L.J. De Sadeleer is supported by Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions postdoctoral fellowship within the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme. H. Jo reports fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, and received assistance for travel to meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. S. Verleden reports consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi. M. Vermant is supported by an FWO (Research Flanders Foundation) fellowship. S.M. Janes reports fees from AstraZeneca, Bard1 Bioscience, Achilles Therapeutics and Jansen unrelated to the submitted work, received assistance for travel to meetings from AstraZeneca and Takeda, and is the investigator lead on grants from GRAIL Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and Owlstone. A.U. Wells reports personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer and Roche Pharmaceuticals, and personal fees from Blade, outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors report no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright ©The authors 2024. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Background and Objective: The interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogenous group of disorders with similar clinical presentation, but widely varying prognoses. The use of a pragmatic disease behaviour classification (DBC), first proposed in international guidelines in 2013, categorises diseases into five behavioural classes based on their predicted clinical course. This study aimed to determine the prognostic utility of the DBC in an ILD cohort., Methods: Consecutive patients presented at the weekly multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) of a specialist ILD centre were included. MDM consensus was obtained for diagnosis and DBC category (1-5). Baseline and serial clinical and physiological data were collected over the study period (median 3.9 years, range 0-5.4 years). The relationship between DBC and prognostic outcomes was explored., Results: 137 ILD patients, [64 (47%) female] were included with mean age 67.0 ± 1.1 years, baseline FVC% 72.7 ± 1.7, and baseline DLco% 57.8 ± 1.6%. Patients were stratified into DBC by consensus at MDM: DBC1 n = 0 (0%), DBC2 n = 16 (12%), DBC3 n = 10 (7.3%), DBC4 n = 55 (40%), and DBC5 n = 56 (41%). On univariable Cox regression, increasing DBC class was associated with poorer progression-free survival (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox regression, DBC remained predictive of PFS when combined with age and gender (HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9, p = 0.011), baseline FVC% (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-1.8, p = 0.003) and ILD diagnosis (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2, p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: DBC as determined at ILD multidisciplinary meeting may be a useful prognostic tool for the management of ILD patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: M. H. reports a relationship with Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand that includes funding grants and relationship with Centre of Research Excellence in Pulmonary Fibrosis that includes travel reimbursement. I. G. reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd that includes board membership, a relationship with Lassen Therapeutics 1, Inc, that includes consulting or advisory, a relationship with Tian Li that includes consulting or advisory, and a relationship with Avalyn Pharma Inc that includes consulting or advisory. J. A. M reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd that includes speaking and lecture fees. N. S. L. G. reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH that includes consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. N. S. L. G. also reports a relationship with AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP that includes speaking and lecture fees and a relationship with National Health and Medical Research Council that includes funding grants. T. J. C. declares a relationship with institutional grant Boehringer Ingleheim and Roche that includes advisory board and speaker fees, a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb, Vicore, DevPro, Bridge Biotherapeutics that includes advisory board, and a relationship with Biogen, Galapagos, Avalyn Pharma that includes institutional grant funding. C. F. M., D. C. C., M. E., T. J. C., and A. E. H report administrative support was provided by BOC Australia. None declared (A. T. B., M. S.).

Objectives: The CLASS (Classification Criteria of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome) project is a large international multicentre study that aims to create the first data-driven anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) classification criteria. Identifying anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies (anti-ARS) is crucial for diagnosis, and several commercial immunoassays are now available for this purpose. However, using these assays risks yielding false-positive or false-negative results, potentially leading to misdiagnosis. The established reference standard for detecting anti-ARS is immunoprecipitation (IP), typically employed in research rather than routine autoantibody testing. We gathered samples from participating centers and results from local anti-ARS testing. As an "ad-interim" study within the CLASS project, we aimed to assess how local immunoassays perform in real-world settings compared to our central definition of anti-ARS positivity., Methods: We collected 787 serum samples from participating centres for the CLASS project and their local anti-ARS test results. These samples underwent initial central testing using RNA-IP. Following this, the specificity of ARS was reconfirmed centrally through ELISA, line-blot assay (LIA), and, in cases of conflicting results, protein-IP. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated. We also calculated the inter-rater agreement between central and local results using a weighted κ co-efficient., Results: Our analysis demonstrates that local, real-world detection of anti-Jo1 is reliable with high sensitivity and specificity with a very good level of agreement with our central definition of anti-Jo1 antibody positivity. However, the agreement between local immunoassay and central determination of anti-non-Jo1 antibodies varied, especially among results obtained using local LIA, ELISA and "other" methods., Conclusions: Our study evaluates the performance of real-world identification of anti-synthetase antibodies in a large cohort of multi-national patients with ASSD and controls. Our analysis reinforces the reliability of real-world anti-Jo1 detection methods. In contrast, challenges persist for anti-non-Jo1 identification, particularly anti-PL7 and rarer antibodies such as anti-OJ/KS. Clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting anti-synthetase antibodies, especially when commercial immunoassays test positive for non-anti-Jo1 antibodies.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease leading to significant morbidity and mortality. In 2017 the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) and Lung Foundation Australia (LFA) published a position statement on the treatment of IPF. Since that time, subsidized anti-fibrotic therapy in the form of pirfenidone and nintedanib is now available in both Australia and New Zealand. More recently, evidence has been published in support of nintedanib for non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). Additionally, there have been numerous publications relating to the non-pharmacologic management of IPF and PPF. This 2023 update to the position statement for treatment of IPF summarizes developments since 2017 and reaffirms the importance of a multi-faceted approach to the management of IPF and progressive pulmonary fibrosis., (© 2024 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Introduction: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) is increasing in incidence, due to the use of many new drugs across a broad range of cancers and chronic inflammatory diseases. The presentation and onset of DI-ILD are variable even for the same drug across different individuals. Clinical suspicion is essential for identifying these conditions, with timely drug cessation an important determinant of outcomes., Areas Covered: This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date summary of epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of DI-ILD. Relevant research articles from PubMed and Medline searches up to September 2023 were screened and summarized. Specific drugs including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, methotrexate, and amiodarone are discussed in detail. The potential role of pharmacogenomic profiling for lung toxicity risk is considered., Expert Opinion: DI-ILD is likely to be an increasingly important contributor to respiratory disability in the community. These conditions can negatively impact quality of life and patient longevity, due to associated respiratory compromise as well as cessation of evidence-based therapy for the underlying disease. This clinical conundrum is relevant to all areas of medicine, necessitating increased understanding and greater vigilance for drug-related lung toxicity.

Millions of workers are exposed to substances known to cause occupational interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), particularly in developing countries. However, the burden of the disease is likely to be underestimated due to under-recognition, under-reporting or both. The diagnosis of occupational ILD requires a high level of suspicion and a thorough occupational history, as occupational and non-occupational ILDs may be clinically, functionally and radiologically indistinguishable, leading to delayed diagnosis and inappropriate management. A potential occupational aetiology should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of ILD, as removal from the workplace exposure, with or without treatment, is a key therapeutic intervention and may lead to significant improvement. In this article, we provide an overview of the 'traditional' inorganic dust-related ILDs but also address idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and the immunologically mediated chronic beryllium disease, sarcoidosis and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, with emphasis on the importance of surveillance and prevention for reducing the burden of these conditions. To this end, health-care professionals should be specifically trained about the importance of occupational exposures as a potential cause of ILD., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Internal Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Publication of The Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Background and Objective: Little is known about the association between ambient air pollution and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in areas with lower levels of exposure. We aimed to investigate the impact of air pollution on lung function and rapid progression of IPF in Australia., Methods: Participants were recruited from the Australian IPF Registry (n = 570). The impact of air pollution on changes in lung function was assessed using linear mixed models and Cox regression was used to investigate the association with rapid progression., Results: Median (25th-75th percentiles) annual fine particulate matter (<2.5 μm, PM 2.5 ) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) were 6.8 (5.7, 7.9) μg/m 3 and 6.7 (4.9, 8.2) ppb, respectively. Compared to living more than 100 m from a major road, living within 100 m was associated with a 1.3% predicted/year (95% confidence interval [CI] -2.4 to -0.3) faster annual decline in diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLco). Each interquartile range (IQR) of 2.2 μg/m 3 increase in PM 2.5 was associated with a 0.9% predicted/year (95% CI -1.6 to -0.3) faster annual decline in DLco, while there was no association observed with NO 2 . There was also no association between air pollution and rapid progression of IPF., Conclusion: Living near a major road and increased PM 2.5 were both associated with an increased rate of annual decline in DLco. This study adds to the evidence supporting the negative effects of air pollution on lung function decline in people with IPF living at low-level concentrations of exposure., (© 2023 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Patients with chronic lung diseases, particularly interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, frequently develop pulmonary hypertension, which results in clinical deterioration, worsening of oxygen uptake, and an increased mortality risk. Pulmonary hypertension can develop and progress independently from the underlying lung disease. The pulmonary vasculopathy is distinct from that of other forms of pulmonary hypertension, with vascular ablation due to loss of small pulmonary vessels being a key feature. Long-term tobacco exposure might contribute to this type of pulmonary vascular remodelling. The distinct pathomechanisms together with the underlying lung disease might explain why treatment options for this condition remain scarce. Most drugs approved for pulmonary arterial hypertension have shown no or sometimes harmful effects in pulmonary hypertension associated with lung disease. An exception is inhaled treprostinil, which improves exercise capacity in patients with interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension. There is a pressing need for safe, effective treatment options and for reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tools to detect and characterise pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic lung disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KMO has received fees for lectures or consultancy from Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, and United Therapeutics. TJC has received research grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Bristol Myers Squibb; personal fees from Promedior, Vicore, and DevPro Therapeutics; and research grants from Actelion, Galapagos, and Biogen. JCK is supported by PRACTIS – Clinician Scientist Program at Hannover Medical School, funded by the German Research Foundation (DGF, ME 3696/3–1). DM has received grants from and is a consultant for Acceleron, Merck, Actelion, Bayer, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. SDN is a consultant and on the speakers bureau for United Therapeutics; on the speakers bureau for Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim; and a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Merck, Bellerophon, and Third Pole. LCP has received educational grants and payments for lectures and travel from Janssen, Ferrer, and Altavant. DGK has received honoraria for lectures or consultancy from Acceleron, Actelion, Altavant, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and MSD; research grants to his institution from Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and funding from the National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Sheffield. LN declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a type of interstitial lung disease found mostly in elderly persons, characterized by a high symptom burden and frequent encounters with health services. This study aimed to quantify the economic burden of IPF in Australia with a focus on resource utilization and associated direct costs., Methods: Participants were recruited from the Australian IPF Registry (AIPFR) between August 2018 and December 2019. Data on resource utilization and costs were collected via cost diaries and linked administrative data. Clinical data were collected from the AIPFR. A "bottom up" costing methodology was utilized, and the costing was performed from a partial societal perspective focusing primarily on direct medical and non-medical costs. Costs were standardized to 2021 Australian dollars ($)., Results: The average annual total direct costs per person with IPF was $31,655 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): $27,723-$35,757). Extrapolating costs based on prevalence estimates, the total annual costs in Australia are projected to be $299 million (95% CI: $262 million-$338 million). Costs were mainly driven by antifibrotic medication, hospital admissions and medications for comorbidities. Disease severity, comorbidities and antifibrotic medication all had varying impacts on resource utilization and costs., Conclusion: This cost-of-illness study provides the first comprehensive assessment of IPF-related direct costs in Australia, identifies the key cost drivers and provides a framework for future health economic analyses. Additionally, it provided insight into the major cost drivers which include antifibrotic medication, hospital admissions and medications related to comorbidities. Our findings emphasize the importance of the appropriate management of comorbidities in the care of people with IPF as this was one of the main reasons for hospitalizations., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: In patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), we investigated composite serum biomarker panels for the diagnosis and risk stratification of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD)., Methods: We analyzed 28 biomarkers in 640 participants: 259 patients with SSc-ILD and 179 SSc patients without ILD (Australian Scleroderma Cohort Study), 172 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF-controls) (Australian IPF Registry), and 30 healthy controls. A composite index was developed from biomarkers associated with ILD in multivariable analysis derived at empirical thresholds. We evaluated the performance of the index to identify ILD, and specifically SSc-ILD, and its association with lung function, disease extent on radiography, and patient health-related quality of life in derivation and validation cohorts. Biomarkers to distinguish SSc-ILD from IPF-controls were identified., Results: A composite biomarker index, comprising surfactant protein D (SP-D), Ca15-3, and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), was strongly associated with SSc-ILD diagnosis, independent of age, sex, smoking history, and lung function (for biomarker index score 3, pooled adjusted odds ratio was 12.72 (95% confidence interval 4.59-35.21) (P < 0.001). The composite index strengthened the performance of individual biomarkers for SSc-ILD identification. In SSc patients, a higher index was associated with worse baseline disease severity (for biomarker index score 3 relative to biomarker index score 0, the adjusted absolute change in forced vital capacity percent predicted was -17.84% and the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide percent predicted was -20.16%; both P < 0.001)., Conclusion: A composite serum biomarker index, comprising SP-D, Ca15-3, and ICAM-1, may improve the identification and risk stratification of ILD in SSc patients at baseline., (© 2023 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Purpose: Little is known about the impact of co-morbidities on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We aimed to investigate the relative contribution of co-morbidities to HRQoL of people with IPF., Methods: N = 157 participants were recruited from the Australian IPF Registry (AIPFR). Health state utilities (HSUs), and the super-dimensions of physical and psychosocial scores were measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8-Dimensions (AQoL-8D). The impact of co-morbidities on HRQoL was investigated using linear regression and general dominance analyses., Results: A higher number of co-morbidities was associated with lower HSUs (p trend = 0.002). Co-morbidities explained 9.1% of the variance of HSUs, 16.0% of physical super-dimensional scores, and 4.2% of psychosocial super-dimensional scores. Arthritis was associated with a significant reduction on HSUs (β =  - 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.16 to - 0.02), largely driven by reduced scores on the physical super-dimension (β =  - 0.13, 95% CI - 0.20 to - 0.06). Heart diseases were associated with a significant reduction on HSUs (β =  - 0.09, 95% CI - 0.16 to - 0.02), driven by reduced scores on physical (β =  - 0.09, 95% CI - 0.16 to - 0.02) and psychosocial (β = -0.10, 95% CI - 0.17 to - 0.02) super-dimensions., Conclusions: Co-morbidities significantly impact HRQoL of people with IPF, with markedly negative impacts on their HSUs and physical health. A more holistic approach to the care of people with IPF is important as better management of these co-morbidities could lead to improved HRQoL in people with IPF., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare, irreversible, and progressive disease of the lungs. Common genetic variants, in addition to nongenetic factors, have been consistently associated with IPF. Rare variants identified by candidate gene, family-based, and exome studies have also been reported to associate with IPF. However, the extent to which rare variants, genome-wide, may contribute to the risk of IPF remains unknown. Objectives: We used whole-genome sequencing to investigate the role of rare variants, genome-wide, on IPF risk. Methods: As part of the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine Program, we sequenced 2,180 cases of IPF. Association testing focused on the aggregated effect of rare variants (minor allele frequency ⩽0.01) within genes or regions. We also identified individual rare variants that are influential within genes and estimated the heritability of IPF on the basis of rare and common variants. Measurements and Main Results: Rare variants in both TERT and RTEL1 were significantly associated with IPF. A single rare variant in each of the TERT and RTEL1 genes was found to consistently influence the aggregated test statistics. There was no significant evidence of association with other previously reported rare variants. The SNP heritability of IPF was estimated to be 32% (SE = 3%). Conclusions: Rare variants within the TERT and RTEL1 genes and well-established common variants have the largest contribution to IPF risk overall. Efforts in risk profiling or the development of therapies for IPF that focus on TERT , RTEL1 , common variants, and environmental risk factors are likely to have the largest impact on this complex disease.

Background: Biological sex, gender, and race are important considerations in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs)., Research Question: Does a patient's sex assigned at birth, and race, influence ILD treatment initiation?, Study Design and Methods: Patients with ILD from three longitudinal prospective registries were compared in this observational study. ILD-related medications included antifibrotics and immunomodulating medications. Race was dichotomized as "White" vs "non-White." Time to treatment initiation was determined from the date of the initial ILD registry visit to the date of first medication initiation. Proportions of treated patients were compared between groups by χ 2 test. Cox proportional analysis was used to determine how sex and race were associated with time to treatment initiation stratified by ILD diagnosis., Results: A total of 4,572 patients were included across all cohorts. The proportion of men who received treatment was higher than for women in the Canadian cohort (47% vs 40%; P < .001), and the proportion of White patients who received treatment was also higher compared with non-White patients (46% vs 36%; P < .001). In contrast, the proportion of treated men in the Chicago cohort was lower compared with women (56% vs 64%; P = .005), and that of White patients was lower compared with non-White patients (56% vs 69%; P < .001). No sex- or race-based differences in proportions of patients treated were found in the Australasian cohort. White race was significantly associated with earlier treatment initiation compared with non-White race across diagnoses in the Canadian cohort, whereas the opposite association was found in the Australasian cohort., Interpretation: Sex- and race-based differences exist in the initiation of ILD treatment, with variability across different cohorts in different countries. Reasons for these differences need to be further explored in future studies., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Research into novel diagnostic techniques and targeted therapeutics in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is moving the field toward increased precision and improved patient outcomes. An array of molecular techniques, machine learning approaches and other innovative methods including electronic nose technology and endobronchial optical coherence tomography are promising tools with potential to increase diagnostic accuracy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current evidence regarding evolving diagnostic methods in ILD and to consider their future role in routine clinical care., Competing Interests: LG has received travel and conference support from Boehringer Ingelheim. LT has provided paid consultancy for Erbe Elektromedezin and Boehringer Ingelheim. TC has received grant support, consultancy fees, and speaking honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche, consultancy fees from Bristol Myers Squibb; grant support from Biogen, and provides consultancy for DevPro and Ad Alta., (Copyright © 2023 Glenn, Troy and Corte.)

Background and Objective: Identification of an exposure is integral to the diagnosis, management, and prognostication of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP). Standardized questionnaires may aid in the identification of exposures, however, there currently are no evidence-based patient-validated questionnaires available. Key qualifiers (including duration and frequency) which indicate exposure relevance are also poorly defined. This study assessed the use of a standardized CHP exposure questionnaire in the identification of exposures and diagnostic confidence of CHP., Methods: People with a multi-disciplinary meeting (MDM) diagnosis from five Australian interstitial lung disease (ILD) expert centres who provided informed consent were included. Participants completed a previously developed standardized CHP Exposure Questionnaire. Responses were collected with the participant's MDM data, including diagnosis, diagnostic confidence, and clinician-elicited exposures., Results: One hundred thirty participants (IPF = 58, CHP = 24, CTD-ILD = 17, unclassifiable = 19, other = 12) were included. In 33% of CHP participants, a standardized questionnaire elicited an exposure where the clinician did not. 63% of these had provisional low confidence CHP; and an exposure history would have increased the diagnostic confidence in these cases. Using the standardized questionnaire, 96% of CHP participants reporting any exposure, compared with 75% of non-HP ILD participants. CHP participants were 3.5 times more likely (p = 0.004) to report their symptoms improved on avoidance, and 2.3 times more likely (p = 0.018) to report daily frequent exposure, compared with non-HP ILDs., Conclusion: A standardized questionnaire which elicits exposure characteristics in addition to presence or absence of relevant exposures can increase the diagnostic confidence of CHP and reduce the proportion of antigen-indeterminate CHP., (© 2022 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Objectives: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) includes a large group of conditions that lead to scarring of the lungs. The lack of available 5-level EuroQol 5D (EQ5D) data has limited the ability to conduct economic evaluations in ILD. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a mapping algorithm that predicts EQ5D utilities from commonly collected pulmonary function measurements (forced vital capacity [FVC] and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO]) in fibrotic ILDs., Methods: EQ5D utility and pulmonary function measurements from the Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis were included. Ordinary least squares (OLS), beta regression, two-part, and tobit models were used to map EQ5D utilities from FVC or DLCO. Model performance was assessed by comparing the predicted and observed utilities. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to test how well models performed across different patient characteristics. The models were then externally validated in the Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry., Results: The OLS model performed as well as other more complex models (root mean squared error: 0.17 for FVC and 0.16 for DLCO). As with the other models, the OLS algorithm performed well across the different subgroups (except for EQ5D utilities < 0.5) and in the external validation cohort., Conclusion: We developed a mapping algorithm that predicts EQ5D utilities from FVC and DLCO, with the intent that this algorithm can be applied to clinical trial populations and real-world cohorts that have not prioritized collection of health-related utilities. The mapping algorithm can be used in future economic evaluations of potential ILD therapies., Competing Interests: Drs. Wong, Johannson, Marcoux, Assayag, Manganas, Kolb, Ryerson report personal fees and/or grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Drs. Marcoux, Assayag, Kolb, and Ryerson report grants and/or personal fees from Roche Canada, outside the submitted work. Dr. Marcoux reports grants from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Drs. Wong and Assayag report personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr. Johannson reports grants from The Chest Foundation, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Pulmonary Fibrosis Society of Calgary, UCB Biopharma SPRL and personal fees from Blade Therapeutics, Theravance, Three Lakes Foundation, Pliant Therapeutics, and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., outside the submitted work. Dr. Manganas reports grants from Galapagos, outside the submitted work. Dr. Kolb reports grants from Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, grants from Canadian Institute for Health Research, grants and personal fees from Prometic, other from European Respiratory Journal, personal fees from Third Pole, MitoImmune, Abbvie, DevPro Biopharma, Horizon, Algernon, CSL Behring, and grants and personal fees from Pieris, outside the submitted work. Dr. Ryerson reports personal fees from Pliant Therapeutics and Veracyte, outside the submitted work;. Drs. Sun, Cox, Fisher, Khalil, Palmer, de Graaff, Walters, Hopkins, Zappala, Goh, Moodley, Navaratnam, Corte, and Zhang report nothing to disclose. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials., (Copyright: © 2023 Wong et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Purpose: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and debilitating chronic lung disease with a high symptom burden, which has a substantial impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Our study aimed to assess the suitability of the EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) and the Assessment of Quality of Life- eight-dimension (AQoL-8D) questionnaires in measuring HRQoL as health state utility values (HSUVs) in an Australian IPF cohort., Methods: Data for estimation of health state utility values (HSUVs) were collected from participants of the Australian IPF Registry (AIPFR) using self-administered surveys which included the EQ-5D-5L and the AQoL-8D. Data on lung function and disease specific HRQoL instruments were collected from the AIPFR. Performance of the two instruments was evaluated based on questionnaire practicality, agreement between the two instruments and test performance (internal and construct validity)., Results: Overall completion rates for the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D were 96% and 85%, respectively. Mean (median) HSUVs were 0.65 (0.70) and 0.69 (0.72) for the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D, respectively. There was reasonable agreement between the two instruments based on the Bland-Altman plot mean difference (-0.04) and intraclass correlation coefficient (0.84), however there were some fundamental differences. A larger range of values was observed with the EQ-5D-5L (-0.57-1.00 vs 0.16-1.00). The EQ-5D-5L had a greater divergent sensitivity and efficacy in relation to assessing HSUVs between clinical groupings. The AQoL-8D ,however, had a higher sensitivity to measure psychosocial aspects of HRQoL in IPF., Conclusion: The EQ-5D-5L demonstrated superior performance when compared to AQoL-8D in persons with IPF. This may be attributable to the high symptom burden which is physically debilitating to which the EQ-5D-5L may be more sensitive., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Challenges for the effective management of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) include difficulties with the early detection of disease, accurate prognostication with baseline data, and accurate and precise response to therapy. The purpose of this Review is to describe the clinical and research gaps in the diagnosis and prognosis of ILD, and how machine learning can be applied to image biomarker research to close these gaps. Machine-learning algorithms can identify ILD in at-risk populations, predict the extent of lung fibrosis, correlate radiological abnormalities with lung function decline, and be used as endpoints in treatment trials, exemplifying how this technology can be used in care for people with ILD. Advances in image processing and analysis provide further opportunities to use machine learning that incorporates deep-learning-based image analysis and radiomics. Collaboration and consistency are required to develop optimal algorithms, and candidate radiological biomarkers should be validated against appropriate predictors of disease outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SMH reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and NHLBI; service contracts from Calyx outside the present work; the US patent 10,706,533 Systems and Methods for Automatic Detection and Quantification of Pathology Using Dynamic Feature Classification (assigned to National Jewish Health and not licensed); grants and consulting fees from Veracyte; consulting fees from Lyra Therapeutics and IMIDEX; and payment or honorarium for attending the 2021 World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disease Conference. PMG reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Teva, Cipla, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings or travel from Brainomix; and stock options in Brainomix. DA reports consulting fees and speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim and Fonds de Recherche Québec–Santé. TJC reports grants or contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Biogen, and Three Lakes Foundation; consulting fees from, and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Bristol Myers Squibb; payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim; and is the cochair of Australian ILD Registry. KAJ reports grants or contracts from the University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Three Lakes Foundation, and the Chest Foundation; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pliant Therapeutics, Three Lakes Foundation, and Thyron; payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for the PFOX trial. LC reports payments or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim. AW reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Veracyte outside the submitted work; payment or honoraria from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim; and support for attending meetings or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim (or both). SW reports grants from National Institute for Health Research Clinician Scientist Award CS-2018-18-ST2-004; consulting fees and payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; a leadership or fiduciary role on NHS England AI Award Advisory Panel; and is the Radiology Lead for the Open Source Imaging Consortium. IG reports consulting fees from Ad Alta, Amplia, Accendatech, and Lassen; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim; and is the cochair of Australian ILD Registry. HB, JAM, MG, FF report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Prediction of disease course in patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of lung fibrosis extent quantified at computed tomography (CT) using data-driven texture analysis (DTA) in a large cohort of well-characterized patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) enrolled in a national registry., Methods: This retrospective analysis included participants in the Australian IPF Registry with available CT between 2007 and 2016. CT scans were analysed using the DTA method to quantify the extent of lung fibrosis. Demographics, longitudinal pulmonary function and quantitative CT metrics were compared using descriptive statistics. Linear mixed models, and Cox analyses adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking history and treatment with anti-fibrotics were performed to assess the relationships between baseline DTA, pulmonary function metrics and outcomes., Results: CT scans of 393 participants were analysed, 221 of which had available pulmonary function testing obtained within 90 days of CT. Linear mixed-effect modelling showed that baseline DTA score was significantly associated with annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, greater extent of lung fibrosis was associated with poorer transplant-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (HR 1.14, p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: In a multi-centre observational registry of patients with IPF, the extent of fibrotic abnormality on baseline CT quantified using DTA is associated with outcomes independent of pulmonary function., (© 2022 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Rationale: Reliable outcome prediction in patients with fibrotic lung disease using baseline high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) data remains challenging. Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic accuracy of a deep learning algorithm (SOFIA [Systematic Objective Fibrotic Imaging Analysis Algorithm]), trained and validated in the identification of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like features on HRCT (UIP probability), in a large cohort of well-characterized patients with progressive fibrotic lung disease drawn from a national registry. Methods: SOFIA and radiologist UIP probabilities were converted to Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED)-based UIP probability categories (UIP not included in the differential, 0-4%; low probability of UIP, 5-29%; intermediate probability of UIP, 30-69%; high probability of UIP, 70-94%; and pathognomonic for UIP, 95-100%), and their prognostic utility was assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Measurements and Main Results: In multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, guideline-based radiologic diagnosis, anddisease severity (using total interstitial lung disease [ILD] extent on HRCT, percent predicted FVC, Dl CO , or the composite physiologic index), only SOFIA UIP probability PIOPED categories predicted survival. SOFIA-PIOPED UIP probability categories remained prognostically significant in patients considered indeterminate ( n  = 83) by expert radiologist consensus (hazard ratio, 1.73; P  < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-2.14). In patients undergoing surgical lung biopsy ( n  = 86), after adjusting for guideline-based histologic pattern and total ILD extent on HRCT, only SOFIA-PIOPED probabilities were predictive of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.75; P  < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-2.25). Conclusions: Deep learning-based UIP probability on HRCT provides enhanced outcome prediction in patients with progressive fibrotic lung disease when compared with expert radiologist evaluation or guideline-based histologic pattern. In principle, this tool may be useful in multidisciplinary characterization of fibrotic lung disease. The utility of this technology as a decision support system when ILD expertise is unavailable requires further investigation.

The multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) has been endorsed in current international consensus guidelines as the gold standard method for diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD). In the absence of an accurate and reliable diagnostic test, the agreement between multidisciplinary meetings has been used as a surrogate marker for diagnostic accuracy. Although the ILD MDM has been shown to improve inter-clinician agreement on ILD diagnosis, result in a change in diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients and reduce unclassifiable diagnoses, the ideal form for an ILD MDM remains unclear, with constitution and processes of ILD MDMs varying greatly around the world. It is likely that this variation of practice contributes to the lack of agreement seen between MDMs, as well as suboptimal diagnostic accuracy. A recent Delphi study has confirmed the essential components required for the operation of an ILD MDM. The ILD MDM is a changing entity, as it incorporates new diagnostic tests and genetic markers, while also adapting in its form in response to the obstacles of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding ILD MDM and their role in the diagnosis of ILD, the practice of ILD MDM around the world, approaches to ILD MDM standardization and future directions to improve diagnostic accuracy in ILD., Competing Interests: LG has received travel and conference support from Boehringer Ingelheim. LT has provided paid consultancy for Erbe Elektromedezin and Boehringer Ingelheim. TC has received grant support, consultancy fees, and speaking honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche, consultancy fees from Bristol Myers Squibb; grant support from Biogen, and provides consultancy for DevPro and Ad Alta., (Copyright © 2022 Glenn, Troy and Corte.)

Background: The presence of emphysema is relatively common in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease. This has been designated combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). The lack of consensus over definitions and diagnostic criteria has limited CPFE research. Goals: The objectives of this task force were to review the terminology, definition, characteristics, pathophysiology, and research priorities of CPFE and to explore whether CPFE is a syndrome. Methods: This research statement was developed by a committee including 19 pulmonologists, 5 radiologists, 3 pathologists, 2 methodologists, and 2 patient representatives. The final document was supported by a focused systematic review that identified and summarized all recent publications related to CPFE. Results: This task force identified that patients with CPFE are predominantly male, with a history of smoking, severe dyspnea, relatively preserved airflow rates and lung volumes on spirometry, severely impaired Dl CO , exertional hypoxemia, frequent pulmonary hypertension, and a dismal prognosis. The committee proposes to identify CPFE as a syndrome, given the clustering of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, shared pathogenetic pathways, unique considerations related to disease progression, increased risk of complications (pulmonary hypertension, lung cancer, and/or mortality), and implications for clinical trial design. There are varying features of interstitial lung disease and emphysema in CPFE. The committee offers a research definition and classification criteria and proposes that studies on CPFE include a comprehensive description of radiologic and, when available, pathological patterns, including some recently described patterns such as smoking-related interstitial fibrosis. Conclusions: This statement delineates the syndrome of CPFE and highlights research priorities.

Background: When considering the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), experienced clinicians integrate clinical features that help to differentiate IPF from other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases, thus generating a "pre-test" probability of IPF. The aim of this international working group perspective was to summarize these features using a tabulated approach similar to chest HRCT and histopathologic patterns reported in the international guidelines for the diagnosis of IPF, and to help formally incorporate these clinical likelihoods into diagnostic reasoning to facilitate the diagnosis of IPF. Methods: The committee group identified factors that influence the clinical likelihood of a diagnosis of IPF, which was categorized as a pre-test clinical probability of IPF into "high" (70-100%), "intermediate" (30-70%), or "low" (0-30%). After integration of radiological and histopathological features, the post-test probability of diagnosis was categorized into "definite" (90-100%), "high confidence" (70-89%), "low confidence" (51-69%), or "low" (0-50%) probability of IPF. Findings: A conceptual Bayesian framework was created, integrating the clinical likelihood of IPF ("pre-test probability of IPF") with the HRCT pattern, the histopathology pattern when available, and/or the pattern of observed disease behavior, into a "post-test probability of IPF." The diagnostic probability of IPF was expressed using an adapted diagnostic ontology for fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. Interpretation: The present approach will help incorporate the clinical judgment into the diagnosis of IPF, thus facilitating the application of IPF diagnostic guidelines and, ultimately improving diagnostic confidence and reducing the need for invasive diagnostic techniques.

Approximately 12-13% of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are diagnosed with unclassifiable ILD (uILD), often despite thorough evaluation. A recent Phase 2 study (NCT03099187) described a significant effect of pirfenidone vs. placebo on forced vital capacity (FVC) measured by site spirometry in patients with progressive fibrosing uILD (hereafter referred to as the pirfenidone in uILD study). Here, we present the results from a post-hoc analysis of this study to assess patient baseline characteristics and the efficacy of pirfenidone vs. placebo analyzed by surgical lung biopsy (SLB) status. Mean FVC (mL) change over 24 weeks was included as a post-hoc efficacy outcome. Of 253 randomized patients, 88 (34.8%) had a SLB and 165 (65.2%) did not. Baseline characteristics were generally similar between SLB subgroups; however, patients who had a SLB were slightly younger and had a higher 6-min walk distance than those without a SLB. Mean FVC change over 24 weeks for pirfenidone vs. placebo was -90.9 vs. -146.3 mL, respectively, in patients who had a SLB, and 8.2 vs. -85.3 mL, respectively, in patients without a SLB. Overall, the results from the post-hoc analysis identified that pirfenidone may be an effective treatment in progressive fibrosing uILD over 24 weeks, irrespective of SLB status; however, caution should be taken when interpreting these data due to several limitations. There are differences in the treatment effect of pirfenidone between the subgroups that require further pathological and radiological investigation. In this manuscript, we also descriptively compared baseline characteristics from the overall pirfenidone in uILD study population with other uILD populations reported in the literature, with the aim of understanding if there are any similarities or differences within these cohorts. Most baseline characteristics for patients in the pirfenidone in uILD study were within the ranges reported in the literature; however, ranges were wide, highlighting the heterogeneity of uILD populations., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03099187., Competing Interests: MM-M or her institution has received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BRN, Chiesi, Esteve-Teijin Healthcare (ETH), GlaxoSmithKline, InterMune (a fully owned subsidiary of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. since 2014), and F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., outside the submitted work. MK has received fees for speaking and/or organizing education from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, ERS, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis; has received fees for consulting from Boehringer Ingelheim, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, and InterMune (a fully owned subsidiary of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. since 2014); and has received research funding, including institutional funding, from BMBF, Boehringer Ingelheim, DFG, the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Hopp Stiftung, InterMune (a fully owned subsidiary of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. since 2014), Lilly, Lungenfibrose E.V., Medac, Olympus, UKGM, and WATL. VC reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer/MSD, Celgene, Galapagos, Galecto, Novartis, Sanofi, and Shionogi; and personal fees and non-financial support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. and Promedior, Inc. (acquired by Roche in February 2020) outside the submitted work. TC has received unrestricted educational grants, travel assistance, and speaker fees from, and served on advisory boards for, Boehringer Ingelheim; has received unrestricted educational grants and speaker fees from, and served on advisory boards for, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.; has received unrestricted educational grants from Actelion, Ltd., Bayer, Galapagos, and Sanofi; and has served on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Promedior, Inc. (acquired by Roche in February 2020). FG is an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. K-UK and JA are employees and shareholders of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. TM has, via his institution, received industry-academic funding from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline R&D, and has received consultancy or speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Galapagos, Galecto, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, IQVIA, Pliant, Respivant, and Theravance., (Copyright © 2022 Molina-Molina, Kreuter, Cottin, Corte, Gilberg, Kirchgaessler, Axmann and Maher.)

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive lung disease in which circulatory biomarkers have the potential for guiding management in clinical practice. We assessed the prognostic role of serum biomarkers in three independent IPF cohorts: Australian Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Registry (AIPFR), Trent Lung Fibrosis (TLF) and Prospective Observation of Fibrosis in the Lung Clinical Endpoints (PROFILE)., Methods: In the AIPFR cohort, candidate proteins were assessed by ELISA as well as in an unbiased proteomic approach. LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression was used to restrict the selection of markers that best accounted for the progressor phenotype at 1 year in the AIPFR cohort, and subsequently prospectively selected for replication in the validation TLF cohort and assessed retrospectively in the PROFILE cohort. Four significantly replicating biomarkers were aggregated into a progression index model based on tertiles of circulating concentrations., Results: 189 participants were included in the AIPFR cohort, 205 participants from the TLF cohort and 122 participants from the PROFILE cohort. Differential biomarker expression was observed by ELISA and replicated for osteopontin, matrix metallopeptidase-7, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and periostin for those with a progressor phenotype at 1 year. Proteomic data did not replicate. The progression index in the AIPFR, TLF and PROFILE cohorts predicted risk of progression, mortality and progression-free survival. A statistical model incorporating the progression index demonstrated the capacity to distinguish disease progression at 12 months, which was increased beyond the clinical GAP (gender, age and physiology) score model alone in all cohorts, and significantly so within the incidence-based TLF and PROFILE cohorts., Conclusion: A panel of circulatory biomarkers can provide potentially valuable clinical assistance in the prognosis of IPF patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: B. Clynick has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T.J. Corte reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Roche, grants from Galapagos, Actelion and Bayer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H.E. Jo reports other (travel support and lecture fees) from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: I. Stewart has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I.N. Glaspole reports personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Grainge reports personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: T.M. Maher reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from UCB, grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bayer, Prometic, Samumed, Galapagos, Celgene, Indalo, Pliant, Blade Therapeutics, Respivant, Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb, other (stock options) from Apellis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: V. Navaratnam has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Hubbard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.M.A. Hopkins has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.N. Reynolds has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Chapman reports personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Zappala has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G.J. Keir has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W.A. Cooper has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.M. Mahar has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Ellis has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N.S. Goh reports grants from the National Health Medical Research Council (NHMRC) (APP1066128, APP114776) and the Centre of Research Excellence in Pulmonary Fibrosis (CRE-PF), Australia (NHMRC GNT116371; 2017-2021), during the conduct of the study; the PROFILE study was funded by the Medical Research Council (G0901226) and GlaxoSmithKline R&D (CRT114316). Conflict of interest: E. De Jong has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Cha has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.B.A. Tan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Leigh has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Oldmeadow has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.H. Walters has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R.G. Jenkins reports other (sponsored research agreements) from AstraZeneca, Biogen and Galecto, outside the submitted work; is on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, NuMedii, Promedior and Redex; reports lecture fees and consultancy for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Heptares, Pliant and Roche; and is a trustee for Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Conflict of interest: Y. Moodley reports personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Background: There are substantial advances in diagnosis and treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), but without much evidence available on recent mortality and survival trends., Methods: A narrative synthesis approach was used to investigate the mortality trends, then meta-analyses for survival trends were carried out based on various time periods., Results: Six studies reported the mortality data for IPF in 22 countries, and 62 studies (covering 63 307 patients from 20 countries) reported survival data for IPF. Age-standardised mortality for IPF varied from ∼0.5 to ∼12 per 100 000 population per year after year 2000. There were increased mortality trends for IPF in Australia, Brazil, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and UK, while Austria, Croatia, Denmark, Romania and the USA showed decreased mortality trends. The overall 3-year and 5-year cumulative survival rates (CSRs) were 61.8% (95% CI 58.7-64.9; I 2 =97.1%) and 45.6% (95% CI 41.5-49.7; I 2 =97.7%), respectively. Prior to 2010, the pooled 3-year CSR was 59.9% (95% CI 55.8-64.1; I 2 =95.8%), then not significantly (p=0.067) increased to 66.2% (95% CI 62.9-69.5; I 2 =92.6%) in the 2010s decade. After excluding three studies in which no patients received antifibrotics after year 2010, the pooled 3-year CSRs significantly (p=0.039) increased to 67.4% (95% CI 63.9-70.9; I 2 =93.1%) in the 2010s decade., Discussion: IPF is a diagnosis associated with high mortality. There was no observed increasing survival trend for patients with IPF before year 2010, with then a switch to an improvement, which is probably multifactorial., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: T.J. Corte reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman La Rochel grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb; grants from Avalyn Pharma and Biogen; and personal fees from Promedior, outside the submitted work. A.K.Y. Teoh reports conference fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and speaker fees from Roche outside the submitted work. The other co-authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Background and Objective: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is one of the most common forms of interstitial lung diseases. While studies have been conducted in other countries to determine the epidemiological burden of IPF, there is limited information in Australia. Our study aimed to address this gap and generate the first estimates for the mortality, incidence and prevalence of IPF in Australia., Methods: Estimates were generated by utilizing the novel Mortality Incidence Analysis Model (MIAMOD) method and software based on the illness-death model. Data inputs included population estimates and mortality data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) for the period 1997-2015 and participant data from the Australian IPF Registry (AIPFR). Projections were estimated for a 10-year period up to 2025., Results: Overall crude and age-standardized estimates for mortality were 5.9 and 6.3 per 100,000 population; incidence, 10.4 and 11.2 per 100,000 population; and prevalence, 32.6 and 35.1 per 100,000 population. Crude and age-standardized mortality, incidence and prevalence increased over the study period; however, they demonstrated a decreasing trend over the projected period. Persons older than 70 years constituted 9% of the population; however, they accounted for approximately 82%-83% of all deaths, incident and prevalent cases. All estimates were higher in males than in females., Conclusion: Our study provides the first estimates for incidence, prevalence and mortality of IPF in Australia. By reporting national estimates for IPF, our study addresses an information gap important for policy, planning and to help optimize the allocation of resources for the management of patients with IPF., (© 2021 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Introduction: There are currently no approved treatments solely for unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (uILD); however, a recent trial showed this population can benefit from pirfenidone. We report a subgroup analysis of this trial to assess the effects of immunomodulators (concomitant mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] and/or previous corticosteroids) with pirfenidone in patients with uILD., Methods: This was a multicenter, international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial of patients with progressive fibrosing uILD (NCT03099187). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg/day or placebo. This analysis assessed forced vital capacity (FVC) change from baseline measured using site spirometry (key secondary endpoint) and safety over 24 weeks by concomitant MMF use at randomization (pre-specified analysis) and/or previous corticosteroid use (post hoc analysis)., Results: Overall, 253 patients were randomized, including 45 (17.8%) patients (pirfenidone, n = 23; placebo, n = 22) receiving concomitant MMF with/without previous corticosteroids (MMF subgroup); 79 (31.2%) patients (pirfenidone, n = 44; placebo, n = 35) receiving previous corticosteroids without MMF (corticosteroids/no-MMF subgroup); and 129 (51.0%) patients (pirfenidone, n = 60; placebo, n = 69) not receiving concomitant MMF or previous corticosteroids (no-corticosteroids/no-MMF subgroup). At 24 weeks, difference in mean (95% confidence interval) FVC change from baseline between pirfenidone and placebo was - 55.4 mL (- 206.7, 96.0; P = 0.4645) in the MMF subgroup; 128.4 mL (- 6.4, 263.3; P = 0.0617) in the corticosteroids/no-MMF subgroup; and 115.5 mL (35.1, 195.9; P = 0.0052) in the no-corticosteroids/no-MMF subgroup. All subgroups generally exhibited a similar pattern of treatment-emergent adverse events., Conclusion: Although limited by design and small sample sizes, this analysis suggests pirfenidone may be less effective in patients with uILD receiving concomitant MMF, whereas a beneficial treatment effect was observed in patients not receiving concomitant MMF regardless of previous corticosteroid use. Pirfenidone was well tolerated regardless of MMF and/or corticosteroid use., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03099187., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) may represent undiagnosed early-stage or subclinical interstitial lung disease (ILD). ILA are often observed incidentally in patients who subsequently develop clinically overt ILD. There is limited information on consensus definitions for, and the appropriate evaluation of, ILA. Early recognition of patients with ILD remains challenging, yet critically important. Expert consensus could inform early recognition and referral., Research Question: Can consensus-based expert recommendations be identified to guide clinicians in the recognition, referral, and follow-up of patients with or at risk of developing early ILDs?, Study Design and Methods: Pulmonologists and radiologists with expertise in ILD participated in two iterative rounds of surveys. The surveys aimed to establish consensus regarding ILA reporting, identification of patients with ILA, and identification of populations that might benefit from screening for ILD. Recommended referral criteria and follow-up processes were also addressed. Threshold for consensus was defined a priori as ≥ 75% agreement or disagreement., Results: Fifty-five experts were invited and 44 participated; consensus was reached on 39 of 85 questions. The following clinically important statements achieved consensus: honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis indicate potentially progressive ILD; honeycombing detected during lung cancer screening should be reported as potentially significant (eg, with the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System "S-modifier" [Lung-RADS; which indicates clinically significant or potentially significant noncancer findings]), recommending referral to a pulmonologist in the radiology report; high-resolution CT imaging and full pulmonary function tests should be ordered if nondependent subpleural reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, centrilobular ground-glass nodules, or patchy ground-glass opacity are observed on CT imaging; patients with honeycombing or traction bronchiectasis should be referred to a pulmonologist irrespective of diffusion capacity values; and patients with systemic sclerosis should be screened with pulmonary function tests for early-stage ILD., Interpretation: Guidance was established for identifying clinically relevant ILA, subsequent referral, and follow-up. These results lay the foundation for developing practical guidance on managing patients with ILA., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterised by multi-system involvement with a wide variety of manifestations. Validated classification criteria are necessary to improve recognition and prevent misclassification, especially given the lack of reliable and standardised autoantibody testing. We systematically reviewed the literature to analyse proposed ASSD criteria, characteristics, and diagnostic performance., Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase databases (01/01/1984 to 06/11/2018) and the ACR and EULAR meeting abstracts (2017-2018). Sensitivities, specificities, positive, negative likelihood ratios and risk of bias were calculated for ASSD criteria and key variables reported in the literature. We performed meta-analysis when appropriate., Results: We retrieved 4,358 studies. We found 85 proposed ASSD criteria from a total of 82 studies. All but one study included anti-synthetase autoantibody (ARS) positivity in the ASSD criteria. Most studies required only one ASSD feature plus anti-ARS to define ASSD (n=64, 78%), whereas 16 studies required more than one ASSD variable plus anti-ARS. The only criteria not including anti-ARS positivity required 5 ASSD clinical features. We found limited data and wide variability in the diagnostic performance of each variable and definition proposed in the literature. Given these limitations we only meta-analysed the performance of individual muscle biopsy and clinical variables in diagnosing ASSD, which performed poorly., Conclusions: The current ASSD criteria include a variety of serological, clinical, and histological features with wide variability amongst proposed definitions and the performance of these definitions has not been tested. This systematic literature review suggests the need for additional data and consensus-driven classification criteria for ASSD.

Background and Objective: In Australia, little is known about delivery of care for people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study examined the organization of IPF care across Australia, how it aligns with guidance for best practice, and identified barriers and facilitators to best care., Methods: Data on the organization of IPF care in Australia were collected from public hospitals using a study-specific questionnaire between February and July 2020. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with respiratory physicians from around Australia between April and December 2020. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was undertaken., Results: Almost all hospitals (n = 38, 97%) held multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) for diagnosing IPF, with 90% of multidisciplinary teams including expert respiratory physicians and radiologists; however, rheumatologists, interstitial lung disease nurses and a histopathologist were often not available. More than 90% of institutions had access to oxygen therapy, pulmonary rehabilitation and advanced care planning, but access to psychological support and clinical trials was limited (53% and 58%, respectively). Fifteen respiratory physicians (27% regional) were interviewed. Approaches to diagnosis, treatment and access to referral services were generally consistent with best practice guidance; however, regional respondents reported barriers related to inadequate staffing, lack of a nurse coordinator, inadequate access to clinical trials and funding models. Telehealth technologies were perceived as facilitators to best care., Conclusion: Clinical management of IPF in Australia generally aligns with best practice guidance, but there may be some inequity of access to specialist services, particularly in regional areas, that should be addressed to ensure optimal care for all., (© 2021 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Rationale: The interstitial lung disease (ILD) multidisciplinary meetings (MDM), composed of pulmonologists, radiologists, and pathologists, is integral to the rendering of an accurate ILD diagnosis. However, there is significant heterogeneity in the conduct of ILD MDMs, and questions regarding their best practices remain unanswered. Objectives: To achieve consensus among ILD experts on essential components of an ILD MDM. Methods: Using a Delphi methodology, semi-structured interviews with ILD experts were used to identify key themes and features of ILD MDMs. These items informed two subsequent rounds of online questionnaires that were used to achieve consensus among a broader, international panel of ILD experts. Experts were asked to rate their level of agreement on a five-point Likert scale. An a priori threshold for consensus was set at a median score 4 or 5 with an interquartile range of 0. Results: We interviewed 15 ILD experts, and 102 ILD experts participated in the online questionnaires. Five items and two exploratory statements achieved consensus on being essential for an ILD MDM following two questionnaire rounds. There was consensus that the presence of at least one radiologist, a quiet setting with a visual projection system, a high-quality chest high-resolution computed tomography, and a standardized template summarizing collated patient data are essential components of an ILD MDM. Experts also agreed that it would be useful for ILD MDMs to undergo an annual benchmarking process and a validation process by fulfilling a minimum number of cases annually. Twenty-seven additional features were considered to be either highly desirable or desirable features based on the degree of consensus. Although our findings on desirable features are similar to the current literature, several of these remain controversial and warrant further research. The study also showed an agreement among participants on several future concepts to improve the ILD MDM, such as performing regular self-assessments and conducting research into shared practices to develop an international expert guideline statement on ILD MDMs. Conclusions: This Delphi study showed consensus among international ILD experts on essential and desirable features of an ILD MDM. Our data represent an important step toward potential collaborative research into future standardization of ILD MDMs.

Fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) frequently have nonspecific and overlapping clinical and radiological features, resulting in ∼10-20% of patients with ILD lacking a clear diagnosis and thus being labelled with unclassifiable ILD. The objective of this review is to describe how patients with unclassifiable ILD should be evaluated, and what impact specific clinical, radiological and histopathological features may have on management decisions, focusing on patients with a predominantly fibrotic phenotype. We highlight recent data that have suggested an increasing role for antifibrotic medications in a variety of fibrotic ILDs, but justify the ongoing importance of making an accurate ILD diagnosis given the benefit of immunomodulatory therapies in many patient populations. We provide a practical approach to support management decisions that can be used by clinicians and tested by clinical researchers, and further identify the need for additional research to support a rational and standardised approach to the management of patients with unclassifiable ILD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C.J. Ryerson reports personal fees from Veracyte, research funding, grant support, and speaking honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffmann-La Roche, speaking honoraria from Cipla Ltd, and consultancy fees from Pliant Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: T.J. Corte reports grant support, consultancy fees, and speaking honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche; grant support from Gilead, Biogen, Bayer, InterMune, Actelion, Galapagos and Avalyn Pharma; and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Promedior and Ad Alta, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.L. Myers has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.L.F. Walsh reports research funding from the National Institute of Health and Research; research funding, consultancy fees, and speaking honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffmann-La Roche and Galapagos; consultancy fees from The Open Source Imaging Consortium, FLUIDDA, Medscape, Verocyte and Sanofi-Genzyme; speaking honoraria from Bracco, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S.A. Guler reports grant support and speaking honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffmann-La Roche, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2021.)

Introduction: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF, progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILD), are associated with a progressive loss of lung function and a poor prognosis. Treatment with antifibrotic agents can slow, but not halt, disease progression, and treatment discontinuation because of adverse events is common. Fibrotic diseases such as these can be mediated by lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which signals via six LPA receptors (LPA 1-6 ). Signalling via LPA 1 appears to be fundamental in the pathogenesis of fibrotic diseases. BMS-986278, a second-generation LPA 1 antagonist, is currently in phase 2 development as a therapy for IPF and PF-ILD., Methods and Analysis: This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, international trial will include adults with IPF or PF-ILD. The trial will consist of a 42-day screening period, a 26-week placebo-controlled treatment period, an optional 26-week active-treatment extension period, and a 28-day post-treatment follow-up. Patients in both the IPF (n=240) and PF-ILD (n=120) cohorts will be randomised 1:1:1 to receive 30 mg or 60 mg BMS-986278, or placebo, administered orally two times per day for 26 weeks in the placebo-controlled treatment period. The primary endpoint is rate of change in per cent predicted forced vital capacity from baseline to week 26 in the IPF cohort., Ethics and Dissemination: This study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines, Declaration of Helsinki principles, and local ethical and legal requirements. Results will be reported in a peer-reviewed publication., Trial Registration Number: NCT04308681., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TJC has served on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffman-LaRoche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ad-Alta, Promedior and Prometic Life Sciences. Her institution has received grants or research fees from Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galápagos and Hoffman-La Roche, outside the submitted work. LL has served on advisory boards for United Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Galápagos, Genentech and DevPro Biopharma; and has received research funding from Biogen, Celgene, Novartis, Bellerophon Therapeutics, Galecto, Bristol Myers Squibb, Respivant Sciences, Galápagos, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Pliant Therapeutics; and has provided disease-state education for Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics and Veracyte. JJS receives honoraria from Genentech for giving unbranded, disease-state talks on IPF; he also receives grant support from Genentech and Boehringer Ingelheim. He is a paid consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim and an unpaid consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb. TMM has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galápagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Indalo Therapeutics, Pliant Therapeutics, Roche, and UCB, outside the submitted work. His institution received grants or research fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline and UCB outside the submitted work. JGG is the founder of MedQIA, LLC. SMP has consulted or served on advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb and Altavant; and has received research funding to Duke from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. TS has served on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb and has received an honorarium and research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim. TO has served on advisory boards for Bristol Myers Squibb and has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Shionogi, Astellas Pharma and Toray industries. AM is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb. XZ, GST, BE, HX, HW, RAS, EDC and AF are all employees of Bristol Myers Squibb., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)