Search

Despite evidence of benefits beyond those of oral antipsychotics, long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are underused in schizophrenia treatment. Underuse may be partially a result of misconceptions held by some healthcare professionals (HCPs) pertaining to LAIs. A panel of four experts convened between January 2022 and May 2022 to identify these misconceptions, and example cases or scenarios were created to illustrate common clinical situations relevant to these beliefs. Ultimately, an online platform and heuristic tool, Schizophrenia Clinical Outcome Scenarios and Patient-Provider Engagement (S.C.O.P.E.™), was developed to help prescribing clinicians and other HCPs better understand common clinical dilemmas, as well as the place for LAIs in schizophrenia treatment. Three main misconceptions related to the use of LAIs to treat schizophrenia were identified and included "physicians/providers know when patients are nonadherent", "patients do not accept/want LAI treatment", and "LAIs are only appropriate for patients who have demonstrated nonadherence". All misconceptions are refuted by current evidence and were used to develop clinical scenarios with questions to consider when patients present to various sites of care for treatment. These cases are presented on the S.C.O.P.E. educational platform. The platform also includes videos designed to help non-prescribing HCPs and mental health professionals address patient/caregiver concerns and to communicate LAI benefits. In addition, S.C.O.P.E. provides a section with information about each LAI that is currently FDA approved in the United States for the treatment of schizophrenia, to help familiarize HCPs with characteristics of LAIs. S.C.O.P.E. is an educational tool designed for HCPs to help improve their understanding of how to manage common clinical dilemmas in the treatment of people with schizophrenia, to clarify the role of LAIs in medication management, and to increase understanding of the characteristics of available LAIs. S.C.O.P.E. also aims to improve care in schizophrenia by facilitating increased awareness to patients and caregivers., Competing Interests: CUC has been a consultant for or has received honoraria from AbbVie, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini Pharma, Aristo Pharma, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel Therapeutics, CNX Therapeutics, COMPASS Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo Biopharma, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Karuna Therapeutics, LB Pharmaceuticals, Laboratorios Farmacéuticos ROVI, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedinCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Maplight, Mylan, Neumora Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Neurelis, Newron Pharmaceuticals, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Sunovion, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Viatris; has provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka and served on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for COMPASS Pathways, Denovo Biopharma, Laboratorios Farmacéuticos ROVI, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Sage Therapeutics, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Tolmar, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda and received royalties from UpToDate; serves on the board of directors for the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology; and is a stock option shareholder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, LB Pharmaceuticals, PsiloSterics, and Quantic Group. JMR has been a consultant for and has received support for attending meetings/travel from Teva Pharmaceuticals; has received honoraria from Lundbeck; has received grants from Alkermes, Janssen, Karuna, and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); has received royalties/licensing fees from UpToDate; and owns stock/stock options in Doximity. LC is a consultant for AbbVie/Allergan, Acadia, Adamas, Alkermes, Angelini, Astellas, Avanir, Axsome, BioXcel, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cadent Therapeutics, Cerevel, Clinilabs, COMPASS, Delpor, Eisai, Enteris BioPharma, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, INmune Bio, Impel, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Janssen, Karuna, Lundbeck, Lyndra, Medavante-ProPhase, Marvin, Merck, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Noema, Novartis, Noven, Otsuka, Ovid, Praxis, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Sage, Sunovion, Supernus, Teva, and University of Arizona, Vanda, Wells Fargo, and provides one-off ad hoc consulting for individuals/entities conducting marketing, commercial, or scientifi c scoping research; is a speaker for AbbVie/Allergan, Acadia, Alkermes, Angelini, Axsome, BioXcel, Eisai, Idorsia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Janssen, Lundbeck, Neurocrine, Noven, Otsuka, Recordati, Sage, Sunovion, Takeda, Teva, and CME activities organized by medical education companies, such as Medscape, NACCME, NEI, Vindico, and universities and professional organizations/societies; holds stocks (small number of shares of common stock) in Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and Pfizer, purchased over 10 years ago, with stock options in Reviva; receives royalties/publishing income from Taylor & Francis (Editor-in-Chief, Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2022–present), Wiley (Editor-in-Chief, International Journal of Clinical Practice, through the end of 2019), UpToDate (reviewer), Springer Healthcare (book), and Elsevier (Topic Editor, Psychiatry, Clinical Therapeutics). MAM, ST, KRF, and MS are employees or stockholders, or both, of Teva Pharmaceuticals. SK is an employee of Yorker Health, which has received payments from Teva Pharmaceuticals in relation to this study. JMK has been a consultant for or received honoraria from Alkermes, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerevel, Click Therapeutics, Dainippon Sumitomo, HealthRhythms, HLS Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, EnVivo Pharmaceuticals (Forum), Forest (Allergan), Genentech, Indivior, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Karuna Therapeutics, LB Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Lyndra Therapeutics, Mapi, Maplight, Merck, Neurocrine Biosciences, Minerva, Neurocrine, Newron, Novartis, NW PharmaTech, Otsuka, Pierre Fabre, Reviva Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Saladax Biomedical, Sunovion, Takeda, Terran, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; has received grant support from Otsuka, Lundbeck, and Janssen; and is a shareholder of Cerevel, North Shore Therapeutics, LB Pharmaceuticals and Vanguard Research Group; has received royalties from UpToDate., (© 2024 Correll et al.)

The recent unprecedented progress in ageing research and drug discovery brings together fundamental research and clinical applications to advance the goal of promoting healthy longevity in the human population. We, from the gathering at the Aging Research and Drug Discovery Meeting in 2023, summarised the latest developments in healthspan biotechnology, with a particular emphasis on artificial intelligence (AI), biomarkers and clocks, geroscience, and clinical trials and interventions for healthy longevity. Moreover, we provide an overview of academic research and the biotech industry focused on targeting ageing as the root of age-related diseases to combat multimorbidity and extend healthspan. We propose that the integration of generative AI, cutting-edge biological technology, and longevity medicine is essential for extending the productive and healthy human lifespan.

Introduction: People with severe mental illness have poor cardiometabolic health. Commonly used antidepressants and antipsychotics frequently lead to weight gain, which may further contribute to adverse cardiovascular outcomes., Areas Covered: We searched MEDLINE up to April 2023 for umbrella reviews, (network-)meta-analyses, trials and cohort studies on risk factors, prevention and treatment strategies of weight gain associated with antidepressants/antipsychotics. We developed 10 clinical recommendations., Expert Opinion: To prevent, manage, and treat antidepressant/antipsychotic-related weight gain, we recommend i) assessing risk factors for obesity before treatment, ii) monitoring metabolic health at baseline and regularly during follow-up, iii) offering lifestyle interventions including regular exercise and healthy diet based on patient preference to optimize motivation, iv) considering first-line psychotherapy for mild-moderate depression and anxiety disorders, v)choosing medications based on medications' and patient's weight gain risk, vi) choosing medications based on acute vs long-term treatment, vii) using effective, tolerated medications, viii) switching to less weight-inducing antipsychotics/antidepressants where possible, ix) using early weight gain as a predictor of further weight gain to inform the timing of intervention/switch options, and x) considering adding metformin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, or topiramate(second-line due to potential adverse cognitive effects) to antipsychotics, or aripiprazole to clozapine or olanzapine.

Background: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is frequently prescribed for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Despite the inconsistent findings on efficacy, APP may be beneficial for subgroups of psychotic patients. This meta-analysis of individual patient data investigated moderators of efficacy and tolerability of APP in adult patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders., Design: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Trials until September 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials comparing APP with antipsychotic monotherapy. We estimated the effects with a one-stage approach for patient-level moderators and a two-stage approach for study-level moderators, using (generalized) linear mixed-effects models. Primary outcome was treatment response, defined as a reduction of 25 % or more in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score. Secondary outcomes were study discontinuation, and changes from baseline on the PANSS total score, its positive and negative symptom subscale scores, the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and adverse effects., Results: We obtained individual patient data from 10 studies (602 patients; 31 % of all possible patients) and included 599 patients in our analysis. A higher baseline PANSS total score increased the chance of a response to APP (OR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.02; 1.94, p = 0.037 per 10-point increase in baseline PANSS total), mainly driven by baseline positive symptoms. The same applied to changes on the PANSS positive symptom subscale and the CGI severity scale. Extrapyramidal side effects increased significantly where first and second-generation antipsychotics were co-prescribed. Study discontinuation was comparable between both treatment arms., Conclusions: APP was effective in severely psychotic patients with high baseline PANSS total scores and predominantly positive symptoms. This effect must be weighed against potential adverse effects., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Anıl Yağcıoğlu has served as a speaker/advisory board member for Janssen, Abdi İbrahim Otsuka, Boehringer Ingelheim, Santa Farma, Nobel and has been an investigator for Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Kasper served in the past 3 years as a consultant or on advisory boards for Angelini, Biogen, Boehringer, Esai, Janssen, IQVIA, Mylan, Recordati, Rovi, Sage and Schwabe; and he has served on speakers bureaus for Angelini, Aspen Farmaceutica S.A., Biogen, Janssen, Recordati, Schwabe, Servier, Sothema, and Sun Pharma. Dr. R.E. Nielsen has received funding for research or has been an investigator for H. Lundbeck, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Compass, Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen-Cilag. Furthermore, REN has received speakers fee from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Servier, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Teva and Eli Lilly. Dr. Remington has received research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), University of Toronto, and HLS Therapeutics Inc. Dr. Schmidt-Kaepelin is patent holder of patent No.: 102020106962, and has received speakers honoraria by Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Correll has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic. Lochmann van Bennekom, IntHout, Gijsman, Akdede, Barnes, Galling, Gueorguieva, Kreinin, J. Nielsen, Repo-Tiihonen, Shafti, Xiao and Verkes reported no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

To assess the effect of Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics in acutely ill patients, we systematically searched major databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LAIs with other LAIs, oral antipsychotics, or placebo in acutely symptomatic adults with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Data were analyzed with a random-effects network meta-analysis. Co-primary outcomes were efficacy (mean change in psychopathology rating scales) and acceptability (all-cause discontinuations) at study endpoint. Of 25 RCTs, 19 studies tested second-generation LAIs (SGA-LAIs) and six first-generation LAIs (FGA-LAIs). Due to a disconnected network, FGA-LAIs were analyzed separately, with poor data quality. The SGA-LAIs network included 8,418 individuals (males=63%, mean age=39.3 years). All SGA-LAIs outperformed placebo in reducing acute symptoms at study endpoint (median follow-up=13 weeks). They were more acceptable than placebo with the only exception of olanzapine, for which no differences with placebo emerged. Additionally, we distinguished between different LAI formulations of the same antipsychotic to explore potential pharmacokinetic differences. Most formulations outperformed placebo in the very short-term (2 weeks or less), regardless of the need for initial oral supplementation. SGA-LAIs are evidence-based treatments in acutely ill individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Findings support the use of SGA-LAIs to manage psychopathology and improve adherence right from the acute phases of illness., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CU Correll has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Maplight, Mylan, Neumora Therapeutics, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Saladax, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, Viatris and Xenon Pharmaceuticals. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Antipsychotic drugs (particularly clozapine) have been associated with pneumonia in observational studies. Despite studies of the associations between antipsychotic use and incident pneumonia, it remains unclear to what degree antipsychotic use is associated with increased risk of pneumonia, whether dose-response associations exist, and what agents are specifically associated with incident pneumonia., Objective: To estimate pneumonia risk associated with specific antipsychotics and examine whether polytherapy, dosing, and receptor binding properties are associated with pneumonia in patients with schizophrenia., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study identified patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (hereafter, schizophrenia) aged 16 years or older from nationwide Finnish registers from 1972 to 2014. Data on diagnoses, inpatient care, and specialized outpatient care were obtained from the Hospital Discharge Register. Information on outpatient medication dispensing was obtained from the Prescription Register. Study follow-up was from 1996 to 2017. Data were analyzed from November 4, 2022, to December 5, 2023., Exposures: Use of specific antipsychotic monotherapies; antipsychotics modeled by dosage as low (<0.6 of the World Health Organization defined daily dose [DDD] per day), medium (0.6 to <1.1 DDDs per day), or high dose (≥1.1 DDDs per day); antipsychotic polypharmacy; and antipsychotics categorized according to their anticholinergic burden as low, medium, and high., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hospitalization for incident pneumonia. Pneumonia risk was analyzed using adjusted, within-individual Cox proportional hazards regression models, with no antipsychotic use as the reference., Results: The study included 61 889 persons with schizophrenia (mean [SD] age, 46.2 [16.0] years; 31 104 men [50.3%]). During 22 years of follow-up, 8917 patients (14.4%) had 1 or more hospitalizations for pneumonia and 1137 (12.8%) died within 30 days of admission. Compared with no antipsychotic use, any antipsychotic use overall was not associated with pneumonia (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.12; 95% CI, 0.99-1.26). Monotherapy use was associated with increased pneumonia risk compared with no antipsychotic use (AHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.02-1.30]; P = .03) in a dose-dependent manner, but polytherapy use was not. When categorized by anticholinergic burden, only the use of antipsychotics with a high anticholinergic burden was associated with pneumonia (AHR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.10-1.45]; P < .001). Of specific drugs, high-dose quetiapine (AHR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.22-2.60]; P = .003), high- and medium-dose clozapine (AHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.22-1.71]; P < .001 and AHR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.18-1.74]; P < .001, respectively), and high-dose olanzapine (AHR, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.05-1.58]; P = .02) were associated with increased pneumonia risk., Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that in patients with schizophrenia, antipsychotic agents associated with pneumonia include not only clozapine (at dosages ≥180 mg/d) but also quetiapine (≥440 mg/d) and olanzapine (≥11 mg/d). Moreover, monotherapy antipsychotics and antipsychotics with high anticholinergic burden are associated with increased pneumonia risk in a dose-dependent manner. These findings call for prevention strategies aimed at patients with schizophrenia requiring high-risk antipsychotics.

Objective: Youth with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD) are frequently prescribed second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Nonadherence to treatment often results in increased mood symptoms and diminished quality of life. We examined SGA adherence rates and adherence barriers among youth who have overweight/obesity and are diagnosed with BSD enrolled in a multisite pragmatic clinical trial. Methods: SGA adherence and adherence barriers at baseline via patient- and caregiver report was assessed. Adherence was defined as taking ≥70% of prescribed SGA doses in the past week. The weighted Kappa statistic was used to measure child-caregiver agreement about adherence rates, barriers, and caregiver assistance. Regression analyses were used to examine associations of caregiver assistance, age, sex, race, insurance status, dosing frequency, and number of concomitant medications with adherence. Barriers to adherence were analyzed separately for youth and their caregivers, using logistic regression to assess associations between informant-reported barriers and informant-reported adherence. Results: Participants included 1485 patients and/or caregivers. At baseline, 88.6% of patients self-reported as adherent; 92.0% of caregivers reported their child was adherent. Concordance between patients and caregivers was moderate ( k = 0.42). Approximately, 50% of the sample reported no adherence barriers. Frequently endorsed barriers included forgetting, side effects, being embarrassed to take medications, and preferring to do something else. Concordance between informants regarding adherence barriers was weak ( k = 0.05-0.36). Patients and caregivers who did not endorse adherence barriers reported higher adherence than those who endorsed barriers. Male sex and having once daily dosing of medications were associated with lower adherence. Discussion: One-week patient- and caregiver-reported adherence was high in this sample. Half of the sample reported adherence barriers. Most commonly endorsed barriers were forgetting, side effects, being embarrassed, and preferring to do something else. Caregivers and patients have unique perspectives regarding adherence barriers. Understanding and addressing treatment barriers in clinical practice may facilitate adherence.

There is no multi-country/multi-language study testing a-priori multivariable associations between non-modifiable/modifiable factors and validated wellbeing/multidimensional mental health outcomes before/during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, studies during COVID-19 pandemic generally do not report on representative/weighted non-probability samples. The Collaborative Outcomes study on Health and Functioning during Infection Times (COH-FIT) is a multi-country/multi-language survey conducting multivariable/LASSO-regularized regression models and network analyses to identify modifiable/non-modifiable factors associated with wellbeing (WHO-5)/composite psychopathology (P-score) change. It enrolled general population-representative/weighted-non-probability samples (26/04/2020-19/06/2022). Participants included 121,066 adults (age=42±15.9 years, females=64 %, representative sample=29 %) WHO-5/P-score worsened (SMD=0.53/SMD=0.74), especially initially during the pandemic. We identified 15 modifiable/nine non-modifiable risk and 13 modifiable/three non-modifiable protective factors for WHO-5, 16 modifiable/11 non-modifiable risk and 10 modifiable/six non-modifiable protective factors for P-score. The 12 shared risk/protective factors with highest centrality (network-analysis) were, for non-modifiable factors, country income, ethnicity, age, gender, education, mental disorder history, COVID-19-related restrictions, urbanicity, physical disorder history, household room numbers and green space, and socioeconomic status. For modifiable factors, we identified medications, learning, internet, pet-ownership, working and religion as coping strategies, plus pre-pandemic levels of stress, fear, TV, social media or reading time, and COVID-19 information. In multivariable models, for WHO-5, additional non-modifiable factors with |B|>1 were income loss, COVID-19 deaths. For modifiable factors we identified pre-pandemic levels of social functioning, hobbies, frustration and loneliness, and social interactions as coping strategy. For P-scores, additional non-modifiable/modifiable factors were income loss, pre-pandemic infection fear, and social interactions as coping strategy. COH-FIT identified vulnerable sub-populations and actionable individual/environmental factors to protect well-being/mental health during crisis times. Results inform public health policies, and clinical practice., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Conflict of interest statements of all authors are detailed in eTable 12., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Many studies have shown that COVID-19 caused many problems in mental health. This paper presents the results of the Cyprus sample, part of the global initiative named "The Collaborative Outcomes Study on Health and Functioning during Infection Times" (COH-FIT). Methods: The study took place from April 2019 to January 2022, using the Greek version of the online standard COH-FIT questionnaire on 917 Cypriot adults. Weighted t -tests were applied to test the differences between pre-pandemic and intra-pandemic scores using the anesrake package. Results: Participant responses indicated a significant negative impact of the pandemic on measures of mental health (-7.55; 95% CI: -9.01 to -6.07), with worsening in the scores for anxiety (12.05; 95% CI: 9.33 to 14.77), well-being (-11.06; 95% CI: -12.69 to -9.45) and depression (4.60; 95% CI: 2.06 to 7.14). Similar negative effects were observed for feelings of anger (12.92; 95% CI: 10.54 to 15.29), helplessness (9.66; 95% CI: 7.25 to 12.07), fear (22.25; 95% CI: 19.25 to 25.26), and loneliness (12.52; 95% CI: 9.94 to15.11). Increased use of social media (0.89; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.09), internet (0.86; 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.04), and substance consumption (0.06; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.11) were reported, along with a significant decrease in physical health (-3.45; 95% CI: -4.59 to -2.32), self-care (-7.10; 95% CI: -9.00 to -5.20), and social function (-11.27; 95% CI: -13.19 to -9.35), including support (-0.72; 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.34) and family function (-7.97; 95% CI: -9.90 to -6.05). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the daily life and emotional well-being of Cypriots. Identifying factors that influence vulnerability and resilience is essential to prioritize mental health support and address the long-term effects of the pandemic.

Studies demonstrated increased obstetric and neonatal complications in women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (SSD), but most inadequately addressed confounders and rarely considered antipsychotic effects. We conducted a meta-analysis and a population-based cohort study evaluating associations of adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes with SSD and prenatal antipsychotic use. In the meta-analysis, we searched four databases from inception to October-31-2023 and generated pooled risk estimates using random-effect models. In the cohort study, we identified women aged 15-50 years with SSD-diagnosis from electronic-heath-record database of public healthcare-services who delivered first/singleton children between 2003 and 2018 in Hong Kong. Propensity-score weighted regression-analyses incorporating important confounders including maternal pre-existing and gestational morbidities, substance/alcohol abuse, and psychotropic use, were performed to assess risk of adverse obstetric/neonatal outcomes in SSD-women versus non-SSD-women, and subsequently treated-SSD and untreated-SSD subgroups to disentangle effects of SSD from antipsychotic exposure. The meta-analysis (studies = 18, women = 37,214,330, including 42,926 SSD-women) found significant associations of SSD with 12 of 17 analyzed negative obstetric/neonatal outcomes (with pooled relative risk ranged:1.12-2.10), including placental complications, induced labor, Caesarean delivery, fetal distress, stillbirth, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age, low birth weight, low APGAR scores, neonatal and post-neonatal deaths. However, the cohort study (466,358 women, including 804 SSD-women) revealed that elevated risk of most study outcomes in unadjusted-models were markedly-attenuated or became non-significant in propensity-score weighted adjusted-models, except index-delivery hospitalization ≥7 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.76 [95% CI = 1.33-2.34]), preterm birth (OR = 1.48 [95% CI = 1.09-2.00]) and neonatal special-care admission (OR = 1.65 [95% CI = 1.35-2.01]). Apart from higher neonatal special-care admission in treated-SSD than untreated-SSD women (OR = 1.75 [95% CI = 1.23-2.52]), no significant between-group differences emerged in other outcomes. In sum, elevated risk of most obstetric/neonatal complications reported in SSD-women might largely be explained by maternal physical comorbidities, substance/alcohol use disorders and other confounders. Interventions targeting modifiable maternal risk factors should be incorporated in prenatal care for SSD-women to minimize avoidable adverse outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

The risk of fatal choking for people with schizophrenia and associations with antipsychotic medication are largely unknown. Therefore, we calculated the choking-related standardized mortality ratio for schizophrenia relative to the general population (SMR choking ). We also computed adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of choking-related mortality for antipsychotics in a nationwide cohort of patients with schizophrenia (N = 59,916). SMR choking was 20.5 (95 % confidence interval (CI)=17.1-23.9). The aHR was 1.74 (95 %CI=1.19-2.55) for strong dopamine 2-antagonists. For other antipsychotics, CIs included 1. Importantly, aHRs were particularly high for high dose categories of strong dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) antagonists. In conclusion, a schizophrenia diagnosis is associated with a 20-fold risk of death due to choking. This risk is elevated during use of strong D2R antagonist antipsychotics, particularly when prescribed in high dosages., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest AT, HT, and JT have participated in research projects funded by grants from Janssen-Cilag and Eli Lilly to their employing institution. JT has been a consultant to HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Orion and WebMed Global and received lecture fees from Janssen and Otsuka. HT has received lecture fees Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Lundbeck and Otsuka. CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Maplight, Mylan, Neumora, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic. AH: editor of the German (DGPPN) schizophrenia treatment guidelines, first author of the WFSBP schizophrenia treatment guidelines; on advisory boards of and speaker fees from AbbVie (speaker fees only), Advanz (speaker fees only), Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Recordati, Rovi, and Otsuka. ML has received honoraria from Janssen, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Recordati and Sunovion. The other authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Stepped, evidence-based and integrated care service models have the potential to be used as a reference for mental health services. RECOVER aimed to evaluate cost savings, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of such a model within a two arm, assessor- and data analysist-blinded RCT in Hamburg, Germany. Participants aged 16-79 years with mental disorders were randomly assigned either to RECOVER or treatment as usual (TAU). Primary outcomes comprised costs, effectiveness (combined symptoms, functioning, quality of life), and cost-effectiveness, hierarchically ordered. Outcomes were evaluated according to the ITT principle, group differences regarding costs with adjusted generalized linear models, effectiveness with ANCOVA models, and cost-effectiveness with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs). Between 1/1/2018 and 12/31/2020, n = 891 were finally included (n = 477 in RECOVER, n = 444 in TAU). RECOVER was associated with significantly lower annual total costs (-22 %), health and social care costs (-25 %) and hospital costs (-50 %). Effectiveness analyses showed a significantly better outcome for RECOVER with the fully imputed data . The CEACs descriptively demonstrated that RECOVER was cost-effective with a probability of >95 %. Treatment in RECOVER resulted in substantial cost reductions with better cost-effectiveness. RECOVER can be recommended as a reference model for comprehensive and integrated mental health services., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest ML: consultant or speaker fees AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Janssen Cilag GmbH, Lundbeck GmbH, Otsuka Pharma GmbH, Roche Deutschland Holding GmbH, Sanovi Aventis, Trommsdorff GmbH & Co KG. AK: consultant or speaker fees from Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Janssen Cilag GmbH, Lundbeck GmbH, Otsuka Pharma GbmH, Laboratorios Farmacéuticos Rovi, Takeda GmbH, Shares of MiNDNET e-Health AG, MiNDNET e-Health-Solutions GmbH JG: speaker fees from Lundbeck GmbH, Otsuka Pharma GmbH, Janssen Cilag GmbH. AR: speaker fees Pfizer Pharma GmbH. CUC: has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Supernus, Tolmar and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, LB Pharma, PsiloSterics and Quantic. DL: speaker fees Janssen Cilag GmbH All other authors have no conflicts of interest to report. Conflict of Interest or Competing Interest do not exist in relation to the RECOVER study and in relation to the report of the results in this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Ethical Considerations of Including Minors in Clinical Trials Using the Example of the Indicated Prevention of Psychotic Disorders Abstract: As a vulnerable group, minors require special protection in studies. For this reason, researchers are often reluctant to initiate studies, and ethics committees are reluctant to authorize such studies. This often excludes minors from participating in clinical studies. This exclusion can lead to researchers and clinicians receiving only incomplete data or having to rely on adult-based findings in the treatment of minors. Using the example of the study "Computer-Assisted Risk Evaluation in the Early Detection of Psychotic Disorders" (CARE), which was conducted as an 'other clinical investigation' according to the Medical Device Regulation, we present a line of argumentation for the inclusion of minors which weighs the ethical principles of nonmaleficence (especially regarding possible stigmatization), beneficence, autonomy, and fairness. We show the necessity of including minors based on the development-specific differences in diagnostics and early intervention. Further, we present specific protective measures. This argumentation can also be transferred to other disorders with the onset in childhood and adolescence and thus help to avoid excluding minors from appropriate evidence-based care because of insufficient studies.

Abstract ., Objective: To conduct a targeted literature review to examine the impact of cognitive impairment and negative symptoms among patients with schizophrenia treated in the United States across a range of outcomes pertinent to the US health care system decision-makers, such as payers and policy-makers., Data Sources: The authors searched EMBASE and PubMed from January 2012 to January 2024. Search terms included schizophrenia, cognitive impairment and negative symptoms, and direct medical and nonmedical, indirect, and societal outcomes., Study Selection: Considered for inclusion were US-based studies reporting on the relationship between cognitive impairment or negative symptoms and direct medical and nonmedical, indirect, and societal outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. A total of 4,212 articles were initially identified for screening., Data Extraction: One reviewer extracted data and another reviewer ensured studies met Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design-Time Period (PICOS-T) criteria for inclusion and exclusion., Results: Eight studies (n = 262,683) were included that reported specifically on associations between cognitive impairment or negative symptoms and targeted outcomes. Patients with schizophrenia and moderate/severe cognitive impairment had a 100% increase in relapse-related hospitalizations (0.6 vs 0.3, adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.85, P < .05) and ER visits (0.4 vs 0.2, adjusted odds ratio = 1.77, P < .05) vs patients with no/mild cognitive impairment. Additionally, there was an almost 50% increase in outpatient visits (8.4 vs 5.5, P < .001) and inpatient admissions (6.8 vs 4.5, P < .001) over the study period (2014 Q1-2017 Q4) for patients with negative symptoms vs without negative symptoms. Direct nonmedical, indirect, and societal outcomes are described., Conclusions: This review highlights the economic burden of cognitive impairment and negative symptoms by focusing on outcomes relevant to health care decision-makers in the United States., (© Copyright 2024 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: To compare second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and mood stabilizers (MSs) in youth with a bipolar disorder type I (BD-I) manic/mixed episode., Method: A systematic PubMed/Embase/PsycInfo literature search until December 31, 2023, for randomized trials of SGAs or MSs in patients ≤18 years of age with BD-I manic/mixed episode was conducted. The study included a network meta-analysis comparing treatments regarding mania symptoms and mania response (co-primary outcomes), and secondary efficacy and tolerability outcomes., Results: Eighteen studies (n = 2844, mean age = 11.74, female participants = 48.0%, mean study duration = 5.4 weeks) comparing 6 SGAs (aripiprazole, asenapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone) and 4 MSs (lithium, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and valproate) were meta-analyzed. All 6 SGAs outperformed placebo in reducing manic symptomatology, including risperidone (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.18, 95% CI = -0.92, -1.45, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis [CINeMA] = moderate confidence), olanzapine (SMD = -0.77, 95% CI = -0.36, -1.18, low confidence), aripiprazole (SMD = -0.67, 95% CI = -0.33, -1.01, moderate confidence), quetiapine (SMD = -0.60, 95% CI = -0.32, -0.87, high confidence), asenapine (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI = -0.19, -0.89, moderate confidence), and ziprasidone (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI = -0.17, 0.70, low confidence), whereas no mood stabilizer outperformed placebo. Concerning mania response, risperidone (Risk ratio [RR] = 2.58, 95% CI = 1.88, 3.54, low confidence), olanzapine (RR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.33, 3.54, very low confidence), aripiprazole (RR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.44, 2.92, low confidence), quetiapine (RR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.45n 2.47, moderate confidence), asenapine (RR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.28, 2.55, very low confidence) and lithium (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.83, p = .049, very low confidence) outperformed placebo, without superiority of other MSs vs placebo. Individually, risperidone was more efficacious in reducing manic symptomatology than all other comparators, except olanzapine and topiramate, yet with low/very low confidence, and was associated with increased prolactin and glucose. Pooled together, SGAs outperformed both placebo and MSs for mania symptom reduction (SMD = -0.68, 95% CI = -0.86, -0.51 and SMD = -0.61, 95% CI = -0.82, -0.40, moderate confidence), and mania response (RR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.53, 2.24 and RR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.33, 2.04, moderate confidence) without differences between MSs and placebo. There were no significant treatment-placebo differences for all-cause discontinuation, whereas lithium, ziprasidone, and oxcarbazepine were associated with more adverse event-related drop-outs than placebo. Most SGAs were associated with more sedation, weight gain, and metabolic issues vs placebo and MSs., Conclusion: SGAs were more efficacious than placebo and MSs in treating acute mania symptoms, however, their use must be carefully weighed against important side effects., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The 33-item Hypomania Checklist (HCL-33) has been shown to distinguish between adolescent bipolar disorder (BD) and unipolar depression. To investigate the utility of the HCL-33 as a screening tool in routine diagnostics, the frequency and psychopathological characteristics of detected individuals in a mixed psychiatric sample necessitate more examination., Methods: The HCL-33, Children's Depression Inventory, Beck's Anxiety Inventory, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire were completed by 285 children and adolescents (12-18 years) in a mixed psychiatric sample. Applying the proposed HCL-33 cut-off score of ≥ 18, individuals with depressive symptoms were divided into at-risk or not at-risk for BD groups. The factorial structure, sum and factor score correlations with psychopathology, and impact on daily functioning were assessed., Results: 20.6% of the sample met at-risk criteria for BD. These individuals (n = 55) were older, more anxious, and showed more conduct problems vs the not at-risk group (n = 107). A two- and a three-factor model were pursued with the same Factor 1 ("active-elated"). Factor 2 ("risk-taking/irritable") was separated into 2a ("irritable-erratic") and 2b ("outgoing-disinhibited") in the three-factor model. Whereas higher Factor 2 and 2a scores correlated with a broad range of more severe symptomatology (i.e., depression, anxiety, hyperactivity), higher Factor 1 and 2b scores correlated with more emotional and conduct problems, respectively. 51.7% of the sample reported a negative impact from hypomanic symptoms on daily functioning., Limitations: Cross-sectional design and data collection in a single mental health service., Conclusions: The HCL-33 may be a useful tool to improve diagnostics, especially in adolescents with depressive symptoms additionally presenting with anxious symptoms and conduct problems., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Extensive research has been undertaken to predict treatment response (TR) to antipsychotics. Most studies address TR to antipsychotics in general and as monotherapy, however, it is unknown whether patients might respond favourably to a combination of antipsychotics., Aims: This study aimed to identify differential predictors for TR to monotherapy with amisulpride or olanzapine compared to a combination of antipsychotics., Methods: Post-hoc analysis was conducted of data collected from the COMBINE-study, a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Demographic and disease-related measures were gathered at baseline to predict TR after eight weeks defined by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Missing values were accounted for by a random replacement procedure. Attrition effects and multicollinearity were analysed and sets of logistic regression models were calculated for different treatment groups., Results: Of the 321 randomized patients, 201 completed procedures until week eight and 197 were included in the analyses. For all treatment groups, early TR after two weeks and high subjective well-being under antipsychotics at baseline were robust predictors for TR. The propensity for early side effects also indicated a higher risk of later non-response. Specific parameter estimates were rather similar between treatment groups., Conclusion: Early TR, drug-related subjective well-being, and early side effect propensity evolved as predictors for later TR whether to monotherapy or combination strategy. Accordingly, due to a lack of differential predictors, early and close monitoring of targeted and unwanted effects is indicated to guide respective treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite a steady increase of antipsychotic prescriptions in children and adolescents, knowledge about pharmacokinetics and dosing of antipsychotics in children and adolescents remains limited., Areas Covered: We discuss seven issues with major impact on the pharmacokinetics of antipsychotics in youth: estrogens, ii) obesity, iii) ethnicity, iv) smoking, v) inflammation, vi) drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and vii) pharmacogenetics. Despite their major impact, these issues have not been adequately considered in the context of dosing algorithms for antipsychotics in youth. A simple tool to quantify the impact of these pharmacokinetics issues on antipsychotics is therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), which refers to the quantification of the prescribed medication in the blood of the patients, as a surrogate for the peripheral antipsychotic exposure. We also provide summary tables extrapolated from the adult literature on metabolism, therapeutic reference ranges (TRRs) and DDIs., Expert Opinion: Despite considerable experience with TDM for antipsychotics in the management of other patient subgroups, TDM use for antipsychotics in children and adolescents may be limited with TRRs invariably being extrapolated from adult patients. Advancing TDM knowledge is expected to help clinicians address the special properties of pharmacokinetics of antipsychotics and ultimately enable antipsychotic dose individualization in youth.

To provide an overview of treatments in the pipeline for adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), we searched https://clinicaltrials.gov/and and https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ from 01/01/2010-10/18/2023 for ongoing or completed phase 2 or 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), assessing pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions for adults with ADHD with no current regulatory approval. We found 90 eligible RCTs. Of these, 24 (27 %) reported results with statistical analysis for primary efficacy endpoints. While several pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions had evidence of superiority compared to the control condition from a single RCT, centanafadine (norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin re-uptake inhibitor) was the only treatment with evidence of efficacy on ADHD core symptoms (small effect size=0.28-0.40) replicated in at least one additional RCT, alongside reasonable tolerability. Overall, the body of ongoing RCTs in adults with ADHD is insufficient, without any intervention on the horizon to match the efficacy of stimulant treatment or atomoxetine and with better tolerability profile. Additional effective and well tolerated treatments for adults with ADHD require development and testing., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is frequent but evidence-based guidelines on reducing APP to antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) are sparse. We aimed to systematically review clinical interventions randomizing patients to reducing APP to APM versus continuing APP., Methods: Systematic literature review searching Medline and Embase (latest search January 10, 2024) for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) studying interventions comparing individuals randomized to reduction of APP to APM with individuals continuing on APP. Two independent reviewers performed the literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (RoB2). We performed random effects meta-analyses on the main outcome all-cause discontinuation/"acceptability" of the treatment strategy and secondary outcomes change in psychopathology, functional level, and side effects., Results: The search identified 4672 hits, whereof 8 trials (N = 1204, 6 patient-level RCTs and 2 cluster-RCTs) were included, primarily in patients with schizophrenia. All trials were associated with high risk of bias. Compared to APP continuation, reduction to APM was associated with no significant change in all-cause discontinuation (studies = 6, n = 455, RR = 1.48, 95%CI = 0.74-2.95, I 2  = 78 %) or inefficacy-related discontinuation (studies = 5, n = 351, RR = 1.60, 95%CI = 0.46-5.55, I 2  = 70 %). Patients randomized to APM showed a trend towards greater reduction in psychopathology (studies = 5, n = 244, SMD = -0.24, 95%CI = -0.49, 0.02, I 2  = 0 %) but no difference in functional level nor side effects. The cluster-RCTs found that interventions at the departmental level can result in lower rates of APP., Conclusion: Although switching patients from APP to APM can be a viable approach, too few RCTs exist on this important topic. Clinicians need to evaluate potential benefits and risks of APP and APM on an individual basis., Prospero Registration: CRD42022329955., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest OKF reports honoraria for lectures for Lundbeck Pharma A/S and consultant work for WCG Clinical. MH reports honoraria for lectures for Lundbeck Pharma A/S and Otsuka, and consultant work for Lundbeck Pharma A/S. C.R. received the 2020 Lundbeck Foundation Talent Prize. CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Car dio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: TV-46000 is a long-acting subcutaneous antipsychotic (LASCA) formulation of risperidone that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind RIsperidone Subcutaneous Extended-release (RISE) study, TV-46000 once monthly (q1m) and once every 2 months (q2m) significantly prolonged time to impending relapse compared with placebo [5.0-fold (q1m) and 2.7-fold (q2m)]. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind Safety in Humans of TV-46000 subcutaneous INjection Evaluation (SHINE) study was designed to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and exposure of TV-46000 in schizophrenia., Methods: Patients who completed RISE without relapse (rollover) or who were newly recruited (de novo) were eligible for the SHINE study. Patients were initially stabilized on oral risperidone for 12 weeks (completed in RISE for rollover, or in SHINE for de novo). Patients in the de novo cohort and patients who received placebo in RISE were randomized 1:1 in SHINE to receive TV-46000 q1m or q2m for up to 56 weeks. Primary endpoint for SHINE was frequency of reported adverse events (AEs); event rates [ER; events per 100 patient-years (PYs)] were calculated for each AE by patients upon general questioning., Results: Overall, 336 patients were randomized in SHINE [TV-46000 q1m, n = 174; TV-46000 q2m, n = 162; of these, de novo, n = 109 and rollover, n = 227 (n = 172 patients were treated and n = 55 received placebo)]. A total of 334 patients were evaluated for safety [q1m, n = 172 (PY = 97.8); q2m, n = 162 (PY = 104.5)]. Proportions of patients (ER) with ≥ 1 AE and ≥ 1 treatment-related AE were 37% (180.0) and 21% (84.9) for TV-46000 q1m and 46% (157.9) and 20% (70.8) for TV-46000 q2m, respectively. Frequent treatment-related AEs [≥ 3% of patients in either group; proportion of patients (ER)] were injection site pain [q1m, 5% (24.5); q2m, 4% (22.0)] and injection site nodule [q1m, 2% (9.2); q2m, 6% (12.4)]. The proportions of patients with serious AEs was 5% for TV-46000 q1m and 7% for TV-46000 q2m; serious AEs reported for ≥ 2 patients overall were worsening schizophrenia [q1m, n = 1 (< 1%; ER, 1.02); q2m, n = 2 (1%; ER, 1.91)] and hyperglycemia [q1m, n = 1 (< 1%; ER, 1.02); q2m, n = 1 (< 1%; ER, 0.96)]. Of three reported deaths, none were related to treatment. Overall, eight patients discontinued treatment because of AEs. Similar or somewhat lower rates of AEs were reported for patients who rolled over from TV-46000 treatment compared with those who had no prior TV-46000 treatment (de novo and placebo rollover). Most AEs related to injection site reactions were mild; no patient had a severe reaction., Conclusion: Results from this long-term safety study add to the favorable safety profiles of TV-46000 q1m and q2m, consistent with other formulations of risperidone and previous studies with TV-46000., Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03893825; 27 March 2019., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Little is known about rates of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among youth with bipolar spectrum disorders (BSD). As such, the aim of this study is to assess rates and predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among youth with BSD and their caregivers in the United States., Methods: Youth and their main caregiver were recruited from a large pragmatic study cohort. Youth who were aged 8-22 at the time of this data collection, had a bipolar-spectrum disorder diagnosis, had overweight or obesity, and were treated with a second-generation antipsychotic were invited to participate in an online survey and interview assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic., Results: A total of 453 surveys and 341 interviews were completed 07/2021-05/2022 by youth and their caregivers. Sixty-seven percent of caregivers and 63 % of youth reported receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine uptake rates among youth and caregivers were highly correlated. Predictors of vaccine uptake among youth were older age and living in the Northeast Region of the United States. Predictors of caregiver vaccine uptake were male sex, higher annual household income and not having to quarantine due to COVID-19., Limitations: The sample was small and not a full representation of a population with bipolar-spectrum disorders therefore, the results may not be generalizable. The study design and statistical method do not allow for causal inferences to be made., Conclusions: These findings may aid in targeting interventions to maximize COVID-19 and other vaccine uptake in youth with bipolar disorders and their families., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Author Disclosures: Dr. DelBello has received research support from Allergan, Alkermes, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Lundbeck, Myriad, NIMH, Otsuka, PCORI, Pfizer, Shire, and Sunovion. She has received consulting/advisory/board/honoraria support from Alkermes, CMEology, Johnson and Johnson, Medscape, Myriad, and Sage. Dr. Correll has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Car dio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen,Takeda and PCORI. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic. Dr. Patino has received research support from NIMH, PCORI, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Lundbeck, Myriad, Otsuka, Pfizer, Sunovion, and Shire. Drs. Klein, Welge, Fornari, and Higdon and Mr. Blom received salary support from PCORI. Ms. Keller and Ms. Wingler declare they have no financial interests. This study was funded by: PCORI Award Number: PCS-1406-19276., (Published by Elsevier B.V.)

To further explore the role of different antipsychotic treatments for cardio-cerebrovascular mortality, we performed several subgroup, sensitivity and meta-regression analyses based on a large previous meta-analysis focusing on cohort studies assessing mortality relative risk (RR) for cardio-cerebrovascular disorders in people with schizophrenia, comparing antipsychotic treatment versus no antipsychotic. Quality assessment through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and publication bias was measured. We meta-analyzed 53 different studies (schizophrenia patients: n = 2,513,359; controls: n = 360,504,484) to highlight the differential effects of antipsychotic treatment regimens on cardio-cerebrovascular-related mortality in incident and prevalent samples of patients with schizophrenia. We found first generation antipsychotics (FGA) to be associated with higher mortality in incident samples of schizophrenia (oral FGA [RR=2.20, 95 %CI=1.29-3.77, k = 1] and any FGA [RR=1.70, 95 %CI=1.20-2.41, k = 1]). Conversely, second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and clozapine were associated with reduced cardio-cerebrovascular-related mortality, in prevalent samples of schizophrenia. Subgroup analyses with NOS score ≥7 (higher quality) demonstrated a significantly increased cardio-cerebrovascular disorder-related mortality, among those exposed to FGAs vs SGAs. Meta-regression analyses demonstrated a larger association between antipsychotics and decreased risk of mortality with longer follow-up, recent study year, and higher number of adjustment variables. Overall, this subanalysis of a systematic review contributes to the evolving understanding of the complex role of antipsychotic treatment for cardio-cerebrovascular mortality in schizophrenia, paving the way for more targeted interventions and improved patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest MS received honoraria/has been a consultant for AbbVie, Angelini, Lundbeck, Otsuka. IB received consulting fees from Gedeon Richter and Janssen/Janssen-Cilag; speaker's honoraria from Gedeon Richter, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Janssen/Janssen-Cilag, KRKA, Lundbeck and Medichem Pharmaceuticals Inc. by Unilab; received research grant from Gedeon Richter; royalties from Oxford University Press. JT has participated in research projects funded by grants from Janssen-Cilag to his employing institution; he has been a consultant to HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Orion, Teva, and WebMed Global and received lecture fees from Janssen, Lundbeck and Otsuka. PG received during the last 5 years fees for presentations at congresses or participation in scientific boards from Biogen, Janssen, Lundbeck, Merk, Otsuka, Richter and Viatris. R.E.N. has, within the past 3 years, been an investigator for Compass Pharmaceuticals, Janssen-Cilag, Sage and Boehringer-Ingelheim for clinical trials; has received speaking fees from Lundbeck, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Janssen-Cilag and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals; and has acted as advisor to Lundbeck and Janssen-Cilag. JF is supported by a UK Research and Innovation Future Leaders Fellowship (MR/T021780/1) and has received honoraria / consultancy fees from Atheneum, Informa, Gillian Kenny Associates, Bayer, Big Health, Hedonia, Strive Coaching, Wood For Trees, Nutritional Medicine Institute, Angelini, ParachuteBH, Richmond Foundation and Nirakara, independent of this work. RIGH has received fees for lecturing from EASD, Eli Lilly, Encore, Liberum, Novo Nordisk, ROVI and funding for conference attendance from Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. HT has participated in research projects funded by grants from Janssen-Cilag to her employing institution; and she has received lecture fees from Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Lundbeck and Otsuka. MF received honoraria for his speaker activity from the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology (ASCP) and served as a consultant for Angelini, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Sanofi-Aventis, and Boehringer Ingelheim. BS is on the Editorial Board of Ageing Research Reviews, Mental Health and Physical Activity, The Journal of Evidence Based Medicine, and The Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry. Brendon has received honorarium from a co-edited book on exercise and mental illness (Elsevier), and unrelated advisory work from ASICS, in addition to honorarium and stock options at FitXR LTD. HL reports receiving grants from Shire Pharmaceuticals; personal fees from and serving as a speaker for Medice, Shire/Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Evolan Pharma AB; all outside the submitted work. Henrik Larsson is editor-in-chief of JCPP Advances. CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Maplight, Mylan, Neumora Therapeutics, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, Viatris and Xenon Pharmaceuticals. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic. PL reports institutional grants from AstraZeneca, Biogen, Jansen, MSD and Novartis. EV has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: AB-Biotics, AbbVie, Adamed, Angelini, Biogen, Beckley-Psytech, Biohaven, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celon Pharma, Compass, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Ethypharm, Ferrer, Gedeon Richter, GH Research, Glaxo-Smith Kline, HMNC, Idorsia, Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Luye Pharma, Medincell, Merck, Newron, Novartis, Orion Corporation, Organon, Otsuka, Roche, Rovi, Sage, Sanofi-Aventis, Sunovion, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Lacking biomarkers in psychiatry calls for a valid and reliable assessment of psychopathology across mental disorders that is easy to use, bridges research and clinical care, and that can capture clinician and patient perspectives. Herein we propose, a novel, brief, transdiagnostic tool to assess and visualize symptom severity in different psychiatric disorders. The Transdiagnostic Global Impression - Psychopathology scale (TGI-P) is based on the Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S), which was originally designed to measure global illness severity in one score. The TGI-P covers 10 transdiagnostic symptom domains and similar to the CGI-S, it is rated on a 7-point Likert-scale from 1 (normal) to 7 (extreme). These ten domains include positive symptoms, negative symptoms, manic symptoms, depressive symptoms, addiction symptoms, cognitive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, sleep symptoms, hostility symptoms, and self-harm symptoms. The results are visually presented, thus simplifying the monitoring of symptoms, and facilitating discussion with patients and caregivers. As part of the development process, the TGI-P was surveyed among 36 psychiatrists from 3 countries. Importantly, over 80 % of them was "very positive" or "positive" about the concept of the tool, and most of them (70 %) reported willingness to use it in their everyday practice. Further psychometric development and testing of the TGI-P is underway alongside future TGI scales covering adverse events, functioning and satisfaction., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Zs.B.D., Á.B., Gy.N., and T.B. are employees of Gedeon Richter Plc. C.U.C has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Maplight, Mylan, Neumora Therapeutics, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Saladax, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, Viatris and Xenon Pharmaceuticals. He provided expert testimony for Janssen, Lundbeck and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Medlink, Mindpax, and Quantic. R.S.M. has received research grant support from CIHR/GACD/National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)and the Milken Institute; speaker/consultation fees from Lundbeck, Janssen, Alkermes, Neumora Therapeutics,Boehringer Ingelheim, Sage, Biogen, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Purdue, Pfizer, Otsuka, Takeda, Neurocrine, Neurawell,Sunovion, Bausch Health, Axsome, Novo Nordisk, Kris, Sanofi, Eisai, Intra-Cellular, NewBridge Pharmaceuticals,Viatris, AbbVie, and Atai Life Sciences. Dr. S. Roger McIntyre is a CEO of Braxia Scientific Corp., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Medication is commonly used in anorexia nervosa (AN) despite largely missing high grade evidence. Olanzapine (OLZ) is the best-evidenced substance used off-label in this group, with conflicting outcome regarding BMI, clinical and safety parameters. Therefore, it is important to strictly assure quality of treatment with OLZ in AN by using 'Therapeutic Drug Monitoring' according to AGNP-guidelines, including serum levels and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to support safety for adolescents with AN and attempt to generate an initial age- and disorder-specific therapeutic reference range., Method: Sixty-five adolescents with AN (aged 10-18) treated with OLZ (98% female; 97.5% AN-restricting-type) were prospectively observed, ADRs reported, and correlations between dosage and serum levels measured at trough level were calculated, a preliminary therapeutic range defined., Results: Mean dosage of OLZ was 8.15 (SD: 2.91) mg and 0.19 (SD: 0.07) mg/kg respectively, average concentration was 26.57 (SD: 13.46) ng/mL. Correlation between daily dosage/dosage per kg and serum level was 0.72 (**p < 0.001)/0.65 (**p < 0.001), respectively. ADRs with impairment were rare (6.3%). 75% improved clinically (CGI). BMI increased significantly by 1.5 kg/m 2 (t = 10.6, p < 0.001). A preliminary therapeutic reference range is 11.9 and 39.9 ng/mL., Conclusions: OLZ in the hands of specialists is a well-tolerated and safe treatment adjunct for adolescents with AN., (© 2023 The Authors. European Eating Disorders Review published by Eating Disorders Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The role of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) as an early detection and intervention target to improve outcomes for individuals with first-episode psychosis is unknown., Study Design: PRISMA/MOOSE-compliant systematic review to identify studies until February 1, 2023, with an intervention and a control group, reporting DUP in both groups. Random effects meta-analysis to evaluate (1) differences in DUP in early detection/intervention services vs the control group, (2) the efficacy of early detection strategies regarding eight real-world outcomes at baseline (service entry), and (3) the efficacy of early intervention strategies on ten real-world outcomes at follow-up. We conducted quality assessment, heterogeneity, publication bias, and meta-regression analyses (PROSPERO: CRD42020163640)., Study Results: From 6229 citations, 33 intervention studies were retrieved. The intervention group achieved a small DUP reduction (Hedges' g = 0.168, 95% CI = 0.055-0.283) vs the control group. The early detection group had better functioning levels (g = 0.281, 95% CI = 0.073-0.488) at baseline. Both groups did not differ regarding total psychopathology, admission rates, quality of life, positive/negative/depressive symptoms, and employment rates (P > .05). Early interventions improved quality of life (g = 0.600, 95% CI = 0.408-0.791), employment rates (g = 0.427, 95% CI = 0.135-0.718), negative symptoms (g = 0.417, 95% CI = 0.153-0.682), relapse rates (g = 0.364, 95% CI = 0.117-0.612), admissions rates (g = 0.335, 95% CI = 0.198-0.468), total psychopathology (g = 0.298, 95% CI = 0.014-0.582), depressive symptoms (g = 0.268, 95% CI = 0.008-0.528), and functioning (g = 0.180, 95% CI = 0.065-0.295) at follow-up but not positive symptoms or remission (P > .05)., Conclusions: Comparing interventions targeting DUP and control groups, the impact of early detection strategies on DUP and other correlates is limited. However, the impact of early intervention was significant regarding relevant outcomes, underscoring the importance of supporting early intervention services worldwide., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.)

Schizophrenia is a frequently debilitating and complex mental disorder affecting approximately 1% of the global population, characterized by symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thoughts and behaviors, cognitive dysfunction, and negative symptoms. Traditional treatment has centered on postsynaptic dopamine antagonists, commonly known as antipsychotic drugs, which aim to alleviate symptoms and improve functioning and the quality of life. Despite the availability of these medications, significant challenges remain in schizophrenia therapeutics, including incomplete symptom relief, treatment resistance, and medication side effects. This opinion article explores advancements in schizophrenia treatment, emphasizing molecular mechanisms, novel drug targets, and innovative delivery methods. One promising approach is novel strategies that target neural networks and circuits rather than single neurotransmitters, acknowledging the complexity of brain region interconnections involved in schizophrenia. Another promising approach is the development of biased agonists, which selectively activate specific signaling pathways downstream of receptors, offering potential for more precise pharmacological interventions with fewer side effects. The concept of molecular polypharmacy, where a single drug targets multiple molecular pathways, is exemplified by KarXT, a novel drug combining xanomeline and trospium to address both psychosis and cognitive dysfunction. This approach represents a comprehensive strategy for schizophrenia treatment, potentially improving outcomes for patients. In conclusion, advancing the molecular understanding of schizophrenia and exploring innovative therapeutic strategies hold promise for addressing the unmet needs in schizophrenia treatment, aiming for more effective and tailored interventions. Future research should focus on these novel approaches to achieve better clinical outcomes and improve the functional level and quality of life for individuals with schizophrenia.

The COVID-19 pandemic appears to have had a considerable impact on the mental health of children and adolescents, particularly regarding eating disorders. However, it remains unclear whether the pandemic affected only the frequency or also the severity of eating disorders. We examined potential pandemic-related changes in the administrative prevalence of eating disorders in the outpatient sector compared with other mental disorders using German statutory health insurance data for the age group 10 to 16 years. We also examined disorder severity of anorexia nervosa using data from the multicenter German Registry of Children and Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa in the same age group. Our results showed a marked increase in the administrative prevalence of eating disorders (based on documented diagnoses) in the outpatient sector among girls but not among boys. A similar pattern was found for internalizing disorders, whereas the administrative prevalences of externalizing disorders decreased. Regarding the severity of anorexia nervosa among inpatients, we found no pandemic-related changes in body mass index standard deviation score at admission, body weight loss before admission, psychiatric comorbidities and psychopharmacological medication. Given the administrative prevalence increase in the outpatient sector, the lack of impact of the pandemic on the inpatient sector may also be partly due to a shift in healthcare utilization towards outpatient services during the pandemic. Thus, the higher number of children and adolescents requiring specialized and timely outpatient care may be a major concern under pandemic conditions., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Sub-optimal response in schizophrenia is frequent, warranting augmentation strategies over treatment-as-usual (TAU). We assessed nutraceuticals/phytoceutical augmentation strategies via network meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder were identified via the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Change (Standardized Mean Difference = SMD) in total symptomatology and acceptability (Risk Ratio = RR) were co-primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were positive, negative, cognitive, and depressive symptom changes, general psychopathology, tolerability, and response rates. We conducted subset analyses by disease phase and sensitivity analyses by risk of bias and assessed global/local inconsistency, publication bias, risk of bias, and confidence in the evidence. The systematic review included 49 records documenting 50 studies (n = 2384) documenting 22 interventions. Citicoline (SMD =-1.05,95%CI = -1.85; -0.24), L-lysine (SMD = -1.04,95%CI = -1.84; -0.25), N-acetylcysteine (SMD = -0.87, 95%CI = -1.27; -0.47) and sarcosine (SMD = -0.5,95%CI = -0.87-0.13) outperformed placebo for total symptomatology. High heterogeneity (tau 2  = 0.10, I 2  = 55.9%) and global inconsistency (Q = 40.79, df = 18, p = 0.002) emerged without publication bias (Egger's test, p = 0.42). Sarcosine improved negative symptoms (SMD = -0.65, 95%CI = -1.10; -0.19). N-acetylcysteine improved negative symptoms (SMD = -0.90, 95%CI = -1.42; -0.39)/general psychopathology (SMD = -0.76, 95%CI = -1.39; -0.13). No compound improved total symptomatology within acute phase studies (k = 7, n = 422). Sarcosine (SMD = -1.26,95%CI = -1.91; -0.60), citicoline (SMD = -1.05,95%CI = -1.65;-0.44), and N-acetylcysteine (SMD = -0.55,95%CI = -0.92,-0.19) outperformed placebo augmentation in clinically stable participants. Sensitivity analyses removing high-risk-of-bias studies confirmed overall findings in all phases and clinically stable samples. In contrast, the acute phase analysis restricted to low risk-of-bias studies showed a superior effect vs. placebo for N-acetylcysteine (SMD = -1.10, 95%CI = -1.75,-0.45), L-lysine (SMD = -1.05,95%CI = -1.55, -0.19), omega-3 fatty acids (SMD = -0.83,95%CI = -1.31, -0.34) and withania somnifera (SMD = -0.71,95%CI = -1.21,-0.22). Citicoline (SMD = -1.05,95%CI = -1.86,-0.23), L-lysine (SMD = -1.04,95%CI = -1.84,-0.24), N-acetylcysteine (SMD = -0.89,95%CI = -1.35,-0.43) and sarcosine (SMD = -0.61,95%CI = -1.02,-0.21) outperformed placebo augmentation of TAU ("any phase"). Drop-out due to any cause or adverse events did not differ between nutraceutical/phytoceutical vs. placebo+TAU. Sarcosine, citicoline, and N-acetylcysteine are promising augmentation interventions in stable patients with schizophrenia, yet the quality of evidence is low to very low. Further high-quality trials in acute phases/specific outcomes/difficult-to-treat schizophrenia are warranted., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Objectives: This survey assessed psychiatry residents'/early-career psychiatrists' attitudes towards the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antipsychotics., Methods: A previously developed questionnaire on attitudes on TDM utility during antipsychotic treatment was cross-sectionally disseminated by national coordinators between 01/01/2022-31/12/2023. The frequency of using TDM for antipsychotics other than clozapine was the main outcome in a linear regression analysis, including sex, clinical setting, caseload, and factors generated by an exploratory factor analysis. Comparisons between residents and early-career psychiatrists, respondents working in in- and outpatient settings, and low-/middle- and high-income countries were performed., Results: Altogether, 1,237 respondents completed the survey, with 37.9% having never used TDM for antipsychotics. Seven factors explained 41% of response variance; six of them were associated with frequency of TDM use ( p  < 0.05). Items with highest loadings for factors included clinical benefits of TDM (factors A and E: 0.7), negative expectations for beliefs of patients towards TDM (factor B: 0.6-0.7), weak TDM scientific evidence (factor C: 0.8), and TDM availability (factor D: -0.8). Respondents from low-/middle-income countries were less likely to frequently/almost always use TDM compared to high-income countries (9.4% vs. 21.5%, p  < 0.001)., Discussion: TDM use for antipsychotics was poor and associated with limited knowledge and insufficient availability.

Background: The degree of physiological responses to individual antipsychotic drugs is unclear in children and adolescents. With network meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the effects of various antipsychotic medications on physiological variables in children and adolescents with neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions., Methods: For this network meta-analysis, we searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus from database inception until Dec 22, 2023, and included randomised controlled trials comparing antipsychotics with placebo in children or adolescents younger than 18 years with any neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental condition. Primary outcomes were mean change from baseline to end of acute treatment in bodyweight, BMI, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, prolactin, heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) for patients receiving either active treatment or placebo. For multigroup trials reporting several doses, we calculated a summary value for each physiological variable for all doses. After transitivity assessment, we fitted frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses for all comparisons in the network. A Kilim plot was used to summarise the results for all treatments and outcomes, providing information regarding the strength of the statistical evidence of treatment effects, using p values. Network heterogeneity was assessed with τ, risk of bias of individual trials was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias, and the credibility of findings from each network meta-analysis was assessed with the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINEMA) app. This study is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021274393)., Findings: Of 6676 studies screened, 47 randomised controlled trials were included, which included 6500 children (mean age 13·29 years, SD 2·14) who received treatment for a median of 7 weeks (IQR 6-8) with either placebo (n=2134) or one of aripiprazole, asenapine, blonanserin, clozapine, haloperidol, lurasidone, molindone, olanzapine, paliperidone, pimozide, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone (n=4366). Mean differences for bodyweight change gain compared with placebo ranged from -2·00 kg (95% CI -3·61 to -0·39) with molindone to 5·60 kg (0·27 to 10·94) with haloperidol; BMI -0·70 kg/m 2 (-1·21 to -0·19) with molindone to 2·03 kg/m 2 (0·51 to 3·55) with quetiapine; total cholesterol -0·04 mmol/L (-0·39 to 0·31) with blonanserin to 0·35 mmol/L (0·17 to 0·53) with quetiapine; LDL cholesterol -0·12 mmol/L (-0·31 to 0·07) with risperidone or paliperidone to 0·17 mmol/L (-0·06 to 0·40) with olanzapine; HDL cholesterol 0·05 mmol/L (-0·19 to 0·30) with quetiapine to 0·48 mmol/L (0·18 to 0·78) with risperidone or paliperidone; triglycerides -0·03 mmol/L (-0·12 to 0·06) with lurasidone to 0·29 mmol/L (0·14 to 0·44) with olanzapine; fasting glucose from -0·09 mmol/L (-1·45 to 1·28) with blonanserin to 0·74 mmol/L (0·04 to 1·43) with quetiapine; prolactin from -2·83 ng/mL (-8·42 to 2·75) with aripiprazole to 26·40 ng/mL (21·13 to 31·67) with risperidone or paliperidone; heart rate from -0·20 bpm (-8·11 to 7·71) with ziprasidone to 12·42 bpm (3·83 to 21·01) with quetiapine; SBP from -3·40 mm Hg (-6·25 to -0·55) with ziprasidone to 10·04 mm Hg (5·56 to 14·51) with quetiapine; QTc from -0·61 ms (-1·47 to 0·26) with pimozide to 0·30 ms (-0·05 to 0·65) with ziprasidone., Interpretation: Children and adolescents show varied but clinically significant physiological responses to individual antipsychotic drugs. Treatment guidelines for children and adolescents with a range of neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions should be updated to reflect each antipsychotic drug's distinct profile for associated metabolic changes, alterations in prolactin, and haemodynamic alterations., Funding: UK Academy of Medical Sciences, Brain and Behaviour Research Foundation, UK National Institute of Health Research, Maudsley Charity, the Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, National Institute of Health and Care Research Biomedical Centre at King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, the Italian Ministry of University and Research, the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan, and Swiss National Science Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RAM has participated in speaker meetings for Otsuka, Karuna, and Janssen and in advisory boards for Viatris, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Karuna. ED’A has received lecture fees from Lundbeck. GS-d-P has participated in advisory and speaker meetings for Jansen and Menarini. OE has received honoraria and consulting fees from Biogen, paid to his institution. AC has received research, educational, and consultancy fees from the Italian Network for Paediatric Trials, the Cariplo Foundation, Lundbeck, and Angelini Pharma and is the chief investigator of a randomised controlled trial of seltorexant for adolescents with depression that is sponsored by Janssen. CUC has received consultancy fees as an advisor from Alkermes, Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Gedeon Richter, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante–ProPhase, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Rovi, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sunovion, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris; has received speaker fees from AbbVie, Alkermes, Angelini, Aristo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerevel, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Karuna, Lundbeck, Mylan, Otsuka, Recordati, Rovi, Seqirus, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris; has received honoraria from Allergan, Biogen, Relmada, Reviva, and Supernus; has provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka; was on a data safety monitoring board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Supernus, Tolmar, and Teva; has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda; has received royalties from UpToDate; and is a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, LB Pharma, PsiloSterics, and Quantic. ODH has received investigator-initiated research funding from and participated in advisory and speaker meetings for Angellini, Autifony, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Heptares, Global Medical Education, Invicro, Janssen, Lundbeck, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Sunovion, Rand, Recordati, Roche, ROVI Biotech, Viatris, and Mylan. TP has participated in educational speaker meetings for Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sunovion, Janssen, Schwabe Pharma, ROVI Biotech, and Recordati and receives book royalties from Wiley Blackwell. TP and RAM co-direct Pharmatik, which designs digital resources to support treatment of mental illness. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have the potential to improve adherence and symptom control in patients with schizophrenia, promoting long-term recovery. Paliperidone palmitate (PP) once every 6 months is the first and currently only LAI antipsychotic with an extended dosing interval of 6 months., Objective: To assess long-term outcomes of PP received once every 6 months in adults with schizophrenia., Design, Setting, and Participants: In a 2-year open-label extension (OLE) study of a 1-year randomized clinical trial (RCT), eligible adults with schizophrenia could choose to continue PP every 6 months if they had not experienced relapse after receiving PP once every 3 or 6 months in the 1-year, international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized noninferiority trial. The present analysis focused on patients receiving PP every 6 months in the double-blind trial through the OLE study (November 20, 2017, to May 3, 2022)., Intervention: Patients received a dorsogluteal injection of PP on day 1 and once every 6 months up to month 30., Main Outcomes and Measures: End points included assessment of relapse and change from the double-blind trial baseline to the OLE end point in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Scale, and Personal Social Performance (PSP) Scale scores. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), injection site evaluations, and laboratory tests were also assessed., Results: Among 121 patients (83 [68.6%] male), mean (SD) age at baseline was 38.6 (11.24) years and mean (SD) duration of illness was 11.0 (9.45) years. At screening of the double-blind study, 101 patients (83.5%) were taking an oral antipsychotic and 20 (16.5%) were taking an LAI antipsychotic. Altogether, 5 of 121 patients (4.1%) experienced relapse during the 3-year follow-up; reasons for relapse were psychiatric hospitalization (2 [1.7%]), suicidal or homicidal ideation (2 [1.7%]), and deliberate self-injury (1 [0.8%]). Patients treated with PP every 6 months were clinically and functionally stable, and outcomes were well maintained, evidenced by stable scores on the PANSS (mean [SD] change, -2.6 [9.96] points), CGI-S (mean [SD] change, -0.2 [0.57] points), and PSP (mean [SD] change, 3.1 [9.14] points) scales over the 3-year period. In total, 101 patients (83.5%) completed the 2-year OLE. At least 1 TEAE was reported in 97 of 121 patients (80.2%) overall; no new safety or tolerability concerns were identified., Conclusions and Relevance: In a 2-year OLE study of a 1-year RCT, results supported favorable long-term outcomes of PP once every 6 months for up to 3 years in adults with schizophrenia.

Objective: Early-onset psychosis (EOP) refers to the development of psychosis before the age of 18 years. We aimed to summarize, for the first time, the meta-analytical evidence in the field of this vulnerable population and to provide evidence-based recommendations., Method: We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant, pre-registered (PROSPERO: CRD42022350868) systematic review of several databases and registers to identify meta-analyses of studies conducted in EOP individuals to conduct an umbrella review. Literature search, screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were carried out independently. Results were narratively reported, clustered across core domains. Quality assessment was performed with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) tool., Results: A total of 30 meta-analyses were included (373 individual studies, 25,983 participants, mean age 15.1 years, 38.3% female). Individuals with EOP showed more cognitive impairments compared with controls and individuals with adult/late-onset psychosis. Abnormalities were observed meta-analytically in neuroimaging markers but not in oxidative stress and inflammatory response markers. In all, 60.1% of EOP individuals had a poor prognosis. Clozapine was the antipsychotic with the highest efficacy for overall, positive, and negative symptoms. Tolerance to medication varied among the evaluated antipsychotics. The risk of discontinuation of antipsychotics for any reason or side effects was low or equal compared to placebo., Conclusion: EOP is associated with cognitive impairment, involuntary admissions, and poor prognosis. Antipsychotics can be efficacious in EOP, but tolerability and safety need to be taken into consideration. Clozapine should be considered in EOP individuals who are resistant to 2 non-clozapine antipsychotics. Further meta-analytical research is needed on response to psychological interventions and other prognostic factors., Plain Language Summary: This umbrella review summarized the meta-analytical knowledge from 30 meta-analyses on early-onset psychosis. Early-onset psychosis refers to the development of psychosis before the age of 18 years and is associated with cognitive impairment, hospitalization, and poor prognosis. Individuals with early-onset psychosis show more cognitive impairments and abnormalities compared with controls. Clozapine was the antipsychotic with the highest efficacy for positive, negative, and overall symptoms and should be considered in individuals with early-onset psychosis., Study Preregistration Information: Early Onset Psychosis: Umbrella Review on Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment factors; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; CRD42022350868., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Clozapine is the only approved antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Although a large body of evidence supports its efficacy and favorable risk-benefit ratio in individuals who have failed two or more antipsychotics, clozapine remains underused. However, variations in clozapine utilization across geographic and clinical settings suggest that it could be possible to improve its use. In this narrative review and expert opinion, we summarized information available in the literature on the mechanisms of action, effectiveness, and potential adverse events of clozapine. We identified barriers leading to discouragement in clozapine prescription internationally, and we proposed practical solutions to overcome each barrier. One of the main obstacles identified to the use of clozapine is the lack of appropriate training for physicians: we highlighted the need to develop specific professional programs to train clinicians, both practicing and in residency, on the relevance and efficacy of clozapine in TRS treatment, initiation, maintenance, and management of potential adverse events. This approach would facilitate physicians to identify eligible patients and offer clozapine as a treatment option in the early stage of the disease. We also noted that increasing awareness of the benefits of clozapine among healthcare professionals, people with TRS, and their caregivers can help promote the use of clozapine. Educational material, such as leaflets or videos, could be developed and distributed to achieve this goal. The information provided in this article may be useful to improve disease burden and support healthcare professionals, patients, and caregivers navigating the complex pathways to TRS management., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest BCF declares that has received speaking honoraria (advisory board and educational lectures) and travel expenses from Rovi, Takeda, Menarini, Angelini, Teva, Otsuka, Lundbeck, Boehringer-Ingelheim and Johnson and Johnson. BC-F has also received fundings to support independent research initiatives (i.e., investigator initiated trials) from Lundbeck and also declares that has received funds from Viatris to conduct this study. CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Adock Ingram, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Car dio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic. ODH has received investigator-initiated research funding from and/or participated in advisory/ speaker meetings organised by Angellini, Autifony, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Elysium, Heptares, Global Medical Education, Invicro, Jansenn, Karuna, Lundbeck, Merck, Neurocrine, Ontrack/ Pangea, Otsuka, Sunovion, Recordati, Roche, Rovi and Viatris/ Mylan. He was previously a part-time employee of Lundbeck A/v. Dr Howes has a patent for the use of dopaminergic imaging. NS is a part time medical consultant for Viatris, Finland. He is also a Medical Advisor for Janssen-Cilag, Finland and Recordati, Sweden, and received lecture fees from Viatris, Finland; Otsuka, Finland. ADB has received unrestricted research support from Janssen, Lundbeck, and Otsuka and lecture honoraria for unrestricted educational meeting from Janssen, Chiesi, Lundbeck, Roche, Sunovion, Mylan, Viatris, Recordati, Angelini and Takeda; he has served on advisory boards for Eli Lilly, Jansen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Roche, and Takeda, Chiesi, Recordati, Angelini, Viatris, Iqvia, Idorsia. OA acts as advisor and consultant for Janssen-Ortho (Johnson & Johnson); Otsuka; Lundbeck; Allergan/Abbvie; Mylan/Viatris; Teva; he is involved in speaking engagements for Janssen-Ortho (Johnson & Johnson); Lundbeck, Otsuka, Mylan/Viatris; HLS Therapeutics; Allergan/Abbvie; he holds research contracts with Janssen-Ortho (Johnson & Johnson); Lundbeck; Otsuka; Boehringer Ingelheim. AF is a consultant and/or speaker and/or has received research grants from Angelini, Apsen, Biogen, Boheringer Ingelheim, Idorsia Italfarmaco, Lundbeck, Janssen, Medicamenta, Mylan, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Sunovion, Viatris., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose/background: Using data from KINECT® 4, a phase 3, 48-week study of valbenazine, post hoc analyses were conducted to assess long-term outcomes that are relevant to the real-world management of tardive dyskinesia (TD)., Methods/procedures: Post hoc analyses of the participants of the KINECT 4 study who completed 48 weeks of open-label valbenazine (40 or 80 mg) treatment were conducted. Valbenazine effects on TD were evaluated using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Clinical Global Impression of Change-TD (CGI-TD), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)., Findings/results: Of 103 participants completing 48 weeks of treatment, 55% experienced clinically meaningful improvement (defined as ≥2-point reduction in AIMS total score [sum of items 1 - 7, evaluated by site raters]) by week 4; at week 48, 97% met this threshold. The percentage of completers who achieved AIMS total score response thresholds of ≥10% to ≥90% increased over time, with 86% of completers reaching ≥50% improvement. Of the 40 (39%) completers with AIMS ≥50% response at week 8, 38 (95%) sustained this response at week 48; 81% of those who did not meet this threshold at week 8 had achieved it by week 48. At week 48, more than 85% of completers achieved CGI-TD and PGIC ratings of "much improved" or "very much improved.", Implications/conclusions: The majority of participants who completed 48 weeks of treatment with once-daily valbenazine experienced substantial clinically meaningful and sustained TD improvements. These findings indicate that valbenazine can be a highly effective long-term treatment in patients with TD., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background and Objective: Antipsychotics are core treatments for people living with psychotic disorders. Understanding individualised factors that influence both efficacy and adverse responses will improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine sex differences in antipsychotic-related efficacy and tolerability., Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from phase 1 and 1a of Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE); participants with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to double-blinded treatment with oral olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone or perphenazine. Measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale and Calgary Depression Rating Scale, as well as self-reported side effects, medication compliance, dosage, weight measurements and various blood parameters., Results: There were 1460 participants including 380 female and 1080 male individuals. Very few differences existed between male and female participants in response, adverse reactions, compliance or antipsychotic dosage. However, significantly more female participants than male participants reported constipation (28% vs 16%), dry mouth (50% vs 38%), gynecomastia/galactorrhea (11% vs 3%), incontinence/nocturia (16% vs 8%) and self reported weight gain (37% vs 24%) [all p < 0.001]. Within the risperidone treatment group, there was a significantly greater increase in prolactin levels (p < 0.001) among female participants (n = 61) than male participants (n = 159). No overall differences in clinician-rated measures, weight gain or other laboratory indicators were found., Conclusions: While overall sex differences were limited across efficacy and tolerability for antipsychotic treatment, there were some specific findings with risperidone. Further examination of sex differences within antipsychotic trials will be important to improve efficacy and reduce adverse responses across as well as individualising care for people with schizophrenia., (© 2024. Crown.)

There is a growing literature exploring the placebo response within specific mental disorders, but no overarching quantitative synthesis of this research has analyzed evidence across mental disorders. We carried out an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biological treatments (pharmacotherapy or neurostimulation) for mental disorders. We explored whether placebo effect size differs across distinct disorders, and the correlates of increased placebo effects. Based on a pre-registered protocol, we searched Medline, PsycInfo, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge up to 23.10.2022 for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses reporting placebo effect sizes in psychopharmacological or neurostimulation RCTs. Twenty meta-analyses, summarising 1,691 RCTs involving 261,730 patients, were included. Placebo effect size varied, and was large in alcohol use disorder (g = 0.90, 95% CI [0.70, 1.09]), depression (g = 1.10, 95% CI [1.06, 1.15]), restless legs syndrome (g = 1.41, 95% CI [1.25, 1.56]), and generalized anxiety disorder (d = 1.85, 95% CI [1.61, 2.09]). Placebo effect size was small-to-medium in obsessive-compulsive disorder (d = 0.32, 95% CI [0.22, 0.41]), primary insomnia (g = 0.35, 95% CI [0.28, 0.42]), and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (standardized mean change = 0.33, 95% CI [0.22, 0.44]). Correlates of larger placebo response in multiple mental disorders included later publication year (opposite finding for ADHD), younger age, more trial sites, larger sample size, increased baseline severity, and larger active treatment effect size. Most (18 of 20) meta-analyses were judged 'low' quality as per AMSTAR-2. Placebo effect sizes varied substantially across mental disorders. Future research should explore the sources of this variation. We identified important gaps in the literature, with no eligible systematic reviews/meta-analyses of placebo response in stress-related disorders, eating disorders, behavioural addictions, or bipolar mania., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Schizophrenia is most times a chronic and often debilitating illness associated with poor mental health outcomes. Early and effective treatment of schizophrenia in the most appropriate setting can make a significant difference in the long-term recovery. The aim of this narrative review was to provide suggestions and recommendations for effectively managing patients with schizophrenia during acute exacerbations and to enhance awareness and skills related to personalized medicine., Methods: A panel of academics and clinicians with experience in the field of psychosis met virtually on July 13 th 2023 to narratively review and discuss the research evidence and their clinical experience about the most appropriate acute treatments for patients with schizophrenia. This manuscript represents a synthesis of the panel analysis and discussion., Results: First contact is very important for service users, as is finding the most adequate treatment setting. If patients present to the emergency department, which may be a traumatic setting for service users, a dedicated environment with adequate space and specialized mental health support, including personnel trained in de-escalation techniques, is recommended. A well-connected continuum of care is strongly recommended, possibly with seamless links between inpatient units, day hospital services, outpatient facilities and rehabilitation services. Ideally, this should be structured as part of a coordinated step-down service line. Treatment challenges include suboptimal response, side effects, and nonadherence, which is reduced by the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics., Conclusion: Individual circumstances, including age, gender, and presence of hostility/aggression or self-harm, cognitive impairment and negative symptoms, comorbidities (depression, substance use disorders) or associated symptoms (anxiety, insomnia), should be considered when selecting the most appropriate treatment for the acute phase of schizophrenia. Efficacy and feasibility, as well as acceptability and tolerability of treatments, require joint consideration from the early stages of schizophrenia, thereby enhancing the possibility of improved short- and long-term outcomes., Competing Interests: Prof Correll has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, LB Pharma and Quantic. Prof Arango has been a consultant to or has received honoraria or grants from Abbott, Acadia, Angelini, Boehringer, Gedeon Richter, Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck, Minerva, Otsuka, Pfizer, Roche, Sage, Servier, Shire, Schering Plough, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Sunovion and Takeda. Prof Arango has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), co-financed by the European Union, ERDF Funds from the European Commission, “A way of making Europe”, financed by the European Union – NextGenerationEU (PMP21/00051), PI19/01024.  CIBERSAM, Madrid Regional Government (B2017/BMD-3740 AGES-CM-2), European Union Structural Funds, European Union Seventh Framework Program, European Union H2020 Program under the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking: Project PRISM-2 (Grant agreement No.101034377), Project AIMS-2-TRIALS (Grant agreement No 777394), Horizon Europe, the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number 1U01MH124639-01 (Project ProNET) and Award Number 5P50MH115846-03 (project FEP-CAUSAL), Fundación Familia Alonso, and Fundación Alicia Koplowitz. Professor Andrea Fagiolini reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support, from Angelini, Boehringer Ingelheim, Idorsia, Lundbeck, Janssen, Medicamenta, Mylan, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Sunovion, Viatris, outside the submitted work. Dr Giulia Giordano reports personal fees from Angelini, outside the submitted work. Prof. Dr. Stefan Leucht reports personal fees from Angelini, personal fees from Ethos, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Angelini, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Eisai, personal fees from GedeonRichter, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from Karuna, personal fees from Kynexis, personal fees from Lundbeck, personal fees from Medichem, personal fees from Mitsubishi, personal fees from Otsuka, personal fees from NovoNordisk, personal fees from Recordati, personal fees from Rovi, personal fees from Teva, personal fees from Ethos, outside the submitted work. Dr Salazar de Pablo has received honoraria from Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck and Menarini. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2024 Correll et al.)

Links between premorbid physical activity (PA) and disease onset/course in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) remain unclear. The aim was to assess self-reported PA as a predictor of change in percent median BMI (%mBMI) and length of hospital stay (LOS). Five PA domains were assessed via semi-structured interview in adolescents with AN at hospitalization: premorbid PA in school grades 1-6 (PA1-6); PA before AN onset (PA-pre) and after AN onset (PA-post); new, pathological motivation for PA (PA-new); and high intensity PA (PA-high). Eating disorder psychopathology was measured via the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), and current PA (steps/day) with accelerometry. PA1-6 was also assessed in healthy controls (HCs). Using stepwise backward regression models, predictors of %mBMI change and LOS were examined. Compared with 22 HCs (age = 14.7 ± 1.3 years, %mBMI = 102.4 ± 12.1), 25 patients with AN (age = 15.1 ± 1.7 years, %mBMI = 74.8 ± 6.0) reported significantly higher PA1-6 (median, AN = 115 [interquartile range IQR = 75;200] min vs. HC = 68 [IQR = 29;105] min; p = 0.017). PA-post was 244 ± 323% higher than PA-pre. PA1-6 was directly associated with PA-pre ( p = 0.001) but not with PA-post ( p = 0.179) or change in PA-pre to PA-post ( p = 0.735). Lower %mBMI gain was predicted by lower baseline %mBMI ( p = 0.001) and more PA-high ( p = 0.004; r 2 = 0.604). Longer LOS was predicted by higher PA-pre ( p = 0.003, r 2 = 0.368). Self-reported PA may identify a subgroup of youth with AN at risk of less weight gain and prolonged LOS during inpatient treatment for AN.

Introduction: Fluvoxamine is used in children and adolescents ('youths') for treating obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) but also off-label for depressive and anxiety disorders. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between fluvoxamine dose and serum concentrations, independent correlates of fluvoxamine concentrations, and a preliminary therapeutic reference range (TRR) for youths with OCD and treatment response., Methods: Multicenter naturalistic data of a therapeutic drug monitoring service, as well as prospective data of the 'TDM Vigil study' (EudraCT 2013-004881-33), were analyzed. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed by standardized measures, including Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and -Change (CGI-I), with CGI-I of much or very much improved defining treatment response and adverse drug reactions using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of sex, age, body weight, body mass index (BMI), and fluvoxamine dose on fluvoxamine serum concentrations., Results: The study included 70 youths (age = 6.7-19.6 years, OCD = 78%, mean fluvoxamine dose = 140.4 (range = 25-300) mg/d). A weak positive correlation between daily dose and steady-state trough serum concentrations was found (r s = 0.34, p = 0.004), with dose variation explaining 16.2% of serum concentration variability. Multivariable correlates explaining 25.3% of the variance of fluvoxamine concentrations included higher fluvoxamine dose and lower BMI. Considering responders with OCD, the estimated TRR for youths was 55-371 ng/mL, exceeding the TRR for adults with depression of 60-230 ng/mL., Discussion: These preliminary data contribute to the definition of a TRR in youth with OCD treated with fluvoxamine and identify higher BMI as a moderator of lower fluvoxamine concentrations.

Background: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have advantages over oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in preventing relapse and hospitalization in chronically ill patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSDs), but evidence in patients with first-episode/recent-onset, that is, early-phase-SSDs is less clear., Objectives: To assess the relative medium- and long-term efficacy and safety of LAIs versus OAPs in the maintenance treatment of patients with early-phase SSDs., Method: We searched major electronic databases for head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LAIs and OAPs for the maintenance treatment of patients with early-phase-SSDs., Design: Pairwise, random-effects meta-analysis. Relapse/hospitalization and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation) measured at study-endpoint were co-primary outcomes, calculating risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses sought to identify factors moderating differences in efficacy or acceptability between LAIs and OAPs., Results: Across 11 head-to-head RCTs ( n  = 2374, median age = 25.2 years, males = 68.4%, median illness duration = 45.8 weeks) lasting 13-104 (median = 78) weeks, no significant differences emerged between LAIs and OAPs for relapse/hospitalization prevention (RR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.58-1.06, p  = 0.13) and acceptability (RR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.80-1.05, p  = 0.20). The included trials were highly heterogeneous regarding methodology and patient populations. LAIs outperformed OAPs in preventing relapse/hospitalization in studies with stable patients (RR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.45-0.92), pragmatic design (RR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.54-0.82), and strict intent-to-treat approach (RR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.52-0.80). Furthermore, LAIs were associated with better acceptability in studies with schizophrenia patients only (RR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.79-0.95), longer illness duration (RR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.80-0.97), unstable patients (RR = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.81-0.99) and allowed OAP supplementation of LAIs (RR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.81-0.99)., Conclusion: LAIs and OAPs did not differ significantly regarding relapse prevention/hospitalization and acceptability. However, in nine subgroup analyses, LAIs were superior to OAPs in patients with EP-SSDs with indicators of higher quality and/or pragmatic design regarding relapse/hospitalization prevention (four subgroup analyses) and/or reduced all-cause discontinuation (five subgroup analyses), without any instance of OAP superiority versus LAIs. More high-quality pragmatic trials comparing LAIs with OAPs in EP-SSDs are needed., Trial Registration: CRD42023407120 (PROSPERO)., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

We provide here the first bottom-up review of the lived experience of mental disorders in adolescents co-designed, co-conducted and co-written by experts by experience and academics. We screened first-person accounts within and outside the medical field, and discussed them in collaborative workshops involving numerous experts by experience - representing different genders, ethnic and cultural backgrounds, and continents - and their family members and carers. Subsequently, the material was enriched by phenomenologically informed perspectives and shared with all collaborators. The inner subjective experience of adolescents is described for mood disorders, psychotic disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorders, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, externalizing disorders, and self-harm behaviors. The recollection of individuals' past histories also indexes the prodromal (often transdiagnostic) features predating the psychiatric diagnosis. The experience of adolescents with mental disorders in the wider society is described with respect to their family, their school and peers, and the social and cultural context. Furthermore, their lived experience of mental health care is described with respect to receiving a diagnosis of mental disorder, accessing mental health support, receiving psychopharmacological treatment, receiving psychotherapy, experiencing peer support and mental health activism, and achieving recovery. These findings can impact clinical practice, research, and the whole society. We hope that this co-designed, co-conducted and co-written journey can help us maintain our commitment to protecting adolescents' fragile mental health, and can help them develop into a healthy, fulfilling and contributing adult life., (© 2024 World Psychiatric Association.)

Background: Up to 1/2 of outpatients prescribed clozapine may be partially/fully non-adherent, based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Three indices for measuring partial/full non-adherence are proposed a: 1) clozapine concentration/dose (C/D) ratio which drops to half or more of what is expected in the patient; 2) clozapine/norclozapine ratio that becomes inverted; and 3) clozapine concentration that becomes non-detectable., Methods: These 3 proposed indices are based on a literature review and 17 cases of possible non-adherence from 3 samples: 1) an inpatient study in a Chinese hospital, 2) an inpatient randomized clinical trial in a United States hospital, and 3) and a Uruguayan outpatient study., Results: The first index of non-adherence is a clozapine C/D ratio which is less than half the ratio corresponding to the patient's specific ancestry group and sex-smoking subgroup. Knowing the minimum therapeutic dose of the patient based on repeated TDM makes it much easier to establish non-adherence. The second index is inverted clozapine/norclozapine ratios in the absence of alternative explanations. The third index is undetectable concentrations. By using half-lives, the chronology of the 3 indices of non-adherence was modeled in two patients: 1) the clozapine C/D ratio dropped to ≥1/2 of what is expected from the patient (around day 2); 2) the clozapine/norclozapine ratio became inverted (around day 3); and 3) the clozapine concentration became undetectable by the laboratory (around days 9-11)., Conclusion: Prospective studies should further explore these proposed clozapine indices in average patients, poor metabolizers (3 presented) and ultrarapid metabolizers (2 presented)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest GS has received speaker/consultation fees from HLS Therapeutics and Thermo Fisher. AEAY has received speaker/advisory board fees from Janssen, Abdi İbrahim Otsuka and Nobel, and has received investigator fees from Janssen. CBE received honoraria for conferences from Forum pour la formation médicale, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sandoz, Servier, Sunovion, Sysmex Suisse AG, Takeda, Vifor-Pharma, and Zeller in the past 3 years. SRC received speaker/consultation fees from: Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka and Servier and research funding from Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka and Gilead. SHK has received research grants from Janssen and Dongwha. JGL has consulted/spoken on behalf of Saladax Biomedical. RMP has received speaker/consultation fees from Eisai, HLS Therapeutics, Jansen, Lundbeck, and Otsuka. HT has received grants from Daiichi Sankyo and Novartis Pharma; speaker's fees from EA. Pharma, Eisai, Kyowa, Janssen, Lundbeck, Meiji Seika Pharma, MSD, Otsuka, Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda, and Yoshitomiyakuhin; and consulting fees from Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono, and Sumitomo Pharma. CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, LB Pharma and Quantic. In the last 3 years, the remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Pharmacovigilance studies indicate clozapine history is marked by adverse drug reactions (ADRs)., Objective: In a 2021 article, the United Kingdom (UK) had >90 % of European clozapine-related fatal outcomes in VigiBase, the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database. Two possibly opposing hypotheses could explain this disparity: 1) fewer reported fatal outcomes in other Western European countries mainly reflect underreporting to VigiBase, and 2) the higher number of UK reports reflects higher real relative mortality., Methods: VigiBase reports from clozapine's introduction to December 31, 2022, were studied for ADRs and the top 10 causes of fatal outcomes. The UK was compared with 11 other top reporting Western countries (Germany, Denmark, France, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland). Nine countries (except Ireland and Switzerland) were compared after controlling for population and clozapine prescriptions., Results: The UK accounted for 29 % of worldwide clozapine-related fatal outcomes, Germany 2 % and <1 % in each of the other countries. The nonspecific label "death" was the top cause in the world (46 %) and in the UK (33 %). "Pneumonia" was second in the world (8 %), the UK (12 %), Ireland (8 %) and Finland (14 %). Assuming that our corrections for population and clozapine use are correct, other countries underreported only 1-10 % of the UK clozapine fatal outcome number., Conclusions: Different Western European countries consistently underreport to VigiBase compared to the UK, but have different reporting/publishing styles for clozapine-related ADRs/fatal outcomes. Three Scandinavian registries suggest lives are saved as clozapine use increases, but this cannot be studied in pharmacovigilance databases., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest In the last 3 years, JAG reports he is Vice President Scientific Affairs of HLS Therapeutics, Toronto, Canada which is the manufacturer of CLOZARIL in the USA and Canada; CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, LB Pharma and Quantic; RdF has received speaker fees from Janssen Pharmaceutica and travel support from Janssen Pharmaceutica and ROVI; GS has received speaker/consultation fees from Dexcel Pharma, HLS Therapeutics and Thermo Fisher. In the last 3 years, the remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Psychotic depression (PD) is a severe mental disorder leading to functional disability and high risk of suicide, but very little is known about the comparative effectiveness of medications used in its maintenance treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate the comparative effectiveness of specific antipsychotics and antidepressants, and their combinations, on the risk of psychiatric hospitalization among persons with PD in routine care. Persons aged 16-65 years with a first-time diagnosis of PD were identified from Finnish (years 2000-2018) and Swedish (years 2006-2021) nationwide registers of inpatient care, specialized outpatient care, sickness absence, and disability pension. The main exposures were specific antipsychotics and antidepressants, and the main outcome measure was psychiatric hospitalization as a marker of severe relapse. The risk of hospitalization associated with periods of use vs. non-use of medications (expressed as adjusted hazard ratio, aHR) was assessed by a within-individual design, using each individual as his/her own control, and analyzed with stratified Cox models. The two national cohorts were first analyzed separately, and then combined using a fixed-effect meta-analysis. The Finnish cohort included 19,330 persons (mean age: 39.8±14.7 years; 57.9% women) and the Swedish cohort 13,684 persons (mean age: 41.3±14.0 years; 53.5% women). Individual antidepressants associated with a decreased risk of relapse vs. non-use of antidepressants were bupropion (aHR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.85), vortioxetine (aHR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.63-0.96) and venlafaxine (aHR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98). Any long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) (aHR=0.60, 95% CI: 0.45-0.80) and clozapine (aHR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.57-0.91) were associated with a decreased risk of relapse vs. non-use of antipsychotics. Among monotherapies, only vortioxetine (aHR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95) and bupropion (aHR=0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.89) were associated with a significantly decreased risk of relapse vs. non-use of both antidepressants and antipsychotics. In an exploratory analysis of antidepressant-antipsychotic combinations, a decreased relapse risk was found for amitriptyline-olanzapine (aHR=0.45, 95% CI: 0.28-0.71), sertraline-quetiapine (aHR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.67-0.93) and venlafaxine-quetiapine (aHR=0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91) vs. non-use of antidepressants and antipsychotics. Benzodiazepines and related drugs (aHR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.24-1.34) and mirtazapine (aHR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.29) were associated with an increased risk of relapse. These data indicate that, in the maintenance treatment of PD, bupropion, vortioxetine, venlafaxine, any LAI, clozapine, and only few specific antidepressant-antipsychotic combinations are associated with a decreased risk of relapse. These findings challenge the current recommendation by treatment guidelines to combine an antipsychotic with an antidepressant (without further specification) as standard treatment in PD., (© 2024 World Psychiatric Association.)

Background: The literature has paid very little attention to pericarditis, pericardial effusion and pancreatitis during clozapine treatment in children and adolescents., Methods: Cases of clozapine-associated pericarditis and pancreatitis in children were studied using searches in: 1) PubMed (June 16, 2023), and 2) the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database (June 1, 2022), VigiBase. VigiBase uses a logarithmic measure of disproportionality called the information component (IC)., Results: The PubMed search yielded 3 clozapine-associated pericarditis cases, 1 pancreatitis case and 1 with both. VigiBase provided a significant clozapine-associated pericarditis IC = 3.6 with an IC 025  = 2.9 (only 3 cases were expected while 22 were observed). VigiBase provided a significant clozapine-associated pancreatitis IC = 2.2 with an IC 025  = 1.4 (only 3 cases were expected while 16 were observed). In VigiBase clozapine-associated pericarditis and pericardial effusion in youth looked similar and on a continuum with myocarditis, as myocarditis, pericarditis and pancreatitis appeared to occur mainly during clozapine titration. Combining PubMed and VigiBase we identified: 1) 29 cases of at least possible clozapine-associated pericarditis/pericardial effusion (6 probable and 23 possible) including 7 cases with and 22 without myocarditis, and 2) 17 cases of clozapine-associated pancreatitis (1 definite and 16 possible). Two of the pancreatitis cases occurred during overdoses. No fatal outcomes were found in any clozapine-associated pericarditis and pancreatitis cases., Conclusions: Despite the lack of attention in the literature to clozapine-associated pericarditis and pancreatitis, results demonstrate that they can happen in youth, particularly during titration. Pericarditis and pancreatitis appear to be forms of clozapine-associated inflammation during dose titration., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No commercial organizations had any role in the writing of this paper for publication. In the last 3 years, RdF has received speaker fee from Janssen Pharmaceutica and travel support from Janssen Pharmaceutica and ROVI; CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Sage, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, Tolmar, Vertex, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Mindpax, and Quantic; GS has received speaker/consultation fees from Dexcel Pharma, HLS Therapeutics and Thermo Fisher. In the last 3 years, the remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

During weak induction (from smoking and/or valproate co-prescription), clozapine ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs) need very high daily doses to reach the minimum therapeutic concentration of 350 ng/ml in plasma; clozapine UMs need clozapine doses higher than: 1) 900 mg/day in patients of European/African ancestry, or 2) 600 mg/day in those of Asian ancestry. Published clozapine UMs include 10 males of European/African ancestry, mainly assessed with single concentrations. Five new clozapine UMs (two of European and three of Asian ancestry) with repeated assessments are described. A US double-blind randomized trial included a 32-year-old male smoking two packages/day with a minimum therapeutic dose of 1,591 mg/day from a single TDM during open treatment of 900 mg/day. In a Turkish inpatient study, a 30-year-old male smoker was a possible clozapine UM needing a minimum therapeutic dose of 1,029 mg/day estimated from two trough steady-state concentrations on 600 mg/day. In a Chinese study, three possible clozapine UMs (all male smokers) were identified. The clozapine minimum therapeutic dose estimated with trough steady-state concentrations >150 ng/ml was: 1) 625 mg/day, based on a mean of 20 concentrations in Case 3; 2) 673 mg/day, based on a mean of 4 concentrations in Case 4; and 3) 648 mg/day, based on a mean of 11 concentrations in Case 5. Based on these limited studies, clozapine UMs during weak induction may account for 1-2% of clozapine-treated patients of European ancestry and <1% of those of Asian ancestry. A clozapine-to-norclozapine ratio <0.5 should not be used to identify clozapine UMs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest GS has received speaker/consultation fees from HLS Therapeutics and Thermo Fisher. SRC received speaker/consultation fees from: Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka and Servier and research funding from Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka and Gilead. SH Kim has received research grants from Janssen and Dongwha. HT has received grants from Daiichi Sankyo and Novartis Pharma; speaker's fees from EA. Pharma, Eisai, Kyowa, Janssen, Lundbeck, Meiji Seika Pharma, MSD, Otsuka, Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda, and Yoshitomiyakuhin; and consulting fees from Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Ono, and Sumitomo Pharma. CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Denovo, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, Denovo, Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, LB Pharma and Quantic. In the last 3 years, the remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Individuals at risk for bipolar disorder (BD) have a wide range of genetic and non-genetic risk factors, like a positive family history of BD or (sub)threshold affective symptoms. Yet, it is unclear whether these individuals at risk and those diagnosed with BD share similar gray matter brain alterations., Methods: In 410 male and female participants aged 17-35 years, we compared gray matter volume (3T MRI) between individuals at risk for BD (as assessed using the EPI bipolar scale; n = 208), patients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of BD ( n = 87), and healthy controls ( n = 115) using voxel-based morphometry in SPM12/CAT12. We applied conjunction analyses to identify similarities in gray matter volume alterations in individuals at risk and BD patients, relative to healthy controls. We also performed exploratory whole-brain analyses to identify differences in gray matter volume among groups. ComBat was used to harmonize imaging data from seven sites., Results: Both individuals at risk and BD patients showed larger volumes in the right putamen than healthy controls. Furthermore, individuals at risk had smaller volumes in the right inferior occipital gyrus, and BD patients had larger volumes in the left precuneus, compared to healthy controls. These findings were independent of course of illness (number of lifetime manic and depressive episodes, number of hospitalizations), comorbid diagnoses (major depressive disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorder, eating disorder), familial risk, current disease severity (global functioning, remission status), and current medication intake., Conclusions: Our findings indicate that alterations in the right putamen might constitute a vulnerability marker for BD.