1. Hemospray as first-line treatment option for malignant gastrointestinal bleeding: A cost-utility analysis in the United Kingdom.
- Author
-
Cooper DA, Norton B, Hawkes ND, Hebbar S, Telese A, Morris J, Haidry R, and Barkun A
- Abstract
Aims: For managing malignant upper gastrointestinal bleeding (MUGIB), randomised control trial data have shown the haemostatic powder; Hemospray (TC-325), results in greater immediate haemostasis and lower 30-day rebleeding rates than standard endoscopic therapy (SET). We sought to determine if using TC-325 as a first-line option for patients with MUGIB would be cost-effective compared with SET in the United Kingdom., Methods: A decision tree was developed among patients with MUGIB, assessing initial therapy with TC-325 or SET over a 30-day time horizon. Patients with failed initial haemostasis, or a rebleed within 30 days, underwent further endoscopic treatment, escalation to either transcatheter arterial embolisation or surgery, or radiotherapy. Overall, 30-day mortality was applied. Costs, in Great British Pounds, were based on the United Kingdom National Health Services costs for 2023/2024. Results are reported as incremental differences in cost, quality-adjusted life years, and net monetary benefit. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed., Results: The cost of treating MUGIB patients with TC-325 was £245.88 lower than SET, with an incremental increase of 0.001 Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). TC-325 remained cost-saving for sensitivity and scenario analyses. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed TC-325 as more effective and cost-saving in 82.0% of simulations (range 68.8-97.8%)., Conclusions: Initial treatment of MUGIB with TC-325 compared to SET is more effective (higher primary haemostasis and lower 30-day rebleeding) and cost-saving due to requiring fewer interventions, readmissions, and length of stay. Additional studies are needed to address model uncertainties in the follow-up management of these complex patients., Competing Interests: DC is a salaried employee of Cook Medical, a Cook Group Company. AB is a paid consultant for Cook inc. RH has received educational grants to support research infrastructure from Medtronic Ltd., Cook Endoscopy (fellowship support), Pentax Europe, C2 Therapeutics, Beamline Diagnostic, and Fractyl Ltd. BN, NH, SH, AT, JM, have no conflicts of interest., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF