Search

Background: The phase III GIM2 trial showed improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with adjuvant dose-dense (DD) as compared with standard-interval (SI) chemotherapy in women with node-positive early-stage breast cancer (BC). This exploratory analysis aimed to investigate the benefit of different schedules according to body mass index (BMI) in this trial., Patients and Methods: This analysis explored the efficacy, in terms of DFS and OS, of different chemotherapy schedules according to BMI. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for relevant prognostic factors, were used., Results: Out of 2091 patients enrolled, 1925 with known baseline BMI were randomized in the DD versus SI comparison and therefore included in this analysis: 31.6% were overweight and 19.3% obese. Overweight and obesity were significantly associated with postmenopausal status, pT >2, and pN >2 tumors. After a median follow-up of 15.0 years (interquartile range 8.4-16.3 years), multivariable Cox survival models demonstrated no association of different BMI categories on DFS [adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.15 and adjHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91-1.35 for overweight and obese patients, respectively, compared to patients with normal BMI] or OS (adjHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.71-1.14 and adjHR 1.18, 95% CI 0.92-1.52 for overweight and obese patients, respectively). No significant interaction was found between BMI and treatment schedule in terms of DFS (P for interaction  = 0.56) or OS (P for interaction  = 0.19). The survival benefit of DD chemotherapy was observed irrespective of different BMI categories, with a more pronounced benefit for overweight and obese patients., Conclusion: In node-positive BC patients, DD schedule should be considered the preferred schedule irrespective of BMI., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous analyses of the GIM (Gruppo Italiano Mammella) 2 study showed that addition of fluorouracil to epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel in patients with node-positive early breast cancer does not improve outcome, whereas dose-dense chemotherapy induces a significant improvement in both disease-free survival and overall survival as compared with a standard schedule. Here, we present long-term results of the study., Methods: In this 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with operable, node-positive, breast cancer with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 from 81 hospitals in Italy. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1:1) to one of the four following study groups: four cycles of standard-interval intravenous EC (epirubicin 90 mg/m 2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 every 3 weeks, followed by four cycles of intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 every 3 weeks (q3EC-P group); four cycles of intravenous FEC (fluorouracil 600 mg/m 2 , epirubicin 90 mg/m 2 , and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 every 3 weeks, followed by four cycles of intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m 2 ) on day 1 every 3 weeks (q3FEC-P group); dose-dense EC-P regimen, with the same doses and drugs as the q3EC-P group but administered every 2 weeks (q2EC-P group); and the dose-dense FEC-P regimen, with the same doses and drugs as the q3FEC-P group but given every 2 weeks (q2FEC-P). Randomisation, with stratification by centre, with permuted blocks of size 12, was done with a centralised, interactive, internet-based system that randomly generated the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, comparing different chemotherapy schedule (dose-dense vs standard-dose intervals) and regimen (FEC-P vs EC-P). Safety population included all patients that received at least one dose of any study drug according to the treatment received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00433420, and is now closed., Findings: Between April 24, 2003, and July 3, 2006, 2091 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 545 to q3EC-P, 544 to q3FEC-P, 502 to q2EC-P, and 500 to q2FEC-P. 88 patients were enrolled in centres providing only standard interval schedule and were assigned only to q3FEC-P and q3EC-P; thus, 2091 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for the comparison of EC-P (1047 patients) versus FEC-P (1044 patients) and 2003 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for the comparison of dose-dense (1002 patients) versus standard interval analysis (1001 patients). After a median follow-up of 15·1 years (IQR 8·4-16·3), median disease-free survival was not significantly different between FEC-P and EC-P groups (17·09 years [95% CI 15·51-not reached] vs not reached [17·54-not reached]; unadjusted hazard ratio 1·12 [95% CI 0·98-1·29]; log-rank p=0·11). Median disease-free survival was significantly higher in the dose-dense interval group than the standard-interval group (not reached [95% CI 17·45-not reached] vs 16·52 [14·24-17·54]; 0·77 [95% CI 0·67-0·89]; p=0·0004). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (200 [37%] of 536 patients in the q3EC-P group vs 257 [48%] of 533 in the q3FEC-P group vs 50 [10%] of 496 q2EC-P vs 97 [20%] of 492) and alopecia (238 [44%] vs 249 [47%] vs 228 [46%] vs 235 [48%]). During extended follow-up, no further grade 3-4 adverse events or deaths related to toxic-effects were reported. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in nine (2%) patients in the q3EC-P group, seven (1%) in the q3FEC-P group, nine (2%) in the q2EC-P group, and nine (2%) in the q2FEC-P group. No treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: Updated results from the GIM2 study support that optimal adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk early breast cancer should not include fluorouracil and should use a dose-dense schedule., Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmacia, Dompè Biotec Italy, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, and Alliance Against Cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests LDM reports grants or contracts from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, and Seagen; fees or honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Seagen, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, Exact Sciences, and Ipsen; support for attending meetings or travel from Roche, Pfizer, and Eisai; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. FPo reports support for attending meeting from Daichii Sankyo and Gilead; participation on advisory board from AstraZeneca; and fees or honoraria from Eli Lilly and Novartis outside the submitted work. SDP reports honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Seagen, Daichii Sankyo, and MSD outside the submitted work. MG reports fees or honoraria from Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, AstraZeneca, Daichii Sankyo, MSD, and Genomic Health outside the submitted work. MDL reports personal fees from Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Genomic Health, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, and Seagen outside the submitted work. FC reports consulting fees or honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Astrazeneca, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Seagen, and Dompè outside the submitted work. AF reports consulting fees or honoraria and participation on an advisory board from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Dompè, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, Sophos, Epionpharma, Gilead, Seagen, AstraZeneca, and Exact Science outside the submitted work. OG reports consulting fees or honoraria and participation on an advisory board from Daiichi Sanko, AstraZeneca, Seagen, Gilead, Eli-Lilly, and Novartis. MM reports consulting fees or honoraria and participation on an advisory board from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Gilead, Seagen, AstraZeneca, and Gentili outside the submitted work. CB reports fees or honoraria from Novartis, Roche, and Eli Lilly outside the submitted work. FPu reports consulting fees or honoraria and participation on an advisory board from Amgen, Astrazeneca, Daichii Sankyo, Celgene, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Ipsen, MSD–Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Takeda, and Viatris outside the submitted work; and research grants and support from AstraZeneca, Eisai, and Roche outside the submitted work. FM reports fees or honoraria and participation on an advisory board from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Roche, Novartis, Seagen, Pfizer, MSD, and Daiichi Sankyo outside the submitted work. ML reports consulting fees or honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Sandoz, and Takeda outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillary analysis of the GIM2 trial evaluating the absolute treatment effect through a composite measure of recurrence risk (CPRS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative eBC. CPRS was estimated through Cox proportional hazards models applied to the different clinicopathological features. The treatment effect was compared to the values of CPRS by using the Sub-population Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) process. The Disease-Free Survival (DFS)-oriented STEPP analysis showed distinct patterns of relative treatment effect with respect to CPRS. Overall, 5-year DFS differed across CPRS quartiles ranging from 95.2 to 66.4%. Each CPRS quartile was characterized by a different patients' composition, especially for age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and Ki-67. A number needed to treat of 154 and 6 was associated with the lowest and the highest CPRS quartile, respectively. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy showed a consistent benefit in node-positive eBC patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease, but its effect varied according to CPRS.

Despite relevant medical advancements, metastatic breast cancer remains an uncurable disease. HER2 signaling conditions tumor behavior and treatment strategies of HER2 expressing breast cancer. Cancer treatment guidelines uniformly identify dual blockade with pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus a taxane as best first line and trastuzumab emtansine as preferred second line choice. However, there is no prospectively designed available study focusing on the sequence and outcomes of patients treated with T-DM1 following the triplet. In the following report, data concerning a wide series of patients treated in a real-life setting are presented. Results obtained in terms of response and median progression free survival suggests a significant role for T-DM1 in disease control of metastatic HER2 expressing breast cancer., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No one., (Copyright: © 2020 Del Prete et al.)

In recent years, the study of the molecular characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has highlighted a specific role of some genes that represent important therapeutic targets, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS-1) and v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF). Patients with oncogene-addicted cancer benefit more from therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than from chemotherapy. The brain is a preferred site for tumor spread in these patients. In addition, given greater control of extracranial disease and prolonged survival, the brain is often the first site of progression. Therefore, there is great interest in therapeutic approaches that optimize the control of intracranial disease associated with systemic drugs that, by penetrating the blood-brain barrier (BBB), may improve local control. On the latter, radiotherapy provides excellent efficacy but following the results of clinical trials with new brain penetrant drugs, the question of how and especially when to perform brain radiotherapy in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC remains open. Prospective studies may indicate which patients are most likely to benefit from combined use or in what sequence they will undergo systemic and radiotherapy treatment. Due to the heterogeneity of patients and the introduction of new generation TKIs, a multidisciplinary assessment for the best management of therapies in NSCLC patients with molecular driver alterations and brain metastases (BM) is required., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: C Gridelli received honoraria as speaker bureau and advisory board member from Astra Zeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche. M Muto received honoraria as speaker bureau from Astra Zeneca. G Colantuoni received honoraria as advisory board member from Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2019 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Exemestane (Exe) in combination with Everolimus (Eve) represents an important treatment option for patients diagnosed with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which was previously treated with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAI). Data from unselected populations may be useful for defining the optimal therapeutic algorithm within a clinical setting. Data from 264 HR+, HER2-MBC patients who received Exe-Eve treatment in combination, following the failure of NSAIs was retrospectively analyzed. Different lines of endocrine treatment (ET) were investigated to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the treatment within the 'everyday clinical practice' population. The disease control rate (DCR) was 73.1%, with no statistically significant difference among the different settings. At a median follow-up of 42 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) was 11.6, 9.7 and 7.5 months for patients treated with Exe-Eve as first, second or third line therapy, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation with younger age, no previous adjuvant chemotherapy (CT), no previous adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), HT duration ≥36 months, involvement of liver and/or lung, no prior CT for metastatic disease and PS=0 at the start of treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 33.0 months; at a median follow-up of 67 months, the median OS was 43.1, 31.7 and 27.9 months in patients treated with Exe-Eve in first, second or third line therapy, respectively. On multivariate analysis, diabetes and previous CT for metastatic disease were revealed to correlate with a worse outcome. Conversely, the presence of mucositis was significantly associated with long-term survival. Overall, Exe-Eve was typically well tolerated and the majority toxicities were G1 or 2, while treatment discontinuation due to unacceptable toxicity was only required in 5.7% of patients. Despite the limitations due to the observational nature of this study, the findings suggest that treatment with Exe-Eve is an active and safe therapeutic option for endocrine-sensitive MBC patients in a real-world clinical setting, regardless of treatment lines.

Background: Whether addition of fluorouracil to epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel (EC-P) is favourable in adjuvant treatment of patients with node-positive breast cancer is controversial, as is the benefit of increased density of dosing. We aimed to address these questions in terms of improvements in disease-free survival., Methods: In this 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with operable, node positive, early-stage breast cancer from 81 Italian centres. Eligible patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio with a centralised, interactive online system to receive either dose-dense chemotherapy (administered intravenously every 2 weeks with pegfilgrastim support) with fluorouracil plus EC-P (FEC-P) or EC-P or to receive standard-interval chemotherapy (administered intravenously every 3 weeks) with FEC-P or EC-P. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival, assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method in the intention-to-treat population. Our primary comparisons were between dose schedule (every 2 weeks vs every 3 weeks) and dose type (FEC-P vs EC-P). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00433420., Findings: Between April 24, 2003, and July 3, 2006, we recruited 2091 patients. 88 patients were enrolled in centres that only provided standard-intensity dosing. After a median follow-up of 7·0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4·5-6·3), 140 (26%) of 545 patients given EC-P every 3 weeks, 157 (29%) of 544 patients given FEC-P every 3 weeks, 111 (22%) of 502 patients given EC-P every 2 weeks, and 113 (23%) of 500 patients given FEC-P every 2 weeks had a disease-free survival event. For the dose-density comparison, disease-free survival at 5 years was 81% (95% CI 79-84) in patients treated every 2 weeks and 76% (74-79) in patients treated every 3 weeks (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·65-0·92; p=0·004); overall survival rates at 5 years were 94% (93-96) and 89% (87-91; HR 0·65, 0·51-0·84; p=0·001) and for the chemotherapy-type comparison, disease-free survival at 5 years was 78% (75-81) in the FEC-P groups and 79% (76-82) in the EC-P groups (HR 1·06, 0·89-1·25; p=0·561); overall survival rates at 5 years were 91% (89-93) and 92% (90-94; 1·16, 0·91-1·46; p=0·234). Compared with 3 week dosing, chemotherapy every 2 weeks was associated with increased rate of grade 3-4 of anaemia (14 [1·4%] of 988 patients vs two [0·2%] of 984 patients; p=0·002); transaminitis (19 [1·9%] vs four [0·4%]; p=0·001), and myalgias (31 [3·1%] vs 16 [1·6%]; p=0·019), and decreased rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (147 [14·9%] vs 433 [44·0%]; p<0·0001). Addition of fluorouracil led to increased rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (354 [34·5%] of 1025 patients on FEC-P vs 250 [24·2%] of 1032 patients on EC-P; p<0·0001), fever (nine [0·9%] vs two [0·2%]), nausea (47 [4·6%] vs 28 [2·7%]), and vomiting (32 [3·1%] vs 15 [1·4%])., Interpretation: In patients with node-positive early breast cancer, dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival compared with standard interval chemotherapy. Addition of fluorouracil to a sequential EC-P regimen was not associated with an improved disease-free survival outcome., Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmacia, and Dompè Biotec., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Evidence on adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer is poor. We tested whether weekly docetaxel is more effective than standard chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: We carried out a multicenter, randomized phase III study. Women aged 65-79, operated for breast cancer, with average to high risk of recurrence, were allocated 1 : 1 to CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m², methotrexate 40 mg/m², fluorouracil 600 mg/m², days 1, 8) or docetaxel (35 mg/m(2) days 1, 8, 15) every 4 weeks, for four or six cycles according to hormone receptor status. Primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). A geriatric assessment was carried out. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed with EORTC C-30 and BR-23 questionnaires., Results: From July 2003 to April 2011, 302 patients were randomized and 299 (152 allocated CMF and 147 docetaxel) were eligible. After 70-month median follow-up, 109 DFS events were observed. Unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of DFS for docetaxel versus CMF was 1.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83-1.76, P = 0.32]; DFS estimate at 5 years was 0.69 with CMF and 0.65 with docetaxel. HR of death was 1.34 (95% CI 0.80-2.22, P = 0.26). There was no interaction between treatment arms and geriatric scales measuring patients' ability or comorbidities. Hematological toxicity, mucositis and nausea were worse with CMF; allergy, fatigue, hair loss, onychopathy, dysgeusia, diarrhea, abdominal pain, neuropathy, cardiac and skin toxicity were worse with docetaxel. One death was attributed to CMF and two to docetaxel. Increasing age, impairment in instrumental daily living activities, number of comorbidities and docetaxel treatment were independently associated with severe nonhematological toxicity. QoL was worse with docetaxel for nausea-vomiting, appetite loss, diarrhea, body image, future perspective, treatment side-effects and hair loss items., Conclusions: Weekly docetaxel is not more effective than standard CMF as adjuvant treatment of older women with breast cancer and worsens QoL and toxicity., Clinicaltrialsgov: NCT00331097., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: A part of the literature supports the undoubtful advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the overall survival and for the possibility of surgical conservative treatment in locally advanced tumours after downstaging. Other authors report that primitive tumour's surgical removal at first, improves survival in cases with locally advanced /metastatic disease. The advantages were improvement of patient's health status, removal of a reservoir of neoplastic cell neoangiogenic cytokines and growth factors,and cytoreduction., Materials and Methods: Aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness on the survival of a primary surgical treatment of the locally advanced tumours comparing two homogeneous groups. In the first group (GROUP 1) 40 patients were enrolled with stage III A, III B,IV tumours and were treated with primary surgery. The second group (GROUP 2) was made up of 40 patients with similar stage treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The surgical treatment had the intention to remove the entire primary tumour., Results: After a median follow up of 48,2 months,22,5 % of GROUP 1 died and 30 % of GROUP 2. The average survival of patients in GROUP 1 was 27,1 months while in GROUP 2 there was an average survival of 16,8 months., Conclusion: In conclusion surgical treatment plays a key role in the treatment of advanced/metastatic disease and is an independent factor associated with survival.

Background: To measure bone mineral density (BMD) reduction produced by letrozole as compared with tamoxifen and the benefit of the addition of zoledronic acid., Patients and Methods: A phase 3 trial comparing tamoxifen, letrozole or letrozole+zoledronic acid in patients with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer was conducted; triptorelin was given to premenopausal patients. Two comparisons were planned: letrozole versus tamoxifen and letrozole+zoledronic acid versus letrozole. Primary end point was the difference in 1-year change of T-score at lumbar spine (LTS) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scan., Results: Out of 483 patients enrolled, 459 were available for primary analyses. Median age was 50 (range 28-80). The estimated mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) in 1-year change of LTS was equal to -0.30 (95% CI -0.44 to -0.17) in the letrozole versus tamoxifen comparison (P<0.0001) and to +0.60 (95% CI +0.46 to +0.77) in the letrozole+zoledronic acid versus letrozole comparison (P<0.0001). Bone damage by letrozole decreased with increasing baseline body mass index in premenopausal, but not postmenopausal, patients (interaction test P=0.004 and 0.47, respectively)., Conclusions: In the HOBOE (HOrmonal BOne Effects) trial, the positive effect of zoledronic acid on BMD largely counteracts damage produced by letrozole as compared with tamoxifen. Letrozole effect is lower among overweight/obese premenopausal patients.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of all new lung cancer diagnosis. The majority of people with NSCLC are unsuitable for surgery since most patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis. About 60% of brain metastases arise from lung cancer. Therapeutic approaches to brain metastases include surgery, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy and new biologic agents. Angiogenesis is essential for the development and progression of cancer, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a critical mediator of tumour angiogenesis. One of the targeted approaches most widely studied in the treatment of NSCLC is the inhibition of angiogenesis. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, is the first targeted agent which, when combined with chemotherapy, has shown superior efficacy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases have initially been excluded from bevacizumab trials for the risk of cerebral haemorrhage as a result of the treatment. Nevertheless, the available data suggest an equal risk of intracranial bleeding in patients with CNS metastases treated with or without bevacizumab therapy. Several other anti-angiogenetic drugs are being investigated in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients, but results of their activity specifically in CNS metastases are still lacking. This review will focus on the potential role of bevacizumab and other anti-angiogenetic agents in the treatment of brain metastases from NSCLC.

Angiogenesis is known to be essential for the development and progression of cancer. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a critical mediator in tumor angiogenesis for many solid malignancies, including breast cancer. Increased levels of VEGF have been associated with poor clinical outcomes, including reduced survival. VEGF has become an attractive target for cancer therapy in view of its pivotal role in angiogenesis. The primary approaches for inhibiting angiogenesis have focused on inhibiting the activity of VEGF, either by targeting the VEGF ligand itself with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or by interfering with the signaling events downstream of VEGF through the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Bevacizumab is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal IgG1, anti-VEGF antibody that has demonstrated significant clinical benefit in several solid tumors. Bevacizumab has been approved for use in combination with paclitaxel for the first line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on the results of the randomized phase III E2100 trial in which it improves response rate and time to progress when administered with weekly paclitaxel until disease progression. Several trials to define the role of bevacizumab in different setting of disease and in combination with different chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapy in breast cancer patients are ongoing. Other small molecule inhibitors of VEGF tyrosine kinase activity (TKIs) such as sunitinib, vandetanib and sorafenib are being tested in MBC. This review will focus on bevacizumab and on the developements of the main antiangiogenic agents in the treatment of breast cancer.

Lung cancer in the older individual is an increasingly common problem faced by the oncologist. Elderly patients over 70 years account about 40% of lung cancer patients. Performance Status 2 patients represent a significantly high proportion of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (30-40%) when population-based surveys are conducted. Thus, unfit older patients represent a significant proportion of advanced NSCLC patients, for whom specific prospective data are very scarce. Elderly cancer patients often present with medical and physiological challenges that make the selection of their optimal treatment daunting. Single-agent chemotherapy should be considered the standard treatment for unfit older patients with advanced NSCLC. Molecularly targeted therapies as erlotinib and gefitinib, if approved for use in the next future also in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, may represent a valid alternative to single-agent chemotherapy for a large proportion of unfit older patients because of their more favourable safety profile. However, specific prospective investigation is absolutely warranted for this special population.

Targeting vasculature, essential in oxygen and nutrient supply, represents a new frontier in the treatment of cancer. Apart from angiogenesis inhibitors that compromise the formation of new blood vessels, a second class of vascular disrupting agents (VDAs) targets endothelial cells and pericytes of the already established tumor vasculature, resulting in tumor ischemia and necrosis. VDAs have been divided into two types: ligand-directed VDAs and small molecules. Ligand-directed VDAs consist of targeting and effector moieties that are linked together. Their clinical efficacy appears limited because of cost and a lack of specificity and toxicity. Small molecules include two classes: the synthetic flavonoids, which work through induction of local cytokine production, and the tubulin-binding agents. The aim of this review is to discuss the hypothesized molecular mechanisms of action of VDAs and their early preclinical and clinical results, emphasizing ASA404, combretastatin A-4 disodium phosphate, ABT-751, and NPI-2358, reported in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and also to discuss future developments in this cancer population.

Non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a lethal disease with poor prognosis. The main percentage of NSCLC patients are diagnosed to have an advanced disease. Standard treatment, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, has apparently reached a plateau of effectiveness in improving survival of advanced NSCLC patients. Hence, considerable efforts have started to be made in order to identify novel targets for new biological agents which may safely and effectively be administered to advanced NSCLC patients. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors play an essential role in tumour proliferation. Approaches targeting EGFR and VEGF include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small molecules inhibiting the corresponding receptor-tyrosine kinase activity. Erlotinib is a small molecule inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine-kinase which has brought significant improvements in median survival, quality of life and related symptoms, in an unselected population of advanced NSCLC patients in the second- or third-line setting. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF recombinant humanized mAb, is the first targeted agent which, when combined with chemotherapy, reported superior efficacy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. ZD6474, a small molecule targeting VEGF tyrosine-kinase activity, showing early evidence of antitumour activity and the excellent toxicity profile, seems to be a promising agent for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This review shows the latest and the future developments of erlotinib, bevacizumab and ZD6474 in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients.

Platinum-based doublets are the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, with approximately a third of patients obtaining an objective response with first-line chemotherapy and another 20-30% achieving temporary disease stabilization. However, all patients inevitably experience disease progression. Three agents are approved for treating patients who progress after one prior regimen: docetaxel, pemetrexed and erlotinib. Erlotinib is the only agent approved for use in the third-line setting. Although these agents have yielded similar outcomes in terms of anti-tumor activity and efficacy, they have different toxicity profiles, and some factors that can help in the choice among them have begun to emerge, such as smoking history and histotype. Several new molecularly targeted agents have shown activity in Phase II trials and may be integrated into second-line therapy as single agents or in combination with current agents in the future. In particular, the most encouraging data in this clinical setting have been reported with the antiangiogenetic drugs bevacizumab (already approved for use in the first-line setting), vandetanib and sunitinib. Phase III trials with these agents are ongoing.

Objective: To study the effects of GM-CSF and IL-1beta, both implicated in tissue damage in arthritis, on articular chondrocyte proliferation and metabolism, and to explore their agonist/antagonist effects., Methods: Chondrocytes were obtained from 1-month-old rats. First-passage monolayers were incubated for 24 h with or without GM-CSF and/or IL-1beta, and labeled with 3H-thymidine, 35S-SO4 and 14C-proline. Proteoglycan and collagen synthesis were analyzed by liquid chromatography and SDS-PAGE. Gene expression was measured by RT-PCR., Results: IL-1beta exerts potent, and GM-CSF weak, inhibitory effects on DNA synthesis. GM-CSF strongly stimulates, and IL-1beta inhibits, proteoglycan and collagen synthesis. IL-1beta suppresses the effect of GM-CSF, and increases the release of radioactive molecules from pre-labeled cartilage fragments; GM-CSF decreases the IL-1beta-induced effect. Interestingly, both cytokines induce the expression of each other's gene., Conclusions: IL-1beta appears to be a catabolic and anti-anabolic agent for chondrocytes, whereas GM-CSF is mainly anabolic, and blocks the IL-1beta-induced catabolic effect. It is postulated that both agents are implicated in inflammation: IL-1beta promotes tissue catabolism and destruction, whereas GM-CSF enhances tissue reconstruction.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a major problem worldwide. Since most patients with NSCLC have advanced disease at diagnosis, to date, chemotherapy, with third-generation platinum-based doublets, represents the standard of care. However, a plateau has been reached with the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. Advances in the knowledge of tumour biology and mechanisms of oncogenesis have granted the singling out of several molecular targets for NSCLC treatment. To date, erlotinib and gefitinib, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) inhibitors have been licensed, erlotinib worldwide and gefitinib in Asian countries, for refractory NSCLC. Currently, bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, is the only clinically available antiangiogenic agent licensed, in combination with carboplatin plus paclitaxel, for first-line therapy of advanced NSCLC patients in the United States. Several new biologic agents are being evaluated in clinical research and some of them, such as ZD6474, sorafenib and sunitinib, due to the reported preliminary results and the oral administration seem to be promising targeted agents for the treatment of NSCLC. Aim of this review is to discuss about the new insights in targeted agents development for the treatment of NSCLC patients.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays an essential role in normal cell growth and differentiation, and is involved in tumour proliferation and survival. EGFR overexpression is a common feature in solid malignancies, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and is associated with poor clinical prognosis. Erlotinib is a small-molecule inhibitor of EGFR tyrosine kinase, showing a significant improvement in median survival, quality of life and related symptoms in an unselected population of advanced NSCLC patients in the second- or third-line setting. Erlotinib is well tolerated (with common toxicities including rash and diarrhoea) when administered at a standard oral daily dose of 150 mg. Further investigations are ongoing to contribute to our understanding of the role of erlotinib in NSCLC treatment.

Introduction: We report the cases of three patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer responding to erlotinib after progression under gefitinib treatment., Methods: Three never-smoker women with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, two pretreated with chemotherapy and with gefitinib and one with gefitinib alone, received erlotinib in a daily dose of 150 mg. All three patients had disease progression and had achieved tumor control with gefitinib., Results: The first patient achieved partial response of lung lesions, the second had partial response of brain lesions and stable disease of lung and bone disease, and the third had partial response of brain lesions and stable disease of lung disease. At the time of this analysis, all three patients were still receiving treatment with erlotinib with no evidence of treatment failure after more than 13, 13, and 7 months, respectively. Erlotinib was generally well tolerated, with grade 1 skin toxicity recorded in two patients., Conclusions: Erlotinib may be effective in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were previously and successfully treated with gefitinib. However, careful selection of these patients is needed.

Despite the optimization of chemotherapy regimens, treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are still considered to be disappointing. Thus, clinical research of new treatment strategies is warranted. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in NSCLC, but to date, only a few of these new agents can offer hope of a substantial impact on the natural history of the disease. One of the main reasons for the failure of several clinical trials of targeted therapy in lung cancer is that there is multilevel cross-stimulation among the targets of the new biological agents along several pathways of signal transduction that lead to neoplastic events; blocking only one of these pathways, as most first-generation targeted agents do, allows others to act as salvage or escape mechanisms for cancer cells. Sorafenib and sunitinib are two oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that inhibits the kinase activity of both C-RAF and B-RAF and targets the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor family (VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor family (PDGFR-beta and stem cell factor receptor [KIT]). Sunitinib is a multitargeted inhibitor of PDGFR, KIT, fms-like tyrosine kinase 3, and VEGFR. The kinases targeted and inhibited by sorafenib and sunitinib directly and indirectly regulate tumor growth, survival, and angiogenesis, and this might be expected to result in broad antitumor efficacy. Sorafenib and sunitinib have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma; sunitinib has also been approved for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Their mechanism of action, preclinical data, and phase II studies suggest efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

We have evaluated the activity and safety of gefitinib, a small-molecule epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with docetaxel as first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In total, 41 patients with MBC were enrolled in a first-line combination therapy study with oral gefitinib (250 mg day(-1)) and intravenous docetaxel (75 mg m(-2), the first 14 patients; or 100 mg m(-2), the following 27 patients, on day 1 of a 3-week cycle). Out of 41 patients, 38 received at least one cycle of therapy. There were no differences in activity or tolerability between the two docetaxel doses. G3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (49%), diarrhoea (10%), acne-like rash (5%), and anaemia (2%). Complete plus partial responses (CR+PR) were observed in 22 out of 41 patients with a 54% response rate (95% confidence interval (CI) 45-75%). The 22 patients that achieved a response following six cycles of docetaxel plus gefitinib continued gefitinib monotherapy (median duration, 24 weeks; range, 2-108+ weeks). Two patients with PR following combination therapy achieved a CR during gefitinib monotherapy. Complete plus partial responses correlated with oestrogen receptor (ER) status, since they occurred in 19 out of 27 (70%) patients with ER-positive tumours as compared to three out of 14 (21%) patients with ER-negative tumours (P=0.01).

The elderly and patients with Performance Status (PS) of 2, constitute the so-called special patient population. The tolerability of chemotherapy in this population is globally worse, and treatment approaches should be different. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy is currently recommended as the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its role in special patient population is controversial. The best treatment for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is still debated. In the first randomized study dedicated to elderly NSCLC patients, single-agent vinorelbine showed superiority over supportive care alone, both in terms of survival and quality of life. In a large randomized trial, gemcitabine plus vinorelbine failed to show any advantage over either agent alone. Subset analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with an acceptable increase in toxicity for elderly patients. However, the role of platin-based chemotherapy needs to be defined in prospective randomised trials. With the current evidence, single-agent chemotherapy with a third-generation drug (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, taxanes) should be the recommended option for non-selected elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Also for PS2 patients there is no consensus on standard treatment. On the basis of current evidence, chemotherapy treatment appears justified for patients with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Single-agent chemotherapy (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxanes) could be the preferred option, although carboplatin-based or low-dose cisplatin-based doublets may represent alternative options. Stronger evidence is expected from new clinical research specifically focused on PS2 patients. High priority should be given to the evaluation of tolerability and efficacy of platinum-based combinations and role of new targeted therapies.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. At present, the only high rate of cure therapy is surgical resection at early stage of disease. Early detection could potentially decrease lung cancer mortality suggesting that this cancer should be a good candidate for screening. Results of trials involving chest X-ray, sputum cytology and low-dose computed tomography (CT) are discussed here. The latter tool offers advantages over chest X-ray, but final results from controlled well conducted trials are necessary before the real utility of CT mass screening can be determined. Further approaches to secondary prevention such as screening with positron emission tomography (PET), autofluorescence bronchoscopy and biomarkers hold great promise for the future.

Aims: To further characterize factors secreted in vitro by osteoarthritic and rheumatoid arthritis synovial membranes that inhibit DNA synthesis by cultured human articular chondrocytes, and extend these findings to synovial fluid., Material and Methods: Synovial tissue, synovial fluid and articular cartilage were obtained at surgery from two patients suffering rheumatoid arthritis and two other patients suffering from osteoarthritis. Synovial tissue was incubated in DMEM, then condition media and synovial fluids were extracted with methanol. Methanol extracts and extracted residues (hyaluronic acid, proteins) were assayed for their capacity to inhibit DNA synthesis in articular chondrocytes. Methanol extracts were also fractionated by thin layer chromatography on silica-coated plates and recovered fractions similarly tested., Results: All extracts exhibited strong and concentration-dependent inhibition of [3H]-thymidine incorporation. The most potent inhibition was obtained with the extracts from rheumatoid joints and the least potent inhibition was with synovial fluids. The removal of active substances with methanol leaves an inactive residue. Methanol extraction does not alter the mitogenic activity of five exogenous growth factors and two cytokines, thus suggesting that such activity is entirely due to lipids. The bulk of anti-mitotic factors extracted by methanol co-migrate when fractionated by thin layer chromatography on silica-coated plates with arachidonic acid and its lipo-oxygenase metabolites., In Conclusion: Inflamed synovium produces and releases lipids, most probably arachidonic acid metabolites that inhibit cell proliferation thus limiting inflammation and pannus formation in arthritis.

Purpose: To study the prognostic value for overall survival of baseline assessment of functional status, comorbidity, and quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Data from 566 patients enrolled onto the phase III randomized Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) study were analyzed. Functional status was measured as activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL). The presence of comorbidity was assessed with a checklist of 33 items; items 29 and 30 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire QLQ-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were used to estimate QoL. ADL was dichotomized as none versus one or more dependency. For IADL and QoL, three categories were defined using first and third quartiles as cut points. Comorbidity was summarized using the Charlson scale. Analysis was performed by Cox model, and stratified by treatment arm., Results: Better values of baseline QoL (P = .0003) and IADL (P = .04) were significantly associated with better prognosis, whereas ADL (P = .44) and Charlson score (P = .66) had no prognostic value. Performance status 2 (P = .006) and a higher number of metastatic sites (P = .02) also predicted shorter overall survival., Conclusions: Pretreatment global QoL and IADL scores, but not ADL and comorbidity, have significant prognostic value for survival of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who were treated with chemotherapy. Using these scores in clinical practice might improve prognostic prediction for treatment planning.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for SCLC. In limited disease, the median survival time is about 12-16 months, with a 4%-5% long-term survival rate; in extensive disease the median survival time is 7-11 months. More than 50% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed when they are over the age of 65, and about 30% are over 70. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared with their younger counterparts, because of age-related progressive reductions in organ function and comorbidities. The standard therapy for limited disease is combined chemoradiotherapy, followed by prophylactic brain irradiation for patients achieving complete responses. In the elderly, the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy must be carefully evaluated, considering the slight survival benefit and potential for substantial toxicity incurred with this treatment. The best approach is to design clinical trials that specifically include geriatric assessment to develop active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for elderly SCLC patients. Survival improvement for SCLC patients requires a better understanding of tumor biology and the subsequent development of novel therapeutic strategies. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in SCLC, but a minority of these new agents offers a promise of improved outcomes, and negative results are reported more commonly than positive ones. This review focuses on the main issues in the treatment of elderly SCLC patients.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer deaths in both men and women worldwide and has a poor prognosis. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents approximately 80% of all lung cancers. Surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC but only 15-20% of tumours can be radically resected with a survival of about 40% at 5 years. Considering these disappointing results NSCLC is one of the most frequent subjects of clinical research worldwide. Italy is playing an important role in the clinical research of NSCLC performing phase I, II and III trials, prevalently by cooperative groups, and achieving important results that contributed to define the standard treatment for NSCLC patients. In particular, Italy is leader in the clinical research of the treatment of advanced NSCLC elderly patients. Today, large controlled clinical trials are ongoing. In this paper we analyse and discuss the main trials performed by Italian groups in the fields of NSCLC.

Breast cancer arises in about 48% of patients older than 65 years and more than 30% occurs in those over 70 years being the leading cause of cancer-related death in women older than 65. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared to their younger counterpart because of progressive reduction of organ function and comorbidities related to age. For this reason, the elderly have been excluded from or underrepresented in most cancer studies and, in clinical practice, they often receive inadequate and untested treatments. For adjuvant chemotherapy, a low percentage of patients over 70 years of age were included in few trials and always in a proportion much lower than the prevalence of cancer in that age group. Adjuvant chemotherapy, preferably including an anthracycline especially in patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumours, seems to be beneficial in older women who have substantial risk of dying of breast cancer. To date even if there is no specifically randomised study, single-agent chemotherapy probably might be considered a reasonable treatment for advanced breast cancer in the elderly. One of the actual main field of clinical research in the treatment of breast cancer is the role of targeted therapies. Chronologic age is a risk factor for toxicities such as myelosuppression and mucositis, and older patients may require more supportive care. In order to plan medical treatment in breast cancer elderly patients is mandatory to practice a comprehensive geriatric assessment that includes evaluation of comorbidities, functional dependence, socio-economic, emotional and cognitive conditions, an estimate of life expectancy and recognition of frailty. The authors review the literature regarding age-specific chemotherapeutic issues in the management of breast cancer elderly patients.

Lung cancer is the leading world-wide cause of cancer death. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20-25% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment of SCLC. In limited disease, median survival is about 12-16 months with 4-5% of long-term survivors, in extensive disease median survival is 7-11 months. Improving the survival rate of patients with SCLC requires a better understanding of tumour biology and the subsequent development of novel therapeutic strategies. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in SCLC and some phase III studies have already produced definitive results. Currently, the minority of these new agents offers a promise of improved outcomes, and negative results are more commonly reported than positive ones. To date, no targeted therapy has been approved for use in the treatment of patients with SCLC. This review will focus on the main novel biologic agents investigated in the treatment of SCLC.

Purpose: To evaluate the tolerabiliy and activity of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Materials and Methods: From July 2001 to August 2003, we analysed, retrospectively, the data of 125 previously treated advanced NSCLC patients receiving gefitinib 250 mg, orally once daily in a compassionate use program., Results: Main toxicity was (% of patients): grade 1-2 skin changes in 7 (5.0%) and 8 (6.4%) patients, respectively. Grade 1 diarrhea in 16 (12.8%) patients. Grade 1 and 2 hypertransaminasemia in 1 (0.8%) patient, respectively. Grade 2 onychopathy in 1 (0.8%) patient and epistaxis in 1 (0.8%) case. There were 1 complete response (0.8%), 6 partial responses (4.8%) and 22 (17.6%) stable disease with an overall control of disease in 23.2% of cases. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.8 and 21.5 weeks, respectively., Conclusion: Gefitinib is active, feasible and well-tolerated in pretreated patients affected by advanced NSCLC.

Overexpression of HER-2/neu in breast cancer has been associated with more aggressive disease and poor overall survival. Trastuzumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody with high affinity for the HER-2 protein, inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells overexpressing HER-2. Trastuzumab showed, as second-line treatment, 15% of objective response in metastatic breast cancer. Bone marrow metastases are detectable in 23% of the patients with advanced breast cancer at first relapse and this rate increases in patients with metastatic disease. We report a case of a complete response of bone marrow metastases from breast cancer using a 3-weekly trastuzumab schedule, in a heavily pretreated patient with severe symptomatic pancytopenia.

Chondrocytes were released from articular cartilage fragments of 6-week-old Wistar rats by a 2-hour treatment with bacterial collagenase. The cells from one animal were seeded in a 25-cm2 culture flask at a density of 10(5) cells/cm2. After 1 h, the flask was gently shaken and the medium, containing nonadherent cells, was transferred to a new flask. The attached cells were incubated with 5 ml of fresh medium. This procedure was repeated after 3, 24, 48 and 96 h. Resulting cell populations were then analyzed. The earlier cells attached, the more rapidly they proliferated, and the less collagen and proteoglycan (PG) they produced. The cells that attached after 24 h grew much more slowly, piled up in many areas, exhibited strong alkaline phosphatase activity and calcified extracellular matrix (ECM). Differences in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and protein/PG synthesis were also observed when these cell populations were challenged with growth factors and 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). Pretreatment of cells for 2 h with PMA strongly enhanced DNA and PG synthesis only in cultures containing insulin-like growth factor-1. Nonselected rat articular chondrocytes (AC) subcultured at least four times as monolayers still expressed mRNA specific for aggrecan and type II collagen, suggesting conservation of the chondrogenic phenotype. In conclusion, AC of young individuals seem to be heterogeneous with respect to their capacity to proliferate and synthesize ECM. By selecting and expanding in vitro the appropriate cell population, this method could be potentially useful for studies aimed at repairing damaged cartilage.

The present study describes supportive care (SC) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), evaluating whether it is affected by concomitant chemotherapy, patient's performance status (PS) and age. Data of patients enrolled in three randomised trials of first-line chemotherapy, conducted between 1996 and 2001, were pooled. The analysis was limited to the first three cycles of treatment. Supportive care data were available for 1185 out of 1312 (90%) enrolled patients. Gastrointestinal drugs (45.7%), corticosteroids (33.4%) and analgesics (23.8%) were the most frequently observed categories. The mean number of drugs per patient was 2.43; 538 patients (45.4%) assumed three or more supportive drugs. Vinorelbine does not produce substantial variations in the SC pattern, while cisplatin-based treatment requires an overall higher number of supportive drugs, with higher use of antiemetics (41 vs 27%) and antianaemics (10 vs 4%). Patients with worse PS are more exposed to corticosteroids (42 vs 30%). Elderly patients require drugs against concomitant diseases significantly more than adults (20 vs 7%) and are less frequently exposed to antiemetics (12 vs 27%). In conclusion, polypharmacotherapy is a relevant issue in patients with advanced NSCLC. Chemotherapy does not remarkably affect the pattern of SC, except for some drugs against side effects. Elderly patients assume more drugs for concomitant diseases and receive less antiemetics than adults.

Background: Breast cancer arises in about 48% of patients (pts) older than 65 years. Chemotherapy is administered to elderly pts with advanced breast cancer (ABC) resistant to hormonal treatment or with visceral metastases. Vinorelbine (VNR), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, is active and well-tolerated in ABC reporting, as a single agent, an objective response (OR) rate of 41%-60%. The ELVIS (Elderly Lung cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study) trial demonstrated the tolerability and efficacy of VNR in elderly pts with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (JNCI 91: 66-72, 1999)., Materials and Methods: From January 1999 to December 2000, we analysed, retrospectively, our data about single-agent VNR as a first-line chemotherapy in elderly pts (> or = 70 years) with ABC. Twenty-four pts were analysed. VNR was administered at the dose of 30 mg/m2, i.v., days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles., Results: The main toxicity was (% of pts): grade (G) 3-4 neutropenia 25%; G 2 thrombocytopenia 4.1%; G 2 asthenia 25%; G 2-3 constipation 16.6%; and G 1 neurotoxicity 25%. No cycles of chemotherapy were omitted or postponed. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was administered in 12.5% of a total of 112 cycles. Nine (37.5%) objective responses (2 complete and 7 partial responses) were observed. The median duration of response and survival were 7 and 11 months, respectively., Conclusion: These results suggest that single agent VNR is active and well-tolerated in elderly pts with ABC. Further prospective trials are warranted.

The effects of synovial conditioned medium (SCM) on DNA, proteoglycan (PG), and protein-collagen synthesis and respective gene expressions, in human articular chondrocytes (AC) and DNA synthesis in synovial fibroblasts (SFb), were studied in monolayer culture. All SCM exhibited concentration-dependent inhibition of [3H]thymidine incorporation in both AC and SFb. In contrast, SCM from three OA patients stimulated [35S]SO4 and [3H]glycine incorporations and the expression (RT-PCR) of aggrecan- and type II collagen-specific mRNAs in AC. The production of agents that inhibit DNA synthesis was blocked by indomethacin and dexamethasone and stimulated by IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha. The inhibitory substances were not produced by heat-inactivated tissue nor cultured SFb or AC and were completely solubles in methanol. It is postulated that synovial tissue secretes lipids, most probably arachidonic acid metabolites. These may counteract growth of an inflammatory synovial pannus by inhibiting SFb proliferation and enhance repair of damaged tissues by stimulating the matrix synthesis.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may be considered typical of advanced age. More than 50% of NSCLC patients are diagnosed over the age of 65 and approximately one-third of all patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are over the age of 70. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly as compared to their younger counterparts, because of the progressive reduction of organ function and comorbidities related to age. For this reason, these patients are often not considered eligible for aggressive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the standard medical treatment of advanced NSCLC. At present, for early stages of the disease there are no indications for adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combined chemo-radiotherapy in locally advanced disease increases toxicity and seems to determine no survival advantage as compared to the radiation therapy alone. In advanced disease, single agent vinorelbine has proven to be active and well-tolerated, and compared to best supportive care, improves survival and perhaps even the quality of life. Gemcitabine is active and well tolerated as well. Taxanes are in advanced phase of evaluation. A phase III randomized trial showed that polychemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine does not improve any outcome as compared to single agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine. In clinical practice, single agent chemotherapy should remain the standard treatment. The two main research-lines to be explored in the near future are the introduction of biological agents in the treatment schemes and the development of specifically designed schedules of cisplatin-based regimens. However, practicing a multidimensional geriatric awsessment for individualized treatment choice in NSCLC elderly patients is mandatory.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on rat articular chondrocyte (AC) with respect to DNA synthesis, collagen type II and proteoglycan (PG) synthesis and expression, and cAMP production; to examine these cells for the presence of GM-CSF-specific binding sites; and to study their regulation by growth factors and cytokines., Methods: First passage monolayers of rat AC were incubated with various concentrations of recombinant human GM-CSF, and then [3H]-thymidine, [3H]-proline, and [35S]SO4 incorporation and cAMP production were measured. The density of GM-CSF-specific binding sites, the effects of growth factors and cytokines on receptor density, and the activation of certain post-receptor signaling pathways were also examined by labeling the cell monolayers with [125I]-GM-CSF., Results: GM-CSF (6-100 U/ml) inhibited (30%) [3H]-thymidine incorporation into DNA, and, in contrast, stimulated up to 3.6- and 2-fold [35S]SO4 and [3H]-proline incorporation into glycosaminoglycan side chains and collagen molecules, respectively. GM-CSF also increased aggrecan and type II collagen (Coll II) transcripts by 2- to 3-fold, respectively. These effects were associated with a concentration-dependent increase in cAMP production. A single class of high affinity (Kd = 98 pM; Bmax = 7.08 pM/microg DNA) binding sites of about 220 kDa were found. The [125I]-GM-CSF binding to the cells was slightly increased with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), insulin-like growth factor-I, platelet derived growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and decreased with pertussis toxin, cholera toxin, and interleukin-1beta., Conclusion: These results suggest that GM-CSF may play a role in the regulation of chondrocyte metabolism as an anabolic agent and may stimulate cartilage healing under pathological conditions.

Aims and Background: The treatment of elderly patients with metastatic solid tumours is still a debated problem. Patients over 75 years are generally excluded from combination chemotherapy trials because of higher toxicity. Several clinical studies have shown that weekly low dose epirubicin is a well tolerated and effective treatment for elderly cancer patients (breast, prostate, lung)., Methods: We report a study of patients aged between 75 and 85 years affected by metastatic anthracyclines-sensible carcinomas, to assess the tolerance of epirubicin given weekly at a dose of 25 mg/m2., Results: 25 patients (13 males, 12 females; ECOG P.S. 0-2) entered the study and were evaluable for side effects. One-hundred and ninety-six cycles of therapy have been administered. Side effects were never severe. Mucositis (9 patients), leucopenia (7 patients), anemia (5 patients) were usually of grade 1 or 2. Grade 1 cardiotoxicity (tachycardia) was observed in only one case. Grade 3 toxicity consisted in anemia (1 patient) and mucositis (1 patient), while grade 4 toxicity never occurred. Nineteen patients were evaluable for response: 0 CR, 4 PR (1 lung, 3 breast), 8 SD (3 lung, 3 breast, 2 prostate) have been observed. Compliance was encouraging and the majority of patients showed a decrease in symptoms and an improvement in performance status., Conclusions: Weekly low-dose epirubicin is a very well tolerated treatment in elderly cancer patients. In view of the negligible toxicity encountered, it could be of utility to test this regimen in patients aged 75 years or older, affected by anthracyclines-sensible metastatic tumors, also to assess activity.

Cis-platin (DDP) has proved to be highly active in the treatment of ovarian adenocarcinoma. The Authors have treated 12 patients with istologically proven advanced ovarian carcinoma with a type of alternating regimen consisting of four weekly DDP courses (1 mg/kg b.w./week) followed by monthly courses high-dose methotrexate (750 mg/mq i.v.) plus cyclophosphamide (250 mg/mq for 5 days) (Mecy). The alternating regimen DDP + Mecy proved to have significant activity as a salvace chemiotherapy regimen for patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma.