1. Simplified meal announcement study (SMASH) using hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomised controlled two-centre crossover trial.
- Author
-
Laesser CI, Piazza C, Schorno N, Nick F, Kastrati L, Zueger T, Barnard-Kelly K, Wilinska ME, Nakas CT, Hovorka R, Herzig D, Konrad D, and Bally L
- Subjects
- Humans, Adolescent, Female, Male, Young Adult, Child, Meals, Switzerland, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Glycemic Control methods, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 drug therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 blood, Cross-Over Studies, Insulin Infusion Systems, Insulin administration & dosage, Insulin therapeutic use, Blood Glucose metabolism, Hypoglycemic Agents administration & dosage, Hypoglycemic Agents therapeutic use
- Abstract
Aims/hypothesis: The majority of hybrid closed-loop systems still require carbohydrate counting (CC) but the evidence for its justification remains limited. Here, we evaluated glucose control with simplified meal announcement (SMA) vs CC in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes using the mylife CamAPS FX system., Methods: We conducted a two-centre, randomised crossover, non-inferiority trial in two University Hospitals in Switzerland in 46 participants (aged 12-20 years) with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections (n=35), sensor-augmented pump (n=4) or hybrid closed-loop (n=7) therapy before enrolment. Participants underwent two 3 month periods with the mylife CamAPS FX system (YpsoPump, Dexcom G6) to compare SMA (individualised carbohydrate meal sizes) with CC, in a randomly assigned order using computer-generated sequences. The primary endpoint was the proportion of time glucose was in target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/l) with a non-inferiority margin of 5 percentage points. Secondary endpoints were other sensor glucose and insulin metrics, usability and safety endpoints., Results: Forty-three participants (18 women and girls) completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat analysis, time in range (mean±SD) was 69.9±12.4% with SMA and 70.7±13.0% with CC (estimated mean difference -0.6 percentage points [95% CI -2.4, 1.1], demonstrating non-inferiority). Time <3.9 mmol/l (median [IQR] 1.8 [1.2-2.2]% vs 1.9 [1.6-2.5]%) and >10.0 mmol/l (28.2±12.6% vs 27.2±13.4%) was similar between periods. Total daily insulin dose was higher with SMA (54.0±14.7 U vs 51.7±12.1 U, p=0.037). Three participants experienced serious adverse events, none of which were intervention-related., Conclusions/interpretation: Glucose control using the CamAPS FX algorithm with SMA was non-inferior to its use with CC in youth and young adults with type 1 diabetes., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05481034., Funding: The study was supported by the Swiss Diabetes Foundation and by a YTCR grant from the Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation and the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. Dexcom and Ypsomed provided product support., Competing Interests: Acknowledgements: We are grateful to study volunteers for their participation. We acknowledge support by L. Cavalli, E. Leu, C. Gisler (UDEM, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland), M. Vajner and S. Rocha (Division of Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland) who contributed to participant care, logistical and administrative management of the study. An abstract of study results was presented in March 2024 at the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes conference in Florence, Italy and at the Swiss Society of Paediatrics annual meeting in June 2024 in Lucerne, Switzerland. Data availability: De-identified subject level dataset will be made available on a case-by-case basis on reasonable request to the corresponding author for research purposes 6 months after publication. Funding: Open access funding provided by University of Bern. The study was supported by the Swiss Diabetes Foundation and by a YTCR grant from the Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation and the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. Dexcom and Ypsomed provided product support. Authors’ relationships and activities: CIL received a travel grant from the Swiss Society of Endocrinology and Diabetology to present the present work at the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes conference in Florence, Italy (Abstract no. 181). KB-K has received research funding from Dexcom, Embecta, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly, as well as honoraria from Tandem, Dexcom, Sanofi and Roche. MEW reports patents related to closed-loop (US9402953B2, US9579456B2), and being a consultant at CamDiab. RH reports having received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly, Dexcom and Novo Nordisk, receiving license fees from BBraun, patents related to closed-loop, and being a director at CamDiab. LB reports having received speaker and advisory board honoraria from Eli Lilly, Dexcom, Novo Nordisk, Ypsomed, Roche, Sanofi and Oviva. Contribution statement: CIL, CP, FN, NS, KB-K, LK, DH, DK and LB were involved in the conception, design and conduct of the study and the analysis and interpretation of the results. CIL, CP, FN, NS, LK, KB-K, TZ, DH, DK and LB were involved in the conception of the study and data acquisition. DH, CTN, CIL, KB-K, MEW, RH and LB were involved in the analysis and interpretation of the results. CIL, DH and LB wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors edited, reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript. CIL, DH, DK and LB are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF