Search

Aims: The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently defined cardiovascular risk classes for subjects with diabetes. Aim of this study was to explore the distribution of subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D) by cardiovascular risk groups according to the ESC classification and to describe the quality indicators of care., Methods: The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 Italian diabetes centers participating in the AMD (Associazione Medici Diabetologi) Annals initiative. Patients with T1D were stratified by cardiovascular risk. Measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment, and overall quality of care were evaluated., Results: Overall, 29.368 subjects with type 1 diabetes (64.7% at very high cardiovascular risk, 28.5% at high risk and 6.8% at moderate risk) were evaluated. A lack of use of drugs in case of high values and an inadequate control despite the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment was recognized. The overall quality of care tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular risk increased., Conclusion: A large proportion of subjects with T1D is at high or very high risk. Antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment seem not adequately used. Several actions are necessary to improve the quality of care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: An observational retrospective study was conducted by 2 diabetes clinics in Italy to assess patterns of use and long-term effectiveness of liraglutide on established and emerging parameters., Methods: Data from 261 patients with type 2 diabetes who started treatment with liraglutide between 2010 and 2014 were collected. Hierarchical linear regression models were applied to assess trends over time of clinical parameters. Factors associated with higher likelihood of dropout were identified through multivariate logistic analysis., Findings: Liraglutide was initiated as a switch in 42.5% of patients and as an add-on in 49.8%; in 7.7% of the patients initiation of liraglutide was associated with a reduction in the number of pharmacologic agents. A statistically significant reduction after 36 months was found for the following parameters (mean change [95% CIs]): glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ; -1.01% [1.34% to -0.68%]), fasting blood glucose (-27.5 [-40.6 to -14.4] mg/dL), weight (-2.9 [-4.5 to -1.3] kg), body mass index (-1.13 [-1.76 to -0.50] kg/m 2 ), waist circumference (-1.74 [-3.85 to -0.37] cm), and LDL-C (-24.7 [-36.67 to -12.8] mg/dL). Improvements in systolic (-3.5 mm Hg) and diastolic (-2.3 mm Hg) blood pressures were observed at 24 months. Albuminuria was reduced by -16.6 mg/L during 36 months, although statistical significance was not reached. Glomerular filtration rate and heart rate were unchanged. Reductions in HbA 1c between -0.6% and -1.3% were obtained in specific subgroups. Treatment was effective also in patients with >20 years of diabetes duration, although the likelihood of dropout was 6% higher for each additional year of disease duration (RR = 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12). The likelihood of dropout was almost four times higher for subjects treated with insulin (RR = 3.82; 95% CI, 1.22-11.96) and more than twice for those treated with sulfonylureas (RR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.16-4.94) compared with patients not treated with these agents., Implications: Liraglutide used in routine clinical conditions maintains its effectiveness on metabolic control and weight after 3 years. Improvements in terms of metabolic control were found when liraglutide was used as both switch and add-on treatment. In addition, improvements were sustained when liraglutide replaced sulfonylureas or insulin. Diabetes duration had no impact on drug efficacy. Long-term benefits relative to blood pressure and LDL-C were also found, which could not be entirely explained by antihypertensive/lipid-lowering treatment intensification. No major effect on renal parameters was documented. Diabetes duration and some concomitant treatments were associated with a higher likelihood of liraglutide discontinuation. These data can contribute to improve appropriateness and cost-effectiveness profile of liraglutide., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the quality of type 2 diabetes care according to sex., Research Design and Methods: Clinical data collected during the year 2009 were extracted from electronic medical records; quality-of-care indicators were evaluated. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate the likelihood of women versus men to be monitored for selected parameters, to reach clinical outcomes, and to be treated with specific classes of drugs. The intercenter variability in the proportion of men and women achieving the targets was also investigated., Results: Overall, 415,294 patients from 236 diabetes outpatient centers were evaluated, of whom 188,125 (45.3%) were women and 227,169 (54.7%) were men. Women were 14% more likely than men to have HbA1c>9.0% in spite of insulin treatment (odds ratio 1.14 [95% CI 1.10-1.17]), 42% more likely to have LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)≥130 mg/dL (1.42 [1.38-1.46]) in spite of lipid-lowering treatment, and 50% more likely to have BMI≥30 kg/m2 (1.50 [1.50-1.54]). Women were less likely to be monitored for foot and eye complications. In 99% of centers, the percentage of men reaching the LDL-C target was higher than in women, the proportion of patients reaching the HbA1c target was in favor of men in 80% of the centers, and no differences emerged for blood pressure., Conclusions: Women show a poorer quality of diabetes care than men. The attainment of the LDL-C target seems to be mainly related to pathophysiological factors, whereas patient and physician attitudes can play an important role in other process measures and outcomes.