Search

Purpose: Chest wall resections for lung cancer treatment remain difficult to plan using standard 2-dimensional computed tomography. Although virtual reality headsets have been used in many medical contexts, they have not been used in chest wall resection planning., Description: We compared preoperative planning of a chest wall surgical resection for lung cancer treatment between senior and resident surgeons who used an immersive virtual reality device and a 2-dimensional computed tomography., Evaluation: Chest wall resection planning was more accurate when surgeons used virtual reality vs computed tomography analysis (28.6% vs 18.3%, P = .018), and this was particularly true in the resident surgeon group (27.4% vs 8.3%, P = .0025). Predictions regarding the need for chest wall substitutes were also more accurate when they were made using virtual reality vs computed tomography analysis in all groups (96% vs 68.5%, P < .0001). Other studied parameters were not affected by the use of the virtual reality tool., Conclusions: Virtual reality may offer enhanced accuracy for chest wall resection and reconstruction planning for lung cancer treatment., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The association of unstable heart disease and resectable lung cancer is rare. The impacts of staged management, cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) versus angioplasty, on long-term survival and cancer recurrence remain debated. We report our experience using staged management., Methods: From 1997 to 2016, 107 patients were treated at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute: 72 underwent cardiac surgery with CPB (group 1), 35 were treated with angioplasty (group 2), followed by oncological pulmonary resection., Results: Two postoperative deaths (3%) and 1 ischaemic heart complication (1%) were reported in group 1. One death (3%) was reported in group 2. Two-year overall survival was 82% (59/72) in group 1 and 80% (28/35) in group 2; 5-year overall survival was 62% (33/53) in group 1 and 63% (19/30) in group 2. Two-year disease-free survival in group 1 was 79% (57/72) and 77% (27/35) in group 2; 5-year disease-free survival was 58% (31/53) in group 1 and 60% (18/30) in group 2. The independent risk factors for death after thoracic surgery were transfusions (P = 0.004) and grade ≥3 complications (P = 0.034). Independent risk factors for recurrence included the cancer stage (P < 0.001) and, paradoxically, a shorter delay between cardiac and lung procedures (P = 0.031)., Conclusions: When a staged management remains feasible after cardiac procedure, oncological outcomes of patients with cardiopathy and lung cancer are satisfactory. CPB does not seem to be deleterious. The delay between procedures should intuitively be as small as possible but not at the expense of good recovery after the cardiac procedure., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: After its destruction during refractory deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), current sternum reconstructions mainly rely on muscle flaps technique, but such technique have pitfalls and limits. To tackle the limited possibilities to use device implantation because of the risk of infection, we developed a self-protected device allowing its implantation in an infected area., Methods: We used gentamicin alone or in combination with vancomycin loaded in a porous ceramic sternum to replace sternums destroyed during DSWI. The aim was to mechanically replace the sternum and to secure the implantation by killing the remaining bacteria in the wound thanks to the loaded antibiotic., Results: This device was implanted in four infected patients during DWSI with sternal dehiscence. No complication occurred during surgeries, and wound healing was obtained quickly. Local antibiotic concentrations largely exceeded the ones needed for their efficacy while no antibiotic was found in the blood. All patients are well-being. However previously unknown gentamicin resistant bacteria, present in the surgical wound at the time of positioning, required sternal implant removal for one patient after 19 months. For all patients, pulmonary function tests (PFT) improved after implantation., Conclusions: The ceramic sternum played its role consolidating the thoracic cage without stiffening. The antibiotic loaded in the sternum allowed a secure implantation, killing bacteria before the colonization of the implant even in this infected area. These four implantations are promising for patients with sternal destruction after DSWI., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: F Bertin, E Denes, S El Balkhi: member of the scientific committee of I.Ceram; E Denes: Share holder of I.Ceram. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

A 68-year-old man presented with destruction of his sternum after cardiac surgery. Classical management with multiple debridements, vacuum dressings and antibiotics failed. A replacement of his sternum was performed using an antibiotic-loaded porous alumina ceramic sternum. Despite the infected wound, the ceramic sternum did not get infected due to the high antibiotic concentration obtained locally. Two years after the surgery, no relapse occurred and the pulmonary function tests improved., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)