Search

Purpose of Review: Among patients with kidney failure, home dialysis modalities, including peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) provide several individual and healthcare system benefits over in-center hemodialysis (HD). Infection remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in this population, and a core outcome of critical importance to patients, caregivers, and kidney health professionals. This narrative review provides evidence-based measures for infection prevention among individuals receiving home dialysis, with a particular emphasis on dialysis and access-related infections., Recent Findings: Patient and care partner education and training is an important and major theme for infection prevention in home dialysis. In PD, identifying and managing modifiable risk factors for infections such as hypokalemia, constipation, use of gastric acid suppressants, and domestic pets, along with the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis, when indicated, can substantially reduce peritonitis risk. Reducing the use of central venous catheters (CVC), and duration of CVC dependence is the most effective means of prevention of HD access-related bloodstream infections in individuals receiving HHD. For arteriovenous fistula cannulation, rope ladder technique is associated with lower risk of infection compared to buttonhole cannulation., Summary: Developing and instituting a well structured and evidence-based patient training and education program within home dialysis units is the most important measure in preventing and reducing dialysis and access-related infections. Kidney care providers should be familiar with different infection risk factors among individuals receiving home dialysis., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nocturnal hemodialysis (nHD) restores the attenuated brachial artery vasodilator responsiveness of patients receiving conventional intermittent hemodialysis (iHD). Its impact on coronary vasodilatation is unknown., Methods: We evaluated 25 patients on hemodialysis who fulfilled transplant criteria: 15 on iHD (4-hour sessions, 3 d/wk) and 10 on nHD (≈40 h/wk over 8-10-hour sessions) plus 6 control participants. Following diagnostic angiography, left anterior descending (LAD) coronary flow reserve and mean luminal diameter were quantified at baseline and during sequential intracoronary administration of adenosine (infusion and bolus), nitroglycerin (bolus), acetylcholine (infusion), acetylcholine coinfused with vitamin C, and, finally, sublingual nitroglycerin., Results: Coronary flow reserve in those receiving nHD was augmented relative to iHD (3.28±0.26 versus 2.17±0.12 [mean±SEM]; P <0.03) but attenuated, relative to controls (4.80±0.63; P =0.011). Luminal dilatations induced by intracoronary adenosine and nitroglycerin were similar in nHD and controls but blunted in the iHD cohort ( P <0.05 versus both). ACh elicited vasodilatation in controls but constriction in both dialysis groups (both P <0.05, versus control); vitamin C coinfusion had no effect. Sublingual nitroglycerin increased mid-left anterior descending diameter and reduced mean arterial pressure in controls (+15.2±2.68%; -16.00±1.60%) and in nHD recipients (+14.78±5.46%; -15.82±1.32%); iHD responses were markedly attenuated (+1.9±0.86%; -5.89±1.41%; P <0.05, all comparisons)., Conclusions: Coronary and systemic vasodilator responsiveness to both adenosine and nitroglycerin is augmented in patients receiving nHD relative to those receiving iHD, whereas vasoconstrictor responsiveness to acetylcholine does not differ. By improving coronary conduit and microvascular function, nHD may reduce the cardiovascular risk of patients on dialysis., Competing Interests: None.

Purpose: The benefits of intraoperative dialysis during orthotopic liver transplantation remain controversial. In patients with anuric renal failure and portopulmonary hypertension, maintaining venous return during caval clamping and unclamping along with minimizing fluid overload is critical to avoiding right ventricular strain and failure., Clinical Features: We present the case of a 54-yr-old female who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver disease with acute decompensation including severe hepatorenal syndrome (anuric requiring dialysis), probable hepatopulmonary syndrome, moderate pulmonary hypertension (right ventricular systolic pressure, 44 mm Hg), hepatic encephalopathy (grade 2), and esophageal varices. Prior to incision, pulmonary arterial pressures were 48/28 (mean, 35) mm Hg with a central venous pressure of 30 mm Hg, cardiac output of 7.4 L·min -1 , and pulmonary vascular resistance of 98 dynes·sec·cm -5 . In the context of right ventricular strain and volume overload observed on transthoracic echocardiography, we inserted an additional dialysis catheter into the right femoral vein. We initiated dialysis using the two catheters as a circuit (femoral line to the dialysis machine; blood was reinjected via the subclavian line) acting as a limited venovenous bypass, allowing right ventricular offloading and hemodialysis throughout the case. We removed 4.5 L via hemodialysis during the surgery, while avoiding acidosis, hyperkalemia, and sodium shifts. The patient tolerated reperfusion adequately despite pre-existing right ventricular dilation and dysfunction., Conclusion: We report on the use two hemodialysis catheters in a patient undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation as a circuit for simultaneous anuric hepatorenal syndrome and moderate pulmonary hypertension with right ventricular dilation and dysfunction. We believe this technique was instrumental in the patient's successful transplant., (© 2024. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society.)

There is a global interest in expanding home dialysis utilization among patients with ESKD. Home hemodialysis (HHD) is an appealing KRT option for this population because of its multiple clinical and quality of life benefits. Central to successful HHD is the establishment and maintenance of a functioning vascular access that serves as a patient's lifeline while on therapy. While the selection of a vascular access type is influenced by individual patient circumstances, the arteriovenous fistula is generally the preferred access method. Training patients to use their dialysis access requires attention to safety, risk management, and monitoring for complications to minimize adverse events and technique failure. Policies incorporating systematic frameworks for quality improvement and assurance, in conjunction with the measurement of metrics relating to vascular access, are tools that should be used by HHD programs to enhance the value of care delivered. In this perspective, we aim to describe what is currently known about the various vascular access options in HHD and to elucidate what needs to be taken into consideration in the selection and care of this access., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Introduction: Many individuals start dialysis in an acute setting with suboptimal pre-dialysis education. These individuals are often treated with central venous catheter insertion and initiation of in-center hemodialysis and only a minority will transfer to a home-based therapy. The dialysis start unit is a program performing in-center hemodialysis in a separate space while providing support and education on chronic kidney disease and treatment options in the initial weeks of kidney replacement therapy. We aimed to assess the uptake of home dialysis therapies between 2013 and 2021 among patients who started acute inpatient hemodialysis at University Health Network, Toronto and underwent dialysis at the dialysis start unit., Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study based on prospectively collected data. Patients' demographics were obtained from electronic charts. In the dialysis start unit, all patients received dialysis modality education by a nurse educator, dedicated home dialysis nurses, and the allied health care team., Findings: During 2013-2021, 122 patients were dialyzed in the dialysis start unit and included in the study. Among those patients, 68 patients ultimately chose home dialysis (57 peritoneal dialysis and 11 home hemodialysis). Fifty-four patients continued in-center hemodialysis. Patients adopting home dialysis were less likely to have diabetes and hypertension as the etiology of kidney failure and more likely to have glomerulonephritis or vasculitis., Discussion: Dialysis modality education is implementable in advanced chronic kidney disease. Individualized education and care after unplanned start dialysis can potentially enhance home dialysis choice and utilization., (© 2024 International Society for Hemodialysis.)

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) are the two home dialysis modalities offered to patients. They promote patient autonomy, enhance independence, and are generally associated with better quality of life compared to facility hemodialysis. PD offers some advantages (enhanced flexibility, ability to travel, preservation of residual kidney function, and vascular access sites) but few patients remain on PD indefinitely due to peritonitis and other complications. By contrast, HHD incurs longer and more intensive training combined with increased upfront health costs compared to PD, but is easier to sustain in the long term. As a result, the integrated home dialysis model was proposed to combine the advantages of both home-based dialysis modalities. In this paradigm, patients are encouraged to initiate dialysis on PD and transfer to HHD after PD termination. Available evidence demonstrates the feasibility and safety of this approach and some observational studies have shown that patients who undergo the PD-to-HHD transition have clinical outcomes comparable to patients who initiate dialysis directly on HHD. Nevertheless, the prevalence of PD-to-HHD transfers remains low, reflecting the multiple barriers that prevent the full uptake of home-to-home transitions, notably a lack of awareness about the model, home-care "burnout," clinical inertia after a transfer to facility HD, suboptimal integration of PD and HHD centers, and insufficient funding for home dialysis programs. In this review, we will examine the conceptual advantages and disadvantages of integrated home dialysis, present the evidence that underlies it, identify challenges that prevent its success and finally, propose solutions to increase its adoption., Competing Interests: A.C.N.F. received speaker honoraria by Baxter Healthcare and holds a FRQS scholarship. J.B. serves as consultant to and received speaker honoraria with both DaVita Healthcare Partners and Baxter Healthcare. C.C. holds the R Fraser Elliott Chair in Home Dialysis and serves as consultant to Medtronic, Quanta, and Dialco Inc. He received an investigator—initiated grant from Medtronic ERP program. He also serves as the President of the International Society for Hemodialysis. L.C.D. has no disclosures relevant to the current submission., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Rationale & Objective: The integrated home dialysis model proposes the initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and a timely transition to home hemodialysis (HHD) after PD ends. We compared the outcomes of patients transitioning from PD to HHD with those initiating KRT with HHD., Study Design: Observational analysis of the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR)., Settings & Participants: All patients who initiated PD or HHD within the first 90 days of KRT between 2005 and 2018., Exposure: Patients transitioning from PD to HHD (PD+HHD group) versus patients initiating KRT with HHD (HHD group)., Outcome: (1) A composite of all-cause mortality and modality transfer (to in-center hemodialysis or PD for 90 days) and (2) all hospitalizations (considered as recurrent events)., Analytical Approach: A propensity score analysis for which PD+HHD patients were matched 1:1 to (1) incident HHD patients ("incident-match" analysis) or (2) HHD patients with a KRT vintage at least equivalent to the vintage of PD+HHD patients at the transition time ("vintage-matched" analysis). Cause-specific hazards models (composite outcome) and shared frailty models (hospitalization) were used to compare groups., Results: Among 63,327 individuals in the CORR, 163 PD+HHD patients (median of 1.9 years in PD) and 711 HHD patients were identified. In the incident-match analysis, compared to the HHD patients, the PD+HHD group had a similar risk of the composite outcome (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.58-1.32]) and hospitalizations (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.76-1.41]). In the vintage-match analysis, PD+HHD patients had a lower hazard for the composite outcome (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40-0.94]) but a similar hospitalization risk (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.59-1.24])., Limitations: Risk of survivor bias in the PD+HHD cohort and residual confounding., Conclusions: Controlling for KRT vintage, the patients transitioning from PD to HHD had better clinical outcomes than the incident HHD patients. These data support the use of integrated home dialysis for patients initiating home-based KRT., Plain-Language Summary: The integrated home dialysis model proposes the initiation of dialysis with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and subsequent transition to home hemodialysis (HHD) once PD is no longer feasible. It allows patients to benefit from initial lifestyle advantages of PD and to continue home-based treatments after its termination. However, some patients may prefer to initiate dialysis with HHD from the outset. In this study, we compared the long-term clinical outcomes of both approaches using a large Canadian dialysis register. We found that both options led to a similar risk of hospitalization. In contrast, the PD-to-HHD model led to improved survival when controlling for the duration of kidney failure., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a lack of randomized controlled trial data regarding differences in immunogenicity of varying coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine regimens in CKD populations., Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial at three kidney centers in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, evaluating the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody response after third dose vaccination. Participants ( n =273) with CKD not on dialysis or receiving dialysis were randomized 1:1 to third dose 30- µ g BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or 100- µ g mRNA-1273 (Moderna). The primary outcome of this study was SARS-CoV-2 IgG-binding antibodies to the receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD). Spike protein (antispike), nucleocapsid protein, and vaccine reactogenicity were also evaluated. Serology was measured before third dose and 1, 3, and 6 months after third dose. A subset of participants ( n =100) were randomly selected to assess viral pseudovirus neutralization against wild-type D614G, B.1.617.2 (Delta), and B.1.1.529 (Omicron BA.1)., Results: Among 273 participants randomized, 94% were receiving maintenance dialysis and 59% received BNT162b2 for initial two dose COVID-19 vaccination. Third dose of mRNA-1273 was associated with higher mean anti-RBD levels (1871 binding antibody units [BAU]/ml; 95% confidence interval [CI], 829 to 2988) over a 6-month period in comparison with third dose BNT162b2 (1332 BAU/ml; 95% CI, 367 to 2402) with a difference of 539 BAU/ml (95% CI, 139 to 910; P = 0.009). Neither antispike levels nor neutralizing antibodies to wild-type, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 pseudoviruses were statistically different. COVID-19 infection occurred in 10% of participants: 15 (11%) receiving mRNA-1273 and 11 (8%) receiving BNT162b2. Third dose BNT162b2 was not associated with a significant different risk for COVID-19 in comparison with mRNA-1273 (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.27 to 2.2; P = 0.63)., Conclusions: In patients with CKD, third dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccination with mRNA-1273 elicited higher SARS-CoV-2 anti-RBD levels in comparison with BNT162b2 over a 6-month period., Clinical Trial Registry Name and Registration Number: COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters in Patients With CKD (BOOST KIDNEY), NCT05022329 ., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Nephrology.)

Globally, there is an interest to increase home dialysis utilization. The most recent United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data report that 13.3% of incident dialysis patients in the United States are started on home dialysis, while most patients continue to initiate KRT with in-center hemodialysis. To effect meaningful change, a multifaceted innovative approach will be needed to substantially increase the use of home dialysis. Patient and provider education is the first step to enhance home dialysis knowledge awareness. Ideally, one should maximize the number of patients with CKD stage 5 transitioning to home therapies. If this is not possible, infrastructures including transitional dialysis units and community dialysis houses may help patients increase self-care efficacy and eventually transition care to home. From a policy perspective, adopting a home dialysis preference mandate and providing financial support to recuperate increased costs for patients and providers have led to higher uptake in home dialysis. Finally, respite care and planned home-to-home transitions can reduce the incidence of transitioning to in-center hemodialysis. We speculate that an ecosystem of complementary system innovations is needed to cause a sufficient change in patient and provider behavior, which will ultimately modify overall home dialysis utilization., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

The COVID-19 pandemic has mandated a re-imagination of how healthcare is administered and delivered, with a view towards focusing on person-centred care and advancing population health while increasing capacity, access and equity in the healthcare system. These goals can be achieved through healthcare integration. In 2019, the University Health Network (UHN), a consortium of four quaternary care hospitals in Ontario, Canada, established the first stage of a pilot program to increase healthcare integration at the institutional level and vertically with other primary, secondary and tertiary institutions in the Ontario healthcare system. Implementation of the program was accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic and demonstrated how healthcare integration improves person-centred care and population health; therefore serving as the foundation for a health system response for the COVID-19 pandemic recovery and beyond., Competing Interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s).)

Neutralization of Omicron subvariants by different bivalent vaccines has not been well evaluated. This study characterizes neutralization against Omicron subvariants in 98 individuals on dialysis or with a kidney transplant receiving the BNT162b2 (BA.4/BA.5) or mRNA-1273 (BA.1) bivalent COVID-19 vaccine. Neutralization against Omicron BA.1, BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 increased by 8-fold one month following bivalent vaccination. In comparison to wild-type (D614G), neutralizing antibodies against Omicron-specific variants were 7.3-fold lower against BA.1, 8.3-fold lower against BA.5, 45.8-fold lower against BQ.1.1, and 48.2-fold lower against XBB.1.5. Viral neutralization was not significantly different by bivalent vaccine type for wild-type (D614G) (P = 0.48), BA.1 (P = 0.21), BA.5 (P = 0.07), BQ.1.1 (P = 0.10), nor XBB.1.5 (P = 0.10). Hybrid immunity conferred higher neutralizing antibodies against all Omicron subvariants. This study provides evidence that BNT162b2 (BA.4/BA.5) and mRNA-1273 (BA.1) induce similar neutralization against Omicron subvariants, even when antigenically divergent from the circulating variant., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: More frequent and/or longer hemodialysis (HD) has been associated with improvements in numerous clinical outcomes in patients on dialysis. Home HD (HHD), which allows more frequent and/or longer dialysis with lower cost and flexibility in treatment planning, is not widely used worldwide. Although, retrospective studies have indicated better survival with HHD, this issue remains controversial. In this multicenter study, we compared thrice-weekly extended HHD with in-center conventional HD (ICHD) in a large patient population with a long-term follow-up., Methods: We matched 349 patients starting HHD between 2010 and 2014 with 1047 concurrent patients on ICHD by using propensity scores. Patients were followed-up with from their respective baseline until September 30, 2018. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were technique survival; hospitalization; and changes in clinical, laboratory, and medication parameters., Results: The mean duration of dialysis session was 418 ± 54 minutes in HHD and 242 ± 10 minutes in patients on ICHD. All-cause mortality rate was 3.76 and 6.27 per 100 patient-years in the HHD and the ICHD groups, respectively. In the intention-to-treat analysis, HHD was associated with a 40% lower risk for all-cause mortality than ICHD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.80; P  < 0.001). In HHD, the 5-year technical survival was 86.5%. HHD treatment provided better phosphate and blood pressure (BP) control, improvements in nutrition and inflammation, and reduction in hospitalization days and medication requirement., Conclusion: These results indicate that extended HHD is associated with higher survival and better outcomes compared to ICHD., (© 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Glial cells and central nervous system (CNS)-infiltrating leukocytes contribute to multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the networks that govern crosstalk among these ontologically distinct populations remain unclear. Here, we show that, in mice and humans, CNS-resident astrocytes and infiltrating CD44 hi CD4 + T cells generated interleukin-3 (IL-3), while microglia and recruited myeloid cells expressed interleukin-3 receptor-ɑ (IL-3Rɑ). Astrocytic and T cell IL-3 elicited an immune migratory and chemotactic program by IL-3Rɑ + myeloid cells that enhanced CNS immune cell infiltration, exacerbating MS and its preclinical model. Multiregional snRNA-seq of human CNS tissue revealed the appearance of IL3RA-expressing myeloid cells with chemotactic programming in MS plaques. IL3RA expression by plaque myeloid cells and IL-3 amount in the cerebrospinal fluid predicted myeloid and T cell abundance in the CNS and correlated with MS severity. Our findings establish IL-3:IL-3RA as a glial-peripheral immune network that prompts immune cell recruitment to the CNS and worsens MS., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests B.P.K. is an inventor on patents and/or patent applications filed by Mass General Brigham that describe genome engineering technologies. B.P.K. is a consultant for EcoR1 capital and is an advisor to Acrigen Biosciences, Life Edit Therapeutics, and Prime Medicine., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Home hemodialysis (HHD) offers several clinical, quality of life and cost-saving benefits for patients with end-stage kidney disease. While uptake of this modality has increased in recent years, its prevalence remains low and high rates of discontinuation remain a challenge. This comprehensive narrative review aims to better understand what is currently known about technique survival in HHD patients, elucidate the clinical factors that contribute to attrition and expand on possible strategies to prevent discontinuation. With increasing efforts to encourage home modalities, it is imperative to better understand technique survival and find strategies to help maintain patients on the home therapy of their choosing. It is crucial to better target high-risk patients, examine ideal training practices and identify practices that are potentially modifiable to improve technique survival., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Rationale and Objective: Frailty is common among people with kidney failure treated with hemodialysis (HD). The objective was to describe how frailty evolves over time in people treated by HD, how improvements in frailty and frailty markers are associate with clinical outcomes, and the characteristics that are associated with improvement in frailty., Study Design: Prospective cohort study., Setting and Participants: Adults initiating thrice weekly in-center HD in Canada., Exposure: We classified frailty using a 5-point score (3 or more indicates frailty) based on physical inactivity, slowness or weakness, poor endurance or exhaustion, and malnutrition. We categorized the frailty trajectory as never present, improving, deteriorating, and always present., Outcomes: All-cause death, hospitalizations, and placement into long-term care., Analytical Approach: We examined the association between time-varying frailty measures and these outcomes using Cox and negative binomial models, after adjustment for potential confounders., Results: 985 participants were included and followed up for a median of 33 months; 507 (51%) died, 761 (77%) experienced ≥1 hospitalization and 115 (12%) entered long-term care. Overall, 760 (77%) reported frailty during follow-up. Three-quarters (78%) of those with frailty at baseline remained frail throughout the follow-up, 46% without baseline frailty became frail, and 23% with baseline frailty became nonfrail. Higher frailty scores were associated with an increased risk of mortality (fully adjusted HR, 1.58 per unit; 95% CI, 1.39-1.80) and an increased rate of hospitalization (RR, 1.16 per unit; 95% CI, 1.09-1.23). Compared with those who were frail throughout the follow-up, participants with frailty at baseline but improving during follow-up showed a lower mortality (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.81), and a lower rate of hospitalization (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87)., Limitations: There was missing data on frailty at baseline and during follow-up., Conclusions: Frailty was associated with a higher risk of poor outcomes compared with those without frailty, and participants whose status improved from frail to nonfrail showed better clinical outcomes than those who remained frail. These findings emphasize the importance of identifying and implementing effective treatments for frailty in patients receiving maintenance HD., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Home dialysis modalities (home hemodialysis [HD] and peritoneal dialysis [PD]) are associated with greater patient autonomy and treatment satisfaction compared with in-center modalities, yet the level of home-dialysis use worldwide is low. Reasons for limited utilization are context-dependent, informed by local resources, dialysis costs, access to healthcare, health system policies, provider bias or preferences, cultural beliefs, individual lifestyle concerns, potential care-partner time, and financial burdens. In May 2021, KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) convened a controversies conference on home dialysis, focusing on how modality choice and distribution are determined and strategies to expand home-dialysis use. Participants recognized that expanding use of home dialysis within a given health system requires alignment of policy, fiscal resources, organizational structure, provider incentives, and accountability. Clinical outcomes across all dialysis modalities are largely similar, but for specific clinical measures, one modality may have advantages over another. Therefore, choice among available modalities is preference-sensitive, with consideration of quality of life, life goals, clinical characteristics, family or care-partner support, and living environment. Ideally, individuals, their care-partners, and their healthcare teams will employ shared decision-making in assessing initial and subsequent kidney failure treatment options. To meet this goal, iterative, high-quality education and support for healthcare professionals, patients, and care-partners are priorities. Everyone who faces dialysis should have access to home therapy. Facilitating universal access to home dialysis and expanding utilization requires alignment of policy considerations and resources at the dialysis-center level, with clear leadership from informed and motivated clinical teams., (Copyright © 2023 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objective: Amyloidoses are a heterogeneous group of disorders resulting from deposition of amyloid fibrils into extracellular tissues. While the kidneys are one of the most frequent sites of amyloid deposition, amyloid deposits can also affect a wide range of organ systems, including the heart, liver, gastrointestinal tract, and peripheral nerves. The prognosis of amyloidosis, especially with cardiac involvement, remains poor; however, a collaborative approach applying new tools for diagnosis and management may improve outcomes. In September 2021, the Canadian Onco-Nephrology Interest Group hosted a symposium to discuss diagnostic challenges and recent advances in the management of amyloidosis from the perspectives of the nephrologist, cardiologist, and onco-hematologist., Methods and Sources of Information: Through structured presentations, the group discussed a series of cases highlighting the varied clinical presentations of amyloidoses affecting the kidney and heart. Expert opinions, clinical trial findings, and publication summaries were used to illustrate patient-related and treatment-related considerations in the diagnosis and management of amyloidoses., Key Findings: (1) Overview of the clinical presentation of amyloidoses and the role of specialists in performing timely and accurate diagnostic workup; (2) review of best practices for multidisciplinary management of amyloidosis, including prognostic variables and determinants of treatment response; and (3) update on new and emerging treatments in the management of light chain and amyloid transthyretin amyloidoses., Limitations: This conference featured multidisciplinary discussion of cases, and learning points reflect the assessments by the involved experts/authors., Implications: Identification and management of amyloidoses can be facilitated with a multidisciplinary approach and higher index of suspicion from cardiologists, nephrologists, and hemato-oncologists. Increased awareness of clinical presentations and diagnostic algorithms for amyloidosis subtyping will lead to more timely interventions and improved clinical outcomes., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Abhijat Kitchlu: No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Christopher T. Chan: No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Kenar D. Jhaveri: Consultancy agreements with Secretome, George Clinicals, PMV pharmaceuticals, GSK, and Calliditas. K.D.J. reports honoraria from the American Society of Nephrology and UpToDate.com; reports serving on the editorial boards of American Journal of Kidney Diseases, CJASN, Clinical Kidney Journal, Journal of Onconephrology, Kidney International, and Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation; reports serving as Editor-in-Chief of ASN Kidney News and section editor for onconephrology for Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. Diego Delgado: Consulting fees and speakers’ honoraria from Akcea, Alnylam, Pfizer. Paul Tam: No relevant conflicts of interest to disclose, (© The Author(s) 2023.)

Diet profoundly influences physiology. Whereas over-nutrition elevates risk for disease via its influence on immunity and metabolism, caloric restriction and fasting appear to be salutogenic. Despite multiple correlations observed between diet and health, the underlying biology remains unclear. Here, we identified a fasting-induced switch in leukocyte migration that prolongs monocyte lifespan and alters susceptibility to disease in mice. We show that fasting during the active phase induced the rapid return of monocytes from the blood to the bone marrow. Monocyte re-entry was orchestrated by hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis-dependent release of corticosterone, which augmented the CXCR4 chemokine receptor. Although the marrow is a safe haven for monocytes during nutrient scarcity, re-feeding prompted mobilization culminating in monocytosis of chronologically older and transcriptionally distinct monocytes. These shifts altered response to infection. Our study shows that diet-in particular, a diet's temporal dynamic balance-modulates monocyte lifespan with consequences for adaptation to external stressors., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.N. has received funding or material research support from Alnylam, Biotronik, CSL Behring, GlycoMimetics, GSK, Medtronic, Novartis, and Pfizer as well as consulting fees from Lilly, Biogen, Gimv, IFM Therapeutics, Molecular Imaging, Sigilon, and Verseau Therapeutics. F.K.S. has received funds or material research support from Novartis, Partner Therapeutics, Pfizer, and Verseau Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: People living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been disproportionately affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, including higher rates of infection, hospitalization, and death. Data on responsiveness to COVID-19 vaccination strategies and immunogenicity are limited, yet required to inform vaccination strategies in this at-risk population., Objective: The objective of this study is to characterize the longitudinal serologic response to COVID-19 vaccination., Design: This is a prospective observational cohort study., Setting: Participating outpatient kidney programs within Ontario and British Columbia., Patients: Up to 2500 participants with CKD G3b-5D receiving COVID-19 vaccination, including participants receiving dialysis and kidney transplant recipients (CKD G1T-5T)., Measurements: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibodies (anti-spike, anti-receptor binding domain, anti-nucleocapsid) will be detected by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) from serum or dried blood spot testing. In a subset of participants, neutralizing antibodies against novel variants of concern will be evaluated. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be collected for exploratory immune profiling of SARS-CoV-2 specific cellular immunity., Methods: Participants will be recruited prior to or following any COVID-19 vaccine dose and have blood sampled for serological testing at multiple timepoints: 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post vaccination. When possible, samples will be collected prior to a dose or booster. Participants will remain in the study for at least 1 year following their last COVID-19 vaccine dose., Strengths and Limitations: The adaptive design of this study allows for planned modification based on emerging evidence or rapid changes in public health policy surrounding vaccination. Limitations include incomplete earlier timepoints for blood collection due to rapid vaccination of the population., Conclusions: This large multicenter serologic study of participants living with kidney disease will generate data on the kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 immune response to vaccination across the spectrum of CKD, providing insights into the amplitude and duration of immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccination and allowing for characterization of factors associated with immune response. The results of this study may be used to inform immunization guidelines and public health recommendations for the 4 million Canadians living with CKD., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Kevin Yau has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca. Adeera Levin reports being a scientific advisor to, or member of, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Certa, Chinook Therapeutics, Johnson and Johnson, Kidney Foundation of Canada, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Otsuka, Reata, Retrophin, and The George Institute; receiving research funding from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Canadian Institute of Health Research, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Kidney Foundation of Canada, Merck, NIDDK, NIH, Ortho Biotech, Otsuka, and Oxford Clinical Trials; and having consultancy agreements with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Johnson and Johnson/Jansen, Reata, and Retrophin. Marc Romney has received research support from Public Health Agency of Canada and the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force. Jeffrey Perl reports receiving speaking honoraria and consultancy fees from Baxter Healthcare; grants from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant support; speaking honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care, AstraZeneca, Davita Healthcare, and US Renal Care; and consultancy fees from LiberDi Dialysis outside the submitted work. Shelly Bolotin reports funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Immunization Research Network, the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, and the Public Health Agency of Canada, outside the submitted work. She is a member of the Canadian Immunization Research Network Management Committee, COVID-19 Immunity Task Force Leadership Group. Vanessa Tran reports that Public Health Ontario received funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada and test kits from the Canadian Immunity Task Force for COVID-19 serosurveillance studies. Public Health Ontario is also involved in a COVID-19 mix-and-match vaccine clinical trial. Shelly Bolotin and Vanessa Tran are employees of Public Health Ontario. Anne-Claude Gingras has received research funds from a research contract with Providence Therapeutics Holdings, Inc, for other projects, participates in the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force (CITF) Immune Science and Testing working party, chairs the CIHR Institute of Genetics Advisory Board, and is a member of the SAB of the National Research Council of Canada Human Health Therapeutics Board. Matthew Oliver and Michelle Hladunewich are contracted Medical Leads at Ontario Renal Network, Ontario Health. Matthew Oliver is owner of Oliver Medical Management Inc., which licenses Dialysis Management Analysis and Reporting System software. He has received honoraria for speaking from Baxter Healthcare. Michelle Hladunewich reports receiving grants from Pfizer for a study in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; Ionis, Calliditas, and Chinook for studies in Immunoglobulin A nephropathy; and Roche for a preeclampsia study. No other competing interests were declared., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

A sleepless night may feel awful in its aftermath, but sleep's revitalizing powers are substantial, perpetuating the idea that convalescent sleep is a consequence-free physiological reset. Although recent studies have shown that catch-up sleep insufficiently neutralizes the negative effects of sleep debt, the mechanisms that control prolonged effects of sleep disruption are not understood. Here, we show that sleep interruption restructures the epigenome of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and increases their proliferation, thus reducing hematopoietic clonal diversity through accelerated genetic drift. Sleep fragmentation exerts a lasting influence on the HSPC epigenome, skewing commitment toward a myeloid fate and priming cells for exaggerated inflammatory bursts. Combining hematopoietic clonal tracking with mathematical modeling, we infer that sleep preserves clonal diversity by limiting neutral drift. In humans, sleep restriction alters the HSPC epigenome and activates hematopoiesis. These findings show that sleep slows decay of the hematopoietic system by calibrating the hematopoietic epigenome, constraining inflammatory output, and maintaining clonal diversity., (© 2022 McAlpine et al.)

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) first policy has been established in Hong Kong since 1985. After 35 years of practice, the PD first policy in Hong Kong has influenced many countries around the world including governments, health ministries, nephrologists and renal nurses on the overall health policy structure and clinical practice in treating kidney failure patients using PD as an important dialysis modality. In 2021, the International Association of Chinese Nephrologists and the Hong Kong Society of Nephrology jointly held a symposium celebrating the 35 years of PD first policy in Hong Kong. In that symposium, experts and opinion leaders from around the world have shared their perspectives on how the PD first policy has grown and how it has affected PD and home dialysis practice globally. The advantages of PD during COVID-19 pandemic were highlighted and the use of telemedicine as an important adjunct was discussed in treating kidney failure patients to improve the overall quality of care. Barriers to PD and the need for sustainability of PD first policy were also emphasized. Overall, the knowledge awareness of PD as a home dialysis for patients, families, care providers and learners is a prerequisite for the success of PD first. A critical mass of PD regional hubs is needed for training and mentorship. Importantly, the alignment of policy and clinical goals are enablers of PD first program., (© 2022 The Authors. Nephrology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Rationale & Objective: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be at increased risk for cancer. CKD may also be associated with worse cancer outcomes. This study examined cancer incidence and mortality across the spectrum of CKD., Study Design: Population-based cohort study., Setting & Participants: All adult Ontario residents with data on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or who were receiving maintenance dialysis or had received a kidney transplant (2007-2016)., Exposure: Patients were categorized as of the first date they had 2 eGFR assessments or were registered as receiving maintenance dialysis or having received a kidney transplant. eGFR levels were further categorized as ≥60, 45-59, 30-44, 15-29, and <15 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; the latter 4 groups are consistent with KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) CKD categories G3a, G3b, G4, and G5, respectively., Outcomes: Overall and site-specific cancer incidence and mortality., Analytical Approach: Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard models., Results: Among 5,882,388 individuals with eGFR data, 29,809 receiving dialysis, and 4,951 having received a kidney transplant, there were 325,895 cancer diagnoses made during 29,993,847 person-years of follow-up. The cumulative incidence of cancer ranged between 10.8% and 15.3% in patients with kidney disease. Compared with patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) for a cancer diagnosis among patients with CKD G3a, G3b, G4, and G5 were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.07-1.10), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.01), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.90), respectively. The AHRs for patients receiving dialysis and who had received a transplant were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.96-1.07) and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.12-1.39), respectively. Patients with kidney disease had higher proportions of stage 4 cancers at diagnosis. Patients with CKD G3a, G3b, and G4 and transplant recipients had increased risks of cancer-specific mortality (AHRs of 1.27 [95% CI, 1.23-1.32], 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24-1.35], 1.25 [95% CI, 1.18-1.33], and 1.48 [95% CI, 1.18-1.87], respectively). The risks of bladder and kidney cancers and multiple myeloma were particularly increased in CKD, and mortality from these malignancies increased with worsening kidney function., Limitations: Possible unmeasured confounding and limited ability to infer causal associations., Conclusions: Cancer incidence in the setting of kidney disease is substantial. Cancer risk was increased in mild to moderate CKD and among transplant recipients, but not in advanced kidney disease. Cancer-related mortality was significantly higher among patients with kidney disease, particularly urologic cancers and myeloma. Strategies to detect and manage these cancers in the CKD population are needed., (Copyright © 2022 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Currently, thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis for 3 to 5 hours per session is the most common therapy worldwide for patients with treated kidney failure. Outcomes with thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis are poor. Emerging evidence supports the overarching hypothesis that a more physiological approach to administering dialysis therapy, including in the home through home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, may lead to improvement in several cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular outcomes compared with thrice-weekly in-center hemodialysis. The Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative, which has a goal of increasing the use of home dialysis, is aligned with the American Heart Association's 2024 mission to champion a full and healthy life and health equity. We conclude that incorporation of interdisciplinary care models to increase the use of home dialysis therapies in an equitable manner will contribute to the ultimate goal of improving outcomes for patients with kidney failure and cardiovascular disease.

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) symptoms improve through self-care, for which adherence remains low among patients despite the provision of education for these behaviours by clinical teams. Open Access Digital Community Promoting Self-Care, Peer Support and Health Literacy (ODYSSEE-vCHAT) combines automated digital counselling with social network support to improve mortality and morbidity, engagement with self-care materials, and health-related quality of life., Methods and Analysis: Use of ODYSSEE-vCHAT via Internet-connected personal computer by 162 HF patients will be compared with a control condition over 22 months. The primary outcome is a composite index score of all-cause mortality, all-cause emergency department visits, and HF-related hospitalisation at trial completion. Secondary outcomes include individual components of the composite index, engagement with self-care materials, and patient-reported measures of physical and psychosocial well-being, disease management, health literacy, and substance use. Patients are recruited from tertiary care hospitals in Toronto, Canada and randomised on a 1:1 ratio to both arms of the trial. Online assessments occur at baseline (t=0), months 4, 8 and 12, and trial completion. Ordinal logistic regression analyses and generalised linear models will evaluate primary and secondary outcomes., Ethics and Dissemination: The trial has been approved by the research ethics boards at the University Health Network (20-5960), Sunnybrook Hospital (5117), and Mount Sinai Hospital (21-022-E). Informed consent of eligible patients occurs in person or online. Findings will be shared with key stakeholders and the public. Results will allow for the preparation of a Canada-wide phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of ODYSSEE-vCHAT in improving clinical outcomes and raising the standard of outpatient care., Trial Registration Number: NCT04966104., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Patients have varied learning styles and this has implications for home haemodialysis (HHD). Assessment tools directed toward understanding these styles remains understudied. As a consequence, this may lead to substandard retention rates or adverse events in HHD programs. As part of a continuous quality improvement initiative we have aimed to improve our understanding of patient learning styles and consequently tailor home dialysis training to individuals. To objectively determine knowledge translation and comprehension, irrespective of learning styles, we have introduced an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). This assessment tool allows for further refinement of educational priorities by highlighting both deficiencies and strengths. Thereafter, an exit OSCE ensures patients attain an acceptable standard to complete home haemodialysis independently. We hope this tool will help shape future training criteria for HHD programs and consequently reduce adverse event rates., (© 2022 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

The nervous and immune systems are intricately linked 1 . Although psychological stress is known to modulate immune function, mechanistic pathways linking stress networks in the brain to peripheral leukocytes remain poorly understood 2 . Here we show that distinct brain regions shape leukocyte distribution and function throughout the body during acute stress in mice. Using optogenetics and chemogenetics, we demonstrate that motor circuits induce rapid neutrophil mobilization from the bone marrow to peripheral tissues through skeletal-muscle-derived neutrophil-attracting chemokines. Conversely, the paraventricular hypothalamus controls monocyte and lymphocyte egress from secondary lymphoid organs and blood to the bone marrow through direct, cell-intrinsic glucocorticoid signalling. These stress-induced, counter-directional, population-wide leukocyte shifts are associated with altered disease susceptibility. On the one hand, acute stress changes innate immunity by reprogramming neutrophils and directing their recruitment to sites of injury. On the other hand, corticotropin-releasing hormone neuron-mediated leukocyte shifts protect against the acquisition of autoimmunity, but impair immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and influenza infection. Collectively, these data show that distinct brain regions differentially and rapidly tailor the leukocyte landscape during psychological stress, therefore calibrating the ability of the immune system to respond to physical threats., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Self-management has shown to improve the quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Readily accessible self-management tools are essential in promoting adherence to self-care behaviors. In recognizing that digital health facilitates efficient access to self-management programs, we developed a digital counseling program, ODYSSEE Kidney Health, to promote self-care behaviors while supporting health-related quality of life., Objective: To present the design and development of ODYSSEE Kidney Health for digital counseling for patients with CKD., Design: The study involved an iterative design process based on user-centered design principles to develop the digital counseling program, ODYSSEE Kidney Health., Setting: A sample of 10 to 15 participants were purposively sampled from nephrology clinics at the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada., Methods: Participants underwent 2 phases in the development process. In each phase, participants were presented with a component of the program, asked to perform goal-oriented tasks, and participate in the "think-aloud" process. Semi-structured interviews followed the first phase to identify feedback about the overall program. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified themes from the usability testing. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographic data., Results: We enrolled 11 participants (n = 7 males, n = 4 females, ages 30-82). The main themes generated anchored on (1) impact on nephrology care, (2) technical features, and (3) CKD content. Overall, participants reported positive satisfaction toward the navigation, layout, and content of the program. They cited the value of the program in their daily CKD care., Limitations: Study limitations included using a single center to recruit participants, most of the participants having prior technology use, and using one module as a representative of the entire digital platform., Conclusion: The acceptability of a digital counseling program for patients with CKD relies on taking the patients' perspective using a user-centered design process. It is vital in ensuring adoption and adherence to self-management interventions aimed at sustaining behavioral change., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Home dialysis (peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home haemodialysis (HHD)) are ideal options for kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Occasionally, because of technique failure, patients are required to transition out of home dialysis, and the most common option tends to be to in-centre HD. There are few published studies on home-to-home transition (PD to HHD or HHD to PD) and dynamics during the transition period. We present a retrospective review of 28 patients who transitioned from a home-to-home dialysis modality at our centre over a 24-year period. We observed a total of 911 home dialysis patients with technique failure (826 PD patients and 85 HHD patients) with only 28 patients (3% of the total with technique failure) having successful home-to-home transition. During the transition period, 11 patients (39%) were hospitalized and 13 patients (46%) required variable periods of in-centre HD. After a median follow-up of 48 months following dialysis modality transition, four patients switched to in-centre HD permanently (home dialysis technique survival of 86% censored for death and kidney transplantation) and four patients died resulting in a patient survival of 86% (censored for switch to in-centre HD and transplantation). In our centre, home-to-home transition is a feasible strategy with comparable patient and technique survival. A significant proportion of patients switching from a home-to-home dialysis modality required variable intervals of hospitalization and in-centre HD during transitions. Future efforts should be directed towards assessment and home dialysis education during the entire process of dialysis transition.

Background: Advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) have increased patient survival, although substantial treatment-related toxicity remains, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). We assessed the association between CKD and survival and transplant-specific outcomes in HSCT recipients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all 408 adult patients with allogenic HSCT at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, Canada, 2015-18). We used logistic regression to identify risk factors for CKD at 1 year post-transplant. Associations between CKD at 1 year and overall survival, relapse-free survival, graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD)-free/relapse-free survival, relapse and transplant-related mortality were examined using extended time-varying Cox models. In a sensitivity analysis, we restricted the cohort to survivors at 1 year, using standard Cox proportional hazard models to examine associations between CKD and overall survival, relapse-free survival and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival, and Fine and Gray's competing risk models to determine associations between CKD and relapse/transplant-related mortality., Results: The prevalence of CKD at 1 year was 19% (46 patients) with median follow-up of 23 months. Multivariable regression identified age at transplant [adjusted OR (aOR) 1.09, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.05-1.14; P < 0.0001), female gender (aOR 2.83, 95% CI = 1.34-5.97; P = 0.006) and acute kidney injury during the first 100 days (aOR 3.86, 95% CI = 1.70-8.73; P = 0.001) as risk factors for CKD at 1 year. Patients with CKD at 1 year had significantly poorer overall survival than those without CKD, when adjusted for relevant covariates [adjusted HR (aHR) 1.93, 95% CI = 1.02-3.66; P = 0.04 in the time-varying Cox model, and aHR 2.06, 95% CI = 1.04-4.07; P = 0.04 using the standard Cox model]. CKD at 1 year was also associated with worse GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (aHR 1.65, 95% CI = 1.04-2.61; P = 0.03)., Conclusions: CKD adversely affects the long-term prognosis for allogeneic HSCT recipients, with increased mortality risk and worse GVHD-free/relapse-free survival., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Introduction: Transition to hemodialysis (HD) is a common outcome in peritoneal dialysis (PD), but the associated mortality risk is poorly understood. This study sought to identify rates of and risk factors for mortality after transitioning from PD to HD., Methods: Patients with incident PD (between 2000 and 2014) who transferred to HD for ≥1 day were identified, using data from Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplantation registry (ANZDATA), Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR), Europe Renal Association (ERA) Registry, and the United States Renal Dialysis System (USRDS). Crude mortality rates were calculated for the first 180 days after transfer. Separate multivariable Cox models were built for early (<90 days), medium (90-180 days), and late (>180 days) periods after transfer., Results: Overall, 6683, 5847, 21,574, and 80,459 patients were included from ANZDATA, CORR, ERA Registry, and USRDS, respectively. In all registries, crude mortality rate was highest during the first 30 days after a transfer to HD declining thereafter to nadir at 4 to 6 months. Crude mortality rates were lower for patients transferring in the most recent years (than earlier). Older age, PD initiation in earlier cohorts, and longer PD vintage were associated with increased risk of death, with the strongest associations during the first 90 days after transfer and attenuating thereafter. Mortality risk was lower for men than women <90 days after transfer, but higher after 180 days., Conclusion: In this multinational study, mortality was highest in the first month after a transfer from PD to HD and risk factors varied by time period after transfer. This study highlights the vulnerability of patients at the time of modality transfer and the need to improve transitions., (© 2022 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Differences in immunogenicity between mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have not been well characterized in patients undergoing dialysis. We compared the serologic response in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna)., Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study at 2 academic centres in Toronto, Canada, from Feb. 2, 2021, to July 20, 2021, which included 129 and 95 patients who received the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, respectively. We measured SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G antibodies to the spike protein (anti-spike), receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) and nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP) at 6-7 and 12 weeks after the second dose of vaccine and compared those levels with the median convalescent serum antibody levels from 211 controls who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2., Results: At 6-7 weeks after 2-dose vaccination, we found that 51 of 70 patients (73%) who received BNT162b2 and 83 of 87 (95%) who received mRNA-1273 attained convalescent levels of anti-spike antibody ( p < 0.001). In those who received BNT162b2, 35 of 70 (50%) reached the convalescent level for anti-RBD compared with 69 of 87 (79%) who received mRNA-1273 ( p < 0.001). At 12 weeks after the second dose, anti-spike and anti-RBD levels were significantly lower in patients who received BNT162b2 than in those who received mRNA-1273. For anti-spike, 70 of 122 patients (57.4%) who received BNT162b2 maintained the convalescent level versus 68 of 71 (96%) of those who received mRNA-1273 ( p < 0.001). For anti-RBD, 47 of 122 patients (38.5%) who received BNT162b2 maintained the anti-RBD convalescent level versus 45 of 71 (63%) of those who received mRNA-1273 ( p = 0.002)., Interpretation: In patients undergoing hemodialysis, mRNA-1273 elicited a stronger humoral response than BNT162b2. Given the rapid decline in immunogenicity at 12 weeks in patients who received BNT162b2, a third dose is recommended in patients undergoing dialysis as a primary series, similar to recommendations for other vulnerable populations., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Mohammad Atiquzzaman and Adeera Levein are employees of the BC Renal Agency. Matthew Oliver and Michelle Hladunewich are contracted medical leads at Ontario Renal Network, Ontario Health. Matthew Oliver is the owner of Oliver Medical Management Inc., which licenses Dialysis Management Analysis and Reporting (DMAR) System software. He holds a Canadian patent for DMAR System, has received speaker fees from Baxter Healthcare and participated on advisory boards for Janssen and Amgen. Jeffrey Perl has received consultant fees from Baxter Healthcare, US Renal Care, Davita Healthcare Partners, Otsuka Canada and AstraZeneca Canada, outside the submitted work; grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant support; and speaker fees from Baxter Healthcare, Fresenius Medical Care USA, AstraZeneca, Davita Healthcare Partners and US Renal Care. Shelly Bolotin has received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Canadian Immunization Research Network, the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force and the Public Health Agency of Canada, outside the submitted work. She is a member of the Canadian Immunization Research Network Management Committee and the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force Leadership Group. Vanessa Tran reports that Public Health Ontario received funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada and test kits from the Canadian Immunity Task Force for COVID-19 serosurveillance studies. Public Health Ontario is also involved in a COVID-19 mix-and-match vaccine clinical trial. Shelly Bolotin and Vanessa Tran are employees of Public Health Ontario. Adeera Levin is the Lead Integrated Clinical and Academic Networks for Providence Health Care. She has participated on the boards of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health and Australian Kidney Clinical Trials Network. She has a leadership or fiduciary role for the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) Advocacy Group, ISN International CKDu Consortium, ISN Research Committee, and the BC Renal Agency. She has received honoraria from GSK, Takeda, Reata, Astra Zeneca and Janssen; and payment for expert testimony from Osler. Peter Blake is the medical director at the Ontario Renal Network, Ontario Health, and has received speaker fees from Baxter Global. Anne-Claude Gingras is a member of the working parties (testing and immunology) of the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, is the chair of the CIHR Institute of Genetics Institute Advisory Board is a member of the National Research Council of Canada Human Health Therapeutics Board and is the Pillar lead, Functional Genomics and Structure-Function at CoVaRR-Net. Michelle Hladunewich has received grants from Pfizer, Ionis, Chemocentryx, Calliditas and Roche; consultant fees from Alynylam; and royalties from UpToDate, outside the submitted work. Jerome Leis has received payments for expert testimony from the Ontario Hospital Association and the Ministry of the Attorney General of Ontario and has a leadership role with Choosing Wisely Canada. Kevin Yau has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca. No other competing interests were declared., (© 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors.)

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) resulting in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is documented to have a negative psychosocial impact on patients. Home dialysis patients may be at risk of additional isolating factors affecting their mental health. The aim of this study is to describe levels of anxiety and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic among home dialysis patients. This is a single-centre survey of home dialysis patients in Toronto, Ontario. Surveys were sent to 98 home haemodialysis and 43 peritoneal dialysis patients. Validated instruments (Haemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Item [GAD7] Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9], Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale, Family APGAR Questionnaire and The Self Perceived Burden Scale) assessing well-being were used. Forty of the 141 patients surveyed, participated in September 2020. The mean age was 53.1 ± 12.1 years, with 60% male, and 85% home haemodialysis, 80% of patients rated their satisfaction with dialysis at 8/10 or greater, 82% of respondents reported either "not at all" or "for several days" indicating frequency of anxiety and depressive symptoms, 79% said their illness minimally or moderately impacted their life, 76% of respondents were almost always satisfied with interactions with family members, 91% were never or sometimes worried about caregiver burden. Among our respondents, there was no indication of a negative psychosocial impact from the pandemic, despite the increased social isolation. Our data further supports the use of home dialysis as the optimal form of dialysis., (© 2021 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Virtual home dialysis physician mentorship is feasible.In total, 53% of participants perceived the program would change the perspective of participants on prescribing home dialysis.More research is needed to ascertain the effect of virtual mentorship on home dialysis incidence and attrition rates in a wider audience., Competing Interests: A. Poyan Mehr reports receiving research funding from Retrophin, as site PI for the DUPLEX Study, a phase 3 randomized trial in primary FSGS, under review, and considerations with industry-sponsored clinical trial agreements with OMEROS, Roche, and Vertex; reports having an advisory or leadership role as Board member of the Glomerular Disease Study and Trial Consortium, a nonprofit 501(c) (3) charitable organization; and reports having other interests or relationships as a Board member and Director of the Glomerular Disease Study and Trial Consortium, an initiative to enhance education about glomerular disorders; this project is collaborating closely with the NephCure Foundation, which has provided financial and in-kind support for a CME accredited conference series focused on clinical trials; and reports their employer does not permit serving on any speaker bureau, advisory board, performing consultancy, or receiving industry honoraria. B. Schiller reports having consultancy agreements with Unicycive Therapeutics Inc.; reports having an ownership interest in CVS, Quanta, and Rockwell Medical; reports having an advisory or leadership role on the Board of Directors at Unicycive; and reports receiving speakers bureau from AstraZeneca. C. T. Chan reports having consultancy agreements with DaVita, Dialco, Medtronic, Quanta, and Redsense Inc.; reports receiving research funding from Medtronic through their external grant program; reports having an advisory or leadership role with DaVita, Medtronic, and Quanta; and reports other interests or relationships through holding the R. Fraser Elliott Chair in Home Dialysis. G. Abra reports receiving honoraria from Akebia; and reports having an advisory or leadership role with Nephrology News & Issues., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Nephrectomy is the mainstay of treatment for many kidney cancers, but has been correlated with increased incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibition has been shown to decrease the incidence of end-stage kidney disease and death in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). However, at present, there has been no description of the use of SGLT2 inhibition in patients with T2D and solitary kidney despite the high risk of CKD progression., Objective: To characterize the use of SGLT2 inhibition and kidney function in a series of patients with T2D with prior nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC)., Design: Retrospective case series., Setting: University hospital outpatient onco-nephrology clinic., Patients: Patients post-nephrectomy for RCC with T2D who were prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor., Measurements: Serum creatinine, albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR), HgA1c, and blood pressure measurements., Methods: Patients post-nephrectomy with incident use of SGLT2 inhibitor were identified from an existing registry of patients followed in the Onco-Nephrology Clinic at our institution from May 2019 to March 2021. Demographics, medication use, time since nephrectomy, cancer diagnosis, serum creatinine, ACR measurements, and blood pressure measurements were extracted from electronic medical records., Results: Five patients were identified who had initiated SGLT2 inhibition post-nephrectomy. All patients were male, had T2D, and a prior history of hypertension. Renal cell carcinoma was the clinical indication for nephrectomy in all patients. None of patients were prescribed diuretics, and all were receiving renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition therapies. The time from nephrectomy to SGLT2 inhibitor initiation ranged from 5 to 74 months. Baseline mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were 49 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.5-66.5), and mean ACRs were 8.7 mg/mmol (95% CI: 0.6-16.9). After 6 months of SGLT2 inhibition, the mean eGFR and ACR values were 58 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI: 29.7-86.2) and 23.8 mg/mmol (95% CI: 0-60), respectively. After 16 to 18 months of follow-up (4 patients), the mean eGFR was 56 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% CI: 37.3-74.7), and mean ACR was 10.5 (95% CI: 0-30.5), similar to baseline values before SGTL2i therapy initiation. At baseline, mean systolic blood pressure was 128 mm Hg (95% CI: 118.3-140.9) and remained similar after 12 months of treatment (mean 131 mm Hg [95% CI: 112.3-149.7]). There were no adverse events related to AKI, electrolyte disturbances, ketoacidosis, or genitourinary infections during the 18-month follow-up period., Limitations: Small sample size, lack of a comparison group, and the variable timing of clinical data collection, including eGFR levels following initiation of SGLT2 inhibition., Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibition is becoming a standard component of nephrology care to reduce kidney function decline, cardiovascular risk, and mortality. To our knowledge, our report is the first to provide longitudinal data on SGLT2 inhibitor usage in patients with T2D and solitary kidneys post-nephrectomy. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibition strategies for kidney protection in patients post-nephrectomy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: David Z.I. Cherney has received consulting fees or speaking honorarium, or both, from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk, Mitsubishis-Tanabe, MAZE, Janssen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim-Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Merck & Co., Inc., Prometic, and Sanofi, and has received operating funds from Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim-Eli Lilly, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Merck & Co., Inc. Marko Škrtić is supported by un-restricted support from Amgen for Onco-Nephrology fellowship., (© The Author(s) 2021.)

Background and Objectives: Video-based telemedicine provides an alternative health care delivery model for patients with CKD. The objective was to provide an overview of the available evidence on the implementation and outcomes of adopting video-based telemedicine in nephrology., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched in December 2019 and again in January 2021 for studies using video-based telemedicine for adults across the spectrum of kidney disease. Study types included peer-reviewed clinical trials, observational studies, and descriptive studies available in full text. Search results were independently screened by two authors, who then independently reviewed and extracted data from the eligible studies. Results were synthesized in tabular format, summarizing study characteristics by area within nephrology; the video-based interventions used; and clinical, health care utilization, and patient-reported outcomes., Results: After reviewing 1870 unique citations, 24 studies were included (four randomized controlled trials, six cohort studies, five pre-post intervention studies, seven case series, and two qualitative studies). Video-based technology was used to facilitate care across all stages of CKD. Although earlier studies used a range of institution-specific technologies that linked main hospital sites to more remote health care locations, more recent studies used technology platforms that allowed patients to receive care in a location of their choice. Video-based care was well received, with the studies reporting high patient satisfaction and acceptable clinical outcomes., Conclusions: Video-based telemedicine is being used for kidney care and has evolved to be less reliant on specialized telemedicine equipment. As its use continues to grow, further primary studies and systematic reviews of outcomes associated with the latest innovations to video-based care in nephrology can address knowledge gaps, such as approaches to sustainable integration and minimization of barriers to access., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: The dialysis treatment day after the 2-day interdialytic interval (Monday/Tuesday) is associated with a heightened risk of hospitalization for patients on in-center hemodialysis (ICHD). In this national cohort study, we sought to characterize hospitalizations by day of the week for patients receiving ICHD, home HD (HHD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to identify whether there were differences in the probability of a Monday/Tuesday admission for each modality type., Methods: Patients on maintenance dialysis in Canada were analyzed from 2005 to 2014 using the Canadian Organ Replacement Register. Patients on hemodialysis were categorized as those receiving ICHD, HHD, frequent ICHD, or frequent HHD (the latter two included short daily and nocturnal HD). Hospitalizations were attributed to the previous treatment if they occurred within 30 days of a treatment change. Differences in the proportion of patients experiencing a Monday/Tuesday admission with all other days of the week were compared using a generalized linear model with binomial distribution and reported using adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs., Results: Overall, 27,430 individuals experienced 111,748 hospitalization episodes. Rates per 1000 patient days were 3.76, 2.98, 2.71, 2.16, and 2.13 for each of frequent ICHD, ICHD, PD, HHD, and frequent HHD, respectively. Compared with those on ICHD, only patients receiving frequent HHD (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.97) and PD (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93 to 0.97) had a lower odds of experiencing a Monday/Tuesday admission. The OR was lower when restricted to hospitalization episodes for cardiovascular reasons comparing frequent HHD with ICHD (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.96)., Conclusion: In this nationally representative cohort, we identified that the probability of a Monday/Tuesday admission was lower for frequent HHD and PD compared with ICHD, most notably for hospitalizations due to cardiovascular causes. Gaining a better understanding of the reasons behind this observation may help to develop future strategies to reduce overall and cause-specific hospitalization for patients receiving dialysis., Competing Interests: C.T. Chan reports having consultancy agreements with, and serving as a scientific advisor for, or member of, DaVita, Medtronic, and Quanta; and receiving research funding from Medtronic (through their external grant program). A.-C. Nadeau-Fredette reports having a current scholarship from Fonds de la recherche du Québec en Santé. J. Perl reports receiving research funding and salary support from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Arbor Research Collaborative For Health; receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Baxter Healthcare USA/Canada, DaVita Healthcare Partners, DCI, Fresenius Medical Care, and US Renal Care; having consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca, Baxter Healthcare Canada, DaVita Healthcare Partners, Fresenius Medical Care, LiberDi, and Otsuka; and serving on a speakers bureau for Baxter Healthcare and Fresenius Medical Care. K.K. Tennankore reports receiving research funding from Astellas Canada and Otsuka Canada; serving on a speakers bureau for AstraZeneca, Baxter, and Bayer; having consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca, Baxter, Bayer, Janssen, and Otsuka; receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Otsuka; and serving as associate editor for the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease. E. Trinh reports having consultancy agreements with Baxter International. The remaining author has nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Importance: Patients undergoing hemodialysis have a high mortality rate associated with COVID-19, and this patient population often has a poor response to vaccinations. Randomized clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines included few patients with kidney disease; therefore, vaccine immunogenicity is uncertain in this population., Objective: To evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis following 1 vs 2 doses of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination compared with health care workers serving as controls and convalescent serum., Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, single-center cohort study was conducted between February 2 and April 17, 2021, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants included 142 patients receiving in-center hemodialysis and 35 health care worker controls., Exposures: BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine., Main Outcomes and Measures: SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies to the spike protein (anti-spike), receptor binding domain (anti-RBD), and nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP)., Results: Among the 142 participants undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, 94 (66%) were men; median age was 72 (interquartile range, 62-79) years. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured in 66 patients receiving 1 vaccine dose following a public health policy change, 76 patients receiving 2 vaccine doses, and 35 health care workers receiving 2 vaccine doses. Detectable anti-NP suggestive of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 15 of 142 (11%) patients at baseline, and only 3 patients had prior COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing. Two additional patients contracted COVID-19 after receiving 2 doses of vaccine. In 66 patients receiving a single BNT162b2 dose, seroconversion occurred in 53 (80%) for anti-spike and 36 (55%) for anti-RBD by 28 days postdose, but a robust response, defined by reaching the median levels of antibodies in convalescent serum from COVID-19 survivors, was noted in only 15 patients (23%) for anti-spike and 4 (6%) for anti-RBD in convalescent serum from COVID-19 survivors. In patients receiving 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine, seroconversion occurred in 69 of 72 (96%) for anti-spike and 63 of 72 (88%) for anti-RBD by 2 weeks following the second dose and median convalescent serum levels were reached in 52 of 72 patients (72%) for anti-spike and 43 of 72 (60%) for anti-RBD. In contrast, all 35 health care workers exceeded the median level of anti-spike and anti-RBD found in convalescent serum 2 to 4 weeks after the second dose., Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests poor immunogenicity 28 days following a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in the hemodialysis population, supporting adherence to recommended vaccination schedules and avoiding delay of the second dose in these at-risk individuals.